Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 3 minor 151 references

Digital Twin Networks for 6G Wireless Systems: Architecture, Enabling Technologies, Intelligent Control, and Open Challenges

T0 review · 2 major / 3 minor · reviewed 2026-08-16 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A survey of 6G digital twin networks argues the field splits into passive monitoring twins and active control twins.

desk verdict Useful survey with a real methodological mismatch: the complexity analysis that drives the latency and scalability ratings for active twins uses training-time Big-O, not per-decision inference costs. read the letter →

arxiv 2608.12267 v1 pith:EZO2EHKQ submitted 2026-08-12 eess.SY cs.SY

Charalampos Oikonomidis , Emmanouel T. Michailidis , Nikolaos I. Miridakis This is my paper · ORCID
classification eess.SYcs.SY
keywords DigitalTwinNetworks6Gwirelesspassivemonitoringtwinsactivecontrolcomputationalcomplexityraytracingreconfigurableintelligentsurfacesmobileedgecomputing
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This survey argues that digital twin networks for 6G need to be understood not as one concept but as two operationally different classes: passive monitoring twins that recreate the network and active control twins that actuate physical resources. It claims to be the first review to categorize state-of-the-art DTN architectures this way and to compare them by explicit Big-O computational complexity rather than by qualitative labels such as "computationally infeasible." The intended payoff is a practical feasibility lens: a network operator can decide whether a passive or active twin fits the use case and hardware budget before deployment, and researchers can see where scalability bottlenecks actually sit. The survey maps the ten analyzed architectures onto the passive/active classes, ties them to 6G use cases, and synthesizes open challenges in hardware saturation, actuation latency, and zero-trust security.

What carries the argument

The central object is the passive/active dichotomy itself, paired with a normalized complexity comparison framework. Passive twins represent the physical network without actuation; active twins include any control feedback loop, no matter how occasional. The framework grades each architecture on four dimensions: latency class (low, medium, or high), memory class (low, medium, or high), hardware dependence (general purpose, specialized, or highly specialized), and scalability trend (sub-linear, linear, or polynomial). These four dimensions do the load-bearing work: they allow Big-O expressions extracted from heterogeneous papers to be compared fairly, and they turn the survey's qualitative taxonomy into a decision tool for practitioners.

What would settle it

A systematic review covering more than ten DTN architectures that finds a published survey from before the paper's research window already providing the same passive/active categorization with explicit Big-O complexity comparisons and a normalized feasibility framework would falsify the novelty claim; alternatively, re-running the Table V comparison with a common baseline (same user count, same GPU, same scenario) and finding many passive twins with polynomial scaling or many active twins with linear scaling would undercut the scalability trends.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central discovery is a workable taxonomy plus a normalized comparison framework. DTNs divide into passive monitoring twins (offline or online) that generate high-fidelity simulation data but cannot affect the physical network, and active control twins that close the loop by adjusting reconfigurable intelligent surface phase shifts, task offloading, and resource allocation. The paper extracts explicit Big-O complexity expressions from ten recent architectures and argues that differences in these expressions are meaningful only when read alongside four normalized operational classes: latency class, memory class, hardware dependence, and scalability trend. Under that lens, the survey finds a systematic trade-off: passive twins are hardware-accessible but bounded by fidelity ceilings such as beam counts, tap counts, input resolution, and GPU memory, while active twins achieve control but inherit polynomial scaling from multi-agent or hybrid deep reinforcement learning architectures, with the notable contrast of a neuromorphic active twin showing sub-linear scaling at the cost of bespoke hardware. The conclusion is that current DTN feasibility is dominated by AI architecture choices and hardware ceilings, not by the DTN concept itself.

Load-bearing premise

The survey's comparative ratings and scalability conclusions assume the ten selected architectures represent the broader DTN literature; if they are atypical, the Table V generalizations may not hold.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • A practitioner can use the paper's three-step decision framework (actuation objective, hardware actuation support, and computational/latency budget) to choose between passive and active twin designs before building.
  • Passive twins remain viable in resource-constrained edge environments, while active twins require GPU-class edge infrastructure or specialized neuromorphic hardware.
  • Reconfigurable intelligent surface benefits saturate: adding reflecting elements beyond a threshold yields diminishing returns, and dynamic deployments such as UAV-mounted surfaces outperform static ones.
  • DTN optimization complexity is driven mainly by the underlying AI architecture choices, so model compression and efficient training should be research priorities.
  • Model bias between the physical network and the twin measurably degrades performance, making synchronization integrity a first-order design constraint.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same passive/active taxonomy could be applied to digital twins outside wireless, such as robotics or manufacturing, with the four normalized classes serving as a cross-domain audit checklist.
  • If the normalized framework were combined with agreed parameter definitions and a common baseline scenario, the survey's qualitative ratings could be upgraded into a quantitative benchmark that new DTN proposals report against.
  • The paper's emphasis on state desynchronization suggests a testable hypothesis: a DTN's control performance under delayed or perturbed telemetry should degrade in a measurable way, and that degradation curve could serve as a security metric.
  • Future work could test whether the linear scalability of the centralized multi-agent framework and the sub-linear neuromorphic scaling hold when both are run on identical hardware and the same parameter space.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 3 minor

Summary. This survey addresses Digital Twin Networks (DTNs) for 6G wireless systems. It proposes a taxonomy that classifies existing DTN architectures into passive monitoring twins and active control twins, reviews the enabling technologies (ray tracing, reconfigurable intelligent surfaces, artificial intelligence, and mobile edge computing), and analyzes ten specific architectures in depth. The paper's central contribution is a claimed technical and computational feasibility analysis: it extracts or derives explicit Big-O complexity expressions for the surveyed frameworks, introduces a normalized comparison framework across latency, memory, hardware dependence, and scalability, maps the architectures to 6G use cases, and discusses open challenges including GPU hardware limits, actuation latency, and zero-trust security. The authors are transparent about the survey's limitations, including the deliberate choice of ten architectures, the heterogeneity of the reviewed system models, and the fact that some complexity expressions are author-derived and explicitly marked.

Significance. If the analytical claims are made fully sound, this survey would fill a real gap: prior DTN surveys are largely qualitative, whereas this paper attempts to compare architectures through explicit mathematical complexity and a normalized feasibility framework. The passive/active dichotomy is a useful organizing principle, and the paper's transparency is a genuine strength: Section I.C explicitly acknowledges that direct numerical comparison across heterogeneous architectures is unfeasible, and Table IV marks author-derived expressions. The technology review and the mapping to use cases are also competently executed. However, the advertised contribution of assessing 'inference bottlenecks' is currently not fully supported for the active twins, because the Big-O expressions used for those architectures are training-time costs rather than per-decision inference costs. This is a load-bearing issue for the comparative conclusions in Table V, and it must be addressed before the survey's central analytical claim is fully credible.

major comments (2)
  1. [§IV.A, Table IV, Table V] The paper's central claim that it assesses 'hardware scalability and inference bottlenecks' is only partially supported for active twins, because the Big-O expressions in Table IV for Su et al., L. Li et al., Wu et al., and Ahmad et al. are training-time complexities. The factors Bmini, E, and tmax multiply the layer-product terms in each of these expressions; these factors are absent from a single per-decision inference pass, whose cost is approximately the forward pass through the actor/critic networks plus, for L. Li et al., one SQP solve per action. Table V then maps these training expressions to 'Low-Medium latency' and 'Polynomial scalability trend' entries. As written, the latency classifications therefore do not follow from the cited mathematics. I ask the authors to either derive and tabulate per-decision inference complexity for the active twins, or to revise Table V so that latency classes are explicitly based on reported experimental/simulation evidence and not on the training-time Big-O expressions.
  2. [§IV.B, Table V] For Ahmad et al., the O(E tmax N Bmini) expression is used to justify a 'Linear scalability trend', but this expression is again a training cost. The per-inference cost of the centralized MADDPG is O(N) in the number of agents times the actor/critic layer products, so the linear trend may survive, but the justification should be re-derived from inference cost. For Crysovergis et al., the text states explicitly that a formal complexity expression cannot be established and that the neuromorphic scaling cannot be compared with standard Big-O notation, yet Table V assigns a definite 'Sub-linear' scalability trend. If this entry is a qualitative architectural judgment, the table should say so; as it stands, the table overstates the formality of the comparison.
minor comments (3)
  1. [§III.B, final comparison paragraph] The sentence describing Gong et al. as 'achieving superior CSI deployment in resource-constrained environments' contradicts the same section's conclusion that their diffusion model requires abundant computational resources and Table V's High memory and High latency classification; this should be reworded, likely to 'resource-abundant environments'.
  2. [Table V] The grading definitions for latency and memory only define Low, Medium, and High, but the table uses composite entries such as 'Low-Medium' and 'Medium-High'; please either extend the definitions to cover the composite classes or restrict the entries to the defined levels.
  3. [Throughout] There are minor typographical and formatting issues: 'UA Vs' should be written as 'UAVs' or 'UAVs' without a space, 'L. Li. et al.' in Section IV.A contains an extra period, and the label 'Pre-print Inclusion:' in Section I.C is missing a space after the colon.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the survey's taxonomy, complexity annotations, and comparative ratings are derived from external literature or transparently marked author estimates, not from fitted inputs or self-citations.

