Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 77 references

The plunging region of thin accretion discs across the black hole spin range

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read This paper argues that magnetic stresses in the plunging region of a thin accretion disc increase with prograde black hole spin, and that this trend cuts across the degenerate spin-stress pairings that complicate X-ray spin measurements.

desk verdict A careful extension of the MB23 plunging-region framework across eight black hole spins, with a genuinely useful new flux-freezing model, but the headline spin-stress trend rests on a resolution mismatch between the high-res a=0 run and the half-res Kerr runs, so treat that trend as provisional pending a convergence check. read the letter →

arxiv 2608.06278 v1 pith:HEIUN7WC submitted 2026-08-06 astro-ph.HE

Jake Rule , Andrew Mummery , Steven Balbus , James M. Stone , Lizhong Zhang This is my paper
classification astro-ph.HE
keywords blackholespinplungingregionISCOstressGRMHDsimulationsfluxfreezingthinaccretiondiscsspin-stressdegeneracydiscspectra
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper uses eight three-dimensional general-relativistic magnetohydrodynamic simulations, spanning black hole spins from retrograde a=-0.9 to prograde a=+0.9, to test whether the innermost plunging flow of a thin accretion disc can be described by simple analytic models. It finds that the fluid follows gravity-dominated geodesic infall closely, with the best agreement at low spins, and that the earlier analytic plunge model (MB23) describes the density and temperature profiles once an ad-hoc non-adiabatic heating term is included. It then derives a flux-freezing model for the magnetic fields in the plunge, in which the field is passively advected by the geodesic inflow, and shows that the magnitude of the magnetic stress at the ISCO rises steeply as spin is increased in the prograde direction. Because this spin-stress curve runs approximately orthogonally to the contour of degenerate spin-stress pairings fitted to the X-ray spectrum of M33 X-7, the paper concludes that the observational degeneracy between spin and ISCO stress is not fundamental, so in principle both quantities can be determined together.

What carries the argument

The machinery is a flux-freezing model for the magnetic field in the plunge. Starting from the covariant induction equation of ideal GRMHD for a steady, axisymmetric flow, and assuming the four-velocity is the fixed geodesic inflow of the MB23 offset model, the paper vertically integrates the equation with a Gaussian vertical ansatz and obtains closed-form expressions for the magnetic field components b^r, b^φ, $b^{0}$ (Eqs. 14-16) that depend only on the inflow speed, the scale height, and the field values at the ISCO. Multiplying these gives the magnetic stress -b^r b_φ and a prediction for the Shakura-Sunyaev α profile (Eqs. 27-29), which reproduces the characteristic rise-and-fall of α across the plunging region. The spin ordering of the stress enters through the geodesic inflow and the ISCO boundary values: stronger shear at higher prograde spin amplifies the toroidal field before the plunge and sets the stress level carried to the horizon.

What would settle it

Re-run one prograde simulation, say a=0.7 or a=0.9, at the same resolution as the high-resolution a=0 run (same seed, same cooling) and measure the dimensionless ISCO stress; if the stress falls below the value found at lower spin, or fails to lie above the a=0.5 value, the reported monotonic increase is not robust. Alternatively, re-seed a single spin with a different initial poloidal loop structure and check whether the resulting stress varies by more than the spread between adjacent spins.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On its own terms, the paper's central claim is that the MHD stress in the plunging region is strongly coupled to the black hole spin, increasing monotonically with prograde spin, and that this coupling is approximately orthogonal to the contour of degenerate spin-stress pairings that arise when fitting X-ray spectra. The mechanism is shear amplification: as prograde spin increases, the ISCO moves deeper into the potential well, fluid orbits just outside it are faster and more strongly sheared, and the same shear that feeds the magneto-rotational instability winds toroidal field out of poloidal field; the short plunge time then preserves this ordering of field strength down to the horizon. The paper demonstrates the point explicitly by overlaying its measured spin-stress values on the chi-squared map for the black hole binary M33 X-7, where the simulation trend crosses the best-fit region rather than running along it.

