Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 79 references

Impact of Neutrino Flavour Conversion on the Diffuse Neutrino Background from Neutrino-dominated Accretion Flows

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-16 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Neutrino flavour conversion reshapes the diffuse NDAF background so that its detectability hinges on the neutrino mass ordering.

desk verdict A coherent, useful calculation of heavy-lepton neutrino spectra from NDAFs, but the optimistic normal-ordering detectability claim collides with the paper's own quoted Super-K upper limit. read the letter →

arxiv 2608.12177 v1 pith:VTFIBFX6 submitted 2026-08-12 astro-ph.HE

Yun-Feng Wei , Tong Liu This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.HE
keywords diffuseneutrinobackgroundneutrino-dominatedaccretionflowflavourconversionmassorderingMSWeffectcore-collapsesupernovafallbackHyper-KamiokandeJUNO
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper argues that neutrino flavour conversion decisively reshapes the diffuse neutrino background from neutrino-dominated accretion flows (NDAFs), so strongly that whether this background can be detected at all depends on the neutrino mass ordering. Because the unoscillated heavy-lepton neutrino ($\nu_x$) spectra are more than an order of magnitude below the electron antineutrino spectra, the survival probability of $\bar{\nu}_e$ after propagation controls the total flux. Under the adiabatic MSW approximation, that survival probability is $|U_{e1}|^2$ in normal ordering and $|U_{e3}|^2$ in inverted ordering, making the predicted normal-ordering flux exceed the inverted-ordering flux by more than an order of magnitude. The authors compute event numbers in JUNO and Hyper-Kamiokande and find that in optimistic normal-ordering models Hyper-K could detect over one hundred $\bar{\nu}_e$ events in ten years, while the inverted-ordering signal is too weak for a significant detection. This implies that the DNNB could serve as a complementary probe of the neutrino mass ordering and of NDAF physics.

What carries the argument

The central object is the flavour-converted electron antineutrino flux of the DNNB, Eq. (9): $d\Phi_{\bar{\nu}_e}/dE = \bar{p}\,d\Phi^0_{\bar{\nu}_e}/dE + (1-\bar{p})\,d\Phi^0_{\nu_x}/dE$, where $\bar{p}$ is the adiabatic MSW survival probability of $\bar{\nu}_e$, equal to $|U_{e1}|^2$ in normal ordering and $|U_{e3}|^2$ in inverted ordering. The argument works because the unoscillated $\nu_x$ spectrum is more than an order of magnitude below $\bar{\nu}_e$, so the second term is a small correction and the total flux tracks the survival probability. The machinery also includes the fitting formulae for the heavy-lepton neutrino cooling rate and disk temperature as functions of black hole mass, spin, accretion rate, and radius, used to build the $\nu_x$ spectra from the NDAF evolution data.

