Interacting Supernovae: a Radio and X-ray Strategy to Constrain the Structure of the Circumstellar Medium

Irene Tamborra; Leonardo Dinoi; Shunke Ai

REVIEW 4 major objections 4 minor 93 references

Interacting Supernovae: a Radio and X-ray Strategy to Constrain the Structure of the Circumstellar Medium

T0 review · 4 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-16 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper claims that the shape of a supernova's circumstellar medium can be read off from two normalized rise-time ratios of the radio light curve, and that SN 1993j and SN 2023ixf are both consistent with an hourglass-shaped wind seen…

desk verdict A useful new radio rise-time diagnostic for CSM geometry, packed inside a model whose per-angle shock dynamics needs a validation step before the two-SN fits are taken at face value. read the letter →

arxiv 2608.12464 v1 pith:TUCXYFU6 submitted 2026-08-12 astro-ph.HE

Shunke Ai , Irene Tamborra , Leonardo Dinoi This is my paper · ORCID

classification astro-ph.HE

keywords circumstellarmediumsupernovainteractionradiolightcurvesX-rayemissionfree-freeabsorptionCSMgeometrySN1993J2023ixf

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper tries to establish that the geometry of the dense gas surrounding an exploding star can be determined from the early rise of the supernova's radio light curve. Modeling spherical, disk-shaped, and hourglass-shaped circumstellar media with the same wind-like radial density falloff, it finds that two normalized rise times, the time from 1% to 10% of peak flux and the time from 10% of peak to peak, cluster in different parts of a diagnostic plane for each shape. It further argues that the post-peak radio decay distinguishes a wind-like radial profile from a non-wind profile, and that X-rays can corroborate the radio inference. Applied to SN 1993j and SN 2023ixf, the strategy matches the multi-wavelength observations with an hourglass circumstellar medium seen equator-on, without needing the non-wind density profiles previously invoked.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing mechanism is the per-angle thin-shell shock model: momentum conservation is solved separately for each polar angle using the local CSM density $\rho_{\mathrm{CSM},i}(\theta,R)=D_i(\theta)R^{-s}$, with $D_i(\theta)$ encoding spherical, disk, or hourglass angular structure. From the resulting shock radius $R_{\mathrm{cd}}(t,\theta)$, the radio and X-ray fluxes are projected onto the observer through a limb-darkened surface integral, and free-free absorption by the unshocked CSM shapes the rising light curve. The diagnostic pair of normalized rise times, $\Delta t_{0.01-0.1}/t_{0.1}$ and $\Delta t_{0.1-\mathrm{peak}}/t_{\mathrm{peak}}$, is what carries the geometric information.

What would settle it

Run a two-dimensional radiation-hydrodynamics simulation of the same hourglass and disk density profiles and compare the predicted $\Delta t_{0.01-0.1}/t_{0.1}$ versus $\Delta t_{0.1-\mathrm{peak}}/t_{\mathrm{peak}}$ positions with the per-angle thin-shell model; if lateral flows move points across the shape boundaries, the diagnostic is not robust. A second test is observational: a well-sampled 10 GHz rise for a supernova with independent polarimetric evidence of a non-spherical CSM that lands in the spherical cluster would contradict the clustering.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is a diagnostic clustering: for an ensemble of otherwise different supernova models with free-free absorption dominating, spherical CSM models occupy the region $\Delta t_{0.01-0.1}/t_{0.1}<0.3$ and $\Delta t_{0.1-\mathrm{peak}}/t_{\mathrm{peak}}<0.65$, while hourglass and disk models fall outside it. When the CSM density along the line of sight is higher than in other directions, the early radio rise is shallower; when it is lower, the rise is steep and flattens near the peak, and the reverse-shock component in X-rays is negligible. The paper then tests the method on SN 1993j and SN 2023ixf and argues that both are consistent with an hourglass CSM with a wind density profile ($s=2$) observed equator-on, offering an alternative to earlier spherical fits with shallower density profiles.

