Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 95 references

Parameter-free prediction of the asymptotic acceleration scale confirmed by weak lensing

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read This paper claims that the acceleration scale behind the baryonic Tully-Fisher relation is fixed by the background expansion and deceleration of the universe, and that a weak-lensing measurement matches its no-free-parameter prediction.

desk verdict The claimed confirmation rests on an equation that is internally inconsistent: Eq. (13) as printed gives a0 about 2.5 times larger than the value actually compared with weak lensing. read the letter →

arxiv 2608.07112 v1 pith:SZWWSRUN submitted 2026-08-07 astro-ph.GA

Maurice H.P.M. van Putten This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.GA
keywords baryonicTully-FisherrelationasymptoticaccelerationscaleweakgravitationallensingMilgrom'slawdeSitterdecelerationparametercosmologicaloriginofinertiaparameter-freeprediction
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper argues that the acceleration scale organizing galaxy rotation curves—the baryonic Tully-Fisher normalization—is not an independent empirical constant but a consequence of the cosmological background. The author's framework predicts the deep-asymptotic value $a_0^{\mathrm{th}} = (c^2/2\pi)\sqrt{J}$ with $J=(1-q)H^2/c^2$, i.e. a function of the Hubble parameter and the deceleration parameter alone, with no adjustable constants. A recent weak-lensing determination $a_0^{WL} = 1.63^{+0.23}_{-0.20}\times 10^{-8}\ \mathrm{cm\,s^{-2}}$ agrees with the updated prediction $a_0^{\mathrm{th}} = 1.63^{+0.13}_{-0.14}\times 10^{-8}\ \mathrm{cm\,s^{-2}}$ evaluated with late-time cosmological parameters. If this agreement is real, the largest-scale galaxy dynamics become a direct probe of background cosmology, without invoking modified gravity or dark-matter clustering on disk scales.

What carries the argument

The central mechanism is a horizon-regulated reduction of inertia. In a Rindler frame, rest mass is identified with the potential work integral up to the Rindler horizon at $\xi=c^2/a$; when that horizon would lie beyond the cosmological horizon $R_H$, the integration domain is truncated, producing $m'/m=a/a_{dS}$ and recovering Milgrom's law in the intermediate regime. In the deep-asymptotic regime the relevant cutoff becomes the background curvature length $\ell_J\sim J^{-1/2}$ with $J=(1-q)H^2/c^2$, which yields the curvature-regulated formula $a_0=(c^2/2\pi)\sqrt{J}$. This object carries the argument because it reduces $a_0$ to a function of only $(H_0,q_0)$, while the paper's Hamiltonian-invariance argument gives formal license to seek a nonlocal, cosmological origin of inertia.

What would settle it

A reader can settle the claim by computing the paper's printed Eq. (13), $a_0^{\mathrm{th}}=\sqrt{(1-q)/(2\pi)}\,cH$, with $H_0=73\ \mathrm{km\,s^{-1}\,Mpc^{-1}}$ and $q_0=-1.08$; this gives about $4.1\times 10^{-8}\ \mathrm{cm\,s^{-2}}$, not the quoted $1.63\times 10^{-8}$, so the displayed formula alone does not reproduce the claimed agreement. Re-evaluating the intended formula with the Planck value $q_0=-0.52$ instead lowers the prediction by a factor $\sqrt{8/5}\simeq 1.27$, placing it below the weak-lensing band.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that the asymptotic acceleration scale $a_0$ of the baryonic Tully-Fisher relation is set by the curvature of the background spacetime: $a_0^{\mathrm{th}}=(c^2/2\pi)\sqrt{J}$, where $J=(1-q)H^2/c^2$ is the trace of the Schouten tensor in a three-flat FLRW cosmology. With $H_0$ taken from the local distance ladder and $q_0\simeq -1.08\pm 0.29$ from late-time cosmology, the pre-existing, parameter-free prediction becomes $1.63^{+0.13}_{-0.14}\times 10^{-8}\ \mathrm{cm\,s^{-2}}$, matching the weak-lensing value $1.63^{+0.23}_{-0.20}\times 10^{-8}\ \mathrm{cm\,s^{-2}}$ within uncertainties. The same horizon-regulated mechanism predicts a sharp $C^0$ transition at the de Sitter acceleration $a_{dS}=cH$, which the paper identifies with a roughly $6\sigma$ gap between observed SPARC rotation curves and $\Lambda$CDM galaxy simulations. The paper takes the lensing agreement to close the logical chain from cosmology to galaxy dynamics to asymptotic scaling, with general relativity and baryonic matter alone governing gravity and lensing.

