Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 6 minor 108 references

Average soft X-ray surface brightness profile of massive galaxy clusters in Magneticum simulations

T0 review · 4 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read The stacked soft X-ray profile of massive clusters measured by eROSITA is reproduced by Magneticum simulations from 0.3 to 3 R500 without any tuning.

desk verdict Careful, transparent mock-observation pipeline gives the first one-to-one Magneticum vs. eROSITA stacked profile comparison; the central agreement claim is plausible but needs a quantitative goodness-of-fit and sensitivity tests on the manual filtering and background subtraction. read the letter →

arxiv 2608.06619 v1 pith:3KK7FZE5 submitted 2026-08-06 astro-ph.CO astro-ph.HE

A. Kruglov , N. Lyskova , I. Khabibullin , V. Biffi , K. Dolag This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.COastro-ph.HE
keywords galaxyclustersX-raysurfacebrightnessprofilesstackinganalysisMagneticumsimulationseROSITAintraclustermediumAGNfeedbackcosmological
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Galaxy clusters grow nearly self-similarly, so stacking many clusters should reveal a clean average radial profile that simulations can predict. This paper builds mock eROSITA observations of 34 massive clusters from the Magneticum cosmological hydrodynamical simulations and stacks them exactly as real survey data are stacked. The simulated average soft X-ray (0.3–2.3 keV) surface brightness profile matches the observed eROSITA stacked profile out to about $3 R_{500}$, spanning more than two orders of magnitude in brightness, without any tuning. The main mismatch is in the core (inside $0.3 R_{500}$), where the simulation overpredicts emission, likely because its AGN feedback redistributes gas too aggressively. Beyond $R_{200m}$ the predicted signal falls orders of magnitude below the background fluctuations, so detecting the true far-outskirt emission would be very challenging even with larger samples.

What carries the argument

The central device is a mock-observation stacking pipeline: for each of 34 clusters in the Magneticum Box2/hr lightcone, PHOX generates X-ray photons from the gas assuming optically thin thermal emission, the photon counts are weighted by the eROSITA FoV-averaged effective area, convolved with a 26-arcsecond PSF, rescaled to a common $R_{500}=1\,\mathrm{Mpc}=10\,\mathrm{arcmin}$, and stacked with automatic masking of catalogued haloes plus manual filtering of bright substructures. The comparison profile is anchored by an Abel transform of the mean gas density profile of the same simulations, which also yields the clumpiness factor $C = \sqrt{\langle n_{\mathrm{gas}}^2\rangle / \langle n_{\mathrm{gas}}\rangle^2} \leq 1.7$.

What would settle it

Recompute the stacked profile using only the automatic catalogue-based masks, skipping the manual filtering, and check whether the $0.3$–$3 R_{500}$ profile changes by more than the quoted uncertainties; if it does, the reported out-of-the-box agreement depends on the subjective filtering rule rather than being purely intrinsic to the simulations.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper claims that the average gas distribution in the Magneticum simulations reproduces, out of the box, the stacked 0.3–2.3 keV surface brightness profile of massive galaxy clusters measured by SRG/eROSITA, from roughly $0.3 R_{500}$ out to $R_{200m}\approx 3 R_{500}$, spanning more than two orders of magnitude in surface brightness. The agreement is obtained after reprocessing the simulated clusters through the same observational pipeline (eROSITA response, PSF, rescaling, stacking) used for the real data. The only significant deviation is at small radii, $R < 0.3 R_{500}$, where the simulated core is too bright; the authors attribute this to the effective implementation of AGN feedback causing excessive gas redistribution. At larger radii the simulated stacked profile flattens into a radially uniform local background, and the mean cluster signal beyond $R_{200m}$ is orders of magnitude below the fluctuations of that background, implying that a robust detection of the cluster component in the far outskirts remains out of reach.

Load-bearing premise

The manual filtering of bright substructures is stopped as soon as the average profile stops changing, which assumes that any remaining bright patches are contaminants rather than genuine cluster emission; if this stopping rule removes real emission or leaves different contamination in different bins, the apparent agreement could be partly manufactured.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The average radial gas distribution in Magneticum is consistent with eROSITA observations from $0.3 R_{500}$ to $\sim 3 R_{500}$, so stacked X-ray profiles can serve as a population-level test of cosmological hydro simulations.
  • The core overprediction at $R < 0.3 R_{500}$ points to AGN feedback as the controlling baryonic process; future feedback models can be benchmarked against this stacked profile.
  • The simulated far outskirts (beyond $R_{200m}$) are dominated by a radially flat background, with the cluster signal falling orders of magnitude below background fluctuations; detecting that component will require much larger samples or better background modelling.
  • The clumpiness needed to reconcile the stacked profile with the directly-integrated gas density is mild ($C \leq 1.7$), indicating that gas clumping does not strongly bias the average X-ray profile on these scales.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A natural next test would be to apply the same stacking pipeline to higher-resolution or different feedback implementations (e.g., kinetic AGN feedback) and see whether the core excess shrinks while the outer agreement is preserved; this would isolate how feedback controls the inner profile.
  • The stopping rule for manual filtering ('until the average profile no longer changes') could be audited by injecting synthetic subhalo sources into the images and re-running the filter; if the recovered profile shifts, the out-of-the-box agreement is partly an artifact of the filtering choice.
  • The near-constant background plateau beyond $R_{200m}$ suggests that part of the 'excess' X-ray signal reported beyond the virial radius in some eROSITA stacks may be correlated large-scale structure (the two-halo term) rather than intracluster gas; modelling that term explicitly would sharpen the comparison.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 6 minor

