Constructing a Hydrogen Line Library for Ly{\alpha} Emitters at Low Redshifts (z < 0.4): Estimating Dust Extinction and Assessing Paschen line Detectability with SPHEREx

Hyunjin Shim; Hyunmi Song; Junho Song

REVIEW 3 major objections 3 minor 53 references

Constructing a Hydrogen Line Library for Ly{\alpha} Emitters at Low Redshifts (z < 0.4): Estimating Dust Extinction and Assessing Paschen line Detectability with SPHEREx

T0 review · 3 major / 3 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read SPHEREx can detect the Paschen-alpha line in 14 of 192 modeled low-redshift Lyman-alpha galaxies.

desk verdict Solid, honest literature compilation and a clearly-hedged SPHEREx forecast, but the 'reliable detection' counts use a flux-recovery criterion with no S/N minimum and likely overstate the blind-survey yield. read the letter →

arxiv 2608.08393 v1 pith:4CLRJMK7 submitted 2026-08-09 astro-ph.GA

Junho Song , Hyunmi Song , Hyunjin Shim This is my paper · ORCID

classification astro-ph.GA

keywords Ly-alphaemittershydrogenrecombinationlinesBalmerdecrementdustattenuationescapefractionPaschenSPHERExstarformationrate

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper builds a working library of hydrogen recombination line measurements for 260 low-redshift Ly$\alpha$ emitters and puts it to two uses. Balmer-line ratios yield dust attenuation $E(B-V)$ for 85 galaxies, Ly$\alpha$ escape fractions, and, for the 14 galaxies with all three Balmer lines, object-by-object slopes of the dust attenuation curve. The same library is then used to forecast how often SPHEREx, the all-sky near-infrared spectrophotometric survey, should recover the Paschen lines Pa$\alpha$, Pa$\beta$, and Pa$\gamma$. The authors conclude that Pa$\alpha$ flux is reliably measurable for 14 of the 192 modeled galaxies, with about a 50% success rate for galaxies whose H$\alpha$ flux exceeds roughly $4\times10^{-15}$ erg s$^{-1}$ cm$^{-2}$. If the forecast holds, infrared hydrogen lines can now carry dust and star-formation diagnostics into a wavelength regime where extinction is several times weaker than in the optical.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing identity is the attenuation mapping from observed to intrinsic hydrogen line ratios, $E(B-V) = -2.5\,/\,(\kappa(H_j)-\kappa(H_i))\times \log_{10}[ (H_i/H_j)_{\rm int}/(H_i/H_j)_{\rm obs}]$, combined with a power-law attenuation law $A(\lambda)=A_V(\lambda/\lambda_V)^{\delta}$ whose slope $\delta$ is fixed by requiring a single $E(B-V)$ to reproduce the H$\alpha$/H$\beta$ and H$\beta$/H$\gamma$ ratios simultaneously. These two pieces convert the compiled line fluxes into dust properties and reveal object-to-object variation in attenuation-curve shape. The second mechanism is the SPHEREx mock-observation pipeline: a single star-forming SED template scaled to each galaxy's W1 magnitude, Gaussian Paschen lines with Case B flux ratios to dust-corrected H$\alpha$, and the SPHEREx simple simulator, which smooths the SED to survey resolution, samples $4\times 96$ spectral channels with a small wavelength jitter, and adds photometric noise. Fitting each line with a Gaussian plus a linear continuum decides whether Pa$\alpha$, Pa$\beta$, or Pa$\gamma$ emerges from the noise, and the continuum-versus-line contrast set by these two mechanisms determines the reliable-detection counts.