Load-bearing premise

The claim rests on the premise that the numerical factor in the central acceleration formula is fixed by background geometry rather than chosen to fit galaxy data, a step the paper cites to earlier work and does not re-derive here.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The baryonic Tully-Fisher normalization should evolve with redshift, with $da_0/dz<0$ at $z=0$ and a sign change near $z\simeq 0.5$, giving galaxy surveys a concrete prediction to test at intermediate redshifts.
  • If the agreement holds, no dark-matter clustering is needed within galactic disks; any dark component must remain dynamically subdominant in the optical regions while clustering on cosmological scales.
  • Planck-$\Lambda$CDM concordance parameters predict a normalization lower by $\sqrt{8/5}\simeq 1.27$, so high-precision Tully-Fisher measurements discriminate between early-time and late-time cosmological parameters.
  • The sharp $C^0$ transition at $a_{dS}=cH$ is a structural prediction: $\Lambda$CDM galaxy simulations show smooth transitions, while SPARC data show a gap at about $6\sigma$, and the paper argues no parameter rescaling removes that mismatch.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the claim is right, the Hubble-tension debate becomes directly relevant to galaxy dynamics: choosing local versus early-universe cosmological parameters shifts the predicted Tully-Fisher normalization by tens of percent, so precise bTFR measurements at several redshifts could act as an independent arbiter.
  • The paper's printed Eq. (13) does not numerically yield its own value; the intended formula appears to be $a_0=cH\sqrt{1-q}/(2\pi)$. Checking whether that coefficient is derived from the curvature scalar or matched to the observed normalization is the fastest way to test whether the 'parameter-free' label survives.
  • Because the theory leaves gravity and lensing unmodified, its cleanest distinguishing signature is the redshift dependence of $a_0$; modified-gravity models with an absolute acceleration constant predict no such dependence, making high-redshift bTFR measurements a discriminating experiment.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The manuscript claims that the weak-lensing baryonic Tully-Fisher normalization a0_WL = 1.63^{+0.23}_{-0.20} × 10^-8 cm/s^2 (Mistele et al. 2024; Monjo 2025) confirms a parameter-free theoretical prediction a0_th = 1.63^{+0.13}_{-0.14} × 10^-8 cm/s^2 derived from background cosmology. The model is based on an indeterminacy of inertial mass in the gravitational sector: below the de Sitter scale a_dS = cH, the Rindler horizon lies beyond the cosmological horizon, and a horizon-truncated work integral gives reduced inertial mass and Milgrom-like scaling. In the deep-asymptotic regime the paper identifies the curvature scalar J = (1-q)H^2/c^2 as the relevant scale and states the prediction as Eq. (13). Evaluating this with LDL parameters H0 = 73 km/s/Mpc and q0 = -1.08 gives Eq. (14), which agrees with Eq. (2); the paper concludes that this agreement closes the logical chain between cosmology, galaxy dynamics, and the asymptotic acceleration scale.

Significance. If Eq. (13) were genuinely derived from first principles with no adjustable coefficient, the agreement with an independent weak-lensing measurement would be a significant, quantitative connection between galaxy dynamics and global cosmology, and the predicted redshift dependence (negative da0/dz at z=0) is a falsifiable target for future surveys. The paper's explicit uncertainty propagation and its use of a publicly available independent measurement are strengths. However, the load-bearing formula Eq. (13) is not derived in this manuscript and is internally inconsistent as printed, so the claimed confirmation is not currently established.

