Relative modular categories from $\mathfrak{osp}(2 \vert 2n)$

Matthew B. Young; Seth Porter

REVIEW 1 major objections 3 minor 13 references

Relative modular categories from $\mathfrak{osp}(2 \vert 2n)$

T0 review · 1 major / 3 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Weight modules over the unrolled quantum group of the superalgebra osp(2|2n) at an odd root of unity form a relative modular category, yielding new decorated three-dimensional topological quantum field theories.

desk verdict First relative modular categories for osp(2|2n), with a real but fixable scalar error in the stabilization coefficient. read the letter →

arxiv 2608.06333 v1 pith:25C2ZQDI submitted 2026-08-06 math.QA math.RT

Seth Porter , Matthew B. Young This is my paper · ORCID

classification math.QAmath.RT MSC 17B3757R56

keywords relativemodularcategoriesunrolledquantumgroupsLiesuperalgebrasosp(2|2n)modifiedtracestopologicalfieldtheoryKacmodulesrootofunity

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper constructs a new family of relative modular categories from the representation theory of the unrolled quantum group of the orthosymplectic Lie superalgebra $\mathfrak{osp}(2|2n)$ at a root of unity. A relative modular category is a non-semisimple generalization of a modular tensor category, and the construction from [DR22] turns one into a decorated three-dimensional topological quantum field theory. The paper proves that, for $q = e^{2\pi i/r}$ with $r$ odd and $r \nmid n$, the category of weight modules over $U^H_q(\mathfrak{osp}(2|2n))$ is generically semisimple, ribbon, and unimodular, with relative modularity parameter $\zeta = r^{n+1}$. If correct, this supplies the missing Type I family $\mathfrak{osp}(2|2n)$ beyond the previously treated $\mathfrak{sl}(m|n)$, yielding decorated TQFTs that can distinguish homotopy classes of lens spaces, a strength that invariants from modular tensor categories lack. The paper also provides explicit ribbon twists, modified quantum dimensions, and stabilization coefficients, making the resulting invariants computable.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing objects are the Kac modules $K(\lambda) = U^H_q(\mathfrak{osp}(2|2n)) \otimes_{U^H_q(\mathfrak{p})} S_0(\lambda)$, induced from simple modules of the bosonic subalgebra; these are simultaneously the generic simple objects and the projectives used to establish semisimplicity and to normalize the modified trace. The category is graded by $G = \mathfrak{h}^\vee/\Lambda_R$, with generic semisimplicity meaning that each non-critical grading class is semisimple and dominated by finitely many Kac modules up to tensoring with the free realization $Z = \Lambda_Z \times \mathbb{Z}/2\mathbb{Z}$ of one-dimensional modules. The pivotal element is $K_\pi$ with $\pi = 2r\rho_0 - 2\rho$, and the braiding is the truncated and specialized $h$-adic $R$-matrix of [Yam94], built from $q$-exponentials over positive roots. The relative modularity parameter $\zeta = r^{n+1}$ is extracted from the modified trace of a transparent morphism, and the stabilization coefficients are reduced to quadratic Gauss sums.

What would settle it

For a small case such as $n=1$ and $r=3$ or $5$, compute the Kac modules $K(\lambda)$ at weights $\lambda$ outside the critical set with the typicality product nonzero; if any $K(\lambda)$ is not simple, or if the projective cover of the trivial module is not self-dual, the relative modular structure fails. Alternatively, verify the relative modularity equation with $\zeta = r^{n+1}$ for a specific pair of generic classes and generic Kac modules.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is Theorem 3.29: for $q = e^{2\pi i/r}$ with $r$ odd and $r \nmid n$, the category $\mathcal{C}(r,n)$ of weight modules over the restricted unrolled quantum group $U^H_q(\mathfrak{osp}(2|2n))$ carries a relative modular structure. The proof shows that $\mathcal{C}(r,n)$ is generically semisimple with respect to the grading by $G = \mathfrak{h}^\vee/\Lambda_R$: away from a small symmetric set $X$ of critical classes, every simple object is a Kac module of dimension $r^{n^2}2^{2n}$ induced from a simple Verma module of the even subalgebra. A braiding is obtained by truncating the universal $R$-matrix of the $h$-adic quantum group [Yam94] and specializing to $q$, while the pivotal structure comes from the element $K_\pi$ with $\pi = 2r\rho_0 - 2\rho$. Unimodularity supplies a nondegenerate modified trace, and the relative modularity parameter is computed to be $\zeta = r^{n+1}$. Explicit formulas are given for the ribbon twists, modified quantum dimensions of generic Kac modules, and the stabilization coefficients $\Delta_\pm$.

