Higher-order variation and pathwise Ito calculus on manifolds

Rama Cont

Higher-order variation and pathwise Ito calculus on manifolds

T0 review · 0 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-16 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The paper proves an intrinsic change-of-variable (Itô-type) formula for smooth functions of continuous manifold-valued paths with finite p-th order variation along a partition sequence, with the p-th variation tensor as the sole…

desk verdict A clean, self-contained pathwise Itô calculus on manifolds for arbitrary p; the central theorem is sound, and the strong V^p hypothesis is honestly flagged rather than a hidden flaw. read the letter →

arxiv 2608.12225 v1 pith:2Z23RHCE submitted 2026-08-12 math.PR math.DG

Rama Cont This is my paper · ORCID

classification math.PRmath.DG MSC 60H1058A2058C2058C2558C3549Q1560L99

keywords pathwiseItôcalculushigher-ordervariationmanifold-valuedpathsp-thtensorcovariantTaylorexpansionaffineconnectionfractionalBrownianmotionjetbundles

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper develops an intrinsic, purely pathwise calculus for smooth functions of continuous paths on a smooth manifold, with no probabilistic structure attached. Its central result is a change-of-variable formula for any test function f of class C^p: along a path X with finite p-th order variation, f(X_T)-f(X_0) equals the limit of covariant left Taylor sums of orders 1 through p-1 plus (1/p!) times the integral of the p-th covariant derivative of f against a p-th variation tensor [X]^p_π. For p=2 this reduces to Föllmer's pathwise Itô formula on Euclidean space, now on manifolds, and the construction requires only an affine connection, not rough-path enhancements. A sympathetic reader would care because it extends Itô-type calculus to arbitrarily rough manifold-valued paths, including fractional Brownian lifts and deterministic fractal paths, and it clarifies the geometric content of the Itô correction term.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the p-th variation tensor [X]^p_π: a symmetric p-contravariant tensor-valued Radon measure along the path, obtained as the weak-* limit of atomic measures ∑ (Δ_i^π X)^{⊗p} δ_{t_i}, where increments are taken via an admissible increment map such as the logarithmic increment $exp^{{-1}}$_{X_{t_i}}(X_{t_{i+1}}). The paper proves the limiting measure is independent of the increment map, so the object is intrinsic to (X,π). The companion mechanism is the covariant Taylor expansion along geodesics: f(exp_x v)=Σ_{k=0}^p (1/k!)∇^{(k)}f_x($v^{{⊗k}}$) + o(|v|^p), uniformly on compact sets, which turns each discrete increment into a p-th order differential expression and identifies the p-th variation tensor as the canonical highest-order correction. A connection supplies the splitting of higher-order tangent vectors that makes the lower-order compensated sums well-defined.

What would settle it

A concrete test: take the Schied–Zhang cubic-variation path w lifted to the sphere via the exponential map, then compute the weak-* limits of ∑($exp^{{-1}}$_{X_{t_i}}(X_{t_{i+1}}))^{⊗3} δ_{t_i} and of ∑(P_{X_{t_i}}(X_{t_{i+1}}-X_{t_i}))^{⊗3} δ_{t_i} along the same ternary partitions, using orthogonal projection as a second admissible increment map; Proposition 2.5 predicts identical limits, so a numerical discrepancy would falsify the independence claim that underlies the change-of-variable formula.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the discovery is Theorem 4.1: for any integer p≥2, any continuous path X in V^p(M,π) — meaning the p-th order increment sums are uniformly bounded and the atomic measures of p-fold tensor increments converge weak-* to a symmetric tensor measure [X]^p_π along the same partition sequence — and any f∈C^p(M), the covariant left Taylor sums of orders 1,...,p-1 converge, and f(X_T)-f(X_0) equals their limit plus (1/p!)∫⟨∇^{(p)}f(X_t), d[X]^p_{π,t}⟩. The p-th variation tensor is defined intrinsically, independent of the admissible increment map used to form increments, and transforms under smooth maps by the p-th tensor power of the differential. When p=2 this is exactly Föllmer's pathwise Itô formula lifted to manifolds; for general p it gives a higher-order Itô-type calculus valid for paths of arbitrary low regularity.