major comments (3)
  1. [§3.2, Eq. (13)] The printed equation is inconsistent with the text and with the paper's own numerical result. The text defines a0_th = (c^2/2π)√J with J = (1-q)H^2/c^2, which yields a0_th = (√(1-q)/(2π)) a_dS. The printed Eq. (13), a0_th = √((1-q)/(2π)) a_dS, is larger by a factor √(2π) ≈ 2.5. Using the printed form with H0 = 73 km/s/Mpc and q0 = -1.08 gives a0 ≈ 4.1 × 10^-8 cm/s^2, far outside the weak-lensing value in Eq. (2); the value 1.63 × 10^-8 cm/s^2 in Eq. (14) is obtained only from the text expression. Since the agreement with observation is the entire evidence for the confirmation claim, Eq. (13) must be corrected and the intended form stated unambiguously.
  2. [§3.2, Eq. (13)] The derivation of the central relation is not presented here; the manuscript cites van Putten (2017c, 2024c). Because the paper's central claim is that a0_th is parameter-free, the coefficient 1/(2π) must be shown to follow from the stated curvature-regulated work integral in Eqs. (10)–(11), rather than from matching the bTFR normalization. Please include the derivation or a precise quotation with equation numbers from the cited papers, and explicitly confirm that no galaxy data enter the coefficient.
  3. [§1 and §4] The claimed independence of the test is qualified by a shared value of H0. The text states in §1 that the weak-lensing estimate in Eq. (2) adopts H0 = 73 km/s/Mpc, and the theoretical prediction in Eq. (14) is evaluated with the same H0 via the LDL value. If the lensing-derived a0_WL scales with H0 through the distance scale, then the ratio a0_WL/a0_th may be nearly H0-independent, so the agreement chiefly tests the coefficient in Eq. (13) and the value of q0. The manuscript should state the H0-dependence of a0_WL explicitly and explain what exactly is being tested by the comparison.
minor comments (4)
  1. [§3.2] The sentence beginning 'governed by the curvature scalar J=...' after 'conformally invariant wave propagation.' is a grammatical fragment; please rewrite the paragraph.
  2. [§5] There is a typo in the final section: 'galatic disks' should be 'galactic disks'.
  3. [Abstract and §4] The abstract quotes the earlier prediction as a0_th ≃ 1.66 × 10^-8 cm/s^2, while Eq. (14) gives 1.63^{+0.13}_{-0.14} × 10^-8 cm/s^2; please clarify which of these is the updated value and how the update was made.
  4. [Introduction] The citation 'Di Valentino et al. 2025' appears without author initials in the text and in the reference list; please complete the entry.

Circularity Check

2 steps flagged · score 6.0 of 10

The central 'parameter-free prediction' is imported via self-citation, and Eq. (13) as printed does not produce the numerical value compared with weak lensing.

  1. other [Section 3.2, Eq. (13) and the sentence preceding it]
    "Curvature-sensitivity of inertial mass on this background is described by a0_th = (c^2/2π)√J (van Putten 2017c, 2024c), i.e.: a0_th = sqrt((1-q)/(2π)) a_dS. (13)"

    Substituting J=(1-q)H^2/c^2 into the formula stated in the prose gives a0_th = sqrt(1-q)/(2π) a_dS, which is smaller than the printed Eq. (13) by a factor sqrt(2π) ≈ 2.5. Using H0 ≈ 73 km/s/Mpc and q0 ≈ -1.08, the prose form yields the 1.63e-8 cm/s^2 quoted in Eq. (14), while the printed Eq. (13) would yield about 4.1e-8 cm/s^2, in strong disagreement with the weak-lensing value. The agreement claimed in §4 therefore does not follow from the equation displayed as the prediction; it follows from a different, unstated form of the same relation. The coefficient that makes the comparison succeed is not fixed by the printed derivation, so the central 'parameter-free prediction' is not actually obtained from the stated mathematics.

  2. self citation load bearing [Section 3.2, Eq. (13); also abstract and Section 4]
    "Curvature-sensitivity of inertial mass on this background is described by a0_th = (c^2/2π)√J (van Putten 2017c, 2024c), i.e.: a0_th = sqrt((1-q)/(2π)) a_dS. ... This fixes its parameterization in a0 by (H0, q0) of the cosmological background."