Load-bearing premise

The proof's generic semisimplicity rests on the assumption that, for generic highest weights, the Verma modules of the even subalgebra are simple and the Kac modules are simple exactly when the product over odd roots of the $q$-numbers $\{\langle \lambda+\rho,\alpha\rangle\}_q$ does not vanish; if these typicality facts fail at the restricted root of unity, the dimension-$D$ simple modules would not exist and the main theorem would collapse.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

Via the TQFT construction from [DR22], the relative modular structure produces a decorated 3-dimensional TQFT $Z_{\mathcal{C}(r,n)}$ whose invariants can be evaluated using the explicit twists, modified dimensions and stabilization coefficients.
The resulting 3-manifold invariants are strictly stronger than invariants from modular tensor categories: they distinguish homotopy classes of lens spaces.
With the $\mathfrak{sl}(m|n)$ case already known, this completes all but the $\mathfrak{psl}(n|n)$ family among the Type I basic classical Lie superalgebras as sources of relative modular categories.
The explicit stabilization coefficients $\Delta_\pm$ and the value $\zeta = r^{n+1}$ make the invariants computable on plumbed 3-manifolds and circle bundles over closed surfaces.
The category gives the 3-manifold invariants needed to compare with the $\hat{Z}$-invariants for $\mathfrak{osp}(2|2n)$ discussed in [Cha21].

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

If the typicality criterion used here holds more broadly, the same strategy should produce relative modular categories for the other Type II superalgebras with semisimple classical representation theory, notably $\mathfrak{osp}(1|2n)$, where the paper notes that Kac modules are typically not simple.
The equality $\zeta = r^{n+1}$ matches the number of inequivalent highest-weight lifts in the finite-dimensional quotient $U^{[\lambda]}_q$, hinting that the relative modularity condition is essentially counting simple objects in a generic grading class.
The Gauss-sum evaluation of $\Delta_\pm$ implies a direct formula for the TQFT's action on mapping tori, which could be tested numerically against known invariants for small $r$ and $n$.
A natural next step is to attempt the analogous unrolled construction for $\mathfrak{psl}(n|n)$, using the paper's control of the critical set $X$ as a model for handling atypical weights.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

Hi — my take on arXiv:2608.06333: the main theorem is real and the paper is worth engaging with, but check Section 3.6 carefully. The displayed stabilization coefficient Δ+ is off by a factor of r. The derivation correctly writes Σ_{k∈I_osp(2|2n)} q^{-⟨k,k⟩} = r Σ_{k∈I_sp(2n-2)} q^{-⟨k,k⟩}, but the final answer substitutes the sp(2n-2) Gauss sum without the prefactor r. So the printed value ε(r,n-1) r^{(n-1)/2} should be ε(r,n-1) r^{(n+1)/2}. For n=1, r=3, direct evaluation gives 3, not 1 up to the q-exponential. This matters because Δ± enter the normalization of De Renzi's TQFT, but it is a localized scalar fix, not a structural flaw.

What is genuinely new: this is the first construction of relative modular categories for the osp(2|2n) family, completing the Type I list (sl(m|n) was done, psl(n|n) and osp(2|2n) were open). The paper gives explicit ribbon twists, modified dimensions, and the relative modularity parameter ζ=r^{n+1}, and the proof of existence follows the established unrolled-quantum-group strategy. The argument for ζ is independent of the stabilization coefficients and looks solid. I found no circularity or fitted parameters; the cited prior results do not already contain the osp(2|2n) theorem.