Load-bearing premise

Everything in the main theorem rests on the assumption that the path's p-th order increment sums are uniformly bounded and the atomic p-tensor measures converge weak-* along the chosen partition sequence; continuity and ordinary finite p-variation alone do not guarantee this.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

For p=2, the formula recovers Föllmer's pathwise Itô formula on manifolds, with the second variation tensor playing the role of the quadratic variation.
The p-th variation tensor of a transformed path Φ∘X is the fiberwise pushforward (DΦ)^{⊗p}[X]^p_π, making the change-of-variable formula functorial under smooth maps.
The pathwise integral defined by the compensated lower-order sums inherits an isometry property: for even p, its p-th variation is ⟨(df)^{⊗p}, d[X]^p_π⟩.
For fractional Brownian motion with Hurst parameter H=1/p lifted by the exponential map, the p-th variation density is (D exp)^{⊗p} m_p dt, producing explicit higher-order corrections that encode curvature on S^2, H^2, and the nonlinear structure of SO(3).
A deterministic fractal path on the sphere with non-zero cubic variation satisfies the formula with an explicit cubic correction term.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The partition-dependence of V^p(M,π) suggests a natural test question: whether the change-of-variable formula is invariant across partition sequences when the p-th variation tensor exists along each, a property the paper does not establish.
Because the construction uses only geodesics and symmetrized covariant derivatives, one could run the entire theory with a connection carrying torsion and expect identical formulas; the paper's SO(3) example hints at this, but the general torsional case is not written out.
The examples are mostly exponential lifts of Gaussian or fractal drivers; a reader interested in the scope could test the formulas on other deterministic non-semimartingales, such as sums of Weierstrass-type oscillations, to see whether weak-* convergence of tensor measures is the effective regularity condition.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

Rama Cont's paper gives the manifold analogue of the p-th variation calculus he and Perkowski built in Euclidean space. That is a genuinely missing piece: Föllmer gives Itô calculus pathwise in R^d, Schwartz–Émery give stochastic second-order geometry, and rough-path manifold constructions need enhancements. This paper supplies the intrinsic object—the p-th variation tensor as a symmetric tensor measure along the path—and proves a change-of-variable formula for C^p functions. I read the proof carefully; it holds together. The covariant Taylor expansion with uniform remainder is done cleanly; the telescoping and vanishing remainder are standard but handled with the right hypotheses. The invariance under admissible increment maps (Prop 2.5) and the transformation rule under smooth maps (Prop 2.11) are proved in full. The p=2 check against Föllmer's formula is a nice external benchmark.

The main soft spot is the definition of V^p(M,π): finite p-energy plus weak-* convergence of the atomic p-increment measure along the same partition sequence. That is a strong assumption and not implied by continuity or ordinary finite p-variation. The paper says so explicitly and gives examples (fBm with H=1/p, the Schied–Zhang fractal, and their manifold lifts) where it holds. So it is a real restriction on scope, but not a flaw in the theorem. The partition dependence noted in Remark 4.5 is standard for Föllmer-type calculus and does not invalidate anything.

The examples are useful: fBm lifted to S^2, H^2, SO(3) show how curvature and the exponential map appear in the correction terms. The fractal cubic-variation example on S^2 is a nice sanity check that odd-order variation can be non-trivial. Proposition 6.1 (almost-sure variation tensor of fBm with H=1/p) has a full proof via Hermite expansions and Borel–Cantelli; I see no gap.

Who is this for? Anyone working on pathwise stochastic analysis on manifolds, or on rough-path-free approaches to irregular paths. The paper deserves a serious referee. I would accept it for review; my own recommendation would be accept after minor revision—mostly clarifying that the V^p condition is not verified for generic paths and maybe hedging the word "arbitrary regularity" in the abstract, since the regularity is controlled by p-energy, not truly arbitrary.

Referee Report

0 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper develops an intrinsic pathwise calculus for continuous paths on smooth manifolds with finite p-th order variation along a fixed partition sequence. It introduces admissible increment maps, defines the p-th variation tensor as a weak-* limit of atomic symmetric tensor measures, proves independence of the increment map and naturality under smooth maps, establishes a uniform covariant Taylor expansion, and derives a p-th order change-of-variable formula (Theorem 4.1) expressing f(X_T)-f(X_0) as the limit of covariant left Taylor sums of orders 1,...,p-1 plus a contraction of the p-th covariant derivative with the p-th variation tensor. It then interprets the formula in terms of higher-order tangent geometry (Pohl jets, connection splitting) and gives examples: Riemannian Brownian motion (p=2), exponential lifts of fractional Brownian motion with H=1/p, a Schied-Zhang fractal on the sphere, constant-curvature spaces, and fractional rotations on SO(3).

