Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 17 references

A Review of Galaxy Quenching -- Part II: Theoretical Solutions and Direct Observational Tests

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Massive central galaxies stay quenched because low-Eddington AGN feedback continuously heats their gas halos; low-mass satellites quench because their environment strips or starves them.

desk verdict A thorough, useful review of galaxy quenching that faithfully summarizes the field's consensus on AGN feedback; no new science, but a valuable reference for students and researchers. read the letter →

arxiv 2608.07247 v1 pith:7KXBGHXC submitted 2026-08-07 astro-ph.GA

Asa F. L. Bluck This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.GA
keywords galaxyquenchingAGNfeedbackradio-modekineticcoolingflowsrampressurestrippingstrangulationsatellitegalaxies
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This review argues that the observed split between star-forming and quiescent galaxies is best explained by two complementary quenching channels. Massive central galaxies quench through their own supermassive black holes, specifically through low-Eddington-ratio radio/kinetic-mode AGN feedback that heats the surrounding hot gas halo and stabilizes cooling; ejective quasar-mode feedback and supernovae can trigger or accelerate quenching but cannot maintain it. Low-mass satellite galaxies quench environmentally, because ram-pressure and tidal stripping remove their gas and strangulation cuts off its replacement. The review also establishes quenching as a maintenance problem: stellar evolution continuously returns gas to even the most passive galaxies, so a viable mechanism must prevent rejuvenation over cosmological timescales, not merely remove gas once. If this synthesis is right, the theory of galaxy formation has a concrete testable picture: black-hole jets keep massive galaxies quiet, and the cluster/group environment keeps low-mass satellites quiet.

What carries the argument

The machinery that carries the argument is the low-Eddington-ratio AGN feedback channel, also called radio-mode or kinetic-mode feedback, defined as mechanical energy injection from jets or accretion-disk winds when $\dot{M}_{\rm BH}\ll \dot{M}_{\rm Edd}$. Its work is to deposit energy into the circumgalactic medium at a rate $\dot{E}_{\rm feedback}=\epsilon_f\epsilon_r\dot{M}_{\rm BH}c^2$, with the time-integrated energy proportional to the black hole mass, and to balance the halo's radiative cooling so that the cooling time stays longer than the dynamical time. The supporting identity for environment is ram-pressure stripping, $P_{\rm ram}\simeq\rho_{\rm ICM}v_{\rm sat}^2$, which removes the ISM or CGM of satellites, together with tidal stripping and strangulation that remove or cut off the gas supply. The paper treats these as a maintenance cycle: stellar mass loss continuously returns gas ($\dot{M}_*\sim 1.5\times10^{-11}(t/13\,{\rm Gyr})^{-1.3}M_*$), so the same heating or stripping must act continuously, not just once.

What would settle it

If a large sample of massive quenched central galaxies at $z\sim0$ were found with X-ray measured circumgalactic cooling times far shorter than the dynamical time and with no radio jet, kinetic wind, or other low-Eddington AGN activity, the radio-mode maintenance claim would be falsified. A direct simulation test would be to rerun a matched cosmological volume with the low-Eddington kinetic/radio channel disabled; the central claim predicts that the high-mass quenched fraction and the stellar-mass-function cutoff would collapse.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central discovery claim is that galaxy quenching in nature splits into an intrinsic channel and an environmental channel, and that within the intrinsic channel the absolutely critical ingredient is feedback from active galactic nuclei in the low-accretion 'radio' or 'kinetic' mode. According to the synthesis, this mode injects mechanical energy from jets or disk winds into the circumgalactic medium, raising its entropy, offsetting radiative cooling, and thereby preventing the hot halo from condensing back onto the galaxy. The cumulative energy available is set by the supermassive black hole mass, $E_{\rm feedback}\propto M_{\rm BH}$, which is why black hole mass is a better correlate of central quenching than many other galaxy properties. Ejective quasar-mode feedback, supernova feedback, and morphological stabilization can explain individual quenching attempts and some rapid transitions, but the review argues that none of them can explain the long-term quiescence of massive centrals; only maintenance-mode radio/kinetic AGN feedback can. For satellites, the same long-term requirement is met environmentally through stripping and strangulation, and the paper argues that the observed inside-out/outside-in quenching patterns, stellar metallicities, and jellyfish galaxies all point to this two-channel picture.

