Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 43 references

Compact balanced threefolds and LCK manifolds with constant holomorphic sectional curvature

T0 review · 2 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-08 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Constant holomorphic sectional curvature on compact balanced threefolds forces Kähler or Chern flat, and the non-Kähler LCK cases are Hopf manifolds.

desk verdict A strong paper: real progress on balanced threefolds, and the LCK theorems are convincing conditional on a cited uniformization that the authors should surface more carefully. read the letter →

arxiv 2608.05598 v1 pith:7SADPH3Y submitted 2026-08-06 math.DG

Shuwen Chen , Junpeng Li This is my paper · ORCID
classification math.DG MSC 53C5553C05
keywords holomorphicsectionalcurvaturebalancedthreefoldlocallyconformallyKählermanifoldGauduchonconnectiontwo-parametercanonicalCherntorsionisoscelesHopf
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper proves two classification results for compact Hermitian manifolds whose holomorphic sectional curvature is constant, or pointwise constant, relative to a canonical connection. For compact balanced threefolds with nonpositive constant Chern holomorphic sectional curvature $c$, it confirms a long-standing conjecture: $c=0$ forces the Chern connection to be flat, and $c<0$ forces the metric to be Kähler and locally complex hyperbolic. For compact locally conformally Kähler (LCK) manifolds, it shows that pointwise constant holomorphic sectional curvature for any Gauduchon or two-parameter canonical connection leaves only two possibilities: the metric is Kähler, or a holomorphic cover is an isosceles Hopf manifold with an admissible metric, with the connection parameter restricted to specific values. If the curvature is globally constant, the non-Kähler possibility collapses to the standard Hopf metric with $c=0$.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object for the LCK part is the conformal curvature identity $R_g = \frac{\beta_t}{2}G_g + \frac{1}{2}L_g(A)$, where $A = f_{i\bar j} - a f_i f_{\bar j}$ and $L_g$ is a linear map from Hermitian symmetric two-tensors to algebraic Kähler curvature tensors. Injectivity of $L_g$ turns the pointwise-constant condition into algebraic constraints, and on the Euclidean cover it reduces the problem to solving $f_{i\bar j} - a f_i f_{\bar j} = -(\beta_t/2)\delta_{ij}$, whose positive solutions are exactly $\xi = e^{-af} = \lambda Q_A$ with $Q_A>0$ and $A A<\frac14 I$. For the balanced threefold part, the central mechanism is the pointwise torsion normal form: at each point there is a unitary frame with only three complex torsion components $T^1_{23}=\tau_1$, $T^2_{31}=\tau_2$, $T^3_{12}=\tau_3$ nonzero, which makes the algebraic curvature-torsion identity collapse to $\operatorname{Re}\langle R(T),T\rangle = c|T|^2$. From that, the two square identities follow by integration by parts on the compact manifold.

What would settle it

Compute the two $L^2$ norms in Theorem 8.7 on any proposed compact balanced threefold with constant Chern holomorphic sectional curvature $c<0$: the identity $\|\nabla^{1,0}T\|_{L^2}^2 = 9c\|T\|_{L^2}^2 - 16\|\sigma\|_{L^2}^2$ forces $T=0$ and $\sigma=0$, so a metric with any nonzero Chern torsion would directly contradict Theorem 1.1. Equivalently, a compact strict LCK manifold with vanishing Tricerri-Vanhecke Bochner tensor whose universal cover is not $(\mathbb{C}^n\setminus\{0\},g_0)$ with deck transformations $\gamma(z)=r_\gamma U_\gamma z$ would break Proposition 5.1 and the LCK classification.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that constant holomorphic sectional curvature, in the Chern/Gauduchon/two-parameter sense, is rigid enough to classify the manifold. For compact balanced threefolds with $c\le 0$, two $L^2$ identities for the Chern torsion $T$ and the trace-free part $\sigma$ of the first Chern-Ricci form, namely $\|\nabla^{0,1}T\|_{L^2}^2 = 32\|\sigma\|_{L^2}^2 - c\|T\|_{L^2}^2$ and $\|\nabla^{1,0}T\|_{L^2}^2 = 9c\|T\|_{L^2}^2 - 16\|\sigma\|_{L^2}^2$, force $T=0$ and $\sigma=0$ when $c<0$, and Chern flatness when $c=0$. For LCK manifolds, lifting to the universal cover turns pointwise constancy into a conformal identity for a Kähler metric $g$; injectivity of the associated linear map makes $g$ Bochner-flat, and the uniformization of compact strict LCK Bochner-flat manifolds yields a Euclidean cover, where the automorphy of the conformal factor forces it to be $\lambda Q_A(z)$ with $Q_A(z)=|z|^2+z^T\!A z+\bar z^T\bar A\bar z$. That is exactly the admissible-metric form on isosceles Hopf manifolds, giving the exceptional case in the LCK theorems.

