Finiteness of singular orbits of pseudo-Anosov flows

Lily Qiao Li

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 25 references

Finiteness of singular orbits of pseudo-Anosov flows

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-15 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A closed atoroidal 3-manifold admits only finitely many isotopy classes of links as singular orbits of pseudo-Anosov flows.

desk verdict A plausible, significant finiteness theorem whose written proof has a real gap in Lemma 3.3; worth refereeing, but the gap needs to be addressed before the result is relied upon. read the letter →

arxiv 2608.11377 v1 pith:LLJU2LTP submitted 2026-08-11 math.GT math.DS

Lily Qiao Li This is my paper · ORCID

classification math.GTmath.DS MSC 57K3037D20

keywords pseudo-AnosovflowssingularorbitsdegeneracycurvesessentiallaminationsgutsdecompositionnormalsurfacesKneserformatoroidal3-manifolds

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Pseudo-Anosov flows are flows on 3-manifolds with expanding and contracting directions, modeled away from finitely many periodic singular orbits on suspensions of pseudo-Anosov surface homeomorphisms. This paper proves that on any closed 3-manifold $M$ containing no essential embedded tori, only finitely many isotopy classes of links can occur as the singular orbits of such flows. It also proves finiteness for the associated degeneracy curves and for the possible gut regions of the stable laminations, once $M$ is equipped with a fixed triangulation. The result is a step toward the Finiteness Conjecture, which predicts that every closed 3-manifold carries only finitely many transitive Anosov and pseudo-Anosov flows up to orbit equivalence.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing mechanism is the pairing of the guts decomposition with a fixed triangulation of $M$. The stable lamination $\Lambda^s$ is Denjoy-split from the stable foliation, and its complement is written as a compact gut $G$ glued to an interstitial $I$-bundle along interstitial annuli. The triangulation cuts each complementary region into polyhedral blocks, of which only finitely many are 'special' (non-$I$-bundle) blocks. Lemma 3.3 asserts that the interstitial annuli can be isotoped onto the 2-skeleton so that the gut is a finite union of blocks; Algorithm 3.5 then removes $I$-bundle blocks until every patch of an interstitial annulus borders a special block, and Lemma 3.7 bounds the number of such patches in minimal position. For Theorem B, the additional machinery is the Kneser branched surface carrying all stable laminations and the Floyd–Oertel weight equations: if gut boundary areas grew without bound while the interstitial annuli stayed fixed, normalized weight vectors would converge to a measured lamination of Euler characteristic zero carried by the branched surface, hence to an embedded torus, contradicting that the branched surface carries no torus.

What would settle it

The most direct refutation of Theorem A would be a single closed atoroidal 3-manifold with an infinite sequence of pseudo-Anosov flows whose singular orbit links are pairwise non-isotopic. A narrower test of the proof would inspect an explicit normalized stable lamination on a small closed hyperbolic 3-manifold and check whether Lemma 3.3's expansion produces a gut with infinitely many blocks in one 3-simplex; such an example would break the claimed reduction.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is Theorem A: if $M$ is a closed atoroidal 3-manifold, then the set of isotopy classes of links that arise as singular orbits of pseudo-Anosov flows on $M$ is finite, and the set of isotopy classes of their degeneracy curves is also finite. Theorem B adds that, for a triangulation $\tau$ obtained from Gabai's Kneser normal form theorem, only finitely many triangulated solid tori can arise as gut regions of stable laminations of pseudo-Anosov flows on $M$. The proof starts from the stable foliation of an arbitrary pseudo-Anosov flow, Denjoy-splits it into a nowhere dense essential lamination $\Lambda^s$, and normalizes $\Lambda^s$ to the fixed triangulation. The guts decomposition of the complement is then aligned with the triangulation's combinatorial blocks, and after an inductive minimal-position procedure one is left with finitely many possible interstitial annuli. Since degeneracy curves are isotopic to core curves of interstitial annuli, and singular orbits are cabled by degeneracy curves, the finiteness statements follow. A corollary reduces the Finiteness Conjecture for pseudo-Anosov flows on closed atoroidal manifolds to finiteness of Anosov flows on torus-boundary manifolds with fixed degeneracy slopes.

