Pith. sign in

REVIEW 7 minor 299 references

Diversity as Majorization

T0 review · 0 major / 7 minor · reviewed 2026-08-15 · deepseek-v4-flash

Pith's one-line read This paper proves that a target-based majorization preorder identifies the feasible groups that maximize every separable Schur-concave diversity index, and that a reserve-and-quota policy selects such a group while favoring merit.

desk verdict A well-executed transfer of majorization to target-based diversity with genuinely useful selection results; the level-deviation assumption is the main caveat. read the letter →

arxiv 2608.11497 v1 pith:KVUECC4D submitted 2026-08-11 econ.TH

classification econ.TH
keywords majorizationdiversitypreorderreservesandquotasSchur-concaveindicesRobinHoodtransferstarget-baseddiversity-meritfrontiermarketdesign
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper is trying to establish an ordinal, target-based way to compare group diversity that does not depend on which cardinal index you happen to use. It shows that, once a benchmark target composition is fixed, one group counts as more diverse than another exactly when its composition is obtained from the other by Robin Hood-style transfers toward the target. The maximally diverse feasible selections form a frontier that simultaneously maximizes every separable Schur-concave index, including target-adjusted Shannon entropy, Gini–Simpson, Rényi entropy, and Berger–Parker. The paper then turns this frontier into a concrete selection policy: fixed type-specific reserves and quotas that pick a maximally diverse group and, within that group, the highest-merit agents. If correct, it gives institutions a principled answer to which group is more diverse and which diverse group should be picked.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the affine map $T_r(x)=x+\langle x\rangle(u-r)$, which translates an arbitrary target composition $r$ into the uniform target $u$ while preserving group size. Proposition 1 uses $T_r$ to turn $r$-targeting Robin Hood transfers—moving one unit of mass from an over-represented type to an under-represented type—into ordinary majorization: $y$ is more $r$-diverse than $x$ exactly when $T_r(x)$ majorizes $T_r(y)$. That equivalence is what connects the ordinal preorder to the separable Schur-concave indices $\Phi_g^r(y)=\sum_i g(T_i^r(y))$, and the convex-function characterization of majorization then gives the frontier as the common maximizer set. The frontier's meet and join vectors $L_r$ and $U_r$ are the reserves and quotas, so the whole policy lies in the box $\{y:L_r\le y\le U_r\}$.

What would settle it

Take a concrete population $x$, target $r$, and group size $q$, enumerate the entire budget set, and compare the $r$-diversity frontier with the maximizers of a strictly Schur-concave index such as target-adjusted Shannon entropy. Finding any non-frontier distribution with a strictly higher index value than a frontier distribution would falsify Proposition 2; finding a frontier distribution that is not a maximizer of some strictly Schur-concave index would falsify the equality claim.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that the r-diversity frontier $F_r(x,q)$—the set of feasible $q$-agent selections from a population $x$ that are maximal under the $r$-targeting diversity preorder—coincides with the intersection over all concave $g$ of the maximizers of $\Phi_g^r(y)=\sum_{i\in N} g(T_i^r(y))$, where $T_r(y)=y+\langle y\rangle(u-r)$. In particular, every strictly Schur-concave diversity index has exactly this frontier as its set of feasible maximizers, so the choice of index does not matter for which distributions are most diverse. The paper also shows that any two frontier distributions are equally $r$-diverse and every non-frontier distribution is strictly less $r$-diverse than every frontier distribution, and that the frontier can be described by lower- and upper-bound vectors $L_r(x,q)$ and $U_r(x,q)$ that differ by at most one per type. The reserve-and-quota policy fills the lower-bound slots with the highest-priority agents of each type and then fills the remaining slots by priority subject to the upper bounds; its outcome is a frontier distribution, and any alternative selection is either strictly less $r$-diverse or priority-dominated by it.

Load-bearing premise

The framework measures diversity by level deviations from a fixed target $r$, so if an institution judged over- and under-representation proportionally to target shares, or if the target itself were derived from the applicants being selected, the preorder and the reserve-and-quota conclusions would not apply.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • All maximally $r$-diverse selections of the same size are equally $r$-diverse, and every selection outside the frontier is strictly less $r$-diverse, so the incompleteness of the preorder never affects choices at the top.
  • Every non-frontier selection can be made strictly more $r$-diverse by replacing one selected agent with an agent of another type, giving a local improvement path that terminates at the frontier.
  • The reserve-and-quota policy selects a frontier distribution, and no alternative selection is both strictly more $r$-diverse and priority-superior; every alternative is less diverse, less meritorious, or both.
  • When no type is scarce, the frontier collapses to the largest-remainder apportionments of $q$ slots with entitlements $qr$, linking the diversity frontier to classical apportionment.
  • Every strictly Schur-concave index—including target-adjusted Shannon entropy, Rényi entropy, Gini–Simpson, and Berger–Parker—has the same maximizers, so institutions do not need to commit to a specific cardinal diversity measure.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The unit-width box characterization suggests a practical implementation rule: publishing just one floor and one ceiling per type, plus a merit order, fully determines a maximally diverse selection, which could be tested in laboratory or field settings with small committees.
  • Because the preorder treats each one-agent swap equally for every type, it presumes that institutions can rebalance by swapping agents; in settings where under-representation of a particular type is costlier than over-representation, a cost-weighted variant of the frontier would rank some non-frontier groups differently.
  • When the target is itself the population from which agents are drawn, the level-based deviations coincide with mirror-representation recommendations; the paper's uniform-benchmark case then implies that such mirror-representation comparisons are equivalent to majorization, which is a connection the authors leave implicit.
  • The connection to Hamilton apportionment suggests an empirical check: for groups selected from large populations where no type is scarce, the diversity frontier should coincide with largest-remainder apportionments, so committee-selection data could be re-examined through this lens.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

0 major / 7 minor

Summary. The paper proposes an ordinal diversity preorder over type distributions, parameterized by a target distribution r, via r-targeting Robin Hood transfers, and proves (Proposition 1) that it is characterized by majorization under an affine map that sends the target to the uniform distribution. The paper then studies the r-diversity frontier of feasible q-agent selections from a population. Proposition 2 shows this frontier is exactly the set of selections maximizing every separable Schur-concave index composed with the affine map; Propositions 3 and 4 establish exchange and dominance properties. Lemma 1 yields a unit-width box characterization via coordinatewise minima and maxima. Proposition 5 derives a reserve-and-quota policy whose outcome is a frontier distribution, and any alternative is either strictly less r-diverse or priority-dominated.

