Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 118 references

Joint Spatial and Temporal Generalized Dissimilarity Mixed Modeling (stGDMM) for Beta Diversity

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-08 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Jointly modeling all space-time pairs of Bray-Curtis dissimilarities in one generative Bayesian model, with space-time random effects and year-evolving warping functions, improves out-of-sample prediction of beta diversity.

desk verdict Careful, honest extension of spGDMM to two time points; the joint model and the random-effects gain are real, but the temporal 'dynamics' are a single two-year contrast and the warping-model selection is within noise. read the letter →

arxiv 2608.05352 v1 pith:EFMH5OAY submitted 2026-08-05 stat.ME stat.AP

Philip A. White , Henry A. Frye , Jasper A. Slingsby , John A. Silander , Jr. , Hana Petersen , Alan E. Gelfand This is my paper · ORCID
classification stat.MEstat.AP MSC 62M3062F1562P12
keywords betadiversityBray-Curtisdissimilaritygeneralizedmodelspace-timerandomeffectswarpingfunctionsBayesianhierarchicalCapeFloristicRegioncompositionalturnover
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper claims that beta diversity—the change in species composition between places—can be modeled jointly across space and time with a single generative Bayesian model, instead of fitting each survey year separately. The object of study is the full set of pairwise Bray-Curtis dissimilarities among site-year observations, which live on the product space of two space-time points; the authors argue this more than doubles the data available from a year-by-year analysis. On fifty permanent plots in the Cape Floristic Region surveyed in 1996 and again in 2021, the model with space-time random effects reduces out-of-sample root mean square error from 0.1491 to 0.1062 relative to the same model without them. The best warping specification keeps each covariate's overall importance shared across years while allowing the shape of its effect to change. If correct, the framework turns the four conceptual components of beta diversity distinguished by ecologists into explicit, uncertainty-quantified model components.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing machinery is a latent dissimilarity process $V_{t,t'}(s,s')=\mu_{t,t'}(s,s')+\eta_{t,t'}(s,s')+\epsilon_{t,t'}(s,s')$, censored so that values at or below zero become dissimilarity 0 and values at or above one become dissimilarity 1, which gives the model point masses at the boundary values common in real $\beta$-diversity data. The environmental mean $\mu$ combines a global between-year shift $\delta$, a warped distance function, year-specific warped environmental effects $g_{k,t}(\cdot)=\alpha_k F_{k,t}(\cdot)$ built from I-spline basis functions, and nonnegative cumulative contrasts for an ordinal moisture class. The space-time random effect is the squared difference of a bivariate Gaussian process, $\eta_{t,t'}(s,s')=(\psi_t(s)-\psi_{t'}(s'))^2$, with separable cross-covariance given by an unstructured matrix times an exponential decay in geographic distance; fixing the range at one-tenth of the maximum site separation makes the covariance scale identifiable. This construction is what carries information across years and across pairs, and it is what the cross-validation comparison shows is worth keeping.

What would settle it

Resurvey the same fifty plots at a third time and re-run the cross-validation: if the between-year dissimilarities predicted from the 1996/2021 fit fall outside their posterior predictive intervals, or if the estimated global between-year effect, between-year residual variance, and cross-year correlation matrix change beyond their credible intervals when the model is refit with the new year, the paper's temporal identification is falsified.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that a latent-variable model for dissimilarity can accommodate data on the product space of two space-time pairs, including dissimilarities within a year, between years at the same site, and between years at different sites, in one coherent likelihood. The model uses a global between-year effect, time-varying monotone warping functions for environmental covariates and distance, a bivariate Gaussian process whose squared difference forms the space-time random effect, and separate residual variances for each within-year and between-year comparison. Fitting this model by Markov chain Monte Carlo, the authors compare four warping specifications and models with and without random effects via ten-fold cross-validation at the site-year level. They conclude that the space-time random effects are strongly supported by predictive performance, and that allowing warping shape to vary by year while sharing variable importance across years predicts best on every scoring rule, supporting a view in which the relative importance of environmental drivers is stable but their response relationships evolve.

