Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 55 references

Quantitative stability for Bakry--\'Emery log-Sobolev and Talagrand inequalities

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The paper proves that near-extremizers of the Bakry–Émery log-Sobolev and Talagrand inequalities are quantitatively L1-close to explicit translated densities, with optimal radial exponents.

desk verdict Genuine non-Gaussian stability results with an optimal radial exponent, but the key λ→0 limit in the proofs is not justified—the bounding integrand can be infinite for admissible f. read the letter →

arxiv 2608.07996 v1 pith:TJDSIX5I submitted 2026-08-08 math.AP

Alexandru Kristály , Alexandru Pîrvuceanu This is my paper · ORCID
classification math.AP MSC 35A2335R4535B35
keywords log-SobolevinequalityTalagrandtransportBakry–ÉmeryconditionPrékopa–Leindlerstabilityquantitativehypercontractivityequalitycases
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper establishes quantitative stability for the Bakry–Émery log-Sobolev inequality and the Talagrand transport inequality on R^n. It shows that if a positive log-concave function has a very small log-Sobolev deficit, then its normalized square is close in L1 to an explicit density of the form $e^{{V(x)-V(x-x0)}}$; a parallel statement holds for probability measures with small Talagrand deficit. The closeness is controlled by a universal power of the deficit, exponent 1/19, and in the radial case the exponent improves to 1/2, which is optimal. These results imply elementary characterizations of equality cases, and they give a lower bound on the hypercontractivity deficit of the Hopf–Lax semigroup. The proof combines stability of the Prékopa–Leindler inequality with a limiting argument of the kind used to derive these functional inequalities from it.

What carries the argument

The mechanism is a limiting argument built on stability theorems for the Prékopa–Leindler inequality. For each λ∈(0,1) the proof assembles three densities uλ(x)=$e^{{g(x)/(1-λ)-V(x)}}$, v(y)=$e^{{-V(y)}}$, and wλ(z)=$e^{{gλ(z)-V(z)}}$, where g is the logarithm of f² and gλ is a sup-convolution; they satisfy wλ((1-λ)x+λy) ≥ uλ(x)^{1-λ} v(y)^λ. A stability theorem for the Prékopa–Leindler inequality bounds the normalized L1 distance between uλ and a translate of v by C_n (ελ/τλ)^{1/19}, with ελ the deficit of the inequality. A limiting step sends λ→0+; the ratio ελ/τλ is converted, by l'Hospital's rule and dominated convergence, into the log-Sobolev deficit (or, in the Talagrand case, into the Talagrand deficit), and compactness of the translating parameters gives the stated estimates. In the radial case the same construction is fed through an improved stability theorem whose 1/2 exponent is inherited.

