Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 50 references

Sasaki with torsion manifolds and string backgrounds

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper classifies compact five-dimensional ∇-Einstein Sasaki-with-torsion manifolds into four explicit local classes.

desk verdict A solid transfer of the Bismut program to Sasaki-with-torsion geometry, with a genuine 5-dimensional classification that currently rests on an unproved preprint lemma from [35]. read the letter →

arxiv 2608.08781 v1 pith:HJIW2FQX submitted 2026-08-09 math.DG

Beatrice Brienza , Anna Fino , Udhav Fowdar , Gueo Grantcharov This is my paper · ORCID
classification math.DG MSC 53C1553C2553C2953C55
keywords Sasakiwithtorsion∇-EinsteinmanifoldsBismutconnectionco-Kähler-likegeometricflowsgeneralizedRicciflowalmostcontactmetricstructuresstringbackgrounds
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper studies Sasaki manifolds with torsion—the odd-dimensional counterpart of Hermitian manifolds with a Bismut connection—and asks what the analogue of the Bismut–Hermite–Einstein condition is. It introduces $\nabla$-Einstein Sasaki-with-torsion manifolds, defined by vanishing of the $\varphi$-Ricci form and closed torsion, and proves that in compact dimension five these manifolds fall into exactly four explicit local classes. Two classes are flat, one is a mapping torus over a compact Kähler Ricci-flat 4-manifold, and the remaining class consists of local $S^1$-bundles over Kähler surfaces whose strictly positive non-constant scalar curvature solves the Box equation $\square \tilde{s}^T = (\tilde{s}^T)^2/2 - |\widetilde{\mathrm{Ric}}|^2$. Because such structures are exactly the odd-dimensional string backgrounds in dimension five, the classification provides a concrete catalogue of compact five-dimensional string backgrounds. The paper also introduces a geometric flow for Sasaki-with-torsion structures, proves short-time existence and preservation of the strong (closed torsion) condition, and shows the flow is gauge-equivalent to generalized Ricci flow.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the $\nabla$-parallel vector field $V=\theta^\sharp-\operatorname{grad} f$, where $\theta$ is the Lee form of the transverse Hermitian structure; on compact $\nabla$-Einstein manifolds its existence is imported from a recent preprint. Proposition 5.2 turns the $\nabla$-Einstein condition $\rho^\nabla=0$ into the algebraic system $c\, d\eta=\rho^B$ with $c$ constant and $dH=0$, so the transverse geometry is constrained by the Bismut Ricci form of the base. Conformally rescaling the transverse metric by $e^{-f}$ makes the base Kähler and forces its scalar curvature to obey the Box equation. The flat cases are controlled by Theorem 4.7, which identifies $\nabla$-flat Sasaki-with-torsion manifolds, up to finite cover, with quotients $G/\mathbb{Z}^k$ of simply connected odd-dimensional Lie groups carrying bi-invariant metrics and left-invariant normal almost contact structures. For the flow, the machinery is the decomposition of infinitesimal deformations of a $U(n)'$-structure into irreducible modules, which selects the evolution equations for $\eta$ and $g^T$ and yields the gauge equivalence with generalized Ricci flow.

What would settle it

Look for a compact five-dimensional $\nabla$-Einstein Sasaki-with-torsion manifold whose universal cover is not one of the four models in Theorem 5.16—for instance, a compact example with $V\neq 0$ but non-flat $\nabla$, or a $V=0$, $c\neq 0$, $f$ non-constant example whose transverse Kähler scalar curvature is constant or fails $\square \tilde{s}^T = (\tilde{s}^T)^2/2 - |\widetilde{\mathrm{Ric}}|^2$. Since the theorem is conditional, the sharpest test is to disprove the imported lemma: exhibit a compact $\nabla$-Einstein Sasaki-with-torsion manifold on which no normalized $f$ makes $\theta^\sharp-\operatorname{grad} f$ parallel.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is Theorem 5.16: every compact five-dimensional $\nabla$-Einstein Sasaki-with-torsion manifold belongs to exactly one of four classes. If $V=\theta^\sharp-\operatorname{grad} f\neq 0$, the connection $\nabla$ is flat and the universal cover is isometric to $\mathbb{R}\times(\mathbb{R}\times SU(2))$. If $V=0$ and $c=0$, the manifold is a mapping torus over a compact Kähler Ricci-flat 4-manifold. If $V=0$ and $c\neq 0$ with $f$ constant, $\nabla$ is flat and the universal cover is $SU(2)\times\mathbb{C}$ with the standard left-invariant Sasaki structure on $SU(2)$. If $V=0$ and $c\neq 0$ with $f$ non-constant, $\nabla$ is non-flat and the manifold is locally an $S^1$-bundle over a 4-dimensional Kähler manifold whose strictly positive non-constant scalar curvature satisfies $\square \tilde{s}^T = (\tilde{s}^T)^2/2 - |\widetilde{\mathrm{Ric}}|^2$; this transverse geometry is exactly the one found on six-dimensional Bismut–Hermite–Einstein manifolds.

