Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 6 minor 41 references

Reducing Spectral Oscillations for Robust Reference Frequency-Based Ultrasound Attenuation Estimation in Harmonic Imaging

T0 review · 2 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-16 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The paper establishes that averaging frequency power-ratio decay curves from multiple transmit frequencies and steering angles suppresses interference-induced oscillations, improving ultrasound attenuation coefficient accuracy and…

desk verdict A solid, well-executed extension of frequency/angular compounding to RFM-based attenuation estimation, with a tuning caveat on the same phantoms. read the letter →

arxiv 2608.12169 v1 pith:IXWBGVFG submitted 2026-08-12 physics.med-ph

U-Wai Lok , Jingke Zhang , Chengwu Huang , Tao Wu , Jieyang Jin , Ryan M. DeRuiter , Jingyi Yin , Lijie Huang
show 9 more authors
Yanzhe Zhao Kaipeng Ji Kate M. Knoll Dawn Boynton Kymberly D. Watt Kathryn A. Robinson Joshua D. Trzasko Matthew Callstrom Shigao Chen
This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.med-ph
keywords ultrasoundattenuationcoefficientestimationreferencefrequencymethodpower-ratiodecaycurveharmonicimaginghepaticsteatosisoscillationsuppressionmultifrequencytransmissionsteeringangleaveraging
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Ultrasound attenuation coefficient estimation (ACE) is a promising noninvasive way to quantify liver fat, but the reference frequency method (RFM) suffers from oscillations in its frequency power-ratio decay curves (FPDCs) caused by constructive and destructive interference among backscattered echoes. This paper proposes transmitting at several harmonic frequencies and steering angles, computing one FPDC per transmit setting, and averaging them; the premise is that the oscillation patterns are weakly correlated across settings while the attenuation-dependent slope is the same. In calibrated phantoms the averaged curves are markedly more linear, the estimated attenuation coefficients move closer to the calibrated values, and inter-block variability shrinks. In a pilot patient study the correlation with MRI-PDFF rises from R=0.83 to R=0.89 and repeated-measurement variability falls, suggesting the approach makes ACE more robust. If the underlying decorrelation premise holds, the method is a simple, system-independent way to stabilize RFM without needing a reference phantom.

What carries the argument

The central object is the frequency power-ratio decay curve (FPDC), formed by taking the natural logarithm of the ratio of backscattered power at adjacent frequency components and plotting it against depth; under the RFM model its slope is proportional to the attenuation coefficient. The mechanism is transmit diversity plus averaging. Each frequency-angle combination produces a different interference pattern, so the oscillatory parts of the FPDCs are weakly correlated, but the attenuation decay term, the slope, is common. Averaging across all M×N curves therefore cancels oscillations while preserving the slope, and linear regression on the averaged curve yields a more stable ACE estimate. A secondary design choice is selecting Δf = 0.5 MHz and Δθ = 8° as the largest separations that keep all transmissions within the transducer bandwidth and beam directivity.