Significance. The central theorem is substantial: it gives a genuinely intrinsic higher-order analogue of Föllmer's pathwise Itô calculus on manifolds without rough-path enhancements. The main line of proof is complete: the covariant Taylor remainder is controlled uniformly by the finite p-energy, the highest-order term converges by the defining weak-* convergence of the variation tensor, and the remainder vanishes. The independence lemma (Prop 2.5), transformation rule (Prop 2.11), and the almost-sure variation computation for fractional Brownian motion (Prop 6.1, proved in Appendix A) are concrete and carefully argued. The paper is honest about the main hypothesis: membership in V^p(M,π) is a substantive condition on the path-partition pair and is not implied by continuity or ordinary finite p-variation; this is acknowledged and illustrated by nontrivial examples. I found no circularity: no constants are fitted and the p=2 case is checked against Föllmer's formula.

minor comments (5)

[Section 2.2, Definition 2.3] The definition of V^p(M,π) leaves implicit the role of the admissible increment map; it should state explicitly that finiteness of p-energy and weak-* convergence are required for some admissible increment map, with Proposition 2.5 then ensuring independence of the choice.
[Appendix A, proof of Proposition 6.1] The line 'Expand eFA in the multivariate Hermite basis' is garbled; it should read 'Expand the mean-zero polynomial F̃_A(z)=F_A(z)-A(m_p) in the multivariate Hermite basis'.
[Section 4.2, Proposition 4.6] The definition of I_t^∇ for arbitrary t in [0,T] should specify how Theorem 4.1 is applied on the subinterval [0,t]; the natural choice is the induced partition sequence obtained by inserting t, and one should note that the restriction of X to [0,t] belongs to V^p(M,π^t).
[Section 5.4, Proposition 5.3] The proof that D^(p,∇)_{π,X}(f) depends only on the reduced p-jet is compressed into a single reference to Proposition 5.1; please spell out that the connection-dependent covariant derivatives are the components of the reduced p-jet under the splitting and that the pathwise limiting construction factors through the jet section.
[Section 6.3] The claim that the absolute cubic variation of the Schied-Zhang path is finite and non-zero should be supported by a precise citation or a short argument, since the quoted theorem states the signed variation and the finiteness of total variation is needed for the weak-* convergence in V^p.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the change-of-variable formula is derived from covariant Taylor expansion under an explicit V^p hypothesis, not assumed as an input.

full rationale

The derivation is self-contained rather than circular. The central object, the p-th variation tensor [X]^p_π, is defined in Definition 2.3 as a weak-* limit of atomic p-increment measures along the partition sequence, and Proposition 2.5 proves that this limit is independent of the admissible increment map; it is not tuned to any target formula. Theorem 4.1 is proved by applying the covariant Taylor expansion (Theorem 3.2) along geodesic increments, summing over the partition, and using the definition of [X]^p_π plus the uniform p-energy bound to control the remainder; equation (32) is the resulting identity, not an assumed input. The pathwise integral in (31) is defined as the limit of covariant left Taylor sums and is shown to converge as a consequence of the same computation. No parameter is fitted and no subsequence is calibrated to force the conclusion. Self-citations to Cont–Perkowski [11] are contextual, referencing the Euclidean analogue and the same compensation mechanism, but they are not used to justify the manifold theorem. The p=2 case is checked against Föllmer's formula, the Brownian-motion isometry against the classical Itô isometry, and the fractional-Brownian variation tensor is proved in Appendix A from Hermite expansions and hypercontractivity; these are external or independently proved benchmarks. The restrictiveness of the V^p(M,π) hypothesis is explicitly acknowledged and is a scope condition, not a circular assumption.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The ledger reflects the paper's economy: no free parameters are fitted to make the theorem work. The p-th variation tensor is defined by a limiting procedure rather than postulated. The load-bearing assumptions are the regularity class V^p(M,π) and the availability of a connection and exponential map; the examples additionally use external variation facts. No invented entities are introduced.