Load-bearing premise

The classification rests on an imported lemma, quoted from a recent preprint, that every compact $\nabla$-Einstein Sasaki-with-torsion manifold admits a unique normalized smooth function $f$ for which $V=\theta^\sharp-\operatorname{grad} f$ is $\nabla$-parallel; the $V\neq 0$ versus $V=0$ split and the four-case structure of Theorem 5.16 depend on it, and the $f$-constant subcase further imports a splitting result from another paper.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Every compact $\nabla$-Einstein Sasaki-with-torsion 5-manifold is now locally known: the four cases of Theorem 5.16 give the complete set of universal covers and fibrations.
  • The only non-flat compact case has a Kähler surface base with strictly positive non-constant scalar curvature solving the Box equation, and the orthotoric orbifold family $S_{a,b,c}$ yields explicit examples $L_{a,b,c}$ with $c=2$.
  • $\nabla$-flat Sasaki-with-torsion manifolds are, up to finite cover, quotients $G/\mathbb{Z}^k$ of simply connected odd-dimensional Lie groups with bi-invariant metric and left-invariant normal almost contact structure.
  • In dimension 7, compact $\nabla$-Einstein manifolds with $V\neq 0$ have a local $\mathbb{R}^3$-bundle structure over a 4-dimensional Hermitian base, and when $c=0$ the torsion satisfies a generalized Box equation (5.35); trivial bundle constructions give new examples.
  • The strong Sasaki-with-torsion flow exists uniquely for short time, preserves the strong condition, is gauge-equivalent to generalized Ricci flow, and has every $\nabla$-Einstein structure as a stationary point.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same $V$-dichotomy is likely to organize compact $\nabla$-Einstein Sasaki-with-torsion manifolds in all odd dimensions: the 7-dimensional analysis already shows $V\neq 0$ forces an $\mathbb{R}^3$-bundle over a 4-dimensional Hermitian base, suggesting a hierarchy of Box-type equations indexed by the number of parallel directions.
  • Because the strong Sasaki-with-torsion flow is gauge-equivalent to generalized Ricci flow, established long-time and singularity results for the latter could transfer to this setting, turning the static classification into a dynamical existence proof for $\nabla$-Einstein structures.
  • The non-flat 5-dimensional transverse geometry coincides with the transverse geometry of 6-dimensional Bismut–Hermite–Einstein manifolds, so the classification points to a fibration correspondence: unit $S^1$-bundles over such 6-manifolds should produce 5-dimensional $\nabla$-Einstein manifolds, and the paper's examples realize the forward direction.
  • A testable extension is to run the strong Sasaki-with-torsion flow on the explicit non-compact examples (Examples 5.7 and 5.8) and check whether the Box equation emerges as a scalar constraint; convergence of the flow would give a dynamical construction of $\nabla$-Einstein structures.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript studies Sasaki-with-torsion (SWT) structures, the odd-dimensional counterparts of Hermitian manifolds with torsion, with the Friedrich–Ivanov connection ∇. It proves Theorem 3.3: a SWT structure is co-Kähler-like (∇ satisfies the first Bianchi identity) if and only if the torsion H is closed and parallel. Theorem 4.7 characterizes ∇-flat SWT manifolds, up to finite cover, as quotients of simply connected odd-dimensional Lie groups with left-invariant bi-invariant structures. The central geometric object is the ∇-Einstein condition (strong SWT plus ρ∇=0), introduced as an analogue of Bismut Hermite-Einstein; Examples 5.7 and 5.8 give non-compact examples in dimensions 5 and 7. Theorem 5.16 classifies compact 5-dimensional ∇-Einstein manifolds into four cases according to the behaviour of V=θ♯−grad f, where the existence of this ∇-parallel vector field is imported from the preprint [35]. Section 5.2 sketches the 7-dimensional case. Section 6 develops a general U(n)′-flow framework, introduces the strong SWT flow (6.44)–(6.45), proves short-time existence, preservation of the strong condition, and gauge equivalence to generalized Ricci flow.