Load-bearing premise

The temporal conclusions rest on exactly two surveys separated by 25 years, so the between-year shift, the between-year correlation, and the between-year residual variance are all identified from a single 1996-to-2021 contrast; if that contrast cannot be separated from year-to-year noise, the dynamic claims collapse.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Datasets with few survey years no longer need to discard between-year dissimilarities; the full set of site-year pairs becomes usable for estimation and prediction.
  • The four conceptual components of beta diversity the paper targets become explicit model components, so a study can attribute change to spatial turnover, temporal turnover, or their interaction with posterior uncertainty.
  • Adding space-time random effects improves held-out prediction enough (RMSE 0.1491 to 0.1062) to recommend the full joint model for gap-filling and forecasting of unobserved site-years.
  • The winning warping specification implies that the relative importance of environmental covariates can be treated as stable across years while their response shapes shift, a substantive ecological conclusion about what changes over time.
  • All warping curves, importance parameters, and random-effect surfaces come with posterior credible intervals, so inferences about drivers of beta diversity are uncertainty-quantified rather than point estimates.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • An extension the authors leave implicit: the real test of the temporal machinery is a third survey; if the model can predict 2021-to-2026 between-year dissimilarities from estimates made on 1996 and 2021, the one-contrast identification is doing real work rather than absorbing noise.
  • The squared-difference random effect is symmetric in time, so the model cannot distinguish 1996-to-2021 change from 2021-to-1996 change; a directed or signed version of the effect would be needed to test directional turnover, which the paper notes would require order-dependent dissimilarity metrics.
  • A testable extension is to apply the same model to richness-standardized or incidence-based dissimilarities; the paper notes that lower 2021 richness may confound the moisture-class finding, and a nestedness-aware metric would separate species loss from compositional replacement.
  • The severe parameter explosion the authors concede for more than two years suggests the framework's practical payoff will come from simplified dynamic structures, such as shared importance with year-specific shapes, rather than fully unrestricted year-by-year warping.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. This paper proposes stGDMM, a Bayesian hierarchical extension of the authors' earlier spGDMM for pairwise beta-diversity dissimilarities. The response is the set of Bray–Curtis dissimilarities on the product space (t,s)×(t',s'); the latent mean combines an intercept, a global between-year effect, warped geographic distance, time-specific I-spline warped continuous covariates, cumulative ordinal effects, and a squared-difference bivariate Gaussian process space-time random effect, with heteroscedastic errors and point masses at zero and one. The model is fit by MCMC and compared by 10-fold site-year-level cross-validation on 100 site-years (50 Cape Floristic Region plots surveyed in 1996 and 2021, 4950 pairwise dissimilarities). The main empirical findings are that including the space-time random effect sharply improves predictive scores (RMSE 0.1491→0.1062 for the best warping specification) and that among four warping specifications, shared variable importance with year-specific shape (Warping Model 3) scores best, although by very small margins.

Significance. If the claims are sustained, the paper makes a useful contribution: it embeds a GDM-style warping model in a fully generative hierarchical framework on the space-time product space, uses all pairwise dissimilarities including between-year pairs, provides posterior predictive uncertainty quantification, and connects four conceptual components of beta diversity from Heino et al. (2024). The paper ships code and processed data, and the cross-validation design is careful in holding out site-years rather than individual pairs. The large random-effect improvement is a real empirical finding. However, the temporal-dynamics claim is only weakly identified from two time points, and the selection of Warping Model 3 over Warping Model 1 rests on fourth-decimal differences in scoring rules with no reported uncertainty. The manuscript is therefore a promising two-time-point joint modeling framework, but it is not yet a validated dynamic model for temporal beta diversity.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section 3.1, Eq. (4)-(5); Section 5] With exactly two survey years, the temporal components—the global between-year effect δ, the year-specific warping functions g_{k,t}, the 2×2 covariance V in the bivariate GP, and the between-year variance σ^2_12—are all identified from a single 1996-to-2021 contrast. The model can compare two snapshots, but it cannot separate a directional temporal trend from year-to-year stochastic variation. The paper's own Section 5 concedes that extending the model to m>2 causes a 'severe explosion of parameters and functions', which confirms that the two-time-point specification is not a restricted case of a scalable temporal process. The abstract and Section 1.2 accordingly overstate what is identified. Please either reframe the contribution as joint modeling of two time points with a global between-year effect, or provide simulation evidence that the dynamic parameters (δ, V, and year-specific warping shapes) are recoverable under this design.
  2. [Table 2 and Section 4.1] The evidence for selecting Warping Model 3 is marginal: it beats Warping Model 1 by RMSE 0.1062 vs. 0.1063, CRPS 0.0591 vs. 0.0595, and LogS -0.7036 vs. -0.6933, with no fold-level estimates, Monte Carlo intervals, or paired comparisons reported. Therefore the statement that 'allowing temporal changes in the shape of the covariate effects improves prediction' is not established by the reported results. Please report per-fold scores and the distribution of fold-level differences between warping specifications, or otherwise quantify the uncertainty of these model-comparison statistics.
  3. [Section 3.1, Eq. (5)] The spatial range ρ is fixed at 1.51 km, one-tenth of the maximum site distance, solely to make the covariance V identifiable. Because the central empirical claim is the large predictive gain from the space-time random effects, and Section 4.3 interprets the ψ_t(s) surfaces, the analysis should include a sensitivity assessment of the fixed ρ. At minimum, the choice should be justified relative to the study extent and site spacing, and the robustness of the random-effect improvement and of the ψ_t(s) surfaces to alternative fixed values of ρ should be reported.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Section 4.3] The sentence 'The squared difference surface corresponds to the within years random effects in our model' appears to describe the between-year squared difference (ψ_2021(s)−ψ_1996(s))^2; please correct the wording to avoid confusion.
  2. [Figure 6 caption] The caption states that 'The distance warping function is shared across years', but Figure 5 and the Warping Model 3 description suggest year-specific distance warping; please reconcile the caption with the model specification.
  3. [Section 2.2] The description of the fourth histogram in Figure 2 as 'spatial and temporal differences among plots between years' could be clarified to 'between-site, between-year dissimilarities', which is the category used in Section 1.2.
  4. [Section 3.2] Please state explicitly how posterior predictive draws for held-out dissimilarities handle the site-year random effects when the held-out site-year is partially observed through other pairs in the training set; the current text describes the steps but not which random-effect values are used for partially unobserved site-years.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the central predictive claims rest on held-out cross-validation, not on fitted inputs restated as predictions.