What would settle it

Take the 22 sample galaxies with H$\alpha$ flux above $4\times10^{-15}$ erg s$^{-1}$ cm$^{-2}$, and check the SPHEREx spectra for a Pa$\alpha$ line at the redshifted rest wavelength. If fewer than about half show a significant line, the forecast of a roughly 50% reliable-detection rate at that flux threshold fails; if the continuum slopes measured from the same spectra depart systematically from the adopted template, the predicted line contrast and detection counts need revision.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that hydrogen-line diagnostics of low-redshift Ly$\alpha$ emitters can be pushed from the optical Balmer series into the near-infrared Paschen series, and that SPHEREx is capable of making that measurement for a significant fraction of the population. Using Case B recombination and the Calzetti attenuation curve, the authors convert observed H$\alpha$/H$\beta$ ratios into color excesses for 85 galaxies and infer Ly$\alpha$ escape fractions that anti-correlate with dust. For the 14 galaxies with H$\alpha$, H$\beta$, and H$\gamma$ all detected, they solve for the power-law slope $\delta$ of the attenuation curve that makes all three ratios agree, finding a wide spread in $\delta$ and $E(B-V)$ shifts of 10–50% relative to adopting a fixed Calzetti-like curve. Modeling the continuum with a single star-forming SED template scaled to each galaxy's catWISE W1 flux, adding Gaussian Pa$\alpha$, Pa$\beta$, and Pa$\gamma$ lines with Case B fluxes normalized by dust-corrected H$\alpha$ or Ly$\alpha$, and simulating SPHEREx observations with the survey's spectral resolution and expected noise, they find that Pa$\alpha$ flux can be measured to within about 0.3 dex for lines above roughly $2\times10^{-15}$ erg s$^{-1}$ cm$^{-2}$. This yields forecast reliable Pa$\alpha$ detections for 14 galaxies (six with Pa$\beta$, two with Pa$\gamma$), with a roughly 50% success rate for galaxies with H$\alpha$ flux near $4\times10^{-15}$ erg s$^{-1}$ cm$^{-2}$.

Load-bearing premise

The forecast assumes every galaxy's optical-to-near-infrared continuum has the same shape, represented by a single star-forming SED template scaled by the W1 magnitude, because only three of the 192 modeled galaxies have both 2MASS and catWISE photometry to constrain their individual continuum slopes.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

SPHEREx's all-sky spectra can be searched blindly for Pa$\alpha$-selected galaxies at $z\lesssim0.4$, adding a wavelength regime where dust attenuation is several times weaker than in the optical.
A practical target-selection rule follows: galaxies with H$\alpha$ flux above roughly $4\times10^{-15}$ erg s$^{-1}$ cm$^{-2}$ yield reliable Pa$\alpha$ measurements about half the time.
The spread in fitted attenuation slopes among the 14 three-line galaxies implies that fixing a single dust curve can bias $E(B-V)$ by 10–50%; multi-line measurements including Paschen lines will be needed for accurate star-formation rates.
Detected Pa$\alpha$ can be combined with H$\alpha$ to build a reddening-robust estimate of the ionizing photon production rate and, through the Ly$\alpha$ comparison, of the Ly$\alpha$ escape fraction.
The rarer Pa$\beta$ and Pa$\gamma$ detections, though few, anchor the attenuation-curve slope at near-infrared wavelengths rather than extrapolating it from the optical.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

If the 14-of-192 reliable-detection rate carries over to the wider GALEX-selected LAE population, the all-sky SPHEREx survey would yield hundreds of Pa$\alpha$-measured galaxies at $z<0.4$, turning a feasibility study into a statistical sample.
The single-template continuum assumption is directly testable as soon as SPHEREx data are in hand: comparing measured continuum slopes with the adopted template will show whether faint-line detection counts were over- or under-estimated.
Applying the same mock pipeline to Brackett-series lines would extend the forecast to heavily obscured systems like ULIRGs, where Balmer lines are nearly invisible and Pa$\alpha$/Br$\alpha$ ratios carry the dust signal.
The choice to fit the four repeated SPHEREx observations separately, rather than co-adding them, means the predicted detection counts depend on spectral resolution more than on depth; a co-added analysis would test the same science with higher signal-to-noise per channel.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

First, the punchline: this is a competent, workmanlike paper that delivers a useful compiled library and an explicitly provisional SPHEREx forecast. The genuinely new pieces are the 260-galaxy hydrogen-line compilation, the E(B-V) and Ly-alpha escape-fraction estimates for the 85 galaxies with Balmer detections, and the per-galaxy attenuation-slope fits for eight galaxies. The methods are textbook Case B + Calzetti, but the assembly is new and the paper is unusually upfront about its simplifications.