What would settle it

Take a sequence of positive log-concave functions with deficits δ_k → 0 and compute their L1 distance to the nearest density $e^{{V(x)-V(x-x0)}}$. Finding a sequence whose distance decays slower than $δ_k^{{1/19}}$ (or slower than $δ_k^{{1/2}}$ for a radial example) would refute the theorem; the paper's own optimality calculation for the 1/2 exponent provides the matching example where the distance decays exactly like $δ^{{1/2}}$.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central discovery is that the deficit in either inequality controls an explicit L1 distance to a translated reference density. For every positive log-concave f in $W^{{1,2}}$(R^n, μV) with δ_LSI < $C_n^{{-19}}$, there is x0 with ∫ |f²/α - $e^{{V(x)-V(x-x0)}}$| dμV ≤ C_n $δ_LSI^{{1/19}}$; and for every probability ν ≪ μV with δ_Tal < $C_n^{{-19}}$, the density built from the optimal transport potential and its inf-convolution satisfies an analogous L1 bound. In the radial cases the exponent becomes 1/2 and is shown optimal. A corollary is the equality characterization: equality in the log-Sobolev inequality forces f(x)=a $e^{{⟨x0,x⟩}}$ with x0 in the kernel of ∇²V - cI, and equality in the Talagrand inequality forces ν to be a translate of μV by such a direction. The hypercontractivity deficit of the Hopf–Lax semigroup is bounded below by an integrated log-Sobolev deficit, which yields its equality case.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing step is that the λ→0 limiting process is justified for merely log-concave functions, where only almost-everywhere differentiability is available; the proof invokes dominated convergence and l'Hospital's rule in this low-regularity setting without writing out the full justification.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Functions with log-Sobolev deficit below C_n^{-19} are, up to a small L1 error, one of the densities e^{V(x)-V(x-x0)}; this makes the qualitative rigidity of near-extremizers quantitative.
  • Probability measures with Talagrand deficit below the same threshold are L1-close to a translate of μV, with the distance-to-translate controlled by δ^{1/19}.
  • In the radial setting, both deficits have the optimal 1/2 exponent; no absolute exponent larger than 1/2 can work for the whole family of Bakry–Émery potentials.
  • Equality in the log-Sobolev inequality holds exactly for f(x)=a e^{⟨x0,x⟩} with x0 in Ker(∇²V - cI); equality in the Talagrand inequality holds exactly for translated copies of μV in these same directions.
  • The Hopf–Lax hypercontractivity deficit is at least c∫_0^t q(τ)^{-2} δ_LSI(e^{q(τ)Qτu/2}) dτ, and its equality case forces u to be affine with slope in the kernel and q to be affine.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The universal 1/19 exponent appears to inherit the exponent from the external Prékopa–Leindler stability theorem rather than from the geometry of the log-Sobolev inequality itself; if sharper Prékopa–Leindler stability becomes available, the same limiting skeleton should improve the exponent 1/19 while keeping the L1 distance.
  • The kernel condition x0 ∈ Ker(∇²V - cI) means the extremizers are Gaussian factors only along the directions where V is exactly quadratic; non-Gaussian potentials with flat quadratic directions still exhibit the same stability and equality theory, so the result is not a Gaussian-only phenomenon.
  • A natural next test is whether the optimal 1/2 exponent extends beyond radial symmetry under, say, a Poincaré or spectral-gap assumption; the current proof needs radiality only to invoke the improved Prékopa–Leindler stability, so the obstacle appears technical rather than conceptual.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. This paper studies quantitative stability for the Bakry--Emery log-Sobolev inequality and Talagrand transport inequality on R^n under the curvature condition ∇²V − cI_n ≥ 0. The main theorems claim that, for log-concave functions (or measures) with sufficiently small deficit, the L¹ distance to an explicit translate of the reference density is controlled by a power of the deficit, with universal exponent 1/19, improved to the optimal 1/2 in the radial case. The proofs use Prékopa--Leindler stability theorems of Böröczky--De and Figalli--Ramos through a Maurey-type argument, and the results are applied to equality cases and to the Hopf--Lax hypercontractivity deficit.

Significance. The results, if fully established, would be a significant advance: they move quantitative L¹ stability beyond the Gaussian setting to general Bakry--Emery measures, identify equality cases algebraically via Ker(∇²V − cI_n), and give optimal radial exponents with explicit test families. The use of external Prékopa--Leindler stability results and the explicit optimality computations are strengths. However, the main L¹ estimate for the log-Sobolev inequality depends on a limiting step that is not justified as written; this must be repaired before the central claims can be considered proven.