full rationale

The paper's main empirical claim—that including the proposed space-time random effects dramatically improves predictive performance (Section 4.1, Table 2)—is evaluated by 10-fold cross-validation at the site-by-time level (Section 3.3), where all dissimilarities involving each held-out site-year are excluded from fitting. The reported RMSE/CRPS improvements are therefore out-of-sample predictions, not in-sample fits renamed as predictions. The modeling framework builds on the authors' earlier spGDMM (White et al., 2024a), but that prior work contributes the warping and random-effect machinery, while the dynamic extension is independently assessed through predictive scoring rules on held-out data. The fixed range parameter rho = 1.51 km is a stated identifiability choice with an external citation (Zhang, 2004), not a fitted parameter smuggled back into the prediction. The paper itself concedes that with two time points the temporal components are limited and that extending to m years would cause a 'severe explosion of parameters and functions' (Section 5), but this is an identifiability and data limitation, not a circular derivation. No load-bearing step reduces by construction to its own inputs.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 1 invented entities

The model depends on a small set of hand-tuned structural choices: a fixed GP range, fixed I-spline knot locations, and the assumption that two time points identify temporal dynamics. These are not derived from first principles or externally benchmarked; they are modeling decisions that shape the conclusions.

free parameters (2)
  • rho (Gaussian process range) = 1.51 km (fixed, one-tenth of maximum site distance)
    Fixed rather than estimated because of Matern identifiability issues (Zhang, 2004); the value affects the smoothness and range of the space-time random effect surfaces.
  • I-spline interior knot locations = 33rd and 67th percentiles of each predictor, 5 basis functions
    Chosen by hand following White et al. (2024a); locations and basis count control the flexibility of the warping functions and are not estimated.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Pairwise Bray-Curtis dissimilarities arise from a latent Gaussian variable censored at 0 and 1.
    Equations (2)-(3) define V as Gaussian; this generative assumption is not derived from species sampling models.
  • domain assumption Two survey years provide enough information to identify year-specific warping functions and between-year process correlation.
    Section 3.1 and Section 5: with m=2 all temporal dynamics are contrasts of one 1996-2021 interval; Section 5 admits severe parameter explosion for more time points.
  • ad hoc to paper A separable bivariate Gaussian process with fixed range rho is an adequate representation of residual space-time dependence.
    Equation (5) specifies the GP and fixes rho at 1.51 km; no sensitivity analysis or alternative covariance is tested.
  • standard math Monotone I-spline basis with nonnegative coefficients represents environmental warping functions.
    Section 3.1, following Ramsay (1988); standard tool.
  • standard math Matern-like GP scale and range are not jointly identifiable, motivating fixed rho.
    Invoked via Zhang (2004) in Section 3.1.
invented entities (1)
  • Squared-difference space-time random effect eta_{t,t'}(s,s') = (psi_t(s) - psi_{t'}(s'))^2
    purpose: Captures residual spatial and temporal dependence in pairwise dissimilarities not explained by environmental covariates or distance.
    It is a latent statistical construct; it has no observable handle outside the dissimilarity likelihood and its scale depends on the fixed range parameter rho.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Joint Spatial and Temporal Generalized Dissimilarity Mixed Modeling (stGDMM) for Beta Diversity." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/EFMH5OAY

@misc{pith2026260805352,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Joint Spatial and Temporal Generalized Dissimilarity Mixed Modeling (stGDMM) for Beta Diversity},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/EFMH5OAY}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2608.05352}
}
read the original abstract

Generalized dissimilarity models (GDMs) have emerged as a valuable tool for formal statistical analysis of biodiversity. In particular, beta diversity, measured using dissimilarity measures, e.g., the Bray-Curtis dissimilarity in our case, provides a statistical summary of the difference in species composition between sites. It also provides novel data for spatial and spatio-temporal modeling as it resides over the product space of one space-time pair and a second space-time pair. In earlier work we developed the spatial generalized dissimilarity mixed model (spGDMM) to remedy some of the stochastic issues concerned with the foundational GDM in the literature. Here, we extend that work to include dynamics. We find much richer modeling opportunities as we consider beta diversity with regard to change in time as well as space. We illustrate with a dataset from the Cape Floristic Region (CFR) in South Africa.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2608.05352 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Study region and sampling locations. The left panel shows the location of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Empirical distributions of Bray–Curtis dissimilarities by temporal comparison. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Temporal persistence in pairwise Bray–Curtis dissimilarity. Each point represents [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (5 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Estimated warping functions under Warping Model 3. Curves show posterior mean [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p023_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Estimated warping functions for distance functions between years, within 1996, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p023_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Posterior summaries of covariate effects under Warping Model 3. (Left) Posterior [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p025_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Posterior mean surfaces for the spatial random effects, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p028_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Contribution of the space-time random effect to pairwise dissimilarity for a fixed [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p029_8.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

