Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 4 minor 46 references

Simplified treatment of kinematic corrections to the SZ effect using the boost operator approach

T0 review · 2 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper claims that the relativistic Sunyaev–Zeldovich effect factorizes exactly into thermal and kinematic pieces before any expansion.

desk verdict A genuinely simpler SZ derivation that reproduces known results; the all-orders claim is credible, but the Section 4 closed forms are unproven conjectures, honestly flagged. read the letter →

arxiv 2608.07404 v1 pith:ZN2QJ6YE submitted 2026-08-07 astro-ph.CO astro-ph.GA

Alex Hoey , Jacob Long , Jens Chluba This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.COastro-ph.GA
keywords Sunyaev-ZeldovicheffectkinematicSZthermalboostoperatorDopplerrelativisticcorrectionsCMBspectraldistortionsgalaxyclusters
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper claims that the relativistic Sunyaev–Zeldovich (SZ) signal from a hot, moving electron cloud is described by a single operator, $\hat{S}_{\rm SZ}(\nu,\hat\gamma,\theta_e,\beta_p)$, exact in both electron temperature $\theta_e$ and bulk velocity $\beta_p$ before either quantity is expanded. The novel ordering is to perform the thermal average in the electron cloud rest frame, where the electron distribution is isotropic, and only then boost into the CMB frame, so the thermal physics lives in operators depending only on $\theta_e$ and the kinematic physics lives in Doppler operators depending only on $\beta_p$. This avoids the entangled multidimensional integrals of the earlier frame choice and makes higher-order corrections linear combinations of already computed pieces. The paper recovers the known kinematic corrections through cubic order in $\beta_p$ and the leading temperature correction, and derives a closed-form expansion of the monopole thermal SZ operator to all orders in $\theta_e$.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the boost operator $\hat{B}$, which maps multipole coefficients of frequency-dependent sky observables between frames, and its derived product, the Doppler operator $\hat{D} = \gamma^{-1} \hat{B}(-\beta)\hat{B}(\beta)$, which carries the angular structure of scattering into and out of the electron rest frame. The key move is doing the thermal average over an isotropic relativistic Maxwellian in the cloud frame first, so the thermal SZ operators $\hat{S}^{\rm th}_\ell(\nu,\theta_e)$ are computed once and then combined with velocity-only Doppler operators $\hat{D}^0_{\ell\ell'0}(\nu,\beta_p)$. The identity Eq. (3.13), equating this factorized form to the previous scattering calculation, is what the claimed exactness rests on. A secondary result is a closed-form expansion of the function $\cosh(k\,{\rm arsinh}\,p)/\sqrt{1+p^2}$, which yields closed forms for the monopole Doppler operators and hence for the thermal SZ operator to all orders in $\theta_e$.

What would settle it

Evaluate both sides of Eq. (3.13) at fourth order in $\beta_p$ and fifth order in $\theta_e$ (or any order beyond the checked ones) using the supplied Mathematica notebook: any mismatch between the factorized operator and the direct scattering integral would disprove the exactness claim. The conjectured closed forms for $\hat{D}_{020}$ and $\hat{D}_{\ell0\ell}$ could likewise be falsified by expanding them beyond $p^{20}$.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is Eq. (3.12): the lab-frame spectral distortion is $\Delta n_{\rm th} = \tau \hat{S}_{\rm SZ}(\nu,\hat\gamma,\theta_e,\beta_p) n_{\rm Pl}(\nu)$, with $\hat{S}_{\rm SZ} = \sum_{\ell} \hat{S}_\ell(\nu,\theta_e,\beta_p) P_\ell(\hat\gamma\cdot\hat\beta_p)$ and $\hat{S}_\ell = \sqrt{2\ell+1} \sum_{\ell'} \hat{D}^0_{\ell\ell'0}(\nu,\beta_p) \hat{S}^{\rm th}_{\ell'}(\nu,\theta_e)$. Here $\hat{D}^0_{\ell\ell'0}$ is the Doppler operator built from two boost operators and $\hat{S}^{\rm th}_{\ell'}$ is the thermally averaged scattering operator computed once in the cloud rest frame. The paper states that this operator contains all orders in both $\theta_e$ and $\beta_p$, with the thermal and kinematic dependences factorized. The factorization is checked against the earlier direct scattering calculation through the identity Eq. (3.13), validated with Mathematica to third order in $\beta_p$ and fourth order in $\theta_e$; the expanded operators reproduce the known literature results through $O(\beta_p^3)$ and the leading $\theta_e$ correction.