    The numerical coefficient and the functional form of the central prediction are not derived in this paper; they are taken from the author's own earlier publications. The entire bridge from background cosmology to the tested acceleration scale is therefore a self-citation, not a derivation reproduced here. If the earlier papers calibrated this coefficient to the baryonic Tully-Fisher normalization, then the weak-lensing agreement reported here would reduce to that calibration rather than to an independent prediction. The present manuscript gives no derivation or external check that would rule out that possibility, so the load-bearing step is an imported self-citation rather than a self-contained first-principles result.

full rationale

The weak-lensing measurement itself is external and the abstract states that the prediction predates the lensing determination, which counts against simple retrofitting. However, the central numerical prediction is not re-derived in the present paper: Eq. (13) is attributed to the author's prior work, and the relation shown as Eq. (13) is internally inconsistent with the formula in the prose immediately above it. As printed, Eq. (13) would predict a0 ≈ 4.1e-8 cm/s^2, contradicting the weak-lensing value; the 1.63e-8 cm/s^2 compared with observation follows from the alternative text form using coefficient 1/(2π). Thus the claimed confirmation is not a consequence of the stated equation, and the coefficient that produces agreement is supplied by an unshown, self-cited derivation. This makes the central claim partially circular: the prediction is equivalent, within this manuscript, to an imported formula whose coefficient is not independently established. The external lensing data still provide some independent content, but the printed derivation chain does not support the parameter-free claim as presented.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 1 invented entities

The central claim rests on an unproven modification of inertia. The numerical coefficient in the a0 formula is not derived in this paper and may have been calibrated to fit the bTFR. The printed equation (13) is internally inconsistent with the paper's own result. The only independent falsifiable handle is the predicted redshift evolution of a0.

free parameters (1)
  • Coefficient in Eq (13) = 1/(2π) ≈ 0.159 (or 1/√(2π) if Eq (13) is read literally)
    The coefficient multiplying sqrt((1-q)) cH is not derived in this paper; the printed Eq (13) is inconsistent with the numerical result, indicating either a typo or a hidden choice of normalization. If it was selected to reproduce the observed bTFR normalization, it is a free parameter.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption Inertial mass is regulated by a causal truncation of the work integral at the cosmological horizon (Eq 10-11).
    This is the mechanism that reduces inertia for accelerations below a_dS; it is a speculative modification of Newtonian dynamics.
  • ad hoc to paper In the deep-asymptotic regime, the Rindler horizon is replaced by the curvature scale ℓ_J ~ J^{-1/2} of the Schouten tensor trace.
    Stated in Section 3.2 without derivation; this replacement is the key step leading to Eq (13).
  • ad hoc to paper The relevant curvature scalar is J = (1-q)H^2/c^2 and a0 = (c^2/2π)√J.
    Cited to van Putten (2017c, 2024c); not derived in this paper.
  • domain assumption Late-time cosmology is described by dynamical dark energy with q0 ≈ -1 rather than Planck-ΛCDM with q0 ≈ -0.52.
    The prediction is sensitive to q0; the choice of q0 ≈ -1 is supported by the author's prior work and external LDL data, but is not the concordance ΛCDM value.
invented entities (1)
  • Cosmologically regulated reduced inertial mass independent evidence
    purpose: Explains the baryonic Tully-Fisher relation and the asymptotic acceleration scale a0 without dark matter or modified gravity.
    The model predicts a redshift evolution of a0 (d a0/dz < 0) that is testable with future surveys, giving it a falsifiable handle. However, no direct evidence for modified inertia is presented.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Parameter-free prediction of the asymptotic acceleration scale confirmed by weak lensing." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/SZWWSRUN

@misc{pith2026260807112,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Parameter-free prediction of the asymptotic acceleration scale confirmed by weak lensing},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/SZWWSRUN}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2608.07112}
}
abstract

The de Sitter transition scale $a_{dS}=cH$ to anomalous galaxy dynamics was previously derived from first principles based on the background Hubble expansion $H$ and the velocity of light $c$. It introduces a $C^0$-transition across $a_{dS}$, which is in tension with predictions of $\Lambda$CDM galaxy models at a significance of $6\sigma$. Tracing late-time cosmology, it predicted the deep-asymptotic acceleration scale $a_0^{th}\simeq 1.66\times 10^{-8}{\rm cm\,s^{-2}}$ without adjustable parameters based on $H$ and the deceleration parameter $q$. A recent weak-lensing determination of $a_0^{WL} = 1.63_{-0.20}^{+0.23}\times 10^{-8}{\rm cm\,s}^{-2}$ now provides an independent empirical test of this prediction. The agreement with the updated theoretical value $a_0^{th} = 1.63_{-0.14}^{+0.13}\times 10^{-8}{\rm cm\,s^{-2}}$ closes the logical chain between cosmology, galaxy dynamics, and asymptotic scaling. Unlike phenomenological fits to rotation curves, this result does not rely on tuning or baryonic modeling but follows directly from background cosmology. This parameter-free model suggests some further tests by galaxy surveys extending over a finite range of redshifts.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2608.07112 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Observed and theoretical values of the acceleration scale 𝑎0 in bTFR. Observational bands correspond to rotation-curve measurements of gas-rich galaxies (McGaugh 2012) and to recent weak-lensing determina￾tions (Mistele et al. 2024; Monjo 2025). Theoretical predictions are shown for curvature-regulated inertia in late-time cosmology with LDL parameters and for the Planck-ΛCDM concordance model. Band widths indicate … view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