major comments (3)
  1. [§3.1, Eqs. (3.5)–(3.9)] The l'Hospital limit in (3.9) is not justified, and in fact the upper bound in (3.5) is infinite for admissible data. Take n=1, c=1, V(x)=x²/2+const (standard Gaussian), and for t>0 set g_t(x)=−e^{tx}, f_t=e^{g_t/2}. Then f_t is positive and log-concave, belongs to W^{1,2}(R,μ_V), and δ_LSI(f_t)→0 as t→0, so for small t it satisfies the hypothesis of Theorem 1.1. However, for every λ>0 the integral on the right-hand side of (3.5) equals ∫ exp(−e^{tx}+λ t²/(2(1−λ)) e^{2tx}) dμ_V(x), which is +∞ because the exponent tends to +∞ as x→∞. Thus (3.5) reads ∞≤∞; there is no finite function of λ to differentiate, and (3.9) does not follow from the preceding estimates. Since (3.9) is the bridge from Prékopa–Leindler stability to the deficit estimate (1.2), the proof of Theorem 1.1 is incomplete as written.
  2. [§3.2, proof of Theorem 1.2/(i)] The radial proof explicitly repeats the argument of §3.1, applying Corollary 2.1 instead of Proposition 2.1. It therefore inherits the same invalid λ→0 limiting step. The improved exponent 1/2 in (1.3) is not established by the current proof; a repair of the limiting step in §3.1, or a separate radial argument, is needed.
  3. [§3.1, Eq. (3.6)] The differentiation under the integral in (3.6) is asserted as a 'simple computation' with no domination argument. For the admissible functions g_t in the previous comment, no such domination exists: the λ-dependent integral is infinite for every λ>0. Even if one restricted to functions for which the integral is finite, the manuscript gives no reason that the derivative can be interchanged with the integral for merely log-concave g∈W^{1,2}. The theorem's hypotheses therefore need either a different upper bound, a regularization argument, or an additional structural assumption on g.
minor comments (4)
  1. [§4.1, Eq. (4.4)] The computation of lim_{λ→0} ε_λ/τ_λ in (4.4) is stated without details; since g is only known to satisfy that x↦(c/2)|x|²+g(x) is convex, a uniform domination argument for derivatives near λ=0 should be supplied.
  2. [§3.1, Eq. (3.8)] The passage from (3.8) to the l'Hospital computation uses the dominated convergence theorem, but no dominating function is exhibited for e^{g/(1−λ)} as λ→0+. For concave g that can take positive values, this is not automatic from f∈W^{1,2}.
  3. [§4.2, Eq. (4.13)] The identity after (4.13) is written 'for every x∈R^n' but the preceding integration is over x with respect to μ_V; it should say 'for μ_V-a.e. x' or be understood in the integrated sense.
  4. [§3.3] In the optimality proof, the displayed quantity after 'Dividing (3.12) by ε' labels the left-hand side as LHS and then asserts an equality with a liminf; since only a liminf inequality is needed, the equality sign should be replaced by ≥ to be precise.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No circular derivation: external Prékopa–Leindler stability theorems and standard transport/entropy tools drive the proof; self-citations are contextual and non-load-bearing.

full rationale

The main estimates (1.2), (1.5), (1.3), and (1.6) are obtained by applying the external stability theorems of Böröczky–De (Theorem 2.1) and Figalli–Ramos (Theorem 2.2) to auxiliary functions (3.1) and (4.1), then passing to the limit. The limiting identities (3.9) and (4.4) express the log-Sobolev and Talagrand deficits as limits of Prékopa–Leindler deficits; this is the Maurey-type derivation itself, not a restatement of the desired conclusion. The equality cases are deduced from the stability estimates plus Kantorovich duality and the Donsker–Varadhan formula, all external benchmarks. The self-citations present in the paper are not load-bearing: [5] is acknowledged as a Gaussian predecessor, [4] only defines an admissible function class, and [6] is one supporting reference for a Lipschitz-regularity argument also credited to Bobkov–Ledoux. No parameter is fitted to data and no prediction is identified with an input by construction. The skeptical concern about the l'Hospital step in (3.5)–(3.9) is a potential integrability gap (the upper-bound integrand may be infinite for some admissible log-concave f), but that is a correctness risk, not a circularity: it does not make the claimed bound equal to its hypothesis. Accordingly, the paper shows no significant circular reasoning; the score reflects only the presence of minor, non-load-bearing self-citations.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 8 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No free parameters are fitted; all constants are dimension-dependent but not tuned to data. The results rest on standard optimal-transport and entropy tools and on two external Prekopa-Leindler stability theorems. No new entities are introduced.