Soft spots, in proportion: the proofs of generic semisimplicity and the braiding truncation are compressed and lean on Zhang/Yamane/GKP22, so independent verification of every cited step was too much for one reading. That is typical for this area and not disqualifying. The garbled passage in Section 1.6 is a genuine readability defect that should be cleaned before publication, but it is not a scientific error. The typicality assumptions from [Zha93]/[GP13] are the main risk: if they fail at roots of unity, the dimension count in Theorem 3.13 would not go through. Nothing in the paper suggests they do, but the authors should be asked to spell out the root-of-unity dependence explicitly.

Who this is for: anyone working in non-semisimple quantum topology, relative modular categories, or decorated TQFTs. It deserves a serious referee; with the stabilization coefficient corrected and the text cleaned, it should be accepted. I'd send it out.

Referee Report

1 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper constructs relative modular categories from the restricted unrolled quantum group U^H_q(osp(2|2n)) at odd roots of unity q = e^{2πi/r} with r not dividing n. The main theorem (Theorem 3.29) states that the category C(r,n) of weight modules over U^H_q(osp(2|2n)) admits a relative modular structure with relative modularity parameter ζ = r^{n+1}. The proof proceeds by establishing generic semisimplicity with respect to a grading by h^∨/Λ_R, constructing a ribbon structure via a truncated Yamane R-matrix, proving unimodularity and the existence of a modified trace, and then verifying relative modularity. The paper also provides explicit ribbon twists, modified quantum dimensions of generic Kac modules, and explicit stabilization coefficients Δ_±, which feed into De Renzi's construction of decorated 3-dimensional TQFTs.

Significance. If correct, this is the first construction of relative modular categories for the orthosymplectic family osp(2|2n), completing the Type I basic classical superalgebra picture after the earlier treatment of sl(n|m). The construction is genuinely non-parametric in the sense that no free parameters are fitted: the relative modularity parameter ζ = r^{n+1} is derived from the representation theory, and the ribbon twists and modified dimensions are given by explicit formulas. The paper also connects the resulting TQFT to the program comparing non-semisimple invariants with BPS q-series, giving a concrete family of new examples for that comparison. The main weakness is not the existence argument but the explicit stabilization coefficients, which contain a numerical error; this does not appear to invalidate Theorem 3.29 itself, but it does affect the advertised explicit TQFT normalization.

major comments (1)

[Section 3.6, stabilization coefficients] The displayed computation of Δ_+ is missing a factor of r. The manuscript correctly derives Sum_{k∈I_osp} q^{-<k,k>} = r · Sum_{k∈I_sp(2n-2)} q^{-<k,k>}, using Sum_{l=0}^{r-1} q^{2lk_1} = r δ_{k_1,0} for odd r. Substituting the stated sp(2n-2) Gauss sum ε(r,n-1) r^{(n-1)/2} then yields ε(r,n-1) r^{(n+1)/2}, not the printed ε(r,n-1) r^{(n-1)/2}. The omission is not a harmless convention choice: for the smallest case n=1, r=3, a direct check of the sum over (a,b)∈(Z/3)^2 gives 3, while the printed formula gives a value of modulus 1 up to the common q-exponential factor. Because Δ_+ and Δ_- enter the normalization of De Renzi's decorated TQFT, the explicit stabilization coefficients advertised in the introduction and computed in Section 3.6 are incorrect as written. The existence claim Theorem 3.29 may survive after correcting this scalar, but the full claim of explicit stabilization coefficients requires the correction.

minor comments (3)

[Section 3.6] The symbol I is reused: in the proof of Theorem 3.29 it denotes a set of representatives of Λ_R/Λ_Z, while in Section 3.6 it is defined as Λ_R/rΛ_R. Please use different notation to avoid confusion.
[Theorem 3.29, proof] The equality |Λ_R/Λ_Z| = r^{n+1} is used implicitly when summing over the set I of representatives. This follows from Lemma 3.2 together with the fact that r is odd, but it would be helpful to state this one-line justification explicitly.
[Lemma 3.11] The statement that the set Y is "open and dense" in h^∨ uses a topology that is never specified. Please clarify that this is meant in the analytic topology, or reformulate in Zariski terms.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the relative modular structure is constructed from independent representation-theoretic inputs, and ζ is derived rather than assumed.