What would settle it

In a homogeneous phantom with known attenuation, compute the residual standard deviation of detrended FPDCs after averaging 1, 2, 4, 9, and 16 transmissions; under the weakly-correlated-oscillation hypothesis the residual should decrease roughly as the square root of the number averaged and the fitted slope should converge to the calibrated value. If the residual variance plateaus above zero or the slope systematically departs from calibration as more curves are averaged, the decorrelation premise fails.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that averaging FPDCs obtained under transmit diversity improves ACE because the interference-induced oscillations are weakly correlated between different harmonic transmit frequencies and steering angles, while the attenuation-dependent decay slope is common to all of them. With three transmit frequencies (4.0, 4.5, 5.0 MHz) and three steering angles (−8°, 0°, 8°), the average of nine FPDCs has higher linearity than any single curve: median R² rises from 0.87–0.90 to 0.99 in the two calibrated phantoms, and the estimated attenuation coefficients move closer to the calibrated values (0.51 vs 0.56 dB/cm/MHz on the 0.5 dB/cm/MHz phantom; 0.77 vs 0.70–0.71 dB/cm/MHz on the 0.76 dB/cm/MHz phantom). The same advantage appears when a pork-belly layer simulates phase aberration, and in 15 patients the median ACE correlates with MRI-PDFF at R=0.89 versus 0.83 for conventional RFM, with the pooled standard deviation of repeated measurements dropping by nearly half.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that FPDCs acquired at different transmit frequencies and steering angles carry weakly correlated oscillation patterns while sharing the same attenuation-dependent slope, so that averaging cancels the oscillations without biasing the slope.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Phantom ACE estimates become both more accurate and more precise: median FPDC R² reaches 0.99 and inter-block coefficient of variation falls to roughly 1% or below in the tested phantoms.
  • The benefit survives phase aberration: with a 17 mm pork-belly layer interposed, median R² stays above 0.96 versus 0.85–0.86 for conventional RFM.
  • In the pilot clinical data, median ACE correlates more strongly with MRI-PDFF (R=0.89 vs 0.83) and is more repeatable across ten repeated measurements, with pooled SD dropping from 0.0667 to 0.0378 dB/cm/MHz.
  • Because the total number of transmissions is matched to conventional RFM, the improvement is attributed to frequency-angle diversity rather than to additional acquisition time.
  • The method inherits RFM's system independence, so it needs no calibrated reference phantom and can be implemented on research ultrasound scanners with a sequence change.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Beyond the paper, the decorrelation premise suggests an adaptive scheme: since FPDC correlation falls as Δf and Δθ grow, picking the largest separations the transducer bandwidth allows, per patient, should suppress oscillations even further than the fixed 3×3 grid tested here.
  • A testable extension is to apply the same averaging logic to other spectrum-based estimators such as spectral-shift or spectral-difference methods, which share the interference problem but not RFM's adjacent-frequency normalization; if the decorrelation is a property of the scattering medium rather than the estimator, those methods should improve as well.
  • The paper's pilot cohort is small and the decorrelation assumption was validated on phantoms rather than liver tissue; an untested consequence is that performance may be tissue-dependent, with strongly structured or coherent scatterers showing less benefit from averaging or even a biased slope.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper proposes a multi-frequency, multi-angle transmission scheme for reference frequency method (RFM)-based ultrasound attenuation coefficient estimation (ACE) in harmonic imaging. The authors hypothesize that FPDCs acquired at different transmit frequencies and steering angles exhibit weakly correlated interference-induced oscillations while sharing the same attenuation-dependent slope, so that averaging them suppresses oscillations and improves the linearity and accuracy of ACE. Two calibrated tissue-mimicking phantoms are used first to select frequency and angle spacings (Δf = 0.5 MHz, Δθ = 8°) from FPDC correlation curves, and then to show that the proposed method improves median R² (0.99 vs 0.89–0.90), mean ACE accuracy (0.51 and 0.77 vs 0.56 and 0.70–0.71 dB/cm/MHz), and inter-block CV compared with conventional RFM, both with and without an overlying pork-belly layer. A pilot patient study (n=15) reports improved correlation with MRI-PDFF (R = 0.89 vs 0.83) and a reduced pooled SD (0.0378 vs 0.0667 dB/cm/MHz).

Significance. If the central claim holds, the proposed method offers a simple, physically motivated improvement to RFM-based ACE, a technique already considered promising for noninvasive liver fat assessment. Strengths of the work include a fair matched-transmission-count control between the proposed and conventional acquisition schemes, consistent improvements across multiple metrics in two phantoms (including under simulated phase aberration), and a clear falsifiable hypothesis about decorrelation of spectral oscillations. The work is, however, currently limited by the fact that the key acquisition parameters were selected and evaluated on the same experimental data, and by the absence of statistical inference for the in vivo results; the quantitative magnitude of the improvement over conventional RFM is therefore not yet established out-of-sample.