The Balmer-decrement analysis is done honestly. The negative-E(B-V) tail is discussed rather than hidden, and the slope analysis explicitly shows that six of the fourteen three-line galaxies land in a physically prohibited region and are excluded; it doesn't pretend they support the diversity claim. The SPHEREx modeling is also transparent: one Brown template, fixed line width, top-hat filters, and a clear statement in Section 5 that the counts are indicative.

Now the soft spot, and here the stress-test is right. The '14 reliable Pa-alpha detections' are defined by flux recovery within 0.3 dex with the line center fixed to the known redshift, not by a blind detection significance. The paper computes S_peak but never imposes a minimum. Figure 8's example galaxy ID 113 is labeled detectable with Pa-alpha S_peak = 1.78 and Pa-gamma S_peak = 0.00. In a blind survey like SPHEREx, those lines would not be found. The sensitivity tests vary templates, line widths, and filters but keep the same recovery criterion, so they don't address this. Adding a 5-sigma threshold would likely drop the 14 to a few, and the '50% success rate' at F_Halpha ~ 4e-15 would fall accordingly. The paper's own language in the abstract—'non-negligible fraction'—is defensible, but the quantified counts should be re-labeled as recovery-at-known-redshift yields, with the blind-detection yield as a separate, probably much smaller number.

The single Brown continuum template is a real but minor limitation, and the authors test it. The missing machine-readable table in the preprint is annoying but presumably will come with the journal material.

Citation pattern is fine. No circularity. This paper is for survey planners and people working on low-z LAE dust. It deserves a serious referee, and with the detection-significance issue addressed it can be published.

Referee Report

3 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper compiles 260 low-redshift (z ≲ 0.4) Lyα emitters from six literature samples and constructs a hydrogen recombination-line library. For 85 galaxies with at least two Balmer lines, the authors estimate E(B − V) from Case B ratios and a Calzetti attenuation curve, and derive Lyα escape fractions. For 14 galaxies with all three Balmer lines, they fit the attenuation-curve slope δ and report diversity in the inferred dust-law slope. The second half of the paper builds mock SPHEREx spectra for 192 galaxies with catWISE photometry, injects Paα, Paβ, and Paγ lines derived from extinction-corrected Hα or Lyα fluxes, and uses the SPHEREx simple simulator to assess line recovery. The central forecast is that Paα will be reliably measurable for 14 galaxies (≈7% of the modeled sample) and that a 50% success rate is reached for Hα fluxes near 4×10^(−15) erg s^(−1) cm^(−2). The paper explicitly acknowledges the inhomogeneous compilation and the simplified modeling assumptions.

Significance. If the forecast is robust, this is a useful early assessment of SPHEREx's ability to detect Paschen lines in low-redshift star-forming galaxies, and the compiled line library plus machine-readable table is a serviceable community resource. The paper's strengths include the clear separation of measured quantities from assumed Case B physics, the propagation of literature flux uncertainties into E(B − V) and fesc(Lyα), the explicit discussion of negative E(B − V) values as systematic indicators, and the sensitivity tests in Section 4.2. The main scientific claims, however, rest on a detectability metric that measures flux-recovery accuracy at known line centers rather than the significance with which a line would be found in a blind survey. Because SPHEREx will be a blind survey, the forecasted number of Paα detections and the quoted 50% success rate are likely overstated unless a detection-significance threshold is applied. The continuum-template and attenuation-slope robustness also need strengthening before the quantitative forecasts can be accepted.

major comments (3)

[§4.2 (Figs. 8 and 9)]
[§4.1 and §4.2 (continuum SED template)]
[§3.2 (Fig. 4, Eq. 4, Table A1)]

minor comments (3)