assumptions (8)
  • domain assumption Bakry-Emery condition: V in C^2(R^n) and nabla^2 V - c I >= 0 for some c > 0, so V is c-uniformly convex.
    Used throughout to guarantee the log-Sobolev inequality (1.1), Talagrand inequality (1.4), hypercontractivity, and the quadratic growth estimate (3.3).
  • standard math Boroczky-De quantitative Prekopa-Leindler stability (Theorem 2.1) with exponent 1/19 and dimension-dependent constant c n^n n.
    The main input behind Theorems 1.1 and 1.3 via Proposition 2.1; cited as [17].
  • standard math Figalli-Ramos radial Prekopa-Leindler stability (Theorem 2.2) with exponent 1/2.
    The input behind radial Theorems 1.2 and 1.4 via Corollary 2.1; cited as [33].
  • standard math Existence and duality of optimal transport: Brenier map T(x) = x + (1/c) nabla g(x) and Kantorovich duality relation (4.5).
    Used in the Talagrand stability and equality proofs in Section 4.1; cited to Brenier, McCann, and Villani.
  • standard math Donsker-Varadhan variational formula for relative entropy and its equality case.
    Used to identify dnu/dmu from equality in the entropy bound in Section 4.2; cited as [27].
  • standard math HWI inequality of Otto and Villani relating entropy, Wasserstein distance, and Fisher information.
    Used in Corollary 4.1 and in the Theorem 1.5 equality proof to transfer log-Sobolev equality to Talagrand equality; cited as [51].
  • standard math Hopf-Lax semigroup properties: Hamilton-Jacobi equation (5.1), semigroup composition (5.7), and local Lipschitz regularity under the growth condition (1.9).
    Used in Section 5 for the hypercontractivity deficit; cited to Bobkov, Gentil, and Ledoux [12] and standard Hamilton-Jacobi theory.
  • domain assumption Growth condition |u(x)| <= C1 + C2 |x|^theta with theta in (0,2) for the functions u considered in Theorem 1.5.
    Ensures that Q_t u and the norms in (1.8) are well-defined and nontrivial; introduced in Section 1.3 around equation (1.9).

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Quantitative stability for Bakry--\'Emery log-Sobolev and Talagrand inequalities." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/TJDSIX5I

@misc{pith2026260807996,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Quantitative stability for Bakry--\'Emery log-Sobolev and Talagrand inequalities},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/TJDSIX5I}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2608.07996}
}
abstract

We establish quantitative $L^1$-stability estimates for the Bakry--\'Emery log-Sobolev and Talagrand inequalities with a universal exponent of 1/19 governing the corresponding deficits. Our approach relies on a Maurey-type argument combined with stability estimates for the Pr\'ekopa--Leindler inequality. In the radial setting, the exponent of both deficits can be improved to $1/2,$ which turns out to be optimal. As an application, we establish an estimate for the hypercontractivity deficit of the Hopf--Lax semigroup in the Bakry--\'Emery setting. In particular, these stability results provide elementary characterizations for the equality cases in the previously mentioned inequalities.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

55 extracted references · 53 canonical work pages

  1. [5]

    Sharp stability in hypercontractivity estimates and logarithmic Sobolev inequalities

    Z.M. Balogh and A. Krist´ aly, Sharp stability in hypercontractivity estimates and logarithmic Sobolev inequalities. Preprint, arXiv:https://arxiv.org/abs/2508.21552, 2025

    work page Pith review arXiv 2025

  2. [1]

    Aubin, Probl` emes isop´ erim´ etriques et espaces de Sobolev.J

    T. Aubin, Probl` emes isop´ erim´ etriques et espaces de Sobolev.J. Differential Geom.11 (4) (1976), 573–598

    work page 1976

  3. [2]

    Arnold, P

    A. Arnold, P. Markowich, G. Toscani, and A. Unterreiter, On logarithmic Sobolev inequalities, and the rate of convergence to equilibrium for Fokker–Planck type equations.Comm. Partial Differential Equations, (2001), 26:1-2, 43–100

    work page 2001

  4. [3]

    Bakry and M

    D. Bakry and M. ´Emery, Diffusions hypercontractives, S´ eminaire de Probabilit´ es XIX 1983/84,Lecture Notes in Math.1123 (1985), 177–206

    work page 1985

  5. [4]

    Balogh and A

    Z.M. Balogh and A. Krist´ aly, Logarithmic-Sobolev inequalities on non-compact Euclidean submanifolds: sharpness and rigidity.J. Eur. Math. Soc., accepted 2026, DOI:10.4171/JEMS/1773

    work page doi:10.4171/jems/1773 2026

  6. [6]

    Balogh, A

    Z.M. Balogh, A. Krist´ aly, and F. Tripaldi, Sharp log-Sobolev inequalities inCD(0, N) spaces with applications.J. Funct. Anal.286 (2024), no. 2, Paper No. 110217, 41 pp

    work page 2024

  7. [7]

    N. Bez, S. Nakamura, and H. Tsuji, Stability of hypercontractivity, the logarithmic Sobolev inequality, and Tala- grands cost inequality.J. Funct. Anal.285 (2023), no. 10, Paper No. 110121, 66 pp

    work page 2023

  8. [8]