What would settle it

A multi-angle neutrino-transport simulation of an NDAF disk that finds efficient collective oscillations swapping $\bar{\nu}_e$ and $\nu_x$ would invalidate the adiabatic-MSW survival probabilities in Eq. (9) and break the predicted ordering contrast; alternatively, a decade-long Hyper-K exposure that measures a DNNB flux below the normal-ordering prediction, or consistent with inverted ordering, would falsify the central detectability claim.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is that the diffuse NDAF neutrino background (DNNB) is strongly shaped by neutrino flavour conversion, with its detectability controlled by the neutrino mass ordering. Using fallback core-collapse supernova simulations, the authors compute for the first time the unoscillated heavy-lepton neutrino spectra from NDAFs and find them more than an order of magnitude weaker than the electron antineutrino spectra, reflecting the dominance of Urca processes in the disk. With the adiabatic MSW survival probability $\bar{p} = |U_{e1}|^2$ for normal ordering and $\bar{p} = |U_{e3}|^2$ for inverted ordering, the flavour-converted $\bar{\nu}_e$ flux is given by Eq. (9), and the resulting DNNB flux in all considered models is more than an order of magnitude higher in the normal ordering than in the inverted ordering. In the most optimistic normal-ordering scenarios, Hyper-Kamiokande could identify over one hundred events in a decade, while the inverted-ordering signal is too weak to claim a detection.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that neutrino flavour conversion in NDAF sources is governed by the adiabatic MSW effect with survival probabilities $|U_{e1}|^2$ (normal ordering) and $|U_{e3}|^2$ (inverted ordering), while collective neutrino oscillations and shock-induced non-adiabatic transitions are neglected.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the DNNB is detected under normal ordering, its flux and spectral shape provide a new observational handle on the cosmic rate of NDAFs and the average neutrino emission per event, complementing the diffuse supernova neutrino background.
  • A JUNO determination of the neutrino mass ordering would select which DNNB prediction is the relevant one, removing the dominant uncertainty in the detectability estimate.
  • A joint analysis of the DNNB with the stochastic gravitational wave background from NDAFs could constrain the average neutrino emission per NDAF event and help separate the DNNB from the DSNB.
  • The predicted high-energy spectral hardness of the DNNB, if weak explosions are common, offers a signature that could distinguish it from the conventional DSNB.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The detectability conclusion rests on the adiabatic MSW approximation; if collective neutrino oscillations efficiently swap $\bar{\nu}_e$ and $\nu_x$ in the dense disk, the survival probability entering Eq. (9) would change and the ordering contrast could shrink or reverse.
  • The same flux-mixing formula could be applied to other astrophysical neutrino backgrounds where the unoscillated heavy-lepton flux is subdominant, turning flavour conversion into a generic mass-ordering diagnostic.
  • A non-detection of the DNNB in Hyper-K after a decade would not simply rule out NDAFs; it would constrain the fraction of weak explosions and the metallicity distribution of progenitors, since these parameters control the predicted flux.
  • A testable extension would be a spectral-shape analysis of the DNNB in the 12-30 MeV window with JUNO's energy resolution, which could distinguish normal from inverted ordering by the energy dependence, not just the total rate.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper models the diffuse neutrino background from neutrino-dominated accretion flows (DNNB) using spherically symmetric fallback CCSN simulations, computes unoscillated \bar{\nu}_e and \nu_x spectra for different progenitor masses, metallicities, and explosion energies, and folds them with an IMF-weighted cosmic star formation history. It then applies adiabatic MSW flavour conversion with survival probabilities fixed by JUNO mixing parameters (|U_e1|^2 for NO, |U_e3|^2 for IO) via Eq. (9), yielding DNNB \bar{\nu}_e spectra. Event rates are computed for JUNO and Hyper-K over 10 years. The central quantitative result is that NO event rates exceed IO by more than an order of magnitude, and optimistic NO models could produce over 100 IBD events in Hyper-K, while IO is likely undetectable. The paper concludes that DNNB may be detectable in NO and could complement mass-ordering studies.

Significance. If the result holds, this is a useful new prediction: the strong NO/IO ordering contrast emerges naturally from Eq. (9) and the large simulated \bar{\nu}_e/\nu_x ratio, without tuning to DNNB observations. Credit is due for explicitly computing \nu_x spectra instead of assuming thermal scaling, and for stating the relevant limitations (collective oscillations, outflows, metallicity evolution) in the text. However, because the detection claim rests on optimistic upper-limit rates and a simplified oscillation treatment, the quantitative detectability statement is not yet robust; the paper should be read as an illustrative upper-limit scenario until it is checked against existing bounds.

major comments (3)
  1. [Sec. 3, Figs. 5-6] The claim that optimistic NO models yield more than 100 Hyper-K IBD events in 10 years is in tension with the Super-K DSNB limit quoted in the same section (<2 events in 18-26 MeV over 1496 days). Scaling the Hyper-K exposure to Super-K using the numbers in the text (target protons 2.5e34 vs ~1.5e33, livetime ratio 3650/1496) gives roughly 2.4 events at Super-K for a 100-event Hyper-K decade signal, already above the quoted bound; the tension is worse for larger event numbers. The quoted limit is used only as motivation, not applied to the optimistic models. The authors should either rescale the Super-K limit with the appropriate efficiency and energy response for a like-for-like comparison, or explicitly conclude that the optimistic NO models are already constrained by existing data. This does not undermine the relative NO/IO ordering contrast from Eq. (9), but it directly affects the central detectability conclusion.
  2. [Sec. 2.3 and Sec. 4] The central result assumes adiabatic MSW conversion with \bar{p} = |U_e1|^2 (NO) and |U_e3|^2 (IO), neglecting collective neutrino oscillations. Because the DNNB signal is essentially the \bar{\nu}_e survival fraction, any collective \bar{\nu}_e <-> \nu_x swap in the dense accretion disk would change the effective \bar{p} entering Eq. (9) and hence the predicted ordering contrast and event rates. The paper acknowledges this uncertainty but does not quantify it; the detectability statement in the abstract and conclusion is nevertheless built on the simplified conversion. A concrete estimate of the range of possible survival probabilities, or at least an explicit statement that the ordering contrast is conditional on the absence of collective effects, is needed before the detectability conclusion can be accepted.
  3. [Sec. 2.1 and Sec. 4] The NDAF rate uses Mmin and fNDAF from spherically symmetric, piston-driven simulations and deliberately neglects cosmic metallicity evolution; the paper itself states that actual rates are likely lower and that predicted fluxes should be regarded as upper limits. Since event rates scale linearly with RNDAF, the 'may be detectable' claim in the abstract and Sec. 3 relies on the most optimistic upper-limit rate. The abstract and conclusions should carry this caveat explicitly, and the optimistic event numbers should be labelled as upper limits rather than as central expectations.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Sec. 2.3] The notation \nu_x in Eq. (9) should be defined as including \bar{\nu}_\mu and \bar{\nu}_\tau; otherwise the appearance term in the IBD flux is ambiguous.
  2. [Sec. 3] For consistency with Eq. (10), state whether Ndet in Figs. 5 and 6 already includes the signal efficiency \epsilon_sig; the figure captions do not say.
  3. [Sec. 2.3] The JUNO mixing parameters are quoted only as sin^2\theta_12 and sin^2\theta_13; give the resulting numerical values of \bar{p} for NO and IO to help the reader verify Eq. (9).
  4. [Sec. 3] The quoted Super-K DSNB upper limit is from 2009; consider updating to the latest published Super-K limit, which would strengthen the comparison.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the flavour-conversion prediction follows from standard oscillation formulae and computed input spectra, with no fitted target data.