major comments (2)
  1. [III-A and III-B] The optimal frequency spacing Δf = 0.5 MHz and steering-angle spacing Δθ = 8° are selected from NCC/R² correlation curves computed on the same two calibrated phantoms (0.5 and 0.76 dB/cm/MHz) that are then used in Section III-B to report the headline improvements (e.g., mean ACE 0.51 vs 0.56 dB/cm/MHz, CV 0.84% vs 2.16%). The parameter choice is therefore optimized and evaluated on the same data, so the reported gains over conventional RFM are not an independent test of the method's key design choice. Please provide an out-of-sample validation (e.g., a separate calibration phantom, or leave-one-phantom-out selection) or demonstrate that the conclusions are robust across a plausible range of Δf and Δθ values. Without this, the abstract's quantitative claims overstate the support.
  2. [III-C and IV] The in vivo result in the abstract ('R = 0.89 vs. 0.83' and reduced pooled SD) is based on only 15 patients, yet no confidence intervals, significance tests, or uncertainty estimates are reported for the correlation difference or for the pooled SD reduction. Given the small cohort, the observed differences may be within sampling variability. Please add bootstrap confidence intervals for R for each method and for the difference in R, and report the uncertainty of the pooled SD estimates (or a formal test). The paper's own discussion acknowledges the small sample size as a limitation, but the abstract's 'clinical potential' claim requires at least interval estimates to avoid overinterpretation.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Fig. 5 and Fig. 6 legends] The legends list '5.5 MHz' for some FPDCs, whereas the text consistently states the three harmonic frequencies are 4.0, 4.5, and 5.0 MHz. Please correct the figure legends for consistency.
  2. [Section II-E, Eq. (5)] There is a typo in Eq. (5): 'Stan dard' should be 'Standard'.
  3. [Fig. 2 labels] The abbreviation 'Frequecny' appears in the figure axis labels; it should be 'Frequency'.
  4. [Section II-D] The MRI-PDFF measurement is cited as reference [35], but reference [35] is a paper on multi-core DSP beamforming, not on the IDEAL IQ MRI sequence. Similarly, reference [34] does not appear to support the statement about 'previous work [34]' regarding median ACE. Please correct these citations.
  5. [Abstract and Section III-A] The phrase 'In in-vitro experiments using calibrated phantoms (0.5 and 0.76 dB/cm/MHz) demonstrated' is grammatically incomplete; suggest 'In in-vitro experiments with calibrated phantoms (0.5 and 0.76 dB/cm/MHz), the proposed method demonstrated...'.
  6. [Section III-A] The selection of Δf = 0.5 MHz and Δθ = 8° is described as a 'balance' between R², NCC, and bandwidth/directivity, but no formal optimization criterion is defined. Clarify whether the choice is unique or whether adjacent spacings give similar performance; this is related to the out-of-sample concern in the first major comment.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 4.0 of 10

Frequency/angle increments are selected and validated on the same phantoms, so the reported phantom R²/ACE gains are partly in-sample rather than an independent test.

  1. fitted input called prediction [Section II.C (Phantom study) and Section III.B (Performance evaluation using attenuation phantoms)]
    "Our first objective was to determine the optimal transmission frequency and steering angle settings by evaluating the FPDC correlation as a function of frequency separation (Δf) and steering angle separation (Δθ) ... These correlation curves were then used to determine the optimal thresholds for selecting transmission frequency and steering angle parameters. The second objective of the phantom study was to evaluate the robustness of the proposed method ... using the transmission frequencies and steering angles selected in the first objective."

    The optimal Δf and Δθ are chosen on the same two calibrated phantoms by maximizing FPDC linearity (higher R²) and minimizing NCC. The headline phantom results are then reported on those exact phantoms: median R² rises to 0.99 and mean ACE moves closer to the calibrated values. The R² improvement is therefore not an out-of-sample test; it is partly a consequence of selecting parameters that optimize R² on the evaluation data. The ACE values themselves are not algebraically forced by the parameter choice, and the in vivo pilot uses the same chosen parameters, so this is partial circularity rather than full reduction by construction.

full rationale

The core mechanism—averaging FPDCs with weakly correlated oscillations to suppress interference while preserving the attenuation slope—is not circular. The RFM baseline is cited from the authors' earlier work, but that is an externally published method and not the novel claim. The primary circularity concern is in-sample hyperparameter selection: Δf = 0.5 MHz and Δθ = 8° are selected from correlation/linearity curves measured on the same two phantoms on which the improved median R² and ACE accuracy are subsequently reported. This makes the phantom validation optimistically biased for the method's key free parameters. The in vivo patient study (n=15) provides some independent evidence using the phantom-selected parameters and shows improved correlation with MRI-PDFF (R = 0.89 vs. 0.83), but the paper itself acknowledges the small cohort as a limitation and provides no confidence intervals or significance testing. Overall, the central result has independent content, but the phantom-based validation of the parameter choice is not fully independent.

Assumptions & free parameters 5 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the RFM spectral model, the linear-attenuation assumption, and the decorrelation hypothesis. The method introduces no new physical entities. Numerical design choices (Δf, Δθ, M, N, block step) are empirical and were partly selected on the same phantoms used for validation, which is the main circularity burden.