full rationale

The paper is a survey, and its analytical chain is self-contained against external sources. The passive/active taxonomy is defined by an operational criterion (presence of a physical feedback loop), explicitly stated in Section II.C: 'the presence of any control functionality or physical feedback loop, regardless of its operational frequency or complexity, fundamentally elevates the system from a passive monitor to an active control twin.' This is a classification rule, not a prediction derived from itself. The claimed contribution of mathematical complexity evaluation is based on expressions taken from the surveyed papers or, for Su et al. and L. Li et al., author-derived estimates that are transparently marked with the ▲ symbol in Table IV and disclosed in Section I.C: 'some computational complexities that were omitted in their corresponding articles were estimated by the authors and are explicitly marked.' These estimates are extrapolations from described architectures, not fitted parameters, and they are not used to predict any measured outcome; Table V ratings are qualitative categorizations that the paper repeatedly cautions are not directly numerically comparable. The skeptical observation that training-time Big-O expressions are used to infer online inference bottlenecks is a possible correctness or relevance concern, not a circularity: an expression can be misapplied to a different question without being derived from the conclusion it supports. There is no load-bearing self-citation chain: the surveyed architectures come from external groups, the enabling-technology discussion cites independent tools and standards, and the security section explicitly labels its recommendations as 'informed author suggestions' rather than as results derived from the survey's own framework. No uniqueness theorem from the authors is invoked, and no renamed known result is presented as a derivation. The paper's limitations section strengthens, rather than undermines, the independence of its analysis.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The survey rests on domain assumptions about the value of ray-tracing, the sufficiency of the passive/active dichotomy, and the representativeness of the ten selected architectures. No free parameters are fitted to data, and no new entities are invented.

assumptions (3)
  • domain assumption Ray-tracing provides the high-fidelity site-specific channel modeling needed for digital twins, while stochastic channel models are inadequate.
    Invoked in Section II.A.1 as the reason DTNs should use deterministic ray tracing. This is a standard assumption in the cited literature, not proven within the survey.
  • ad hoc to paper The passive/active dichotomy is a meaningful and sufficient classification of DTN architectures for comparing computational overhead.
    Introduced in Section II.C as the paper's primary taxonomy. The authors acknowledge it is a high-level simplification and that hybrid systems with some control functionality are forced into the active category.
  • domain assumption The ten selected architectures are representative of the state-of-the-art DTN landscape.
    Stated in Section I.C as a depth-over-breadth choice. If the selection is biased, the scalability trends and lessons learned may not generalize to the broader literature.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Digital Twin Networks for 6G Wireless Systems: Architecture, Enabling Technologies, Intelligent Control, and Open Challenges." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/EZO2EHKQ

@misc{pith2026260812267,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Digital Twin Networks for 6G Wireless Systems: Architecture, Enabling Technologies, Intelligent Control, and Open Challenges},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/EZO2EHKQ}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2608.12267}
}
read the original abstract

The transition to the Sixth Generation (6G) of mobile networks requires proactive and deterministic orchestration to satisfy the stringent key performance indicators of future services, including ultra-reliable low-latency communications, enhanced mobile broadband, and massive machine-type communications. Digital Twin Networks (DTN) have recently emerged as a foundational technology to meet these demands, offering real-time and high-fidelity virtual replicas of the physical network. Although the current literature explores DTNs conceptually, a gap exists in the coverage of technical classification and computational feasibility evaluations. This survey addresses this gap by formally categorizing state-of-the-art DTN architectures into passive monitoring twins and active control twins. We provide an in-depth evaluation of their underlying enabling technologies, specifically ray-tracing, reconfigurable intelligent surfaces, artificial intelligence, and mobile edge computing. Importantly, this paper conducts a detailed mathematical and computational complexity analysis of state-of-the-art solutions to assess hardware scalability and inference bottlenecks. These architectures are then linked to various forthcoming 6G use cases, including smart cities, Industry 5.0, healthcare, and smart grids. Finally, we synthesize crucial unresolved challenges, highlighting graphics processing unit hardware limitations, cyber-physical actuation latency, and the need for a zero-trust security paradigm, offering strategic research directions to realize the unified internet of everything.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2608.12267 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. The Digital Twin Network Layered Architecture: a three-layer closed-loop framework illustrating the flow of real-time environmental data from the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Classification of DTN Frameworks Covered [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. The Passive Digital Twin Network Workflow [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (4 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: The Active Digital Twin Network Workflow [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Digital Twin-Assisted Task and Service Offloading [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: RIS-Assisted NLoS Mitigation RL executed on an energy-efficient neuromorphic processor, rather than using traditional GPU-based continuous NNs. Their framework employs two SNNs built from sparse leaky integrate-and-fire neurons with a decay factor of 0.9 that activate …
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Taxonomy of Digital Twin Network Use Cases [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p023_7.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

151 extracted references · 68 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Digital twin for metasurface reflector man- agement in 6G terahertz communications,

    M. Pengnoo, M. T. Barros, L. Wuttisittikulkij, B. Butler, A. Davy, and S. Balasubramaniam, “Digital twin for metasurface reflector man- agement in 6G terahertz communications,”IEEE Access, vol. 8, pp. 114 580–114 596, 2020

    2020

  2. [2]

    Rain attenuation characterization for 6G terahertz wire- less communication,

    M. E. Shawon, M. Z. Chowdhury, M. B. Hossen, M. F. Ahmed, and Y . M. Jang, “Rain attenuation characterization for 6G terahertz wire- less communication,” in2021 International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Information and Communication (ICAIIC), 2021, pp. 416–420

    2021

  3. [3]

    A survey on digital twin networks: Architecture, technologies, applications, and open issues,

    Y . Pan, L. Lei, G. Shen, X. Zhang, and P. Cao, “A survey on digital twin networks: Architecture, technologies, applications, and open issues,” IEEE Internet of Things Journal, vol. 12, no. 12, pp. 19 119–19 143, 2025

    2025

  4. [4]

    Digital twin in industries: A comprehensive survey,

    M. Bokhtiar Al Zami, S. Shaon, V . Khanh Quy, and D. C. Nguyen, “Digital twin in industries: A comprehensive survey,”IEEE Access, vol. 13, pp. 47 291–47 336, 2025

    2025

  5. [5]

    6G digital twin networks: From theory to practice,

    X. Lin, L. Kundu, C. Dick, E. Obiodu, T. Mostak, and M. Flaxman, “6G digital twin networks: From theory to practice,”IEEE Communications Magazine, vol. 61, no. 11, pp. 72–78, 2023

    2023

  6. [6]

    Effects of building materials and structures on radiowave prop- agation in the range of 1 MHz to 450 GHz,

    ITU-R, “Effects of building materials and structures on radiowave prop- agation in the range of 1 MHz to 450 GHz,” ITU-R, Recommendation P.2040, Sep 2025

    2025

  7. [7]

    Physics and AI-based digital twin of multi-spectrum propagation characteristics for communication and sensing in 6G and beyond,

    D. He, K. Guan, D. Yan, H. Yi, Z. Zhang, X. Wang, Z. Zhong, and N. Zorba, “Physics and AI-based digital twin of multi-spectrum propagation characteristics for communication and sensing in 6G and beyond,”IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, vol. 41, no. 11, pp. 3461–3473, 2023

    2023

  8. [8]

    Learnable wireless digital twins: Reconstructing electromagnetic field with neural representations,

