Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 40 references

Transverse Instability and Bifurcation Analysis of the line soliton for the NLS equation on a Fractured Strip

T0 review · 2 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read For the nonlinear Schrödinger equation on a strip with an attractive line defect, the paper proves that the one-dimensional line soliton is orbitally stable below the critical width $L_*=\pi/\sqrt{\lambda_1}$, unstable above it, and that…

desk verdict Solid bifurcation analysis for the attractive delta strip, but the small-gamma stability conclusion in Theorem 1.5 has a sign contradiction and an unjustified inverse limit; the core pitchfork and line-soliton threshold still deserve review. read the letter →

arxiv 2608.09553 v1 pith:HA3T7TEN submitted 2026-08-10 math.AP

Hiroaki Kikuchi , Boris Shakarov , Kenta Tomioka This is my paper · ORCID
classification math.AP MSC 35Q5535A1535B38
keywords nonlinearSchrödingerequationstandingwavesactiongroundstateenergyquantumgraphsdimensionalreductiontransverseinstabilitypitchforkbifurcation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper studies the nonlinear Schrödinger equation on a two-dimensional strip $\mathbb{R}\times[0,L]$ with an attractive delta interaction along the $x$-axis, modelling a waveguide with a fracture, and asks how the strip width $L$ affects the standing waves inherited from the one-dimensional problem. Its central claim is that the line soliton — the one-dimensional ground state of the delta-potential NLS, extended constantly in the transverse direction — is orbitally stable for $0L_*$, where $-\lambda_1$ is the unique negative eigenvalue of the one-dimensional linearized operator at the soliton. At the critical width this eigenvalue crosses zero, and the paper constructs, by the standard reduction to a scalar bifurcation equation, a $C^2$ branch of positive two-dimensional stationary solutions that emerges from the line soliton in a pitchfork. The direction of the pitchfork and the orbital stability of the emerging states are both controlled by one explicitly computed coefficient, $d^2L/da^2(0)$, whose sign the paper evaluates for small attractive coupling and finds to be positive. A sympathetic reader should care because the paper turns a geometric parameter (strip width) into a sharp, computable stability threshold and predicts that the unstable line soliton is replaced by a genuinely two-dimensional stable profile.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the one-dimensional linearized operator $L_{+,0}=-\partial_{xx}+\omega+\gamma\delta_0-p\phi_{\omega,\gamma}^{p-1}$ around the ground state $\phi_{\omega,\gamma}$; its lowest eigenvalue $-\lambda_1$ is assumed simple and spectrally isolated, and the whole argument is organized around that single number. After separating variables in the transverse direction, the $n$-th Fourier mode of the linearized operator on the strip is $L_{+,0}+(n\pi/L)^2$, so the first mode crosses zero exactly when $L$ equals $L_*=\pi/\sqrt{\lambda_1}$. The bifurcation analysis reduces the stationary problem $H_L u+\omega u-|u|^{p-1}u=0$ to a scalar equation on the kernel span of $\xi=\sqrt{2}\cos(\pi y)\chi_\gamma$; the auxiliary (infinite-dimensional) part is solved by the implicit function theorem, and the remaining scalar bifurcation function $g(a,L)$ satisfies $g(0,L_*)=0$, $\partial_a g(0,L_*)=0$, and $\partial_L g(0,L_*) = \lambda'_* = -2\pi^2 L_*^{-3}<0$, which is exactly the transversality condition for a pitchfork. The second derivative of the width, $d^2L/da^2(0)$, is computed by differentiating the reduced equation twice; its explicit formula contains an integral term and an inner product with the inverse of $L_{+,0}+(2\pi/L_*)^2$ on the orthogonal complement of the kernel, and its sign is fixed by continuity from the exactly solvable case $\gamma=0$, where the sign is positive.