    Bianchi and H

    G. Bianchi and H. Egnell, A note on the Sobolev inequality.J. Funct. Anal.100 (1991), no. 1, 18–24

    work page 1991

Show all 55 references
  1. [9]

    Brenier, Polar factorization and monotone rearrangement of vector valued functions.Comm

    Y. Brenier, Polar factorization and monotone rearrangement of vector valued functions.Comm. Pure Appl. Math. 44 (1991), 375–417. 22 ALEXANDRU KRIST ´ALY∗ & ALEXANDRU PˆIR VUCEANU

    1991

  2. [10]

    Br´ ezis and E.H

    H. Br´ ezis and E.H. Lieb, Sobolev inequalities with remainder terms.J. Funct. Anal.100 (1985), 73–86

    1985

  3. [11]

    Brigati, J

    G. Brigati, J. Dolbeault, and N. Simonov, Logarithmic Sobolev inequalities: a review on stability and instability results.Matematica5 (2026), article no. 5, 28 pp

    2026

  4. [12]

    Bobkov, I

    S.G. Bobkov, I. Gentil, and M. Ledoux, Hypercontractivity of Hamilton–Jacobi equations.J. Math. Pures Appl.(9) 80 (2001), no. 7, 669–696

    2001

  5. [13]

    Bobkov and F

    S.G. Bobkov and F. G¨ otze, Exponential integrability and transportation cost related to logarithmic Sobolev inequal- ities.J. Funct. Anal.163 (1999), no. 1, 1–28

    1999

  6. [14]

    Bobkov, N

    S.G. Bobkov, N. Gozlan, C. Roberto, and P.-M. Samson, Bounds on the deficit in the logarithmic Sobolev inequality. J. Funct. Anal.267 (2014), no. 11, 4110–4138

    2014

  7. [15]

    Bobkov and M

    S.G. Bobkov and M. Ledoux, From Brunn–Minkowski to Brascamp–Lieb and to logarithmic Sobolev inequalities. Geom. Funct. Anal.10 (2000), 1028–1052

    2000

  8. [16]

    Bolley, I

    F. Bolley, I. Gentil, and A. Guillin, Dimensional improvements of the logarithmic Sobolev, Talagrand and Brascamp– Lieb inequalities.Ann. Probab.46 (2018), no. 1, 261–301

    2018

  9. [17]

    K. J. B¨ or¨ oczky and A. De, Stability of the Pr´ ekopa–Leindler inequality for log-concave functions.Adv. Math.386 (2021), 107810

    2021

  10. [18]

    Bucur, I

    D. Bucur, I. Fragal` a, Lower bounds for the Pr´ ekopa–Leindler deficit by some distances modulo translations.J. Convex Anal.21 (2014), no. 1, 289–305

    2014

  11. [19]

    Carlen, Superadditivity of Fisher’s information and logarithmic Sobolev inequalities.J

    E.A. Carlen, Superadditivity of Fisher’s information and logarithmic Sobolev inequalities.J. Funct. Anal.101 (1991), no. 1, 194–211

    1991

  12. [20]

    Cianchi, N

    A. Cianchi, N. Fusco, F. Maggi, and A. Pratelli, The sharp Sobolev inequality in quantitative form.J. Eur. Math. Soc. (JEMS)11 (2009), no. 5, 1105–1139

    2009

  13. [21]

    Cordero-Erausquin, Some applications of mass transport to Gaussian-type inequalities.Arch

    D. Cordero-Erausquin, Some applications of mass transport to Gaussian-type inequalities.Arch. Rational Mech. Anal.161 (2002), no. 3, 257–269

    2002

  14. [22]

    Cordero-Erausquin, Transport inequalities for log-concave measures, quantitative forms, and applications.Canad

    D. Cordero-Erausquin, Transport inequalities for log-concave measures, quantitative forms, and applications.Canad. J. Math.69 (2017), no. 3, 481–501

    2017

  15. [23]

    Courtade and M

    T.A. Courtade and M. Fathi, Stability of the Bakry– ´Emery theorem onR n.J. Funct. Anal.279 (2020), no. 2, Paper no. 108523, 28 pp