    S. Jiang, Q. Qu, X. Pan, A. K. Agrawal, R. Newcombe, and A. Alkha- teeb, “Learnable wireless digital twins: Reconstructing electromagnetic field with neural representations,”IEEE Open Journal of the Commu- nications Society, vol. 6, pp. 1568–1590, 2025

    2025

Show all 151 references
  1. [9]

    From simulators to digital twins for enabling emerging cellular networks: A tutorial and survey,

    M. Manalastas, M. Umar Bin Farooq, S. Muhammad Asad Zaidi, H. Naeem Qureshi, Y . Sambo, and A. Imran, “From simulators to digital twins for enabling emerging cellular networks: A tutorial and survey,”IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 2693–2732, 2024

    2024

  2. [10]

    The role of digital twin in 6G-Based URLLCs: Current contributions, research challenges, and next direc- tions,

    A. Masaracchia, D. van Huynh, T. Q. Duong, O. A. Dobre, A. Nal- lanathan, and B. Canberk, “The role of digital twin in 6G-Based URLLCs: Current contributions, research challenges, and next direc- tions,”IEEE Open Journal of the Communications Society, vol. 6, pp. 1202–1215, 2025

    2025

  3. [11]

    Survey on digital twin edge networks (DITEN) toward 6G,

    F. Tang, X. Chen, T. K. Rodrigues, M. Zhao, and N. Kato, “Survey on digital twin edge networks (DITEN) toward 6G,”IEEE Open Journal of the Communications Society, vol. 3, pp. 1360–1381, 2022

    2022

  4. [12]

    A comprehensive survey on revolutionizing connectivity through artificial intelligence-enabled digital twin network in 6G,

    M. Sheraz, T. C. Chuah, Y . L. Lee, M. M. Alam, A. Al-Habashna, and Z. Han, “A comprehensive survey on revolutionizing connectivity through artificial intelligence-enabled digital twin network in 6G,” IEEE Access, vol. 12, pp. 49 184–49 215, 2024

    2024

  5. [13]

    Generative diffusion models for wireless networks: Fundamental, architecture, and state- of-the-art,

    D. Fan, R. Meng, X. Xu, Y . Liu, G. Nan, C. Feng, S. Han, S. Gao, B. Xu, D. Niyato, T. Q. S. Quek, and P. Zhang, “Generative diffusion models for wireless networks: Fundamental, architecture, and state- of-the-art,” 2025. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2507.16733

    2025

  6. [14]

    Advancing 6G: Survey for explainable ai on communications and network slicing,

    H. Sun, Y . Liu, A. Al-Tahmeesschi, A. Nag, M. Soleimanpour, B. Canberk, H. Arslan, and H. Ahmadi, “Advancing 6G: Survey for explainable ai on communications and network slicing,”IEEE Open Journal of the Communications Society, vol. 6, pp. 1372–1412, 2025

    2025

  7. [15]

    URLLC for 6G enabled industry 5.0: A taxonomy of architectures, cross layer techniques, and time critical applications,

    A. M. Ibrahim, R. Nordin, Y . S. M. Khamayseh, A. Amphawan, and M. B. Jasser, “URLLC for 6G enabled industry 5.0: A taxonomy of architectures, cross layer techniques, and time critical applications,”

  8. [16]

    Ray tracing for radio propagation model- ing: Principles and applications,

    Z. Yun and M. F. Iskander, “Ray tracing for radio propagation model- ing: Principles and applications,”IEEE Access, vol. 3, pp. 1089–1100, 2015

    2015

  9. [17]

    Digital twin channel for 6G: Concepts, architectures and potential applications,

    H. Wang, J. Zhang, G. Nie, L. Yu, Z. Yuan, T. Li, J. Wang, and G. Liu, “Digital twin channel for 6G: Concepts, architectures and potential applications,”IEEE Communications Magazine, vol. 63, no. 3, pp. 24– 30, 2025

    2025

  10. [18]

    Ultra broadband indoor channel measurements and calibrated ray tracing propagation modeling at THz frequencies,

    S. Priebe, M. Kannicht, M. Jacob, and T. K ¨urner, “Ultra broadband indoor channel measurements and calibrated ray tracing propagation modeling at THz frequencies,”Journal of Communications and Net- works, vol. 15, no. 6, pp. 547–558, 2013

    2013

  11. [19]

    A ray tracing parameter optimization system in mobile radio propagation prediction,

    M. Hirose, T. Imai, S. Wu, S. Iwasaki, G. S. Ching, and Y . Kishiki, “A ray tracing parameter optimization system in mobile radio propagation prediction,” in2022 International Workshop on Antenna Technology (iWAT), 2022, pp. 269–270

    2022

  12. [20]

    A fast ray tracing algorithm for urban areas,

    K. Long, W. Wang, Y . Wu, and Y . Liu, “A fast ray tracing algorithm for urban areas,” in2022 IEEE 10th Asia-Pacific Conference on Antennas and Propagation (APCAP), 2022, pp. 1–2

    2022

  13. [21]

    An E2E simulator for 5G NR networks,

    N. Patriciello, S. Lagen, B. Bojovic, and L. Giupponi, “An E2E simulator for 5G NR networks,” 2019. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/1911.05534

    2019 arXiv

  14. [22]

    Simu5g: A system-level simulator for 5g networks,

    G. Nardini, G. Stea, A. Virdis, and D. Sabella, “Simu5g: A system-level simulator for 5g networks,” inProceedings of the 10th International Conference on Simulation and Modeling Methodologies, Technologies and Applications - SIMULTECH, INSTICC. SciTePress, 2020, pp. 68–80

    2020

  15. [23]

    Sionna RT: Differentiable ray tracing for radio propagation modeling,

    J. Hoydis, F. A. Aoudia, S. Cammerer, M. Nimier-David, N. Binder, G. Marcus, and A. Keller, “Sionna RT: Differentiable ray tracing for radio propagation modeling,” 2023. [Online]. Available: https: //arxiv.org/abs/2303.11103

    2023 arXiv

  16. [24]

    Flexible multi-node simulation of cellular mobile communications: the Vienna 5G System Level Simulator,

    M. K. M ¨uller, F. Ademaj, T. Dittrich, A. Fastenbauer, B. R. Elbal, A. Nabavi, L. Nagel, S. Schwarz, and M. Rupp, “Flexible multi-node simulation of cellular mobile communications: the Vienna 5G System Level Simulator,”EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking...

    2018

  17. [25]

    Project PLATEAU,

    Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism, “Project PLATEAU,” https://www.mlit.go.jp/plateau/, accessed: Feb. 19, 2026

    2026

  18. [26]

    OpenStreetMap,

    OpenStreetMap Contributors, “OpenStreetMap,” https://planet. openstreetmap.org/, accessed: Feb. 19, 2026

    2026

  19. [27]

    Digital twin-assisted explainable AI for robust beam prediction in mmWave MIMO systems,

    N. Khan, A. Abdallah, A. Celik, A. M. Eltawil, and S. Coleri, “Digital twin-assisted explainable AI for robust beam prediction in mmWave MIMO systems,”IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, pp. 1–1, 2025. PREPARATION OF PAPERS FOR IEEE OPEN JOURNALS 34

    2025

  20. [28]

    Digital twin of channel: Diffusion model for sensing-assisted statistical channel state information generation,

    X. Gong, X. Liu, A.-A. Lu, X. Gao, X.-G. Xia, C.-X. Wang, and X. You, “Digital twin of channel: Diffusion model for sensing-assisted statistical channel state information generation,”IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, vol. 24, no. 5, pp. 3805–3821, 2025

    2025

  21. [29]

    Wireless EM propagation software,

    Remcom, “Wireless EM propagation software,” https://www.remcom. com/wireless-insite-propagation-software, accessed: Mar. 23, 2026

    2026

  22. [30]

    DeepMIMO: A generic deep learning dataset for millimeter wave and massive MIMO applications,

    A. Alkhateeb, “DeepMIMO: A generic deep learning dataset for millimeter wave and massive MIMO applications,” 2019. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/1902.06435

    2019 arXiv

  23. [31]

    A predictive 6G network with environment sens- ing enhancement: From radio wave propagation perspective,