95 extracted references · 51 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society , year = 1917, month = jan, volume =

    Nebulae. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society , year = 1917, month = jan, volume =

    1917

  2. [2]

    Proceedings of the National Academy of Science , year = 1929, month = mar, volume =

    A Relation between Distance and Radial Velocity among Extra-Galactic Nebulae. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science , year = 1929, month = mar, volume =. doi:10.1073/pnas.15.3.168 , adsurl =

    doi:10.1073/pnas.15.3.168 1929

  3. [3]

    Annales de la Soci

    Un Univers homog \`e ne de masse constante et de rayon croissant rendant compte de la vitesse radiale des n \'e buleuses extra-galactiques. Annales de la Soci

  4. [4]

    , title =

    de Sitter, W. , title =. Proc. Roy. Neth. Acad. Arts Sci. , volume =

  5. [5]

    Carroll, S. M. , title =. Living Reviews in Relativity , year =

  6. [6]

    , title =

    Friedmann, A. , title =. Zeitschrift für Physik , year =

  7. [7]

    , title =

    Einstein, A. , title =. Sitzungsberichte der Königlich Preußischen Akademie der Wissenschaften , year =

  8. [8]

    and Treu, T

    Verde, L. and Treu, T. and Riess, A. G. , title =. Nature Astronomy , year =

Show all 95 references
  1. [9]

    , keywords =

    A New Estimator of the Deceleration Parameter from Galaxy Rotation Curves. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/0004-637X/824/1/43 , archivePrefix =. 1604.01099 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  2. [10]

    Di Valentino, E. et al. , title =. Classical and Quantum Gravity , year =

  3. [11]

    Zhao, G.-B. et al. , title =. Nature Astronomy , year =

  4. [12]

    Di Valentino, E. et al. , title =. Phys. Rev. D , year =

  5. [13]

    Riess, A. G. et al. , title =. AJ , year =

  6. [14]

    Riess, A. G. and Yuan, W. and Macri, L. M. and Scolnic, D. and Brout, D. and Casertano, S. and Jones, D. O. and Murakami, Y. and Breuval, L. and Brink, T. G. and et al. , title =. ApJ , year =

  7. [15]

    Perlmutter, S. et al. , title =. ApJ , year =

  8. [16]

    Gravitational Waves in General Relativity. VI. The Outgoing Radiation Condition. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series A , year = 1961, month = nov, volume =. doi:10.1098/rspa.1961.0202 , adsurl =

    1961

  9. [17]

    , year = 1983, month = jul, volume =

    A modification of the newtonian dynamics : implications for galaxy systems. , year = 1983, month = jul, volume =. doi:10.1086/161132 , adsurl =

    1983 doi

  10. [18]

    , keywords =

    A modification of the Newtonian dynamics - Implications for galaxies. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/161131 , adsurl =

    doi

  11. [19]

    , keywords =

    A modification of the Newtonian dynamics as a possible alternative to the hidden mass hypothesis. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/161130 , adsurl =

    doi

  12. [20]

    , keywords =

    Comparison of HMG and Flat Rotation Velocities Inferred from Galaxy Galaxy Weak Lensing. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/adb8d7 , archivePrefix =. 2410.04258 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  13. [21]

    Physical Review Research , keywords =

    Local determination of the Hubble constant and the deceleration parameter. Physical Review Research , keywords =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevResearch.2.013028 , archivePrefix =. 1906.11814 , primaryClass =

    1906 arXiv

  14. [22]

    , keywords =

    An improved model-independent assessment of the late-time cosmic expansion. , keywords =. doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2018/10/015 , archivePrefix =. 1805.03595 , primaryClass =

    2018 arXiv

  15. [23]