Load-bearing premise

The combinatorial reduction rests on Lemma 3.3, which asserts that the interstitial annuli can be chosen so that the gut is built from finitely many blocks of the fixed triangulation; the proof's compactness step assumes that infinitely many small gut pieces cannot accumulate at a point inside the compact manifold, and that is exactly the point needing proof.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

For each closed atoroidal $M$ there is a finite candidate list $\mathcal{S}(M)$ of link types; any pseudo-Anosov flow on $M$ has singular orbit link in this list.
The degeneracy curves of all pseudo-Anosov flows on $M$ lie in a finite set, so the cabling data around singular orbits is uniformly constrained.
There is a uniform bound on the length of singular orbits measured in the fixed triangulation, by Lackenby's bound on core curves of triangulated solid tori (Corollary 4.1).
The Finiteness Conjecture for pseudo-Anosov flows on closed atoroidal manifolds reduces to a boundary problem: finitely many Anosov flows on an atoroidal manifold with torus boundary and fixed degeneracy slopes (Corollary 1.2).

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

Going beyond the paper, this normalization suggests a route to compute the finite list $\mathcal{S}(M)$ explicitly for small manifolds once an effective version of the triangulation is found; the proof is already combinatorial after that triangulation is fixed.
A testable extension is to compare the finite candidate list with the set of links realized by known constructions such as veering triangulations or contact and Reeb data; a mismatch would indicate either an ineffective enumeration or a new restriction on which pseudo-Anosov flows exist.
If Lemma 3.3 is repaired, the same argument would produce a finite branched surface carrying all stable laminations of pseudo-Anosov flows on $M$, which would give a stronger structural finiteness statement than the link-level theorem.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

Colleague,

The thing to know: this is a real theorem attempt, not a toy. If Theorem A is right, it is the first finiteness statement for singular orbit link types on arbitrary closed atoroidal 3-manifolds, and Corollary 1.2 gives a clean reduction of the Finiteness Conjecture to boundary-sloped Anosov flows. The idea—use Gabai's Kneser normal form to put the Denjoy-split stable lamination in a fixed triangulation, then align the guts decomposition with the combinatorial block decomposition, then count possible interstitial annuli—is sound in outline and gives a genuinely finite combinatorial picture. The paper is clearly written and the author is upfront about the tools used.

The trouble is Lemma 3.3, and it is not minor. The proof of finiteness of gut blocks in σ∩G1 passes to a limit x of points in distinct components and says "a small neighborhood of x in σ should be contained in G1" because G1 is compact. That is false: compact sets can have infinitely many components accumulating at a boundary point, and G1 is closed in the complementary region, not open. This is the bridge to the finite block decomposition, and it is used in Lemma 3.6 and Lemma 3.7. Without it, the claimed finiteness of gut blocks does not follow. Lemma 3.7 also defers a key count to an unprinted table—worth asking the author to spell out. The JSJ step at the end of Theorem A is terse; I would want a precise statement about why the collection of essential tori in the complement of the degeneracy curves is finite (or a reference to the right JSJ statement). Also note Gabai's theorem is stated for orientable M, so either orientability is needed or a separate word is needed for the nonorientable case.

I do not see circularity. The author brings in substantial external tools (Gabai, Floyd-Oertel, Lackenby) and the proof does not assume the conclusion.

Bottom line: the central claim is plausible and the strategy is credible, but the written proof has a load-bearing gap. This is exactly the kind of paper that should go to peer review, not be desk-rejected—a knowledgeable referee might help patch Lemma 3.3 or find a counterexample. I would not rely on it yet, but I would read the next version carefully.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper proves that on any closed atoroidal 3-manifold M, only finitely many isotopy classes of links can occur as the singular orbits of pseudo-Anosov flows, and only finitely many isotopy classes of degeneracy curves occur. The strategy is to Denjoy-split the stable foliation, normalize the resulting lamination to a fixed Gabai triangulation, and align the guts decomposition with the triangulation so that all possible gut regions and interstitial annuli belong to a finite combinatorial list. A branched-surface argument is used to rule out unboundedly complex guts. The paper also states a finiteness theorem for gut regions as triangulated solid tori.