full rationale

The derivation is self-contained and not circular. The DNNB flux in Eq. (1) is built from the cosmic star-formation rate, an IMF, and NDAF occurrence rates; the unoscillated electron-antineutrino and heavy-lepton spectra are computed from NDAF simulations, with the nu_x spectra obtained from the fitting formulae of Xue et al. (2013), and Eq. (9) applies the standard adiabatic MSW survival probabilities with oscillation parameters taken from JUNO and PDG. The normal-versus-inverted-ordering contrast follows arithmetically from the different survival probabilities (|U_e1|^2 versus |U_e3|^2) and the computed ratio of the input spectra; no DNNB observation is fitted, and no predicted event rate is an input to the model. The self-citations, such as Wei et al. (2024) for the CCSN simulations and Xue et al. (2013) for NDAF solutions, are load-bearing in the sense that they provide the simulation inputs, but they do not contain or pre-impose the flavour-conversion result that is the paper's central claim, so the argument does not reduce to its own outputs. The possible tension with the Super-K DSNB upper limit quoted in Sec. 3 is a consistency or calibration concern rather than a circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 7 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim depends on the NDAF population model inherited from earlier simulations, the fitted heavy-lepton cooling and temperature laws, and the simplified adiabatic flavour conversion. The free parameters are the simulation-derived Mmin/fNDAF values and the coefficients of the fit formulae; none are fitted to DNNB observations, so the circularity burden is low. No invented entities are introduced; the DNNB is an aggregate flux, not a new physical object.

free parameters (3)
  • Mmin and fNDAF per metallicity/explosion energy scenario = Mmin = 20-40 M_sun; fNDAF = 3.0%-21.1% (Table 1)
    Set by piston CCSN simulations; directly normalize R_NDAF in Eq. (2) and therefore the DNNB amplitude. No uncertainty is assigned to these numbers.
  • Q_nu_x fit coefficients in Eq. (4) = 39.52, -0.25, 0.88, -1.84, -3.78
    Fitted to the global NDAF solutions of Xue et al. (2013); they set the unoscillated heavy-lepton cooling rate and hence the nu_x flux.
  • T fit coefficients in Eq. (5) = 11.23, -0.04, 0.10, -0.23, -0.86
    Fitted to the same NDAF solutions; they set the temperature of the Fermi-Dirac nu_x spectra.
assumptions (7)
  • domain assumption NDAFs form during fallback accretion in some CCSNe and their neutrino emission follows the adopted NDAF global solutions.
    Invoked in Sec. 2.1 to define R_NDAF and in Sec. 2.2 for spectra; the event rate and emission properties are taken from simulations rather than observations.
  • domain assumption The piston-driven, spherically symmetric CCSN simulations of Wei et al. (2024) give reliable fallback rates and hence Mmin and fNDAF.
    Table 1 and Sec. 2.1; a different explosion model would change the NDAF event rate and the DNNB normalization.
  • domain assumption Heavy-lepton neutrino spectra are Fermi-Dirac with temperature T and cooling rate Q_nu_x from the fits in Eqs. (4)-(5).
    Sec. 2.2; the spectral shape controls the high-energy tail that flavour conversion mixes into the \bar nu_e flux.
  • domain assumption Flavour conversion is adiabatic MSW with \bar p = |U_e1|^2 for NO and |U_e3|^2 for IO; collective and non-adiabatic effects are negligible.
    Eq. (9) and Sec. 4; this is the main theoretical input for the ordering contrast and is explicitly uncertain.
  • domain assumption The mass supply rate at the inner boundary equals the disc accretion rate, i.e., disc outflows are neglected.
    Sec. 2.1 and Sec. 4; outflows would lower neutrino emission, so the predictions are upper limits.
  • domain assumption All progenitors in a given scenario share the same metallicity and explosion energy, and cosmic metallicity evolution is neglected.
    Sec. 2.1; the authors state the metallicity scenarios are illustrative rather than a cosmic average.
  • domain assumption The cosmic SFR, Salpeter IMF, and Lambda-CDM cosmology adopted in Eqs. (1)-(3) adequately describe the source population.
    Sec. 2.1; standard inputs from Y\u00fcksel et al. (2008) and Salpeter (1955); cosmological parameters are fixed.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Impact of Neutrino Flavour Conversion on the Diffuse Neutrino Background from Neutrino-dominated Accretion Flows." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/VTFIBFX6

