Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 86 references

Thermodynamic Spectroscopy of Emergent Excitations in Quantum Spin Ice

T0 review · 2 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-15 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A weak transverse perturbation makes the temperature derivative of the conjugate observable proportional to the ring-exchange specific heat in quantum spin ice, providing a thermodynamic probe of the ring-exchange scale and the flux sector.

desk verdict New thermodynamic probe for ring-exchange scale in QSI; clean derivation and honest ED, but the numerical verification sits at the four-loop boundary scale, not the hexagon scale used for materials. read the letter →

arxiv 2608.11305 v1 pith:7SF5IBN5 submitted 2026-08-11 cond-mat.str-el

Zhengbang Zhou , Tony An , Yong Baek Kim This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.str-el
keywords quantumspinicepyrochlorelatticeringexchangethermalexpansionmagnetizationderivativefluxsectoremergentphotoncovariancespectroscopy
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Quantum spin ice is expected to possess two energy scales: a spinon gap near $J_{zz}/2$ and a lower ring-exchange scale $g=12J_\pm^3/J_{zz}^2$ that sets the photon bandwidth and vison energy. The paper argues that this lower scale can be seen thermodynamically even when the specific heat cannot resolve it: apply a weak perturbation coupled only to the transverse pseudospin components, and take the temperature derivative of the conjugate observable. The central identity, Eq. (7), states that this derivative is proportional to the ring-exchange specific heat and therefore peaks at the ring-exchange scale. In non-Kramers pyrochlores the probe is realized as the difference of thermal expansion coefficients along $[100]$ and $[010]$; in dipolar-octupolar pyrochlores it is $dM/dT$ under a weak field. The sign of the response and the direction of its peak shift identify whether the ground state has zero flux or $\pi$-flux.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the dressed ring-exchange Hamiltonian $H_{\mathrm{ring}}(\lambda)=-\sum_\mu g^{\mathrm{eff}}_\mu(\lambda)W_\mu$, where $W_\mu$ flips the six spins around a hexagon of orientation $\mu$. A weak transverse field $\lambda\hat X$ acts within the ice manifold only in pairs, replacing one exchange insertion with two field insertions and renormalizing each hexagon coupling by the factor $1+B_\mu(p)\lambda^2/(J_\pm J_{zz})$. Because the field enters the low-energy sector only through these couplings, the chain rule converts the covariance $T^{-2}\mathrm{Cov}_T(\hat X,H_{\mathrm{ring}})$ into $-2B(p)\lambda/(J_\pm J_{zz})\, C_{\mathrm{ring}}(T)$, which is Eq. (7).

What would settle it

A clean experimental test is to measure dM/dT in a dipolar-octupolar pyrochlore with $\theta$ near zero: if no positive lobe appears at the ring-exchange scale, or if its sign disagrees with the known flux sector, Eq. (7) fails for that material. A numerical falsifier is a cluster calculation whose lowest loop scale is the hexagon $g=12J_\pm^3/J_{zz}^2$; if the response peak there does not track $g$ with the coefficient $B(p)=15$, the thermodynamic-limit claim is unsupported.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's claim is the proportionality $\gamma_X|_{\mathrm{ring}} = -2B(p)\lambda/(J_\pm J_{zz})\, C_{\mathrm{ring}}(T) + O(\lambda^3)$, where $\gamma_X=d\langle \hat X\rangle/dT$ is the thermal response of an observable conjugate to a weak transverse perturbation of strength $\lambda$, $B(p)\ge 0$ is a form-factor coefficient, and $C_{\mathrm{ring}}$ is the specific heat of the effective ring-exchange Hamiltonian. Within the low-temperature ice manifold (states with zero spinon charge on every tetrahedron), the perturbation only dresses the ring-exchange coupling, so the response tracks the ring-exchange anomaly rather than the spinon anomaly; the sign of the proportionality constant is set by $J_\pm$, positive in the $\pi$-flux sector and negative in the zero-flux sector. For the sublattice-uniform $E_g$ probe the relation is exact within a one-coupling ring Hamiltonian. Exact diagonalization on a 16-site pyrochlore cluster verifies the proportionality and the sign law in the perturbative limit, albeit at the boundary four-loop scale $g_4=4J_\pm^2/J_{zz}$ rather than the thermodynamic hexagon scale $g$.