[§4.2 (Fig. 8 caption)]
[§4.1 (SPHEREx simulator setup)]
[Appendix A (Fig. A3)] Galaxy ID 33 in Figure A3 has a reduced χ² of 8.73, indicating a poor fit; this case should be discussed or excluded from the summary statistics to avoid giving the impression that all recovered line measurements are well behaved.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circular reasoning found: the Paschen detectability forecast is a forward injection-recovery test built from independent Balmer-line measurements, not a fit to its own outcome.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain is self-contained and non-circular. E(B-V) values are estimated from observed Balmer ratios through Equation (1) with Case B intrinsic ratios and the Calzetti curve, independent of any detectability claim. The Ly-alpha escape fraction is the ratio of observed Ly-alpha flux to the Case B-inferred intrinsic Ly-alpha flux, again a direct calculation from data rather than an assumed output. The attenuation-curve slope delta is solved for each of the 14 three-line galaxies via Equation (4), and the reported diversity is a description of that fit, not a prediction derived from the fit. The SPHEREx Paschen-line fluxes are forward-modeled from the extinction-corrected H-alpha or Ly-alpha fluxes using fixed Case B line ratios, and the mock spectra are generated with the SPHEREx simple simulator; the recovery test then compares fitted fluxes to the known injected fluxes, which is a standard sensitivity test rather than a circular fit. The reliability criterion (agreement within 0.3 dex) is applied to injected lines, so the quoted 14 Pa-alpha detections are a calibration result, not a prediction that has been tuned to match itself. No load-bearing self-citation, imported uniqueness theorem, or ansatz smuggled in via citation appears in the argument. Concerns about the low S/N of some recovered lines are accuracy or statistical-significance concerns, not circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on standard Case B recombination and the Calzetti law for the dust estimates, and on a single continuum template for the SPHEREx forecast. The per-galaxy δ values are genuine fits to the three Balmer ratios, while the 10% escape fraction and 400 km/s line width are hand-chosen inputs. No new physical entities are postulated.

free parameters (3)

Per-galaxy dust attenuation slope δ = -4.27, -3.44, -5.21, -0.82, and others for 8 galaxies
Fit to the three Balmer line ratios via Equation (4) for each of the 14 galaxies with Hα, Hβ, and Hγ; six galaxies fell in the physically prohibited δ > 0 region and were excluded.
Lyα escape fraction for Lyα-only galaxies = 0.10 (assumed)
A uniform fesc(Lyα) = 10% is adopted to convert Lyα flux into an intrinsic Hα estimate and then into Paschen fluxes when Hα is not available; the authors flag this as substantially uncertain.
Emission line width = 400 km/s
Fixed Gaussian width for Paschen lines in the mock SEDs, taken as typical for star-forming galaxies; the sensitivity tests vary this value.

assumptions (4)

domain assumption Case B recombination intrinsic line ratios apply to all galaxies: Hα/Hβ = 2.86, Hγ/Hβ = 0.469, Lyα/Hα = 8.7, Paα/Hα = 0.118.
Adopted at T = 10^4 K and ne = 100 cm^-3; the paper itself notes the negative E(B-V) tail may indicate departures from Case B for some galaxies.
domain assumption The Calzetti attenuation curve is applicable to low-redshift LAEs.
Used as the fiducial law for converting Balmer decrements to E(B-V); the authors test SMC and power-law alternatives and find a modest systematic dependence.
ad hoc to paper A single Brown SED template, selected from three galaxies with 2MASS and catWISE photometry, is representative of the continuum of all 192 galaxies in the SPHEREx forecast.
Section 4.1: the template is scaled to each galaxy's W1 magnitude, and the authors acknowledge that three galaxies are too few to capture the continuum diversity.
domain assumption The SPHEREx simple simulator reproduces the collaboration simulator and uses top-hat filter responses with 100% efficiency.
The authors cite Crill et al. (2025) for verification and state the mock SEDs are consistent with the collaboration simulator; the idealized filter response is used for simplicity.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Constructing a Hydrogen Line Library for Ly{\alpha} Emitters at Low Redshifts (z < 0.4): Estimating Dust Extinction and Assessing Paschen line Detectability with SPHEREx." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/4CLRJMK7