118 extracted references · 71 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    The IPBES Conceptual Framework — connecting nature and people

    Díaz, Sandra and others. The IPBES Conceptual Framework — connecting nature and people. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability. doi:10.1016/j.cosust.2014.11.002

    work page doi:10.1016/j.cosust.2014.11.002 2014

  2. [2]

    Scholes, R J and Mace, G M and Turner, W and Geller, G N and Jurgens, N and Larigauderie, A and Muchoney, D and Walther, B A and Mooney, H A. Ecology. Toward a global biodiversity observing system. Science (New York, N.Y.). doi:10.1126/science.1162055

    work page doi:10.1126/science.1162055

  3. [3]

    BioTIME: A database of biodiversity time series for the Anthropocene

    Dornelas, Maria and others. BioTIME: A database of biodiversity time series for the Anthropocene. Global ecology and biogeography: a journal of macroecology. doi:10.1111/geb.12729

    doi:10.1111/geb.12729

  4. [4]

    BioTIME 2.0: Expanding and improving a database of biodiversity time series

    Dornelas, Maria and others. BioTIME 2.0: Expanding and improving a database of biodiversity time series. Global ecology and biogeography: a journal of macroecology. doi:10.1111/geb.70003

    doi:10.1111/geb.70003

  5. [5]

    A temporal beta-diversity index to identify sites that have changed in exceptional ways in space-time surveys

    Legendre, Pierre. A temporal beta-diversity index to identify sites that have changed in exceptional ways in space-time surveys. Ecology and Evolution. doi:10.1002/ece3.4984

    work page doi:10.1002/ece3.4984

  6. [6]

    Diversity and Distributions , volume=

    Using generalized dissimilarity modelling to analyse and predict patterns of beta diversity in regional biodiversity assessment , author=. Diversity and Distributions , volume=. 2007 , publisher=

    2007

  7. [7]

    Statistical Modelling , pages=

    Outlier Accommodation with Semiparametric Density Processes: A Study of Antarctic Snow Density Modelling , author=. Statistical Modelling , pages=. 2021 , publisher=

    2021

  8. [8]

    BILBI: Supporting global biodiversity assessment through high-resolution macroecological modelling

    Hoskins, Andrew J and Harwood, Thomas D and Ware, Chris and Williams, Kristen J and Perry, Justin J and Ota, Noboru and Croft, Jim R and Yeates, David K and Jetz, Walter and Golebiewski, Maciej and Purvis, Andy and Robertson, Tim and Ferrier, Simon. BILBI: Supporting global biodiversity assessment through high-resolution macroecological modelling. Environ...

    work page arXiv

Show all 118 references
  1. [9]

    A globally applicable indicator of the capacity of terrestrial ecosystems to retain biological diversity under climate change: The bioclimatic ecosystem resilience index

    Ferrier, Simon and Harwood, Thomas D and Ware, Chris and Hoskins, Andrew J. A globally applicable indicator of the capacity of terrestrial ecosystems to retain biological diversity under climate change: The bioclimatic ecosystem resilience index. Ecological indicators. doi:10....

  2. [10]

    A working guide to harnessing generalized dissimilarity modelling for biodiversity analysis and conservation assessment

    Mokany, Karel and Ware, Chris and Woolley, Skipton N C and Ferrier, Simon and Fitzpatrick, Matthew C. A working guide to harnessing generalized dissimilarity modelling for biodiversity analysis and conservation assessment. Global ecology and biogeography: a journal of macroeco...

    doi

  3. [11]

    How Should Beta-Diversity Inform Biodiversity Conservation?

    Socolar, Jacob B and Gilroy, James J and Kunin, William E and Edwards, David P. How Should Beta-Diversity Inform Biodiversity Conservation?. Trends in ecology & evolution. doi:10.1016/j.tree.2015.11.005

    2015 doi

  4. [12]

    Spatial mismatch and congruence between taxonomic, phylogenetic and functional diversity: the need for integrative conservation strategies in a changing world

    Devictor, Vincent and Mouillot, David and Meynard, Christine and Jiguet, Fr \'e d \'e ric and Thuiller, Wilfried and Mouquet, Nicolas. Spatial mismatch and congruence between taxonomic, phylogenetic and functional diversity: the need for integrative conservation strategies in ...