Significance. This is a substantial contribution. It gives an index-free, robust notion of diversity based on majorization and a target benchmark, and proves a nontrivial equivalence between the diversity frontier and the common maximizers of all separable Schur-concave indices. The reserve-and-quota policy is endogenously derived rather than assumed. The proofs are rigorous and detailed, rely on standard majorization theorems, and involve no fitted parameters. The results are falsifiable under the stated level-deviation target model. The paper connects majorization theory, apportionment, and market design, and is likely to influence subsequent work.

minor comments (7)
  1. [Section 1, related literature] The phrases 'theProceedings' and 'Doğanand' are missing spaces and should read 'the Proceedings' and 'Doğan and'.
  2. [Appendix, proof of Proposition 1] The phrase 'anr-targeting Robin Hood Transfer' should read 'an r-targeting Robin Hood transfer' (missing space and capitalization).
  3. [Proof of Proposition 3] The underbrace markup symbols such as '/bracehtipupleft/bracehtipdownright' appear to be LaTeX rendering artifacts and should be removed or typeset properly.
  4. [Section 4, footnote 4] The claim that translation and normalization preserve majorization would be clearer if it stated that the translation constant and normalization factor are common to all elements of the fixed set B(x,q), which is what makes the claim true.
  5. [Section 5, after the priority dominance definition] The statement that A_RQ lies on the 'diversity-merit Pareto frontier' is imprecise; Proposition 5 establishes a disjunction (strictly more diverse or priority-dominated), which should be stated explicitly in the text.
  6. [Proof of Proposition 5] The sentence 'there are enough remaining agents to fill all open slots without violating the quotas' is correct, but the reader would benefit from an explicit note that the open-slot candidate set S_O contains exactly one agent for each type in I and that |S_O| = ⟨U−L⟩ ≥ q−⟨L⟩.
  7. [Section 2.1] The notation Z+ and Z++ for the nonnegative and positive integers is easily misread; consider using standard double-struck symbols or a sentence clarifying that the superscript '+' is part of the symbol, not an operation.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the main characterizations are proven from standard majorization theory rather than assumed, and the reserve-and-quota policy is derived, not fitted.

full rationale

The r-diversity preorder is defined independently via r-targeting Robin Hood transfers in Definitions 1 and 2, with the target r treated as a model primitive. Proposition 1's equivalence to majorization under the affine map T_r is proved by showing that r-targeting transfers correspond exactly to standard Robin Hood transfers under T_r, using only the definition of T_r and the classical Hardy-Littlewood-Polya transfer characterization; it is not a restatement of the preorder. Proposition 2's identification of the r-diversity frontier with the simultaneous maximizers of every separable Schur-concave index Phi^r_g is also a theorem with independent content: the frontier is defined order-theoretically as the set of maximal elements under the incomplete preorder, while the intersection of argmax sets is characterized via Lemma 2's exchange argument and the convex-function characterization of majorization. Although the index class is built from the same transformation T_r, the equivalence between maximality under the preorder and simultaneous index maximization is proven, not assumed. The reserve-and-quota policy is constructed from the meet and join of the frontier, so the statement in Proposition 5 that the policy's distribution lies in F_r is an immediate consequence of Lemma 1's unit-width box characterization; this is an implementation result rather than a fitted prediction, and the merit-dominance claim is proved separately. No empirical parameters are fitted under the name of prediction, no load-bearing self-citation is used, and no uniqueness theorem is imported from the authors' prior work; the cited mathematical references (Hardy-Littlewood-Polya, Marshall-Olkin-Arnold, Murota) are standard external sources. The paper explicitly flags its level-deviation modeling choice and contrasts it with ratio-based comparisons, so that assumption is stated rather than hidden. The derivation chain is self-contained conditional on the stated target-based model.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No numbers are fitted and no empirical entities are postulated. The affine map T_r is a mathematical relabeling, not an invented physical object. All axioms are either standard majorization theory or clearly flagged modeling assumptions.

assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption The target composition r ∈ Δ^{n−1} is an exogenous primitive supplied by the institution.
    Stated in Section 3 before Definition 1; all comparative statements and the reserve/quota policy are relative to r.
  • domain assumption Diversity is evaluated in level deviations d_i^r(x)=x_i−⟨x⟩r_i rather than ratio deviations.
    Stated in Section 3; this is what makes T_r a translation and underpins Proposition 1.
  • standard math Standard majorization and Schur-concavity theorems from Hardy, Littlewood, and Polya and from Marshall, Olkin, and Arnold.
    Used in Proposition 1, Proposition 2, and the appendix proofs.
  • domain assumption Finite population with type distribution x, with q ≤ sum of x and only integer type distributions feasible.
    Model setup in Sections 2.2 and 4; the budget set B(x,q) is y ≤ x with integer coordinates and sum q.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Diversity as Majorization." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/KVUECC4D

@misc{pith2026260811497,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Diversity as Majorization},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/KVUECC4D}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2608.11497}
}
read the original abstract

How should institutions compare group diversity, and which group should they select when they value diversity and merit? We take a target-based approach that evaluates the entire group composition without treating any type as intrinsically diversity-enhancing. Because different diversity indices may rank groups differently, we instead adapt majorization to construct an ordinal diversity preorder. We show that its maximally diverse selections are exactly those maximizing every index in a broad class. This characterization yields a reserve-and-quota policy that selects a maximally diverse group and, among such groups, the highest-merit agents. Any alternative is less diverse, less meritorious, or both.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

299 extracted references · 69 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    How to Control Controlled School Choice: Comment , journal =

    Do. How to Control Controlled School Choice: Comment , journal =

  2. [2]

    Fujishige, Satoru , title =

  3. [3]

    Discrete Applied Mathematics , volume =

    Murota, Kazuo and Shioura, Akiyoshi , title =. Discrete Applied Mathematics , volume =

  4. [4]

    Journal of Mechanism and Institution Design , volume =

    Murota, Kazuo , title =. Journal of Mechanism and Institution Design , volume =

  5. [5]

    Murota, Kazuo , title =

  6. [6]

    Mathematics of Operations Research , volume =

    Murota, Kazuo and Shioura, Akiyoshi , title =. Mathematics of Operations Research , volume =

  7. [7]

    Theoretical Economics , volume =

    Fragiadakis, Daniel and Troyan, Peter , title =. Theoretical Economics , volume =

  8. [8]

    2025 , author =

    Market design with deferred acceptance: A recipe for characterizations , journal =. 2025 , author =

Show all 299 references
  1. [9]

    Proceedings of the 25th ACM Conference on Economics and Computation , pages =

    Bonet, Carlos and Arnosti, Nick and Sethuraman, Jay , title =. Proceedings of the 25th ACM Conference on Economics and Computation , pages =. 2024 , isbn =. doi:10.1145/3670865.3673537 , abstract =

  2. [10]

    Shannon, C. E. , journal=. A mathematical theory of communication , year=

  3. [11]

    2022 , note=

    Quota Adjustment Process , author=. 2022 , note=

  4. [12]