Load-bearing premise

The claimed all-order exactness rests on the unproven identity Eq. (3.13), which is only verified numerically to third order in cluster speed and fourth order in temperature; if that identity fails at higher orders, the factorization is not exact.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The kinematic SZ signal through $O(\beta_p^3)$ and its leading thermal correction follow from a few operator products, and any higher order can be generated by linear combinations of the already-computed thermal operators.
  • At a given order in $\beta_p$, only multipoles $\ell' \le$ that order are needed, giving a controlled truncation and no risk of missing terms.
  • The closed-form monopole thermal SZ operator reproduces the tSZ operator at arbitrary order in $\theta_e$ from a single expression, although the high-frequency series remains asymptotic and non-convergent.
  • The same rest-frame-first boost sequence can be applied to polarized SZ scattering and to observer motion, as the paper notes.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If Eq. (3.13) is exact, then the Doppler operators must satisfy hidden algebraic identities that a formal proof could expose; those identities may in turn prove the conjectured closed forms for $\hat{D}_{\ell0\ell}$ and the maximal-$m$ operators.
  • The rest-frame-first ordering should transfer to any radiative-transfer problem with an isotropic distribution in a moving frame, such as scattering in outflows, jets, or rotating atmospheres, where the thermal and kinematic dependences are currently entangled.
  • The lack of a pattern for the $m$-averaged Doppler operators with all indices $\ell>0$ suggests that the maximal-$m$ elements found here are the natural building blocks; a closed-form kSZ operator may require new selection rules for these elements.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper presents a reorganization of the relativistic Sunyaev-Zeldovich calculation using the boost operator formalism. The authors boost the CMB photon field into the rest frame of the moving electron cloud, perform the thermal average there, and boost back to the CMB frame. This yields the operator expression (3.12), which is claimed to be exact in both electron temperature θe and cluster peculiar velocity βp. The equivalence with the previously derived SZ operator is phrased as identity (3.13) and checked with Mathematica to O(βp^3) and O(θe^4). From this factorized form the paper reproduces known kinematic and thermal-kinematic SZ corrections through Eqs. (3.14)–(3.16), and then derives a closed-form expansion for the monopole thermal SZ operator in Section 4, Eqs. (4.7)–(4.11), with the coefficient formulas for −1D020 and −1Dℓ0ℓ obtained by inspection of the low-order series.

Significance. If Eq. (3.12) is exact, the factorization of thermal and kinematic SZ physics is a useful conceptual and computational advance: it replaces coupled βp–θe expansions with independent expansions, and it clarifies the operator structure through the Doppler operators. The paper has genuine strengths: it reproduces known kSZ results to the orders previously available, it provides explicit operator lists in Appendix B, and the authors state that a Mathematica notebook is available for higher orders. The weakness is that the all-orders exactness rests on an identity that is verified only to finite order and on closed-form formulas that are explicitly unproved. These gaps are load-bearing for the paper's headline claims, so the manuscript needs revision before the claims can be accepted.