    2020

  16. [24]

    B. Deng, L. Sun, and J.-C. Wei, Sharp quantitative estimates of Struwe’s decomposition.Duke Math. J.174 (2025), no. 1, 159–228

    2025

  17. [25]

    Dolbeault, M.J

    J. Dolbeault, M.J. Esteban, A. Figalli, R.L. Frank, and M. Loss, Sharp stability for Sobolev and log-Sobolev inequalities, with optimal dimensional dependence.Camb. J. Math.13 (2025), no. 2, 359–430

    2025

  18. [26]

    Dolbeault and G

    J. Dolbeault and G. Toscani, Stability results for logarithmic Sobolev and Gagliardo–Nirenberg inequalities.Int. Math. Res. Not. IMRN(2016), 473–498

    2016

  19. [27]

    Donsker and S.R.S

    M.D. Donsker and S.R.S. Varadhan, Asymptotic evaluation of certain Markov process expectations for large time. III.Comm. Pure Appl. Math.29 (1976), no. 4, 389–461

    1976

  20. [28]

    Fathi, A sharp symmetrized form of Talagrand’s transport-entropy inequality for the Gaussian measure.Elec- tronic Communications in Probability, Volume 23 (2018), paper no

    M. Fathi, A sharp symmetrized form of Talagrand’s transport-entropy inequality for the Gaussian measure.Elec- tronic Communications in Probability, Volume 23 (2018), paper no. 81

    2018

  21. [29]

    Fathi, E

    M. Fathi, E. Indrei, and M. Ledoux, Quantitative logarithmic Sobolev inequalities and stability estimates.Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst.36 (2016), no. 12, 6835–6853

    2016

  22. [30]

    F. Feo, E. Indrei, M.R. Posteraro, and C. Roberto, Some remarks on the stability of the log-Sobolev inequality for the Gaussian measure.Potential Anal.47 (2017), no. 1, 37–52

    2017

  23. [31]

    Figalli and D

    A. Figalli and D. Jerison, Quantitative stability for the Brunn–Minkowski inequality.Adv. Math.314 (2017), 1–47

    2017

  24. [32]

    Figalli, F

    A. Figalli, F. Maggi, and A. Pratelli, A mass transportation approach to quantitative isoperimetric inequalities. Invent. Math.182 (2010), 167–211

    2010

  25. [33]

    Figalli and J.P.G

    A. Figalli and J.P.G. Ramos, Improved stability versions of the Pr´ ekopa–Leindler inequality.J. Convex Anal.32 (2025), no. 1, 291–320

    2025

  26. [34]

    Figalli and Y.R

    A. Figalli and Y.R. Zhang, Sharp gradient stability for the Sobolev inequality.Duke Math. J.171 (2022), no. 12, 2407–2459

    2022

  27. [35]

    Figalli, P

    A. Figalli, P. van Hintum, and M. Tiba, Sharp quantitative stability for the Pr´ ekopa–Leindler and Borell– Brascamp– Lieb inequalities.Preprint, arXiv:https://arxiv.org/abs/2501.04656, 2025

    2025 arXiv

  28. [36]

    Gentil, The general optimalL p-Euclidean logarithmic Sobolev inequality by Hamilton–Jacobi equations.J

    I. Gentil, The general optimalL p-Euclidean logarithmic Sobolev inequality by Hamilton–Jacobi equations.J. Funct. Anal.202(2) (2003), 591–599

    2003

  29. [37]

    Gozlan, The deficit in the Gaussian log-Sobolev inequality and inverse Santal´ o inequalities.Int

    N. Gozlan, The deficit in the Gaussian log-Sobolev inequality and inverse Santal´ o inequalities.Int. Math. Res. Not. IMRN2022 (2022), no. 17, 12940–12983

    2022

  30. [38]

    Gozlan, C

    N. Gozlan, C. Roberto, and P.-M. Samson, A new characterization of Talagrand’s transport-entropy inequalities and applications.Ann. Probab.39 (2011), no. 3, 857–880

    2011

  31. [39]

    Gross, Logarithmic Sobolev inequalities,Am

    L. Gross, Logarithmic Sobolev inequalities,Am. J. Math.97(4) (1975), 1061–1083

    1975

  32. [40]