@misc{pith2026260808393,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Constructing a Hydrogen Line Library for Ly\alpha Emitters at Low Redshifts (z < 0.4): Estimating Dust Extinction and Assessing Paschen line Detectability with SPHEREx},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/4CLRJMK7}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2608.08393}
}

read the original abstract

Hydrogen recombination lines, one of the strongest emission lines from star-forming galaxies, are used to probe the early Universe as indicators of star formation rates and ionizing photon production rates. Ratios between different recombination lines provide clues to estimate dust attenuation, in addition to the H II region physical diagnostics. To prepare for future near-infrared spectral surveys and optical narrow-band imaging surveys aiming for hydrogen lines in different redshifts, we construct hydrogen recombination line libraries by compiling data from published literature. Our compilation includes 260 galaxies mostly at z < 0.4, of which at least one hydrogen recombination line is observed. The specific hydrogen emission lines under investigation encompass three Balmer lines (H{\alpha}, H\b{eta} and H{\gamma}) and Ly{\alpha} line. Of the compiled galaxies, we estimated dust extinction for 85 galaxies that have detections of at least two Balmer lines, by assuming the Case B recombination and Calzetti extinction curve, based on which Ly{\alpha} escape fraction is also inferred. For each of the 14 galaxies with detections of all three Balmer lines, we optimized the extinction curve so that it yields consistent E(B-V) values across the three possible Balmer line ratios, showing the variety in the slope of the dust attenuation curve. We further evaluated the feasibility of studying hydrogen emission line-selected galaxies with future spectral surveys such as SPHEREx by modeling the Paschen lines of our galaxy sample.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2608.08393 by the authors.

**Figure 1.** Distributions of redshift, Lyα flux (FLyα), and catWISE W1 magnitude for our sample galaxies. The empty histogram represents 260 galaxies with spectroscopic redshifts; the filled histogram is a subset of these, showing 192 galaxies that are cross-matched with the catWISE source catalog; and the hatched histogram represents the 72 catWISE-detected galaxies out of the 85 that have at least two Balmer emission line mea… view at source ↗

**Figure 2.** Hβ line flux versus Hα line flux for 92 galaxies with Hα and Hβ flux measurements with their uncertainties (85 with direct detections and 7 with Hβ upper limits). Data points with downward arrows denote the 7 galaxies with upper limit for the Hβ fluxes. E(B − V ) values can be derived from the observed Hα/Hβ flux ratio relative to its intrinsic ratio (the Balmer decrement; see the text and Equation (1)). The expect… view at source ↗

**Figure 4.** Hα/Hβ versus Hβ/Hγ flux ratios for the 14 galaxies with three Balmer line detections. Each ratio is normalized by its assumed intrinsic value (i.e., 2.86 for Hα/Hβ and 2.13 for Hβ/Hγ). The expected relation between the two ratios is shown for varying δ values, the slope of the attenuation curve (see Equation (4)). A Calzetti-like attenuation curve slope is δ = −1.0. Different δ values are required for individual ga… view at source ↗

Figures from the paper (4 more)

**Figure 6.** Figure 6: The observed wavelengths of hydrogen lines (solid lines in different colors) as a function of redshift, shown together with the SPHEREx wavelength coverage (gray shaded area) and the transmission curves of the 2MASS (J, H, and Ks) and catWISE (W1 and W2) photometric b…

**Figure 7.** Figure 7: An example mock SPHEREx spectrum around the observed wavelength range of the Paschen lines for this particular galaxy (W1 = 14.79 mag) at z = 0.102. The gray curve shows the modeled input spectrum to the SPHEREx simple simulator, the orange curve shows the spectrum smo…

**Figure 8.** Figure 8: Examples of galaxies for which all three Paschen lines are detectable with SPHEREx (Galaxy IDs 13 and 113). The gray and orange curves, and the red dots with error bars are the same as in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_8.png]