@misc{pith2026260812177,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Impact of Neutrino Flavour Conversion on the Diffuse Neutrino Background from Neutrino-dominated Accretion Flows},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/VTFIBFX6}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2608.12177}
}
abstract

Neutrino-dominated accretion flows (NDAFs) are believed to form during the fallback accretion phase of some core-collapse supernovae (CCSNe). Such systems produce copious neutrino emission, whose cumulative contribution over cosmic history forms the diffuse NDAF neutrino background (DNNB). As neutrinos propagate from the source to Earth, flavour conversion can significantly modify the observed neutrino spectra and consequently the detectability of the DNNB. In this work, based on fallback CCSN simulations, we investigate the effects of progenitor mass, metallicity, and initial explosion energy on neutrino emission from NDAFs. We calculate the heavy-lepton neutrino ($\nu_x$) spectra from NDAFs and incorporate them into DNNB predictions. We find that the unoscillated $\nu_x$ spectra are more than an order of magnitude lower than those of electron antineutrinos $\bar{\nu}_e$. Using the latest neutrino oscillation parameters reported by the Jiangmen Underground Neutrino Observatory (JUNO), we evaluate the impact of flavour conversion on the DNNB and derive the corresponding spectra for both the normal and inverted mass orderings. We further estimate the expected event numbers in JUNO and Hyper-Kamiokande. We find that the predicted DNNB signal is strongly dependent on the neutrino mass ordering. While the DNNB may be detectable in the normal ordering with next-generation neutrino detectors, the signal is significantly suppressed in the inverted ordering, making detection considerably more challenging.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2608.12177 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Time-integrated unoscillated antineutrino spectra of NDAFs with different masses and metallicities of progenitors. The black, red, and blue curves correspond to progenitor star metallicities of 𝑍/𝑍 = 0, 0.01, and 1, respectively. The solid lines correspond to 𝜈¯e, while the dashed lines represent 𝜈𝑥. The initial explosion energy is 2 𝐵. to initial explosion energies of 2, 4, and 8 𝐵, respectively. As the ex￾plosion … view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. The 𝜈¯𝑒 spectra of the DNNB as a function of neutrino energy. Solid (dashed) lines correspond to the normal ordering (NO) and inverted ordering (IO). Panels (a) and (b) show the effects of progenitor metallicity and initial explosion energy on the DNNB, respectively. and the mixing matrix U can be expressed as 𝑈 = © ­ « 𝑐12𝑐13 𝑠12𝑐13 𝑠13𝑒 −𝑖 𝛿 −𝑠12𝑐23 − 𝑐12𝑠23𝑠13𝑒 𝑖 𝛿 𝑐12𝑐23 − 𝑠12𝑠23𝑠13𝑒 𝑖 𝛿 𝑠23𝑐13 𝑠12𝑠23 − 𝑐12𝑐23𝑠1… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Time-integrated unoscillated antineutrino spectra of NDAFs for dif￾ferent initial explosion energies. The black, red, and blue curves correspond to initial explosion energies of 2, 4, and 8 𝐵, respectively. The solid lines cor￾respond to 𝜈¯e, while the dashed lines represent 𝜈𝑥. The metallicity is set as 𝑍/𝑍 = 0.01. where 4𝑀𝑖 is the mass range of mass bin 𝑖, and 𝐹𝑖(𝐸𝜈) is the neutrino spectrum of an NDAF correspondi… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (3 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: The 𝜈¯𝑒 spectra of the DNNB for the unoscillated, NO, and IO cases with 𝐸 = 4𝐵 and 𝑍/𝑍 = 0.01. The black, red, and blue lines denote the unoscillated, NO, and IO spectra, respectively. where 𝑑Φ0 𝜈¯𝑒 /𝑑𝐸𝜈 and 𝑑Φ0 𝜈𝑥 /𝑑𝐸𝜈 are the unoscillated spectra for 𝜈¯𝑒 and 𝜈𝑥. Poss…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Predicted DNNB event numbers in JUNO over a 10-year observation period. The left and right panels show the effects of progenitor metallicity and initial explosion energy, respectively. Solid bars denote the NO, whereas hatched bars indicate the IO. 0. 1 1 1 0 1 00 1 00…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Same as [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_6.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