Load-bearing premise

The claim that stress rises with prograde spin assumes the eight simulations are directly comparable: each uses a single magnetic-field seed, an ad-hoc cooling function, and all Kerr-spin runs were made at half the resolution of the high-resolution spin-zero run, so the trend could be a numerical artifact of resolution or field configuration rather than a physical property.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the stress-spin relation is correct, spectral fits of thermal disc emission should treat the ISCO stress as spin-dependent rather than as a fully free parameter, which narrows the allowed spin solutions.
  • The MB23 thermodynamic framework plus flux-freezing describes the plunging region across the spin range, so the same analytic machinery can be used to model observed discs without a separate simulation for each spin.
  • The Shakura-Sunyaev alpha parameter is not a constant or a local viscosity in the plunging region; it rises and then falls across the plunge, so global stress models need to be used for the inner disc.
  • For the fastest prograde spins (a≈0.9), the geodesic approximation is least accurate and the plunging region is small, so deviations there are expected to matter less observably; retrograde discs have the largest plunging regions and the weakest stresses.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A natural next step is to repeat one or two spins with a different magnetic-field initialisation, such as a stronger or multipolar seed, to test whether the monotonic stress increase persists beyond the single 4-loop configuration used here.
  • The simulated spin-stress curve could be used as a prior in spectral fitting codes, converting the degeneracy demonstration into an actual spin measurement for sources like M33 X-7.
  • The ordered, frozen-in field geometry predicted by the model should be observable in polarized optically thin emission from the plunge, giving a polarimetric test that does not rely on the thermal spectrum alone.
  • If the trend holds to near-extremal spins, the enhanced plunging-region stress implies an additional source of high-energy emission that grows with spin, which may be relevant to the hard excesses seen in some black hole X-ray binaries.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper presents a suite of eight 3D GRMHD simulations of thin accretion discs in the plunging region across black hole spins a/M = {-0.9, -0.5, 0.0, 0.3, 0.5, 0.6, 0.7, 0.9}, extending the earlier Schwarzschild study of Rule et al. (2025). The authors test the Mummery & Balbus (2023) geodesic thermodynamic framework, develop a new analytic flux-freezing model for the magnetic field in the plunging region, and report that the magnitude of the MHD stress in the plunging region increases monotonically with prograde spin. They use this trend to argue that the observational spin-stress degeneracy is not fundamental, illustrating the point with a X-ray spectral fit of M33 X-7. The paper is clearly written, technically detailed, and candid about limitations, including the ad-hoc cooling function, the single magnetic-field initialisation per spin, and the reduced resolution of all Kerr-spin runs relative to the a=0 run.

Significance. If the reported spin-stress trend holds, it would be an important step toward breaking the spin-stress degeneracy in continuum-fitting and X-ray spectral modelling of black hole accretion discs. The paper's strongest asset is the parameter-free geodesic self-similar prediction in Eq. (1), which shows good agreement across the spin range and gives the dynamics a non-circular, falsifiable core. The flux-freezing model in Section 4 is a useful analytic extension of the MB23 framework, and the derived closed-form expressions for the magnetic field components will be of practical value to the community. The authors are also appropriately cautious in Section 5 that the M33 X-7 overlay is a demonstration, not a spin measurement. However, the central new quantitative claim—the monotonic spin-stress relation—currently rests on comparisons between runs of different numerical resolution and single realisations per spin, and is therefore not yet established at the level needed to support the orthogonality argument.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section 2; Figs. 4, 5, 6] The central spin-stress trend is not controlled for numerical resolution. Section 2 states that all Kerr-spin simulations use a minimum cell spacing of 0.05 r_g, a factor of two coarser than the high-resolution a=0 run. The a=0 run is therefore the anchor point against which all Kerr results are compared, and it is the only point at high resolution. In Fig. 5 the high-resolution a=0 shell-integrated flux lies above the lower-resolution a=0.3 run, breaking the otherwise monotonic ordering the authors attribute to polar-region inflow; this shows that resolution or measurement details do affect the comparison. No convergence test is presented for any spin, and the high-spin runs, which drive the trend, have the smallest plunging region in proper time and are the most sensitive to resolution. Until a matched-resolution comparison (e.g., a high-resolution a=0.3 or a=0.7 run, or a resolution study for at least two spins) is shown, the monotonic increase in plunging-region stress reported in Figs. 4 and 6, and the orthogonality argument built on it in Section 5, is not established.
  2. [Section 5; Fig. 10] The orthogonality claim rests on the specific set of delta-J values plotted in Fig. 10, which inherit the resolution and single-initialisation caveats raised above. The authors connect the simulation points with a straight line as a visual aid, but the actual functional form of the spin-stress relation is not modelled; the intersection with the M33 X-7 chi-squared banana is therefore suggestive rather than quantitative. To support the statement that 'the degeneracy is not fundamental', the authors should either provide a matched-resolution trend or explicitly frame the conclusion as conditional on the current numerical setup. The caveat that this is not a spin measurement is welcome, but the stronger claim about breaking the degeneracy needs a firmer basis.
  3. [Section 4; Fig. 8] The flux-freezing model is fitted to the same simulated profiles from which it is tested: U^r_I is fixed to the simulated ISCO crossing velocity, and H_I b^r_I and H_I b^phi_I are free parameters fit to the b^r and b^phi profiles. The good agreement in Fig. 8 is therefore a consistency check of the functional form rather than an independent parameter-free prediction. In addition, the assumed vertical structure (b^mu = b-tilde^mu(R) exp(-z^2/H^2)) and the neglect of b^z are introduced without a quantitative comparison to the simulated vertical profiles. The authors should either provide such a comparison or soften the 'good concordance' claim to acknowledge that the model's vertical-structure assumptions are untested.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Throughout] There are several typographical issues: 'Schwarzchild' is misspelled in Sections 2 and 6, and Section 3.2 contains the phrase 'We find the best agreement for the for the low-spin'. The paper would benefit from a careful proofreading pass.
  2. [Section 2] The '4-loop magnetic field configuration' is referenced but not described; a brief definition or citation would help the reader assess how typical this initial condition is relative to other field topologies used in the literature.
  3. [Section 3.2, Fig. 3] The density fits in Fig. 3 use a per-simulation fitted K power-law index m and fitted epsilon and normalisation, so the agreement shown is partly a measure of the flexibility of the fitting function rather than the predictive power of the MB23 model. The paper should state this more prominently, especially since the retrograde K profiles in Fig. 2 visibly deviate from the power-law form.
  4. [Section 4, Eq. (19)] The scale height h_rho defined in Eq. (19) uses a density-weighted average of |theta - pi/2|; this is a reasonable operational definition, but it is worth stating explicitly that this is an effective vertical thickness and not the Gaussian scale height H used in the analytic model, since the two appear in the same equations.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circular derivation: the parameter-free geodesic profile and the directly measured spin-stress trend are independent of the fitted model comparisons, and the self-cited prior work is either tested against new simulations or anchored to external X-ray data.