free parameters (5)
  • Harmonic frequency spacing Δf = 0.5 MHz
    Selected from NCC and R² trade-off curves measured on the same two validation phantoms (Fig. 4a,c), not from an a priori design rule.
  • Steering angle spacing Δθ = 8 degrees
    Selected from NCC and R² trade-off curves on the same validation phantoms (Fig. 4b,d).
  • Number of transmit frequencies M = 3
    Practical compromise within the transducer bandwidth; no independent optimization is reported.
  • Number of steering angles N = 3
    Practical compromise given transducer directivity and signal quality; no independent optimization is reported.
  • Analysis block step size = 10 pixels
    Used for block placement in the FPDC analysis; the effect of this choice on ACE estimates is not characterized.
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption Adjacent frequency components have negligible differences in beamforming, diffraction, and TGC, so those system terms cancel in the spectral ratio (Eq. 3).
    Invoked in Section II-A to derive Eq. (4); may fail near transducer band edges or under strong focusing.
  • domain assumption Tissue attenuation is linear in frequency, A = exp(-4 a f z).
    Used in Eq. (2) and in the interpretation of the FPDC slope; the authors acknowledge this assumption as a limitation in the Discussion.
  • domain assumption The backscatter coefficient ratio ln[BC(fi)] - ln[BC(fi-1)] is depth-independent over the ROI.
    The FPDC slope is interpreted as -4a(fi-fi-1) only if this intercept term is constant with depth (Eq. 4).
  • domain assumption Oscillations in FPDCs from different transmit frequencies and steering angles are weakly correlated while the attenuation-dependent decay trend is preserved.
    This is the central hypothesis stated in the Introduction and tested in Section III-A; the entire proposed improvement depends on it.
  • domain assumption Pulse-inversion harmonic imaging isolates the harmonic component and suppresses reverberation.
    Relied on for the harmonic imaging RFM setup, with supporting references [14], [21], and [22].
  • domain assumption The calibrated phantom attenuation values (0.50 and 0.76 dB/cm/MHz) are accurate ground truth.
    Used to judge ACE accuracy; the calibration uncertainty of the phantoms is not reported.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Reducing Spectral Oscillations for Robust Reference Frequency-Based Ultrasound Attenuation Estimation in Harmonic Imaging." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/IXWBGVFG

@misc{pith2026260812169,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Reducing Spectral Oscillations for Robust Reference Frequency-Based Ultrasound Attenuation Estimation in Harmonic Imaging},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/IXWBGVFG}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2608.12169}
}
read the original abstract

Ultrasound attenuation coefficient estimation (ACE) has emerged as a quantitative imaging biomarker for noninvasive assessment of hepatic steatosis. A system-independent technique based on spectral normalization, known as the reference frequency method (RFM), was previously proposed to estimate ACE without requiring a well-calibrated reference phantom. Furthermore, incorporating harmonic imaging can significantly suppress reverberation signals. In previous clinical study, RFM has achieved high correlation with MRI-PDFF, demonstrating its potential for clinical application. However, a major challenge of RFM is the presence of oscillations in the frequency power-ratio decay curves (FPDCs), which can distort the linear fitting used to estimate the attenuation coefficient and consequently degrade ACE accuracy. These oscillations arise from constructive and destructive interference among backscattered echoes, resulting in oscillatory fluctuations in the measured power spectrum that propagate into the FPDCs. We propose a transmission scheme combining multiple frequencies and steering angles to mitigate oscillations in the FPDCs. Averaging these FPDCs suppresses the interference-induced oscillations while preserving the attenuation-dependent decay trend, thereby improving linearity and the accuracy of ACE results. In in-vitro experiments using calibrated phantoms (0.5 and 0.76 dB/cm/MHz) demonstrated that the proposed method improved FPDC linearity and ACE accuracy, achieving an R2 of 0.99 and attenuation coefficient estimates of 0.51 and 0.77 dB/cm/MHz, versus an R2 of 0.89 and estimates of 0.56 and 0.70 dB/cm/MHz for conventional RFM. The proposed method also demonstrated superior performance in a pilot patient study (n=15), achieving a stronger correlation with MRI-PDFF (R = 0.89 vs. 0.83) while reducing inter-measurement variability, indicating improved robustness and clinical potential.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2608.12169 by the authors.