Load-bearing premise

The LCK part rests on a quoted uniformization theorem rather than a proof in this paper: every compact strictly locally conformally Kähler manifold whose conformally invariant Bochner curvature component vanishes must be, up to scaling, holomorphically isometric to punctured Euclidean space with linear similarity deck transformations.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If Theorem 1.1 is right, the constant Chern holomorphic sectional curvature conjecture is settled for every compact balanced threefold in the nonpositive range: $c=0$ gives Chern flatness and $c<0$ gives a Kähler, locally complex hyperbolic metric.
  • If Theorem 1.2 is right, a compact LCK manifold with pointwise constant Gauduchon holomorphic sectional curvature and parameter outside $\{-1,3\}$ must be Kähler, and the only non-Kähler possibilities are covered by isosceles Hopf manifolds with admissible metrics.
  • The global-constancy assertion implies that any non-Kähler LCK solution with constant holomorphic sectional curvature is rigid: its cover is the standard Hopf metric up to scaling and the curvature constant is $c=0$.
  • For the two-parameter family $D^t_s$, the non-Kähler LCK possibility is tied to the curve $(1-t+ts)^2+s^2=4$; outside that curve, pointwise constancy forces the metric to be Kähler.
  • The Iwasawa-manifold example shows the $c=0$ conclusion is not Kähler rigidity: Chern-flat balanced threefolds can be non-Kähler, so the theorem's dichotomy is sharp.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Editorial inference: the same $L^2$ identities give a concrete testing window for the still-open positive case $c>0$; any non-Kähler compact balanced threefold with constant positive Chern holomorphic sectional curvature would have to satisfy $\frac{c}{32}\|T\|^2 \le \|\sigma\|^2 \le \frac{9c}{16}\|T\|^2$, so a variational or computational search could start inside that band.
  • Editorial inference: the LCK result suggests a broader rigidity heuristic: for canonical metric connections, compactness plus constant holomorphic sectional curvature leaves only similarity quotients of $\mathbb{C}^n\setminus\{0\}$ as non-Kähler exceptions; the same dichotomy could be tested on other Hermitian classes such as pluriclosed or Gauduchon-balanced manifolds.
  • Editorial inference: the admissible-metric potential $Q_A(z)=|z|^2+z^T\!A z+\bar z^T\bar A\bar z$ with $A A<\frac14 I$ is a purely quadratic object, and it would be worth checking whether any compact conformally Kähler metric whose universal cover has such a potential is automatically LCK and Bochner-flat.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. This paper proves two classification results in Hermitian geometry. Theorem 1.1 establishes that a compact balanced threefold with nonpositive constant Chern holomorphic sectional curvature is Chern flat if the constant is zero and Kähler (locally complex hyperbolic after scaling) if the constant is negative; the proof reduces to two L2 identities, (8.42) and (8.43), derived from Chern–Bianchi identities, a torsion normal form, and integration by parts. Theorems 1.2 and 1.3 classify connected compact locally conformally Kähler manifolds whose holomorphic sectional curvature is pointwise constant with respect to any Gauduchon connection or any canonical two-parameter connection D^t_s: such a manifold is either Kähler or has a holomorphic cover that is an isosceles Hopf manifold with an admissible metric, with the parameter restrictions t=-1 or t=3 (Gauduchon) or (t,s) on the Chen–Nie curve (two-parameter case); global constancy forces the standard Hopf metric and zero curvature. The LCK proof uses a conformal change to a Kähler cover, a Bochner-flatness argument, and a quoted uniformization result (Proposition 5.1).