Summary. This paper presents mock SRG/eROSITA observations of 34 massive clusters (M500 > 1.4 × 10^14 Msun/h) from the Magneticum Box2/hr lightcone, produced with the PHOX pipeline, and compares the stacked 0.3-2.3 keV surface brightness profile with the observed stacked profile of Lyskova et al. (2023) from eRASS. The authors find good agreement over roughly 0.3-3 R500, with a central excess in the simulation below about 0.3 R500 attributed to AGN feedback, and a background-dominated plateau beyond R200m. They also compare with an Abel-transform profile from gas densities and estimate a mild level of gas clumpiness. The central claim is that Magneticum reproduces the eROSITA cluster outskirts out of the box.

Significance. If substantiated, the result is valuable because it validates a large cosmological hydrodynamical simulation against a low-surface-brightness stacked observation at radii beyond R500, and it demonstrates a reproducible pipeline for mock eROSITA cluster observations. The manuscript's strengths include the use of a public simulation suite, a clearly described PHOX-based mock, explicit comparison to an external observational benchmark, and the public release of extracted images and a spectral database. However, the central "very good agreement" is currently supported only by visual inspection, and two analysis choices - manual filtering with a self-referential stopping rule and a local background defined as mean minus 1 sigma of the same stacked image - can in principle shape the comparison. These issues are fixable with robustness tests and quantitative metrics.

major comments (4)
  1. [§2.2] The manual filtering step is load-bearing and uses a self-referential criterion. The text states that "substructures are removed only until the average profile no longer shows any change", and Appendix B lists seven clusters (#1819, #7308, #11141, #14857, #4613, #17421, #17638) that are filtered by hand. Because the average profile is the quantity being compared to observations, stopping when it stops changing guarantees a smoother stacked profile and can remove real cluster emission along with contaminants, especially in the faint outskirts where the sample mean is set by a few clusters. The "out-of-the-box" claim therefore depends on the analyst's stopping rule. Please show the stacked profile before and after manual filtering, quantify the change in each radial bin, and repeat the comparison with an objective convergence rule (e.g., a fixed tolerance on profile change or a fixed mask area per cluster) to demonstrate that the agreement with L23 is not an artifact of this choice.
  2. [§3] The local background estimate is ad hoc and is derived from the same data product used to make the scientific claim. The authors adopt "mean minus 1σ" of the surface brightness values beyond R200m as a constant background and subtract it, which leaves a positive residual in the plateau by construction. Since the observed L23 profile also flattens in this region, this subtraction can manufacture apparent agreement in the outskirts rather than test it. Please justify the background level with an independent measurement (e.g., blank-sky eROSITA fields or the particle background model), or demonstrate robustness by showing the subtracted profile for alternative definitions (median, mean, mean ± 1σ, or a fitted constant over different outer annuli). This is particularly important because the magenta curve in Figures 3 and 4 is used to claim tracing beyond 3 R500.
  3. [Figures 3, 4, C.7] The comparison between simulated and observed profiles is purely visual. No chi-square, residual sum, or other goodness-of-fit statistic is given for the claimed 0.3-3 R500 range, and the error bars on the simulated points (azimuthal scatter among four wedges) are not propagated into a formal comparison. Please provide a quantitative agreement metric with uncertainties, e.g., reduced chi-square over the stated radial range using the L23 covariance and the azimuthal scatter, and comment on the scale and significance of the residuals shown in the center panel of Figure 4. Without this, "very good agreement" cannot be distinguished from a qualitative impression.
  4. [§4, Figure 4] The solid and dashed blue curves in Figure 4 are the L23 observed profile and the extrapolation of L23's best-fit model. Because that model was itself fitted to the same observed data, the extrapolated model is not an independent prediction; its use in the data/model panel can make the agreement look better than a direct comparison to the data points. Please clarify that the model is only an extrapolation aid, and quote the agreement statistic with respect to the L23 data points rather than the model.
minor comments (6)
  1. [§2.2] There is a typo in "correspoinding" in the sentence describing the line-of-sight thickness of each slice.
  2. [§2.2] The sentence "Finally, the images are smoothed to match the SRG/eROSITA at the redshift of the cluster, respectively." is incomplete; it should specify that the images are smoothed to the eROSITA PSF and how the redshift rescaling enters.
  3. [Appendix C] The Abel integral in Eq. (C.1) has garbled limits and should be rewritten to show integration over radius from R to Rmax with the 1/sqrt(r^2-R^2) kernel.
  4. [Appendix C] "it's square" should be "its square", and "inhomogenous" should be "inhomogeneous".
  5. [§2.1] The citation "Kruglov et al. (2025)" appears to refer to the same author team as this paper (Kruglova et al.); please reconcile the spelling.
  6. [Title and abstract] There are minor formatting issues: "inMagneticumsimulations" lacks a space, and "more than two orders in surface brightness" should read "more than two orders of magnitude".