Load-bearing premise

The argument rests on the premise that the adjustable feedback parameters in galaxy simulations, tweaked until simulated galaxies match observed stellar masses and quenched fractions, represent the real physics that operates in nature rather than just compensating for missing processes.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Massive quiescent centrals should show ongoing low-Eddington AGN activity, such as radio jets or kinetic winds, whose time-integrated energy is comparable to the binding energy of their circumgalactic medium.
  • Without such maintenance, quenched massive galaxies should re-ignite star formation within about a gigayear, because stellar mass loss alone rebuilds roughly $10^9\,M_\odot$ of cold gas per Gyr.
  • Satellite quenching should proceed from the outside in, with ram-pressure and tidal stripping removing the CGM first and the ISM later, matching the observed outside-in quenching pattern.
  • Quasar-mode feedback and mergers may trigger or accelerate quenching but cannot be the main demographic cause; the model predicts that quenched fractions at fixed mass require the continuous low-Eddington channel, not the bursty one.
  • In cosmological simulations, removing the low-Eddington AGN feedback channel should destroy the agreement with the observed stellar mass function at $M_*\gtrsim10^{10.5}\,M_\odot$ and with cluster cooling-flow observations.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If radio/kinetic AGN feedback is the universal maintenance mechanism, then the same physical process should appear in two settings currently studied separately: individual massive galaxies as jet-inflated X-ray cavities, and clusters as central AGN feedback regulating cooling flows; a testable extension is to compare cumulative cavity power with black hole mass across both settings.
  • The review's two-channel picture suggests that quenched fractions can be decomposed into a mass term that should track cumulative AGN energy or black hole mass and an environment term that should track stripping and starvation timescales; feature-importance analyses on large galaxy surveys could test which predictor wins at fixed stellar mass.
  • The deepest uncertainty is whether demographic success is overdetermined: if several different sub-grid feedback recipes can all reproduce observed stellar mass functions, then matching demographics does not uniquely confirm the AGN feedback mechanism, and direct per-galaxy measurements of jet energy balance are needed to break that degeneracy.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. This is the second part of a two-part review of galaxy quenching. It synthesizes theoretical quenching mechanisms—virial-shock/halo-mass quenching, quasar-mode and radio/kinetic-mode AGN feedback, supernova feedback, dynamical stabilization, and environmental processes (ram-pressure stripping, tidal stripping, strangulation, pre-processing)—and confronts them with direct observational tests. The paper's central synthesis is that AGN feedback, especially the low-Eddington-ratio radio/kinetic mode, is essential for stabilizing cooling flows in massive haloes and for quenching central galaxies, while low-mass satellites quench primarily through environmental stripping and strangulation. The review is explicitly framed as a review rather than a new derivation, and it repeatedly distinguishes star-formation regulation from quenching proper.

Significance. If correct, the synthesis provides a useful map of a large and fragmented literature, with particularly clear definitions of terminology, a careful separation of initial triggering from long-term maintenance, and a balanced treatment of intrinsic versus environmental routes. The review's strengths include its extensive referencing, its reproduction of standard equations in a pedagogical form, and its willingness to state tentative answers in Section 8. It does not, however, introduce new data, new simulations, or new analytical results, so its value is as a critical synthesis rather than as an original contribution. A reader should come away with a clear picture of where the field stands, but also with an honest statement of which steps in the argument are established consensus and which rest on calibration-dependent simulation modeling.