Significance. If correct, Theorem 1.1 confirms a well-known conjecture for a significant class of non-Kähler Hermitian manifolds in complex dimension three, and Theorems 1.2 and 1.3 give a complete classification for compact LCK manifolds across the entire two-parameter family of canonical connections. The paper's main technical contributions are explicit and checkable: the balanced proof supplies two exact square identities (8.42)–(8.43) whose sign structure cleanly separates the zero, negative, and positive cases, including the bounds (8.47) for c>0; the LCK proof carefully tracks the parameter a=(1-t)^2/2 and reduces the strict-LCK case to a Euclidean potential analysis with a clear dichotomy. The proofs are detailed and largely self-contained apart from two quoted inputs: the Zhou–Zheng torsion normal form (Lemma 8.1) and the uniformization Proposition 5.1. The latter is the main point that needs scrutiny in revision.

major comments (2)
  1. [Section 5, Proposition 5.1] The strict-LCK branch of Theorems 1.2 and 1.3 is reduced entirely to Proposition 5.1, which is stated without proof and attributed to Fried [19], Kamishima [25], and Huang-Wan [24]. The proposition asserts a Euclidean uniformization (\tilde M,g) ≅ (C^n\{0}, g_0) and that every deck transformation is of the form γ(z)=r_γ U_γ z. This is a strong statement: it asserts flatness of the Kähler metric on the cover, not merely Bochner-flatness, and it fixes the deck group up to U(n). The hypotheses under which Fried's and Kamishima's theorems apply are not checked in the text (e.g., dimension n=2 versus n≥3, strictness, compactness, and the exact Bochner tensor normalization). Since every subsequent step in §5.2–5.3 and §6.2–6.3 uses this uniformization to convert (5.7) into the Euclidean cover analysis, the Hopf-manifold conclusion rests entirely on this external result. The authors should either include a proof of Proposition 5.1, or state the precise theorem(s) from [19], [25], and [24] that imply it and verify that all hypotheses are satisfied for the manifolds considered. If the cited results do not cover n=2, the n=2 case should be treated separately or excluded.
  2. [Section 8, Lemma 8.1] The algebraic identities in Lemma 8.3 and Proposition 7.2 depend on the pointwise torsion normal form of Zhou and Zheng [43], stated as Lemma 8.1. The lemma is quoted without proof, and the paper does not indicate precisely where in [43] this normal form appears. Since the normal form reduces the Chern torsion of a balanced threefold to three complex components and is the key input for the computations in Lemma 8.3 and the proof of Proposition 7.2, the authors should either supply a proof of Lemma 8.1 or provide a precise reference to the exact statement being used. Without this, the balanced classification in Theorem 1.1 has an unverified load-bearing input.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Section 5.4, near (5.33)] In the displayed expansion preceding (5.33), the terms written as '2z^T A z + 2z^T A z' should be '2z^T A z + 2\bar z^T \bar A \bar z', and '4z^T A A \bar z' should be '4z^T A \bar A \bar z'. As printed, the equation is missing conjugates and is incorrect.
  2. [Section 4.4, equation (4.4)] The equality '0 = ∫_M Δu dV = nF Vol(M)' is only valid after using that F is constant (which follows from dF=0 just above). The text should make this order of reasoning explicit, e.g., write '0 = ∫_M Δu dV = n ∫_M F dV = nF Vol(M)'.
  3. [Section 3.3] The notation 'RG_g' for the real span of the tensor G_g is nonstandard and could be confused with a curvature tensor R; consider writing 'ℝ G_g' or 'span{G_g}'.
  4. [Section 8, proof of Lemma 8.4] The first Bianchi identity in (8.28) is invoked without a reference; a citation to a standard source (e.g., the Chern connection Bianchi identity as in [43]) would help the reader verify the displayed cyclic-sum identity.
  5. [Introduction and references] There are minor typographical issues, including the phrase 'thets-plane' in the introduction and the title of [41] ('Bismut–Strominger parallel torsion' should probably be 'Bismut–Strominger parallel torsion metrics' or similar). These do not affect the mathematics.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the main classifications are derived from external uniformization and torsion-normal-form inputs, not from the paper's own conclusions.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain does not reduce to its inputs by construction. For Theorems 1.2 and 1.3, the strict LCK branch is reduced to Proposition 5.1, which is quoted from Fried, Kamishima, and Huang-Wan as an external classification result. The subsequent derivation of t=-1 or t=3 and of the admissible-metric form is local algebra on the Euclidean cover, using equation (5.7), Lemma 5.2, the automorphy relation (5.16), and the polynomial comparison in Section 5.4; it is not an assumption of the theorem. The globally conformally Kähler case is handled through Bryant's external Bochner-Kähler classification. For Theorem 1.1, the paper cites the Zhou-Zheng torsion normal form (Lemma 8.1) as an external algebraic fact, then derives the square identities (8.42) and (8.43); the c=0 and c<0 conclusions follow from nonnegativity of L2 norms, not from any fitted parameter or imported conclusion. The self-citations [13] and [14] are used for techniques, history, and a stated converse, but are not load-bearing for the forward classifications. Proposition 5.1 is an unproved external dependency and therefore a correctness or foundation concern, not circularity. No specific reduction of a claimed prediction to an input was found.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 8 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No numerical free parameters are fitted to data; geometric constants such as c, r, and λ are determined by the assumptions or by the classification, not chosen to force a conclusion. The proof relies on the external structural theorems listed above, several from the same research program as the authors, but none of these theorems assumes the target conjecture. No new physical or geometric entities are postulated.