    G. Nie, J. Zhang, Y . Zhang, L. Yu, Z. Zhang, Y . Sun, L. Tian, Q. Wang, and L. Xia, “A predictive 6G network with environment sens- ing enhancement: From radio wave propagation perspective,”China Communications, vol. 19, no. 6, pp. 105–122, 2022

    2022

  24. [32]

    Open wireless digital twin: End-to-end 5G mobility emulation with OpenAirInterface and Ray Tracing,

    T. Iye, M. Sakamoto, S. Takaya, E. Sato, Y . Susukida, Y . Nagaoka, K. Maruta, and J. Nakazato, “Open wireless digital twin: End-to-end 5G mobility emulation with OpenAirInterface and Ray Tracing,”IEEE Access, vol. 13, pp. 175 109–175 122, 2025

    2025

  25. [33]

    Digital-twin-enabled city-model-aware deep learning for dynamic channel estimation in urban vehicular environ- ments,

    C. Ding and I. W.-H. Ho, “Digital-twin-enabled city-model-aware deep learning for dynamic channel estimation in urban vehicular environ- ments,”IEEE Transactions on Green Communications and Networking, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 1604–1612, 2022

    2022

  26. [34]

    Mi- croscopic traffic simulation using SUMO,

    P. A. Lopez, M. Behrisch, L. Bieker-Walz, J. Erdmann, Y .-P. Fl ¨otter¨od, R. Hilbrich, L. L ¨ucken, J. Rummel, P. Wagner, and E. Wiessner, “Mi- croscopic traffic simulation using SUMO,” in2018 21st International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC), 2018, p...

    2018

  27. [35]

    Exploiting age of information in network digital twins for AI- driven real-time link blockage detection,

    M. Zhu, F. Linsalata, S. Mura, L. Cazzella, D. Badini, and U. Spag- nolini, “Exploiting age of information in network digital twins for AI- driven real-time link blockage detection,”Computer Networks, vol. 274, p. 111855, 2026

    2026

  28. [36]

    CARLA: An open urban driving simulator,

    A. Dosovitskiy, G. Ros, F. Codevilla, A. Lopez, and V . Koltun, “CARLA: An open urban driving simulator,” inProceedings of the 1st Annual Conference on Robot Learning, 2017, pp. 1–16

    2017

  29. [37]

    Digital twins driven intelligent reflecting surfaces for 6G enabled intelligent transportation systems,

    S. Ahmad, S. M. Alghamdi, M. Ahmad Jan, and M. Tariq, “Digital twins driven intelligent reflecting surfaces for 6G enabled intelligent transportation systems,”IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transporta- tion Systems, vol. 26, no. 11, pp. 20 264–20 273, 2025

    2025

  30. [38]

    A digital twin based reconfigurable intelligent surface phase adaptation using spiking reinforcement learn- ing policy optimization,

    I. Crysovergis, S. E. Trevlakis, D. Kleitsas, A.-A. A. Boulogeorgos, T. A. Tsiftsis, and D. Niyato, “A digital twin based reconfigurable intelligent surface phase adaptation using spiking reinforcement learn- ing policy optimization,” in2025 IEEE International Conference on Ma...

    2025

  31. [39]

    Effects of building materials and structures on radiowave prop- agation in the range of 1 MHz to 450 GHz,

    ITU-R, “Effects of building materials and structures on radiowave prop- agation in the range of 1 MHz to 450 GHz,” ITU-R, Recommendation P.2040, Aug 2023

    2023

  32. [40]

    Real-time digital twins: Vision and research directions for 6G and beyond,

    A. Alkhateeb, S. Jiang, and G. Charan, “Real-time digital twins: Vision and research directions for 6G and beyond,”IEEE Communications Magazine, vol. 61, no. 11, pp. 128–134, 2023

    2023

  33. [41]

    Leveraging ray tracing cores for particle- based simulations on GPUs,

    S. Zhao, Z. Lai, and J. Zhao, “Leveraging ray tracing cores for particle- based simulations on GPUs,”International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, vol. 124, no. 3, pp. 696–713, 2023

    2023

  34. [42]

    NVIDIA Omniverse,

    NVIDIA Corporation, “NVIDIA Omniverse,” https://www.nvidia.com/ en-us/omniverse/, accessed: Mar. 23, 2026

    2026

  35. [43]

    Blender 3D design software,

    The Blender Foundation, “Blender 3D design software,” https://www. blender.org/, accessed: Feb. 19, 2026

    2026

  36. [44]

    Electromagnetic metasurfaces: Insight into evolution, design and applications,

    K. Singh, F. Ahmed, and K. Esselle, “Electromagnetic metasurfaces: Insight into evolution, design and applications,”Crystals, vol. 12, no. 12, 2022

    2022

  37. [45]

    A digital twin for reconfigurable intelligent surface assisted wireless communication,

    B. Sheen, J. Yang, X. Feng, and M. M. U. Chowdhury, “A digital twin for reconfigurable intelligent surface assisted wireless communication,”

  38. [46]

    Digital twin enabled 6G cell-free multi-function reconfig- urable metasurfaces communications: Concepts, challenges, and future directions,

    T. Zhang, D. Xu, O. Alfarraj, H. Feng, A. Al-Dulaimi, K. Yu, and S. Mumtaz, “Digital twin enabled 6G cell-free multi-function reconfig- urable metasurfaces communications: Concepts, challenges, and future directions,”IEEE Network, vol. 39, no. 5, pp. 145–154, 2025

    2025

  39. [47]

    Digital twin aided RIS communication: Robust beamforming and interference management,

    S. Alikhani and A. Alkhateeb, “Digital twin aided RIS communication: Robust beamforming and interference management,” in2024 IEEE 100th Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC2024-Fall), 2024, pp. 1– 6

    2024

  40. [48]

    Aerial reconfigurable intelligent surface-aided MEC networks with ultra-reliable low-latency commu- nications: A digital twin approach,

    W. Su, F. Tan, S. Li, and H. Chen, “Aerial reconfigurable intelligent surface-aided MEC networks with ultra-reliable low-latency commu- nications: A digital twin approach,” in2025 IEEE/CIC International Conference on Communications in China (ICCC Workshops), 2025, pp. 1–6

    2025

  41. [49]

    Dynamic resource alloca- tion in iot enhanced by digital twins and intelligent reflecting surfaces,

    M. Tariq, S. Ahmad, and H. Vincent Poor, “Dynamic resource alloca- tion in iot enhanced by digital twins and intelligent reflecting surfaces,” IEEE Internet of Things Journal, vol. 11, no. 16, pp. 27 295–27 302, 2024

    2024

  42. [50]

    Digital twin-aided learning for managing reconfigurable intelligent surface-assisted, uplink, user- centric cell-free systems,

    Y . Cui, T. Lv, W. Ni, and A. Jamalipour, “Digital twin-aided learning for managing reconfigurable intelligent surface-assisted, uplink, user- centric cell-free systems,”IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Commu- nications, vol. 41, no. 10, pp. 3175–3190, 2023

    2023

  43. [51]

    Intelligent reflecting surface and network slicing assisted vehicle digital twin update,

    L. Li, L. Tang, Y . Wang, T. Liu, and Q. Chen, “Intelligent reflecting surface and network slicing assisted vehicle digital twin update,”IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 3799–3813, 2025

    2025

  44. [52]

    Intelligent reflecting surfaces aided task offloading in digital twin edge networks,

    Y . Dai, J. Wu, J. Zhao, B. Gong, and Y . Lu, “Intelligent reflecting surfaces aided task offloading in digital twin edge networks,” in2023 IEEE 98th Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC2023-Fall), 2023, pp. 1–5

    2023

  45. [53]

    Integrated resource collaboration for RIS-assisted digital- twin-empowered internet of everything,

    M. Wu, Y . Gao, Q. Song, K. Li, W. Lu, L. Guo, and A. Ja- malipour, “Integrated resource collaboration for RIS-assisted digital- twin-empowered internet of everything,”IEEE Internet of Things Journal, vol. 12, no. 13, pp. 23 275–23 287, 2025

    2025

  46. [54]

    Generative ar- tificial intelligence: a systematic review and applications,

    S. S. Sengar, A. B. Hasan, S. Kumar, and F. Carroll, “Generative ar- tificial intelligence: a systematic review and applications,”Multimedia Tools and Applications, vol. 84, no. 21, p. 23661–23700, Aug. 2024

    2024

  47. [55]