What would settle it

A direct numerical test is to compute the lowest eigenvalues of $L_{+,0}$ for chosen $\gamma<0$, $\omega>\gamma^2/4$, and $2\le p<5$, then simulate the stationary strip equation (or the full NLS flow) for widths around $L_*=\pi/\sqrt{\lambda_1}$: if the line soliton remains orbitally stable for some $L>L_*$, or if the bifurcating branch appears on the opposite side from the sign of $d^2L/da^2(0)$ — equivalently, if the second eigenvalue $\lambda_2(a)$ of the linearized operator does not behave like $-d^2L/da^2(0)\,\lambda'_* a^2$ with $\lambda'_*<0$ — then the threshold or the stability criterion fails. A cheaper spectral check consists in verifying numerically that $-\lambda_1$ is simple and that the first transverse mode crosses zero exactly at $L_*$.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The discovery is a transverse pitchfork bifurcation with a sharp stability threshold. For any attractive coupling $\gamma<0$, frequency $\omega>\gamma^2/4$, and power nonlinearity with $1<p<5$, the line soliton $\phi_{\omega,\gamma}(x)$ solves the strip equation because it is independent of $y$. The paper proves that this solution is orbitally stable exactly for widths $0<L<L_*=\pi/\sqrt{\lambda_1}$ and is orbitally unstable for $L>L_*$; here $-\lambda_1$ is the smallest, simple, isolated eigenvalue of the one-dimensional linearized operator $L_{+,0}=-\partial_{xx}+\omega+\gamma\delta_0-p\phi_{\omega,\gamma}^{p-1}$. At $L=L_*$ the first transverse mode $\xi=\sqrt{2}\cos(\pi y)\chi_\gamma$ (with $\chi_\gamma$ the normalized eigenfunction of $L_{+,0}$) enters the kernel of the linearized operator on the strip, and a standard reduction to the one-dimensional kernel yields a $C^2$ family of positive stationary solutions $\varphi(a)$ with width $L(a)=L_*+\frac12\frac{d^2L}{da^2}(0)a^2+o(a^2)$ and profile $\varphi(a)=\phi_{\omega,\gamma}+a\xi+O(a^2)$. The sign of the coefficient $d^2L/da^2(0)$, which the paper computes in closed form and shows to be positive for all sufficiently small attractive couplings, determines both the side on which the branch opens and, through the Morse index of the linearized action, whether the bifurcating solitons are orbitally stable or unstable.