assumptions (8)
  • standard math Bryant's compact classification of Bochner-Kähler metrics: every compact Bochner-Kähler manifold is a quotient of a Hermitian symmetric product M^p_c × M^{n-p}_{-c}.
    Used in Section 4.1 to conclude that g_M is locally symmetric and its Ricci tensor is parallel, which drives the vanishing of A^o in Section 4.
  • standard math Fried-Kamishima uniformization (Proposition 5.1): a compact strict LCK manifold with vanishing Tricerri-Vanhecke Bochner tensor has universal Kähler cover (C^n\{0},g0) with deck transformations γ(z)=r_γ U_γ z.
    This is the structural input for the LCK Hopf-cover conclusions in Theorems 1.2 and 1.3; it is cited from [19], [25], and [24], not proved.
  • standard math Zhou-Zheng Lemma 8.1: at each point of a balanced threefold there is a unitary frame making the Chern torsion T^1_23=τ1, T^2_31=τ2, T^3_12=τ3 and all other components vanish.
    The algebraic contractions in Section 8, including Lemmas 8.3 and 8.5 and Proposition 7.2, rely on this pointwise normal form.
  • standard math Liu-Yang formula (8.4): for balanced metrics, ρ^(2) = ρ^(1) - Λ_ω Φ + Q.
    Connects the Chern-Ricci tensors to the torsion form Q and is necessary for identity (8.11).
  • standard math Fusi-Giusti identity (8.8): ∂*∂ω = *(...) in complex dimension three, used to identify ∂*∂ω with *Φ.
    Bridges the integration by parts and Hodge star computation that yields (8.11).
  • standard math Chen-Nie conformal curvature formula (3.1) for t-Gauduchon connections under a conformal change.
    This is the computational starting point for the LCK sections; the paper quotes it without proof.
  • standard math Bochner tensor decomposition K = B ⊕ L_g(H0) ⊕ R G_g, attributed to [1] and [24].
    Justifies projecting R_g to a vanishing Bochner component and hence B_TV(h)=0 in (3.17).
  • standard math Polarization equivalence (2.4): pointwise constancy of holomorphic sectional curvature is equivalent to the symmetrized curvature tensor being κ/2(δijδkℓ + δiℓδkj).
    Used throughout to convert the pointwise curvature assumption into an algebraic tensor equation.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Compact balanced threefolds and LCK manifolds with constant holomorphic sectional curvature." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/7SADPH3Y

@misc{pith2026260805598,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Compact balanced threefolds and LCK manifolds with constant holomorphic sectional curvature},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/7SADPH3Y}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2608.05598}
}
abstract

A long-standing conjecture in Hermitian geometry says that a compact Hermitian manifold with constant Chern holomorphic sectional curvature $c$ is K\"ahler for $c\neq 0$ and Chern flat for $c=0$. Although the conjecture has been established in complex dimension two, it remains open in general in higher dimensions. We verify the conjecture for compact balanced threefolds when $c\leq 0$. For compact locally conformally K\"ahler manifolds, Chen, Chen, and Nie established the case $c\leq 0$, while Huang and Wan recently settled the remaining case. Inspired by the approach of Huang and Wan, we investigate a generalization of the conjecture for canonical metric connections and establish it for connected compact locally conformally K\"ahler manifolds.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

43 extracted references · 41 canonical work pages

  1. [19]

    Fried,Closed similarity manifolds, Comment

    D. Fried,Closed similarity manifolds, Comment. Math. Helv.55(1980), no. 4, 576–582

    work page 1980

  2. [25]

    Kamishima,Heisenberg, spherical CR-geometry and Bochner flat locally conformal Kähler manifolds, Int

    Y. Kamishima,Heisenberg, spherical CR-geometry and Bochner flat locally conformal Kähler manifolds, Int. J. Geom. Methods Mod. Phys.3(2006), no. 5–6, 1089–1116

    work page 2006

  3. [24]

    Compact locally conformal K\"ahler manifolds with constant Chern holomorphic sectional curvature