major comments (2)
  1. [Section 3, after Eq. (3.13)] The claim that Eq. (3.12) is exact to all orders in θe and βp is not established. The identity (3.13) is the only direct check connecting the new factorized operator to the previously derived SZ operator, and the text states that it was validated only to third order in βp and fourth order in θe. The footnote to Eq. (3.13) concedes that the equality holds only after the momentum integrals are performed, not at the level of the integrands, so a term-by-term proof is not available. Since the abstract and Section 5 assert exactness to all orders, the authors should either provide a proof of (3.13) or explicitly state that the all-orders statement is a formal conjecture supported by finite-order checks; otherwise the claim overreaches the evidence.
  2. [Section 4.2, Eq. (4.8); Section 4.3, Eq. (4.12)] The closed-form expressions for −1D020 and −1Dℓ0ℓ are introduced as 'inspection of these coefficients' and are explicitly stated to lack a formal proof, with confirmation only to O(p^20) (and ℓ≤8 in the second case). These unproved formulas are then used in Eq. (4.11), which is presented as the closed-form tSZ operator and summarized as a main result in Section 5. This is a load-bearing step: if either formula fails at higher order, Eq. (4.11) is not correct. The authors should prove these formulas, or present them explicitly as conjectures with the corresponding conclusions softened.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Section 3.2 and Appendix B] The symbol p_p is used as an expansion variable before it is defined; define p_p = βp γp at first use.
  2. [Footnotes to Eq. (3.13) and Eq. (4.8)] The caveat that the identity holds only after integration and the caveat that the closed form is unproved are important enough to be reflected in the abstract and conclusions, not only in footnotes.
  3. [Appendix C, Eq. (C.8)] Equation (C.8) is written as an expression for a_n but contains a sum over n and the variable x; it should be written as f(x)=... with a_n=... for clarity.
  4. [Eq. (2.3)] The sentence beginning 'Where D...' after the displayed equation should have a lowercase 'w' and should be a complete grammatical sentence.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the new SZ operator is obtained by exact boost transformations from a prior thermal SZ operator, and Eq. (3.13) is a finite-order consistency cross-check, not a fitted input or definitional reduction.

full rationale

Walking the derivation chain: Eq. (3.1b) is taken from [14,36] as the exact cloud-frame thermal SZ operator; Eqs. (3.2)-(3.6) apply the boost transformation (2.1) from [13] and Wigner-D orthogonality; Eq. (3.12) then follows algebraically for a lab-frame monopole. None of these steps defines the new SZ operator as equal to the previous kSZ result. The identity (3.13) is introduced only after the new operator is already constructed, as a comparison identity with [14]; it is not used to derive (3.12) and does not constrain the factorization. The Mathematica verification to O(beta_p^3) and O(theta_e^4) is a finite-order consistency check, not a fit of parameters, and therefore is a verification gap rather than a circular step. The closed-form expressions (4.7), (4.8), (4.11), and (4.12) are derived from the operator algebra in Section 4.1 and Appendix C; Eqs. (4.8) and (4.12) are pattern-inferred and confirmed numerically to O(p^20), which weakens the word 'derive' but is not circularity. The self-citations to [13,14,36,21] supply the boost-operator formalism and the prior thermal SZ operator; these are parameter-free analytic inputs whose assumptions do not include the kinematic result being claimed, so under the review rules they count as independent support rather than circular self-citation. The paper's main limitation is the unproven, finite-order-validated identity (3.13) and the conjectural closed forms for higher multipoles, but these concern proof completeness and correctness risk, not circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No free parameters are fitted. The paper relies on the boost operator formalism and previous SZ operator results, all from the same group, but these are published derivations. The new factorization identity is validated only to finite order, and the closed forms for some Doppler operators are conjectural.

assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption The boost operator formalism as defined in [13] correctly describes frame transformations of multipole coefficients of frequency-dependent observables.
    Central to the derivation; Section 2 introduces it citing [13] without proof.
  • domain assumption The thermally averaged SZ operator S_th_l(nu',theta_e) in the cloud frame, taken from [14,36], is valid for arbitrary incoming photon multipoles n'_lm.
    The derivation in Section 3 relies on this generalization to anisotropic photon fields; see Eq. (3.1b).
  • domain assumption Thomson scattering in the optically thin, single-scattering limit is sufficient for the central claim.
    Stated in Section 3 before Eq. (3.1a); multiple scattering is neglected.
  • ad hoc to paper The identity in Eq. (3.13) linking the factorized form to the prior result holds to all orders.
    Validated only to O(beta_p^3) and O(theta_e^4) in Mathematica, not proven; underpins the 'exact to all orders' claim.
  • ad hoc to paper The closed-form expressions for -1D020 in Eq. (4.8) and -1D_l0l in Eq. (4.12) are inferred from coefficient inspection and hold to all orders.
    Authors state no formal proof, only checks to O(p^20) and up to l=8 in Mathematica.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Simplified treatment of kinematic corrections to the SZ effect using the boost operator approach." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/ZN2QJ6YE

@misc{pith2026260807404,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Simplified treatment of kinematic corrections to the SZ effect using the boost operator approach},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/ZN2QJ6YE}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2608.07404}
}
read the original abstract

The Sunyaev-Zeldovich (SZ) effects provide a potent cosmological probe of the large-scale structure in the universe. Here, we present a simplified derivation of the kinematic corrections to the relativistic thermal SZ effect using the boost operator approach. By first performing the thermal average inside the moving electron cloud frame, the thermal and peculiar motion contributions can be naturally separated, leading to a significant simplification of the scattering calculation. The angular dependence of the problem is resummed into the pre-computed Doppler operators avoiding the otherwise cumbersome many-dimensional angular integrals required using conventional approaches. We provide expressions for the relativistic SZ signal, exact to all orders in the electron temperature theta_e and the peculiar velocity beta_p of a given cluster. These reproduce well-known results for the relativistic SZ effects and extend the description to higher orders in the cluster's speed. We also derive a closed-form expression for the thermally-averaged thermal SZ scattering operator by studying the underlying symmetries of the Doppler operators fundamental to the formalism. Through these results, we also demonstrate how the boost operator approach gives clarity to the physical description of the problem at hand, promising to be useful to a wide range of astrophysical problems.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

46 extracted references · 46 canonical work pages

  1. [14]

    Boost operator approach to the relativistic SZ effect.MNRAS, 547(1):stag240, March 2026

    Jens Chluba and Erik Rosenberg. Boost operator approach to the relativistic SZ effect.MNRAS, 547(1):stag240, March 2026

    work page 2026

  2. [12]

    Chluba, E

    J. Chluba, E. Switzer, K. Nelson, and D. Nagai. Sunyaev-Zeldovich signal processing and temperature-velocity moment method for individual clusters.MNRAS, 430:3054–3069, April 2013. – 13 –

    work page 2013

  3. [31]

    Nozawa, N

    S. Nozawa, N. Itoh, and Y . Kohyama. Relativistic Corrections to the Sunyaev-Zeldovich Effect for Clusters of Galaxies. II. Inclusion of Peculiar Velocities.ApJ, 508:17–24, November 1998

    work page 1998

  4. [36]

    Boost operator approach to the relativistic polarized SZ effect.arXiv e-prints, page arXiv:2511.11377, November 2025

    Erik Rosenberg and Jens Chluba. Boost operator approach to the relativistic polarized SZ effect.arXiv e-prints, page arXiv:2511.11377, November 2025

    work page arXiv 2025

  5. [1]

    Mapping the kinetic sunyaev-zel´dovich effect toward macs j0717.5+3745 with nika.A&A, 598:A115, 2017

    Adam et al. Mapping the kinetic sunyaev-zel´dovich effect toward macs j0717.5+3745 with nika.A&A, 598:A115, 2017

    work page 2017

  6. [2]

    Birkinshaw

    M. Birkinshaw. The Sunyaev-Zel’dovich effect.Phys. Rep, 310:97–195, March 1999

    work page 1999

  7. [3]