Significance. If the proof can be completed, Theorem A is a substantial step toward the finiteness conjecture for pseudo-Anosov flows: it reduces the question to finitely many orbit-link candidates, and the author notes that Barthelmé–Tsang–Zung rely on this result. The use of Gabai's Kneser normal form and Floyd–Oertel branched-surface equations is well aligned with the problem. The paper would be significantly more convincing if the claims currently deferred to figures or unprinted tables were proved explicitly.

major comments (4)

[Lemma 3.3 (Section 3)] The proof of Lemma 3.3 argues by contradiction that σ∩G1 has finitely many components by passing to a convergent subsequence x_k→x and asserting that a small neighborhood of x in σ is contained in G1 because G1 is compact. This inference is not valid: G1 is a closed subset of the closed complement, not an open subset of σ, and the limit x may lie on ∂G1, for instance on an interstitial annulus or on an accumulating boundary of G1. A compact set can have infinitely many components accumulating at a boundary point. The claimed finiteness of the blocks of G1 is therefore unproved. Since Lemma 3.6 (termination of Algorithm 3.5) and Lemma 3.7 (finiteness of interstitial annuli) both rely on Lemma 3.3, the reduction of the guts decomposition to finitely many combinatorial blocks is not established by the written proof.
[Lemma 3.7 (Section 3)] The proof asserts that on each face of a 3-simplex there are at most two quadrilateral patches of minimal interstitial annuli 'because each patch must bound a special block, and checking against the table of special blocks...' No table is provided, and Figure 4 does not list the patch-incidence data needed to verify this assertion. The finiteness of possible minimal interstitial annuli, and hence of degeneracy curves, depends on this unstated combinatorial check. Please include the table or give a complete proof of the claimed bound.
[Proof of Theorem A (Section 3)] The final step of Theorem A concludes that there are finitely many essential tori in M\ν({c_i}) 'by the JSJ decomposition.' This does not follow in general: a compact 3-manifold with toral boundary can contain infinitely many pairwise non-isotopic essential tori, for example in Seifert fibered pieces whose base orbifold has infinite mapping class group. The argument needs an additional reason that the particular tori bounding the singular orbits are finite in number, for instance that they are all parallel to boundary components or constrained by the fixed degeneracy curves.
[Proof of Theorem B (Section 4)] The proof uses several unstated facts: the existence of the finite collection of essential branched surfaces carrying all stable laminations (Gabai's result is stated only as a triangulation theorem in Theorem 2.3), the assertion that the branched surface Σ does not carry tori, and the step from an extremal rational solution to Aw=0 to an embedded torus with χ=0. Without precise statements and references for these points, the contradiction is not rigorously established. At minimum, the linearity of Euler characteristic for carried laminations and the no-sphere-leaves argument need a citation or proof, and the passage from extremal rays to embedded surfaces must be justified.

minor comments (5)