Load-bearing premise

The claim collapses if the low-energy sector of the standard nearest-neighbor XXZ pyrochlore model is not a single ring-exchange term that a weak transverse strain or field merely dresses; for dipolar-octupolar materials it also requires a purely transverse Zeeman coupling, and for the thermodynamic limit the 16-site four-loop verification must be replaced by a genuine hexagon check.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • In non-Kramers pyrochlores such as Pr2Zr2O7 and Pr2Hf2O7, the difference of thermal expansion coefficients along [100] and [010] should show a peak at the ring-exchange scale, with no direct nuclear Schottky background.
  • In dipolar-octupolar pyrochlores with a purely transverse Zeeman coupling (theta = 0), |dM/dT| peaks at the ring-exchange scale.
  • The sign of the response (positive for pi-flux, negative for zero-flux), combined with the direction of the peak shift under increasing strain or field, distinguishes the two flux sectors.
  • dM/dT can separate ring-exchange and spinon features that merge in the specific heat, because the two contributions enter with opposite signs.
  • A nonzero mixing angle theta moves the low-temperature dM/dT extremum away from the ring-exchange scale to a field-set scale, making the measurement a diagnostic of theta.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the proportionality survives in the thermodynamic limit, the same covariance spectroscopy should transfer to other frustrated magnets or lattice gauge theories whose low-energy sector is a single dominant interaction renormalized by a weak conjugate field.
  • A decisive next test would be exact diagonalization or quantum Monte Carlo on a cluster whose lowest loop scale is the hexagon $g=12J_\pm^3/J_{zz}^2$ rather than the boundary four-loop $g_4$; I would expect the coefficient $B(p)$ to move from 6 toward 15 as the thermodynamic limit is approached.
  • The sign diagnostic suggests a practical phase-diagram tool: applying uniaxial stress or a field while tracking the sign of the thermal response could map zero-flux and pi-flux regions in material parameter space, an extension the paper does not develop.
  • Because the method measures a covariance between an observable and the energy rather than an energy alone, it may remain useful in disordered or partially ordered candidates where specific-heat peaks are broadened but a correlated response stays sharper.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. This paper proposes a thermodynamic probe of the ring-exchange energy scale in quantum spin ice. The authors consider the XXZ pyrochlore model with a weak transverse perturbation λX̂ and define the response γ_X = d⟨X̂⟩/dT. Using third-order perturbation theory in the transverse exchange, they derive Eq. (7): within the ring-exchange sector, γ_X = −2B(p)λ/(J±Jzz) C_ring(T) + O(λ³), with B(p)≥0, so the sign of γ_X is set by the flux sector and the ring-exchange peak shifts in a flux-dependent direction under the perturbation. They apply this result to anisotropic thermal expansion in non-Kramers Pr pyrochlores and to dM/dT in dipolar-octupolar Ce pyrochlores, and they support the mechanism with exact diagonalization on the 16-site cubic cluster, explicitly noting that the cluster's low-energy ring sector is a boundary four-loop rather than the thermodynamic hexagon.

Significance. If correct, the paper offers an experimentally accessible way to isolate the ring-exchange (photon/vison) energy scale in candidate quantum spin ice materials, addressing a long-standing challenge. The proposal is falsifiable: the proportionality, the sign law, and the peak-shift direction can be checked in measurements, and the θ dependence in the dipolar-octupolar case provides a diagnostic of the pseudospin mixing angle. Strengths include a self-contained perturbative derivation in SM S2, including explicit coefficients B(p_Eg)=15 for the hexagon and B4=6 for the 16-site cluster, and a transparent exact-diagonalization study that confirms the covariance mechanism and the sign structure. The finite-size caveat is openly disclosed. The main limitations are that the numerical check does not directly test the hexagon coefficient and that the sign convention connecting α_Eg to γ_Eg in the non-Kramers application requires an additional stated assumption about the magnetoelastic prefactor.

major comments (2)
  1. [Fig. 1 and SM S3.B / S2.D] The numerical verification of Eq. (7) in Fig. 1(b,c) and the extracted coefficient in Fig. 1(d) are performed on the 16-site periodic cluster, where the low-energy ring sector is the boundary-winding four-loop with g4 = 4J±²/Jzz and B4(p_Eg) = 6, not the thermodynamic hexagon with g = 12J±³/Jzz² and B(p_Eg) = 15. Since the material predictions are for the hexagon scale, the main-text statement that 'the proportionality relation in Eq. (7) is verified nonperturbatively by ED' should be qualified to the four-loop variant, and the paper should state explicitly that the quantitative hexagon coefficient rests on the perturbative calculation in SM S2.B rather than on the ED check.
  2. [Non-Kramers pyrochlores, Eq. (10) and SM S5.B] Equation (10) and SM Eq. (S89) give α_Eg = (g_Eg/c_eff^Eg) γ_Eg, so the sign of the measured anisotropic thermal expansion equals the sign of γ_Eg only up to the sign of the magnetoelastic prefactor g_Eg/c_eff^Eg. The abstract's claim that the sign of these signatures distinguishes the zero-flux and π-flux states is therefore not yet a direct statement about α_Eg unless the sign of the magnetoelastic coupling is known or specified; the peak-shift direction in Eq. (8) is robust to that prefactor and should be emphasized as the primary sign diagnostic in the non-Kramers channel.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Non-Kramers pyrochlores section] The sentence 'which realizes Eq. (7) at B=6 on a 16-site cubic cluster' is easily misread as the material value; please add that the thermodynamic-limit value is B=15.
  2. [Fig. 1(d) caption] The text should label the dashed lines as the cluster-specific ±6 and explicitly note that the thermodynamic-limit value would be ±15, so the reader does not confuse the extracted coefficient with the material prediction.
  3. [Fig. 1(b,c) discussion] The statement that α_Eg tracks the lower anomaly of C and 'remains proportional to it through the peak' would benefit from a quantitative statement, for example a plot of α_Eg/C over the relevant temperature range, since Eq. (7) concerns the ring-sector specific heat rather than the total specific heat.
  4. [Eq. (8)] Because κ = B(p)/(J±Jzz) and B(p) depends on the normalization of p, the normalization convention from SM Eq. (S9) should be recalled near Eq. (8) to avoid ambiguity when comparing coefficients between different probe patterns.
  5. [DO section, Fig. 2] The finite-size caveat that the θ=0.1π response is only a factor 1.4 above this cluster's own g4 should be kept in the main text, as it is currently; consider adding the corresponding thermodynamic-limit factor if a clean estimate is available.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity; central proportionality is derived from a one-coupling effective Hamiltonian and checked against full ED, not fitted.