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the Magneticum surface brightness profile is a genuine out-of-the-box prediction benchmarked against external eROSITA observations, with only minor self-citation and standard background/filtering choices.

full rationale

The central claim is an out-of-the-box comparison between a stacked 0.3-2.3 keV surface brightness profile generated from Magneticum simulation photon lists via PHOX and the externally measured SRG/eROSITA profile from Lyskova et al. (2023). No simulation parameter (gas density, temperature, or feedback) is adjusted to match the L23 observed profile, and the benchmark is observational data, not a quantity derived from the same simulation. The reduction steps are instrument calibration and standard analysis choices: use of the FoV-averaged ARF, a nominal 10^4 s exposure, and R500 rescaling are constant factors, not fitted parameters. The local background is estimated from the flat plateau of the simulated stacked profile itself and subtracted as a constant; this is a flat-background correction, not a fit to the observed profile. The manual filtering described in Section 2.2 uses a convergence criterion ('until the average profile no longer shows any change') and does not use L23 as a target, so the resulting profile is not forced to match observations by construction. Appendix C uses the L23-derived normalization N=0.014 cm^-3, but only as a response calibration for an independent consistency check via gas density profiles, not to scale the main mock-observation profile to the data. There is substantial self-citation, including Magneticum simulation papers and the shared-author L23 paper, but L23 is an external observational data set and the Magneticum references are simulation descriptions, not a chain that imports the target result. No equation in the paper reduces the prediction to the observation by construction, and no fitted parameter is renamed a prediction. The comparison is therefore self-contained against an external benchmark, with only minor non-load-bearing self-citation.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The analysis rests on standard simulation and observation assumptions: optically thin thermal emission, a simplified eROSITA response, self-similar rescaling, a data-derived background level, and the physical fidelity of Magneticum's subgrid models. No new physical entities are introduced.

free parameters (1)
  • Local background level = ~5e-6 counts/s/arcmin^2
    Estimated as the mean minus 1 sigma of the stacked surface brightness at R >= R200m, then subtracted from the same profile to reveal residual emission; this is an ad hoc constant chosen from the data.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption X-ray emission from simulated gas is optically thin thermal emission; AGN X-ray emission is excluded (Section 2.2).
    Mock photon lists are generated assuming this emission model, so any non-thermal or AGN contribution in real clusters is not captured.
  • domain assumption The eROSITA all-sky survey response is adequately represented by a FoV-averaged ARF and flat 10^4 s exposure per pointing (Section 2.2).
    Used to convert simulated photons to surface brightness; deviations between true and averaged ARF could bias the comparison.
  • domain assumption Self-similarity allows rescaled stacking with R500 = 1 Mpc and comparison across mass and redshift (Sections 1-2).
    The stacking and rescaling assume the average cluster is spherically symmetric and that profiles are universal after R500 scaling.
  • ad hoc to paper The background beyond R200m is a constant, radially flat level unrelated to cluster emission (Section 3).
    Used to define and subtract the local background; the paper itself notes the plateau is 'almost certainly not associated with the cluster emission'.
  • domain assumption Magneticum Box2/hr subgrid models (cooling, AGN feedback) are realistic enough for gas profiles outside the core.
    The central claim of agreement assumes the simulation's average gas distribution is physically accurate outside about 0.3 R500.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Average soft X-ray surface brightness profile of massive galaxy clusters in Magneticum simulations." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/3KK7FZE5

@misc{pith2026260806619,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Average soft X-ray surface brightness profile of massive galaxy clusters in Magneticum simulations},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/3KK7FZE5}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2608.06619}
}
read the original abstract