    Artificial intelligence in mobile communication: A survey,

    Y . Mao, A. Pranolo, L. Hernandez, A. P. Wibawa, and Z. Nuryana, “Artificial intelligence in mobile communication: A survey,”IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, vol. 1212, no. 1, p. 012046, jan 2022

    2022

  48. [56]

    A digital twin approach for self-optimization of mobile networks,

    J. Deng, Q. Zheng, G. Liu, J. Bai, K. Tian, C. Sun, Y . Yan, and Y . Liu, “A digital twin approach for self-optimization of mobile networks,” in2021 IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference Workshops (WCNCW), 2021, pp. 1–6

    2021

  49. [57]

    Digital twin-enhanced deep reinforcement learning for resource management in networks slicing,

    Z. Zhang, Y . Huang, C. Zhang, Q. Zheng, L. Yang, and X. You, “Digital twin-enhanced deep reinforcement learning for resource management in networks slicing,”IEEE Transactions on Communications, vol. 72, no. 10, pp. 6209–6224, 2024

    2024

  50. [58]

    Deep energy-efficient optimization network for URLLC over cell-free massive MIMO,

    D. Li, J. Li, D. Niyato, W. Feng, and W. Jiang, “Deep energy-efficient optimization network for URLLC over cell-free massive MIMO,”IEEE Internet of Things Journal, vol. 12, no. 12, pp. 20 973–20 987, 2025

    2025

  51. [59]

    A secure and resilient 6G architecture vision of the german flagship project 6G- ANNA,

    M. Hoffmann, G. Kunzmann, T. Dudda, R. Irmer, A. Jukan, G. Macher, A. Ahmad, F. R. Beenen, A. Br ¨oring, F. Fellhauer, G. P. Fettweis, F. H. P. Fitzek, N. Franchi, F. Gast, B. Haberland, S. Hoppe, S. Joodaki, N. P. Kuruvatti, C. Li, M. Lopez, F. Mehmeti, T. Meyerhoff, L. Miret...

    2023

  52. [60]

    Digital twin enhanced federated reinforcement learning with lightweight knowledge distillation in mo- bile networks,

    X. Zhou, X. Zheng, X. Cui, J. Shi, W. Liang, Z. Yan, L. T. Yang, S. Shimizu, and K. I.-K. Wang, “Digital twin enhanced federated reinforcement learning with lightweight knowledge distillation in mo- bile networks,”IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, vol. 41, no. ...

    2023

  53. [61]

    Digital twin vir- tualization with machine learning for IoT and beyond 5G networks: Research directions for security and optimal control,

    J. Jagannath, K. Ramezanpour, and A. Jagannath, “Digital twin vir- tualization with machine learning for IoT and beyond 5G networks: Research directions for security and optimal control,” 2022

    2022

  54. [62]

    Empowering things with intelligence: A survey of the progress, challenges, and opportunities in artificial intelligence of things,

    J. Zhang and D. Tao, “Empowering things with intelligence: A survey of the progress, challenges, and opportunities in artificial intelligence of things,”IEEE Internet of Things Journal, vol. 8, no. 10, pp. 7789– 7817, 2021

    2021

  55. [63]

    Personalized federated learning for generative ai empowered digital twin networks,

    D. Jin, Y . Xiao, Y . Li, and G. Shi, “Personalized federated learning for generative ai empowered digital twin networks,”IEEE Transactions on Network Science and Engineering, vol. 13, pp. 6174–6192, 2026

    2026

  56. [64]

    Federated learning-driven digital twin framework for adaptive resource management in 6G edge networks,

    M. Rahmati and N. Rahmati, “Federated learning-driven digital twin framework for adaptive resource management in 6G edge networks,” J. Electr. Syst. Inf. Technol., vol. 13, no. 1, Jan. 2026

    2026

  57. [65]

    Federated learning for dynamic resource allocation in 6G network slicing,

    R. Krishnamoorthy, C. N. Gireesh Babu, P. Gite, A. O. Khadidos, A. O. Khadidos, O. M. Mirza, and S. Selvarajan, “Federated learning for dynamic resource allocation in 6G network slicing,”Wirel. Pers. Commun., Mar. 2026

    2026

  58. [66]

    Low-latency federated learning and blockchain for edge association in digital twin empowered 6g networks,

    Y . Lu, X. Huang, K. Zhang, S. Maharjan, and Y . Zhang, “Low-latency federated learning and blockchain for edge association in digital twin empowered 6g networks,”IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, vol. 17, no. 7, pp. 5098–5107, 2021

    2021

  59. [67]

    Next-gen internet of drones: Federated learning and digital twin synergy for energy-efficient task allocation and seamless service migration,

    A. Arsalan, T. Umer, R. Asif Rehman, and B.-S. Kim, “Next-gen internet of drones: Federated learning and digital twin synergy for energy-efficient task allocation and seamless service migration,”IEEE Access, vol. 13, pp. 64 459–64 472, 2025

    2025

  60. [68]

    Mobile edge computing: A survey on archi- tecture and computation offloading,

    P. Mach and Z. Becvar, “Mobile edge computing: A survey on archi- tecture and computation offloading,”IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 1628–1656, 2017. PREPARATION OF PAPERS FOR IEEE OPEN JOURNALS 35

    2017

  61. [69]

    URLLC edge networks with joint optimal user association, task offloading and resource allocation: A digital twin approach,

    D. Van Huynh, V .-D. Nguyen, S. R. Khosravirad, V . Sharma, O. A. Dobre, H. Shin, and T. Q. Duong, “URLLC edge networks with joint optimal user association, task offloading and resource allocation: A digital twin approach,”IEEE Transactions on Communications, vol. 70, no. 11, ...

    2022

  62. [70]

    Digital twin-assisted URLLC-enabled task offloading in mobile edge network via robust combinatorial optimization,

    Y . Hao, J. Wang, D. Huo, N. Guizani, L. Hu, and M. Chen, “Digital twin-assisted URLLC-enabled task offloading in mobile edge network via robust combinatorial optimization,”IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, vol. 41, no. 10, pp. 3022–3033, 2023

    2023

  63. [71]

    Task dependency aware optimal resource allocation for urllc edge network: A digital twin approach using finite blocklength,

    M. Awais, H. Pervaiz, Q. Ni, and W. Yu, “Task dependency aware optimal resource allocation for urllc edge network: A digital twin approach using finite blocklength,”IEEE Transactions on Green Com- munications and Networking, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 177–190, 2025

    2025

  64. [72]

    Digital-twin-assisted task offloading based on edge collaboration in the digital twin edge network,

    T. Liu, L. Tang, W. Wang, Q. Chen, and X. Zeng, “Digital-twin-assisted task offloading based on edge collaboration in the digital twin edge network,”IEEE Internet of Things Journal, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 1427– 1444, 2022

    2022

  65. [73]

    Digital twin-enabled 6G aerial edge computing with ultra-reliable and low-latency communications : (invited paper),

    T. Q. Duong, D. Van Huynh, Y . Li, E. Garcia-Palacios, and K. Sun, “Digital twin-enabled 6G aerial edge computing with ultra-reliable and low-latency communications : (invited paper),” in2022 1st Interna- tional Conference on 6G Networking (6GNet), 2022, pp. 1–5

    2022

  66. [74]

    OpenAirInterface: Democratizing innovation in the 5G era,

    C. Bonnetet al., “OpenAirInterface: Democratizing innovation in the 5G era,”Computer Networks, vol. 176, p. 107297, 2020

    2020

  67. [75]

    C-GRBFnet: A physics-inspired generative deep neural network for channel representation and prediction,

    Z. Xiao, Z. Zhang, C. Huang, X. Chen, C. Zhong, and M. Debbah, “C-GRBFnet: A physics-inspired generative deep neural network for channel representation and prediction,”IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, vol. 40, no. 8, pp. 2282–2299, 2022

    2022

  68. [76]

    Sionna RT: Technical report,

    F. A. Aoudia, J. Hoydis, M. Nimier-David, B. Nicolet, S. Cammerer, and A. Keller, “Sionna RT: Technical report,” 2025. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2504.21719

    2025

  69. [77]

    Study on channel model for frequencies from 0.5 to 100 GHz (3GPP TR 38.901 version 16.1.0 release 16),