full rationale

The paper's central non-circular core is the geodesic inflow test: Eq. 1 is a parameter-free, spin-independent radial profile that is compared directly with the simulated √r_I U^r profiles, with no fitted constants entering that comparison. The spin-stress trend in Section 3.3 is measured directly from the simulations (the fractional angular-momentum drop δJ and the shell-integrated Maxwell flux in Eq. 4), not derived from the analytic model or from the M33 X-7 degeneracy contour; the contour is then used only as an external overlay to interpret the measured trend. The thermodynamic and magnetic-field comparisons do involve fitted parameters: the K power-law, ε, the density normalization, and the ISCO field components H_I b^r_I and H_I b^φ_I are all fitted to the simulated profiles they are compared against. However, the paper explicitly labels these as best-fit models rather than parameter-free predictions, and no equation in the paper sets the model output equal to the simulation by construction. The radial shapes being compared, such as the 1/r scaling of H b^r and the shear-driven growth of b^φ, are not identities forced by the fitted constants, so the agreement is evidence of model flexibility rather than circularity. The MB23 and R25 references are self-citations, but they are used as analytic frameworks and simulation set-ups that this paper independently tests against a new spin survey, not as unverified uniqueness claims. The Mummery et al. (2025) degeneracy contour is anchored to a public M33 X-7 X-ray spectrum, making it external evidence that does not reduce to the present paper's fitted values. The resolution mismatch between the high-resolution a=0 run and the half-resolution Kerr runs is a legitimate numerical-correctness concern, but it is not a circularity: the measured trend is not equivalent to its inputs by definition. Overall, the derivation chain is self-contained where it claims prediction, and transparently calibrated where it claims agreement; no step reduces to its own inputs by construction.

Assumptions & free parameters 5 free parameters · 8 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on the MB23 assumptions, the Gaussian vertical ansatz, and per-simulation fitted boundary values. The geodesic profile (Eq. 1) is parameter-free, but the thermodynamic and magnetic-field comparisons rely on multiple fitted parameters.

free parameters (5)
  • U^r_I (offset radial 4-velocity at ISCO) = per simulation, set to simulated value at ISCO
    Free parameter of the offset geodesic model; enters Eq. 3 via epsilon and is fixed to the simulated U^r at the ISCO for the flux-freezing model (Section 4).
  • K power-law index m = per simulation, best fit to Fig 2
    Ad-hoc entropy model K=K_I (r/r_I)^{-m}; retrograde simulations deviate noticeably, but the paper keeps it for all spins (Section 3.2).
  • epsilon and density normalization in Eq. 3 = per simulation, best fit to density profiles
    epsilon is proportional to U^r_I and the normalization is rho_I; both fitted to each simulated density profile (Section 3.2, Fig 3).
  • H_I b^r_I and H_I b^phi_I = per simulation, simultaneous fit in Fig 8
    Boundary magnetic field amplitudes at the ISCO, fitted to the simulated h_rho b^r and h_rho b^phi profiles (Section 4).
  • beta_I, tau_I, U^r_I for alpha model = fit to simulated alpha profile (Fig 9)
    Parameters of the analytic alpha model; determined by minimizing squared distance to the simulated profile (Section 4).
assumptions (8)
  • standard math Kerr spacetime geometry and circular ISCO orbits (Bardeen et al. 1972)
    Defines the ISCO, geodesic plunge solutions, and coordinate systems used throughout.
  • standard math Ideal GRMHD induction equation for steady, axisymmetric flow (Eq. 8)
    Basis of the flux-freezing model in Section 4.
  • domain assumption Gravity dominates plunging-flow dynamics; magnetic and pressure forces are dynamically sub-dominant
    MB23 assumption (i); asserted in Section 3.1 and used to pre-specify U^mu with no back-reaction in Section 4.
  • ad hoc to paper Vertical structure b^mu = b~^mu(R) exp(-z^2/H^2) with U^mu = U~^mu(R)
    Ansatz chosen in Section 4 to vertically integrate the induction equation; the paper notes the flow is actually stratified.
  • ad hoc to paper b^z is negligible (b^z << b^R, b^phi, b^0)
    Assumed in Section 4; retaining b^z would change the predicted radial-field profile.
  • ad hoc to paper Constant offset geodesic model with free U^r_I at the ISCO
    MB23 device to regularize the ISCO crossing; footnote 9 admits it makes U^mu U_mu not equal -1, a minor departure.
  • ad hoc to paper Ad-hoc power-law K model for non-adiabatic heating
    Section 3.2 placeholder for magnetic dissipation; weak agreement for retrograde spins.
  • domain assumption MRI reaches a similar non-linear saturation state at the ISCO across spins
    Used in Section 3.3 to interpret the ordering of b^r at the ISCO.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of The plunging region of thin accretion discs across the black hole spin range." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/HEIUN7WC