    2024 , note=

    Diversity Preferences and Affirmative Action , author=. 2024 , note=

  5. [13]

    Affirmative Action in

    Orhan Ayg\". Affirmative Action in. 2023 , note=

  6. [14]

    The Future of Economic Design: The Continuing Development of a Field as Envisioned by Its Researchers , pages=

    Refugee Matching as a Market Design Application , author=. The Future of Economic Design: The Continuing Development of a Field as Envisioned by Its Researchers , pages=. 2019 , publisher=

  7. [16]

    Econometrica , volume =

    Kleiner, Andreas and Moldovanu, Benny and Strack, Philipp , title =. Econometrica , volume =

  8. [17]

    Theoretical Economics , volume=

    Optimal persuasion via bi-pooling , author=. Theoretical Economics , volume=. 2023 , publisher=

  9. [18]

    Available at SSRN 3824913 , year=

    Priority-based Assignment with Reserves and Quotas , author=. Available at SSRN 3824913 , year=

  10. [19]

    American Economic Review , Volume =

    Delacrétaz, David and Kominers, Scott Duke and Teytelboym, Alexander , Title =. American Economic Review , Volume =. 2023 , Month =

  11. [20]

    Pathak, Parag A. and S\". Fair Allocation of Vaccines, Ventilators and Antiviral Treatments: Leaving No Ethical Value Behind in Healthcare Rationing , journal =. 2022 , doi =

  12. [21]

    Mathematics of Operations Research , year=

    Market design with distributional objectives , author=. Mathematics of Operations Research , year=

  13. [22]

    Fundamenta mathematicae , volume=

    Sur l'extension de l'ordre partiel , author=. Fundamenta mathematicae , volume=

  14. [23]

    2003 , author =

    Quasi M-convex and L-convex functions---quasiconvexity in discrete optimization , journal =. 2003 , author =

  15. [24]

    Chambers and Federico Echenique , keywords =

    Christopher P. Chambers and Federico Echenique , keywords =. Ordinal notions of submodularity , journal =. 2008 , doi =

  16. [25]

    Proceedings of the 3rd ACM conference on Electronic Commerce , pages=

    Combinatorial auctions with decreasing marginal utilities , author=. Proceedings of the 3rd ACM conference on Electronic Commerce , pages=

  17. [26]

    2001 , note =

    Relationship of M-/L-convex functions with discrete convex functions by Miller and Favati–Tardella , journal =. 2001 , note =. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-218X(01)00222-0 , url =

  18. [27]

    Topkis , journal =

    Donald M. Topkis , journal =. Minimizing a Submodular Function on a Lattice , volume =

  19. [28]

    2009 , author =

    Supermodularity and preferences , journal =. 2009 , author =

  20. [29]

    2020 , author =

    Rationalizable choice functions , journal =. 2020 , author =

  21. [30]

    Proceedings of the 23rd ACM Conference on Economics and Computation , pages =

    Bajgiran, Hamed Hamze and Echenique, Federico , title =. Proceedings of the 23rd ACM Conference on Economics and Computation , pages =. 2022 , isbn =. doi:10.1145/3490486.3538253 , abstract =

  22. [31]

    2016 , publisher=

    Lattice theory: special topics and applications , author=. 2016 , publisher=

  23. [32]

    1992 , publisher=

    Labour union objectives and collective bargaining , author=. 1992 , publisher=

  24. [33]

    1998 , publisher=

    Combinatorial engineering of decomposable systems , author=. 1998 , publisher=

  25. [34]

    The Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization , volume=

    The impossibility of a neutral hierarchy , author=. The Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization , volume=. 1989 , publisher=

  26. [35]

    University of Pennsylvania Law Review , volume=

    Law, incommensurability, and conceptually sequenced argument , author=. University of Pennsylvania Law Review , volume=. 1997 , publisher=

  27. [36]

    Path Independence and a Persistent Paradox of Population Ethics , author =

  28. [37]

    and Echenique, Federico and Saito, Kota , title =

    Ahn, David S. and Echenique, Federico and Saito, Kota , title =. Theoretical Economics , volume =

  29. [38]

    Path Independent Choices , volume =

    Ehud Kalai and Nimrod Megiddo , journal =. Path Independent Choices , volume =

  30. [39]

    Machina and Robert P

    Mark J. Machina and Robert P. Parks , journal =. On Path Independent Randomized Choice , volume =

  31. [40]

    2001 , publisher=

    Change, choice and inference: A study of belief revision and nonmonotonic reasoning , author=. 2001 , publisher=

  32. [41]

    Boston College Working Papers in Economics , year=

    Matching with Contracts: The Critical Role of Irrelevance of Rejected Contracts , author=. Boston College Working Papers in Economics , year=

  33. [42]

    Mathematics of Operations Research , volume=

    M-convex function on generalized polymatroid , author=. Mathematics of Operations Research , volume=. 1999 , publisher=

  34. [43]

    and Lokutsievskiy, Lev V

    Kushnir, Alexey I. and Lokutsievskiy, Lev V. , title =. Theoretical Economics , volume =. doi:https://doi.org/10.3982/TE4305 , url =

  35. [44]

    Gross substitutability: An algorithmic survey , journal =

    Renato. Gross substitutability: An algorithmic survey , journal =. 2017 , issn =. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geb.2017.10.016 , url =

  36. [45]

    American Economic Review , Volume =

    Kojima, Fuhito and Sun, Ning and Yu, Ning Neil , Title =. American Economic Review , Volume =. 2020 , Month =. doi:10.1257/aer.20190780 , URL =

  37. [46]

    Working paper , year=

    Job matching with subsidy and taxation , author=. Working paper , year=

  38. [47]

    International Symposium on Algorithms and Computation , pages=

    A generalized Gale-Shapley algorithm for a discrete-concave stable-marriage model , author=. International Symposium on Algorithms and Computation , pages=. 2003 , organization=

  39. [48]

    2005 , publisher=

    Submodular functions and optimization , author=. 2005 , publisher=

  40. [49]

    Journal of Economic Theory , volume=

    Interdistrict school choice: A theory of student assignment , author=. Journal of Economic Theory , volume=. 2022 , publisher=

  41. [50]

    2022 , note=

    Efficient market design with distributional objectives , author=. 2022 , note=

  42. [51]

    Japan Journal of Industrial and Applied Mathematics , volume=

    Simpler exchange axioms for M-concave functions on generalized polymatroids , author=. Japan Journal of Industrial and Applied Mathematics , volume=. 2018 , publisher=

  43. [52]

    Operations Research , volume =

    Chen, Xin and Li, Menglong , title =. Operations Research , volume =. 2021 , doi =

  44. [53]

    Culture and Power in the Reconstitution of the Chinese Realm, 200--600 , pages=

    Civil service examinations: evidence from the Northwest , author=. Culture and Power in the Reconstitution of the Chinese Realm, 200--600 , pages=. 2001 , publisher=