    ETSI, “Study on channel model for frequencies from 0.5 to 100 GHz (3GPP TR 38.901 version 16.1.0 release 16),” ETSI, Technical Report TR 138 901, Jul 2020

    2020

  70. [78]

    Deep residual learning for image recognition,

    K. He, X. Zhang, S. Ren, and J. Sun, “Deep residual learning for image recognition,” in2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 2016, pp. 770–778

    2016

  71. [79]

    Denoising diffusion probabilistic models,

    J. Ho, A. Jain, and P. Abbeel, “Denoising diffusion probabilistic models,” inAdvances in Neural Information Processing Systems, H. Larochelle, M. Ranzato, R. Hadsell, M. Balcan, and H. Lin, Eds., vol. 33. Curran Associates, Inc., 2020, pp. 6840–6851

    2020

  72. [80]

    Conditional generative adversarial nets,

    M. Mirza and S. Osindero, “Conditional generative adversarial nets,”

  73. [81]

    Wasserstein generative adversarial networks,

    M. Arjovsky, S. Chintala, and L. Bottou, “Wasserstein generative adversarial networks,” inProceedings of the 34th International Conference on Machine Learning, ser. Proceedings of Machine Learning Research, D. Precup and Y . W. Teh, Eds., vol. 70. PMLR, 06–11 Aug 2017, pp. 214...

    2017

  74. [82]

    Smart cities—a structured literature review,

    J. S. Gracias, G. S. Parnell, E. Specking, E. A. Pohl, and R. Buchanan, “Smart cities—a structured literature review,”Smart Cities, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 1719–1743, 2023

    2023

  75. [83]

    A digital twin framework for edge server placement in mobile edge computing,

    E. Bozkaya, “A digital twin framework for edge server placement in mobile edge computing,” in2023 4th International Informatics and Software Engineering Conference (IISEC), 2023, pp. 1–6

    2023

  76. [84]

    On the integration of digital twin networks into city digital twins: Benefits and challenges,

    I. Turcanu, G. Castignani, and S. Faye, “On the integration of digital twin networks into city digital twins: Benefits and challenges,” in 2024 IEEE 21st Consumer Communications & Networking Conference (CCNC), 2024, pp. 752–758

    2024

  77. [85]

    Urban digital twins for smart cities and citizens: The case study of Herrenberg, Germany,

    F. Dembski, U. W ¨ossner, M. Letzgus, M. Ruddat, and C. Yamu, “Urban digital twins for smart cities and citizens: The case study of Herrenberg, Germany,”Sustainability, vol. 12, no. 6, 2020

    2020

  78. [86]

    Digital twin framework for smart city solutions,

    L. Adreani, P. Bellini, C. Colombo, M. Fanfani, P. Nesi, G. Pantaleo, and R. Pisanu, “Digital twin framework for smart city solutions,” in The 28th International Conference on Distributed Multimedia Systems, 06 2022, pp. 1–8

    2022

  79. [87]

    The potential of augmented reality for digital twins: A literature review,

    A. K ¨unz, S. Rosmann, E. Loria, and J. Pirker, “The potential of augmented reality for digital twins: A literature review,” in2022 IEEE Conference on Virtual Reality and 3D User Interfaces (VR), 2022, pp. 389–398

    2022

  80. [88]

    Study on poisoning attacks: Appli- cation through an IoT temperature dataset,

    F. K. Vuseghesa and M.-L. Messai, “Study on poisoning attacks: Appli- cation through an IoT temperature dataset,” in2023 IEEE International Conference on Enabling Technologies: Infrastructure for Collaborative Enterprises (WETICE), 2023, pp. 1–6

    2023

  81. [89]

    Decentralized digital twin networks,

    Y . Cao, J. Cao, B. Du, and R. Li, “Decentralized digital twin networks,” IEEE Communications Magazine, pp. 1–7, 2025

    2025

  82. [90]

    Digital twin driven blockchain based reliable and efficient 6G edge network,

    M. O. Ozdogan, L. Carkacioglu, and B. Canberk, “Digital twin driven blockchain based reliable and efficient 6G edge network,” in2022 18th International Conference on Distributed Computing in Sensor Systems (DCOSS), 2022, pp. 342–348

    2022

  83. [91]

    Forging the industrial metaverse for industry 5.0: Where extended reality, IIoT, opportunistic edge computing, and digital twins meet,

    T. M. Fern ´andez-Caram´es and P. Fraga-Lamas, “Forging the industrial metaverse for industry 5.0: Where extended reality, IIoT, opportunistic edge computing, and digital twins meet,”IEEE Access, vol. 12, pp. 95 778–95 819, 2024

    2024

  84. [92]

    Resource allocation for eMBB/URLLC coexistence in massive MIMO industrial automa- tion,

    J. Fang, P. Zhu, B. Ai, F.-C. Zheng, and X. You, “Resource allocation for eMBB/URLLC coexistence in massive MIMO industrial automa- tion,”IEEE Internet of Things Journal, vol. 12, no. 10, pp. 14 282– 14 296, 2025

    2025

  85. [93]

    Dynamic re- source allocation for URLLC and eMBB in MEC-NFV 5G networks,

    C. Souza, M. Falc ˜ao, A. Balieiro, E. Alves, and T. Taleb, “Dynamic re- source allocation for URLLC and eMBB in MEC-NFV 5G networks,” Computer Networks, vol. 260, p. 111127, 2025

    2025

  86. [94]

    ORBIT-DT: Bridging simulation and reality with digital twin design for O-RAN in beyond 5G networks,

    M. Yaqoob, R. Trestian, and H. X. Nguyen, “ORBIT-DT: Bridging simulation and reality with digital twin design for O-RAN in beyond 5G networks,” in2025 IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference (WCNC), 2025, pp. 1–6

    2025

  87. [95]

    A novel wireless resource management for the 6G-enabled high-density internet of things,

    X. Shen, W. Liao, and Q. Yin, “A novel wireless resource management for the 6G-enabled high-density internet of things,”IEEE Wireless Communications, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 32–39, 2022

    2022

  88. [96]

    Digital twin to control and monitor an industrial cyber-physical environment supported by augmented reality,

    G. Caiza and R. Sanz, “Digital twin to control and monitor an industrial cyber-physical environment supported by augmented reality,”Applied Sciences, vol. 13, no. 13, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/13/13/7503

    2023

  89. [97]

    Challenges and opportunities in secure real-time digital twin systems for AR/VR-enabled smart factories,

    Z. Min, R. Shetty, S. Shekhar, A. D. Chhokra, M. Kritzler, T. Cui, A. Gupta, T. Ahlgrim, J. H. Reed, and A. Gokhale, “Challenges and opportunities in secure real-time digital twin systems for AR/VR-enabled smart factories,” inProceedings of the International Workshop on Middle...

    2025

  90. [98]

    Resource- constrained extended reality operated with digital twin in industrial internet of things,

    H. M. Kamdjou, D. Baudry, V . Havard, and S. Ouchani, “Resource- constrained extended reality operated with digital twin in industrial internet of things,”IEEE Open Journal of the Communications Society, vol. 5, pp. 928–950, 2024

    2024

  91. [99]

    A revolution of personalized healthcare: Enabling human digital twin with mobile AIGC,

    J. Chen, C. Yi, H. Du, D. Niyato, J. Kang, J. Cai, and X. Shen, “A revolution of personalized healthcare: Enabling human digital twin with mobile AIGC,”IEEE Network, vol. 38, no. 6, pp. 234–242, 2024

    2024

  92. [100]

    Human digital twin: a survey,

    Y . Lin, L. Chen, A. Ali, C. Nugent, I. Cleland, R. Li, J. Ding, and H. Ning, “Human digital twin: a survey,”J. Cloud Comput. Adv. Syst. Appl., vol. 13, no. 1, Aug. 2024

    2024

  93. [101]

    Networking architecture and key supporting technologies for human digital twin in personalized healthcare: A comprehensive survey,

    J. Chen, C. Yi, S. D. Okegbile, J. Cai, and X. Shen, “Networking architecture and key supporting technologies for human digital twin in personalized healthcare: A comprehensive survey,”IEEE Communica- tions Surveys & Tutorials, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 706–746, 2024

    2024

  94. [102]

    Enabling tactile internet via 6G: Application characteristics, requirements, and design considerations,

    B. S. Chaudhari, “Enabling tactile internet via 6G: Application characteristics, requirements, and design considerations,”Future Internet, vol. 17, no. 3, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://www.mdpi. com/1999-5903/17/3/122

    2025

  95. [103]

    Blockchain and AI for collaborative intrusion detection in 6G-enabled IoT networks,

    M. Chelghoum, G. Bendiab, M. A. Labiod, M. Benmohammed, S. Shiaeles, and A. Mellouk, “Blockchain and AI for collaborative intrusion detection in 6G-enabled IoT networks,” in2024 IEEE 25th International Conference on High Performance Switching and Routing (HPSR), 2024, pp. 179–184

    2024

  96. [104]

    Digital- twin-6G empowered future smart grid applications,

    A. Kharbouch, F. H. Aghdam, N. Gholipoor, and M. Rasti, “Digital- twin-6G empowered future smart grid applications,”IEEE Wireless Communications, vol. 32, no. 3, pp. 90–97, 2025

    2025

  97. [105]

    A. Q. Al-Shetwi, I. E. Atawi, M. A. El-Hameed, and A. Abuelrub, “Digital twin technology for renewable energy, smart grids, energy stor- age and vehicle-to-grid integration: Advancements, applications, key players, challenges and future perspectives in modernising sustainable ...