    Z. Huang and X. Wan,Compact locally conformal Kähler manifolds with constant Chern holomorphic sec- tional curvature, arXiv:2606.24425, 2026

    work page Pith review arXiv 2026

  4. [43]

    Zhou and F

    W. Zhou and F. Zheng,Hermitian threefolds with vanishing real bisectional curvature(in Chinese), Sci. Sin. Math.52(2022), 757–764. Shuwen Chen. School of Mathematical Sciences, Chongqing Normal University, Chongqing 401331, China Email address:3153017458@qq.com Junpeng Li. School of Mathematical Sciences, Zhejiang Normal University, Jinhua, Zhejiang 32100...

    work page 2022

  5. [1]

    D. V. Alekseevskii,Riemannian spaces with exceptional holonomy groups, Funct. Anal. Appl.2(1968), no. 2, 97–105

    work page 1968

  6. [2]

    Apostolov, J

    V. Apostolov, J. Davidov, and O. Muškarov,Compact self-dual Hermitian surfaces, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 348(1996), no. 8, 3051–3063

    work page 1996

  7. [3]

    Balas,Compact Hermitian manifolds of constant holomorphic sectional curvature, Math

    A. Balas,Compact Hermitian manifolds of constant holomorphic sectional curvature, Math. Z.189(1985), 193–210

    work page 1985

  8. [4]

    Z.190(1985), no

    A.BalasandP.Gauduchon,Any Hermitian metric of constant nonpositive (Hermitian) holomorphic sectional curvature on a compact complex surface is Kähler, Math. Z.190(1985), no. 1, 39–43

    work page 1985

Show all 43 references
  1. [5]

    Bismut,A local index theorem for non-Kähler manifolds, Math

    J.-M. Bismut,A local index theorem for non-Kähler manifolds, Math. Ann.284(1989), no. 4, 681–699

    1989

  2. [6]

    Bochner,Curvature and Betti numbers

    S. Bochner,Curvature and Betti numbers. II, Ann. of Math. (2)50(1949), no. 1, 77–93

    1949

  3. [7]

    Boothby,Hermitian manifolds with zero curvature, Michigan Math

    W. Boothby,Hermitian manifolds with zero curvature, Michigan Math. J.5(1958), no. 2, 229–233

    1958

  4. [8]

    R. L. Bryant,Bochner–Kähler metrics, J. Amer. Math. Soc.14(2001), no. 3, 623–715

    2001

  5. [9]

    H. Chen, L. Chen, and X. Nie,Chern–Ricci curvatures, holomorphic sectional curvature and Hermitian metrics, Sci. China Math.64(2021), no. 4, 763–780

    2021

  6. [10]

    Chen and X

    H. Chen and X. Nie,Compact Hermitian surfaces with pointwise constant Gauduchon holomorphic sectional curvature, Math. Z.302(2022), no. 3, 1721–1737

    2022

  7. [11]

    Chen and F

    S. Chen and F. Zheng,On Strominger space forms, J. Geom. Anal.32(2022), no. 4, Paper No. 141, 21 pp

    2022

  8. [12]

    Chen and F

    S. Chen and F. Zheng,Bismut torsion parallel metrics with constant holomorphic sectional curvature, arXiv:2405.09110, 2024

    2024

  9. [13]

    Chen and F

    S. Chen and F. Zheng,Canonical metric connections with constant holomorphic sectional curvature, Pacific J. Math.334(2025), no. 2, 329–348

    2025

  10. [14]

    S.ChenandF.Zheng,Locally conformally Kähler manifolds with constant Levi–Civita or Bismut holomorphic sectional curvature, arXiv:2608.01893v1, 2026

    2026 arXiv

  11. [15]

    Cordero, M

    L. Cordero, M. Fernández, A. Gray, and L. Ugarte,Compact nilmanifolds with nilpotent complex structures: Dolbeault cohomology, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc.352(2000), no. 12, 5405–5433

    2000

  12. [16]

    Davidov, G

    J. Davidov, G. Grantcharov, and O. Muškarov,Curvature properties of the Chern connection of twistor spaces, Rocky Mountain J. Math.39(2009), no. 1, 27–48

    2009

  13. [17]

    Demailly,Complex Analytic and Differential Geometry, Université de Grenoble I, 2012

    J.-P. Demailly,Complex Analytic and Differential Geometry, Université de Grenoble I, 2012. HOLOMORPHIC SECTIONAL CUR V ATURE ON BALANCED AND LCK THREEFOLDS 31

    2012

  14. [18]