Significance. The paper is valuable both for the classification and for the flow theory. If Theorem 5.16 is fully supported, it gives a complete structural description of compact 5-dimensional ∇-Einstein SWT manifolds, and the appearance of the Box equation (5.32) links the geometry to the 6-dimensional Bismut Hermite-Einstein theory of [6] and to explicit physics examples such as the orthotoric family L_{a,b,c}. The flow part is novel, and Proposition 6.8 derives the gauge equivalence to generalized Ricci flow rather than assuming it; the preservation of the strong condition via a linear transversely parabolic equation for Ψ=dH is a clean argument. Most of the local computations (Theorem 3.3, Theorem 4.7, the examples, and the algebra in Proposition 6.8) are explicit and checkable. The main weakness is that the compact classification depends on external inputs, primarily the recent preprint [35], whose exact hypotheses are not reproduced in the manuscript.

major comments (4)
  1. [§5.1, paragraph before Proposition 5.9] The dichotomy in Theorem 5.16 is driven entirely by the existence and uniqueness of a ∇-parallel vector field V=θ♯−grad f, attributed to the recent preprint [35] in the unnumbered paragraph preceding Proposition 5.9. The manuscript neither proves this statement nor states its precise hypotheses: the normalization of f, the compactness hypotheses, and whether V∈F⊥ξ is part of the conclusion are not specified. Proposition 5.9 uses V∈F⊥ξ and the parallelism of V and φV to conclude that the only nonzero curvature component is R∇(X,Y)(α,φα), which then vanishes by ρ∇=0, and every case with V=0 uses θ=df. If [35] in fact requires an additional hypothesis, such as a normalization condition on the generalized Ricci soliton or a nonvanishing assumption on V, the four cases of Theorem 5.16 need not be exhaustive. Please include a proof or a precise statement of the imported lemma and verify that it applies verbatim to the ∇-Einstein SWT manifolds defined in Definition 5.5.
  2. [§5.1, proof of Theorem 5.16, case (b)(i)] This branch invokes the splitting argument of Corollary 1.2 of [6] via a "transverse version of Theorem 1 in [7]" after asserting that the transverse Ricci tensor of the Kähler metric has two distinct non-negative constant eigenvalues, one of which is zero. The imported result is load-bearing: it is what upgrades the parallelism of K to a global Riemannian splitting and ultimately forces N³≅SU(2). The precise statement of the transverse splitting theorem, its hypotheses (compactness, eigenvalue assumptions, the meaning of "transverse version") and the verification of those hypotheses in the present setting are not given. Please state and prove the splitting lemma in the present notation, or give a reference whose hypotheses match this situation exactly.
  3. [§5.2, equations (5.33)–(5.35)] The 7-dimensional analysis is presented as a sequence of claims importing [35, Theorem 5.6] and a "generalization of Theorem 5.2 to local R^{2k+1}-bundles", and the footnote to (5.34) acknowledges a sign and normalization discrepancy in the constants c_μ and c_ν. As written, equations (5.33), (5.34), and the generalized Box equation (5.35) cannot be verified from the manuscript, and the discrepancy is left unresolved. Since the section is presented as the paper's treatment of compact ∇-Einstein manifolds in dimension 7, please supply the missing derivation and fix the conventions, or explicitly mark the section as provisional.
  4. [§6.2, Theorem 6.5] The short-time existence and uniqueness statement for the strong SWT flow is not proved in detail. After equation (6.46) the text asserts that the gauge-fixed system is transversely parabolic and that the DeTurck trick or the results in [9] apply, but the explicit gauge-fixing vector field and the principal symbol computation are not written down. Given that Theorem 6.5 is a main analytic result of the flow section, please provide the explicit gauge-fixed system or a precise reduction to [9] so that parabolicity and uniqueness are checkable from the paper.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Introduction, Theorem 1.2] The Box equation in Theorem 1.2 is printed as "2˜sT = (˜sT)²/2 − |gRic|²", whereas equation (5.32) gives "□˜sT = (˜sT)²/2 − |˜Ric|²"; the missing □ and the spurious factor 2 should be corrected.
  2. [Table of contents and Section 5 heading] The heading "∇-Hemite Einstein manifolds" contains a typo; it should read "∇-Hermite-Einstein manifolds".
  3. [Proof of Theorem 5.12, first sentence] The proof begins with "By Theorem 5.2, the ∇-Hermite–Einstein condition is equivalent to...", but the statement used is Proposition 5.2; the cross-reference should be corrected.
  4. [Section 4, paragraph before Theorem 4.7] The name "Friderich-Ivanov connection" is misspelled; it should be "Friedrich–Ivanov connection".
  5. [Throughout, Definition 5.5 vs. Introduction] The terminology is not uniform: Definition 5.5 uses "∇-Einstein", while the introduction and Theorem 5.16 use "∇-Hermite–Einstein". A sentence identifying the two terms would avoid confusion.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circular dependency: the central classification rests on an external lemma that is not proved here, and the flow gauge-equivalence is derived rather than imposed.