79 extracted references · 27 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    arXiv e-prints , keywords =

    Letter of Intent: The Hyper-Kamiokande Experiment --- Detector Design and Physics Potential ---. arXiv e-prints , keywords =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.1109.3262 , archivePrefix =. 1109.3262 , primaryClass =

    arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.1109.3262

  2. [2]

    arXiv e-prints , keywords =

    First measurement of reactor neutrino oscillations at JUNO. arXiv e-prints , keywords =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2511.14593 , archivePrefix =. 2511.14593 , primaryClass =

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2511.14593

  3. [3]

    New Journal of Physics , keywords =

    Relic neutrino background from cosmological supernovae. New Journal of Physics , keywords =. doi:10.1088/1367-2630/6/1/170 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/0410061 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  4. [4]

    , year = 1972, month = dec, volume =

    Rotating Black Holes: Locally Nonrotating Frames, Energy Extraction, and Scalar Synchrotron Radiation. , year = 1972, month = dec, volume =. doi:10.1086/151796 , adsurl =

    doi:10.1086/151796 1972

  5. [5]

    Annual Review of Nuclear and Particle Science , keywords =

    The Diffuse Supernova Neutrino Background. Annual Review of Nuclear and Particle Science , keywords =. doi:10.1146/annurev.nucl.010909.083331 , archivePrefix =. 1004.3311 , primaryClass =

    work page arXiv

  6. [6]

    , keywords =

    Electromagnetic extraction of energy from Kerr black holes. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/179.3.433 , adsurl =

    doi:10.1093/mnras/179.3.433

  7. [7]

    Reviews of Modern Physics , keywords =

    Colloquium: Perspectives on core-collapse supernova theory. Reviews of Modern Physics , keywords =. doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.85.245 , archivePrefix =. 1210.4921 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  8. [8]

    Physical Review , year = 1968, month = oct, volume =

    Global Structure of the Kerr Family of Gravitational Fields. Physical Review , year = 1968, month = oct, volume =. doi:10.1103/PhysRev.174.1559 , adsurl =

    doi:10.1103/physrev.174.1559 1968

Show all 79 references
  1. [9]

    , keywords =

    Neutrino-cooled Accretion Disks around Spinning Black Holes. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/508923 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/0607145 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  2. [10]

    , keywords =

    Identifying the neutrino mass spectrum from a supernova neutrino burst. , keywords =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.62.033007 , archivePrefix =. hep-ph/9907423 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  3. [11]

    , keywords =

    Collective neutrino flavor transformation in supernovae. , keywords =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.74.123004 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/0511275 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  4. [12]

    Annual Review of Nuclear and Particle Science , keywords =

    Collective Neutrino Oscillations. Annual Review of Nuclear and Particle Science , keywords =. doi:10.1146/annurev.nucl.012809.104524 , archivePrefix =. 1001.2799 , primaryClass =

  5. [13]

    , keywords =

    Detecting Accretion Disks in Active Galactic Nuclei. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/pasj/49.2.159 , adsurl =

    doi

  6. [14]

    Journal of High Energy Physics , keywords =

    The fate of hints: updated global analysis of three-flavor neutrino oscillations. Journal of High Energy Physics , keywords =. doi:10.1007/JHEP09(2020)178 , archivePrefix =. 2007.14792 , primaryClass =

    2020 arXiv

  7. [15]