Load-bearing premise

The argument assumes that the one-dimensional stability problem has exactly one negative direction — the eigenvalue $-\lambda_1$ — and that this direction is isolated from the rest of the spectrum; if a second nearly-crossing direction existed near the critical width, the reduction to a single bifurcation equation and the predicted stability threshold would both fail.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • For $0<L<L_*$ the line soliton is orbitally stable; for $L>L_*$ it is linearly unstable and the instability persists nonlinearly, so the threshold is a true dynamical transition, not merely a spectral event.
  • At $L=L_*$ the linearized operator has a one-dimensional kernel spanned by the first transverse mode, so the bifurcation is necessarily a steady pitchfork with width changing quadratically in the amplitude.
  • The sign of $d^2L/da^2(0)$ decides everything: it selects the side of $L_*$ on which the new branch exists, fixes the Morse index of the linearized action, and therefore determines whether the bifurcating two-dimensional solitons are orbitally stable.
  • For sufficiently small attractive coupling and small amplitude, the coefficient is positive, so the bifurcating branch is made of orbitally stable two-dimensional solitons that replace the unstable line soliton.
  • The paper also closes the local well-posedness loop for the model: well-posedness in $H^1$, mass/energy conservation, and global existence for $p<3$ follow from Strichartz estimates adapted to the strip.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The threshold mechanism is purely geometric — only the spacing of Neumann transverse modes and the position of the single negative eigenvalue of $L_{+,0}$ enter — so an analogous stability threshold should appear for any confinement with a discrete transverse spectrum, not just the flat strip, whenever the longitudinal linearized operator has one simple negative eigenvalue.
  • Because the stability conclusion for small $|\gamma|$ is obtained by perturbation from $\gamma=0$, a natural numerical test is to evaluate the closed-form formula for $d^2L/da^2(0)$ at moderate couplings; a sign change away from $\gamma=0$ would mark a regime where the bifurcating branch becomes unstable, which is not covered by the paper's small-$\gamma$ statement.
  • The result suggests a concrete observable in waveguide experiments: as the transverse width is tuned past $L_*$, the otherwise uniform (in $y$) soliton should spontaneously develop a $\cos(\pi y/L)$ modulation, since that is the kernel mode that drives the pitchfork.
  • The same reduction could be applied to the repulsive case $\gamma>0$, although the line soliton is already unstable on the line; the bifurcation analysis would then describe additional branches rather than a stability threshold.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper studies the nonlinear Schrödinger equation on a strip R×[0,L] with Neumann boundary conditions and an attractive delta interaction on the x-axis. It establishes local well-posedness in H^1, then identifies a critical width L_* = π/√λ_1 at which the line soliton becomes transversely unstable: orbital stability for 0<L<L_*, orbital instability for L>L_*. At L=L_*, a simple eigenvalue of the linearized operator crosses zero and a C^2 branch of positive stationary solutions bifurcates in a pitchfork. The paper derives an explicit formula for the second derivative d²L/da²(0), which determines the direction of the branch and, through the Grillakis–Shatah–Strauss criterion, the stability of the bifurcating solutions. The final part claims that the bifurcating branch is orbitally stable for sufficiently small |γ| and |a|.

Significance. The main bifurcation and stability results are significant and of current interest: they provide a complete spectral mechanism for transverse instability in a geometrically nontrivial waveguide with a singular potential, and the Lyapunov–Schmidt reduction is carried out in detail. The identification of the critical length L_* and the Morse-index-based stability/instability criterion for the line soliton are clean and, conditional on the cited spectral facts, convincing. The paper also demonstrates sound technique in the well-posedness and instability arguments. However, the advertised small-γ stability of the bifurcating branch rests on a sign-contradictory and analytically singular limiting argument, so that the last theorem's 'moreover' claim is not justified as written.

major comments (2)
  1. [§5.3, proof of Theorem 1.5, Case γ=0 and Case γ<0 (pp. 40–43)] There is a sign contradiction in the limit passage. Eq. (152) states λ'_* d²L/da²(0) ≤ (negative expression) for γ=0. Since λ'_* = -2L_*^{-3}π² < 0 by Eq. (65), this inequality implies d²L/da²(0) > 0 at γ=0. Yet the text immediately concludes 'lim_{γ→0-} d²L/da²(0) = ... < 0' and then 'd²L/da²(0)<0 for all γ∈(-γ_0,0]'. This contradicts the preceding bound. Moreover, Theorem 1.5 asserts stability for small |γ|, which requires d²L/da²(0)>0; the final '<0' would instead give instability. The sign in the γ=0 bound or in the continuity conclusion must be corrected, and the two parts of the proof currently disagree.
  2. [§5.3, Case γ<0 (pp. 42–43) and Eq. (89)] The perturbation argument from γ=0 is not justified because A_0(γ) is singular at γ=0. For γ=0, L_{+,0}(0) = -∂_xx + ω - pφ_{ω,0}^{p-1} has the translation zero mode φ'_{ω,0}, which is odd in x and therefore orthogonal to ξ = √2 cos(πy)χ_0, so φ'_{ω,0} lies in H^2_ort. Hence the operator P⊥(L_{+,0}(0)-L_*^{-2}∂_yy) restricted to H^2_ort is not invertible, and the claimed operator-norm convergence of A_n^{-1}(γ) to A_n^{-1}(0) fails for n=0. The modal formula uses A_0^{-1}(0) on the even source f0 = φ_{ω,0}^{2p-1}; this requires a generalized inverse on the even subspace and a uniform bound on A_0^{-1}(γ) as γ→0, neither of which is supplied. The assertion that the operators A_n(γ) with A_0 restricted to H^2_ort are uniformly coercive for small |γ| is false because the small eigenvalue of L_{+,0}(γ) tends to 0 as γ→0. Thus the continuity of d²L/da²(0) at γ=0 is not established.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Theorem 1.5 statement] In the 'Moreover' sentence the family is denoted ϕ(a), while everywhere else the bifurcating family is called φ(a); please unify the notation.
  2. [§5.3, Proposition 5.4] The sentence 'where ϕ(a) is defined in' is incomplete; it should refer to the definition of φ(a) in Theorem 1.2 or Proposition 4.1.
  3. [Eq. (89) and surrounding text] The notation 'L−2∗∂yy' is a typographical artifact; it should read 'L_*^{-2}∂_yy' consistently with Eq. (42) and the rest of the paper.
  4. [References] References [24] and [26] are duplicated (the same Grillakis–Shatah–Strauss paper); please collapse them.
  5. [Appendix B, Lemma B.2] The statement 'For any n∈R, n≥0' should specify n integer; the proof treats Fourier modes n∈N∪{0}.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the critical length and bifurcation/stability results are derived from stated spectral inputs, not fitted; the only self-citation ([13]) is an auxiliary coercivity lemma that is independent of the target result.