The self-similar growth of massive galaxy clusters suggests that radial profiles of their key thermodynamic properties should have identical shapes after proper mass- and redshift-dependent re-scaling. This property, tested within the virial radius on samples of well-studied individual objects, together with clear and robust observational characteristics such as sensitivity and background accounting, enables the possibility of stacking observations that can be confronted with identically-derived population-averaged predictions from theory or numerical simulations at large radii. Such a comparison not only eliminates effects of inevitable stochasticity in properties of individual objects, but also allows one to reach higher sensitivity for the faintest regions on the outskirts of the clusters. In this study, we conduct a one-to-one comparison of the observed and simulated average soft X-ray surface brightness profiles of several dozen massive galaxy clusters at low redshift. We find a very good out-of-the-box agreement between the 0.3 - 2.3 keV surface brightness profile of stacked galaxy clusters recently measured by SRG/eROSITA and the corresponding predictions from the Magneticum cosmological hydrodynamical simulations, which are known to reproduce other scaling relations observed for massive galaxy clusters. A significant difference between the observed and simulated profiles is present in the very central region, where effective implementation of the AGN feedback likely results in excessive gas redistribution within the core. The simulations predict a very noisy surface brightness profile beyond several times the virial radius of the cluster, with the mean signal being orders of magnitude lower than the local radially-flat but strongly fluctuating emission background, meaning that a proper detection of this component would be very challenging even with larger samples in the future.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2608.06619 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Histograms of the masses M500 and redshifts ztrue for two subsets of clusters in our sample (50 clusters with M500 below 1.4 × 1014M⊙/h in orange, and 34 clusters with M500 above this value in blue) and 38 clusters used for SRG/eROSITA stacking in Lyskova et al. (2023) in green. Dashed lines show median values for each subset. 2.2. X-ray images and filtering For each cluster, we collect all photons emitted by the ga… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Stacked exposure-corrected 0.3-2.3 keV image of 34 clusters with fil [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Comparison of the simulated and the observed radial profiles of X [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

108 extracted references · 26 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    , keywords =

    Perseus cluster in its X-ray entirety with SRG/eROSITA: Merger and radio-uroboroses. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202556614 , archivePrefix =. 2507.19987 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  2. [2]

    Tempestuous life beyond R _ 500 : X-ray view on the Coma cluster with SRG/eROSITA. II. Shock and relic. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202244021 , archivePrefix =. 2205.07511 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  3. [3]

    , keywords =

    The gas distribution in the outer regions of galaxy clusters. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201118281 , archivePrefix =. 1111.0020 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  4. [4]

    , keywords =

    Hydrodynamic Simulation of Non-thermal Pressure Profiles of Galaxy Clusters. , keywords =. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/792/1/25 , archivePrefix =. 1404.4636 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  5. [5]

    , keywords =

    Shocks and cold fronts in galaxy clusters. , keywords =. doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2007.01.001 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/0701821 , primaryClass =

    arXiv 2007

  6. [6]

    , keywords =

    The X-ray surface brightness profiles of hot galaxy clusters up to vec z -0.5ex 0.8: Evidence for self-similarity and constraints on Omega _ 0. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20020378 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/0110428 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  7. [7]

    , keywords =

    Gas Clumping in the Outskirts of CDM Clusters. , keywords =. doi:10.1088/2041-8205/731/1/L10 , archivePrefix =. 1103.0280 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  8. [8]

    , keywords =

    Mass Accretion and its Effects on the Self-similarity of Gas Profiles in the Outskirts of Galaxy Clusters. , keywords =. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/806/1/68 , archivePrefix =. 1411.5361 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

Show all 108 references
  1. [9]

    , keywords =

    Large-scale inhomogeneities of the intracluster medium: improving mass estimates using the observed azimuthal scatter. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stt654 , archivePrefix =. 1303.6506 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  2. [10]

    , keywords =

    Proprieties of clumps and filaments around galaxy clusters. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202140471 , archivePrefix =. 2102.01096 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  3. [11]

    , keywords =

    Linking a universal gas density profile to the core-excised X-ray luminosity in galaxy clusters up to z 1.1. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202243074 , archivePrefix =. 2206.06656 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  4. [12]

    , keywords =

    Universal thermodynamic properties of the intracluster medium over two decades in radius in the X-COP sample. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201833325 , archivePrefix =. 1805.00042 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  5. [13]

    , year = 1998, month = jan, volume =

    Simulations of Structure Formation in the Universe. , year = 1998, month = jan, volume =. doi:10.1146/annurev.astro.36.1.599 , adsurl =

    1998 doi

  6. [14]

    Computers in Physics , keywords =

    Cosmological N-body simulations. Computers in Physics , keywords =. doi:10.1063/1.4822978 , adsurl =

    doi

  7. [15]

    Possible origins of the soft X-ray excess emission

    X-ray emission in IllustrisTNG circum-cluster environments: II. Possible origins of the soft X-ray excess emission. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202556053 , archivePrefix =. 2506.18459 , primaryClass =