major comments (3)
  1. [§2.6, §8.2.1] The central conclusion that low-Eddington-ratio kinetic/radio-mode AGN feedback is the essential intrinsic quenching mechanism in nature rests on a uniqueness premise that the review does not establish. The evidence chain is that simulations reproduce the z=0 stellar mass function and quenched fractions only when AGN feedback is included (Fig. 3, §2.6), but Eqs. (17) and (31) show that the feedback efficiencies epsilon_f and epsilon_k are free parameters calibrated to reproduce those same observables. The review itself notes in §2.4.2 that Bondi accretion 'does not account for a host of important physics.' A recalibration or a variant model without kinetic-mode AGN but with other maintenance channels or different sub-grid coupling is not presented. I ask the authors to either soften the wording from 'in nature' to 'in current simulations and models' or include an explicit discussion of parameter degeneracy and of tests that do not rely on calibrated parameters.
  2. [§4.5–§4.6] The observational tests using supermassive black hole mass rely on M_BH values inferred from the M_BH–sigma relation (Sect. 1.3, Fig. 2). Since central velocity dispersion or bulge mass is itself among the strongest observed correlates of quenching, a test using sigma-inferred M_BH cannot cleanly separate the hypothesis 'AGN feedback energy proportional to M_BH drives quenching' from the alternative that the same structural property that predicts quenching is being re-entered under a new label. The review warns in §1.3 that population correlations do not directly establish causation, but this caveat is not carried into the interpretation of the M_BH-based tests. Please make this limitation explicit and either restrict such tests to systems with direct black-hole mass measurements or present the machine-learning results as demonstrating correlation strength rather than causal necessity.
  3. [§2.6, §8.1] The EAGLE result is used to motivate the necessity of a radio/kinetic mode: EAGLE, without any radio mode, nearly matches the stellar mass function while over-rejuvenating high-mass galaxies. The jump from 'EAGLE over-rejuvenates high-mass galaxies' to 'kinetic-mode AGN is required' is not a controlled comparison, because EAGLE and IllustrisTNG differ in many other sub-grid choices (feedback stochasticity, coupling method, numerical scheme, resolution). The over-rejuvenation could in principle be corrected by other missing physics, such as stronger thermal coupling, cosmic-ray pressure, or the SN Ia maintenance effects discussed in §2.3.1. The review should acknowledge this explicitly when drawing the integrated conclusion, or compare simulations in which only the AGN mode is toggled while all other physics is held fixed.
minor comments (5)
  1. [§3.1.1 heading] The heading contains a typo: 'Hierarchical assembley' should be 'Hierarchical assembly'.
  2. [§3.4] The word 'metalicities' should be 'metallicities'.
  3. [Fig. 1 caption] The caption states that the schematic was generated by ChatGPT-5. For reproducibility and transparency, please clarify whether the figure is an illustrative artistic rendering and consider whether a standard, author-made schematic would be more suitable for a review article.
  4. [Eq. (46) and Fig. 14] The text says that escape velocities rise with redshift, but Fig. 14 shows only z=0 values; the claim about redshift dependence is not directly supported by the displayed figure and should be stated either as a general property of the NFW profile or accompanied by a multi-redshift version.
  5. [Table 3] The notes to Table 3 define the grouping into quasar-mode and radio-mode, but the table would be easier to read if the 'Thermal', 'Kinetic', 'Bubble', and 'X-ray' columns were explicitly defined in a legend rather than only in the prose around the table.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No construction-level circularity: this is a review that synthesizes externally published simulation and observational results, and its central claim does not reduce by definition to a fitted parameter or a self-citation.