    Butler, Richard M

    Victoria L. Butler, Richard M. Feder, Tansu Daylan, Adam B. Mantz, Dale Mercado, Alfredo Montaña, Stephen K. N. Portillo, Jack Sayers, Benjamin J. Vaughan, Michael Zemcov, and Adi Zitrin. Measurement of the Relativistic Sunyaev-Zeldovich Correction in RX J1347.5-1145.ApJ, 932(1):55, June 2022

    work page 2022

  8. [4]

    J. E. Carlstrom, G. P. Holder, and E. D. Reese. Cosmology with the Sunyaev-Zel’dovich Effect. ARA&A, 40:643–680, 2002

    work page 2002

Show all 46 references
  1. [5]

    Challinor and A

    A. Challinor and A. Lasenby. Relativistic Corrections to the Sunyaev-Zeldovich Effect.ApJ, 499:1–+, May 1998

    1998

  2. [6]

    Challinor and F

    A. Challinor and F. van Leeuwen. Peculiar velocity effects in high-resolution microwave background experiments.Phys.Rev.D, 65(10):103001–+, May 2002

    2002

  3. [7]

    J. Chluba. Fast and accurate computation of the aberration kernel for the cosmic microwave background sky.MNRAS, 415:3227–3236, August 2011

    2011

  4. [8]

    Chluba and L

    J. Chluba and L. Dai. Multiple scattering Sunyaev-Zeldovich signal - II. Relativistic effects.MNRAS, 438:1324–1334, February 2014

    2014

  5. [9]

    Chluba, L

    J. Chluba, L. Dai, and M. Kamionkowski. Multiple scattering Sunyaev-Zeldovich signal - I. Lowest order effect.MNRAS, 437:67–76, January 2014

    2014

  6. [10]

    Chluba, G

    J. Chluba, G. Hütsi, and R. A. Sunyaev. Clusters of galaxies in the microwave band: Influence of the motion of the Solar System.A&A, 434:811–817, May 2005

    2005

  7. [11]

    Chluba, D

    J. Chluba, D. Nagai, S. Sazonov, and K. Nelson. A fast and accurate method for computing the Sunyaev-Zel’dovich signal of hot galaxy clusters.MNRAS, 426:510–530, October 2012

    2012

  8. [13]

    The Boost Operator: Properties, Computation and Applications

    Jens Chluba and Andrea Ravenni. The Boost Operator: Properties, Computation and Applications. arXiv e-prints, page arXiv:2505.02080, May 2025

    2025 arXiv

  9. [15]

    Coulton, Adriaan J

    William R. Coulton, Adriaan J. Duivenvoorden, Zachary Atkins, Nicholas Battaglia, Elia Stefano Battistelli, J. Richard Bond, Hongbo Cai, Erminia Calabrese, Steve K. Choi, Kevin T. Crowley, Mark J. Devlin, Jo Dunkley, Simone Ferraro, Yilun Guan, Carlos Hervías-Caimapo, J. Colin...

    2026

  10. [16]

    Dai and J

    L. Dai and J. Chluba. New operator approach to the CMB aberration kernels in harmonic space. Phys.Rev.D, 89(12):123504, June 2014

    2014

  11. [17]

    Cordiner, Doug Johnstone, Eelco van Kampen, Daizhong Liu, Thomas J

    Luca Di Mascolo, Yvette Perrott, Tony Mroczkowski, Srinivasan Raghunathan, Stefano Andreon, Stefano Ettori, Aurora Simionescu, Joshiwa van Marrewijk, Claudia Cicone, Minju Lee, Dylan Nelson, Laura Sommovigo, Mark Booth, Pamela Klaassen, Paola Andreani, Martin A. Cordiner, Doug...