full rationale

The paper's central derivation chain is self-contained relative to its stated spectral hypotheses. L* = pi/sqrt(lambda_1) is defined from the one-dimensional linearized operator L_{+,0} via Proposition 2.3 (quoted from [33], which has no author overlap with the present paper), and the bifurcation threshold is obtained by solving D_uF(L*,phi)xi = (-lambda_1 + pi^2/L*^2)xi = 0, not by fitting the instability to data. The Grillakis-Shatah-Strauss stability and instability criteria for L<L* and L>L* are evaluated by the sign of the modal eigenvalues (n pi/L)^2 - lambda_1, again from the same spectral input. The branch construction uses Lyapunov-Schmidt reduction with the kernel spanned by xi; the requisite invertibility on H^2_ort requires the Fredholm alternative, for which the paper invokes [13, Lemma 3.3] (a self-citation by the second author) only for the auxiliary coercivity of H_L + omega. That lemma is a standard operator fact with stated assumptions that do not include the bifurcation or stability conclusions, so it is independent support rather than a circular premise. No fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction, and no uniqueness theorem from the authors' own prior work is used to forbid alternatives. A separate correctness concern exists in the final stability proof of Theorem 1.5: the claimed sign lim_{gamma->0-} d^2L/da^2(0) < 0 conflicts with the inequality (152) (which, with lambda'_* < 0, forces d^2L/da^2(0) > 0 at gamma = 0) and with the theorem's own stability condition d^2L/da^2(0) > 0; also the gamma = 0 limit of A_0^{-1} is singular because of the translation zero mode. These are mathematical gaps in the perturbation argument, not instances of the derivation reducing to its own inputs by definition, so they do not raise the circularity score.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No data are fitted and no new entities are introduced. The parameters gamma, omega, p, L are physical inputs of the model. The critical length L* and the coefficient d^2L/da^2(0) are derived from the spectral problem rather than chosen to match a target. The paper relies on standard background results and on prior spectral properties of the one-dimensional operator, which are cited explicitly.

assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption The operator L_{+,0} has exactly one negative eigenvalue -lambda_1, which is simple and isolated, and its spectrum is otherwise contained in [C_omega, infinity) (Proposition 2.3, Eq. (19)).
    This spectral gap is the input that defines L* and makes the kernel at the bifurcation point one-dimensional. It is cited to [33] rather than proved here.
  • standard math Strichartz estimates hold for the one-dimensional operator -partial_xx + gamma delta_0 with constants uniform in the spectral shift m (Eq. (26), from [1, 3]).
    These estimates are the basis of the well-posedness proof in Section 3 and are taken from the cited literature.
  • standard math The Grillakis-Shatah-Strauss stability criterion and the spectral mapping property for the linearized semigroup are valid (Sections 5 and Appendices B, C).
    The paper applies the GSS framework [24, 25] and proves the spectral mapping property via resolvent bounds, relying on standard semigroup theory [5, 20].
  • standard math Positive stationary solutions decay exponentially in x (Lemma 4.8, from Berestycki-Nirenberg [6]).
    Exponential decay is used to justify dominated convergence in the computation of d^2L/da^2 and to control the nonlinearity at the origin for 2<p<3.
  • domain assumption The form associated with H_L+omega is coercive on D(H_L) for every L>0 (cited to [13, Lemma 3.3]).
    This coercivity is used in Appendix A to prove the surjectivity of the linearized operator on the orthogonal complement; the cited lemma is from the second author's own prior work.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Transverse Instability and Bifurcation Analysis of the line soliton for the NLS equation on a Fractured Strip." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/HA3T7TEN

@misc{pith2026260809553,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Transverse Instability and Bifurcation Analysis of the line soliton for the NLS equation on a Fractured Strip},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/HA3T7TEN}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2608.09553}
}
abstract

We consider the nonlinear Schr\"odinger equation on a two-dimensional strip with an attractive $\delta$ interaction and power nonlinearity. We investigate the transverse stability and bifurcation of line solitons as the width of the strip varies. We first establish local well-posedness in $H^1$, conservation of mass and energy, and global existence in the $H^1$-subcritical regime. We then identify a critical width $L_*$ at which the line soliton undergoes a transverse instability. More precisely, we prove orbital stability for $L<L_*$ and orbital instability for $L>L_*$. At the critical width, a simple eigenvalue of the linearized operator crosses zero, and we construct, via the Lyapunov-Schmidt reduction, a branch of positive nontrivial stationary solutions bifurcating from the line soliton. We determine the direction of this bifurcation by computing the second-order variation of the width along the branch. Finally, we investigate the orbital stability of the bifurcating solitons and obtain a stability criterion which can be evaluated in the regime of sufficiently small interaction strength.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

40 extracted references · 40 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Adami, C

    R. Adami, C. Cacciapuoti, D. Finco, and D. Noja. Fast solitons on star graphs. Rev. Math. Phys., 23(4):409–451, 2011

    work page 2011

  2. [2]

    Adami, D

    R. Adami, D. Noja, and N. Visciglia. Constrained energy minimization and ground states for NLS with point defects. Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst., Ser. B, 18(5):1155–1188, 2013

    work page 2013

  3. [3]

    Adami and A

    R. Adami and A. Sacchetti. The transition from diffusion to blow-up for a nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equation in dimension 1. J. Phys. A, Math. Gen., 38(39):8379–8392, 2005

    work page 2005

  4. [4]

    Akahori, Y

    T. Akahori, Y. Bahri, S. Ibrahim, and H. Kikuchi. Pitchfork bifurcation at line solitons for nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equations on the product spaceR×T. Ann. Henri Poincar´ e, 25(7):3467–3497, 2024

    work page 2024

  5. [5]

    W. Arendt. One-Parameter Semigroups of Positive Operators. Number v.1184 in Lecture Notes in Math- ematics Ser. Springer Berlin / Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 1986

    work page 1986

  6. [6]

    Berestycki and L

    H. Berestycki and L. Nirenberg. Some qualitative properties of solutions of semilinear elliptic equations in cylindrical domains. Analysis, et cetera, Res. Pap. in Honor of J. Moser’s 60th Birthd., 115-164 (1990)., 1990

    work page 1990

  7. [7]