Load-bearing premise

The calculation assumes each direction on the supernova expands independently, with no sideways pressure, mixing, or flow between neighboring directions; if lateral coupling is significant in a real aspherical CSM, the predicted radio and X-ray diagnostics would shift.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

A well-sampled early radio light curve at about 10 GHz can place an interacting supernova into a CSM-shape class using only two rise-time ratios, before the light curve peaks.
A shallow early rise signals that the observer's line of sight passes through denser CSM than other directions, while a steep rise that flattens near the peak signals the opposite.
In the low-line-of-sight-density case the reverse-shock X-ray emission is negligible, so an observed late soft X-ray excess would argue against that geometry.
The post-peak decay slope $\omega$ stays near $-1$ for all shapes when the radial profile is wind-like ($s=2$), so the decay phase can separate wind-like from non-wind CSM profiles.
For SN 1993j and SN 2023ixf, an hourglass CSM with $s=2$ observed equator-on accounts for both radio and X-ray data, meaning some earlier non-wind profile inferences may not be unique.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

A natural extension is to apply the same rise-time plane to other interaction-powered transients, such as Type IIn supernovae or fast blue optical transients, whenever free-free absorption dominates over synchrotron self-absorption.
If the hourglass-wind explanation is right, some published cases of shallow CSM density profiles in spherical models could be reinterpreted as aspherical wind CSM seen through a particular line of sight; checking the post-peak decay slope would discriminate.
High-cadence radio monitoring in the first days to weeks should act as a rapid classifier for CSM shape, potentially flagging aspherical mass loss before X-ray or polarimetric follow-up.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

Colleague,

The one thing you should know: this paper gives observers a practical new handle on CSM geometry. The normalized rise times of the 10 GHz light curve, Δt0.01-0.1/t0.1 and Δt0.1-peak/tpeak, cluster by shape in Fig. 8, and the decay-slope ω separates wind-like from non-wind profiles. Those diagnostics are new, and the hourglass wind-profile reinterpretation of SN 1993j and SN 2023ixf is a genuine alternative to the spherical s≠2 fits in the literature.

Credit where it's due: the framework is standard Chevalier-Fransson machinery, clearly extended to anisotropic CSM. The parameter choices are reasonable and the paper is candid about where its methods break down—synchrotron self-absorption, high acceleration efficiency, inverse Compton. They also flag the degeneracy with the radial index s. That honesty is real.

The soft spots are in the right places. The load-bearing assumption is Eq. 5: each polar angle evolves an independent thin shell using only the local density, with no lateral pressure gradient or transverse flow. With a factor-10 density contrast, shock radius varies by ~20% across angles. That may be fine, but the paper does not test it against the 2D simulations it cites. If lateral coupling smooths the shell geometry, the Fig. 8 clusters can shift or merge. This is not a fatal flaw—for modest anisotropy it may be a good approximation—but it needs a validation paragraph or a comparison simulation.

Second, the two-SN 'excellent agreement' is over-parameterized. Table II has many free parameters, fitted with no uncertainties and no model comparison to the competing spherical non-wind models. So the fits demonstrate flexibility more than predictive power. The method itself is also calibrated on the same model used to interpret the data; that is self-consistent but not out-of-sample.

Third, a smaller point: for SN 1993j they appeal to a nearly spherical interaction shell in which density variations affect only emission, not geometry—a different regime from Eq. 9—without specifying when each applies.

The paper is a solid contribution for anyone working on radio and X-ray observations of interacting SNe. It deserves a serious referee. I'd push for a validation of the per-angle dynamics against multidimensional simulations, uncertainty on the fit parameters, and a proper comparison with the s≠2 models. As is, it's a conditional accept, not a full one.