    2025

  98. [106]

    Digital twinning in smart grid networks: Interplay, resource allocation and use cases,

    A. Othman, G. Kaddoum, J. V . C. Evangelista, M. Au, and B. L. Agba, “Digital twinning in smart grid networks: Interplay, resource allocation and use cases,”IEEE Communications Magazine, vol. 61, no. 11, pp. 120–126, 2023

    2023

  99. [107]

    Secure UA V-aided mobile edge computing for IoT: A review,

    E. T. Michailidis, K. , D. N. Skoutas, D. V ouyioukas, and C. Skianis, “Secure UA V-aided mobile edge computing for IoT: A review,”IEEE Access, vol. 10, pp. 86 353–86 383, 2022

    2022

  100. [108]

    A digital twin network for proactive security: The smart grid use-case,

    B. Boi and C. Esposito, “A digital twin network for proactive security: The smart grid use-case,” in2025 55th Annual IEEE/IFIP International Conference on Dependable Systems and Networks Workshops (DSN- W), 2025, pp. 152–159

    2025

  101. [109]

    Digital twins for the future power system: An overview and a future PREPARATION OF PAPERS FOR IEEE OPEN JOURNALS 36 perspective,

    Z. Song, C. M. Hackl, A. Anand, A. Thommessen, J. Petzschmann, O. Kamel, R. Braunbehrens, A. Kaifel, C. Roos, and S. Hauptmann, “Digital twins for the future power system: An overview and a future PREPARATION OF PAPERS FOR IEEE OPEN JOURNALS 36 perspective,”Sustainability, vol...

    2023

  102. [110]

    Digital twins and smart grid infrastructure: Improving reliability and efficiency through virtual models,

    H. Shahinzadeh, M. M. Hayati, M. Abapour, G. B. Gharehpetian, A. Y . Abdelaziz, and F. Jurado, “Digital twins and smart grid infrastructure: Improving reliability and efficiency through virtual models,” in2024 14th Smart Grid Conference (SGC), 2024, pp. 1–8

    2024

  103. [111]

    Internet of Everything (IoE) taxonomies: A survey and a novel knowledge-based taxonomy,

    V . C. Farias da Costa, L. Oliveira, and J. de Souza, “Internet of Everything (IoE) taxonomies: A survey and a novel knowledge-based taxonomy,”Sensors, vol. 21, no. 2, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/21/2/568

    2021

  104. [112]

    Active reconfigurable intelligent surface-aided wireless communications,

    R. Long, Y .-C. Liang, Y . Pei, and E. G. Larsson, “Active reconfigurable intelligent surface-aided wireless communications,”IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, vol. 20, no. 8, pp. 4962–4975, 2021

    2021

  105. [113]

    Digital twin and transformer-based learning for secure and energy- efficient active RIS-assisted communications,

    A. Y . Sarhan, O. A. Abdullah, K. T. Mursi, and H. Al-Hraishawi, “Digital twin and transformer-based learning for secure and energy- efficient active RIS-assisted communications,”IEEE Access, vol. 14, pp. 8060–8077, 2026

    2026

  106. [114]

    Ex- ploring the 6G potentials: Immersive, hyperreliable, and low-latency communication,

    A. A. Shamsabadi, A. Yadav, Y . Gadallah, and H. Yanikomeroglu, “Ex- ploring the 6G potentials: Immersive, hyperreliable, and low-latency communication,”IEEE Vehicular Technology Magazine, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 74–82, 2025

    2025

  107. [115]

    Integrated sensing and communication for 6G holographic digital twins,

    H. Zhang, Z. Zhang, X. Liu, W. Li, H. Li, and C. Sun, “Integrated sensing and communication for 6G holographic digital twins,”IEEE Wireless Communications, vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 104–112, 2025

    2025

  108. [116]

    Research on integrated sensing, communication resource allocation, and digital twin placement based on digital twin in IoV,

    L. Tang, A. Wang, B. Xia, Y . Tang, and Q. Chen, “Research on integrated sensing, communication resource allocation, and digital twin placement based on digital twin in IoV,”IEEE Internet of Things Journal, vol. 12, no. 11, pp. 17 300–17 315, 2025

    2025

  109. [117]

    Unicron: Economizing self-healing LLM training at scale,

    T. He, X. Li, Z. Wang, K. Qian, J. Xu, W. Yu, and J. Zhou, “Unicron: Economizing self-healing LLM training at scale,” 2023. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2401.00134

    2023 arXiv

  110. [118]

    Benchmarking the performance and energy efficiency of AI accelera- tors for AI training,

    Y . Wang, Q. Wang, S. Shi, X. He, Z. Tang, K. Zhao, and X. Chu, “Benchmarking the performance and energy efficiency of AI accelera- tors for AI training,” in2020 20th IEEE/ACM International Symposium on Cluster, Cloud and Internet Computing (CCGRID), 2020, pp. 744– 751

    2020

  111. [119]

    Reducing hardware-related interruptions in AI clusters: Strategies for resilient GPU infrastructure,

    S. Gupta, “Reducing hardware-related interruptions in AI clusters: Strategies for resilient GPU infrastructure,”J. Int. Crisis Risk Commun. Res., pp. 44–53, Oct. 2025

    2025

  112. [120]

    The effect of temperature on the reliability of electronic components,

    V . Lakshminarayanan and N. Sriraam, “The effect of temperature on the reliability of electronic components,” in2014 IEEE International Conference on Electronics, Computing and Communication Technolo- gies (CONECCT), 2014, pp. 1–6

    2014

  113. [121]

    Deep learning on edge TPUs,

    Y . Sun and A. M. Kist, “Deep learning on edge TPUs,” 2022. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2108.13732

    2022 arXiv

  114. [122]

    Exploration of TPUs for AI applications,

    D. S. Carri ´on and V . Prohaska, “Exploration of TPUs for AI applications,” 2023. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2309. 08918

    2023

  115. [123]

    State of art IoT and edge embedded systems for real-time machine vision applications,

    M. Meribout, A. Baobaid, M. O. Khaoua, V . K. Tiwari, and J. P. Pena, “State of art IoT and edge embedded systems for real-time machine vision applications,”IEEE Access, vol. 10, pp. 58 287–58 301, 2022

    2022

  116. [124]

    Real-time monitoring and predictive control of offshore engineering via secure 5G/6G AI-driven digital twins,

    X. He, Y . Zhang, Y . Jiang, C. Jia, D. Chen, and Y . Zhong, “Real-time monitoring and predictive control of offshore engineering via secure 5G/6G AI-driven digital twins,”IEEE Communications Standards Magazine, pp. 1–10, 2026

    2026

  117. [125]

    Over-the-air federated learning in digital twins empowered UA V swarms,

    B. Jiang, J. Du, C. Jiang, Z. Han, A. Alhammadi, and M. Debbah, “Over-the-air federated learning in digital twins empowered UA V swarms,”IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, vol. 23, no. 11, pp. 17 619–17 634, 2024

    2024

  118. [126]

    Digital-twin-empowered cluster formation via over-the-air compu- tation in UA V swarm networks,