    Berestycki and J

    H. Berestycki and J. Wei. On least energy solutions to a semilinear elliptic equation in a strip. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems-A, 28(3):1083–1099, 2010

    work page 2010

  8. [8]

    Berkolaiko and P

    G. Berkolaiko and P. Kuchment. Introduction to quantum graphs, volume 186 of Math. Surv. Monogr. Providence, RI: American Mathematical Society (AMS), 2013

    work page 2013

Show all 40 references
  1. [9]

    S. J. Bernau. The square root of a positive self-adjoint operator. J. Aust. Math. Soc., 8:17–36, 1968

    1968

  2. [10]

    Boni and R

    F. Boni and R. Carlone. NLS ground states on the half-line with point interactions. NoDEA Nonlinear Differential Equations Appl., 30(4):Paper No. 51, 23, 2023

    2023

  3. [11]

    H. Brezis. Functional analysis, Sobolev spaces and partial differential equations, volume 2,3. Springer, 2011

    2011

  4. [12]

    Cazenave and P.-L

    T. Cazenave and P.-L. Lions. Orbital stability of standing waves for some nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equa- tions. Communications in Mathematical Physics, 85:549–561, 1982

    1982

  5. [13]

    S. L. Coz and B. Shakarov. Ground states on a fractured strip and one dimensional reduction. Preprint, arXiv:2411.18187 [math.AP] (2024), 2024

    2024 arXiv

  6. [14]

    M. G. Crandall and P. H. Rabinowitz. Bifurcation from simple eigenvalues. J. Functional Analysis, 8:321–340, 1971

    1971

  7. [15]

    Fukuizumi and L

    R. Fukuizumi and L. Jeanjean. Stability of standing waves for a nonlinear Schrodinger equation with a repulsive Dirac delta potential. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems, 21(1):121, 2008

    2008

  8. [16]

    Fukuizumi, M

    R. Fukuizumi, M. Ohta, and T. Ozawa. Nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equation with a point defect.Ann. Inst. Henri Poincar´ e,Anal. Non Lin´ eaire, 25(5):837–845, 2008

    2008

  9. [17]

    Fukuizumi, M

    R. Fukuizumi, M. Ohta, and T. Ozawa. Nonlinear schr¨ odinger equation with a point defect. InAnnales de l’Institut Henri Poincar´ eC, Analyse non lin´ eaire, volume 25,5, pages 837–845. Elsevier, 2008

    2008

  10. [18]

    Genoud, S

    F. Genoud, S. Le Coz, and J. Royer. A minimal mass blow-up solution on a nonlinear quantum star graph. arXiv:2302.09678, 2023

    2023 arXiv

  11. [19]

    Georgiev and M

    V. Georgiev and M. Ohta. Nonlinear instability of linearly unstable standing waves for nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equations.J. Math. Soc. Japan, 64(2):533–548, 2012

    2012

  12. [20]

    Gesztesy, C

    F. Gesztesy, C. K. R. T. Jones, Y. Latushkin, and M. Stanislavova. A spectral mapping theorem and invariant manifolds for nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equations.Indiana Univ. Math. J., 49(1):221–243, 2000

    2000

  13. [21]

    Ginibre and G

    J. Ginibre and G. Velo. Scattering theory in the energy space for a class of nonlinear wave equations. Comm. Math. Phys., 123(4):535–573, 1989

    1989

  14. [22]

    R. H. Goodman, P. J. Holmes, and M. I. Weinstein. Strong NLS soliton–defect interactions. Phys. D: Nonlinear Phenomena, 192(3-4):215–248, 2004

    2004

  15. [23]

    Grillakis

    M. Grillakis. Linearized instability for nonlinear Schr¨ odinger and Klein-Gordon equations. Commun. Pure Appl. Math., 41(6):747–774, 1988

    1988

  16. [24]