Figure 4
Figure 4. (a-d) Normalized cross-correlation and coefficient of determination (R²) between FPDCs as functions of harmonic frequency increment (Δf) and steering angle increment (Δθ). Results for the 0.5 dB/cm/MHz phantom are shown in (a) and (b), while results for the 0.76 dB/cm/MHz phantom are shown in (c) and (d). FPDCs correspond to three distinct harmonic frequencies (light-colored dotted lines) and their average (deep-col… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. (a) Frequency power ratio decay curve with different harmonics frequencies and steering angle for 0.5 dB/cm/MHz phantom, and the corresponding ACE results using (b) the conventional and proposed RFM methods and (c) the proposed RFM approach. (d) Frequency power ratio decay curve with different harmonics frequencies and steering angle for 0.76 dB/cm/MHz phantom, and the corresponding ACE results using (e) the convent… view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Correlation analysis between median ACE and MRI-PDFF for (a) conventional RFM and (b) proposed RFM methods. The red dot represents the median ACE value from repeated measurements of an individual patient, and error bars indicate the interquartile range (IQR). Blue dashed lines indicate linear regression fits. The proposed RFM method achieved improved correlation with MRI-PDFF (R = 0.89) compared with the conventiona… view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

41 extracted references · 31 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Quantitative Imaging Biomarkers of NAFLD,

    S. Kinner, S. B. Reeder, and T. Yokoo, "Quantitative Imaging Biomarkers of NAFLD," (in eng), Dig Dis Sci, vol. 61, no. 5, pp. 1337-47, May 2016, doi: 10.1007/s10620-016-4037-1

    work page doi:10.1007/s10620-016-4037-1 2016

  2. [2]

    Ultrasound Attenuation Coefficient as a Biomarker of Hepatic Steatosis: State of the Art and Software Evaluation,

    G. Esposto et al. , "Ultrasound Attenuation Coefficient as a Biomarker of Hepatic Steatosis: State of the Art and Software Evaluation," (in eng), J Clin Med, vol. 15, no. 5, Feb 27 2026, doi: 10.3390/jcm15051816

    work page doi:10.3390/jcm15051816 2026

  3. [3]

    Assessment of hepatic steatosis by using attenuation imaging: a quantitative, easy-to-perform ultrasound technique,

    J. S. Bae et al., "Assessment of hepatic steatosis by using attenuation imaging: a quantitative, easy-to-perform ultrasound technique," (in eng), Eur Radiol, vol. 29, no. 12, pp. 6499 -6507, Dec 2019, doi: 10.1007/s00330-019-06272-y

    work page doi:10.1007/s00330-019-06272-y 2019

  4. [4]

    Performance evaluation of the spectral centroid downshift method for attenuation estimation,

    K. Samimi and T. Varghese, "Performance evaluation of the spectral centroid downshift method for attenuation estimation," (in eng), IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control, vol. 62, no. 5, pp. 871-80, May 2015, doi: 10.1109/tuffc.2014.006945

    work page arXiv 2015

  5. [5]

    In vivo ultrasonic attenuation slope estimates for detecting cervical ripening in rats: Preliminary results,

    T. A. Bigelow, B. L. McFarlin, W. D. O'Brien, and M. L. Oelze, "In vivo ultrasonic attenuation slope estimates for detecting cervical ripening in rats: Preliminary results," (in eng), J Acoust Soc Am, vol. 123, no. 3, pp. 1794-800, Mar 2008, doi: 10.1121/1.2832317

    work page doi:10.1121/1.2832317 2008

  6. [6]

    Backscatter coefficient measurements using a reference phantom to extract depth-dependent instrumentation factors,

    L. X. Yao, J. A. Zagzebski, and E. L. Madsen, "Backscatter coefficient measurements using a reference phantom to extract depth-dependent instrumentation factors," (in eng), Ultrason Imaging, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 58 -70, Jan 1990, doi: 10.1177/016173469001200105

    work page doi:10.1177/016173469001200105 1990

  7. [7]

    Clinical application of an ultrasound attenuation coefficient estimation technique for liver pathology characterization,

    R. Kuc, "Clinical application of an ultrasound attenuation coefficient estimation technique for liver pathology characterization," (in eng), IEEE Trans Biomed Eng, vol. 27, no. 6, pp. 312-9, Jun 1980, doi: 10.1109/tbme.1980.326739

    work page arXiv 1980

  8. [8]

    Hybrid spectral domain method for attenuation slope estimation,

    H. Kim and T. Varghese, "Hybrid spectral domain method for attenuation slope estimation," (in eng), Ultrasound Med Biol, vol. 34, no. 11, pp. 1808 -19, Nov 2008, doi: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2008.04.011

    work page doi:10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2008.04.011 2008

Show all 41 references
  1. [9]

    Ultrasound attenuation estimation using the LMSE filters and the median filter,

    H. S. Jang, M. H. Lee, and S. B. Park, "Ultrasound attenuation estimation using the LMSE filters and the median filter," (in eng), Ultrasound Med Biol, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 51 -8, 1988, doi: 10.1016/0301-5629(88)90163-9