  5. [14]

    Plant beta-diversity across biomes captured by imaging spectroscopy

    Schweiger, Anna K and Lalibert \'e , Etienne. Plant beta-diversity across biomes captured by imaging spectroscopy. Nature communications. doi:10.1038/s41467-022-30369-6

    doi

  6. [15]

    Vegetation of the Hantam-Tanqua-Roggeveld subregion, South Africa

    van der Merwe, Helga and van Rooyen, Margaretha W and van Rooyen, Noel. Vegetation of the Hantam-Tanqua-Roggeveld subregion, South Africa. Part 1: Fynbos Biome related vegetation. Koedoe. doi:10.4102/koedoe.v50i1.130

    doi

  7. [16]

    Vegetation of the Hantam-Tanqua-Roggeveld subregion, South Africa Part 2: Succulent Karoo Biome related vegetation

    van der Merwe, Helga and van Rooyen, Margaretha W and van Rooyen, Noel. Vegetation of the Hantam-Tanqua-Roggeveld subregion, South Africa Part 2: Succulent Karoo Biome related vegetation. Koedoe. doi:10.4102/koedoe.v50i1.148

    doi

  8. [17]

    Journal of the American Statistical Association , volume=

    Inconsistent estimation and asymptotically equal interpolations in model-based geostatistics , author=. Journal of the American Statistical Association , volume=. 2004 , publisher=

    2004

  9. [18]

    Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities

    Myers, N and Mittermeier, R A and Mittermeier, C G and da Fonseca, G A and Kent, J. Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature. doi:10.1038/35002501

    doi

  10. [19]

    The Annals of Applied Statistics , volume=

    Hierarchical integrated spatial process modeling of monotone West Antarctic snow density curves , author=. The Annals of Applied Statistics , volume=. 2021 , publisher=

    2021

  11. [20]

    Computational Statistics & Data Analysis , volume=

    A general class of zero-or-one inflated beta regression models , author=. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis , volume=. 2012 , publisher=

    2012

  12. [21]

    The Annals of Applied Statistics , volume=

    Spatial functional data modeling of plant reflectances , author=. The Annals of Applied Statistics , volume=. 2022 , publisher=

    2022

  13. [22]

    Programming with models: writing statistical algorithms for general model structures with

    de Valpine, Perry and Turek, Daniel and Paciorek, Christopher J and Anderson-Bergman, Clifford and Lang, Duncan Temple and Bodik, Rastislav , journal=. Programming with models: writing statistical algorithms for general model structures with. 2017 , publisher=

    2017

  14. [23]

    , author=

    The Gaussian Process Density Sampler. , author=. NIPS , pages=

  15. [24]

    Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics , volume=

    Bayesian semiparametric density estimation and model verification using a logistic--gaussian process , author=. Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics , volume=. 2003 , publisher=

    2003

  16. [25]

    Journal of the American statistical Association , volume=

    Bayesian analysis of binary and polychotomous response data , author=. Journal of the American statistical Association , volume=. 1993 , publisher=

    1993

  17. [26]

    R package version , volume=

    Using the R package gdm to analyze and map biodiversity patterns , author=. R package version , volume=

  18. [27]

    Ecology letters , volume=

    A new statistical approach for assessing similarity of species composition with incidence and abundance data , author=. Ecology letters , volume=. 2005 , publisher=

    2005

  19. [28]

    A vegetation survey of the Cape of Good Hope Nature Reserve. I. The use of association-analysis and Braun-Blanquet methods , author=. Bothalia , volume=

  20. [29]

    South African Journal of Science , volume=

    Species-area curves based on releve data for the Cape Floristic Region , author=. South African Journal of Science , volume=. 2003 , publisher=

    2003

  21. [30]

    Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics , volume=

    Automated factor slice sampling , author=. Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics , volume=. 2014 , publisher=

    2014

  22. [31]

    International Statistical Review , volume=

    Predictive inference based on Markov chain Monte Carlo output , author=. International Statistical Review , volume=. 2021 , publisher=

    2021

  23. [32]

    , title =

    White, Philip A. , title =. doi:10.5281/zenodo.10091441 , url =

    doi

  24. [33]

    Journal of the American Statistical Association , volume=

    Smoothing spline density estimation: A dimensionless automatic algorithm , author=. Journal of the American Statistical Association , volume=. 1993 , publisher=

    1993

  25. [34]

    The annals of mathematical statistics , pages=

    A polynomial algorithm for density estimation , author=. The annals of mathematical statistics , pages=. 1971 , publisher=

    1971

  26. [35]

    Equi-spaced knots , author=

    Interpolating spline methods for density estimation I. Equi-spaced knots , author=. The Annals of Statistics , pages=. 1975 , publisher=

    1975

  27. [36]

    Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation , volume=

    Density estimation via hybrid splines , author=. Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation , volume=. 1998 , publisher=

    1998

  28. [37]

    , booktitle=

    Neal, R.M. , booktitle=. Regression and classification using. 1999 , editor=

    1999

  29. [38]

    Proceedings of the thirteenth international conference on artificial intelligence and statistics , pages=

    Elliptical slice sampling , author=. Proceedings of the thirteenth international conference on artificial intelligence and statistics , pages=. 2010 , organization=

    2010

  30. [39]

    J. O. Ramsay , journal =. Monotone Regression Splines in Action , urldate =

  31. [40]

    Journal of Agricultural, Biological and Environmental Statistics , pages=

    Zero-inflated Beta distribution regression modeling , author=. Journal of Agricultural, Biological and Environmental Statistics , pages=. 2022 , publisher=

    2022

  32. [41]

    unpublished manuscript , number =

    Admissible Scoring Systems for Continuous Distributions , author=. unpublished manuscript , number =. 1974 , institution =

    1974

  33. [42]