    Grillakis, J

    M. Grillakis, J. Shatah, and W. Strauss. Stability theory of solitary waves in the presence of symmetry. I. J. Funct. Anal., 74(1):160–197, 1987

    1987

  17. [25]

    Grillakis, J

    M. Grillakis, J. Shatah, and W. Strauss. Stability theory of solitary waves in the presence of symmetry. II. J. Funct. Anal., 94(2):308–348, 1990

    1990

  18. [26]

    M. G. Grillakis, J. Shatah, and W. Strauss. Stability theory of solitary waves in the presence of symmetry. II. J. Funct. Anal., 94(2):308–348, 1990. BIFURCATION ANALYSIS ON A FRACTURED STRIP 49

    1990

  19. [27]

    Grisvard

    P. Grisvard. Elliptic problems in nonsmooth domains, volume 69 of Class. Appl. Math. Philadelphia, PA: Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics (SIAM), reprint of the 1985 hardback ed. edition, 2011

    1985

  20. [28]

    Gustafson and T

    S. Gustafson and T. Inui. Threshold even solutions to the nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equation with delta potential at high frequencies. Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst., 44(10):3135–3176, 2024

    2024

  21. [29]

    Kapitula and K

    T. Kapitula and K. Promislow. Spectral and dynamical stability of nonlinear waves, volume 185 ofAppl. Math. Sci. New York, NY: Springer, 2013

    2013

  22. [30]

    T. Kato. Perturbation Theory for Linear Operators, volume 132 of Grundlehren der mathematischen Wissenschaften. Springer-Verlag, Berlin-Heidelberg, 2nd edition, 1980

    1980

  23. [31]

    T. Kato. On nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equations. Ann. Inst. Henri Poincar´ e,Phys. Th´ eor., 46:113–129, 1987

    1987

  24. [32]

    E. Kirr, P. G. Kevrekidis, and D. E. Pelinovsky. Symmetry-breaking bifurcation in the nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equation with symmetric potentials.Comm. Math. Phys., 308(3):795–844, 2011

    2011

  25. [33]

    Le Coz, R

    S. Le Coz, R. Fukuizumi, G. Fibich, B. Ksherim, and Y. Sivan. Instability of bound states of a nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equation with a Dirac potential.Phys. D, 237(8):1103–1128, 2008

    2008

  26. [34]

    D. E. Pelinovsky and T. V. Phan. Normal form for the symmetry-breaking bifurcation in the nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equation.J. Differ. Equations, 253(10):2796–2824, 2012

    2012

  27. [35]

    Rousset and N

    F. Rousset and N. Tzvetkov. Transverse nonlinear instability of solitary waves for some Hamiltonian PDE’s. J. Math. Pures Appl. (9), 90(6):550–590, 2008

    2008

  28. [36]

    Rousset and N

    F. Rousset and N. Tzvetkov. A simple criterion of transverse linear instability for solitary waves. Math. Res. Lett., 17(1):157–169, 2010

    2010

  29. [37]

    Shatah and W

    J. Shatah and W. Strauss. Spectral condition for instability. In Nonlinear PDE’s, dynamics and continuum physics (South Hadley, MA, 1998), volume 255 of Contemp. Math., pages 189–198. Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, RI, 2000

    1998

  30. [38]

    M. I. Weinstein. Modulational stability of ground states of nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equations. SIAM J. Math. Anal., 16:472–491, 1985

    1985

  31. [39]

    M. I. Weinstein. Lyapunov stability of ground states of nonlinear dispersive evolution equations. Commun. Pure Appl. Math., 39:51–67, 1986

    1986

  32. [40]

    Yamazaki

    Y. Yamazaki. Stability of line standing waves near the bifurcation point for nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equations. Kodai Math. J., 38(1):65–96, 2015. Department of Mathematics; Tsuda University; 2-1-1 Tsuda-machi, Kodaira-shi, Tokyo 187-8577 (JAPAN) Email address:hiroaki@tsuda.ac...

    2015

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.