full rationale

The paper's central claim (Theorem 3.29) is a construction: it assembles a G-grading, a free realization, a bicharacter, a ribbon structure, a modified trace, and a relative modularity parameter ζ = r^{n+1} for the category of weight modules over U^H_q(osp(2|2n)). None of these inputs is fitted or defined in terms of the target conclusion. Generic semisimplicity (Theorem 3.13) is proved from Kac module typicality criteria cited to external sources (Zha93, GP13, DK90), and the braiding is truncated from Yamane's external universal R-matrix (Yam94), not from the authors' own prior work. The relative modularity parameter is computed inside the proof of Theorem 3.29 via modified traces and equation (9), which itself follows from Lemma 3.22 and Corollary 3.23; the proof does not insert ζ as an ansatz. The only notable concern in the paper is the explicit stabilization coefficient computation in Section 3.6, where the displayed value of Δ_+ appears to drop a factor of r when substituting the sp(2n−2) Gauss sum: the intermediate line r * Σ_{k∈I_sp(2n−2)} q^{-⟨k,k⟩} combined with the stated value ϵ(r,n−1)r^{(n−1)/2} gives ϵ(r,n−1)r^{(n+1)/2}, not the printed exponent (n−1)/2. This is an arithmetic/correctness issue in an explicit normalization constant, and it does not make the derivation circular: the existence statement of Theorem 3.29 and the structure of the argument do not reduce to the value of Δ_±. The manuscript self-cites the authors' related work only for context and motivation, not as load-bearing support for the osp(2|2n) construction.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no fitted parameters and no new entities; the theorem is derived from standard representation-theoretic results about the restricted unrolled quantum group of osp(2|2n). The axioms above are the external inputs on which the central claim rests.

assumptions (4)

domain assumption Yamane's universal R-matrix for Uh(osp(2|2n)) exists and satisfies the standard braid relations, and its truncation to the restricted quantum group is well-defined.
Invoked in Section 3.3 to construct the braiding on C; taken from [Yam94, Thm. 10.6.1] and adapted as in [AGPM21, Lem. 3.9].
domain assumption Typicality of Kac modules is governed by the product ∏_{α∈Δ+_1} {⟨λ+ρ,α⟩}_q, and generic Verma modules over U^H_q(osp(2|2n)_0) are simple.
Used in Propositions 3.8 and Theorem 3.13 and Corollary 3.24; imported from [Zha93, Prop. 2] and [GP13].
domain assumption The pivotal structure with pivot K_π makes C ribbon, and unimodularity implies existence of a non-degenerate modified trace via [GKP22, Cor. 6.5].
Used in Sections 3.3 and 3.4; these are external results that the paper combines rather than reproves.
standard math Standard facts from algebra and number theory: Wedderburn's theorem, density of finite-dimensional representations (Proposition 3.12), and Gauss sum evaluations for sp(2n-2) lattices.
Used in the proof of Theorem 3.13 and in Section 3.6 for stabilization coefficients.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Relative modular categories from $\mathfrak{osp}(2 \vert 2n)$." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/25C2ZQDI

@misc{pith2026260806333,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Relative modular categories from $\mathfrakosp(2 \vert 2n)$},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/25C2ZQDI}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2608.06333}
}

abstract

We construct relative modular categories from the weighted representation theory of the unrolled quantum group of the orthosymplectic Lie superalgebra $\mathfrak{osp}(2 \vert 2n)$.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2608.06333 by the authors.

**Figure 1.3.** Skein equivalences defining and +. for any g ∈ G \ X and V ∈ Cg. Definition 1.7. A modular G-category relative to (Z, X) is a pre-modular category C for which there exists a scalar ζ ∈ C ×, the relative modularity parameter, which satisfies (1) for all g, h ∈ G \ X and i, j ∈ Ig. 2. Quantum groups associated with osp(2|2n) 2.1. Conventions. Unless mentioned otherwise, the ground field is C. Write Z/2Z for the co… view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

13 extracted references · 13 canonical work pages

[1]

Anghel, N

[AGPM21] C. Anghel, N. Geer, and B. Patureau-Mirand,Relative (pre)-modular categories from special linear Lie superalgebras, J. Algebra586(2021), 479–525. [AP95] H. Andersen and J. Paradowski,Fusion categories arising from semisimple Lie algebras, Comm. Math. Phys.169(1995), no. 3, 563–588. [BCGPM16] C. Blanchet, F. Costantino, N. Geer, and B. Patureau-Mi...