    Statistics and computing , volume=

    Practical Bayesian model evaluation using leave-one-out cross-validation and WAIC , author=. Statistics and computing , volume=. 2017 , publisher=

    2017

  34. [43]

    Annals of Botany , volume=

    Fire-modulated fluctuations in nutrient availability stimulate biome-scale floristic turnover in time, and elevated species richness, in low-nutrient fynbos heathland , author=. Annals of Botany , volume=. 2024 , publisher=

    2024

  35. [44]

    Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences , volume=

    Intensifying postfire weather and biological invasion drive species loss in a Mediterranean-type biodiversity hotspot , author=. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences , volume=. 2017 , publisher=

    2017

  36. [45]

    PLoS One , volume=

    Stochastic species turnover and stable coexistence in a species-rich, fire-prone plant community , author=. PLoS One , volume=. 2007 , publisher=

    2007

  37. [46]

    Management Science , volume=

    Scoring Rules for Continuous Probability Distributions , author=. Management Science , volume=. 1976 , publisher=

    1976

  38. [47]

    Journal of the American Statistical Association , volume=

    Strictly Proper Scoring Rules, Prediction, and Estimation , author=. Journal of the American Statistical Association , volume=. 2007 , publisher=

    2007

  39. [48]

    Journal of the american statistical association , volume=

    Bayesian density estimation and inference using mixtures , author=. Journal of the american statistical association , volume=. 1995 , publisher=

    1995

  40. [49]

    The Journal of Ecology , pages=

    Non-metric ordination methods in ecology , author=. The Journal of Ecology , pages=. 1977 , publisher=

    1977

  41. [50]

    Researches on Population Ecology , volume=

    Randomization and regression methods for testing for associations with geographical, environmental and biological distances between populations , author=. Researches on Population Ecology , volume=. 1986 , publisher=

    1986

  42. [51]

    Ecology , volume=

    Spatial autocorrelation: trouble or new paradigm? , author=. Ecology , volume=. 1993 , publisher=

    1993

  43. [52]

    Ecology letters , volume=

    Navigating the multiple meanings of diversity: a roadmap for the practicing ecologist , author=. Ecology letters , volume=. 2011 , publisher=

    2011

  44. [53]

    Systematic biology , volume=

    Mapping spatial pattern in biodiversity for regional conservation planning: where to from here? , author=. Systematic biology , volume=. 2002 , publisher=

    2002

  45. [54]

    Journal of Applied Ecology , volume=

    Biodiversity change is uncoupled from species richness trends: Consequences for conservation and monitoring , author=. Journal of Applied Ecology , volume=. 2018 , publisher=

    2018

  46. [55]

    Ecological monographs , volume=

    Vegetation of the Siskiyou mountains, Oregon and California , author=. Ecological monographs , volume=. 1960 , publisher=

    1960

  47. [56]

    2025 , publisher=

    Hierarchical modeling and analysis for spatial data , author=. 2025 , publisher=

    2025

  48. [57]

    Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences , volume=

    Environmental and historical imprints on beta diversity: insights from variation in rates of species turnover along gradients , author=. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences , volume=. 2013 , publisher=

    2013

  49. [58]

    Nature , volume=

    Plant diversity dynamics over space and time in a warming Arctic , author=. Nature , volume=. 2025 , publisher=

    2025

  50. [59]

    1996 , publisher=

    Tools for Statistical Inference , author=. 1996 , publisher=

    1996

  51. [60]

    Journal of Vegetation Science , volume=

    Rate of compositional turnover along gradients and total gradient length , author=. Journal of Vegetation Science , volume=. 1995 , publisher=

    1995

  52. [61]

    Global Ecology and Conservation , volume=

    Navigating the spatial and temporal aspects of beta diversity to facilitate understanding biodiversity change , author=. Global Ecology and Conservation , volume=. 2024 , publisher=

    2024

  53. [62]

    BioScience , volume=

    Mapping more of terrestrial biodiversity for global conservation assessment , author=. BioScience , volume=. 2004 , publisher=

    2004

  54. [63]

    Biometrics , volume=

    Abundance-based similarity indices and their estimation when there are unseen species in samples , author=. Biometrics , volume=. 2006 , publisher=

    2006

  55. [64]

    1988 , publisher=

    Ecological diversity and its measurement , author=. 1988 , publisher=

    1988

  56. [65]

    Ecological monographs , volume=

    An ordination of the upland forest communities of southern Wisconsin , author=. Ecological monographs , volume=. 1957 , publisher=

    1957

  57. [66]

    Journal of Biogeography , volume=

    SESAM--a new framework integrating macroecological and species distribution models for predicting spatio-temporal patterns of species assemblages , author=. Journal of Biogeography , volume=. 2011 , publisher=

    2011

  58. [67]

    Explaining species distribution patterns through hierarchical modeling , author=

  59. [68]

    Ecology , volume=

    Modeling species co-occurrence by multivariate logistic regression generates new hypotheses on fungal interactions , author=. Ecology , volume=. 2010 , publisher=

    2010

  60. [69]

    Methods in Ecology and Evolution , volume=

    Understanding co-occurrence by modelling species simultaneously with a Joint Species Distribution Model (JSDM) , author=. Methods in Ecology and Evolution , volume=. 2014 , publisher=