    , keywords =

    Shock waves in supernovae: New implications on the diffuse supernova neutrino background. , keywords =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.81.053002 , archivePrefix =. 0906.5294 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  8. [16]

    , keywords =

    Neutrino-dominated Accretion Models for Gamma-Ray Bursts: Effects of General Relativity and Neutrino Opacity. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/505140 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/0604370 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  9. [17]

    , keywords =

    Mechanism of Outflows in Accretion System: Advective Cooling cannot Balance Viscous Heating?. , keywords =. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/799/1/71 , archivePrefix =. 1411.3965 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  10. [18]

    , keywords =

    Nucleosynthesis and Evolution of Massive Metal-free Stars. , keywords =. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/724/1/341 , archivePrefix =. 0803.3161 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  11. [19]

    , keywords =

    On the Normalization of the Cosmic Star Formation History. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/506610 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/0601463 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  12. [20]

    , keywords =

    Diffuse supernova neutrino background is detectable in Super-Kamiokande. , keywords =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.79.083013 , archivePrefix =. 0812.3157 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  13. [21]

    , keywords =

    Time Evolution of Flares in GRB 130925A: Jet Precession in a Black Hole Accretion System. , keywords =. doi:10.1088/2041-8205/781/1/L19 , archivePrefix =. 1401.2699 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  14. [22]

    , keywords =

    Instabilities in the Time-Dependent Neutrino Disk in Gamma-Ray Bursts. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/518761 , archivePrefix =. 0704.1325 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  15. [23]

    Annual Review of Nuclear and Particle Science , keywords =

    Explosion Mechanisms of Core-Collapse Supernovae. Annual Review of Nuclear and Particle Science , keywords =. doi:10.1146/annurev-nucl-102711-094901 , archivePrefix =. 1206.2503 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  16. [24]

    Handbook of Supernovae , year = 2017, editor =

    Neutrino Emission from Supernovae. Handbook of Supernovae , year = 2017, editor =. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-21846-5_4 , adsurl =

    2017 doi

  17. [25]

    Progress in Particle and Nuclear Physics , keywords =

    JUNO physics and detector. Progress in Particle and Nuclear Physics , keywords =. doi:10.1016/j.ppnp.2021.103927 , archivePrefix =. 2104.02565 , primaryClass =

    2021

  18. [26]

    Black-Hole Accretion Disks --- Towards a New Paradigm ---

  19. [27]

    , keywords =

    Neutrino-cooled Accretion Disk and Its Stability. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/517985 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/0702630 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  20. [28]

    , keywords =

    Can Neutrino-cooled Accretion Disks Be an Origin of Gamma-Ray Bursts?. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/342166 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/0203177 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  21. [29]

    , keywords =

    Stellar Collapse Diversity and the Diffuse Supernova Neutrino Background. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/abd54e , archivePrefix =. 2010.04728 , primaryClass =

    2010 arXiv

  22. [30]

    Journal of Korean Physical Society , keywords =

    Evolution of a rotating black hole with a magnetized accretion disk. Journal of Korean Physical Society , keywords =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.astro-ph/0008360 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/0008360 , primaryClass =

    doi arXiv

  23. [31]

    , keywords =

    The Blandford-Znajek process as a central engine for a gamma-ray burst. , keywords =. doi:10.1016/S0370-1573(99)00084-8 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/9906213 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  24. [32]

    , keywords =

    Dynamical Evolution of Neutrino-cooled Accretion Disks: Detailed Microphysics, Lepton-driven Convection, and Global Energetics. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/432373 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/0506121 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  25. [33]

    , keywords =

    Magnetically Torqued Neutrino-dominated Accretion Flows for Gamma-ray Bursts. , keywords =. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/700/2/1970 , archivePrefix =. 0906.1635 , primaryClass =

    1970 arXiv

  26. [34]

    , keywords =

    Multitemperature Blackbody Spectrum of a Thin Accretion Disk around a Kerr Black Hole: Model Computations and Comparison with Observations. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/428089 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/0411583 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  27. [35]

    , keywords =

    Black hole growths in gamma-ray bursts driven by the Blandford-Znajek mechanism. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stad3728 , archivePrefix =. 2312.03109 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  28. [36]

    Universe , keywords =

    Prospects for the Detection of the Diffuse Supernova Neutrino Background with the Experiments SK-Gd and JUNO. Universe , keywords =. doi:10.3390/universe8030181 , archivePrefix =. 2201.12920 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  29. [37]