full rationale

The central classification (Theorem 5.16) is not circular: the split on V = θ♯ − grad f is imported from the external preprint [35] and is not proved in the paper, but an unproved external lemma is a completeness or correctness concern, not a circular reduction. The paper does not define ∇-Einstein in terms of the classification, fits no parameter, and does not rename a known result as a new one. The V≠0 flatness (Proposition 5.9) and the V=0 cases follow from curvature identities and the imported parallel vector field; the transverse Box equation (5.32) is derived from c dη = ρB and dH = 0, not assumed. Similarly, the strong Sasaki-with-torsion flow is defined by (6.44)–(6.45), and its preservation of the strong condition (Proposition 6.6) and gauge equivalence to generalized Ricci flow (Proposition 6.8) are proved using the flow equations and curvature identities, not built into the definitions. The self-citations present ([30] in Example 5.8 and [20] in the flow framework) support auxiliary constructions or analytic strategy; neither feeds the classification or the flow equivalence by construction, so they do not raise the circularity score. If the [35] lemma fails or requires additional hypotheses, Theorem 5.16 would be unsupported, but that is an external-support risk rather than evidence that the derivation is equivalent to its own inputs.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 10 assumptions · 2 invented entities

The central claims rest on the standard Friedrich-Ivanov connection theory, several classical theorems (Pittie, Milnor, DeTurck), and two recent external results: the Kennon-Streets parallel vector field V for compact ∇-Einstein manifolds, and the Zhao-Zheng curvature characterization of parallel Bismut torsion. The free parameters listed are construction choices in the examples, not fitted values. No new physical entities are postulated beyond two new mathematical definitions.