**Figure 9.** Figure 9: Measured line fluxes from the SPHEREx mock spectra compared to their corresponding true values for the Paα (left), Paβ (middle), and Paγ (right) lines. There are fewer dots in the right panel for Paγ, as the measurement failed for many galaxies (∼ 67%) due to its weak …

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

53 extracted references · 36 canonical work pages

[1]

2014, A&A, 561, A89

Atek, H., Kunth, D., Schaerer, D., et al. 2014, A&A, 561, A89

work page 2014
[2]

Brown, M. J. I., Moustakas, J., Smith, J. D. T., et al. 2014, ApJS, 212, 18

2014
[3]

Brown, M. J. I., Moustakas, J., Kennicutt, R. C., et al. 2017, ApJ, 847, 136

2017
[4]

2021, ApJ, 918, 82 Calabrò, A., Pentericci, L., Talia, M., et al

Byun, W., Sheen, Y .-K., Seon, K.-I., et al. 2021, ApJ, 918, 82 Calabrò, A., Pentericci, L., Talia, M., et al. 2022, A&A, 667, A117

work page 2021
[5]

C., et al

Calzetti, D., Armus, L., Bohlin, R. C., et al. 2000, ApJ, 533, 682

2000
[6]

L., & Storchi-Bergmann, T

Calzetti, D., Kinney, A. L., & Storchi-Bergmann, T. 1994, ApJ, 429, 582

1994
[7]

M., Scoville, N

Casey, C. M., Scoville, N. Z., Sanders, D. B., et al. 2014, ApJ, 796, 95

2014
[8]

2020, MNRAS, 499, 5241

Cheng, C., Ibar, E., Smail, I., et al. 2020, MNRAS, 499, 5241

work page 2020

Show all 53 references

[9]

2022, in American Astronomical Society Meeting Abstracts, Vol

Cleri, N., & Papovich, C. 2022, in American Astronomical Society Meeting Abstracts, Vol. 54, American Astronomical Society Meet- ing Abstracts, 241.31

2022
[10]

J., Trump, J

Cleri, N. J., Trump, J. R., Backhaus, B. E., et al. 2022, ApJ, 929, 3

2022
[11]

K., Best, P

Cochrane, R. K., Best, P . N., Sobral, D., et al. 2017, MNRAS, 469, 2913

2017
[12]

L., Barger, A

Cowie, L. L., Barger, A. J., & Hu, E. M. 2010, ApJ, 711, 928

2010
[13]

L., Barger, A

Cowie, L. L., Barger, A. J., & Hu, E. M. 2011, ApJ, 738, 136

2011
[14]

P ., Werner, M., Akeson, R., et al

Crill, B. P ., Werner, M., Akeson, R., et al. 2020, in Society of Photo- Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, Vol. 11443, Space Telescopes and Instrumentation 2020: Optical, In- frared, and Millimeter Wave, ed. M. Lystrup & M. D. Perrin, 114430I, doi: 10...

2020 doi
[15]

P ., Bach, Y

Crill, B. P ., Bach, Y . P ., Bryan, S. A., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2505.24856

2025
[16]

A., et al

Deharveng, J.-M., Small, T., Barlow, T. A., et al. 2008, ApJ, 680, 1072

2008
[17]

L., Cohen, S

Finkelstein, S. L., Cohen, S. H., Moustakas, J., et al. 2011, ApJ, 733, 117

2011
[18]

M., et al

Guo, Y ., Rafelski, M., Faber, S. M., et al. 2016, ApJ, 833, 37

2016
[19]

2023, A&A, 674, A99

Hamed, M., Małek, K., Buat, V ., et al. 2023, A&A, 674, A99

2023
[20]

N., Smail, I., & Kodama, T

Hayashi, M., Sobral, D., Best, P . N., Smail, I., & Kodama, T. 2013, MNRAS, 430, 1042

2013
[21]

C., Wisotzki, L., Saust, R., et al

Herenz, E. C., Wisotzki, L., Saust, R., et al. 2019, A&A, 621, A107

2019
[22]