    2014

  61. [70]

    Biometrics , volume=

    Effects of residual smoothing on the posterior of the fixed effects in disease-mapping models , author=. Biometrics , volume=. 2006 , publisher=

    2006

  62. [71]

    Sankhya B , volume=

    On multivariate folded normal distribution , author=. Sankhya B , volume=. 2013 , publisher=

    2013

  63. [72]

    Journal of the American Statistical Association , volume=

    Restricted spatial regression methods: Implications for inference , author=. Journal of the American Statistical Association , volume=. 2022 , publisher=

    2022

  64. [73]

    Methods in Ecology and Evolution , volume=

    Uncovering hidden spatial structure in species communities with spatially explicit joint species distribution models , author=. Methods in Ecology and Evolution , volume=. 2016 , publisher=

    2016

  65. [74]

    Methods in Ecology and Evolution , volume=

    A comparison of joint species distribution models for presence--absence data , author=. Methods in Ecology and Evolution , volume=. 2019 , publisher=

    2019

  66. [75]

    Journal of applied statistics , volume=

    Beta regression for modelling rates and proportions , author=. Journal of applied statistics , volume=. 2004 , publisher=

    2004

  67. [76]

    Schulze, R. E. , year =. South

  68. [77]

    doi:10.5067/MEASURES/NASADEM/NASADEM_HGT.001 , note =

    NASA JPL , year =. doi:10.5067/MEASURES/NASADEM/NASADEM_HGT.001 , note =

    doi

  69. [78]

    PLOS ONE , author =

    Ecologically-. PLOS ONE , author =. 2015 , pages =. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0143619 , language =

    2015 doi

  70. [79]

    Diversity and Distributions , author =

    New regionally modelled soil layers improve prediction of vegetation type relative to that based on global soil models , volume =. Diversity and Distributions , author =. 2019 , pages =. doi:10.1111/ddi.12973 , language =

    2019 doi

  71. [80]

    Science , author =

    Neutral. Science , author =. 2005 , pages =. doi:10.1126/science.1115576 , abstract =

    2005 doi

  72. [81]

    2022 , note =

    gdm: Generalized Dissimilarity Modeling , author =. 2022 , note =

    2022

  73. [82]

    Journal of Biogeography , author =

    Environmental correlates of biome-level floristic turnover in. Journal of Biogeography , author =. 2017 , pages =. doi:10.1111/jbi.12971 , language =

    2017 doi

  74. [83]

    and Schmiedel, Ute and Esler, Karen J

    Mucina, Ladislav and Jürgens, Norbert and le Roux, Annelise and Rutherford, Michael C. and Schmiedel, Ute and Esler, Karen J. and Powrie, Leslie W. and Desmet, Philip G. and Milton, Susanne J. , year =. Succulent. The

  75. [84]

    South African Journal of Botany , author =

    Predicting the distribution of fynbos and succulent karoo biome boundaries and plant communities using generalised linear models and geographic information systems , volume =. South African Journal of Botany , author =. 1999 , pages =. doi:10.1016/S0254-6299(15)30945-5 , language =

    1999 doi

  76. [85]

    Rebelo, Anthony G and Boucher, C and Helme, Nick and Mucina, Ladislav and Rutherford, Michael C , month = jan, year =. Fynbos. The vegetation of

  77. [86]

    and Verboom, G

    Ellis, Allan G. and Verboom, G. Anthony and van der Niet, Timotheus and Johnson, Steven D. and Linder, H. Peter , year =. Speciation and extinction in the. Fynbos:

  78. [87]

    Trends in Ecology & Evolution , author =

    Plant diversity in mediterranean-climate regions , volume =. Trends in Ecology & Evolution , author =. 1996 , pages =. doi:10.1016/0169-5347(96)10044-6 , language =

    1996 doi

  79. [88]

    Methods in Ecology and Evolution , author =

    What does a zero mean?. Methods in Ecology and Evolution , author =. 2019 , pages =. doi:10.1111/2041-210X.13185 , language =

    2019 doi

  80. [89]

    Methods in Ecology and Evolution , author =

    Characterising uncertainty in generalised dissimilarity models , volume =. Methods in Ecology and Evolution , author =. 2017 , pages =. doi:10.1111/2041-210X.12710 , language =

    2017 doi

  81. [90]

    Fynbos: ecology, evolution, and conservation of a megadiverse region , publisher =

  82. [91]

    Ecological Applications , author =

    Building. Ecological Applications , author =. 2006 , pages =. doi:10.1890/04-0609 , language =

    2006 doi

  83. [92]

    Ecology Letters , author =

    Hierarchical models facilitate spatial analysis of large data sets: a case study on invasive plant species in the northeastern. Ecology Letters , author =. 2009 , pages =. doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2008.01270.x , language =

    2009

  84. [93]

    Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Methodological) , volume=

    Rational decisions , author=. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Methodological) , volume=. 1952 , publisher=

    1952

  85. [94]

    2014 , publisher=

    Hierarchical Modeling and Analysis for Spatial Data , author=. 2014 , publisher=

    2014

  86. [95]