    L. Zhang, X. Li, Y . Zhang, Y . Huang, H. Li, Z. Zhang, and M. Peng, “Digital-twin-empowered cluster formation via over-the-air compu- tation in UA V swarm networks,”IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, vol. 25, pp. 9940–9954, 2026

    2026

  119. [127]

    Hybrid intelligent reflecting surface and cell-free massive MIMO-aided over-the-air com- putation for digital twin,

    J. Di, N. Zhang, J. Wan, S. Li, and K. Wang, “Hybrid intelligent reflecting surface and cell-free massive MIMO-aided over-the-air com- putation for digital twin,” in2024 IEEE 44th International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems Workshops (ICDCSW), 2024, pp. 59–63

    2024

  120. [128]

    6G integrated non-terrestrial networks: Emerging technologies and challenges,

    S. Kota and G. Giambene, “6G integrated non-terrestrial networks: Emerging technologies and challenges,” in2021 IEEE International Conference on Communications Workshops (ICC Workshops), 2021, pp. 1–6

    2021

  121. [129]

    An in-depth survey on vir- tualization technologies in 6G integrated terrestrial and non-terrestrial networks,

    S. Ammar, C. Pong Lau, and B. Shihada, “An in-depth survey on vir- tualization technologies in 6G integrated terrestrial and non-terrestrial networks,”IEEE Open Journal of the Communications Society, vol. 5, pp. 3690–3734, 2024

    2024

  122. [130]

    High altitude platform stations: the new network energy efficiency enabler in the 6G era,

    T. Song, D. Lopez, M. Meo, N. Piovesan, and D. Renga, “High altitude platform stations: the new network energy efficiency enabler in the 6G era,” in2024 IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference (WCNC), 2024, pp. 1–6

    2024

  123. [131]

    DRL-leveraged and RIS-assisted hybrid network slicing for eMBB and URLLC co-existence in 6G systems,

    B. Adhikari, A. Shaharyar Khwaja, M. Jaseemuddin, and A. An- palagan, “DRL-leveraged and RIS-assisted hybrid network slicing for eMBB and URLLC co-existence in 6G systems,”IEEE Open Journal of the Communications Society, vol. 6, pp. 6156–6176, 2025

    2025

  124. [132]

    Deep reinforcement learning for integrated sensing and communication in RIS-assisted 6G V2X system,

    X. Long, Y . Zhao, H. Wu, and C.-Z. Xu, “Deep reinforcement learning for integrated sensing and communication in RIS-assisted 6G V2X system,”IEEE Internet of Things Journal, vol. 11, no. 24, pp. 39 834– 39 849, 2024

    2024

  125. [133]

    Explainable artificial intelligence: Advancements and limitations,

    H. I. Aysel, X. Cai, and A. Prugel-Bennett, “Explainable artificial intelligence: Advancements and limitations,”Applied Sciences, vol. 15, no. 13, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/ 15/13/7261

    2025

  126. [134]

    Quantum- inspired resource optimization for 6G networks: A survey,

    M. O. Butt, N. Waheed, T. Q. Duong, and W. Ejaz, “Quantum- inspired resource optimization for 6G networks: A survey,”IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, vol. 27, no. 5, pp. 2973–3019, 2025

    2025

  127. [135]

    Quantum machine intelligence for 6G URLLC,

    F. Zaman, A. Farooq, M. A. Ullah, H. Jung, H. Shin, and M. Z. Win, “Quantum machine intelligence for 6G URLLC,”IEEE Wireless Communications, vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 22–30, 2023

    2023

  128. [136]

    Quantum deep reinforcement learning for digital twin-enabled 6G networks and semantic communi- cations: Considerations for adoption and security,

    B. Narottama, A. U. Haq, J. A. Ansere, N. Simmons, B. Canberk, S. L. Cotton, H. Shin, and T. Q. Duong, “Quantum deep reinforcement learning for digital twin-enabled 6G networks and semantic communi- cations: Considerations for adoption and security,”IEEE Transactions on Networ...

    2025

  129. [137]

    Multiple access in the era of distributed computing and edge intelligence,

    N. G. Evgenidis, N. A. Mitsiou, V . I. Koutsioumpa, S. A. Tegos, P. D. Diamantoulakis, and G. K. Karagiannidis, “Multiple access in the era of distributed computing and edge intelligence,”Proceedings of the IEEE, vol. 112, no. 9, pp. 1497–1526, 2024

    2024

  130. [138]

    Towards native AI in 6G standardization: The roadmap of semantic communication,

    P. Zhang, X. Xu, M. Sun, H. Gao, N. Ma, X. Wang, R. Zhang, J. Wang, and D. Niyato, “Towards native AI in 6G standardization: The roadmap of semantic communication,” 2026. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2509.12758

    2026

  131. [139]

    A digital twin based industrial au- tomation and control system security architecture,

    C. Gehrmann and M. Gunnarsson, “A digital twin based industrial au- tomation and control system security architecture,”IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 669–680, 2020

    2020

  132. [140]

    Digital twin integrity protection in distributed control systems,

    M. Ebrahimabadi, J. Bahrami, M. Younis, and N. Karimi, “Digital twin integrity protection in distributed control systems,” in2024 IEEE 21st Consumer Communications & Networking Conference (CCNC), 2024, pp. 540–545

    2024

  133. [141]

    Digital metrology for the internet of things,

    T. Mustap ¨a¨a, J. Autiosalo, P. Nikander, J. E. Siegel, and R. Viitala, “Digital metrology for the internet of things,” in2020 Global Internet of Things Summit (GIoTS), 2020, pp. 1–6

    2020

  134. [142]

    Smart contract-based access control scheme for blockchain assisted 6G-enabled IoT-based big data driven healthcare cyber physical sys- tems,

    S. Saha, A. Kumar Das, M. Wazid, Y . Park, S. Garg, and M. Alrashoud, “Smart contract-based access control scheme for blockchain assisted 6G-enabled IoT-based big data driven healthcare cyber physical sys- tems,”IEEE Transactions on Consumer Electronics, vol. 70, no. 4, pp. 69...

    2024

  135. [143]

    The role of smart contract blockchain in 6G wireless communication system,

    H. Taherdoost, “The role of smart contract blockchain in 6G wireless communication system,”Procedia Computer Science, vol. 215, pp. 44–50, 2022, 4th International Conference on Innovative Data Communication Technology and Application. [Online]. Available: https://www.sciencedi...

    2022

  136. [144]

    A survey on federated learning: challenges and applications,

    J. Wen, Z. Zhang, Y . Lan, Z. Cui, J. Cai, and W. Zhang, “A survey on federated learning: challenges and applications,”Int. J. Mach. Learn. Cybern., vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 513–535, 2023

    2023

  137. [145]

    Trustworthy digital twins in the industrial internet of things with blockchain,

    S. Suhail, R. Hussain, R. Jurdak, and C. S. Hong, “Trustworthy digital twins in the industrial internet of things with blockchain,”IEEE Internet Computing, vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 58–67, 2022

    2022

  138. [146]

    Securing federated learning enabled NWDAF architecture with partial homomorphic encryption,

    C. Zhou and N. Ansari, “Securing federated learning enabled NWDAF architecture with partial homomorphic encryption,”IEEE Networking Letters, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 299–303, 2023

    2023

  139. [147]

    Privacy-preserving federated learning for data heterogeneity in 6G mobile networks,

    C. Zhang, X. Ren, W. Zhang, Y . Yuan, Z. Xiong, C. Li, and L. Zhu, “Privacy-preserving federated learning for data heterogeneity in 6G mobile networks,”IEEE Network, vol. 39, no. 2, pp. 134–141, 2025

    2025

  140. [148]

    Federated learning for 6G security: A survey on threats, solutions, and research directions,

    C. d. Alwis, O. Aouedi, J. Xu, S. Wang, Y . Siriwardhana, T. Hewa, E. Zeydan, C. Sandeepa, and M. Liyanage, “Federated learning for 6G security: A survey on threats, solutions, and research directions,”IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, vol. 28, pp. 4883–4914, 2026. PREP...

    2026

  141. [2014]

    Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/1411.1784

    [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/1411.1784

    arXiv

  142. [2020]

    Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2009.00454

    [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2009.00454

    2009 arXiv

  143. [2025]

    Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.08080

    [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.08080

Pith tools

Reviewed August 16, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.