full rationale

The paper is a literature review, not a derivation. Its central synthesis — that radio/kinetic-mode AGN feedback stabilizes cooling flows and quenches high-mass centrals, while environmental processes quench satellites — is assembled from many independent, mostly external, published results. The main potential concern is that simulations calibrate sub-grid AGN efficiencies to match observed galaxy demographics, and the review then treats those simulations as evidence that AGN feedback is physically necessary. The paper itself is transparent about this calibration: in Section 2.4.2 it states that 'Most modern simulations take ϵr = 0.1, and systematically vary ϵf to achieve agreement with observational constraints.' Similarly, Section 2.6 describes IllustrisTNG's kinetic efficiency (ϵk = 0.2) and thresholds chosen to reproduce stellar mass functions. This is a real epistemic limitation — the calibrated efficiencies could in principle absorb missing physics — but it is not a circularity in the formal sense. The review does not rename a fitted parameter as a prediction; it reports that simulations with AGN feedback reproduce observations better than simulations without it, which is a genuine comparative result, even if not a first-principles proof. The review also explicitly cautions in Section 1.3 that 'population level galaxy statistics do not directly constrain the causes or mechanisms of galaxy quenching,' showing that it does not claim a purely correlational proof. Self-citations to Bluck et al. (2014, 2016, 2020a,b, 2022) occur in support of empirical correlations (e.g., central density, bulge mass, velocity dispersion, satellite quenching), but these are published, independent-grounded results and are not the sole load-bearing support for the main synthesis. The paper's use of MBH as a proxy for integrated AGN feedback energy (Eq. 18, E_feedback ∝ MBH) is a physically motivated modeling assumption, not a definition that makes the observational test tautological; the review supports the AGN-feedback paradigm with many independent lines of evidence, including direct observations of jets, cavities, outflows, and simulation comparisons. Overall, no step in the paper reduces by construction to its own inputs, and no load-bearing argument depends on an unverified self-citation chain.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

Since this is a review, the ledger lists parameters and assumptions inherited from the models and observations it synthesizes, rather than new contributions from this paper. The key inherited assumption is that sub-grid feedback parameters calibrated to match galaxy demographics are physically meaningful, and that the simulation successes therefore identify the real quenching mechanisms.

free parameters (4)
  • epsilon_f (AGN feedback efficiency) = varied, often around 0.05 to 0.1
    Equation (17) and Section 2.4.2 define the fraction of AGN luminosity coupled to gas. The text states this is systematically varied to achieve agreement with observational constraints.
  • k_AGN (hot-mode accretion coupling constant) = tuned in Henriques et al. 2015
    Equation (23) in Section 2.4.4 sets the radio-mode accretion rate from black hole mass and hot gas mass. The text calls k_AGN a tuneable coupling constant.
  • epsilon_k (kinetic-mode feedback efficiency) = 0.2 in IllustrisTNG
    Equation (31) in Section 2.6 defines the fraction of accreted rest energy injected as kinetic energy. The value is a fixed model parameter calibrated to reproduce observed quenching.
  • E_star (star formation efficiency per free-fall time) = approximately 0.01
    Equation (8) in Section 2.1 parameterizes the volumetric Kennicutt-Schmidt law. The text notes this sub-grid parameter is tuned to match observational scaling relations.
assumptions (4)
  • standard math FLRW background cosmology and linear perturbation theory provide the framework for structure formation.
    Invoked in Section 1.4.1 as the foundation for all contemporary cosmological simulations and models.
  • domain assumption Dark matter haloes form hierarchically and host galaxies, groups, and clusters.
    Adopted throughout Sections 1.4.2 and 3.1.1 as the backbone for both intrinsic and environmental quenching routes.
  • domain assumption Sub-grid prescriptions for star formation, black hole accretion, and feedback represent the unresolved physics they are designed to model.
    Central to Section 2.6, where the review concludes that AGN feedback is critical based on simulations whose sub-grid parameters are calibrated to reproduce observations.
  • domain assumption Observational proxies such as stellar mass, SMBH mass, and halo mass inferred from abundance matching are reliable enough to test quenching theories.
    Used in Section 1.3 to construct the quenched-fraction comparisons that motivate the two-channel quenching picture.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of A Review of Galaxy Quenching -- Part II: Theoretical Solutions and Direct Observational Tests." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/7KXBGHXC

@misc{pith2026260807247,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: A Review of Galaxy Quenching -- Part II: Theoretical Solutions and Direct Observational Tests},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/7KXBGHXC}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2608.07247}
}
read the original abstract