free parameters (2)
  • c (transverse trace constant) = ±√2
    In Remark 5.3, c is chosen to satisfy c²=2 so that the S^1-bundle curvature dη=(c/2)ω is integral and so that ρ^∇=ω−(c²/2)ω vanishes; the choice is made by hand to construct the examples.
  • k (domain scale) = k>0
    In Examples 5.7 and 5.8, k defines the metric u=k−(|x|²+|y|²) on a ball; the ∇-Einstein property holds for any k>0, so this is a domain parameter rather than a fitted value.
assumptions (10)
  • domain assumption Friedrich-Ivanov connection ∇ exists and is unique for normal almost contact metric manifolds with Killing Reeb vector field, with torsion H=η∧dη+d^φF (Theorem 2.6 from [23,24]).
    This is the foundational object of the paper; every subsequent claim about ∇ presupposes it.
  • domain assumption In dimension 5, total skew-symmetry of the Nijenhuis tensor is equivalent to its vanishing (from [16]).
    Used to justify imposing normality without loss of generality in 5 dimensions (Introduction and Remark 5.17).
  • standard math Bianchi identities for metric connections with skew torsion: Theorem 3.4 from [34] and Lemma 3.5 from [31].
    Central to the proof of Theorem 3.3 (co-Kähler-like characterization).
  • standard math Curvature characterization of Hermitian manifolds with parallel Bismut torsion, equations (3.18)-(3.21) from [50] (Zhao-Zheng).
    Used in Steps 4-6 of the proof of Theorem 3.3; [50] is a 2024 arXiv preprint.
  • standard math Pittie's theorem: any left-invariant complex structure on a compact Lie group is a Samelson complex structure (from [40]).
    Basis for Theorem 4.3, which classifies left-invariant normal almost contact structures on compact Lie groups and feeds into Theorem 4.7.
  • standard math Milnor's splitting for simply connected Lie groups with bi-invariant metrics, (G,b)=(G'×R^k, b'+g_E) (from [37]).
    Used in Theorem 4.7 and Remark 4.6.
  • ad hoc to paper For compact ∇-Einstein Sasaki-with-torsion manifolds there exists a unique normalized f such that V=θ^♯−gradf is ∇-parallel (from [35], with [33] and [26]).
    This is the key structural input for the compact 5-dimensional classification (Section 5.1, before Proposition 5.9). [35] is a recent preprint by Kennon and Streets; if false, the classification's case split collapses.
  • standard math Kähler splitting criterion for Kähler metrics whose Ricci tensor has non-negative constant eigenvalues with one zero eigenvalue (Corollary 1.2 in [6], based on [7]).
    Applied in the proof of Theorem 5.16 case (b)(i) to conclude the transverse structure splits off a flat factor.
  • standard math Balanced Hermitian surfaces are Kähler (used when V=0 in dimension 4).
    Used to conclude that the transverse geometry is conformally Kähler in Theorem 5.12 and the V=0 case of Theorem 5.16.
  • standard math DeTurck/parabolic-flow existence for transverse parabolic systems, from [9] and [20].
    Basis for the short-time existence and uniqueness of the strong Sasaki-with-torsion flow (Theorem 6.5).
invented entities (2)
  • ∇-Einstein (∇-Hermite-Einstein) manifold
    purpose: Odd-dimensional analogue of the Bismut-Hermite-Einstein condition, defined by ρ^∇=0 together with dH=0; it organizes the compact classification and the stationary points of the new flow.
    The entity is a new definition introduced in this paper. Its only evidence is internal: the examples constructed here and the classification derived here. No external falsifiable handle is provided beyond the mathematical consequences proved in the paper.
  • Strong Sasaki-with-torsion flow
    purpose: A geometric flow on almost contact metric structures that preserves normality and, on the strong locus, the closure dH=0; it is claimed to be gauge-equivalent to generalized Ricci flow.
    A new evolution equation (6.44)-(6.45). Its main external connection is the existing generalized Ricci flow theory, but the flow itself is new and its well-posedness is argued within the paper.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Sasaki with torsion manifolds and string backgrounds." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/HJIW2FQX

@misc{pith2026260808781,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Sasaki with torsion manifolds and string backgrounds},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/HJIW2FQX}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2608.08781}
}
abstract

Motivated by the analogy with the Bismut connection in Hermitian geometry, we study Sasaki with torsion manifolds. In particular, we characterize co-K\"ahler-like and flat Sasaki with torsion manifolds, and we introduce the notion of a $\nabla$-Einstein manifold as the odd-dimensional analogue of the Bismut Hermite-Einstein condition. We provide non-compact examples and we study compact $\nabla$-Einstein manifold in dimension $5$ and $7$. We also develop a general framework for geometric flows of almost contact metric structures. In particular, we derive a flow for Sasaki with torsion structures that preserves the strong condition, that is, the closure of the torsion. Furthermore we prove that such flow is gauge-equivalent to the generalized Ricci flow.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

50 extracted references · 49 canonical work pages

  1. [35]