work page 2021
[14]

Murakami,A proof of a conjecture of Gukov-Pei-Putrov-Vafa, Comm

[Mur24] Y. Murakami,A proof of a conjecture of Gukov-Pei-Putrov-Vafa, Comm. Math. Phys.405 (2024), no. 11, Paper No. 274,

work page 2024
[17]

Reshetikhin and V

[RT91] N. Reshetikhin and V. Turaev,Invariants of3-manifolds via link polynomials and quantum groups, Invent. Math.103(1991), no. 3, 547–597. [VHKT90] J. Van der Jeugt, J. Hughes, R. King, and J. Thierry-Mieg,A character formula for singly atypical modules of the Lie superalgebra sl(m/n), Comm. Algebra18(1990), no. 10, 3453–3480. [Wit89] E. Witten,Quantum...

work page 1991
[23]

Park,Higher rank ˆZ and FK, SIGMA Symmetry Integrability Geom

[Par20] S. Park,Higher rank ˆZ and FK, SIGMA Symmetry Integrability Geom. Methods Appl.16 (2020), Paper No. 044,

work page 2020
[48]

Deligne, P

[DEF+99] P. Deligne, P. Etingof, D. Freed, L. Jeffrey, D. Kazhdan, J. Morgan, D. Morrison, and E. Witten (eds.),Quantum fields and strings: a course for mathematicians. Vol. 1, 2, American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI; Institute for Advanced Study (IAS), Princeton, NJ, 1999, Material from the Special Year on Quantum Field Theory held at the Instit...

work page 2020
[51]

[GKP22] N. Geer, J. Kujawa, and B. Patureau-Mirand,M-traces in (non-unimodular) pivotal cate- gories, Algebr. Represent. Theory25(2022), no. 3, 759–776. [GP10] N. Geer and B. Patureau-Mirand,Multivariable link invariants arising from Lie superalgebras of type I, J. Knot Theory Ramifications19(2010), no. 1, 93–115. [GP13] ,Topological invariants from nonre...

work page 2022
[69]

Jantzen,Introduction to quantum groups, Representations of reductive groups, Publ

[Jan98] J. Jantzen,Introduction to quantum groups, Representations of reductive groups, Publ. Newton Inst., vol. 16, Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 1998, pp. 105–127. [Kac77] V. Kac,Lie superalgebras, Advances in Math.26(1977), no. 1, 8–96. [KT91] S. Khoroshkin and V. Tolstoy,Universal R-matrix for quantized (super)algebras, Comm. Math. Phys.141(1991),...

work page 1977
[71]

Towards a q-series for osp(2|2n)

[CGPM14] F. Costantino, N. Geer, and B. Patureau-Mirand,Quantum invariants of 3-manifolds via link surgery presentations and non-semi-simple categories, J. Topol.7(2014), no. 4, 1005–1053. [Cha21] J. Chae,Towards a ˆZ-series forosp(2|2n), arXiv:2106.09868,

work page Pith review arXiv 2014

Show all 13 references

[85]

Geer and M

[GY25] N. Geer and M. Young,Three dimensional topological quantum field theory from Uq(gl(1|1)) andU(1|1)Chern-Simons theory, Adv. Math.460(2025), Paper No. 110044,

2025
[1998]

Creutzig, T

RELATIVE MODULAR CATEGORIES FROMosp(2|2n) 21 [CDGG24] T. Creutzig, T. Dimofte, N. Garner, and N. Geer,A QFT for non-semisimple TQFT, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.28(2024), no. 1, 161–405. [CGP23] F. Costantino, S. Gukov, and P. Putrov,Non-semisimple TQFT’s and BPS q-series, SIGMA Sy...