full rationale

The load-bearing derivation is self-contained. Equation (7) follows from a chain-rule identity: within the projected one-coupling ring Hamiltonian H_ring(lambda) = g_eff(lambda) \tilde H, the conjugate operator X_ring = -\partial_lambda H_ring = -(\partial_lambda \ln g_eff) H_ring, so Cov_T(X_ring,H_ring) is exactly proportional to Var_T(H_ring) = T^2 C_ring. The nontrivial physical content is the identification of strain/field perturbations with transverse pseudospin operators that enter only through B(p), the computation of B(p_Eg)=15 (and B_4=6 on the 16-site cluster) by an explicit diagram/order-sum in SM S2, and the sign law set by J±. None of these quantities are fitted to the response being predicted; the numerical ED comparison is a check on the full XXZ spectrum, not an input. The finite-size caveat that the ED benchmark sees the boundary four-loop g4 rather than the thermodynamic hexagon g is explicitly disclosed in the Fig. 1 caption and SM S3.B and is a correctness/quantitative-extrapolation concern, not a circularity. Self-citations appear in material-context references, but the ring-exchange derivation relies on standard perturbation theory and external benchmarks (QMC, experiment), so no load-bearing self-citation chain is present.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No free parameters are fitted to data; lambda, Jpm, and x are chosen model settings. The central claim depends on the ring-exchange effective model, the transverse non-lifting form of the perturbation, and material-specific assumptions about hyperfine strain independence and a small mixing angle. The 16-site cluster introduces a boundary four-loop scale that is disclosed but weakens the numerical benchmark.

assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption The nearest-neighbor XXZ model on the pyrochlore lattice with only Jzz and Jpm captures the candidate QSI materials Pr2(Zr,Hf)2O7 and Ce2(Zr,Hf,Sn)2O7.
    Invoked throughout the introduction and SM S1.A; real materials may have additional exchanges, disorder, and phonon couplings.
  • domain assumption At low temperature the ice manifold is isolated and the only relevant effective operator is the one-coupling ring exchange H_ring = -g sum_mu W_mu.
    Third-order degenerate perturbation theory in SM S2.A; Eq. (7) is derived from this single-coupling form.
  • domain assumption The weak transverse perturbation has no matrix element inside the ice manifold and only renormalizes the ring couplings (P0 X P0 = 0).
    Sec. S2.B and S2.C; this is what makes gamma_X proportional to C_ring. It holds for Eg strain and for a purely transverse Zeeman field (theta = 0), and breaks at theta nonzero as shown in Fig. 2.
  • domain assumption The 16-site periodic cluster is a valid numerical proxy for verifying the ring-sector response.
    SM S3; the paper itself shows the cluster's low-energy scale is the boundary four-loop g4 rather than the hexagon g, so the proxy is imperfect for the thermodynamic-limit scale.
  • domain assumption The hyperfine coupling of nuclear spins is independent of strain, partial_lambda H_hf = 0.
    SM S5.C; this underlies the claim that the nuclear Schottky anomaly does not directly enter alpha_Eg.
  • domain assumption For dipolar-octupolar Ce pyrochlores the dominant Ising variable is S_x and the field mixing angle theta is small enough that the Zeeman coupling is effectively transverse.
    Eq. (12) and Fig. 2; if theta = 0.1 pi the dM/dT extremum moves a factor of 12 above g, away from the ring-exchange scale.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Thermodynamic Spectroscopy of Emergent Excitations in Quantum Spin Ice." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/7SF5IBN5

@misc{pith2026260811305,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Thermodynamic Spectroscopy of Emergent Excitations in Quantum Spin Ice},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/7SF5IBN5}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2608.11305}
}
abstract

Quantum spin ice (QSI) is a three-dimensional quantum spin liquid where fractionalized spinons interact with emergent photons. The XXZ model on the pyrochlore lattice realizes such a $U(1)$ quantum spin liquid and a number of pyrochlore magnets have been investigated as candidate materials, but the detection of emergent excitations has been a major challenge. The specific heat is expected to show the higher-energy spinon excitations and a lower-energy anomaly at the ring-exchange scale, which sets both the photon bandwidth and the energy of the emergent magnetic monopoles (or visons). In reality, the lower-energy peak is obscured by the nuclear Schottky anomaly in non-Kramers Pr-based systems, while it is not clearly resolved from the spinon contributions in Ce-based dipolar-octupolar systems. In this work, we propose a novel thermodynamic probe of the elusive ring-exchange energy scale. We show that in the presence of a weak perturbation coupled to the transverse component of the pseudospin degrees of freedom, the temperature derivative of an observable conjugate to such a weak perturbing force is highly sensitive to the ring-exchange energy scale. Using this scheme, it is shown that the difference between thermal expansion coefficients along the [100] and [010] directions should show a peak at the ring-exchange energy scale for non-Kramers QSI. Similarly, the temperature derivative of the magnetization, $dM/dT$, of dipolar-octupolar pyrochlores under a weak magnetic field can also detect the same signal. Moreover, the sign of these signatures distinguishes the zero-flux and $\pi$-flux QSI states.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2608.11305 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. it sits a factor of 12 above g. The position of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