[Throughout] Several passages contain typos: 'close' should be 'closed' (for example in Theorem 2.3 and Definition 2.2), and 'pseudo Anosov' in the title should be hyphenated.
[Section 3, beginning] The notation 'C = M3−Λ2' is ambiguous; please write C = M \ Λ or explicitly define the closed complement of the lamination being used.
[Lemma 3.6 (Section 3)] In the casework, the statement that if γ is the meridian then 'the corresponding singular orbit has only 2 prongs' is asserted without proof; a short justification would help the reader.
[Section 4 (Theorem B)] The normalization x(i) = w(i)/||w(i)|| uses an unspecified norm; the standard ℓ^1 norm on the weight space should be stated.
[Figure 4 (Section 3)] The enumeration of blocks in Figure 4 is stated to be exhaustive, but the sense in which it is exhaustive is not explained; please state whether this is a finite check and how the figure was obtained.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the finiteness of singular orbit links is derived from independent external theorems (Gabai's Kneser normal form, Floyd-Oertel branched surface theory, JSJ decomposition), not from the conclusion being proved.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain is: normalize each Denjoy-split stable lamination to Gabai's fixed triangulation; decompose complementary regions into polyhedral blocks; choose interstitial annuli on the 2-skeleton; delete I-bundle blocks until minimal position; invoke the finite patch combinatorics of minimal interstitial annuli; and finally convert finiteness of degeneracy curves into finiteness of singular orbit link types via the cable relationship and JSJ decomposition. None of these steps assumes the theorem's conclusion. The finiteness of gut blocks in Lemma 3.3 is attempted through a contradiction/compactness argument; whether that argument is valid is a correctness issue, not circularity. A failure of compactness would be an invalid inference, not a tautological reduction of the target result to its inputs. The paper's essential reliance on [Gab99], [FO84], and the JSJ decomposition cites external mathematical results whose assumptions do not include the finiteness of singular orbits or degeneracy curves. The fact that one cited theorem is due to the author's advisor does not make the citation load-bearing circularity: Gabai's theorem is an independently published result with substantive content, and the paper does not invoke any uniqueness theorem from the author's own prior work to forbid alternatives. There are no fitted parameters, no subset of data used to predict a closely related quantity, and no empirical input renamed as a prediction. The step from degeneracy curves to singular orbits uses the geometric fact that degeneracy curves are cables of singular orbits together with a JSJ finiteness argument; this does not presuppose the desired finiteness. Finally, Section 5's admission that Gabai's triangulation is nonconstructive is an effectiveness limitation, not a circularity. Overall, the central claim is self-contained relative to stated external theorems, so the circularity score is 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on established theorems of Gabai, Floyd-Oertel, and standard essential lamination theory, not on fitted constants or new entities. The main unstated assumptions are orientability of M and the validity of the gut-block isotopy lemma.

assumptions (5)

standard math Gabai's Kneser normal form theorem: for a closed orientable atoroidal 3-manifold there exists a triangulation such that every taut foliation or nowhere dense essential lamination is isotopic to a normal one; every essential lamination is carried by one of finitely many essential branched surfaces.
Invoked in Sections 3 and 4 to fix a triangulation and to obtain finite branched surface carriers for all stable laminations. The paper does not reprove this external theorem.
domain assumption Denjoy splitting a pseudo-Anosov flow's stable foliation yields a nowhere dense essential lamination whose complementary regions are ideal polygon bundles over S^1.
Section 2.1 states this as a known property of pseudo-Anosov flows, and the whole guts decomposition argument depends on it.
domain assumption The closed complement of an essential lamination decomposes uniquely up to isotopy into an interstitial I-bundle and a compact gut, with interstitial annuli whose core curves are degeneracy curves of the flow.
Used in Sections 1 and 3 to relate gut boundaries to singular orbits. This is standard essential lamination theory, not proved in the paper.
standard math Floyd-Oertel theory: non-negative solutions to branched surface equations define measured laminations carried by the branched surface, and rational solutions give embedded surfaces.
Section 4 uses this to convert normalized weight vectors into a limiting lamination and then into an embedded torus contradiction.
domain assumption The manifold M is orientable and not a lens space.
Theorem A states 'closed atoroidal manifold' but the Gabai theorem quoted requires orientability, and the final step of Theorem A uses 'M is not a lens space' to assert incompressibility of tori outside. The paper never addresses nonorientable or lens space cases.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Finiteness of singular orbits of pseudo-Anosov flows." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/LLJU2LTP

@misc{pith2026260811377,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Finiteness of singular orbits of pseudo-Anosov flows},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/LLJU2LTP}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2608.11377}
}

abstract

We show that for any closed atoroidal 3-manifold $M$, there are only finitely many isotopy classes of links that can arise as singular orbits of pseudo-Anosov flows on $M$.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2608.11377 by the authors.