    2025

  12. [18]

    Erler, K

    J. Erler, K. Basu, J. Chluba, and F. Bertoldi. Planck’s view on the spectrum of the Sunyaev-Zeldovich effect.MNRAS, 476:3360–3381, May 2018

    2018

  13. [19]

    R. Fabbri. Spectrum of the Sunyaev-Zel’dovich effect for high electron temperatures.ApSS, 77:529–537, July 1981

    1981

  14. [20]

    S. H. Hansen, S. Pastor, and D. V . Semikoz. First Measurement of Cluster Temperature Using the Thermal Sunyaev-Zel’dovich Effect.ApJL, 573:L69–L71, July 2002

    2002

  15. [21]

    Derivation of the kompaneets equation using the boost operator approach.Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics, 2026(06):045, jun 2026

    Alex Hoey, Jacob Long, and Jens Chluba. Derivation of the kompaneets equation using the boost operator approach.Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics, 2026(06):045, jun 2026

    2026

  16. [22]

    G. Hurier. High significance detection of the tSZ effect relativistic corrections.A&A, 596:A61, December 2016

    2016

  17. [23]

    N. Itoh, Y . Kohyama, and S. Nozawa. Relativistic Corrections to the Sunyaev-Zeldovich Effect for Clusters of Galaxies.ApJ, 502:7–+, July 1998

    1998

  18. [24]

    S. T. Kay, L. C. Powell, A. R. Liddle, and P. A. Thomas. The Sunyaev-Zel’dovich temperature of the intracluster medium.MNRAS, 386:2110–2114, June 2008

    2008

  19. [25]

    Kay, Weiguang Cui, Klaus Dolag, and Gustavo Yepes

    Elizabeth Lee, Dhayaa Anbajagane, Priyanka Singh, Jens Chluba, Daisuke Nagai, Scott T. Kay, Weiguang Cui, Klaus Dolag, and Gustavo Yepes. A multisimulation study of relativistic SZ temperature scalings in galaxy clusters and groups.MNRAS, 517(4):5303–5324, December 2022

    2022

  20. [26]

    The SZ effect with anisotropic distributions and high energy electrons

    Elizabeth Lee and Jens Chluba. The SZ effect with anisotropic distributions and high energy electrons. JCAP, 2024(7):040, July 2024

    2024

  21. [27]

    Kay, and David J

    Elizabeth Lee, Jens Chluba, Scott T. Kay, and David J. Barnes. Relativistic SZ temperature scaling relations of groups and clusters derived from the BAHAMAS and MACSIS simulations.MNRAS, 493(3):3274–3292, April 2020

    2020

  22. [28]

    Mroczkowski, S

    T. Mroczkowski, S. Dicker, J. Sayers, E. D. Reese, B. Mason, N. Czakon, C. Romero, A. Young, M. Devlin, S. Golwala, P. Korngut, C. Sarazin, J. Bock, P. M. Koch, K.-Y . Lin, S. M. Molnar, E. Pierpaoli, K. Umetsu, and M. Zemcov. A Multi-wavelength Study of the Sunyaev-Zel’dovich...

    2012

  23. [29]

    Astrophysics with the Spatially and Spectrally Resolved Sunyaev-Zeldovich Effects

    Tony Mroczkowski, Daisuke Nagai, Kaustuv Basu, Jens Chluba, Jack Sayers, Rémi Adam, Eugene Churazov, Abigail Crites, Luca Di Mascolo, Dominique Eckert, Juan Macias-Perez, Frédéric Mayet, Laurence Perotto, Etienne Pointecouteau, Charles Romero, Florian Ruppin, Evan Scannapieco,...

    2019

  24. [30]

    Nozawa and et al

    S. Nozawa and et al. An improved formula for the relativistic corrections to the kinematical Sunyaev-Zeldovich effect for clusters of galaxies.Nuovo Cimento B Serie, 121:487–500, May 2006

    2006

  25. [32]

    Nozawa, N

    S. Nozawa, N. Itoh, and Y . Kohyama. Relativistic corrections to the Sunyaev-Zeldovich effect for clusters of galaxies: effect of the motion of the observer.A&A, 440:39–44, September 2005

    2005

  26. [33]