86 extracted references · 61 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Hermele, M

    M. Hermele, M. P. A. Fisher, and L. Balents, Pyrochlore photons: The U(1) spin liquid in aS= 1 2 three- dimensional frustrated magnet, Phys. Rev. B69, 064404 (2004)

    2004

  2. [2]

    M. J. P. Gingras and P. A. McClarty, Quantum spin ice: a search for gapless quantum spin liquids in pyrochlore magnets, Rep. Prog. Phys.77, 056501 (2014)

    2014

  3. [3]

    J. G. Rau and M. J. P. Gingras, Frustrated quantum rare- 6 earth pyrochlores, Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys.10, 357 (2019)

    2019

  4. [4]

    O. I. Motrunich and T. Senthil, Exotic order in simple models of bosonic systems, Phys. Rev. Lett.89, 277004 (2002)

    2002

  5. [5]

    Moessner and S

    R. Moessner and S. L. Sondhi, Three-dimensional resonating-valence-bond liquids and their excitations, Phys. Rev. B68, 184512 (2003)

    2003

  6. [6]

    Wen, Artificial light and quantum order in systems of screened dipoles, Phys

    X.-G. Wen, Artificial light and quantum order in systems of screened dipoles, Phys. Rev. B68, 115413 (2003)

    work page 2003

  7. [7]

    Savary and L

    L. Savary and L. Balents, Coulombic quantum liquids in spin-1/2 pyrochlores, Phys. Rev. Lett.108, 037202 (2012)

    2012

  8. [8]

    Savary and L

    L. Savary and L. Balents, Spin liquid regimes at nonzero temperature in quantum spin ice, Phys. Rev. B87, 205130 (2013)

    2013

Show all 86 references
  1. [9]

    Benton, O

    O. Benton, O. Sikora, and N. Shannon, Seeing the light: Experimental signatures of emergent electromagnetism in a quantum spin ice, Phys. Rev. B86, 075154 (2012)

    2012

  2. [10]

    S. D. Pace, S. C. Morampudi, R. Moessner, and C. R. Laumann, Emergent fine structure constant of quantum spin ice is large, Phys. Rev. Lett.127, 117205 (2021)

    2021

  3. [11]

    Castelnovo, R

    C. Castelnovo, R. Moessner, and S. L. Sondhi, Magnetic monopoles in spin ice, Nature451, 42 (2008)

    2008

  4. [12]

    Castelnovo, R

    C. Castelnovo, R. Moessner, and S. L. Sondhi, Spin ice, fractionalization, and topological order, Annu. Rev. Con- dens. Matter Phys.3, 35 (2012)

    2012

  5. [13]

    S. Lee, S. Onoda, and L. Balents, Generic quantum spin ice, Phys. Rev. B86, 104412 (2012)

    2012

  6. [14]

    Benton, L

    O. Benton, L. D. C. Jaubert, R. R. P. Singh, J. Oitmaa, and N. Shannon, Quantum spin ice with frustrated trans- verse exchange: From aπ-flux phase to a nematic quan- tum spin liquid, Phys. Rev. Lett.121, 067201 (2018)

    2018

  7. [15]

    L. E. Chern, F. Desrochers, Y. B. Kim, and C. Castel- novo, Pseudofermion functional renormalization group study of dipolar-octupolar pyrochlore magnets, Phys. Rev. B109, 184421 (2024)

    2024

  8. [16]

    Schaden, M

    Y. Schaden, M. G. Gonzalez, and J. Reuther, Phase diagram of the XXZ pyrochlore model from pseudo- Majorana functional renormalization group, Phys. Rev. B111, 134442 (2025)

    2025

  9. [17]

    Banerjee, S

    A. Banerjee, S. V. Isakov, K. Damle, and Y. B. Kim, Un- usual liquid state of hard-core bosons on the pyrochlore lattice, Phys. Rev. Lett.100, 047208 (2008)

    2008

  10. [18]

    Shannon, O

    N. Shannon, O. Sikora, F. Pollmann, K. Penc, and P. Fulde, Quantum ice: A quantum Monte Carlo study, Phys. Rev. Lett.108, 067204 (2012)

    2012

  11. [19]

    Kato and S

    Y. Kato and S. Onoda, Numerical evidence of quan- tum melting of spin ice: Quantum-to-classical crossover, Phys. Rev. Lett.115, 077202 (2015)

    2015

  12. [20]

    Huang, Y

    C.-J. Huang, Y. Deng, Y. Wan, and Z. Y. Meng, Dynam- ics of topological excitations in a model quantum spin ice, Phys. Rev. Lett.120, 167202 (2018)

    2018

  13. [21]

    C. Zhou, Z. Zhou, F. Desrochers, Y. B. Kim, and Z. Y. Meng, Quantum Fisher information as a thermal probe in frustrated magnets through insights from quantum spin ice, Nat. Commun. 10.1038/s41467-026-74589-6 (2026)

    2026 doi

  14. [22]

    See the Supplemental Material appended below for the weak-field derivation ofB µ(p) and the acoustic/optical sublattice kernel, the exact band extraction and zero- transport projection, the photon- and spinon-window measurements and the acoustic-cancellation mechanism, the pow...