assumptions (4)

domain assumption The path X belongs to the class V^p(M,π): finite p-energy plus weak-* convergence of the atomic p-increment tensor measures along the partition sequence π.
Definition 2.2 and Definition 2.3, equations (7)-(9). Theorem 4.1 is conditional on this membership.
domain assumption The manifold carries a smooth affine connection whose exponential map is defined on a neighborhood of the zero section, and test functions belong to C^p(M).
Section 2 and Theorem 3.2 use geodesic logarithmic increments and covariant Taylor expansion.
standard math Standard higher-order tangent and jet bundle geometry: the filtration of τ^(p)M by lower orders with quotient Sym^p(TM), and the connection-dependent splitting of jets.
Section 5, especially equations (44)-(46) and Proposition 5.1, relies on Pohl/Ehresmann jet theory and Schwartz-Émery geometry as established background.
domain assumption External example facts: Riemannian Brownian motion has pathwise quadratic variation g^{-1}dt, and the Schied-Zhang fractal path has signed cubic variation (27/256)dt.
Section 6.1 and 6.3 cite these results; they are not rederived. The fBm variation result, by contrast, is proved in Appendix A.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Higher-order variation and pathwise Ito calculus on manifolds." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/2Z23RHCE

@misc{pith2026260812225,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Higher-order variation and pathwise Ito calculus on manifolds},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/2Z23RHCE}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2608.12225}
}

abstract

We develop an intrinsic calculus for smooth functions of paths of arbitrarily low regularity on smooth manifolds and define pathwise integrals for exact differential forms along such paths. The regularity of paths is defined in terms of $p$-th order variation along a sequence of partitions, for arbitrary integer $p$. We define the $p$-th variation tensor of a path along a sequence of partitions as a local symmetric tensor measure along the path, and derive a change of variable formula for smooth functions of paths with finite $p$-th variation. For $p=2$, our results extend H. F\"ollmer's pathwise It\^o calculus to manifold-valued paths. Our construction only requires an affine connection on the manifold and may be viewed as a higher-order analogue of L. Schwartz's second-order differential geometry. The connection provides a splitting of higher-order tangent vectors into symmetric tensor components and leads to a geometric transfer principle: the change-of-variable formula defines an intrinsic, connection-independent functional of the reduced $p$-jet of the test function, whose canonical highest-order component is determined by the $p$-th variation tensor. Although our results are purely geometric, they apply to manifold-valued stochastic processes with highly irregular paths and yield a higher-order It\^o-type calculus for such processes. We illustrate this calculus for exponential lifts of fractional Brownian motions to Riemannian manifolds and Lie groups.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2608.12225 by the authors.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

13 extracted references · 12 canonical work pages

[1]

Ananova and R

[1]A. Ananova and R. Cont,Pathwise integration with respect to paths of finite quadratic variation, Journal de Math´ ematiques Pures et Appliqu´ ees, 107 (2017), pp. 737–757. 40 [2]J. Armstrong, D. Brigo, T. Cass, and E. Rossi Ferrucci,Non-geometric rough paths on manifolds, Journal of the London Mathematical Society, 106 (2022), pp. 756–817. [3]I. G. Avr...

work page 2017
[9]

It ˆo,Stochastic differential equations in a differentiable manifold, Nagoya Mathe- matical Journal, 1 (1950), pp

[24]K. It ˆo,Stochastic differential equations in a differentiable manifold, Nagoya Mathe- matical Journal, 1 (1950), pp. 35–47. [25]K. It ˆo,The Brownian motion and tensor fields on Riemannian manifold, in Proc. Internat. Congr. Mathematicians (Stockholm), Inst. Mittag-Leffler, 1963, pp. 536–539. [26]S. Kobayashi and K. Nomizu,Foundations of differential...

work page 1950
[12]

Schied and Z

[34]A. Schied and Z. Zhang,On the p-th variation of a class of fractal functions, Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society, 148 (2020), pp. 5399–5412. [35]L. Schwartz,G´ eom´ etrie diff´ erentielle du 2` eme ordre, semi-martingales et ´ equations diff´ erentielles stochastiques sur une vari´ et´ e diff´ erentielle, S´ eminaire de probabilit´ es de...