The goal of this review article series is to provide a comprehensive overview of galactic star formation and quenching from both an observational and theoretical perspective. Drawing on a vast quantity of literature, we attempt to answer a deceptively simple question: why do galaxies cease forming stars? In Part II, we concentrate primarily on results from theory and simulations, in addition to direct observational tests of theoretically proposed quenching routes. Over the past two decades, N-body simulations, semi-analytic models, idealized hydrodynamical simulations, cosmological hydrodynamical simulations, and zoom-in hydrodynamical simulations have all provided crucial insights into the fundamental causes and specific mechanisms of galaxy quenching. Throughout this part of the review, we discuss intrinsic routes to massive galaxy quenching from strong baryonic feedback - including supernovae and active galactic nuclei (in both the ejective and preventative modes). Additionally, we discuss dynamical stabilization and the role of mergers. We go on to consider environmental routes to quenching via both ram pressure and dynamical stripping, and as a consequence of the location of satellite galaxies within the cosmic web. We review observational tests of the fundamental causes, specific mechanisms, and triggering of quenching from various techniques. Finally, we conclude this review with tentative answers to the major outstanding issues in this field.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

17 extracted references · 7 canonical work pages

  1. [5]

    arXiv e-prints arXiv:2508.08577. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2508.08577, arXiv:2508.08577 [astro-ph.GA] Zinger E, Pillepich A, Nelson D, et al (2020) Ejective and preventative: the Illus- trisTNG black hole feedback and its effects on the thermodynamics of the gas within and around galaxies. MNRAS 499(1):768. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/staa2607 Zing...

    doi:10.48550/arxiv.2508.08577 2020

  2. [6]

    ApJ 868(2):126. https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/aae8e8, arXiv:1809.01545 [astro-ph.GA] Cheung E, Faber SM, Koo DC, et al (2012) The dependence of quenching upon the inner structure of galaxies at 0.5≤z <0.8 in the DEEP2/AEGIS survey. ApJ 760(2):131. https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/760/2/131 Cheung E, Athanassoula, E., et al (2013) Galaxy Zoo: Observin...

    work page Pith review arXiv 2012

  3. [131]

    MNRAS 438(2):1149–1161

    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.18114.x, arXiv:1006.0106 [astro- ph.CO] G¨ urkan, G., Hardcastle MJ, et al (2014) The Wide-field Infrared Survey Explorer properties of complete samples of radio-loud active galactic nucleus. MNRAS 438(2):1149–1161. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stt2264, arXiv:1308.4843 [astro- ph.CO] Hahn C, Bottrell C, Lee KG (20...

    work page arXiv 2014

  4. [207]

    T (1963) Red-shift of the emission lines in the optical spectrum of 3c 48

    https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stx071, arXiv:1610.01159 [astro-ph.GA] 144 Greenstein JL, Matthews, A. T (1963) Red-shift of the emission lines in the optical spectrum of 3c 48. ApJ 138:873. https://doi.org/10.1086/147700 Grimes JP, Heckman, T., et al (2005) A Chandra X-Ray Investigation of the Violent Interstellar Medium: From Dwarf Starbursts to Ultralumi...

    arXiv 1963

  5. [607]

    ApJ 676(1):33–53

    https://doi.org/10.1038/nature03335, arXiv:astro-ph/0502199 [astro-ph] Di Matteo T, Colberg J, Springel V, et al (2008) Direct Cosmological Simulations of the Growth of Black Holes and Galaxies. ApJ 676(1):33–53. https://doi.org/10. 1086/524921, arXiv:0705.2269 [astro-ph] Di Matteo T, Khandai N, DeGraf C, et al (2012) Cold flows and the first quasars. ApJ...

    arXiv 2008

  6. [660]

    ApJS 129(2):493–516

    https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-astro-081913-035722, arXiv:1403.4620 [astro- ph.GA] Heckman TM, Lehnert MD, Strickland DK, et al (2000) Absorption-Line Probes of Gas and Dust in Galactic Superwinds. ApJS 129(2):493–516. https://doi.org/10. 1086/313421, arXiv:astro-ph/0002526 [astro-ph] Henriques BMB, White SDM, Thomas PA, et al (2013) Simulations of the g...

    arXiv 2000

  7. [671]

    ApJ 696(1):891

    https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-astro-081817-051803, arXiv:1806.04680 [astro-ph.GA] Hickox RC, Jones C, Forman WR, et al (2009) Host galaxies, clustering, Eddington ratios, and evolution of radio, X-ray, and infrared-selected AGNs. ApJ 696(1):891. https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/696/1/891 Hickox RC, Mullaney JR, Alexander DM, et al (2014) Black hole var...