**Figure 1.** Left: Guts decomposition of a closed complement into the interstitial bundle I and the compact gut G. Right: A local picture of the degeneracy curve in blue near a 4-pronged singular orbit interstitial bundle along properly embedded essential annuli called the interstitial annuli. See [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 2.** Left: A pseudo-Anosov flow near a singular orbit with 3-pronged singularity. Right: Denjoy splitting near a singular orbit. Acknowledgments. I would like to thank my advisor Dave Gabai for many insightful conversations as well as his continual support and mentorship. I also thank Ian Agol, Saul Schleimer, Thomas Barthelm´e, Chi Cheuk Tsang and Jonathan Zung for their interest in this work and helpful conversations, … view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** All 7 types of normal disks in a 3-simplex 2.2. Normal Surfaces. The other main tool in this paper is the theory of normal surfaces. Definition 2.2 (Normal surface). Let τ be a triangulation of a close manifold M. An embedded surface S ⊂ M is normal if the following holds: (1) It does not pass through any vertices of τ , (2) It is transverse to the 1-complex τ 1 , and (3) For every 3-simplex σ, the intersection S ∩ … view at source ↗

Figures from the paper (3 more)

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: All possible connected polyhedral blocks C ∩ σ in the decomposition of the normalized complementary region by the triangulation. On the left are the special blocks, and on the right are the I-bundle blocks. Normalize Λs to the triangulation τ . The complementary region…

**Figure 5.** Figure 5: The result of removing block B from gut region. The interstitial annulus Aij is isotoped to now include the other faces of B on the 2-skeleton of the triangulation. with regions not in G1 separating them. This is a contradiction, and we conclude that the gut G1 consist…

**Figure 6.** Figure 6: When two non-adjacent patches P, P′ belong to the same annulus, we find a topological ball to one side of B. Then, delete B along with this ball from the guts. If P is one of two faces of B on the interstitial annuli bounding the gut G, these two faces, call them P, P′…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

25 extracted references · 17 canonical work pages

[1]

Low-dimensional topology and Kleinian groups (Coventry/Durham, 1984) , volume=

Augmented alternating link complements are hyperbolic , author=. Low-dimensional topology and Kleinian groups (Coventry/Durham, 1984) , volume=

work page 1984
[2]

Adams, C. , year=. Generalized augmented alternating links and hyperbolic volumes , volume=. Algebraic & Geometric Topology , publisher=. doi:10.2140/agt.2017.17.3375 , number=

work page doi:10.2140/agt.2017.17.3375 2017
[3]

2007 , PAGES =

Calegari, Danny , TITLE =. 2007 , PAGES =

work page 2007
[4]

Acta Math

Haken, Wolfgang , TITLE =. Acta Math. , FJOURNAL =. 1961 , PAGES =. doi:10.1007/BF02559591 , URL =

work page doi:10.1007/bf02559591 1961
[5]

Pacific J

Brittenham, Mark , TITLE =. Pacific J. Math. , FJOURNAL =. 1995 , NUMBER =

work page 1995
[6]

Gabai, David , TITLE =. J. Differential Geom. , FJOURNAL =. 1999 , NUMBER =

work page 1999
[7]

doi:10.48550/arXiv.2607.10398 , archivePrefix =

Finiteness of pseudo-Anosov flows without perfect fits. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2607.10398 , archivePrefix =. 2607.10398 , primaryClass =

arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2607.10398
[8]

B\'eguin, Francois and Bonatti, Christian and Yu, Bin , TITLE =. Geom. Topol. , FJOURNAL =. 2017 , NUMBER =. doi:10.2140/gt.2017.21.1837 , URL =

doi:10.2140/gt.2017.21.1837 2017

Show all 25 references

[9]

Bowden, Jonathan and Mann, Kathryn , TITLE =. Ann. Sci. \'Ec. Norm. Sup\'er. (4) , FJOURNAL =. 2022 , NUMBER =. doi:10.24033/asens.2512 , URL =

2022 doi
[10]

Clay, Adam and Pinsky, Tali , TITLE =. Math. Ann. , FJOURNAL =. 2025 , NUMBER =. doi:10.1007/s00208-024-03048-8 , URL =

2025 doi
[11]

doi:10.48550/arXiv.2505.21113 , archivePrefix =

Pseudo-Anosov flows on hyperbolic L-spaces. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2505.21113 , archivePrefix =. 2505.21113 , primaryClass =

doi arXiv
[12]

doi:10.48550/arXiv.2402.06551 , archivePrefix =

Existence of arbitrary large numbers of non- R -covered Anosov flows on hyperbolic 3 -manifolds. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2402.06551 , archivePrefix =. 2402.06551 , primaryClass =

doi arXiv
[13]

doi:10.48550/arXiv.2509.15375 , archivePrefix =

Pseudo-Anosov Flows: A Plane Approach. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2509.15375 , archivePrefix =. 2509.15375 , primaryClass =

doi
[14]

and Oertel, U

Floyd, W. and Oertel, U. , TITLE =. Topology , FJOURNAL =. 1984 , NUMBER =. doi:10.1016/0040-9383(84)90031-4 , URL =