  45. [54]

    2025 , author =

    Meritocracy versus diversity , journal =. 2025 , author =

  46. [55]

    Journal of Combinatorial Theory, Series B , volume=

    An exchange theorem for bases of matroids , author=. Journal of Combinatorial Theory, Series B , volume=. 1974 , publisher=

  47. [56]

    Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society , volume=

    A multiple exchange property for bases , author=. Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society , volume=

  48. [57]

    Discrete Mathematics , volume=

    Some properties of basic families of subsets , author=. Discrete Mathematics , volume=. 1973 , publisher=

  49. [58]

    Bulletin of the Australian Mathematical Society , volume=

    Comments on bases in dependence structures , author=. Bulletin of the Australian Mathematical Society , volume=. 1969 , publisher=

  50. [59]

    Transversals and matroid partition

    Edmonds, Jack and Fulkerson, Delbert Ray. Transversals and matroid partition. Journal of Research of the National Bureau of Standards, Section B. 1965

  51. [60]

    SIAM Journal on Discrete Mathematics , volume=

    Matroidal choice functions , author=. SIAM Journal on Discrete Mathematics , volume=. 2019 , publisher=

  52. [61]

    A Matroid Generalization of the Stable Matching Polytope

    Fleiner, Tam \'a s. A Matroid Generalization of the Stable Matching Polytope. Integer Programming and Combinatorial Optimization. 2001

  53. [62]

    1968 , author =

    Optimal assignments in an ordered set: An application of matroid theory , journal =. 1968 , author =

  54. [63]

    2006 , publisher=

    Matroid theory , author=. 2006 , publisher=

  55. [64]

    Paths, Trees, and Flowers , volume=

    Edmonds, Jack , year=. Paths, Trees, and Flowers , volume=. doi:10.4153/CJM-1965-045-4 , journal=

  56. [65]

    Pathak and Tayfun S\"

    Parag A. Pathak and Tayfun S\". Fair Allocation of Vaccines, Ventilators and Antiviral Treatments: Leaving No Ethical Value Behind in Health Care Rationing , Year =

  57. [66]

    Affirmative Action in

    S\". Affirmative Action in. Econometrica , volume =

  58. [67]

    Affirmative Action with Overlapping Reserves , Year =

    Tayfun S\". Affirmative Action with Overlapping Reserves , Year =

  59. [68]

    Pathak and Alex Rees-Jones and Tayfun S\"

    Parag A. Pathak and Alex Rees-Jones and Tayfun S\". Immigration Lottery Design: Engineered and Coincidental Consequences of H-1B Reforms , Year =

  60. [69]

    Econometrica , volume =

    Che, Yeon-Koo and Kim, Jinwoo and Kojima, Fuhito , title =. Econometrica , volume =

  61. [70]

    and Leshno, Jacob D

    Azevedo, Eduardo M. and Leshno, Jacob D. , title =. Journal of Political Economy , volume =

  62. [71]

    , Title =

    Kojima, Fuhito and Pathak, Parag A. , Title =. American Economic Review , Volume =. 2009 , Month =

  63. [72]

    Proceedings of the 2019 ACM Conference on Economics and Computation , series =

    Correa, Jose and Epstein, Rafael and Escobar, Juan and Rios, Ignacio and Bahamondes, Bastian and Bonet, Carlos and Epstein, Natalie and Aramayo, Nicolas and Castillo, Martin and Cristi, Andres and Epstein, Boris , title =. Proceedings of the 2019 ACM Conference on Economics an...

  64. [73]

    Lexicographic Choice under Variable Capacity Constraints , journal =

    Do. Lexicographic Choice under Variable Capacity Constraints , journal =

  65. [74]

    Choice with Affirmative Action , journal =

    Do. Choice with Affirmative Action , journal =

  66. [75]

    On Capacity-Filling and Substitutable Choice Rules , journal =

    Do. On Capacity-Filling and Substitutable Choice Rules , journal =

  67. [76]

    Hughes, Melanie M. , year=. Intersectionality, Quotas, and Minority Women's Political Representation Worldwide , volume=. American Political Science Review , publisher=. doi:10.1017/S0003055411000293 , number=

  68. [77]

    Is Gender like Ethnicity? The Political Representation of Identity Groups , volume=

    Htun, Mala , year=. Is Gender like Ethnicity? The Political Representation of Identity Groups , volume=. Perspectives on Politics , publisher=. doi:10.1017/S1537592704040241 , number=

  69. [78]

    2001 , publisher=

    Combinatorial optimization: networks and matroids , author=. 2001 , publisher=

  70. [79]

    2009 , publisher=

    Matching theory , author=. 2009 , publisher=

  71. [80]

    American Economic Review , Volume =

    Calsamiglia, Caterina and Haeringer, Guillaume and Klijn, Flip , Title =. American Economic Review , Volume =. 2010 , Month =. doi:10.1257/aer.100.4.1860 , URL =

  72. [81]

    Constrained school choice

    Guillaume Haeringer and Flip Klijn. Constrained school choice. Journal of Economic Theory. 2009. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jet.2009.05.002

  73. [82]

    Centralized admissions for engineering colleges in India , Year =

    Surender Baswana and Partha Pratim Chakrabarti and Sharat Chandran and Yashodhan Kanoria and Utkarsh Patange , Note =. Centralized admissions for engineering colleges in India , Year =

  74. [83]

    Matching Problem of Civil Service , Year =

    Ashutosh Thakur , Note =. Matching Problem of Civil Service , Year =

  75. [84]

    2019 , month=

    Tayfun S\". 2019 , month=

  76. [85]

    The Supreme Court of India

    Burt Neuborne. The Supreme Court of India. International Journal of Constitutional Law. 2003

  77. [86]

    Incentives in landing slot problems

    James Schummer and Azar Abizada. Incentives in landing slot problems. Journal of Economic Theory. 2017. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jet.2017.04.003

  78. [87]

    , Title =

    Schummer, James and Vohra, Rakesh V. , Title =. American Economic Journal: Microeconomics , Volume =. 2013 , Month =. doi:10.1257/mic.5.2.164 , URL =

  79. [88]

    Refugee Matching as a Market Design Application , Year =

    Tommy Andersson , Note =. Refugee Matching as a Market Design Application , Year =

  80. [89]

    Refugee Resettlement , Year =

    David Delacr. Refugee Resettlement , Year =

  81. [90]

    Journal of Refugee Studies , volume =

    Jones, Will and Teytelboym, Alexander , title =. Journal of Refugee Studies , volume =. 2017 , month =. doi:10.1093/jrs/fex022 , url =

  82. [91]

    Journal of Political Economy , volume =

    Budish, Eric , title =. Journal of Political Economy , volume =. 2011 , doi =

  83. [92]