    , keywords =

    Detectable MeV neutrinos from black hole neutrino-dominated accretion flows. , keywords =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.93.123004 , archivePrefix =. 1512.07203 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  30. [38]

    , keywords =

    Structure and Luminosity of Neutrino-cooled Accretion Disks. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/513689 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/0702186 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  31. [39]

    , keywords =

    Constraints on the Mass Accretion Rate of Neutrino-cooled Disks in Gamma-Ray Bursts. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/527670 , archivePrefix =. 0712.4107 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  32. [40]

    , keywords =

    Self-gravity in Neutrino-dominated Accretion Disks. , keywords =. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/791/1/69 , archivePrefix =. 1407.0790 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  33. [41]

    , keywords =

    Neutrino-dominated Accretion Flows: A Second Nucleosynthesis Factory in Core-collapse Supernovae and Regulating the Iron Markets in Galaxies. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac1428 , archivePrefix =. 2008.05087 , primaryClass =

    2008 arXiv

  34. [42]

    , keywords =

    Final Compact Remnants in Core-collapse Supernovae from 20 to 40 M _ ☉ : The Lower Mass Gap. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/abd24e , archivePrefix =. 2011.14361 , primaryClass =

    2011 arXiv

  35. [43]

    , keywords =

    Neutrino-dominated accretion flows as the central engine of gamma-ray bursts. , keywords =. doi:10.1016/j.newar.2017.07.001 , archivePrefix =. 1705.05516 , primaryClass =

    2017 arXiv

  36. [44]

    Astroparticle Physics , keywords =

    Diffuse supernova neutrinos at underground laboratories. Astroparticle Physics , keywords =. doi:10.1016/j.astropartphys.2016.02.005 , archivePrefix =. 1007.3252 , primaryClass =

    2016 arXiv

  37. [45]

    , keywords =

    Collapsars: Gamma-Ray Bursts and Explosions in ``Failed Supernovae''. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/307790 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/9810274 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  38. [46]

    Soviet Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Physics , year = 1986, month = jul, volume =

    Neutrino oscillations in a variable-density medium and u-bursts due to the gravitational collapse of stars. Soviet Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Physics , year = 1986, month = jul, volume =

    1986

  39. [47]

    Nuovo Cimento Rivista Serie , keywords =

    Supernova neutrinos: production, oscillations and detection. Nuovo Cimento Rivista Serie , keywords =. doi:10.1393/ncr/i2016-10120-8 , archivePrefix =. 1508.00785 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  40. [48]

    , keywords =

    Self-induced flavor instabilities of a dense neutrino stream in a two-dimensional model. , keywords =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.92.021702 , archivePrefix =. 1503.03485 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  41. [49]

    , keywords =

    Measuring the supernova unknowns at the next-generation neutrino telescopes through the diffuse neutrino background. , keywords =. doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2018/05/066 , archivePrefix =. 1804.03157 , primaryClass =

    2018 arXiv

  42. [50]

    Astroparticle Physics , keywords =

    Gamma-ray burst neutrino background and star formation history in the universe. Astroparticle Physics , keywords =. doi:10.1016/S0927-6505(02)00180-9 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/0203481 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  43. [51]

    , keywords =

    Accretion Models of Gamma-Ray Bursts. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/322267 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/0103360 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  44. [52]

    , keywords =

    Hyperaccreting Black Holes and Gamma-Ray Bursts. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/307259 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/9807028 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  45. [53]

    , keywords =

    Revisiting Black Hole Hyperaccretion in the Center of Gamma-Ray Bursts for the Lower Mass Gap. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac5f4b , archivePrefix =. 2203.09793 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  46. [54]

    , keywords =

    Optical Caustics in a Kerr Spacetime and the Origin of Rapid X-Ray Variability in Active Galactic Nuclei. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/173625 , adsurl =

    doi

  47. [55]

    , keywords =

    Multiwavelength Constraints on the Cosmic Star Formation History from Spectroscopy: The Rest-Frame Ultraviolet, H , and Infrared Luminosity Functions at Redshifts 1.9 lesssim z lesssim 3.4. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/521105 , archivePrefix =. 0706.4091 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  48. [56]

    , keywords =

    The Evolution of the Star Formation Rate of Galaxies at 0.0 <= z <= 1.2. , keywords =. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/718/2/1171 , archivePrefix =. 1006.4359 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  49. [57]

    , year = 1955, month = jan, volume =

    The Luminosity Function and Stellar Evolution. , year = 1955, month = jan, volume =. doi:10.1086/145971 , adsurl =

    1955 doi

  50. [58]