@misc{pith2026260806278,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: The plunging region of thin accretion discs across the black hole spin range},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/HEIUN7WC}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2608.06278}
}
read the original abstract

We compute and test analytic models for the plunging region dynamics, thermodynamics, and magnetic fields against dedicated 3D global general relativistic magnetohydrodynamics (MHD) simulations of thin accretion discs around black holes across the spin range, using the code {\tt ATHENAK}. We find that the dynamics of the plunging fluid closely resembles that of a gravity-dominated geodesic plunge, with the best agreement at low spins. Additionally, we find good agreement between the thermodynamic framework and the simulated quantities across the spin range. Finally, we develop a new model for the magnetic fields in the plunging region that assumes a fixed geodesic inflow, into which the magnetic fields are frozen. Overall, our simulations are in good concordance with this model, albeit with some discrepancies that suggest a degree of non-ideal MHD dissipation. In addition, we investigate how the MHD stresses in the plunging region depend on the black hole spin, interpreting our results through the lens of our flux-freezing model. We find that the magnitude of the stress increases as the black hole spin is increased in the prograde direction. This question is of particular importance for observers who wish to determine the black hole spin from X-ray measurements of the inner accretion disc, since a low-stress, high-spin solution is degenerate with a high-stress, low-spin solution. The spin-stress relationship that we report is approximately orthogonal to the contour of degenerate spin-stress pairings, indicating that the degeneracy is not fundamental. We show this explicitly for the case of M33 X-7.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2608.06278 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. The radial 4-velocity (𝑈𝑟 ), both unscaled (top-left) and scaled by √ 𝑟𝐼 (bottom), and the azimuthal 4-velocity (𝑈𝜙) (top-right). The solid dotted lines are the density-weighted, temporally, azimuthally and vertically averaged quantities for each simulation. The dashed line in the bottom panel is the (spin independent) radial geodesic solution (see Cunningham 1975; Mummery & Balbus 2022), whilst the dashed lines in … view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. The plunging region radial 𝐾 = 𝑃𝜌−𝛾 profile, normalised to the value at the ISCO. Solid dotted lines show the normalised vertically, az￾imuthally and temporally averaged profiles, ⟨𝐾⟩𝑡 𝜙 𝜃 /𝐾𝐼 . The shaded regions represent a ±1𝜎 standard deviation measured by the temporal variance of the spatially averaged quantities during the averaging window (see Rule et al. 2025). the simulated 𝐾 profiles in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:f… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. The plunging region radial density profile of each simulation, normalised to the value at the ISCO. Solid lines indicate the normalised vertically, azimuthally and temporally averaged density profiles, ⟨𝜌⟩𝑡 𝜙 𝜃 /𝜌𝐼 . The shaded regions represent a ±1𝜎 temporal standard deviation (see R25). The dashed lines are fitted MB23 density models for each simulated profile. It is important to note that we model 𝐾 with a diffe… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (6 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: The specific angular momentum 𝑈𝜙, normalised by the angular momentum of a circular orbit at the ISCO 𝐽𝐼 (left) and the fractional change in the specific angular momentum as a function of spin, 𝛿J (right). The solid lines on the left are the density-weighted, temporally…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Time averaged radial profiles of the shell integrated radial flux of angular momentum (𝐽¤mag) of magnetic origin normalised by the mass accretion rate (𝑀¤ ) for each simulation. The shaded region indicates a ±1𝜎 standard deviation. where 𝜖 𝜇𝜈𝛼𝛽 is the anti-symmetric Le…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Clockwise starting from the top-left: the magnitude of the 𝑟 and 𝜙 contravariant components of the magnetic 4-vector (|𝑏 𝑟 | and |𝑏 𝜙 |). |𝑏𝜙 |, the magnitude of the covariant 𝜙 component of the same vector (bottom-right). Finally, the 𝑟 − 𝜙 component of the magnetic s…
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: The magnetic field in the disc mid-plane (𝑧 = 0) at the end-point of the simulations (𝑡/𝑡𝑔 = 25, 000). The colour map shows the electromagnetic energy density (𝑢mag), whilst the streamlines show the orientation of the spatial magnetic four-vector field lines, 𝑏 𝑥 and 𝑏…
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: The components of the magnetic four-vector, 𝑏 𝜇 , multiplied by the scale height, ℎ𝜌 as a function of radius. Clockwise from the top-left: ℎ𝜌𝑏 𝑟 , ℎ𝜌𝑏 𝜙 and ℎ𝜌𝑏 0 . The solid lines indicate the temporally, vertically and azimuthally averaged simulated profiles. The das…
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_9.png]