    2005 , Author =

    Pairwise kidney exchange , Journal =. 2005 , Author =

  84. [93]

    Hal R. Varian. Position auctions. International Journal of Industrial Organization. 2007. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijindorg.2006.10.002

  85. [94]

    American Economic Review , Volume =

    Edelman, Benjamin and Ostrovsky, Michael and Schwarz, Michael , Title =. American Economic Review , Volume =. 2007 , Month =. doi:10.1257/aer.97.1.242 , URL =

  86. [95]

    Bumin Yenmez , title=

    Isa Hafalir and Fuhito Kojima and M. Bumin Yenmez , title=. doi:, note=

  87. [96]

    2017 , publisher=

    Network flows: theory, algorithms, and applications , author=. 2017 , publisher=

  88. [97]

    Journal of the ACM (JACM) , volume=

    Theoretical improvements in algorithmic efficiency for network flow problems , author=. Journal of the ACM (JACM) , volume=. 1972 , publisher=

  89. [98]

    Chambers and M

    Christopher P. Chambers and M. Bumin Yenmez. A simple characterization of responsive choice. Games and Economic Behavior. 2018

  90. [99]

    2006 , month =

    Changing the Boston School Choice Mechanism , author =. 2006 , month =. doi:10.3386/w11965 , URL =

  91. [100]

    American Economic Review , volume=

    Matching with contracts: Comment , author=. American Economic Review , volume=

  92. [101]

    Proceedings of the 5th ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce , pages =

    Bing, Meir and Lehmann, Daniel and Milgrom, Paul , title =. Proceedings of the 5th ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce , pages =. 2004 , type =

  93. [102]

    Working Paper , year =

    Gul, Faruk and Pesendorfer, Wolfgang and Zhang, Mu , title =. Working Paper , year =

  94. [103]

    Working Paper , year =

    Fuhito Kojima and Ning Sun and Ning Neil Yu , title =. Working Paper , year =

  95. [104]

    Minimizing Justified Envy in School Choice: The Design of New Orleans' OneApp , Note =

    Atila Abdulkad\. Minimizing Justified Envy in School Choice: The Design of New Orleans' OneApp , Note =

  96. [105]

    , Title =

    Hassidim, Avinatan and Romm, Assaf and Shorrer, Ran I. , Title =. American Economic Review , Volume =. 2017 , Month =. doi:10.1257/aer.p20171048 , URL =

  97. [106]

    2011 , publisher=

    After Brown: The rise and retreat of school desegregation , author=. 2011 , publisher=

  98. [107]

    , author=

    Public school segregation in metropolitan areas. , author=. Land Economics , volume=

  99. [108]

    Rivkin , journal =

    Steven G. Rivkin , journal =. Residential Segregation and School Integration , volume =

  100. [109]

    Bumin Yenmez

    M. Bumin Yenmez. A college admissions clearinghouse. Journal of Economic Theory. 2018. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jet.2018.05.010

  101. [110]

    Hidden substitutability , Year =

    John William Hatfield and Scott Duke Kominers , Note =. Hidden substitutability , Year =

  102. [111]

    Efficient allocation mechanism with endowments and distributional constraints , Year =

    Takamasa Suzuki and Akihisa Tamura and Naoto Hamada and Makoto Yokoo , Note =. Efficient allocation mechanism with endowments and distributional constraints , Year =

  103. [112]

    Strategyproof Matching with Minimum Quotas , volume =

    Fragiadakis, Daniel and Iwasaki, Atsushi and Troyan, Peter and Ueda, Suguru and Yokoo, Makoto , year =. Strategyproof Matching with Minimum Quotas , volume =

  104. [113]

    Efficient Matching under Distributional Constraints: Theory and Applications , Year =

    Yuichiro Kamada and Fuhito Kojima , Journal =. Efficient Matching under Distributional Constraints: Theory and Applications , Year =

  105. [114]

    The Japanese Economic Review , volume=

    Accommodating various policy goals in matching with constraints , author=. The Japanese Economic Review , volume=. 2020 , publisher=

  106. [115]

    Improving Fairness and Efficiency in Matching with Distributional Constraints: An Alternative Solution for the Japanese Medical Residency Match , Year =

    Goto, Masahiro and Iwasaki, Atsushi and Kawasaki, Yujiro and Yasuda, Yosuke and Yokoo, Makotoo , Note =. Improving Fairness and Efficiency in Matching with Distributional Constraints: An Alternative Solution for the Japanese Medical Residency Match , Year =

  107. [116]

    , title =

    Candogan, Ozan and Epitropou, Markos and Vohra, Rakesh V. , title =. Operations Research , volume =

  108. [117]

    Designing matching mechanisms under constraints: An approach from discrete convex analysis

    Fuhito Kojima and Akihisa Tamura and Makoto Yokoo. Designing matching mechanisms under constraints: An approach from discrete convex analysis. Journal of Economic Theory. 2018. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jet.2018.05.004

  109. [118]

    On the Lattice Structure of Stable Allocations in Two-Sided Discrete-Concave Market , Volume =

    Kazuo Murota and Yu Yokoi , Journal =. On the Lattice Structure of Stable Allocations in Two-Sided Discrete-Concave Market , Volume =

  110. [119]

    Discrete Convex Analysis: A Tool for Economics and Game Theory , Volume =

    Kazuo Murota , Journal =. Discrete Convex Analysis: A Tool for Economics and Game Theory , Volume =

  111. [120]

    and Fleiner, T

    Biro, P. and Fleiner, T. and Irving, R.W. and Manlove, D.F. , Date-Modified =. The College Admissions Problem with Lower and Common Quotas , Volume =. Theoretical Computer Science , Number =

  112. [121]

    Stability concepts in matching with distributional constraints , Volume =

    Yuichiro Kamada and Fuhito Kojima , Journal =. Stability concepts in matching with distributional constraints , Volume =

  113. [122]

    Discrete Convex Analysis , Year =

    Murota, Kazuo , Publisher =. Discrete Convex Analysis , Year =

  114. [123]

    A General Two-sided Matching Market with Discrete Concave Utility Functions , Volume =

    Satoru Fujishige and Akihisa Tamura , Journal =. A General Two-sided Matching Market with Discrete Concave Utility Functions , Volume =

  115. [124]

    A Two-sided Discrete-concave Market with Possibly Bounded Side Payments: An Approach by Discrete Convex Analysis , Volume =

    Satoru Fujishige and Akihisa Tamura , Date-Modified =. A Two-sided Discrete-concave Market with Possibly Bounded Side Payments: An Approach by Discrete Convex Analysis , Volume =. Mathematics of Operations Research , Number =

  116. [125]

    Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research , volume=

    Controlled school choice with soft bounds and overlapping types , author=. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research , volume=

  117. [126]