    Indrei,W 1,1 stability for the LSI.J

    E. Indrei,W 1,1 stability for the LSI.J. Differ. Equ.421 (2025), 196–207. QUANTITATIVE STABILITY 23

    2025

  33. [41]

    Indrei and D

    E. Indrei and D. Kim, Deficit estimates for the logarithmic Sobolev inequality.Differential Integral Equations34 (2021), no. 7-8, 437–466

    2021

  34. [42]

    Indrei and D

    E. Indrei and D. Marcon, A quantitative log-Sobolev inequality for a two parameter family of functions.Int. Math. Res. Not. IMRN2014 (2014), no. 20, 5563–5580

    2014

  35. [43]

    Kim, Instability results for the logarithmic Sobolev inequality and its application to related inequalities.Discrete Contin

    D. Kim, Instability results for the logarithmic Sobolev inequality and its application to related inequalities.Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst.42 (2022), no. 9, 4297–4320

    2022

  36. [44]

    Kolesnikov and E.M

    A.V. Kolesnikov and E.M. Werner, Blaschke–Santal´ o inequality for many functions and geodesic barycenters of measures.Adv. Math.396 (2022), Paper No. 108110, 44 pp

    2022

  37. [45]

    Ledoux, I

    M. Ledoux, I. Nourdin, and G. Peccati, A Stein deficit for the logarithmic Sobolev inequality.Sci. China Math.60 (2017), 1163–1180

    2017

  38. [46]

    J. M. Machado and J.P.G. Ramos, Quantitative stability for the Brascamp–Lieb inequality and moment measures. Preprint, arXiv:https://arxiv.org/abs/2511.22636, 2026

    2026 arXiv

  39. [47]

    Maurey, Some deviations inequalities.Geom

    B. Maurey, Some deviations inequalities.Geom. Func. Anal.1 (1991), 188–197

    1991

  40. [48]

    Mikulincer, Stability of Talagrand’s Gaussian transport-entropy inequality via the F¨ ollmer process.Israel J

    D. Mikulincer, Stability of Talagrand’s Gaussian transport-entropy inequality via the F¨ ollmer process.Israel J. Math.242 (2021), no. 1, 215–241

    2021

  41. [49]

    McCann, Existence and uniqueness of monotone measurepreserving maps.Duke Math

    R.J. McCann, Existence and uniqueness of monotone measurepreserving maps.Duke Math. J.80 (1995), 309–323

    1995

  42. [50]

    Perelman, The entropy formula for the Ricci flow and its geometric applications.Preprint, arXiv:https: //arxiv.org/abs/math/0211159, 2002

    G. Perelman, The entropy formula for the Ricci flow and its geometric applications.Preprint, arXiv:https: //arxiv.org/abs/math/0211159, 2002

    2002 arXiv

  43. [51]

    Otto and C

    F. Otto and C. Villani, Generalization of an inequality by Talagrand and links with the logarithmic Sobolev in- equality.J. Funct. Anal.173 (2000), no. 2, 361–400

    2000

  44. [52]

    Suguro, Stability of the logarithmic Sobolev inequality and uncertainty principle for the Tsallis entropy.Non- linear Anal

    T. Suguro, Stability of the logarithmic Sobolev inequality and uncertainty principle for the Tsallis entropy.Non- linear Anal. 250 (2025), Paper No. 113644, 16 pp

    2025

  45. [53]

    Talenti, Best constants in Sobolev inequality.Ann

    G. Talenti, Best constants in Sobolev inequality.Ann. Mat. Pura Appl.(IV) 110 (1976), 353–372

    1976

  46. [54]

    Yau, Logarithmic Sobolev inequality for lattice gases with mixing conditions.Comm

    H.-T. Yau, Logarithmic Sobolev inequality for lattice gases with mixing conditions.Comm. Math. Phys.181 (1996), no. 2, 367–408

    1996

  47. [55]

    Villani, Topics in Optimal Transportation, Graduate Studies in Mathematics, vol

    C. Villani, Topics in Optimal Transportation, Graduate Studies in Mathematics, vol. 58, American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 2003. Alexandru Krist ´aly: Department of Economics, Babes ¸-Bolyai University, str. Teodor Mihali 58-60, 400591, Cluj-Napoca, Romania & Insti...

    2003

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.