work page 2020
[227]

[29]R. S. Palais,Differential operators on vector bundles, in: Seminar on the Atiyah- Singer index theorem, vol. No. 57 of Annals of Mathematics Studies, Princeton Uni- versity Press, Princeton, NJ, 1965, ch. IV, pp. 51–94. [30]W. F. Pohl,Differential geometry of higher order, Topology, 1 (1962), pp. 169–211. [31]M. Pratelli,A remark on the1/H-variation o...

work page 1962
[522]

Cont and N

[11]R. Cont and N. Perkowski,Pathwise integration and change of variable formulas for continuous paths with arbitrary regularity, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. Ser. B, 6 (2019), pp. 161–186. [12]C. Ehresmann,Les prolongements d’une vari´ et´ e diff´ erentiable. I. Calcul des jets, prolongement principal, C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris, 233 (1951), pp. 598–600. [13]C. E...

work page 2019
[1661]

F ¨ollmer,Calcul d’Itˆ o sans probabilit´ es, in S´ eminaire de Probabilit´ es, XV (Univ

[20]H. F ¨ollmer,Calcul d’Itˆ o sans probabilit´ es, in S´ eminaire de Probabilit´ es, XV (Univ. Strasbourg, 1979/1980), vol. 850 of Lecture Notes in Math., Springer, Berlin, 1981, pp. 143–150. [21]P. K. Friz and M. Hairer,A course on rough paths, Universitext, Springer,

work page 1979
[1984]

Widom,A complete symbolic calculus for pseudodifferential operators, Bulletin des Sciences Math´ ematiques, 104 (1980), pp

[37]H. Widom,A complete symbolic calculus for pseudodifferential operators, Bulletin des Sciences Math´ ematiques, 104 (1980), pp. 19–63. A Proof of Proposition 6.1 Proof.Lett N i := iT N,0≤i≤N,and define the normalized increments ZN i := N T H XH tN i+1 −X H tN i ,0≤i<N. For eachN, the random vectorsZ N i are centered Gaussian with E h ZN,a i ZN,b j i =δ...

work page 1980
[1989]

With an appendix by P.-A. Meyer. [18]M. ´Emery,On two transfer principles in stochastic differential geometry, in S´ eminaire de Probabilit´ es XXIV 1988/89, Springer, 2006, pp. 407–441. [19]E. Ferrucci,A transfer principle for branched rough paths, Annales de l’Institut Henri Poincar´ e, Probabilit´ es et Statistiques, 61 (2025), pp. 1622 –

work page 2025

Show all 13 references

[1996]

Meyer,G´ eometrie diff´ erentielle stochastique, in Ast´ erisque, vol

[27]P.-A. Meyer,G´ eometrie diff´ erentielle stochastique, in Ast´ erisque, vol. 131, 1985, pp. 107–114. Colloque en l’Honneur de Laurent Schwartz. [28]E. Nelson,The free Markoff field, Journal of Functional Analysis, 12 (1973), pp. 211–

1973
[2000]

Baudoin and L

[4]F. Baudoin and L. Coutin,Self-similarity and fractional Brownian motion on Lie groups, Electronic Journal of Probability, 13 (2008), pp. 1120 –

2008
[2007]

[16]K. D. Elworthy and X.-M. Li,Geometric stochastic analysis on path spaces, in Proceedings of the International Congress of Mathematicians (ICM) Madrid 2006, European Mathematical Society, 2007, pp. 575–594. 41 [17]M. ´Emery,Stochastic calculus in manifolds, Universitext, Sp...

2006
[2014]

Hairer and H

[22]M. Hairer and H. Singh,Regularity structures on manifolds and vector bundles, arXiv:2308.05049 [math.PR], (2023). [23]N. Ikeda and S. Watanabe,Stochastic differential equations and diffusion pro- cesses, North-Holland Publishing Co., Amsterdam; Kodansha, Ltd., Tokyo, sec- ond ed.,

2023 arXiv
[2022]

Brena and N

[7]C. Brena and N. Gigli,Local vector measures, Journal of Functional Analysis, 286 (2024), p. 110202. [8]T. Cass, B. K. Driver, and C. Litterer,Constrained rough paths, Proceedings of the London Mathematical Society, 111 (2015), pp. 1471–1518. [9]T. Cass, C. Litterer, and T. ...