  8. [16]

    Cluster outskirts and filaments

    The eROSITA view of the Abell 3391/95 field. Cluster outskirts and filaments. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202347037 , archivePrefix =. 2311.07488 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  9. [17]

    , keywords =

    X-ray emission from warm-hot intergalactic medium: the role of resonantly scattered cosmic X-ray background. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/sty2992 , archivePrefix =. 1808.06259 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  10. [18]

    , keywords =

    Prospects of detecting soft X-ray emission from typical WHIM filaments around massive clusters and the coma cluster soft excess. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stad1514 , archivePrefix =. 2305.07579 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  11. [19]

    , keywords =

    The origin of ICM enrichment in the outskirts of present-day galaxy clusters from cosmological hydrodynamical simulations. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/sty363 , archivePrefix =. 1801.05425 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  12. [20]

    , keywords =

    A uniform metallicity in the outskirts of massive, nearby galaxy clusters. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stx1542 , archivePrefix =. 1706.01567 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  13. [21]

    , keywords =

    How the cool-core population transitions from galaxy groups to massive clusters: A comparison of the largest Magneticum simulation with eROSITA, XMM-Newton, Chandra and LOFAR observations. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202452203 , archivePrefix =. 2412.13182 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  14. [22]

    , keywords =

    Effects of Galaxy Formation on Thermodynamics of the Intracluster Medium. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/521328 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/0703661 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  15. [23]

    The first catalog of galaxy clusters and groups in the Western Galactic Hemisphere

    The SRG/eROSITA All-Sky Survey. The first catalog of galaxy clusters and groups in the Western Galactic Hemisphere. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202348264 , archivePrefix =. 2402.08452 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  16. [24]

    , keywords =

    Dependence of the Outer Density Profiles of Halos on Their Mass Accretion Rate. , keywords =. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/789/1/1 , archivePrefix =. 1401.1216 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  17. [25]

    The Cluster HEritage project with XMM-Newton: Mass Assembly and Thermodynamics at the Endpoint of structure formation. I. Programme overview. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202039632 , archivePrefix =. 2010.11972 , primaryClass =

    2010 arXiv

  18. [26]

    , keywords =

    The SRG/eROSITA All-Sky Survey: Detection of shock-heated gas beyond the halo boundary into the accretion region. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202557423 , archivePrefix =. 2509.25317 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  19. [27]

    , keywords =

    Inferring the dark matter splashback radius from cluster gas and observable profiles in the FLAMINGO simulations. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stae654 , archivePrefix =. 2312.05126 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  20. [28]

    , keywords =

    Outskirts of Galaxy Clusters. , keywords =. doi:10.1007/s11214-013-9983-8 , archivePrefix =. 1303.3286 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  21. [29]

    arXiv e-prints , keywords =

    Cosmology with Galaxy Clusters. arXiv e-prints , keywords =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2505.07697 , archivePrefix =. 2505.07697 , primaryClass =

    doi arXiv

  22. [30]

    arXiv e-prints , keywords =

    Encyclopedia Magneticum: Scaling Relations from Cosmic Dawn to Present Day. arXiv e-prints , keywords =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2504.01061 , archivePrefix =. 2504.01061 , primaryClass =

    doi

  23. [31]

    , keywords =

    The Splashback Radius as a Physical Halo Boundary and the Growth of Halo Mass. , keywords =. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/810/1/36 , archivePrefix =. 1504.05591 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  24. [32]

    , keywords =

    Can the splashback radius be an observable boundary of galaxy clusters?. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202450146 , archivePrefix =. 2403.18648 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  25. [33]

    , keywords =

    The splashback radius and the radial velocity profile of galaxy clusters in IllustrisTNG. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202348643 , archivePrefix =. 2311.10854 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  26. [34]

    , keywords =

    The splashback boundary of haloes in hydrodynamic simulations. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stab1221 , archivePrefix =. 2012.00025 , primaryClass =

    2012 arXiv

  27. [35]

    , keywords =

    The FLAMINGO project: galaxy clusters in comparison to X-ray observations. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stae1436 , archivePrefix =. 2312.08277 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  28. [36]

    , keywords =

    Shocks in the stacked Sunyaev-Zel'dovich profiles of clusters II: Measurements from SPT-SZ + Planck Compton-y map. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stac1376 , archivePrefix =. 2111.04778 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  29. [37]

    , keywords =

    Average energy of the X-ray spectrum as a model-independent proxy for the mass of galaxy clusters. , keywords =. doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2025/05/007 , archivePrefix =. 2408.12026 , primaryClass =

    2025 arXiv

  30. [38]

    , keywords =

    X-ray surface brightness and gas density profiles of galaxy clusters up to 3 R _ 500c with SRG/eROSITA. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stad2305 , archivePrefix =. 2305.07080 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  31. [39]