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

77 extracted references · 17 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Abramowicz, M. A. and Lanza, A. and Percival, M. J. , year =. Accretion. The Astrophysical Journal , volume =. doi:10.1086/303869 , urldate =

    doi:10.1086/303869

  2. [2]

    , year =

    Agol, Eric and Krolik, Julian H. , year =. Magnetic. The Astrophysical Journal , volume =. doi:10.1086/308177 , urldate =

    doi:10.1086/308177

  3. [3]

    2017 , month = nov, journal =

    The General Relativistic Thin Disc Evolution Equation , author =. 2017 , month = nov, journal =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stx1955 , urldate =

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stx1955 2017

  4. [4]

    1998 , month = jan, journal =

    Instability, Turbulence, and Enhanced Transport in Accretion Disks , author =. 1998 , month = jan, journal =. doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.70.1 , urldate =

    doi:10.1103/revmodphys.70.1 1998

  5. [5]

    and Hawley, John F

    Balbus, Steven A. and Hawley, John F. , year =. A. The Astrophysical Journal , volume =. doi:10.1086/170270 , urldate =

    doi:10.1086/170270

  6. [6]

    Maintaining

    Balsara, Dinshaw S and Spicer, Daniel , year =. Maintaining. Journal of Computational Physics , volume =. doi:10.1006/jcph.1998.6108 , urldate =

    arXiv 1998

  7. [7]

    and Krolik, Julian H

    Beckwith, Kris and Hawley, John F. and Krolik, Julian H. , year =. The. The Astrophysical Journal , volume =. doi:10.1086/533492 , urldate =

    doi:10.1086/533492

  8. [8]

    , year =

    Beckwith, Kris and Stone, James M. , year =. A. The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series , volume =. doi:10.1088/0067-0049/193/1/6 , urldate =

    doi:10.1088/0067-0049/193/1/6

Show all 77 references
  1. [9]

    2008 , month = oct, journal =

    Where Is the Radiation Edge in Magnetized Black Hole Accretion Discs? , author =. 2008 , month = oct, journal =. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.13710.x , urldate =

    2008

  2. [10]

    Blandford, R. D. and Znajek, R. L. , year =. Electromagnetic Extraction of Energy from. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , volume =. doi:10.1093/mnras/179.3.433 , urldate =

    doi

  3. [11]

    and Lindquist, Richard W

    Boyer, Robert H. and Lindquist, Richard W. , year =. Maximal. Journal of Mathematical Physics , volume =. doi:10.1063/1.1705193 , urldate =

    doi

  4. [12]

    and Woodward, Paul R

    Colella, P. and Woodward, Paul R. , year =. The. Journal of Computational Physics , volume =. doi:10.1016/0021-9991(84)90143-8 , urldate =

    doi

  5. [13]

    Cunningham, C. T. , year =. The Effects of Redshifts and Focusing on the Spectrum of an Accretion Disk around a. The Astrophysical Journal , volume =. doi:10.1086/154033 , urldate =

    doi

  6. [14]

    , year =

    Dhang, Prasun and Dexter, Jason and Begelman, Mitchell C. , year =. Energy. The Astrophysical Journal , volume =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ada76e , urldate =

    doi

  7. [15]

    and Gammie, Charles F

    Dhruv, Vedant and Prather, Ben and Wong, George N. and Gammie, Charles F. , year =. A. The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series , volume =. doi:10.3847/1538-4365/adaea6 , urldate =

    doi

  8. [16]

    Einfeldt, Bernd , year =. On. SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis , volume =. doi:10.1137/0725021 , urldate =

    doi

  9. [17]

    Fishbone, L. G. and Moncrief, V. , year =. Relativistic Fluid Disks in Orbit around. The Astrophysical Journal , volume =. doi:10.1086/154565 , urldate =

    doi

  10. [18]

    , year =

    Frank, Juhan and King, Andrew and Raine, Derek J. , year =. Accretion. Accretion Power in Astrophysics , publisher =

  11. [19]