    Proceedings of the 2016 International Conference on Autonomous Agents & Multiagent Systems , pages=

    Pareto efficient strategy-proof school choice mechanism with minimum quotas and initial endowments , author=. Proceedings of the 2016 International Conference on Autonomous Agents & Multiagent Systems , pages=. 2016 , organization=

  118. [127]

    Theoretical Economics , volume =

    Kamada, Yuichiro and Kojima, Fuhito , title =. Theoretical Economics , volume =. 2018 , pages =

  119. [128]

    American Economic Journal: Microeconomics , Volume =

    Goto, Masahiro and Kojima, Fuhito and Kurata, Ryoji and Tamura, Akihisa and Yokoo, Makoto , Title =. American Economic Journal: Microeconomics , Volume =. 2017 , Month =. doi:10.1257/mic.20160124 , URL =

  120. [129]

    Bumin Yenmez , Note =

    Mehmet Ekmekci and M. Bumin Yenmez , Note =. Common Enrollment in School Choice , Year =

  121. [130]

    Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on Economics and Computation , pages=

    Stable Matching with Proportionality Constraints , author=. Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on Economics and Computation , pages=. 2017 , organization=

  122. [131]

    Games and Economic Behavior , volume=

    Fair implementation of diversity in school choice , author=. Games and Economic Behavior , volume=

  123. [132]

    2020 , author =

    Dynamic reserves in matching markets , journal =. 2020 , author =

  124. [133]

    Verimli Pozitif Ayr

    Ayg. Verimli Pozitif Ayr. T\"

  125. [134]

    Large-Scale Affirmative Action in School Choice: Admissions to IITs in India , Journal =

    Ayg. Large-Scale Affirmative Action in School Choice: Admissions to IITs in India , Journal =. 2017 , Month =. doi:10.1257/aer.p20171049 , URL =

  126. [135]

    American Economic Journal: Microeconomics , volume=

    College admission with multidimensional privileges: The Brazilian affirmative action case , author=. American Economic Journal: Microeconomics , volume=. 2021 , publisher=

  127. [136]

    Journal of Economic Theory , volume=

    Responsive affirmative action in school choice , author=. Journal of Economic Theory , volume=

  128. [137]

    Theoretical Economics , volume =

    Fragiadakis, Daniel and Troyan, Peter , title =. Theoretical Economics , volume =. 2017 , pages =

  129. [138]

    2016 , month=

    Halley Potter and Kimberly Quick and Elizabeth Davies , title =. 2016 , month=

  130. [139]

    Wells, Amy Stuart and Baldridge, Bianca J and Duran, Jacquelyn and Grzesikowski, Courtney and Lofton, Richard and Roda, Allison and Warner, Miya and White, Terrenda , title =

  131. [140]

    and Malishevski, Andrew V

    Aizerman, Mark A. and Malishevski, Andrew V. , Journal =

  132. [141]

    Boyle, Elette and Echenique, Federico , Journal =

  133. [142]

    and Postlewaite, Andrew and Samuelson, Larry , Journal =

    Liu, Qingmin and Mailath, George J. and Postlewaite, Andrew and Samuelson, Larry , Journal =

  134. [143]

    Bumin , Journal =

    Yenmez, M. Bumin , Journal =

  135. [144]

    Ahmad Peivandi and Rakesh Vohra , Note =

  136. [145]

    Ahmad Peivandi , Note =

  137. [146]

    Hardin, Garrett , Journal =

  138. [147]

    Fox , Date =

    Jeremy C. Fox , Date =. Boston Globe , Title =

  139. [148]

    Haluk Ergin and Tayfun S\"

  140. [149]

    Umut Mert Dur and Onur Kesten , Note =

  141. [150]

    Umut Mert Dur and Utku \"

  142. [151]

    Umut Mert Dur and Devrim Ikizler , Month =

  143. [152]

    Bumin Yenmez , Note =

    Marek Pycia and M. Bumin Yenmez , Note =

  144. [153]

    Fryer , Journal =

    Roland G. Fryer , Journal =. Injecting Charter School Best Practices into Traditional Public Schools: Evidence from Field Experiments , Year =

  145. [154]

    The Quarterly Journal of Economics , Number = 2, Pages =

    Atila Abdulkad\. The Quarterly Journal of Economics , Number = 2, Pages =

  146. [155]

    Some further properties of the cumulative offer process

    Mustafa O g uz Afacan. Some further properties of the cumulative offer process. Games and Economic Behavior. 2017. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geb.2017.06.006

  147. [156]

    Vikram Manjunath and Bertan Turhan , Journal =

  148. [157]

    Hall, Philip , Journal =

  149. [158]

    Nathan, Joe , Publisher =

  150. [159]

    Kojima, Fuhito , Journal =

  151. [160]

    Kesten, Onur , Journal =

  152. [161]

    , Journal =

    Plott, Charles R. , Journal =

  153. [162]

    , Isbn = 0300013647, Publisher =

    Arrow, Kenneth J. , Isbn = 0300013647, Publisher =

  154. [163]

    D. G. McVitie and L. B. Wilson , Journal =

  155. [164]

    Federico Echenique , Journal =

  156. [165]

    and Yenmez, M

    Chambers, Christopher P. and Yenmez, M. Bumin , Title =. American Economic Journal: Microeconomics , Volume =. 2017 , Month =

  157. [166]

    Operations Research , volume=

    Stability in large matching markets with complementarities , author=. Operations Research , volume=. 2014 , publisher=

  158. [167]

    , Journal =

    Ashlagi, Itai and Roth, Alvin E. , Journal =

  159. [168]

    Pathak , Journal =

    Parag A. Pathak , Journal =

  160. [169]

    Journal of Economic Theory , Number = 1, Pages =

    Tayfun S\". Journal of Economic Theory , Number = 1, Pages =

  161. [170]

    Roth , Journal =

    Alvin E. Roth , Journal =

  162. [171]

    Dubins and David A

    Lester E. Dubins and David A. Freedman , Journal =

  163. [172]

    Avery, Christopher and Fairbanks, Andrew and Zeckhauser, Richard J , Publisher =

  164. [173]

    Pathak and Tayfun S\"

    Umut Dur and Parag A. Pathak and Tayfun S\". Explicit vs. Statistical Preferential Treatment in Affirmative Action: Theory and Evidence from Chicago's Exam Schools , Volume =. Journal of Economic Theory , Pages =

  165. [174]

    Dur, Umut and Kominers, Scott Duke and Pathak, Parag A. and S\". Reserve Design: Unintended Consequences and the Demise of Boston’s Walk Zones , journal =

  166. [175]

    Echenique, Federico , Journal =

  167. [176]

    Hafalir , Journal =

    Isa E. Hafalir , Journal =

  168. [177]

    Hiroo Sasaki and Manabu Toda , Journal =

  169. [178]