    1997 , publisher=

    Bayesian forecasting and dynamic models , author=. 1997 , publisher=

    1997

  87. [96]

    2019 , publisher=

    Spatio-temporal statistics with R , author=. 2019 , publisher=

    2019

  88. [97]

    Science , author =

    Beta-. Science , author =. 2002 , pages =. doi:10.1126/science.1066854 , abstract =

    2002 doi

  89. [98]

    Ecological Modelling , volume=

    Good modelling practice in ecology, the hierarchical Bayesian perspective , author=. Ecological Modelling , volume=. 2024 , publisher=

    2024

  90. [99]

    Ecology letters , volume=

    Why environmental scientists are becoming Bayesians , author=. Ecology letters , volume=. 2005 , publisher=

    2005

  91. [100]

    Trends in Ecology & evolution , volume=

    A future for models and data in environmental science , author=. Trends in Ecology & evolution , volume=. 2006 , publisher=

    2006

  92. [101]

    Generative spatial generalized dissimilarity mixed modelling (

    White, Philip A and Frye, Henry A and Slingsby, Jasper A and Silander Jr, John A and Gelfand, Alan E , journal=. Generative spatial generalized dissimilarity mixed modelling (. 2024 , publisher=

    2024

  93. [102]

    Fitzpatrick, Matt and Mokany, Karel and Manion, Glenn and Nieto-Lugilde, Diego and Ferrier, Simon , year =. gdm:

  94. [103]

    2006 , note =

    The vegetation of. 2006 , note =

    2006

  95. [104]

    South African National Biodiversity Institute , year =. The

  96. [105]

    Taxon , author =

    Evolution and. Taxon , author =. 1972 , pages =. doi:10.2307/1218190 , number =

    1972 doi

  97. [106]

    Trends in Ecology & Evolution , author =

    Fifteen forms of biodiversity trend in the. Trends in Ecology & Evolution , author =. 2015 , pages =. doi:10.1016/j.tree.2014.11.006 , language =

    2015 doi

  98. [107]

    Nature , author =

    Biodiversity loss and its impact on humanity , volume =. Nature , author =. 2012 , pages =. doi:10.1038/nature11148 , language =

    2012 doi

  99. [108]

    Science , author =

    Biodiversity losses and conservation responses in the. Science , author =. 2017 , pages =. doi:10.1126/science.aam9317 , abstract =

    2017 doi

  100. [109]

    Science Advances , author =

    The direct drivers of recent global anthropogenic biodiversity loss , volume =. Science Advances , author =. 2022 , pages =. doi:10.1126/sciadv.abm9982 , abstract =

    2022 doi

  101. [110]

    Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B , author =

    Looking back on biodiversity change: lessons for the road ahead , volume =. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B , author =. 2023 , pages =. doi:10.1098/rstb.2022.0199 , abstract =

    2023

  102. [111]

    Global Ecology and Biogeography , author =

    Temporal diversity—. Global Ecology and Biogeography , author =. 2019 , pages =. doi:10.1111/geb.13026 , abstract =

    2019 doi

  103. [112]

    Methods in Ecology and Evolution , author =

    Measuring temporal change in alpha diversity:. Methods in Ecology and Evolution , author =. 2021 , pages =. doi:10.1111/2041-210X.13682 , abstract =

    2021 doi

  104. [113]

    Science , author =

    Recent. Science , author =. 2012 , pages =. doi:10.1126/science.1219033 , abstract =

    2012 doi

  105. [114]

    Ecology and Evolution , author =

    Spatial and temporal structure of diversity and demographic dynamics along a successional gradient of tropical forests in southern. Ecology and Evolution , author =. 2020 , pages =. doi:10.1002/ece3.5816 , abstract =

    2020 doi

  106. [115]

    Biological Reviews , author =

    Biotic homogenisation and differentiation as directional change in beta diversity: synthesising driver–response relationships to develop conceptual models across ecosystems , volume =. Biological Reviews , author =. 2023 , pages =. doi:10.1111/brv.12958 , abstract =

    2023 doi

  107. [116]

    Plant Ecology , author =

    Patterns of seed persistence in. Plant Ecology , author =. 2004 , pages =. doi:10.1023/B:VEGE.0000026035.73496.34 , language =

    2004

  108. [117]

    Annals of Botany , author =

    Experimental investigation of the origin of fynbos plant community structure after fire , volume =. Annals of Botany , author =. 2012 , pages =. doi:10.1093/aob/mcs160 , language =

    2012 doi

  109. [118]

    New Phytologist , author =

    A fundamental, eco‐hydrological basis for niche segregation in plant communities , volume =. New Phytologist , author =. 2011 , pages =. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8137.2010.03475.x , abstract =

    2011

  110. [119]

    and Midgley, Guy F

    Guo, Danni and Arnolds, Judith L. and Midgley, Guy F. and Araya, Yoseph N. and Silvertown, Jonathan and Musil, Charles F. , editor =. Determination of. Current. 2021 , pages =. doi:10.9734/bpi/cagees/v1/4247F , urldate =

    2021 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 8, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.