    , year =

    Gammie, Charles F. , year =. Efficiency of. The Astrophysical Journal , volume =. doi:10.1086/312207 , urldate =

    doi

  12. [20]

    and McKinney, Jonathan C

    Gammie, Charles F. and McKinney, Jonathan C. and T. 2003 , month = may, journal =. doi:10.1086/374594 , urldate =

    2003 doi

  13. [21]

    2025 , month = apr, publisher =

    The Inner Structure and Thermodynamics of a Thin Accretion Disc , author =. 2025 , month = apr, publisher =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2504.21207 , urldate =

    2025 doi arXiv

  14. [22]

    and van Leer, Bram , year =

    Harten, Amiram and Lax, Peter D. and van Leer, Bram , year =. On. SIAM Review , volume =. doi:10.1137/1025002 , urldate =

    doi

  15. [23]

    and Guan, Xiaoyue and Krolik, Julian H

    Hawley, John F. and Guan, Xiaoyue and Krolik, Julian H. , year =. The Astrophysical Journal , volume =. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/738/1/84 , urldate =

    doi

  16. [24]

    Hobson, M. P. and Efstathiou, G. P. and Lasenby, A. N. , year =. General. General Relativity , doi =

  17. [25]

    2021 , month = jan, journal =

    Robust Recovery of Primitive Variables in Relativistic Ideal Magnetohydrodynamics , author =. 2021 , month = jan, journal =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.103.023018 , urldate =

    2021 doi

  18. [26]

    Kerr, R. P. and Schild, A. , year =. A New Class of Vacuum Solutions of the

  19. [27]

    , year =

    Kolmogorov, A. , year =. The. Akademiia Nauk SSSR Doklady , volume =

  20. [28]

    Krolik, J. H. , year =. Magnetized. The Astrophysical Journal , volume =. doi:10.1086/311979 , urldate =

    doi

  21. [29]

    and Penna, Robert F

    Kulkarni, Akshay K. and Penna, Robert F. and Shcherbakov, Roman V. and Steiner, James F. and Narayan, Ramesh and S. Measuring Black Hole Spin by the Continuum-Fitting Method: Effect of Deviations from the. 2011 , month = jun, journal =. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.18446.x , urldate =

    2011

  22. [30]

    and Tchekhovskoy, A

    Liska, M. and Tchekhovskoy, A. and Ingram, A. and. Bardeen-. 2019 , month = jul, journal =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stz834 , urldate =

    2019 doi

  23. [31]

    Liska, M. T. P. and Chatterjee, K. and Issa, D. and Yoon, D. and Kaaz, N. and Tchekhovskoy, A. and. H-. 2022 , month = dec, journal =. doi:10.3847/1538-4365/ac9966 , urldate =

    2022 doi

  24. [32]

    and Tchekhovskoy, A

    Liska, M. and Tchekhovskoy, A. and Quataert, E. , year =. Large-Scale Poloidal Magnetic Field Dynamo Leads to Powerful Jets in. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , volume =. doi:10.1093/mnras/staa955 , urldate =

    doi

  25. [33]

    2014 , month = aug, journal =

    High-Order Conservative Reconstruction Schemes for Finite Volume Methods in Cylindrical and Spherical Coordinates , author =. 2014 , month = aug, journal =. doi:10.1016/j.jcp.2014.04.001 , urldate =

    2014 doi

  26. [34]

    and Davis, Shane W

    Mills, Brianna S. and Davis, Shane W. and Jiang, Yan-Fei and Middleton, Matthew J. , year =. Spectral. The Astrophysical Journal , volume =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad6b21 , urldate =

    doi

  27. [35]

    Accretion within the Innermost Stable Circular Orbit: Analytical Thermodynamic Solutions in the Adiabatic Limit , shorttitle =

    Mummery, Andrew and Balbus, Steven , year =. Accretion within the Innermost Stable Circular Orbit: Analytical Thermodynamic Solutions in the Adiabatic Limit , shorttitle =. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , volume =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stad641 , urldate =

    doi

  28. [36]

    2024 , month = jun, journal =

    Continuum Emission from within the Plunging Region of Black Hole Discs , author =. 2024 , month = jun, journal =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stae1160 , urldate =

    2024 doi

  29. [37]

    2024 , month = apr, journal =

    The Dynamics of Accretion Flows near to the Innermost Stable Circular Orbit , author =. 2024 , month = apr, journal =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stae701 , urldate =

    2024 doi

  30. [38]

    Inspirals from the

    Mummery, Andrew and Balbus, Steven , year =. Inspirals from the. Physical Review Letters , volume =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.129.161101 , urldate =

    doi

  31. [39]

    Plunging Region Emission in the

    Mummery, Andrew and Jiang, Jiachen and Fabian, Andrew , year =. Plunging Region Emission in the. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , volume =. doi:10.1093/mnrasl/slae056 , urldate =

    doi

  32. [40]