    1988 doi

  2. [10]

    Fast linear least -squares method for ultrasound attenuation and backscatter estimation,

    J. Birdi, A. Muraleedharan, J. D'Hooge, and A. Bertrand, "Fast linear least -squares method for ultrasound attenuation and backscatter estimation," (in eng), Ultrasonics, vol. 116, p. 106503, Sep 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.ultras.2021.106503

    2021

  3. [11]

    Simultaneous imaging of ultrasonic relative backscatter and attenuation coefficients for quantitative liver steatosis assessment,

    J. Timaná, H. Chahuara, L. Basavarajappa, A. Basarab, K. Hoyt, and R. Lavarello, "Simultaneous imaging of ultrasonic relative backscatter and attenuation coefficients for quantitative liver steatosis assessment," (in eng), Sci Rep, vol. 13, no. 1, p. 8898, Jun 1 2023, doi: 10....

    2023 doi

  4. [12]

    Deep-Learning-Driven High Spatial Resolution Attenuation Imaging for Ultrasound Tomography (AI -UT),

    M. Liu, Z. Kou, J. W. Wiskin, G. J. Czarnota, and M. L. Oelze, "Deep-Learning-Driven High Spatial Resolution Attenuation Imaging for Ultrasound Tomography (AI -UT)," (in eng), IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control, vol. 72, no. 9, pp. 1173 - 1186, Sep 2025, doi: 10.1109...

    2025

  5. [13]

    Deep Learning With Ultrasound Images Enhance the Diagnosis of Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver,

    Y. Liu, W. Yu, P. Wang, Y. Huang, J. Li, and P. Li, "Deep Learning With Ultrasound Images Enhance the Diagnosis of Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver," (in eng), Ultrasound Med Biol, vol. 50, no. 11, pp. 1724-1730, Nov 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2024.07.014

    2024 doi

  6. [14]

    Ultrasound Attenuation Estimation in Harmonic Imaging for Robust Fatty Liver Detection,

    P. Gong et al. , "Ultrasound Attenuation Estimation in Harmonic Imaging for Robust Fatty Liver Detection," (in eng), Ultrasound Med Biol, vol. 46, no. 11, pp. 3080 -3087, Nov 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2020.07.006

    2020 doi

  7. [15]

    Novel Quantitative Liver Steatosis Assessment Method With Ultrasound Harmonic Imaging,

    P. Gong et al. , "Novel Quantitative Liver Steatosis Assessment Method With Ultrasound Harmonic Imaging," (in eng), J Ultrasound Med, vol. 44, no. 1, pp. 77 -85, Jan 2025, doi: 10.1002/jum.16582

    2025 doi

  8. [16]

    Noise Suppression for Ultrasound Attenuation Coefficient Estimation Based on Spectrum Normalization,

    P. Gong et al. , "Noise Suppression for Ultrasound Attenuation Coefficient Estimation Based on Spectrum Normalization," (in eng), IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control, vol. 68, no. 8, pp. 2667-2674, Aug 2021, doi: 10.1109/tuffc.2021.3074293

    2021

  9. [17]

    Improved Ultrasound Attenuation Estimation with Non-uniform Structure Detection and Removal,

    P. Gong et al., "Improved Ultrasound Attenuation Estimation with Non-uniform Structure Detection and Removal," (in eng), Ultrasound Med Biol, vol. 48, no. 11, pp. 2292-2301, Nov 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2022.06.022

    2022 doi

  10. [18]

    Tada et al

    T. Tada et al. , "Utility of Attenuation Coefficient Measurement Using an Ultrasound-Guided Attenuation Parameter for Evaluation of Hepatic Steatosis: Comparison With MRI -Determined Proton Density Fat Fraction," (in eng), AJR Am J Roentgenol, vol. 212, no. 2, pp. 332-341, Feb...