2010, ApJ, 721, 1233 Ivezić, Ž., Ivezić, V ., Moeyens, J., et al

Imanishi, M., Nakagawa, T., Shirahata, M., Ohyama, Y ., & Onaka, T. 2010, ApJ, 721, 1233 Ivezić, Ž., Ivezić, V ., Moeyens, J., et al. 2022, Icarus, 371, 114696

2010
[23]

2023, A&A, 670, A125

Ji, X., Y an, R., Bundy, K., et al. 2023, A&A, 670, A125

2023
[24]

1998, in ESA Special Publication, Vol

Kennicutt, R. 1998, in ESA Special Publication, Vol. 429, LIA Col- loq. 34: The Next Generation Space Telescope: Science Drivers and Technological Challenges, ed. B. Kaldeich-Schürmann, 81, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.astro-ph/9807188

1998 doi arXiv
[25]

C., & Evans, N

Kennicutt, R. C., & Evans, N. J. 2012, ARA&A, 50, 531

2012
[26]

A., Malhotra, S., Rhoads, J

Khostovan, A. A., Malhotra, S., Rhoads, J. E., et al. 2024, arXiv e- prints, arXiv:2408.00080

2024 arXiv
[27]

2018, A&A, 610, A31

Kim, D., & Im, M. 2018, A&A, 610, A31

2018
[28]

2010, ApJ, 724, 386

Kim, D., Im, M., & Kim, M. 2010, ApJ, 724, 386

2010
[29]

2023, ApJ, 954, 156

Kim, D., Im, M., Kim, M., et al. 2023, ApJ, 954, 156

2023
[30]

2018, ApJS, 238, 37

Kim, D., Im, M., Canalizo, G., et al. 2018, ApJS, 238, 37

2018
[31]

2024, ApJ, 962, 36

Lee, K.-S., Gawiser, E., Park, C., et al. 2024, ApJ, 962, 36

2024
[32]

2024, A&A, 691, A201 Mentuch Cooper, E., Gebhardt, K., Davis, D., et al

Lin, Z., & Y an, R. 2024, A&A, 691, A201 Mentuch Cooper, E., Gebhardt, K., Davis, D., et al. 2023, ApJ, 943, 177

2024
[33]

R., Heckman, T

Meurer, G. R., Heckman, T. M., & Calzetti, D. 1999, in American Institute of Physics Conference Series, Vol. 470, After the Dark Ages: When Galaxies were Y oung (the Universe at 2 < Z < 5), ed. S. Holt & E. Smith, 359–363, doi: 10.1063/1.58622

1999 doi
[34]

E., & Ferland, G

Osterbrock, D. E., & Ferland, G. J. 2006, Astrophysics of gaseous nebulae and active galactic nuclei Östlin, G., Hayes, M., Duval, F., et al. 2014, ApJ, 797, 11

2006
[35]

2008, ApJS, 176, 301

Ouchi, M., Shimasaku, K., Akiyama, M., et al. 2008, ApJS, 176, 301

2008
[36]

2018, PASJ, 70, S13

Ouchi, M., Harikane, Y ., Shibuya, T., et al. 2018, PASJ, 70, S13

2018
[37]

Pastrav, B. A. 2023, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical So- ciety, 527, 11167

2023
[38]

V ., Inami, H., Malkan, M

Payne, A. V ., Inami, H., Malkan, M. A., Matsuhara, H., & Sakai, S. 2018, in The Cosmic Wheel and the Legacy of the AKARI Archive: From Galaxies and Stars to Planets and Life, ed. T. Oot- subo, I. Y amamura, K. Murata, & T. Onaka, 337–340

2018
[39]

E., Steidel, C

Pettini, M., Shapley, A. E., Steidel, C. C., et al. 2001, ApJ, 554, 981 Planck Collaboration, Aghanim, N., Akrami, Y ., et al. 2020, A&A, 641, A6

2001
[40]

2022, ApJ, 928, 71

Papovich, C. 2022, ApJ, 928, 71

2022
[41]

2023, ApJ, 948, 83

Brammer, G. 2023, ApJ, 948, 83

2023
[42]