    Refregier, E

    A. Refregier, E. Komatsu, D. N. Spergel, and U.-L. Pen. Power spectrum of the Sunyaev-Zel’dovich effect.Phys.Rev.D, 61(12):123001, June 2000

    2000

  27. [34]

    Can we neglect relativistic temperature corrections in the Planck thermal SZ analysis?MNRAS, 483(3):3459–3464, March 2019

    Mathieu Remazeilles, Boris Bolliet, Aditya Rotti, and Jens Chluba. Can we neglect relativistic temperature corrections in the Planck thermal SZ analysis?MNRAS, 483(3):3459–3464, March 2019

    2019

  28. [35]

    Evidence for relativistic Sunyaev-Zeldovich effect in Planck CMB maps with an average electron-gas temperature ofT e≃5 keV.MNRAS, 538(3):1576–1586, April 2025

    Mathieu Remazeilles and Jens Chluba. Evidence for relativistic Sunyaev-Zeldovich effect in Planck CMB maps with an average electron-gas temperature ofT e≃5 keV.MNRAS, 538(3):1576–1586, April 2025

    2025

  29. [37]

    Ruan, Thomas R

    John J. Ruan, Thomas R. Quinn, and Arif Babul. The observable thermal and kinetic Sunyaev-Zel’dovich effect in merging galaxy clusters.MNRAS, 432(4):3508–3519, July 2013

    2013

  30. [38]

    Dissecting the Compton scattering kernel I: Isotropic media.MNRAS, 490(3):3705–3726, December 2019

    Abir Sarkar, Jens Chluba, and Elizabeth Lee. Dissecting the Compton scattering kernel I: Isotropic media.MNRAS, 490(3):3705–3726, December 2019

    2019

  31. [39]

    Sayers et al

    J. Sayers et al. A measurement of the kinetic sunyaev–zel’dovich signal toward macs j0717.5+3745. The Astrophysical Journal, 778(1):52, nov 2013

    2013

  32. [40]

    S. Y . Sazonov and R. A. Sunyaev. Cosmic Microwave Background Radiation in the Direction of a Moving Cluster of Galaxies with Hot Gas: Relativistic Corrections.ApJ, 508:1–5, November 1998

    1998

  33. [41]

    Neelima Sehgal, Simone Aiola, Yashar Akrami, Kaustuv Basu, Michael Boylan-Kolchin, Sean Bryan, Sébastien Clesse, Francis-Yan Cyr-Racine, Luca Di Mascolo, Simon Dicker, Thomas Essinger-Hileman, Simone Ferraro, George Fuller, Dongwon Han, Matthew Hasselfield, Gil Holder, Bhuvnes...

    2019

  34. [42]

    R. A. Sunyaev and I. B. Zeldovich. The velocity of clusters of galaxies relative to the microwave background - The possibility of its measurement.MNRAS, 190:413–420, February 1980

    1980

  35. [43]

    R. A. Sunyaev and Y . B. Zeldovich. Small-Scale Fluctuations of Relic Radiation.ApSS, 7:3–+, 1970

    1970

  36. [44]

    E. L. Wright. Distortion of the microwave background by a hot intergalactic medium.ApJ, 232:348–351, September 1979. – 15 –

    1979

  37. [45]

    Y . B. Zeldovich and R. A. Sunyaev. The Interaction of Matter and Radiation in a Hot-Model Universe. ApSS, 4:301–316, July 1969

    1969

  38. [46]

    p1−a + −p 1−a − 2p(1−a) #

    M. Zemcov, J. Aguirre, J. Bock, C. M. Bradford, N. Czakon, J. Glenn, S. R. Golwala, R. Lupu, P. Maloney, P. Mauskopf, E. Million, E. J. Murphy, B. Naylor, H. Nguyen, M. Rosenman, J. Sayers, K. S. Scott, and J. Zmuidzinas. High Spectral Resolution Measurement of the Sunyaev-Zel...

    2012

Pith tools

Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.