  15. [23]

    Bleaney, Enhanced nuclear magnetism, Physica69, 317 (1973)

    B. Bleaney, Enhanced nuclear magnetism, Physica69, 317 (1973)

    1973

  16. [24]

    Kimura, S

    K. Kimura, S. Nakatsuji, J.-J. Wen, C. Broholm, M. B. Stone, E. Nishibori, and H. Sawa, Quantum fluctuations in spin-ice-like Pr2Zr2O7, Nat. Commun.4, 1934 (2013)

    2013

  17. [25]

    Bonville, S

    P. Bonville, S. Guitteny, A. Gukasov, I. Mirebeau, S. Pe- tit, C. Decorse, M. Ciomaga Hatnean, and G. Balakrish- nan, Magnetic properties and crystal field in Pr 2Zr2O7, Phys. Rev. B94, 134428 (2016)

    2016

  18. [26]

    Gronemann, S

    J. Gronemann, S. Chattopadhyay, T. Gottschall, E. Os- mic, A. T. M. N. Islam, V. K. Anand, B. Lake, H. Kaneko, H. Suzuki, J. Wosnitza, and T. Her- rmannsd¨ orfer, Impact of hyperfine contributions on the ground state of spin-ice compounds, Phys. Rev. B108, 214412 (2023)

    2023

  19. [27]

    H. W. J. Bl¨ ote, R. F. Wielinga, and W. J. Huiskamp, Heat-capacity measurements on rare-earth double oxides R2M2O7, Physica43, 549 (1969)

    1969

  20. [28]

    V. K. Anand, L. Opherden, J. Xu, D. T. Adroja, A. T. M. N. Islam, T. Herrmannsd¨ orfer, J. Hornung, R. Sch¨ onemann, M. Uhlarz, H. C. Walker, N. Casati, and B. Lake, Physical properties of the candidate quan- tum spin-ice system Pr 2Hf2O7, Phys. Rev. B94, 144415 (2016)

    2016

  21. [29]

    Y. Luo, B. R. Ortiz, M. Knudtson, S. D. Wilson, J. Liu, B. A. Frandsen, S. A. Chen, M. D. Frontzek, A. A. Podlesnyak, J. A. M. Paddison, and A. A. Aczel, Disorder-induced proximate quantum spin ice phase in Pr2Sn2O7, arXiv:2508.19248 10.48550/arXiv.2508.19248 (2025)

    2025 doi arXiv

  22. [30]

    Gaudet, E

    J. Gaudet, E. M. Smith, J. Dudemaine, J. Beare, C. R. C. Buhariwalla, N. P. Butch, M. B. Stone, A. I. Kolesnikov, G. Xu, D. R. Yahne,et al., Quantum spin ice dynamics in the dipole-octupole pyrochlore magnet Ce 2Zr2O7, Phys. Rev. Lett.122, 187201 (2019)

    2019

  23. [31]

    Sibille, N

    R. Sibille, N. Gauthier, E. Lhotel, V. Por´ ee, V. Pom- jakushin, R. A. Ewings, T. G. Perring, J. Ollivier, A. Wildes, C. Ritter, T. C. Hansen, D. A. Keen, G. J. Nilsen, L. Keller, S. Petit, and T. Fennell, A quantum liquid of magnetic octupoles on the pyrochlore lattice, Nat....

    2020

  24. [32]

    D. R. Yahne, B. Placke, R. Sch¨ afer, O. Benton, R. Moess- ner, M. Powell, J. W. Kolis, C. M. Pasco, A. F. May, M. D. Frontzek,et al., Dipolar spin ice regime proxi- mate to an all-in-all-out N´ eel ground state in the dipolar- octupolar pyrochlore Ce2Sn2O7, Phys. Rev. X14, 01...

    2024

  25. [33]

    Por´ ee, H

    V. Por´ ee, H. Yan, F. Desrochers, S. Petit, E. Lhotel, M. Appel, J. Ollivier, Y. B. Kim, A. H. Nevidomskyy, and R. Sibille, Evidence for fractional matter coupled to an emergent gauge field in a quantum spin ice, Nat. Phys. 21, 83 (2025)

    2025

  26. [34]

    B. Yuan, M. Powell, X. Liu, J. Ni, E. M. Smith, R. Sch¨ afer, R. Moessner, F. Ye, J. Dudemaine, A. D. Bianchi, J. W. Kolis, and B. D. Gaulin, Observa- tion of dipolar spin-ice-like correlations in the quan- tum spin ice candidate Ce 2Sn2O7, arXiv:2601.20766 10.48550/arXiv.2601...