2020, in XIV .0 Scientific Meeting (virtual) of the Spanish Astronomical Society, 182

Rodrigo, C., & Solano, E. 2020, in XIV .0 Scientific Meeting (virtual) of the Spanish Astronomical Society, 182

2020
[43]

2012, SVO Filter Profile Service Version 1.0, IVOA Working Draft 15 October 2012, doi:10.5479/ ADS/bib/2012ivoa.rept.1015R

Rodrigo, C., Solano, E., & Bayo, A. 2012, SVO Filter Profile Service Version 1.0, IVOA Working Draft 15 October 2012, doi:10.5479/ ADS/bib/2012ivoa.rept.1015R

2012
[44]

F., et al

Rodrigo, C., Cruz, P ., Aguilar, J. F., et al. 2024, A&A, 689, A93

2024
[45]

2020, ARA&A, 58, 529

Salim, S., & Narayanan, D. 2020, ARA&A, 58, 529

2020
[46]

2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2404.09015

Scarlata, C., Hayes, M., Panagia, N., et al. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2404.09015

2024 arXiv
[47]

I., et al

Scarlata, C., Colbert, J., Teplitz, H. I., et al. 2009, ApJ, 704, L98

2009
[48]

E., Zakamska, N

Sun, A.-L., Greene, J. E., Zakamska, N. L., et al. 2018, Monthly No- tices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 480, 2302

2018
[49]

T., Yuan, F.-T., Ikeyama, A., Murata, K

Takeuchi, T. T., Yuan, F.-T., Ikeyama, A., Murata, K. L., & Inoue, A. K. 2012, ApJ, 755, 144

2012
[50]

E., Franx, M., Leja, J., et al

Whitaker, K. E., Franx, M., Leja, J., et al. 2014, ApJ, 795, 104

2014
[51]

T., Förster Schreiber, N

Wisnioski, E., Mendel, J. T., Förster Schreiber, N. M., et al. 2018, ApJ, 855, 97

2018
[52]

Wold, I. G. B., Finkelstein, S. L., Barger, A. J., Cowie, L. L., & Rosen- wasser, B. 2017, ApJ, 848, 108

2017
[53]

M., van der Wel, A., et al

Wuyts, S., Förster Schreiber, N. M., van der Wel, A., et al. 2011, ApJ, 742, 96 Y ano, K., Baba, S., Nakagawa, T., et al. 2021, ApJ, 922, 272 Song et al. 13 Constructing a Hydrogen Line Library for Lyα Emitters at Low Redshifts 1.80 1.85 1.90 1.95 2.00 2.05 λ [ µ m] 0.0 0.2 0....

2011

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [1]

2014, A&A, 561, A89

Atek, H., Kunth, D., Schaerer, D., et al. 2014, A&A, 561, A89

work page 2014

[2] [2]

Brown, M. J. I., Moustakas, J., Smith, J. D. T., et al. 2014, ApJS, 212, 18

2014

[3] [3]

Brown, M. J. I., Moustakas, J., Kennicutt, R. C., et al. 2017, ApJ, 847, 136

2017

[4] [4]

2021, ApJ, 918, 82 Calabrò, A., Pentericci, L., Talia, M., et al

Byun, W., Sheen, Y .-K., Seon, K.-I., et al. 2021, ApJ, 918, 82 Calabrò, A., Pentericci, L., Talia, M., et al. 2022, A&A, 667, A117

work page 2021

[5] [5]

C., et al

Calzetti, D., Armus, L., Bohlin, R. C., et al. 2000, ApJ, 533, 682

2000

[6] [6]

L., & Storchi-Bergmann, T

Calzetti, D., Kinney, A. L., & Storchi-Bergmann, T. 1994, ApJ, 429, 582

1994

[7] [7]

M., Scoville, N

Casey, C. M., Scoville, N. Z., Sanders, D. B., et al. 2014, ApJ, 796, 95

2014

[8] [8]

2020, MNRAS, 499, 5241

Cheng, C., Ibar, E., Smail, I., et al. 2020, MNRAS, 499, 5241

work page 2020