    , keywords =

    The weak lensing radial acceleration relation: Constraining modified gravity and cold dark matter theories with KiDS-1000. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202040108 , archivePrefix =. 2106.11677 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  16. [24]

    , keywords =

    Nine-year Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) Observations: Cosmological Parameter Results. , keywords =. doi:10.1088/0067-0049/208/2/19 , archivePrefix =. 1212.5226 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  17. [25]

    , keywords =

    Using the Baryonic Tully-Fisher Relation to Measure H _ o. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-3881/ab9d88 , archivePrefix =. 2006.08615 , primaryClass =

    2006 arXiv

  18. [26]

    , keywords =

    Indefinitely Flat Circular Velocities and the Baryonic Tully Fisher Relation from Weak Lensing. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ad54b0 , archivePrefix =. 2406.09685 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  19. [27]

    , keywords =

    SPARC: Mass Models for 175 Disk Galaxies with Spitzer Photometry and Accurate Rotation Curves. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/0004-6256/152/6/157 , archivePrefix =. 1606.09251 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  20. [28]

    , keywords =

    Radial Acceleration Relation in Rotationally Supported Galaxies. , keywords =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.117.201101 , archivePrefix =. 1609.05917 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  21. [29]

    Living Reviews in Relativity , keywords =

    Modified Newtonian Dynamics (MOND): Observational Phenomenology and Relativistic Extensions. Living Reviews in Relativity , keywords =. doi:10.12942/lrr-2012-10 , archivePrefix =. 1112.3960 , primaryClass =

    2012 arXiv

  22. [30]

    , keywords =

    The Baryonic Tully-Fisher Relation of Gas-rich Galaxies as a Test of CDM and MOND. , keywords =. doi:10.1088/0004-6256/143/2/40 , archivePrefix =. 1107.2934 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  23. [31]

    Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201833910 , archivePrefix =. 1807.06209 , primaryClass =

    2018 arXiv

  24. [32]

    , title =

    Mach, E. , title =. 1893 , publisher =

  25. [33]

    , title =

    Weinberg, S. , title =

  26. [34]

    , title =

    Mukhanov, V. , title =

  27. [35]

    , title =

    Dodelson, S. , title =

  28. [36]

    , title =

    Weinberg, S. , title =. Rev. Mod. Phys. , year =

  29. [37]

    and Peebles, P

    Ratra, B. and Peebles, P. J. E. , title =. Phys. Rev. D , year =

  30. [38]

    Peebles, P. J. E. , title =

  31. [39]

    Peebles, P. J. E. and Ratra, B. , title =. Rev. Mod. Phys. , year =

  32. [40]

    Carroll, S. M. , title =

  33. [41]

    Fixsen, D. J. , title =. ApJ , year =

  34. [42]

    and Sugiyama, N

    Hu, W. and Sugiyama, N. , title =. ApJ , year =

  35. [43]

    , title =

    Hu, W. , title =. Phys. Rev. D , year =

  36. [44]

    , title =

    Vikman, A. , title =. Phys. Rev. D , year =

  37. [45]

    Eisenstein, D. J. and Hu, W. , title =. ApJ , year =

  38. [46]

    Eisenstein, D. J. et al. , title =. ApJ , year =

  39. [47]

    Anderson, L. et al. , title =. MNRAS , year =

  40. [48]

    Bardeen, J. M. and Carter, B. and Hawking, S. W. , title =. Communications in Mathematical Physics , year =

  41. [49]

    Gibbons, G. W. and Hawking, S. W. , title =. Phys. Rev. D , year =

  42. [50]

    Nuclear Physics B , year = 1978, month = jun, volume =

    Path integrals and the indefiniteness of the gravitational action. Nuclear Physics B , year = 1978, month = jun, volume =. doi:10.1016/0550-3213(78)90161-X , adsurl =

    1978 doi

  43. [51]

    , keywords =

    Lorentzian quantum cosmology. , keywords =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.95.103508 , archivePrefix =. 1703.02076 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  44. [52]

    Physics of the Dark Universe , keywords =

    The CosmoVerse White Paper: Addressing observational tensions in cosmology with systematics and fundamental physics. Physics of the Dark Universe , keywords =. doi:10.1016/j.dark.2025.101965 , archivePrefix =. 2504.01669 , primaryClass =

    2025

  45. [53]

    DeWitt, B. S. , title =. Phys. Rev. , year =

  46. [54]