    2025 , month = dec, journal =

    A Rapid Black Hole Spin or Emission from the Plunging Region? , author =. 2025 , month = dec, journal =. doi:10.1093/mnras/staf1758 , urldate =

    2025 doi

  33. [41]

    2024 , month = aug, journal =

    The Three-Dimensional Structure of Black Hole Accretion Flows within the Plunging Region , author =. 2024 , month = aug, journal =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stae1643 , urldate =

    2024 doi

  34. [42]

    Jets in Magnetically Arrested Hot Accretion Flows: Geometry, Power, and Black Hole Spin-Down , shorttitle =

    Narayan, Ramesh and Chael, Andrew and Chatterjee, Koushik and Ricarte, Angelo and Curd, Brandon , year =. Jets in Magnetically Arrested Hot Accretion Flows: Geometry, Power, and Black Hole Spin-Down , shorttitle =. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , volume =. ...

    doi

  35. [43]

    and Abramowicz, Marek A

    Narayan, Ramesh and Igumenshchev, Igor V. and Abramowicz, Marek A. , year =. Magnetically. Publications of the Astronomical Society of Japan , volume =. doi:10.1093/pasj/55.6.L69 , urldate =

    doi

  36. [44]

    and Krolik, Julian H

    Noble, Scott C. and Krolik, Julian H. and Hawley, John F. , year =. Dependence of. The Astrophysical Journal , volume =. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/711/2/959 , urldate =

    doi

  37. [45]

    and Krolik, Julian H

    Noble, Scott C. and Krolik, Julian H. and Hawley, John F. , year =. Direct. The Astrophysical Journal , volume =. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/692/1/411 , urldate =

    doi

  38. [46]

    and Gammie, Charles F

    Noble, Scott C. and Gammie, Charles F. and McKinney, Jonathan C. and Del Zanna, Luca , year =. Primitive. The Astrophysical Journal , volume =. doi:10.1086/500349 , urldate =

    doi

  39. [47]

    , author =

    Astrophysics of Black Holes. , author =. 1973 , month = jan, pages =

    1973

  40. [48]

    and Thorne, Kip S

    Page, Don N. and Thorne, Kip S. , year =. Disk-. The Astrophysical Journal , volume =. doi:10.1086/152990 , urldate =

    doi

  41. [49]

    and McKinney, Jonathan C

    Penna, Robert F. and McKinney, Jonathan C. and Narayan, Ramesh and Tchekhovskoy, Alexander and Shafee, Rebecca and McClintock, Jeffrey E. , year =. Simulations of Magnetized Discs around Black Holes: Effects of Black Hole Spin, Disc Thickness and Magnetic Field Geometry , shor...

  42. [50]

    and Mizuno, Yosuke and Anninos, Peter and Baker, John G

    Porth, Oliver and Chatterjee, Koushik and Narayan, Ramesh and Gammie, Charles F. and Mizuno, Yosuke and Anninos, Peter and Baker, John G. and Bugli, Matteo and Chan, Chi-kwan and Davelaar, Jordy and Del Zanna, Luca and Etienne, Zachariah B. and Fragile, P. Chris and Kelly, Ber...

    2019 doi

  43. [51]

    , year =

    Reynolds, Christopher S. , year =. Observational. Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics , volume =. doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-112420-035022 , urldate =

    doi

  44. [52]

    and Zhang, Lizhong , year =

    Rule, Jake and Mummery, Andrew and Balbus, Steven and Stone, James M. and Zhang, Lizhong , year =. The Plunging Region of a Thin Accretion Disc around a. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , volume =. doi:10.1093/mnras/staf1256 , urldate =

    doi

  45. [53]

    2024 , month = jan, journal =

    Magnetic Support, Wind-Driven Accretion, Coronal Heating, and Fast Outflows in a Thin Magnetically Arrested Disc , author =. 2024 , month = jan, journal =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stad3299 , urldate =

    2024 doi

  46. [54]

    and Krolik, Julian H

    Schnittman, Jeremy D. and Krolik, Julian H. and Noble, Scott C. , year =. Disk. The Astrophysical Journal , volume =. doi:10.3847/0004-637X/819/1/48 , urldate =

    doi

  47. [55]

    and Narayan, Ramesh and Tchekhovskoy, Alexander and Gammie, Charles F

    Shafee, Rebecca and McKinney, Jonathan C. and Narayan, Ramesh and Tchekhovskoy, Alexander and Gammie, Charles F. and McClintock, Jeffrey E. , year =. Three-. The Astrophysical Journal , volume =. doi:10.1086/593148 , urldate =

    doi

  48. [56]

    Shakura, N. I. and Sunyaev, R. A. , year =. Black Holes in Binary Systems. Astronomy and Astrophysics , volume =

  49. [57]