    The canonical symmetry reduction of string backgrounds

    A. Kennon and J. Streets. The canonical symmetry reduction of string backgrounds. arXiv preprint 2511.20773, 2025. (Cited on pages 2, 22, 27, and 28)

    work page Pith review arXiv 2025

  2. [6]

    Apostolov, G

    V. Apostolov, G. Barbaro, K.H. Lee, and J. Streets. Rigidity results for non–Kähler Calabi–Yau geometries on threefolds.Math. Ann., 2023(393):3609–3637, 2025. (Cited on pages 3, 24, and 26)

    work page 2023

  3. [20]

    Flows of geometric structures II

    D. Fadel, U. Fowdar, E. Loubeau, A. J. Moreno, and H. N. Sá Earp. Flows of geometric structures II.arXiv:2607.23231, 2026. (Cited on pages 30, 31, and 35)

    work page Pith review arXiv 2026

  4. [9]

    Bedulli, W

    L. Bedulli, W. He, and L. Vezzoni. Second-order geometric flows on foliated manifolds.J. Geom. Anal., 28(1):697–725, 2018. (Cited on page 35)

    work page 2018

  5. [7]

    Apostolov, T

    V. Apostolov, T. Draghici, and A. Moroianu. A splitting theorem for Kähler manifolds whose Ricci tensors have constant eigenvalues.Internat. J. Math., 12(7):769–789, 2001. (Cited on page 26)

    work page 2001

  6. [1]

    Agricola

    I. Agricola. The Srní lectures on non-integrable geometries with torsion.Arch. Math. (Brno), 42(5):5–84, 2006. (Cited on page 1)

    work page 2006

  7. [2]

    Agricola, A

    I. Agricola, A. C. Ferreira, and T. Friedrich. The classification of naturally reductive homogeneous spaces in dimensionsn≤6.Differential Geom. Appl., 39:59–92, 2015. (Cited on page 8)

    work page 2015

  8. [3]

    Agricola and T

    I. Agricola and T. Friedrich. A note on flat metric connections with antisymmetric torsion.Differ- ential Geom. Appl., 28(4):480–487, 2010. (Cited on page 15)

    work page 2010

Show all 50 references
  1. [4]

    Angella, A

    D. Angella, A. Otal, L. Ugarte, and R. Villacampa. On Gauduchon connections with Kähler-like curvature.Comm. Anal. Geom., 30(5):961–1006, 2022. (Cited on pages 2 and 8)

    2022

  2. [5]

    Apostolov

    V. Apostolov. Private communication. (Cited on page 2)

  3. [8]

    Pluriclosed3-foldswithvanishingBismutRicciform: general theory in the quasi-regular case

    V.Apostolov, A.Ladhili, andK.H.Lee. Pluriclosed3-foldswithvanishingBismutRicciform: general theory in the quasi-regular case. arXiv preprint 2601.04937, 2026. (Cited on pages 25 and 29)

    2026

  4. [10]

    A. L. Besse.Einstein manifolds. Classics in Mathematics. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2008. Reprint of the 1987 edition. (Cited on page 32)

    2008

  5. [11]

    D. E. Blair.Riemannian geometry of contact and symplectic manifolds, volume 203 ofProgress in Mathematics. Birkhäuser Boston, Ltd., Boston, MA, second edition, 2010. (Cited on pages 4, 5, and 29)

    2010

  6. [12]

    OxfordMathematicalMonographs.OxfordUniversity Press, Oxford, 2008

    C.P.BoyerandK.Galicki.Sasakian geometry. OxfordMathematicalMonographs.OxfordUniversity Press, Oxford, 2008. (Cited on pages 4, 5, and 17)

    2008

  7. [13]

    C. P. Boyer, K. Galicki, and P. Matzeu. On eta-Einstein Sasakian geometry.Comm. Math. Phys., 262(1):177–208, 2006. (Cited on page 7)

    2006

  8. [14]

    Cartan and J

    E. Cartan and J. A. Schouten. On Riemannian geometries admitting an absolute parallelism.Proc. Akad. Wekensch, Amsterdam, 29:933–946, 1926. (Cited on page 15)

    1926

  9. [15]