    , title =

    Planck, M. , title =. Annalen der Physik , year =

  47. [55]

    Bekenstein, J. D. , title =. Phys. Rev. D , year =

  48. [56]

    , year = 1981, month = jan, volume =

    Universal upper bound on the entropy-to-energy ratio for bounded systems. , year = 1981, month = jan, volume =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.23.287 , adsurl =

    1981 doi

  49. [57]

    Hawking, S. W. , title =. Commun. Math. Phys. , year =

  50. [58]

    , title =

    ’t Hooft, G. , title =. arXiv:gr-qc/9310026 , year =

    arXiv

  51. [59]

    , title =

    Susskind, L. , title =. J. Math. Phys. , year =

  52. [60]

    , title =

    Heisenberg, W. , title =. Z. Phys. , year =

  53. [61]

    Zeldovich, Y. B. , title =. JETP Lett. , year =

  54. [62]

    , keywords =

    Alleviating tension in CDM and the local distance ladder from first principles with no free parameters. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnrasl/slz158 , adsurl =

    doi

  55. [63]

    Chinese Journal of Physics , keywords =

    Galaxy dynamics tracing quantum cosmology beyond <mml:math altimg=``si13.svg'' display=``inline'' id=``d1e23''><mml:mi> </mml:mi></mml:math>CDM below the de Sitter scale of acceleration. Chinese Journal of Physics , keywords =. doi:10.1016/j.cjph.2024.07.040 , archivePrefix =....

    arXiv

  56. [64]

    Classical and Quantum Gravity , keywords =

    A quantum of information in black hole evaporation. Classical and Quantum Gravity , keywords =. doi:10.1088/1361-6382/ad2319 , archivePrefix =. 2310.19839 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  57. [65]

    Corfu Summer Institute 2023 ``School and Workshops on Elementary Particle Physics and Gravity'' , year = 2024, month = jul, eid =

    The Hubble parameter of the Local Distance Ladder from dynamical dark energy with no free parameters. Corfu Summer Institute 2023 ``School and Workshops on Elementary Particle Physics and Gravity'' , year = 2024, month = jul, eid =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2408.13121 , archivePrefi...

    2023 doi arXiv

  58. [66]

    Corfu Summer Institute 2025 ``School and Workshops on Elementary Particle Physics and Gravity'' , year = 2026, month = jul, eid =

    A natural expansion of the cosmological vacuum in cosmographic quantities: phantom crossing at cosmic noon. Corfu Summer Institute 2025 ``School and Workshops on Elementary Particle Physics and Gravity'' , year = 2026, month = jul, eid =

    2025

  59. [67]

    Journal of High Energy Astrophysics , keywords =

    On the Hubble expansion in a Big Bang quantum cosmology. Journal of High Energy Astrophysics , keywords =. doi:10.1016/j.jheap.2024.12.002 , archivePrefix =. 2403.10865 , primaryClass =

    2024 arXiv

  60. [68]

    arXiv e-prints , keywords =

    APPLIED COSMOGRAPHY: A Pedagogical Review. arXiv e-prints , keywords =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.1812.02394 , archivePrefix =. 1812.02394 , primaryClass =

    doi arXiv

  61. [69]

    Journal of High Energy Astrophysics , keywords =

    A doublet of cosmological models to challenge the <mml:math altimg=``si8.svg''><mml:msub><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mn>0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math> tension in the Pantheon Supernovae Ia catalog. Journal of High Energy Astrophysics , keywords =. doi:10.1016/j.jheap.2024.12.003 ...

    doi

  62. [70]

    and Dickinson, M

    Madau, P. and Dickinson, M. , title =. Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics , year =

  63. [71]

    Finkelstein, S. L. , title =. Publications of the Astronomical Society of Australia , year =

  64. [72]

    arXiv e-prints , keywords =

    Evidence for increasing dark energy in the Late Universe. arXiv e-prints , keywords =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2509.23168 , archivePrefix =. 2509.23168 , primaryClass =

    doi arXiv

  65. [73]

    , keywords =

    What is the no-boundary wave function of the Universe?. , keywords =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.99.043526 , archivePrefix =. 1812.01760 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  66. [74]

    Mach's Principle: From Newton's Bucket to Quantum Gravity , year = 1995, editor =