2024

Pith tools

Reviewed August 16, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [1]

Ananova and R

[1]A. Ananova and R. Cont,Pathwise integration with respect to paths of finite quadratic variation, Journal de Math´ ematiques Pures et Appliqu´ ees, 107 (2017), pp. 737–757. 40 [2]J. Armstrong, D. Brigo, T. Cass, and E. Rossi Ferrucci,Non-geometric rough paths on manifolds, Journal of the London Mathematical Society, 106 (2022), pp. 756–817. [3]I. G. Avr...

work page 2017

[2] [9]

It ˆo,Stochastic differential equations in a differentiable manifold, Nagoya Mathe- matical Journal, 1 (1950), pp

[24]K. It ˆo,Stochastic differential equations in a differentiable manifold, Nagoya Mathe- matical Journal, 1 (1950), pp. 35–47. [25]K. It ˆo,The Brownian motion and tensor fields on Riemannian manifold, in Proc. Internat. Congr. Mathematicians (Stockholm), Inst. Mittag-Leffler, 1963, pp. 536–539. [26]S. Kobayashi and K. Nomizu,Foundations of differential...

work page 1950

[3] [12]

Schied and Z

[34]A. Schied and Z. Zhang,On the p-th variation of a class of fractal functions, Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society, 148 (2020), pp. 5399–5412. [35]L. Schwartz,G´ eom´ etrie diff´ erentielle du 2` eme ordre, semi-martingales et ´ equations diff´ erentielles stochastiques sur une vari´ et´ e diff´ erentielle, S´ eminaire de probabilit´ es de...

work page 2020

[4] [227]

[29]R. S. Palais,Differential operators on vector bundles, in: Seminar on the Atiyah- Singer index theorem, vol. No. 57 of Annals of Mathematics Studies, Princeton Uni- versity Press, Princeton, NJ, 1965, ch. IV, pp. 51–94. [30]W. F. Pohl,Differential geometry of higher order, Topology, 1 (1962), pp. 169–211. [31]M. Pratelli,A remark on the1/H-variation o...

work page 1962

[5] [522]

Cont and N

[11]R. Cont and N. Perkowski,Pathwise integration and change of variable formulas for continuous paths with arbitrary regularity, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. Ser. B, 6 (2019), pp. 161–186. [12]C. Ehresmann,Les prolongements d’une vari´ et´ e diff´ erentiable. I. Calcul des jets, prolongement principal, C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris, 233 (1951), pp. 598–600. [13]C. E...

work page 2019

[6] [1661]

F ¨ollmer,Calcul d’Itˆ o sans probabilit´ es, in S´ eminaire de Probabilit´ es, XV (Univ

[20]H. F ¨ollmer,Calcul d’Itˆ o sans probabilit´ es, in S´ eminaire de Probabilit´ es, XV (Univ. Strasbourg, 1979/1980), vol. 850 of Lecture Notes in Math., Springer, Berlin, 1981, pp. 143–150. [21]P. K. Friz and M. Hairer,A course on rough paths, Universitext, Springer,

work page 1979

[7] [1984]

Widom,A complete symbolic calculus for pseudodifferential operators, Bulletin des Sciences Math´ ematiques, 104 (1980), pp

[37]H. Widom,A complete symbolic calculus for pseudodifferential operators, Bulletin des Sciences Math´ ematiques, 104 (1980), pp. 19–63. A Proof of Proposition 6.1 Proof.Lett N i := iT N,0≤i≤N,and define the normalized increments ZN i := N T H XH tN i+1 −X H tN i ,0≤i<N. For eachN, the random vectorsZ N i are centered Gaussian with E h ZN,a i ZN,b j i =δ...

work page 1980

[8] [1989]

With an appendix by P.-A. Meyer. [18]M. ´Emery,On two transfer principles in stochastic differential geometry, in S´ eminaire de Probabilit´ es XXIV 1988/89, Springer, 2006, pp. 407–441. [19]E. Ferrucci,A transfer principle for branched rough paths, Annales de l’Institut Henri Poincar´ e, Probabilit´ es et Statistiques, 61 (2025), pp. 1622 –

work page 2025