    Roth, Alvin E. and S\". The American Economic Review , Number = 2, Pages =

  170. [179]

    Avery, Christopher and Levin, Jonathan , Journal =

  171. [180]

    and Xing, Xiaolin , Journal =

    Roth, Alvin E. and Xing, Xiaolin , Journal =

  172. [181]

    , Journal =

    Ergin, Haluk I. , Journal =

  173. [182]

    Journal of Public Economics , Number =

    Haluk Ergin and Tayfun S\". Journal of Public Economics , Number =

  174. [183]

    Journal of Economic Theory , Month =

    Michel Balinski and Tayfun S\". Journal of Economic Theory , Month =

  175. [184]

    , Journal =

    Roth, Alvin E. , Journal =

  176. [185]

    and Pathak, Parag A

    Angrist, Joshua D. and Pathak, Parag A. and Walters, Christopher R. , Journal =

  177. [186]

    Econometrica , Number = 1, Pages =

    Atila Abdulkad\. Econometrica , Number = 1, Pages =

  178. [187]

    Econometrica , Number = 2, Pages =

    S\". Econometrica , Number = 2, Pages =

  179. [188]

    Yuichiro Kamada and Fuhito Kojima , Note =

  180. [189]

    Bumin Yenmez , Note =

    Peter Chen and Michael Egesdal and Marek Pycia and M. Bumin Yenmez , Note =

  181. [190]

    Axioms for Deferred Acceptance , Url =

    Kojima, Fuhito and Manea, Mihai , Doi =. Axioms for Deferred Acceptance , Url =. Econometrica , Keywords =

  182. [191]

    Pathak, Parag A. and S\". American Economic Review , Month =

  183. [192]

    Bumin Yenmez , Journal =

    Federico Echenique and M. Bumin Yenmez , Journal =

  184. [193]

    and Nakajima, D

    Masatlioglu, Y. and Nakajima, D. and Ozbay, E.Y. , Journal =

  185. [194]

    Ariel Rubinstein and Lin Zhou , Journal =

  186. [195]

    Aytek Erdil and Taro Kumano , Note =

  187. [196]

    Lars Ehlers and Yves Sprumont , Journal =

  188. [197]

    Alves and Charles V

    Michael J. Alves and Charles V. Willie , Doi =. Controlled choice assignments: A new and more effective approach to school desegregation , Url =. The Urban Review , Pages =

  189. [198]

    American Economic Review , Volume =

    Bagde, Surendrakumar and Epple, Dennis and Taylor, Lowell , Title =. American Economic Review , Volume =. 2016 , Month =. doi:10.1257/aer.20140783 , URL =

  190. [199]

    Thomas Sowell , Publisher =

  191. [200]

    2019 , publisher=

    The meritocracy trap , author=. 2019 , publisher=

  192. [201]

    , Journal =

    Weitzman, Martin L. , Journal =

  193. [202]

    and Olkin, I

    Marshall, A.W. and Olkin, I. and Arnold, B.C. , Publisher =

  194. [203]

    1952 , publisher=

    Inequalities , author=. 1952 , publisher=

  195. [204]

    2016 , publisher=

    Revealed preference theory , author=. 2016 , publisher=

  196. [205]

    International Journal of Game Theory , volume=

    College admissions with affirmative action , author=. International Journal of Game Theory , volume=. 2005 , publisher=

  197. [206]

    American Economic Review , Month =

    Atila Abdulkad\. American Economic Review , Month =

  198. [207]

    Fuhito Kojima , Journal =

  199. [208]

    , Publisher =

    Theil, H. , Publisher =

  200. [209]

    and Sen, A

    Foster, J. and Sen, A. , Publisher =

  201. [210]

    and Yenmez, M

    Hafalir, Isa E. and Yenmez, M. Bumin and Yildirim, Muhammed A. , Journal =

  202. [211]

    Hafalir and M

    Lars Ehlers and Isa E. Hafalir and M. Bumin Yenmez and Muhammed A. Yildirim. School choice with controlled choice constraints: Hard bounds versus soft bounds. Journal of Economic Theory. 2014

  203. [212]

    , Issn = 00129682, Journal =

    Roth, Alvin E. , Issn = 00129682, Journal =. The Economist as Engineer: Game Theory, Experimentation, and Computation as Tools for Design Economics , Url =

  204. [213]

    , Note =

    Fox, Jeremy T. , Note =

  205. [214]

    The Journal of Finance , Number = 6, Pages =

    S. The Journal of Finance , Number = 6, Pages =

  206. [215]

    , Date-Added =

    Clark, S. , Date-Added =. The BE Journal of Theoretical Economics , Number = 1, Pages = 8, Publisher =

  207. [216]

    and Yariv, L

    Niederle, M. and Yariv, L. , Date-Added =

  208. [217]

    The Review of Economics and Statistics , Number = 2, Pages =

    Famulari, Melissa , Issn =. The Review of Economics and Statistics , Number = 2, Pages =

  209. [218]

    Bumin Yenmez , Note =

    Federico Echenique and Sangmok Lee and Matthew Shum and M. Bumin Yenmez , Note =

  210. [219]

    Federico Echenique and Leeat Yariv , Note =

  211. [220]

    Federico Echenique and SangMok Lee and Matthew Shum , Journal =

  212. [221]

    Varian , Journal =

    Hal R. Varian , Journal =

  213. [222]

    Journal of Economic Theory , Number = 2, Pages =

    Anna Bogomolnaia and Herv\'. Journal of Economic Theory , Number = 2, Pages =

  214. [223]

    Richard Blundell and Martin Browning and Ian Crawford , Journal =

  215. [224]

    and Komornik, Z

    Komornik, V. and Komornik, Z. and Viauroux, C.K. , Journal =

  216. [225]

    Bumin Yenmez , Journal =

    Michael Schwarz and M. Bumin Yenmez , Journal =

  217. [226]

    and Moody, J

    Bearman, P.S. and Moody, J. and Stovel, K. , Issn =. The American Journal of Sociology , Number = 1, Pages =

  218. [227]

    Klaus, Bettina and Klijn, Flip , Issue = 4, Journal =

  219. [228]

    American Economic Review , Number = 5, Pages =

    Orhan Ayg\". American Economic Review , Number = 5, Pages =

  220. [229]

    Stable schedule matching under revealed preference , Url =

    Ahmet Alkan and David Gale , Doi =. Stable schedule matching under revealed preference , Url =. Journal of Economic Theory , Keywords =

  221. [230]

    and Zeckhauser, R

    Hylland, A. and Zeckhauser, R. , Journal =

  222. [231]

    and Jackson, M.O

    Currarini, S. and Jackson, M.O. and Pin, P. , Issn =. Econometrica , Number = 4, Pages =

  223. [232]