    MNRAS , keywords =

    AGN contamination of galaxy-cluster thermal X-ray emission: predictions for eRosita from cosmological simulations. MNRAS , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/sty2436 , archivePrefix =. 1804.01096 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  32. [40]

    A&A , keywords =

    SIXTE: a generic X-ray instrument simulation toolkit. A&A , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201935978 , archivePrefix =. 1908.00781 , primaryClass =

    1908 arXiv

  33. [41]

    A&A , keywords =

    The eROSITA view of the Abell 3391/95 field: Case study from the Magneticum cosmological simulation. A&A , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202141107 , archivePrefix =. 2106.14542 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  34. [42]

    Astronomy and Computing , keywords =

    A web portal for hydrodynamical, cosmological simulations. Astronomy and Computing , keywords =. doi:10.1016/j.ascom.2017.05.001 , archivePrefix =. 1612.06380 , primaryClass =

    2017 arXiv

  35. [43]

    MNRAS , keywords =

    (No) dimming of X-ray clusters beyond z 1 at fixed mass: crude redshifts and masses from raw X-ray and SZ data. MNRAS , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stv743 , archivePrefix =. 1502.03269 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  36. [44]

    Chandra Cluster Cosmology Project. II. Samples and X-Ray Data Reduction. ApJ , keywords =. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/692/2/1033 , archivePrefix =. 0805.2207 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  37. [45]

    arXiv e-prints , keywords =

    Distance measures in cosmology. arXiv e-prints , keywords =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.astro-ph/9905116 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/9905116 , primaryClass =

    doi arXiv

  38. [46]

    ApJL , keywords =

    Evolution of the Cluster X-Ray Scaling Relations since z > 0.4. ApJL , keywords =. doi:10.1086/344591 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/0207445 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  39. [47]

    Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics , keywords =

    Formation of Galaxy Clusters. Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics , keywords =. doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-081811-125502 , archivePrefix =. 1205.5556 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  40. [48]

    ApJ , keywords =

    X-Ray Properties of SPT-selected Galaxy Clusters at 0.2 < z < 1.5 Observed with XMM-Newton. ApJ , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aaf230 , archivePrefix =. 1807.02556 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  41. [49]

    ApJ , keywords =

    Toward a Halo Mass Function for Precision Cosmology: The Limits of Universality. ApJ , keywords =. doi:10.1086/591439 , archivePrefix =. 0803.2706 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  42. [50]

    Astronomy and Computing , keywords =

    HMFcalc: An online tool for calculating dark matter halo mass functions. Astronomy and Computing , keywords =. doi:10.1016/j.ascom.2013.11.001 , archivePrefix =. 1306.6721 , primaryClass =

    2013 arXiv

  43. [51]

    Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems V , year = 1996, editor =

    XSPEC: The First Ten Years. Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems V , year = 1996, editor =

    1996

  44. [52]

    ApJ , keywords =

    Predicting a Single-Temperature Fit to Multicomponent Thermal Plasma Spectra. ApJ , keywords =. doi:10.1086/500121 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/0504098 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  45. [53]

    ApJ , keywords =

    Absolute Measurement of the Unresolved Cosmic X-Ray Background in the 0.5-8 keV Band with Chandra. ApJ , keywords =. doi:10.1086/504070 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/0512542 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  46. [54]

    , keywords =

    On the Nature of Hydrostatic Equilibrium in Galaxy Clusters. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/0004-637X/827/2/112 , archivePrefix =. 1606.02293 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  47. [55]

    From Milky Way-like halos to massive clusters

    Average X-ray properties of galaxy groups. From Milky Way-like halos to massive clusters. arXiv e-prints , keywords =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2411.17120 , archivePrefix =. 2411.17120 , primaryClass =

    doi

  48. [56]

    , keywords =

    A multisimulation study of relativistic SZ temperature scalings in galaxy clusters and groups. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stac2781 , archivePrefix =. 2207.05834 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  49. [57]

    , keywords =

    Quantifying properties of ICM inhomogeneities. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/sts275 , archivePrefix =. 1210.6706 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  50. [58]

    Contributions from hot gas and X-ray binaries

    Decomposition of galactic X-ray emission with PHOX. Contributions from hot gas and X-ray binaries. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202244726 , archivePrefix =. 2208.04975 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  51. [59]

    , keywords =

    SZ effects in the Magneticum Pathfinder simulation: comparison with the Planck, SPT, and ACT results. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stw2035 , archivePrefix =. 1509.05134 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  52. [60]

    , keywords =

    Detecting galaxy groups populating the local Universe in the eROSITA era. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202450442 , archivePrefix =. 2404.12719 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  53. [61]