    , keywords =

    Black hole accretion disk diffuse neutrino background. , keywords =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.100.043008 , archivePrefix =. 1808.03627 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  51. [59]

    , keywords =

    Testing black hole neutrino-dominated accretion discs for long-duration gamma-ray bursts. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stw427 , archivePrefix =. 1602.06691 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  52. [60]

    , keywords =

    Evolutions of Stellar-mass Black Hole Hyperaccretion Systems in the Center of Gamma-Ray Bursts. , keywords =. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/815/1/54 , archivePrefix =. 1512.08028 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  53. [61]

    Physics Letters B , keywords =

    Precise quasielastic neutrino/nucleon cross-section. Physics Letters B , keywords =. doi:10.1016/S0370-2693(03)00616-6 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/0302055 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  54. [62]

    arXiv e-prints , keywords =

    Neutrinos from Diffuse Supernova Background. arXiv e-prints , keywords =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2207.09632 , archivePrefix =. 2207.09632 , primaryClass =

    doi

  55. [63]

    Reviews of Modern Physics , keywords =

    Grand unified neutrino spectrum at Earth: Sources and spectral components. Reviews of Modern Physics , keywords =. doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.92.045006 , archivePrefix =. 1910.11878 , primaryClass =

    1910 arXiv

  56. [64]

    , keywords =

    Angular distribution of neutron inverse beta decay, ̄ _ e +p-->e ^ + +n. , keywords =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.60.053003 , archivePrefix =. hep-ph/9903554 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  57. [65]

    , keywords =

    Presupernova evolution of massive stars. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/156569 , adsurl =

    doi

  58. [66]

    Black Hole Hyperaccretion in Collapsars. I. MeV Neutrinos. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab2187 , archivePrefix =. 1905.04850 , primaryClass =

    1905 arXiv

  59. [67]

    , keywords =

    Anisotropic neutrinos and gravitational waves from black hole neutrino-dominated accretion flows in fallback core-collapse supernovae. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stab2153 , archivePrefix =. 2107.11087 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  60. [68]

    , keywords =

    Contribution of Neutrino-dominated Accretion Flows to the Cosmic MeV Neutrino Background. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad3824 , archivePrefix =. 2403.16856 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  61. [69]

    , keywords =

    Stochastic Gravitational Wave Background from Cosmological Neutrino-dominated Accretion Flows. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad6b0b , archivePrefix =. 2408.00546 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  62. [70]

    , keywords =

    An Extension of the Athena++ Code Framework for GRMHD Based on Advanced Riemann Solvers and Staggered-mesh Constrained Transport. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/0067-0049/225/2/22 , archivePrefix =. 1511.00943 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  63. [71]

    , year = 1978, month = may, volume =

    Neutrino oscillations in matter. , year = 1978, month = may, volume =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.17.2369 , adsurl =

    1978 doi

  64. [72]

    , keywords =

    Nucleosynthesis and remnants in massive stars of solar metallicity. , keywords =. doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2007.02.009 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/0702176 , primaryClass =

    2007 arXiv

  65. [73]

    , keywords =

    Gamma-Ray Bursts from Stellar Mass Accretion Disks around Black Holes. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/172359 , adsurl =

    doi

  66. [74]

    The Evolution and Explosion of Massive Stars. II. Explosive Hydrodynamics and Nucleosynthesis. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/192237 , adsurl =

    doi

  67. [75]

    Reviews of Modern Physics , keywords =

    The evolution and explosion of massive stars. Reviews of Modern Physics , keywords =. doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.74.1015 , adsurl =

    doi

  68. [76]

    Progress of Theoretical and Experimental Physics , year = 2022, month = aug, volume =

    Review of Particle Physics. Progress of Theoretical and Experimental Physics , year = 2022, month = aug, volume =. doi:10.1093/ptep/ptac097 , adsurl =

    2022 doi

  69. [77]

    , keywords =

    Giant X-Ray Bump in GRB 121027A: Evidence for Fall-back Disk Accretion. , keywords =. doi:10.1088/2041-8205/767/2/L36 , archivePrefix =. 1302.4878 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  70. [78]

    , keywords =

    Relativistic Global Solutions of Neutrino-dominated Accretion Flows. , keywords =. doi:10.1088/0067-0049/207/2/23 , archivePrefix =. 1306.0655 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  71. [79]

    , keywords =

    Revealing the High-Redshift Star Formation Rate with Gamma-Ray Bursts. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/591449 , archivePrefix =. 0804.4008 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 16, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.