    Federico Echenique and SangMok Lee and Matthew Shum , Date-Modified =

  224. [233]

    Journal of Economic theory , volume=

    School choice: an experimental study , author=. Journal of Economic theory , volume=. 2006 , publisher=

  225. [234]

    , Journal =

    Rothblum, U.G. , Journal =

  226. [235]

    and Rothblum, U.G

    Roth, A.E. and Rothblum, U.G. and. Mathematics of Operations Research , Number = 4, Pages =

  227. [236]

    Onur Kesten and Utku \"

  228. [237]

    Chernozhukov and H

    V. Chernozhukov and H. Hong and E. Tamer , Journal =

  229. [238]

    Heckman and R

    J. Heckman and R. Matzkin and L. Nesheim , Note =

  230. [239]

    Romano and A

    J. Romano and A. Shaikh , Journal =

  231. [240]

    Haile and E

    P. Haile and E. Tamer , Journal =

  232. [241]

    Ciliberto and E

    F. Ciliberto and E. Tamer , Journal =

  233. [242]

    Chiappori and R

    P. Chiappori and R. Economic Theory , Pages =

  234. [243]

    Pakes and J

    A. Pakes and J. Porter and K. Ho and J. Ishii , Note =

  235. [244]

    Andrews and S

    D. Andrews and S. Berry and P. Jia , Note =

  236. [245]

    and Echenique, Federico , Institution =

    Chambers, Christopher P. and Echenique, Federico , Institution =. The core matchings of markets with transfers , Type =

  237. [246]

    , Date-Added =

    Shapley, LS and Shubik, M. , Date-Added =. International Journal of Game Theory , Number = 1, Pages =

  238. [247]

    Wooders , Journal =

    Mamoru Kaneko and Myrna H. Wooders , Journal =

  239. [248]

    Ahmet Alkan and Gabrielle Demange and David Gale , Journal =

  240. [249]

    Marilda Sotomayor , Journal =

  241. [250]

    Jun Wako , Journal =

  242. [251]

    Koopmans and Martin Beckmann , Journal =

    Tjalling C. Koopmans and Martin Beckmann , Journal =

  243. [252]

    Fox , Note =

    Patrick Bajari and Jeremy T. Fox , Note =

  244. [253]

    Lars Ehlers , Journal =

  245. [254]

    Irving and Paul Leather , Journal =

    Robert W. Irving and Paul Leather , Journal =

  246. [255]

    Ricardo Lagos , Journal =

  247. [256]

    Wong , Note =

    Linda Y. Wong , Note =

  248. [257]

    Robert Shimer and Lones Smith , Journal =

  249. [258]

    Pissarides , Journal =

    Barbara Petrongolo and Christopher A. Pissarides , Journal =

  250. [259]

    Ehud Lehrer and Dinah Rosenberg , Journal =

  251. [260]

    Ehud Lehrer and Dinah Rosenberg and Eran Shmaya , Note =

  252. [261]

    Eran Shmaya , Journal =

  253. [262]

    The Quarterly Journal of Economics , volume=

    Matching with couples: Stability and incentives in large markets , author=. The Quarterly Journal of Economics , volume=. 2013 , publisher=

  254. [263]

    Fuhito Kojima and Utku \"

  255. [264]

    Rothblum , Journal =

    Yosef Blum and Uriel G. Rothblum , Journal =

  256. [265]

    Roth and Uriel G

    Yosef Blum and Alvin E. Roth and Uriel G. Rothblum , Journal =

  257. [266]

    David Cantala , Journal =

  258. [267]

    Jinpeng Ma , Journal =

  259. [268]

    Bettina Klaus and Flip Klijn , Journal =

  260. [269]

    Operations Research Letters , Mrclass =

  261. [270]

    Mathematics of Operations Research , Mrclass =

    Teo, Chung-Piaw and Sethuraman, Jay , Fjournal =. Mathematics of Operations Research , Mrclass =

  262. [271]

    Alfred Galichon and Bernard Salanie , Note =

  263. [272]

    Roth and John H

    Alvin E. Roth and John H. Econometrica , Month =

  264. [273]

    Aumann , Journal =

    Robert J. Aumann , Journal =

  265. [274]

    Tatsuro Ichiishi , Publisher =

  266. [275]

    Shapley , Journal =

    Lloyd S. Shapley , Journal =

  267. [276]

    Peyton Young , Journal =

    H. Peyton Young , Journal =

  268. [277]

    Bezalel Peleg and Peter Sudh\"olter , Publisher =

  269. [278]

    Atakan , Journal =

    Alp E. Atakan , Journal =

  270. [279]

    Federico Echenique , Note =

  271. [280]

    The New York City High School Match , Url =

    Atila Abdulkad\. The New York City High School Match , Url =. American Economic Review , Jstor_Articletype =

  272. [281]

    Hiroyuki Adachi , Journal =

  273. [282]

    Mark Aizerman and Fuad Aleskerov , Number = 38, Publisher =

  274. [283]

    Journal of Economic Theory , Month =

    Jos\'. Journal of Economic Theory , Month =

  275. [284]

    Games and Economic Behavior , Month =

    Jos\'. Games and Economic Behavior , Month =

  276. [285]

    Ahmet Alkan , Journal =

  277. [286]

    Samson Alva , title =

  278. [287]

    David Austen-Smith and Jeffrey Scot Banks , Publisher =

  279. [288]

    Mathematics of Operations Research , Number = 4, Pages =

    Ba\". Mathematics of Operations Research , Number = 4, Pages =

  280. [289]

    Econometrica , Month =

    Salvador Barber\'. Econometrica , Month =

  281. [290]

    Social Choice and Welfare , Month =

    Suryapratim Banerjee and Hideo Konishi and Tayfun S\". Social Choice and Welfare , Month =

  282. [291]

    Becker , Journal =

    Gary S. Becker , Journal =

  283. [292]

    Mathematical Social Sciences, , Month =

    Carmen Bevi\'. Mathematical Social Sciences, , Month =

  284. [293]

    Charles Blair , Journal =

  285. [294]

    Jackson , Journal =

    Anna Bogomolnaia and Matthew O. Jackson , Journal =

  286. [295]

    Jeremy Bulow and Jonathan Levin , Note =

  287. [296]

    Eugene Choo and Aloysius Siow , Journal =

  288. [297]

    Beresteanu and F

    A. Beresteanu and F. Molinari , Journal =

  289. [298]

    Journal of Economic Theory , Month =

    Bhaskar Dutta and Jordi Mass\'. Journal of Economic Theory , Month =

  290. [299]

    Federico Echenique and Jorge Oviedo , Journal =

  291. [300]

    Bumin Yenmez , Note =

    Federico Echenique and SangMok Lee and M. Bumin Yenmez , Note =

Pith tools

Reviewed August 15, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.