    MNRAS , keywords =

    Cosmological simulations of black hole growth: AGN luminosities and downsizing. MNRAS , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stu1023 , archivePrefix =. 1308.0333 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  54. [62]

    MNRAS , keywords =

    Observing simulated galaxy clusters with PHOX: a novel X-ray photon simulator. MNRAS , keywords =. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.20278.x , archivePrefix =. 1112.0314 , primaryClass =

    2011

  55. [63]

    MNRAS , keywords =

    Investigating the velocity structure and X-ray observable properties of simulated galaxy clusters with PHOX. MNRAS , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/sts120 , archivePrefix =. 1210.4158 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  56. [64]

    A&A , keywords =

    Effects of multiphase gas and projection on X-ray observables in simulated galaxy clusters as seen by eROSITA. A&A , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202245749 , archivePrefix =. 2212.11028 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  57. [65]

    ApJ , keywords =

    Chandra Spectra of the Soft X-Ray Diffuse Background. ApJ , keywords =. doi:10.1086/345347 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/0209441 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  58. [66]

    , keywords =

    Four Measures of the Intracluster Medium Temperature and Their Relation to a Cluster's Dynamical State. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/318249 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/0004309 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  59. [67]

    , keywords =

    Comparing the temperatures of galaxy clusters from hydrodynamical N-body simulations to Chandra and XMM-Newton observations. , keywords =. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2004.08167.x , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/0404425 , primaryClass =

    2004

  60. [68]

    , keywords =

    Seven-year Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) Observations: Cosmological Interpretation. , keywords =. doi:10.1088/0067-0049/192/2/18 , archivePrefix =. 1001.4538 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  61. [69]

    , keywords =

    The eROSITA X-ray telescope on SRG. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202039313 , archivePrefix =. 2010.03477 , primaryClass =

    2010 arXiv

  62. [70]

    The Open Journal of Astrophysics , keywords =

    Low-scatter galaxy cluster mass proxies for the eROSITA all-sky survey. The Open Journal of Astrophysics , keywords =. doi:10.21105/astro.2009.13944 , archivePrefix =. 2009.03944 , primaryClass =

    2009 arXiv

  63. [71]

    Systematic temperature differences and cosmological impact

    XMM-Newton and Chandra cross-calibration using HIFLUGCS galaxy clusters . Systematic temperature differences and cosmological impact. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201424085 , archivePrefix =. 1404.7130 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  64. [72]

    , keywords =

    A Chandra X-ray View of Stephan's Quintet: Shocks and Star Formation. , keywords =. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/701/2/1560 , archivePrefix =. 0812.0383 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  65. [73]

    arXiv e-prints , keywords =

    Simulating the LOcal Web (SLOW) -- II: Properties of local galaxy clusters. arXiv e-prints , keywords =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2402.01834 , archivePrefix =. 2402.01834 , primaryClass =

    doi arXiv

  66. [74]

    , keywords =

    Halo scaling relations and hydrostatic mass bias in the SIMBA simulation from realistic mock X-ray catalogues. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stad2666 , archivePrefix =. 2306.01397 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  67. [75]

    , keywords =

    A High Spectral Resolution Observation of the Soft X-Ray Diffuse Background with Thermal Detectors. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/341727 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/0205012 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  68. [76]

    , keywords =

    Cosmological Parameters from Observations of Galaxy Clusters. , keywords =. doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-081710-102514 , archivePrefix =. 1103.4829 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  69. [77]

    , keywords =

    A New Robust Low-Scatter X-Ray Mass Indicator for Clusters of Galaxies. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/506319 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/0603205 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  70. [78]

    , keywords =

    Mass Estimates of X-Ray Clusters. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/177798 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/9510058 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  71. [79]

    Comments on Astrophysics and Space Physics , keywords =

    The Observations of Relic Radiation as a Test of the Nature of X-Ray Radiation from the Clusters of Galaxies. Comments on Astrophysics and Space Physics , keywords =

  72. [80]

    Reviews of Modern Physics , year = 1986, month = jan, volume =

    X-ray emission from clusters of galaxies. Reviews of Modern Physics , year = 1986, month = jan, volume =. doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.58.1 , adsurl =

    1986 doi

  73. [81]

    , keywords =

    X-ray spectroscopy of galaxy clusters: studying astrophysical processes in the largest celestial laboratories. , keywords =. doi:10.1007/s00159-009-0023-3 , adsurl =

    doi

  74. [82]

    , keywords =

    Weighing simulated galaxy clusters using lensing and X-ray. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/200913222 , archivePrefix =. 0912.1343 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  75. [83]

    , keywords =

    How well can we determine cluster mass profiles from weak lensing?. , keywords =. doi:10.1046/j.1365-8711.2003.06264.x , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/0208351 , primaryClass =

    2003

  76. [84]