    2026 doi arXiv

  27. [35]

    B. Gao, T. Chen, D. W. Tam, C.-L. Huang, K. Sasmal, D. T. Adroja, F. Ye, H. Cao, G. Sala, M. B. Stone,et al., Experimental signatures of a three-dimensional quantum spin liquid in effective spin-1/2 Ce 2Zr2O7 pyrochlore, Nat. Phys.15, 1052 (2019)

    2019

  28. [36]

    E. M. Smith, O. Benton, D. R. Yahne, B. Placke, 7 R. Sch¨ afer, J. Gaudet, J. Dudemaine, A. Fitterman, J. Beare, A. R. Wildes,et al., Case for a U(1) π quantum spin liquid ground state in the dipole-octupole pyrochlore Ce2Zr2O7, Phys. Rev. X12, 021015 (2022)

    2022

  29. [37]

    B. Gao, F. Desrochers, D. W. Tam, D. M. Kirschbaum, P. Steffens, A. Hiess, D. H. Nguyen, Y. Su, S.-W. Cheong, S. Paschen, Y. B. Kim, and P. Dai, Neutron scattering and thermodynamic evidence for emergent photons and fractionalization in a pyrochlore spin ice, Nat. Phys.21, 1203 (2025)

    2025

  30. [38]

    B. Gao, Z. Zhou, T. Zhang, A. Podlesnyak, S.-W. Cheong, Y. B. Kim, and P. Dai, Spectroscopic demar- cation of emergent photons and spinons in a dipolar- octupolar quantum spin liquid, Phys. Rev. Lett.136, 256703 (2026)

    2026

  31. [39]

    E. M. Smith, J. Dudemaine, B. Placke, R. Sch¨ afer, D. R. Yahne, T. DeLazzer, A. Fitterman, J. Beare, J. Gaudet, C. R. C. Buhariwalla, A. Podlesnyak, G. Xu, J. P. Clancy, R. Movshovich, G. M. Luke, K. A. Ross, R. Moessner, O. Benton, A. D. Bianchi, and B. D. Gaulin, Quan- tum ...

    2023

  32. [40]

    Desrochers and Y

    F. Desrochers and Y. B. Kim, Finite-temperature dynam- ics in 0-flux andπ-flux quantum spin ice: Self-consistent exclusive boson approach, Phys. Rev. B109, 144410 (2024)

    2024

  33. [41]

    E. M. Smith, A. Fitterman, R. Sch¨ afer, B. Placke, A. Woods, S. Lee, S. H.-Y. Huang, J. Beare, S. Sharma, D. Chatterjee, C. Balz, M. B. Stone, A. I. Kolesnikov, A. R. Wildes, E. Kermarrec, G. M. Luke, O. Benton, R. Moessner, R. Movshovich, A. D. Bianchi, and B. D. Gaulin, Two...

    2025

  34. [42]

    Por´ ee, A

    V. Por´ ee, A. Bhardwaj, E. Lhotel, S. Petit, N. Gauthier, H. Yan, V. Pomjakushin, J. Ollivier, J. A. Quilliam, A. H. Nevidomskyy,et al., Dipolar-octupolar correlations and hierarchy of exchange interactions in Ce 2Hf2O7, Phys. Rev. B112, L180404 (2025)

    2025

  35. [43]

    Canals and C

    B. Canals and C. Lacroix, Pyrochlore antiferromagnet: A three-dimensional quantum spin liquid, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 2933 (1998)

    1998

  36. [44]

    Sch¨ afer, I

    R. Sch¨ afer, I. Hagym´ asi, R. Moessner, and D. J. Luitz, PyrochloreS= 1 2 Heisenberg antiferromagnet at finite temperature, Phys. Rev. B102, 054408 (2020)

    2020

  37. [45]

    Wei and S

    C. Wei and S. H. Curnoe, Exact diagonalization for a 16-site spin-1/2 pyrochlore cluster, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter35, 295802 (2023)

    2023

  38. [46]

    Wei and S

    C. Wei and S. H. Curnoe, Symmetry considerations in exact diagonalization: spin-1/2 pyrochlore magnets, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor.57, 435301 (2024)

    2024

  39. [47]

    Sanders and C

    A. Sanders and C. Castelnovo, Vison crystal in quantum spin ice on the breathing pyrochlore lattice, Phys. Rev. B109, 094426 (2024)

    2024

  40. [48]

    Sanders, H

    A. Sanders, H. Yan, C. Castelnovo, and A. H. Nevidomskyy, Experimentally tunable qed in dipolar- octupolar quantum spin ice (2024), arXiv:2312.11641 [cond-mat.str-el]

    2024 arXiv

  41. [49]

    Onoda and Y

    S. Onoda and Y. Tanaka, Quantum melting of spin ice: Emergent cooperative quadrupole and chirality, Phys. Rev. Lett.105, 047201 (2010)

    2010

  42. [50]

    Onimaru and H

    T. Onimaru and H. Kusunose, Exotic quadrupolar phe- nomena in non-Kramers doublet systems — The cases of PrT2Zn20 (T= Ir, Rh) and PrT 2Al20 (T= V, Ti) —, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn.85, 082002 (2016)

    2016

  43. [51]

    A. S. Patri, M. Hosoi, S. Lee, and Y. B. Kim, Theory of magnetostriction for multipolar quantum spin ice in py- rochlore materials, Phys. Rev. Research2, 033015 (2020)

    2020

  44. [52]

    Simon, A

    S. Simon, A. S. Patri, and Y. B. Kim, Ultrasound de- tection of emergent photons in generic quantum spin ice, Phys. Rev. B106, 064427 (2022)