    S.DragomirandL.Ornea,Locally Conformal Kähler Geometry, ProgressinMathematics, vol.155, Birkhäuser Boston, Boston, MA, 1998

    1998

  15. [20]

    J. Fu, Z. Wang, and D. Wu,Semilinear equations, theγk function, and generalized Gauduchon metrics, J. Eur. Math. Soc.15(2013), no. 2, 659–680

    2013

  16. [21]

    Fusi and F

    E. Fusi and F. Giusti,Blowing up Chern–Ricci flat balanced metrics, J. Math. Pures Appl.197(2025), Article 103691

    2025

  17. [22]

    Gauduchon,La1-forme de torsion d’une variété hermitienne compacte, Math

    P. Gauduchon,La1-forme de torsion d’une variété hermitienne compacte, Math. Ann.267(1984), no. 4, 495–518

    1984

  18. [23]

    Gauduchon,Hermitian connections and Dirac operators, Boll

    P. Gauduchon,Hermitian connections and Dirac operators, Boll. Un. Mat. Ital. B (7)11(1997), no. 2, suppl., 257–288

    1997

  19. [26]

    G. Khan, B. Yang, and F. Zheng,The set of all orthogonal complex structures on the flat6-tori, Adv. Math. 319(2017), 451–471

    2017

  20. [27]

    Li and F

    Y. Li and F. Zheng,Complex nilmanifolds with constant holomorphic sectional curvature, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc.150(2022), 319–326

    2022

  21. [28]

    Li and F

    Y. Li and F. Zheng,A note on almost abelian groups with constant holomorphic sectional curvature, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc.153(2025), no. 12, 5369–5383

    2025

  22. [29]

    Liu and X

    K. Liu and X. Yang,Ricci curvatures on Hermitian manifolds, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc.369(2017), 5157– 5196

    2017

  23. [30]

    Ma and X

    F. Ma and X. Nie,A remark on compact balanced threefolds with constant holomorphic sectional curvature, Kodai Math. J.47(2024), no. 1, 90–98

    2024

  24. [31]

    M. L. Michelsohn,On the existence of special metrics in complex geometry, Acta Math.149(1982), 261–295

    1982

  25. [32]

    Ornea and M

    L. Ornea and M. Verbitsky,Principles of Locally Conformally Kähler Geometry, Progress in Mathematics, vol. 354, Birkhäuser, Cham, 2024

    2024

  26. [33]

    Otal and L

    A. Otal and L. Ugarte,Six-dimensional homogeneous spaces with holomorphically trivial canonical bundle, J. Geom. Phys.194(2023), Article 105014

    2023

  27. [34]

    Rao and F

    P. Rao and F. Zheng,Pluriclosed manifolds with constant holomorphic sectional curvature, Acta Math. Sin. (Engl. Ser.)38(2022), no. 6, 1094–1104

    2022

  28. [35]

    Sato and K

    T. Sato and K. Sekigawa,Hermitian surfaces of constant holomorphic sectional curvature, Math. Z.205 (1990), 659–668

    1990

  29. [36]

    Strominger,Superstrings with torsion, Nuclear Phys

    A. Strominger,Superstrings with torsion, Nuclear Phys. B274(1986), 253–284

    1986

  30. [37]

    Tang,Holomorphic sectional curvature and Kähler-like metric(in Chinese), Sci

    K. Tang,Holomorphic sectional curvature and Kähler-like metric(in Chinese), Sci. Sin. Math.51(2021), no. 12, 2013–2024

    2021

  31. [38]

    Wang and F

    Q. Wang and F. Zheng,Balanced Bismut torsion-parallel fourfold with constant holomorphic sectional cur- vature, arXiv:2608.00457, 2026

    2026 arXiv

  32. [39]

    Yang and F

    X. Yang and F. Zheng,On real bisectional curvature for Hermitian manifolds, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc.371 (2019), no. 4, 2703–2718

    2019

  33. [40]

    Zhao and F

    Q. Zhao and F. Zheng,On Gauduchon Kähler-like manifolds, J. Geom. Anal.32(2022), no. 4, Paper No. 110, 27 pp

    2022

  34. [41]

    Zhao and F

    Q. Zhao and F. Zheng,On Hermitian manifolds with Bismut–Strominger parallel torsion, arXiv:2208.03071, 2022

    2022 arXiv

  35. [42]

    Zhao and F

    Q. Zhao and F. Zheng,Curvature characterization of Hermitian manifolds with Bismut parallel torsion, arXiv:2407.10497, 2024

    2024 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 8, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.