    , keywords =

    The L _ X -T Relation and Temperature Function for Nearby Clusters Revisited. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/306080 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/9802059 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  77. [85]

    Its telescopes and first scientific results

    SRG X-ray orbital observatory. Its telescopes and first scientific results. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202141179 , archivePrefix =. 2104.13267 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  78. [86]

    First X-ray catalogues and data release of the western Galactic hemisphere

    The SRG/eROSITA all-sky survey. First X-ray catalogues and data release of the western Galactic hemisphere. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202347165 , archivePrefix =. 2401.17274 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  79. [87]

    , keywords =

    Mapping `out-of-the-box' the properties of the baryons in massive halos. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202244068 , archivePrefix =. 2206.08382 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  80. [88]

    , keywords =

    The history of chemical enrichment in the intracluster medium from cosmological simulations. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stx444 , archivePrefix =. 1701.08164 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  81. [89]

    , keywords =

    Abundances of the elements: Meteoritic and solar. , keywords =. doi:10.1016/0016-7037(89)90286-X , adsurl =

    doi

  82. [90]

    The SRG/eROSITA view of the soft X-ray background in the eFEDS field

    Abundance and temperature of the outer hot circumgalactic medium. The SRG/eROSITA view of the soft X-ray background in the eFEDS field. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202243992 , archivePrefix =. 2210.03133 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  83. [91]

    Tempestuous life beyond R _ 500 : X-ray view on the Coma cluster with SRG/eROSITA. I. X-ray morphology, recent merger, and radio halo connection. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202040197 , archivePrefix =. 2012.11627 , primaryClass =

    2012 arXiv

  84. [92]

    , keywords =

    Updated Atomic Data and Calculations for X-Ray Spectroscopy. , keywords =. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/756/2/128 , archivePrefix =. 1207.0576 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  85. [93]

    , keywords =

    Galaxy cluster X-ray luminosity scaling relations from a representative local sample (REXCESS). , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/200810994 , archivePrefix =. 0809.3784 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  86. [94]

    , keywords =

    Chandra Sample of Nearby Relaxed Galaxy Clusters: Mass, Gas Fraction, and Mass-Temperature Relation. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/500288 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/0507092 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  87. [95]

    , keywords =

    The nature and energetics of AGN-driven perturbations in the hot gas in the Perseus Cluster. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stw520 , archivePrefix =. 1601.02615 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  88. [96]

    , keywords =

    The L\_X-T relation and intracluster gas fractions of X-ray clusters. , keywords =. doi:10.1046/j.1365-8711.1999.02442.x , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/9806353 , primaryClass =

    1999

  89. [97]

    , keywords =

    Cosmological Constraints from the Evolution of the Cluster Baryon Mass Function at z -0.5ex 0.5. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/374863 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/0212075 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  90. [98]

    , keywords =

    Evolution and clustering of rich clusters. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/222.2.323 , adsurl =

    doi

  91. [99]

    , keywords =

    The Aquarius Project: the subhaloes of galactic haloes. , keywords =. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.14066.x , archivePrefix =. 0809.0898 , primaryClass =

    2008

  92. [100]

    , keywords =

    The cosmological simulation code GADGET-2. , keywords =. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2005.09655.x , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/0505010 , primaryClass =

    2005

  93. [101]

    , keywords =

    Hydrostatic mass profiles of galaxy clusters in the eROSITA survey. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202244582 , archivePrefix =. 2211.12146 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  94. [102]

    , keywords =

    Offset between X-ray and optical centers in clusters of galaxies: Connecting eROSITA data with simulations. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202245138 , archivePrefix =. 2212.10107 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  95. [103]

    , keywords =

    An improved SPH scheme for cosmological simulations. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stv2443 , archivePrefix =. 1502.07358 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  96. [104]

    , keywords =

    The cosmological simulation code OPENGADGET3 - implementation of meshless finite mass. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stad2717 , archivePrefix =. 2301.03612 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  97. [105]

    Results at z=0

    Populating a cluster of galaxies - I. Results at z=0. , keywords =. doi:10.1046/j.1365-8711.2001.04912.x , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/0012055 , primaryClass =

    2001

  98. [106]

    , keywords =

    Substructures in hydrodynamical cluster simulations. , keywords =. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.15034.x , archivePrefix =. 0808.3401 , primaryClass =

    2009

  99. [107]

    SRG/eROSITA cross-calibration with Chandra and XMM-Newton using galaxy cluster gas temperatures

    The SRG/eROSITA All-Sky Survey. SRG/eROSITA cross-calibration with Chandra and XMM-Newton using galaxy cluster gas temperatures. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202349006 , archivePrefix =. 2401.17297 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  100. [108]

    , keywords =

    Interstellar photoelectric absorption cross sections, 0.03-10 keV. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/161102 , adsurl =

    doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.