1984 doi
[15]

Lackenby, Marc , TITLE =. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. , FJOURNAL =. 2014 , NUMBER =. doi:10.1090/S0002-9947-2014-06170-9 , URL =

2014 doi
[16]

Barthelm\'e, Thomas and Frankel, Steven and Mann, Kathryn , TITLE =. Invent. Math. , FJOURNAL =. 2025 , NUMBER =. doi:10.1007/s00222-025-01332-1 , URL =

2025 doi
[17]

Barthelm\'e, Thomas and Mann, Kathryn , TITLE =. Geom. Topol. , FJOURNAL =. 2024 , NUMBER =. doi:10.2140/gt.2024.28.867 , URL =

2024 doi
[18]

Journal of Fixed Point Theory and Applications , volume=

Pseudo-Anosov representatives of stable Hamiltonian structures , author=. Journal of Fixed Point Theory and Applications , volume=. 2025 , publisher=

2025
[19]

doi:10.48550/arXiv.2512.12698 , archivePrefix =

Pseudo-Anosov Reeb flows and contact structures. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2512.12698 , archivePrefix =. 2512.12698 , primaryClass =

doi
[20]

The transverse finiteness conjecture for pseudo-Anosov flows
[21]

Three-manifolds that do not admit veering triangulations
[22]

Barthelm\'e, Thomas and Paulet, Neige , title = "
[23]

2026 , month =

Saul Schleimer , howpublished =. 2026 , month =

2026
[24]

An algorithm to detect laminar 3–manifolds , volume=

Agol, Ian and Li, Tao , year=. An algorithm to detect laminar 3–manifolds , volume=. Geometry & Topology , publisher=. doi:10.2140/gt.2003.7.287 , number=

2003 doi
[25]

Bulletin of the London Mathematical Society , volume =

Schmalian, Misha , title =. Bulletin of the London Mathematical Society , volume =. doi:https://doi.org/10.1112/blms.70049 , url =. https://londmathsoc.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1112/blms.70049 , year =

doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 15, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [1]

Low-dimensional topology and Kleinian groups (Coventry/Durham, 1984) , volume=

Augmented alternating link complements are hyperbolic , author=. Low-dimensional topology and Kleinian groups (Coventry/Durham, 1984) , volume=

work page 1984

[2] [2]

Adams, C. , year=. Generalized augmented alternating links and hyperbolic volumes , volume=. Algebraic & Geometric Topology , publisher=. doi:10.2140/agt.2017.17.3375 , number=

work page doi:10.2140/agt.2017.17.3375 2017

[3] [3]

2007 , PAGES =

Calegari, Danny , TITLE =. 2007 , PAGES =

work page 2007

[4] [4]

Acta Math

Haken, Wolfgang , TITLE =. Acta Math. , FJOURNAL =. 1961 , PAGES =. doi:10.1007/BF02559591 , URL =

work page doi:10.1007/bf02559591 1961

[5] [5]

Pacific J

Brittenham, Mark , TITLE =. Pacific J. Math. , FJOURNAL =. 1995 , NUMBER =

work page 1995

[6] [6]

Gabai, David , TITLE =. J. Differential Geom. , FJOURNAL =. 1999 , NUMBER =

work page 1999

[7] [7]

doi:10.48550/arXiv.2607.10398 , archivePrefix =

Finiteness of pseudo-Anosov flows without perfect fits. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2607.10398 , archivePrefix =. 2607.10398 , primaryClass =

arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2607.10398

[8] [8]

B\'eguin, Francois and Bonatti, Christian and Yu, Bin , TITLE =. Geom. Topol. , FJOURNAL =. 2017 , NUMBER =. doi:10.2140/gt.2017.21.1837 , URL =

doi:10.2140/gt.2017.21.1837 2017