    2019 doi

  11. [19]

    Simultaneous backscatter and attenuation estimation using a least squares method with constraints,

    K. Nam, J. A. Zagzebski, and T. J. Hall, "Simultaneous backscatter and attenuation estimation using a least squares method with constraints," (in eng), Ultrasound Med Biol, vol. 37, no. 12, pp. 2096-104, Dec 2011, doi: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2011.08.008

    2011 doi

  12. [20]

    System - Independent Ultrasound Attenuation Coefficient Estimation Using Spectra Normalization,

    P. Gong, P. Song, C. Huang, J. Trzasko, and S. Chen, "System - Independent Ultrasound Attenuation Coefficient Estimation Using Spectra Normalization," (in eng), IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control, vol. 66, no. 5, pp. 867 -875, May 2019, doi: 10.1109/tuffc.2019.2903010

    2019

  13. [21]

    Pulse inversion Doppler: a new method for detecting nonlinear echoes from microbubble contrast agents,

    D. H. Simpson, C. T. Chin, and P. N. Burns, "Pulse inversion Doppler: a new method for detecting nonlinear echoes from microbubble contrast agents," (in eng), IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control, vol. 46, no. 2, pp. 372 -82, 1999, doi: 10.1109/58.753026

    1999 doi

  14. [22]

    Improvement of tissue harmonic imaging using the pulse -inversion technique,

    Q. Ma, Y. Ma, X. Gong, and D. Zhang, "Improvement of tissue harmonic imaging using the pulse -inversion technique," (in eng), Ultrasound Med Biol, vol. 31, no. 7, pp. 889 -94, Jul 2005, doi: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2005.03.006

    2005 doi

  15. [23]

    U. W. Lok et al., "Quantitative Shear Wave Speed Assessment for Muscles With the Diagnosis of Taut Bands and/or Myofascial Trigger Points Using Probe Oscillation Shear Wave Elastography: A Pilot Study," (in eng), J Ultrasound Med, vol. 41, no. 4, pp. 845- 854, Apr 2022, doi: 1...

    2022 doi

  16. [24]

    Coherent plane wave compounding for very high frame rate ultrasonography of rapidly moving targets,

    B. Denarie et al., "Coherent plane wave compounding for very high frame rate ultrasonography of rapidly moving targets," (in eng), IEEE Trans Med Imaging, vol. 32, no. 7, pp. 1265-76, Jul 2013, doi: 10.1109/tmi.2013.2255310

    2013

  17. [25]

    High -Frame-Rate Contrast Echocardiography Using Diverging Waves: Initial In Vitro and In Vivo Evaluation,

    M. Toulemonde et al. , "High -Frame-Rate Contrast Echocardiography Using Diverging Waves: Initial In Vitro and In Vivo Evaluation," (in eng), IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control, vol. 65, no. 12, pp. 2212 -2221, Dec 2018, doi: 10.1109/tuffc.2018.2856756

    2018

  18. [26]

    Wide Field-of-View Ultrafast Curved Array Imaging Using Diverging Waves,

    J. Kang, D. Go, I. Song, and Y. Yoo, "Wide Field-of-View Ultrafast Curved Array Imaging Using Diverging Waves," (in eng), IEEE Trans Biomed Eng, vol. 67, no. 6, pp. 1638 -1649, Jun 2020, doi: 10.1109/tbme.2019.2942164

    2020

  19. [27]

    Video-Rate Dual-Modal Wide-Beam Harmonic Ultrasound and Photoacoustic Computed Tomography,

    Y. Zhang, Y. Wang, P. Lai, and L. Wang, "Video-Rate Dual-Modal Wide-Beam Harmonic Ultrasound and Photoacoustic Computed Tomography," (in eng), IEEE Trans Med Imaging, vol. 41, no. 3, pp. 727-736, Mar 2022, doi: 10.1109/tmi.2021.3122240

    2022

  20. [28]

    Quantitative assessment of ultrasound microvessel imaging in Crohn's disease: correlation with pathological inflammation,

    U. W. Lok et al. , "Quantitative assessment of ultrasound microvessel imaging in Crohn's disease: correlation with pathological inflammation," (in eng), Eur Radiol, vol. 35, no. 5, pp. 2806-2817, May 2025, doi: 10.1007/s00330-024-11156-x. > REPLACE THIS LINE WITH YOUR PAPER ID...

    2025 doi

  21. [29]

    Contrast-Free Ultrasound Microvascular Imaging via Radiality and Similarity Weighting,

    J. Yin et al., "Contrast-Free Ultrasound Microvascular Imaging via Radiality and Similarity Weighting," IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, pp. 1-1, 2026, doi: 10.1109/TUSON.2026.3699956

    2026

  22. [30]

    U. W. Lok et al., "Ultrasound Microvessel Imaging of the Human Placenta Demonstrates Altered Vessel Densities in Fetal Growth Restriction With Vascular and Immune Pathologies: A Pilot Case - Control Study," (in eng), J Ultrasound Med, vol. 44, no. 2, pp. 285- 299, Feb 2025, do...