    Cartan and J

    E. Cartan and J. A. Schouten. On the geometry of the group manifold of simple and semisimple groups.Proc. Akad. Wekensch, Amsterdam, 29:803–815, 1926. (Cited on page 15)

    1926

  10. [16]

    Chinea and J

    D. Chinea and J. C. Marrero. Classifications of almost contact metric structures.Rev. Roumaine Math. Pures Appl., 37:199–212, 1992. (Cited on pages 2, 6, 27, and 29)

    1992

  11. [17]

    Conti and T

    D. Conti and T. B. Madsen. The odd side of torsion geometry.Ann. Mat. Pura Appl., 193(4):1041– 1067, 2014. (Cited on pages 2 and 6)

    2014

  12. [18]

    Couzens, J

    C. Couzens, J. P. Gauntlett, D. Martelli, and J. Sparks. A geometric dual of c-extremization.J. High Energy Phys., 2019(1):001, 2019. (Cited on pages 24 and 25)

    2019

  13. [19]

    Demailly

    J-P. Demailly. Sur l’identité de Bochner-Kodaira-Nakano en géométrie hermitienne. InSéminaire d’analyse P. Lelong-P. Dolbeault-H. Skoda, années 1983/1984, volume 1198 ofLecture Notes in Math., pages 88–97. Springer, Berlin, 1986. (Cited on pages 34 and 35)

    1983

  14. [21]

    Fadel, E

    D. Fadel, E. Loubeau, A. J. Moreno, and H. N. Sá Earp. Flows of geometric structures.J. Reine Angew. Math., 817:67–152, 2024. (Cited on pages 29 and 30) 40 Sasaki with torsion manifolds and string backgrounds

    2024

  15. [22]

    Fino and G

    A. Fino and G. Grantcharov. Properties of manifolds with skew-symmetric torsion and special holonomy.Adv. Math., 189(2):439–450, 2004. (Cited on page 1)

    2004

  16. [23]

    Friedrich and S

    T. Friedrich and S. Ivanov. Parallel spinors and connections with skew-symmetric torsion in string theory.Asian J. Math., 6(2):303–335, 2002. (Cited on pages 1, 2, 6, 10, 33, 37, and 38)

    2002

  17. [24]

    Friedrich and S

    T. Friedrich and S. Ivanov. Almost contact manifolds, connections with torsion, and parallel spinors. J. Reine Angew. Math., 559:217–236, 2003. (Cited on pages 1, 6, and 25)

    2003

  18. [25]

    Garcia-Fernandez, J

    M. Garcia-Fernandez, J. Jordan, and J. Streets. Non-kähler calabi–yau geometry and pluriclosed flow.J. Math. Pures Appl., 177:329–367, 2023. (Cited on page 2)

    2023

  19. [26]

    Garcia-Fernandez and J

    M. Garcia-Fernandez and J. Streets.Generalized Ricci flow, volume 76 ofUniversity Lecture Series. Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, RI, 2021. (Cited on pages 1, 2, and 36)

    2021

  20. [27]

    J. P. Gauntlett and N. Kim. Geometries with killing spinors and supersymmetric ads solutions. Comm. Math. Phys., 284(3):897–918, 2008. (Cited on page 24)

    2008

  21. [28]

    Godlinski, W

    M. Godlinski, W. Kopczynski, and P. Nurowski. Locally Sasakian manifolds.Classical Quantum Gravity, 17(18):L105, 2000. (Cited on pages 5 and 33)

    2000

  22. [29]

    Goldstein and S

    E. Goldstein and S. Prokushkin. Geometric Model for Complex Non-Kähler Manifolds with SU(3) Structure.Commun. Math. Phys., 251(1):65–78, 2004. (Cited on page 34)

    2004

  23. [30]

    Grantcharov, G

    D. Grantcharov, G. Grantcharov, and Y. S. Poon. Calabi–yau connections with torsion on toric bundles.J. Differential Geom., 78(1):13–32, 2008. (Cited on pages 18 and 21)

    2008

  24. [31]

    GeometryofquaternionicKählerconnectionswithtorsion.J

    S.Ivanov. GeometryofquaternionicKählerconnectionswithtorsion.J. Geom. Phys., 41(3):235–257,

  25. [32]