    2022

  45. [53]

    A. Seth, S. Bhattacharjee, and R. Moessner, Probing emergent QED in quantum spin ice via Raman scattering of phonons: Shallow inelastic scattering and pair produc- tion, Phys. Rev. B106, 054507 (2022)

    2022

  46. [54]

    N. Tang, Y. Gritsenko, K. Kimura, S. Bhattacharjee, A. Sakai, M. Fu, H. Takeda, H. Man, K. Sugawara, Y. Matsumoto,et al., Spin–orbital liquid state and liquid–gas metamagnetic transition on a pyrochlore lat- tice, Nat. Phys.19, 92 (2023)

    2023

  47. [55]

    A. S. Patri, M. Hosoi, and Y. B. Kim, Distinguishing dipolar and octupolar quantum spin ices using contrast- ing magnetostriction signatures, Phys. Rev. Research2, 023253 (2020)

    2020

  48. [56]

    Huang, G

    Y.-P. Huang, G. Chen, and M. Hermele, Quantum spin ices and topological phases from dipolar-octupolar dou- blets on the pyrochlore lattice, Phys. Rev. Lett.112, 167203 (2014)

    2014

  49. [57]

    Li and G

    Y.-D. Li and G. Chen, Symmetry enriched U(1) topolog- ical orders for dipole-octupole doublets on a pyrochlore lattice, Phys. Rev. B95, 041106 (2017)

    2017

  50. [58]

    Z. Zhou, F. Desrochers, and Y. B. Kim, Magnetic field response of dipolar-octupolar quantum spin ice, Phys. Rev. B110, 174441 (2024)

    2024

  51. [59]

    Desrochers, L

    F. Desrochers, L. E. Chern, and Y. B. Kim, Competing U(1) andZ 2 dipolar-octupolar quantum spin liquids on the pyrochlore lattice: Application to Ce 2Zr2O7, Phys. Rev. B105, 035149 (2022)

    2022

  52. [60]

    Zhou and Y

    Z. Zhou and Y. B. Kim, Towards a global phase diagram of Ce-based dipolar-octupolar pyrochlore magnets under magnetic fields, Phys. Rev. B112, L060407 (2025)

    2025

  53. [61]

    Bhardwaj, S

    A. Bhardwaj, S. Zhang, H. Yan, R. Moessner, A. H. Nevidomskyy, and H. J. Changlani, Sleuthing out ex- otic quantum spin liquidity in the pyrochlore magnet Ce2Zr2O7, npj Quantum Mater.7, 51 (2022)

    2022

  54. [62]

    E. M. Smith, R. Sch¨ afer, J. Dudemaine, B. Placke, B. Yuan, Z. Morgan, F. Ye, R. Moessner, O. Benton, A. D. Bianchi, and B. D. Gaulin, Single-crystal diffuse neutron scattering study of the dipole-octupole quantum spin-ice candidate Ce2Zr2O7: No apparent octupolar cor- relati...

    2025

  55. [63]

    K. A. Ross, L. Savary, B. D. Gaulin, and L. Balents, Quantum excitations in quantum spin ice, Phys. Rev. X 1, 021002 (2011)

    2011

  56. [64]

    Applegate, N

    R. Applegate, N. R. Hayre, R. R. P. Singh, T. Lin, A. G. R. Day, and M. J. P. Gingras, Vindication of Yb2Ti2O7 as a model exchange quantum spin ice, Phys. Rev. Lett.109, 097205 (2012)

    2012

  57. [65]

    N. R. Hayre, K. A. Ross, R. Applegate, T. Lin, R. R. P. Singh, B. D. Gaulin, and M. J. P. Gingras, Thermody- namic properties of Yb2Ti2O7 pyrochlore as a function of temperature and magnetic field: Validation of a quantum spin ice exchange Hamiltonian, Phys. Rev. B87, 184423 (2013)

    2013

  58. [66]

    Desrochers, L

    F. Desrochers, L. E. Chern, and Y. B. Kim, Symmetry fractionalization in the gauge mean-field theory of quan- 8 tum spin ice, Phys. Rev. B107, 064404 (2023)

    2023

  59. [67]

    Jaubert and P

    L. Jaubert and P. Holdsworth, Signature of magnetic monopole and Dirac string dynamics in spin ice, Nature Physics5, 258 (2009)

    2009

  60. [68]

    Fennell, P

    T. Fennell, P. P. Deen, A. R. Wildes, K. Schmalzl, D. Prabhakaran, A. T. Boothroyd, R. J. Aldus, D. F. Mc- Morrow, and S. T. Bramwell, Magnetic Coulomb phase in the spin ice Ho 2Ti2O7, Science326, 415 (2009)

    2009

  61. [69]

    D. J. P. Morris, D. A. Tennant, S. A. Grigera, B. Klemke, C. Castelnovo, R. Moessner, C. Czternasty, M. Meissner, K. C. Rule, J.-U. Hoffmann,et al., Dirac strings and magnetic monopoles in the spin ice Dy 2Ti2O7, Science 326, 411 (2009)

    2009

  62. [70]