2024
[2015]

Ferrari and P

[FP24] F. Ferrari and P. Putrov,Supergroups, q-series and 3-manifolds, Ann. Henri Poincar´ e25 (2024), no. 5, 2781–2837. [GGY25] N. Garner, N. Geer, and M. Young,B-twisted Gaiotto-Witten theory and topological quantum field theory, Comm. Math. Phys.406(2025), no. 2, Paper No. 29,

2024
[2021]

Costantino, M

[CHRY26] F. Costantino, M. Harper, A. Robertson, and M. Young,Non-semisimple topological field theory and bZ-invariants from osp(1|2), Lett. Math. Phys.116(2026), no. 1, Paper No. 8,

2026
[2022]

Dijkgraaf and E

[DW90] R. Dijkgraaf and E. Witten,Topological gauge theories and group cohomology, Comm. Math. Phys.129(1990), no. 2, 393–429. [EGH+11] P. Etingof, O. Golberg, S. Hensel, T. Liu, A. Schwendner, D. Vaintrob, and E. Yudovina, Introduction to representation theory, Student Mathem...

1990

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [1]

Anghel, N

[AGPM21] C. Anghel, N. Geer, and B. Patureau-Mirand,Relative (pre)-modular categories from special linear Lie superalgebras, J. Algebra586(2021), 479–525. [AP95] H. Andersen and J. Paradowski,Fusion categories arising from semisimple Lie algebras, Comm. Math. Phys.169(1995), no. 3, 563–588. [BCGPM16] C. Blanchet, F. Costantino, N. Geer, and B. Patureau-Mi...

work page 2021

[2] [14]

Murakami,A proof of a conjecture of Gukov-Pei-Putrov-Vafa, Comm

[Mur24] Y. Murakami,A proof of a conjecture of Gukov-Pei-Putrov-Vafa, Comm. Math. Phys.405 (2024), no. 11, Paper No. 274,

work page 2024

[3] [17]

Reshetikhin and V

[RT91] N. Reshetikhin and V. Turaev,Invariants of3-manifolds via link polynomials and quantum groups, Invent. Math.103(1991), no. 3, 547–597. [VHKT90] J. Van der Jeugt, J. Hughes, R. King, and J. Thierry-Mieg,A character formula for singly atypical modules of the Lie superalgebra sl(m/n), Comm. Algebra18(1990), no. 10, 3453–3480. [Wit89] E. Witten,Quantum...

work page 1991

[4] [23]

Park,Higher rank ˆZ and FK, SIGMA Symmetry Integrability Geom

[Par20] S. Park,Higher rank ˆZ and FK, SIGMA Symmetry Integrability Geom. Methods Appl.16 (2020), Paper No. 044,

work page 2020

[5] [48]

Deligne, P

[DEF+99] P. Deligne, P. Etingof, D. Freed, L. Jeffrey, D. Kazhdan, J. Morgan, D. Morrison, and E. Witten (eds.),Quantum fields and strings: a course for mathematicians. Vol. 1, 2, American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI; Institute for Advanced Study (IAS), Princeton, NJ, 1999, Material from the Special Year on Quantum Field Theory held at the Instit...

work page 2020

[6] [51]

[GKP22] N. Geer, J. Kujawa, and B. Patureau-Mirand,M-traces in (non-unimodular) pivotal cate- gories, Algebr. Represent. Theory25(2022), no. 3, 759–776. [GP10] N. Geer and B. Patureau-Mirand,Multivariable link invariants arising from Lie superalgebras of type I, J. Knot Theory Ramifications19(2010), no. 1, 93–115. [GP13] ,Topological invariants from nonre...

work page 2022

[7] [69]

Jantzen,Introduction to quantum groups, Representations of reductive groups, Publ

[Jan98] J. Jantzen,Introduction to quantum groups, Representations of reductive groups, Publ. Newton Inst., vol. 16, Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 1998, pp. 105–127. [Kac77] V. Kac,Lie superalgebras, Advances in Math.26(1977), no. 1, 8–96. [KT91] S. Khoroshkin and V. Tolstoy,Universal R-matrix for quantized (super)algebras, Comm. Math. Phys.141(1991),...

work page 1977

[8] [71]

Towards a q-series for osp(2|2n)

[CGPM14] F. Costantino, N. Geer, and B. Patureau-Mirand,Quantum invariants of 3-manifolds via link surgery presentations and non-semi-simple categories, J. Topol.7(2014), no. 4, 1005–1053. [Cha21] J. Chae,Towards a ˆZ-series forosp(2|2n), arXiv:2106.09868,

work page Pith review arXiv 2014