    arXiv 2009

  8. [1556]

    AGN Main Sequence

    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.13531.x, arXiv:0710.2157 [astro-ph] McKee CF, Ostriker EC (2007) Theory of Star Formation. ARA&A 45(1):565–687. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.astro.45.051806.110602, arXiv:0707.3514 [astro- ph] McNamara BR, Nulsen PEJ (2007) Heating Hot Atmospheres with Active Galactic Nuclei. ARA&A 45(1):117–175. https://doi.org...

    work page arXiv 2007

Show all 17 references
  1. [1582]

    MNRAS 445(1):955–969

    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.20414.x, arXiv:1201.2397 [astro- ph.CO] Best PN, Ker LM, Simpson, et al (2014) The cosmic evolution of radio-AGN feed- back to z = 1. MNRAS 445(1):955–969. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stu1776, arXiv:1409.0263 [astro-ph.GA] Bigiel, F.,...

    2014

  2. [1728]

    MNRAS 461(2):1202–1221

    https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stv100, arXiv:1501.03819 [astro-ph.GA] Jaff´ e YL, Verheijen MA W, Haines CP, et al (2016) BUDHIES - III: the fate of H I and the quenching of galaxies in evolving environments. MNRAS 461(2):1202–1221. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stw984, arXiv:1...

    2016 arXiv

  3. [2003]

    https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-8711.2003.06897

    MNRAS 344(4):1000–1028. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-8711.2003.06897. x, arXiv:astro-ph/0309134 [astro-ph] Bundy K, Georgakakis A, Nandra K, et al (2008) AEGIS: New Evidence Linking Active Galactic Nuclei to the Quenching of Star Formation. ApJ 681(2):931–943. https://doi.or...

    2008

  4. [2353]

    https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stv740, arXiv:1412.4783 [astro-ph.GA] 177

    arXiv

  5. [2965]

    Star formation histories and stellar population scaling relations of early- type galaxies

    https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stw2792, arXiv:1603.02702 [astro-ph.CO] McDermid RM, Alatalo K, Blitz L, et al (2015) The ATLAS 3D Project - XXX. Star formation histories and stellar population scaling relations of early- type galaxies. MNRAS 448(4):3484–3513. https://doi.org/10...

    2015 arXiv

  6. [2974]

    ApJ 935(2):146

    https://doi.org/10.1086/316846, arXiv:astro-ph/0008182 [astro-ph] Suess KA, Leja J, Johnson BD, et al (2022) Recovering the Star Formation Histo- ries of Recently Quenched Galaxies: The Impact of Model and Prior Choices. ApJ 935(2):146. https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ac82b0...

    2022 arXiv

  7. [3362]

    Fireballs

    https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/sty3336, arXiv:1806.01282 [astro-ph.GA] Trump JR, Sun M, Zeimann GR, et al (2015) The Biases of Optical Line-Ratio Selec- tion for Active Galactic Nuclei and the Intrinsic Relationship between Black Hole Accretion and Galaxy Star Formation. ApJ 81...

    2015 arXiv

  8. [3822]

    PASA 29(4):447–465

    https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stw2864, arXiv:1611.07045 [astro-ph.GA] Maoz D, Mannucci F (2012) Type-Ia Supernova Rates and the Progenitor Problem: A Review. PASA 29(4):447–465. https://doi.org/10.1071/AS11052, arXiv:1111.4492 [astro-ph.CO] 153 Maoz D, Mannucci F, Nelemans G (...

    2012 arXiv

  9. [3860]

    ApJ 539(1):L9–L12

    https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stad1205, arXiv:2205.15325 [astro-ph.GA] Ferrarese L, Merritt D (2000) A Fundamental Relation between Supermassive Black Holes and Their Host Galaxies. ApJ 539(1):L9–L12. https://doi.org/10.1086/ 312838, arXiv:astro-ph/0006053 [astro-ph] Feruglio,...

    2000 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.