    2025 doi

  23. [31]

    A Coded Excitation Framework for High SNR Transcranial Ultrasound Imaging,

    E. P. Vienneau and B. C. Byram, "A Coded Excitation Framework for High SNR Transcranial Ultrasound Imaging," (in eng), IEEE Trans Med Imaging, vol. 42, no. 10, pp. 2886-2898, Oct 2023, doi: 10.1109/tmi.2023.3269022

    2023

  24. [32]

    An Inverse Class -E Power Amplifier for Ultrasound Transducer,

    H. Choi, "An Inverse Class -E Power Amplifier for Ultrasound Transducer," (in eng), Sensors (Basel), vol. 23, no. 7, Mar 26 2023, doi: 10.3390/s23073466

    2023 doi

  25. [33]

    A Nonrecursive Digital Calibration Technique for Joint Elimination of Transmitter and Receiver I/Q Imbalances With Minimized Add-On Hardware,

    W. H. Yu et al., "A Nonrecursive Digital Calibration Technique for Joint Elimination of Transmitter and Receiver I/Q Imbalances With Minimized Add-On Hardware," IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems II: Express Briefs, vol. 60, no. 8, pp. 462 -466, 2013, doi: 10.1109/TCSII...

    2013

  26. [34]

    High-power burst and chirp amplifier for MHz ultrasonics,

    J. Hyvönen et al., "High-power burst and chirp amplifier for MHz ultrasonics," (in eng), Rev Sci Instrum, vol. 96, no. 12, Dec 1 2025, doi: 10.1063/5.0277982

    2025 doi

  27. [35]

    Ultrasound phase rotation beamforming on multi-core DSP,

    J. Ma, K. Karadayi, M. Ali, and Y. Kim, "Ultrasound phase rotation beamforming on multi-core DSP," (in eng), Ultrasonics, vol. 54, no. 1, pp. 99-105, Jan 2014, doi: 10.1016/j.ultras.2013.03.016

    2014 doi

  28. [36]

    U. W. Lok, P. Song, J. D. Trzasko, E. A. Borisch, R. Daigle, and S. Chen, "Parallel Implementation of Randomized Singular Value Decomposition and Randomized Spatial Downsampling for Real Time Ultrafast Microvessel Imaging on a Multi -Core CPUs Architecture," in 2018 IEEE Inter...

    2018

  29. [37]

    GPU-based beamformer: fast realization of plane wave compounding and synthetic aperture imaging,

    B. Y. Yiu, I. K. Tsang, and A. C. Yu, "GPU-based beamformer: fast realization of plane wave compounding and synthetic aperture imaging," (in eng), IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control, vol. 58, no. 8, pp. 1698 -705, Aug 2011, doi: 10.1109/tuffc.2011.1999

    2011

  30. [38]

    An Open Source GPU -Based Beamformer for Real -Time Ultrasound Imaging and Applications,

    D. Hyun, Y. L. Li, I. Steinberg, M. Jakovljevic, T. Klap, and J. J. Dahl, "An Open Source GPU -Based Beamformer for Real -Time Ultrasound Imaging and Applications," in 2019 IEEE International Ultrasonics Symposium (IUS), 6-9 Oct. 2019 2019, pp. 20 -23, doi: 10.1109/ULTSYM.2019.8926193

    2019

  31. [39]

    Transform -Based Channel -Data Compression to Improve the Performance of a Real -Time GPU - Based Software Beamformer,

    U. W. Lok and P. C. Li, "Transform -Based Channel -Data Compression to Improve the Performance of a Real -Time GPU - Based Software Beamformer," (in eng), IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control, vol. 63, no. 3, pp. 369-80, Mar 2016, doi: 10.1109/tuffc.2016.2519441

    2016

  32. [40]

    Real -time Adaptive and Localized Spatiotemporal Clutter Filtering for Ultrasound Small Vessel Imaging,

    C. Huang, U. W. Lok, J. Zhang, H. Liu, and S. Chen, "Real -time Adaptive and Localized Spatiotemporal Clutter Filtering for Ultrasound Small Vessel Imaging," Preprint 2024 2024, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2405.11105

    2024 doi arXiv

  33. [41]

    A heterogeneous nonlinear attenuating full -wave model of ultrasound,

    G. F. Pinton, J. Dahl, S. Rosenzweig, and G. E. Trahey, "A heterogeneous nonlinear attenuating full -wave model of ultrasound," (in eng), IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control, vol. 56, no. 3, pp. 474 -88, Mar 2009, doi: 10.1109/tuffc.2009.1066

    2009

Pith tools

Reviewed August 16, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.