    Mach's Principle: From Newton's Bucket to Quantum Gravity. Mach's Principle: From Newton's Bucket to Quantum Gravity , year = 1995, editor =

    1995

  67. [75]

    , keywords =

    A new method of determining distances to galaxies. , keywords =

  68. [76]

    , keywords =

    Thermodynamics of Spacetime: The Einstein Equation of State. , keywords =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.75.1260 , archivePrefix =. gr-qc/9504004 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  69. [77]

    Reports on Progress in Physics , keywords =

    Thermodynamical aspects of gravity: new insights. Reports on Progress in Physics , keywords =. doi:10.1088/0034-4885/73/4/046901 , archivePrefix =. 0911.5004 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  70. [78]

    Physics Letters B , keywords =

    Entropic accelerating universe. Physics Letters B , keywords =. doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2010.12.025 , archivePrefix =. 1002.4278 , primaryClass =

    2010 arXiv

  71. [79]

    , keywords =

    Nonlinear wave equations for relativity. , keywords =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.53.3056 , archivePrefix =. gr-qc/9505023 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  72. [80]

    , keywords =

    Accelerated expansion from cosmological holography. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnrasl/slv038 , archivePrefix =. 1504.05178 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  73. [81]

    , keywords =

    Self-similar galaxy dynamics below the de Sitter scale of acceleration. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnrasl/sly149 , archivePrefix =. 1804.06212 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  74. [82]

    Physics of the Dark Universe , keywords =

    The Fast and Furious in JWST high- z galaxies. Physics of the Dark Universe , keywords =. doi:10.1016/j.dark.2023.101417 , archivePrefix =. 2312.16692 , primaryClass =

    2023

  75. [83]

    Fast evolution of the Hubble parameter H(z)

    Accelerated cosmological expansion without tension in the Hubble parameter. Fast evolution of the Hubble parameter H(z). European Physical Journal Web of Conferences , year = 2018, series =. doi:10.1051/epjconf/201816808005 , adsurl =

    2018

  76. [84]

    , keywords =

    Prospects for high-resolution probes of galaxy dynamics tracing background cosmology in MaNGA. , keywords =. doi:10.1016/j.newast.2025.102360 , archivePrefix =. 2501.11882 , primaryClass =

    2025

  77. [85]

    , keywords =

    Entropic force in black hole binaries and its Newtonian limits. , keywords =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.85.064046 , archivePrefix =. 1107.1764 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  78. [86]

    Astrophysical Journal , volume =

    Lewis, Antony and Challinor, Anthony and Lasenby, Anthony , title =. Astrophysical Journal , volume =

  79. [87]

    Aghaei Abchouyeh, Maryam and van Putten, Maurice H. P. M. , title =. Physical Review D , volume =. 2021 , doi =

    2021

  80. [88]

    2019 , doi =

    de Sitter Swampland, H_0 Tension and Observation , journal =. 2019 , doi =

    2019

  81. [89]

    Modern Physics Letters A , keywords =

    Galaxy rotation curves and the deceleration parameter in weak gravity. Modern Physics Letters A , keywords =. doi:10.1142/S0217732317300191 , archivePrefix =. 1707.01619 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  82. [90]

    Physical Review , year = 1960, month = sep, volume =

    Hyperbolic Motion in Curved Space Time. Physical Review , year = 1960, month = sep, volume =. doi:10.1103/PhysRev.119.2082 , adsurl =

    1960 doi

  83. [91]

    , keywords =

    CDM is Consistent with SPARC Radial Acceleration Relation. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/835/1/L17 , archivePrefix =. 1610.06183 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  84. [92]

    , keywords =

    Anomalous Galactic Dynamics by Collusion of Rindler and Cosmological Horizons. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aa5da9 , adsurl =

    doi

  85. [93]

    2017 , doi =

    Evidence for Galaxy Dynamics Tracing Background Cosmology Below the de Sitter Scale of Acceleration , journal =. 2017 , doi =

    2017

  86. [94]

    Physics Letters B , keywords =

    Evidence of the fine-structure constant in H _ 0 -tension. Physics Letters B , keywords =. doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2021.136737 , adsurl =

    2021

  87. [95]

    Frenk and Simon D

    Volker Springel and Carlos S. Frenk and Simon D. M. White , title =. Nature , volume =. 2006 , doi =

    2006

Pith tools

Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.