    , year =

    Shapiro, Stuart L. , year =. Accretion onto. The Astrophysical Journal , volume =. doi:10.1086/151982 , urldate =

    doi

  50. [58]

    and Tomida, Kengo and White, Christopher J

    Stone, James M. and Tomida, Kengo and White, Christopher J. and Felker, Kyle G. , year =. The. The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series , volume =. doi:10.3847/1538-4365/ab929b , urldate =

    doi

  51. [59]

    and Mullen, Patrick D

    Stone, James M. and Mullen, Patrick D. and Fielding, Drummond and Grete, Philipp and Guo, Minghao and Kempski, Philipp and Most, Elias R. and White, Christopher J. and Wong, George N. , year =. The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series , volume =. doi:10.3847/1538-4365/ae371...

    doi

  52. [60]

    and Gardiner, Thomas A

    Stone, James M. and Gardiner, Thomas A. and Teuben, Peter and Hawley, John F. and Simon, Jacob B. , year =. Athena:. The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series , volume =. doi:10.1086/588755 , urldate =

    doi

  53. [61]

    , year =

    Tchekhovskoy, Alexander and Narayan, Ramesh and McKinney, Jonathan C. , year =. Efficient. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society: Letters , volume =. doi:10.1111/j.1745-3933.2011.01147.x , urldate =. arXiv , keywords =:1108.0412 , primaryclass =

    2011

  54. [62]

    Trott, Christian and. The. 2021 , month = sep, journal =. doi:10.1109/MCSE.2021.3098509 , urldate =

    2021

  55. [63]

    2020 , month = oct, journal =

    The Effects of Resolution on Black Hole Accretion Simulations of Jets , author =. 2020 , month = oct, journal =. doi:10.1093/mnras/staa2423 , urldate =

    2020 doi

  56. [64]

    and Stone, James M

    White, Christopher J. and Stone, James M. and Gammie, Charles F. , year =. An. The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series , volume =. doi:10.3847/0067-0049/225/2/22 , urldate =

    doi

  57. [65]

    and Mullen, Patrick D

    White, Christopher J. and Mullen, Patrick D. and Jiang, Yan-Fei and Davis, Shane W. and Stone, James M. and Morozova, Viktoriya and Zhang, Lizhong , year =. An. The Astrophysical Journal , volume =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/acc8cf , urldate =

    doi

  58. [66]

    and Stone, James M

    White, Christopher J. and Stone, James M. and Quataert, Eliot , year =. A. The Astrophysical Journal , volume =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab0c0c , urldate =

    doi

  59. [67]

    Zhang, S. N. and Cui, Wei and Chen, Wan , year =. Black. The Astrophysical Journal , volume =. doi:10.1086/310705 , urldate =

    doi

  60. [68]

    and Mullen, Patrick D

    Zhang, Lizhong and Stone, James M. and Mullen, Patrick D. and Davis, Shane W. and Jiang, Yan-Fei and White, Christopher J. , year =. Radiation. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2506.02289 , urldate =

    doi arXiv

  61. [69]

    2023 , urldate =

    Radiative Relativistic Magnetohydrodynamic Simulations of Neutron Star Column Accretion , author =. 2023 , urldate =

    2023

  62. [70]

    and Narayan, Ramesh and Kulkarni, Akshay K

    Zhu, Yucong and Davis, Shane W. and Narayan, Ramesh and Kulkarni, Akshay K. and Penna, Robert F. and McClintock, Jeffrey E. , year =. The Eye of the Storm: Light from the Inner Plunging Region of Black Hole Accretion Discs , shorttitle =. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomi...

  63. [71]

    and Press, William H

    Bardeen, James M. and Press, William H. and Teukolsky, Saul A. , year =. Rotating. The Astrophysical Journal , volume =. doi:10.1086/151796 , urldate =

    doi

  64. [72]

    and Narayan, Ramesh and Steiner, James F

    McClintock, Jeffrey E. and Narayan, Ramesh and Steiner, James F. , year =. Black. Space Science Reviews , volume =. doi:10.1007/s11214-013-0003-9 , urldate =

    doi

  65. [73]

    , year =

    Kerr, Roy P. , year =. Gravitational. Physical Review Letters , volume =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.11.237 , urldate =

    doi

  66. [74]

    Radiative

    Lan. Radiative. 2026 , month = mar, publisher =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2603.17922 , urldate =

    2026 doi arXiv

  67. [75]

    and Davis, Shane W

    Zhang, Lizhong and Stone, James M. and Davis, Shane W. and Jiang, Yan-Fei and Mullen, Patrick D. and White, Christopher J. , year =. Radiation. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2603.05588 , urldate =

    doi arXiv

  68. [76]

    and Brandenburg, Axel and Hor

    Abramowicz, Marek A. and Brandenburg, Axel and Hor. Universal Behaviour of \. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2603.10997 , urldate =

    doi arXiv

  69. [77]

    Penna, Robert F. and S. The. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , volume =. doi:10.1093/mnras/sts185 , urldate =

    doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.