    Ivanov and G

    S. Ivanov and G. Papadopoulos. Vanishing theorems and string backgrounds.Classical Quantum Gravity, 18(6):1089–1110, 2001. (Cited on pages 1 and 2)

    2001

  26. [33]

    Ivanov and A

    S. Ivanov and A. Petkov. HKT manifolds with holonomySL(n,H).Int. Math. Res. Not. IMRN, 2012:3779–3799, 2012. (Cited on page 2)

    2012

  27. [34]

    Ivanov and N

    S. Ivanov and N. Stanchev. The Riemannian Bianchi identities of metric connections with skew torsion and generalized Ricci solitons.Results Math., 79(8):Paper No. 270, 20, 2024. (Cited on page 8)

    2024

  28. [36]

    H. Li. Topology of co-symplectic/co-Kähler manifolds.Asian J. Math., 12(4):527–543, 2008. (Cited on page 6)

    2008

  29. [37]

    J. Milnor. Curvatures of left invariant metrics on Lie groups.Advances in Math., 21(3):293–329,

  30. [38]

    Morimoto

    A. Morimoto. On normal almost contact structures.J. Math. Soc. Japan, 15:420–436, 1963. (Cited on page 11)

    1963

  31. [39]

    Papadopoulos and P

    G. Papadopoulos and P. K. Townsend. Compactifications of d=11 supergravity on spaces of excep- tional holonomy.Phys. Lett. B, 357:300, 1995. (Cited on page 19)

    1995

  32. [40]

    H. V. Pittie. The Dolbeault-cohomology ring of a compact, even-dimensional Lie group.Proc. Indian Acad. Sci. Math. Sci., 98(2-3):117–152, 1988. (Cited on page 13)

    1988

  33. [41]

    Salamon.Riemannian geometry and holonomy groups, volume 201 ofPitman Research Notes in Mathematics Series

    S. Salamon.Riemannian geometry and holonomy groups, volume 201 ofPitman Research Notes in Mathematics Series. Longman Scientific & Technical, Harlow, 1989. (Cited on page 30)

    1989

  34. [42]

    Samelson

    H. Samelson. A class of complex-analytic manifolds.Portugal. Math., 12:129–132, 1953. (Cited on pages 13 and 14)

    1953

  35. [43]

    Smoczyk, G

    K. Smoczyk, G. Wang, and Y. Zhang. The Sasaki-Ricci flow.Int. J. Math., 21(07):951–969, 2010. (Cited on pages 7, 31, 33, and 34)

    2010

  36. [44]

    Streets and G

    J. Streets and G. Tian. A parabolic flow of pluriclosed metrics.Int. Math. Res. Not. IMRN, 2010(16):3101–3133, 2010. (Cited on page 4)

    2010

  37. [45]

    Streets and G

    J. Streets and G. Tian. Regularity results for pluriclosed flow.Geom. Topol., 17(4), 2013. (Cited on page 4) 41 Sasaki with torsion manifolds and string backgrounds

    2013

  38. [46]

    Tischler

    D. Tischler. On fibering certain foliated manifolds overS1.Topology, 9:153–154, 1970. (Cited on page 22)

    1970

  39. [47]

    Q. Wang, B. Yang, and F. Zheng. On Bismut flat manifolds.Trans. Amer. Math. Soc., 373(8):5747– 5772, 2020. (Cited on pages 2, 11, and 16)

    2020

  40. [48]

    Y. Ye. Bismut einstein metrics on compact complex manifolds.J. Funct. Anal., 288(6), 2025. (Cited on page 36)

    2025

  41. [49]

    Zhao and F

    Q. Zhao and F. Zheng. Strominger connection and pluriclosed metrics.J. Reine Angew. Math., 796:245–267, 2023. (Cited on page 8)

    2023

  42. [50]

    G. Peano

    Q. Zhao and F. Zheng. Curvature characterisation of Hermitian manifolds with Bismut parallel torsion.arXiv:2407.10497, 2024. (Cited on page 9) B. Brienza Instituto Nacional de Matemática Pura e Aplicada (IMPA), Estrada Dona Castorina, 110, CEP 22460-320 Rio de Janeiro, RJ (Bra...

    2024 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.