    Petit, E

    S. Petit, E. Lhotel, B. Canals, M. Ciomaga Hatnean, J. Ollivier, H. Mutka, E. Ressouche, A. R. Wildes, M. R. Lees, and G. Balakrishnan, Observation of magnetic frag- mentation in spin ice, Nat. Phys.12, 746 (2016)

    2016

  63. [71]

    Sch¨ afer, B

    R. Sch¨ afer, B. Placke, O. Benton, and R. Moessner, Abundance of hard-hexagon crystals in the quantum py- rochlore antiferromagnet, Phys. Rev. Lett.131, 096702 (2023)

    2023

  64. [72]

    Magnetic monopole

    G. Chen, “Magnetic monopole” condensation of the pyrochlore ice U(1) quantum spin liquid: Application to Pr 2Ir2O7 and Yb 2Ti2O7, Phys. Rev. B94, 205107 (2016)

    2016

  65. [73]

    Chen, Spectral periodicity of the spinon continuum in quantum spin ice, Phys

    G. Chen, Spectral periodicity of the spinon continuum in quantum spin ice, Phys. Rev. B96, 085136 (2017)

    2017

  66. [74]

    Udagawa and R

    M. Udagawa and R. Moessner, Spectrum of itinerant fractional excitations in quantum spin ice, Phys. Rev. Lett.122, 117201 (2019)

    2019

  67. [75]

    Desrochers and Y

    F. Desrochers and Y. B. Kim, Spectroscopic signatures of fractionalization in octupolar quantum spin ice, Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 066502 (2024)

    2024

  68. [76]

    M. S. Dresselhaus, G. Dresselhaus, and A. Jorio,Group Theory: Application to the Physics of Condensed Matter (Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2008)

    2008

  69. [77]

    A. S. Patri, A. Sakai, S. Lee, A. Paramekanti, S. Nakat- suji, and Y. B. Kim, Unveiling hidden multipolar or- ders with magnetostriction, Nature Communications10, 10.1038/s41467-019-11913-3 (2019)

    2019 doi

  70. [78]

    Onoda and Y

    S. Onoda and Y. Tanaka, Quantum fluctuations in the effective pseudospin- 1 2 model for magnetic pyrochlore ox- ides, Phys. Rev. B83, 094411 (2011)

    2011

  71. [79]

    N. Tang, M. Gen, M. Rotter, H. Man, K. Mat- suhira, A. Matsuo, K. Kindo, A. Ikeda, Y. H. Matsuda, P. Gegenwart,et al., Crystal field magnetostriction of spin ice under ultrahigh magnetic fields, Phys. Rev. B 110, 214414 (2024)

    2024

  72. [80]

    K. T. K. Chung, S. Petit, J. Robert, and P. McClarty, Geometrically frustrated quadrupoles on the pyrochlore lattice and generalized spin liquids, arXiv:2506.19908 10.48550/arXiv.2506.19908 (2025)

    2025 doi arXiv

  73. [81]

    J.-J. Wen, S. M. Koohpayeh, K. A. Ross, B. A. Trump, T. M. McQueen, K. Kimura, S. Nakatsuji, Y. Qiu, D. M. Pajerowski, J. R. D. Copley,et al., Disordered route to the Coulomb quantum spin liquid: Random transverse fields on spin ice in Pr 2Zr2O7, Phys. Rev. Lett.118, 107206 (2017)

    2017

  74. [82]

    Savary and L

    L. Savary and L. Balents, Disorder-induced quantum spin liquid in spin ice pyrochlores, Phys. Rev. Lett.118, 087203 (2017)

    2017

  75. [83]

    Benton, Instabilities of a U(1) quantum spin liquid in disordered non-Kramers pyrochlores, Phys

    O. Benton, Instabilities of a U(1) quantum spin liquid in disordered non-Kramers pyrochlores, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 037203 (2018)

    2018

  76. [84]

    Thermodynamic Spectroscopy of Emergent Excitations in Quantum Spin Ice

    M. V. Marinho and E. C. Andrade, Quantum spin liquids stabilized by disorder in non-Kramers pyrochlores, Ann. Phys. (Berlin)538, e00552 (2026). 9 Supplemental Material for “Thermodynamic Spectroscopy of Emergent Excitations in Quantum Spin Ice” Zhengbang Zhou, Tony An, and Yon...

    2026

  77. [86]

    Equivalently, γR = 1 T 2 CovT (OR,H el) + 1 T 2 CovT (OR,H hf).(S92) There is therefore no additive contribution proportional to Var(Hhf)/T 2, i.e

    The generalized force conjugate toλis then −∂λH=−∂ λHel =OR,(S91) so the nuclear Hamiltonian produces no independent generalized-force or stress term. Equivalently, γR = 1 T 2 CovT (OR,H el) + 1 T 2 CovT (OR,H hf).(S92) There is therefore no additive contribution proportional ...

  78. [100]

    From its definition,α Eg is not sensi- tive to the nuclear 141Pr spins

    and [010] axes [22, 51, 55] αEg = d dT ∆L L [100] − ∆L L [010] ,(11) where ∆L/L| ˆℓ denotes the relative length change along the ˆℓdirection. From its definition,α Eg is not sensi- tive to the nuclear 141Pr spins. The hyperfine interac- tion projected onto the non-Kramers doub...

    2023

Pith tools

Reviewed August 15, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.