Referee Report

4 major / 4 minor

Summary. The manuscript models radio and X-ray emission from core-collapse supernovae interacting with aspherical circumstellar media (spherical, disk, and hourglass shapes). The shock dynamics is solved angle-by-angle with a thin-shell momentum equation, and the resulting synchrotron, free-free absorption, and X-ray bremsstrahlung emission are projected onto the observer. The authors identify two rise-time ratios of the radio light curve that cluster by CSM shape, propose the post-peak decay slope as a probe of the radial density index, and apply the method to SN 1993j and SN 2023ixf, claiming excellent agreement for an hourglass CSM with a wind-like profile observed near the equatorial plane.

Significance. If the modeling assumptions hold, the paper offers a practically useful strategy: the rising part of the radio light curve is routinely observed, and the clustering in Fig. 8 would allow a rough geometric classification of the CSM without requiring detailed spectral modeling. The analytic treatment is transparent, and the parameter scans (mass-loss rate, ejecta kinetic energy, microphysical parameters) give explicit, falsifiable predictions, including the location of spherical CSM in the rise-time plane and the approximate value om ≈ -1 for s = 2. The two object studies demonstrate that a wind-like hourglass CSM can reproduce the radio and X-ray data, providing an alternative to the non-wind spherical interpretations in the literature. However, the significance of the central claim depends on the validity of the independent-angle thin-shell approximation and on whether the claimed fits constitute genuine model discrimination rather than model flexibility.

major comments (4)

[II.B, Eq. (5)] The per-angle independent thin-shell dynamics is the load-bearing assumption of the paper, but it is not validated. Equation (5) solves momentum conservation separately for each polar angle using only the local CSM density, with no lateral pressure gradients, transverse flows, or mixing. For the benchmark factor-10 density contrast (Table I), Eq. (9) gives R_cd proportional to D_i(theta)^(-1/10), i.e., roughly a 20% angular variation in shock radius. In a real aspherical CSM the shocked shell is a continuous fluid, and post-shock pressure gradients act on a timescale comparable to the dynamical time. Since R_cd(theta,t) enters the projected flux in Eq. (18) and the free-free absorption column in Eq. (55), every diagnostic region in Figs. 6, 8, and 9 inherits this uncertainty. The cited multidimensional simulations, Refs. [13] and [57], are not used to test whether the angle-by-angle shell is hydrodynamically reasonable. I request a concrete comparison of R_cd(theta,t) and the predicted light curves with two-dimensional simulations for the same CSM profiles, or an explicit estimate of the lateral coupling terms.
[VI and Table II] The claim of 'excellent agreement' for SN 1993j and SN 2023ixf is not supported by a statistical analysis. Table II lists at least eight adjusted parameters (E_ej, Mdot(theta_obs), A, beta, eta_e,th, epsilon_e, epsilon_B, p) with no uncertainties, and Figs. 10 and 11 show model curves overlaid on data without chi-square, likelihood, or information-criterion values. The underlying alternative models of Refs. [42] and [49], a spherical CSM with s = 1.5 and s = 1.3, are not fitted to the same datasets with the same number of parameters, so the paper has not demonstrated that the hourglass model is preferred rather than merely flexible. I request a model-comparison analysis (e.g., BIC or a likelihood ratio) and parameter uncertainties, or a clear statement that the fits are illustrative rather than competitive.
[VI.A, SN 1993j] The near-spherical VLBI shell of SN 1993j is not obviously compatible with the hourglass model used for the fit. The text argues that the interaction shell can be nearly spherical if the CSM density is too low to affect the expansion, and that angular density variations then affect only the emission. However, the model used to produce the light curves is Eq. (9), in which R_cd is explicitly angle-dependent; with n = 12, s = 2, and A = 10, R_cd varies by roughly 20% between the dense and tenuous directions. No quantitative criterion is given for the 'emission-only' regime, and the best-fit parameters (Table II) are not checked against the VLBI constraint. The paper should either show that the best-fit A and beta give an R_cd variation below the observational limit, or explicitly state that the VLBI near-sphericity constraint is being set aside.
[V.A, Fig. 8] For SN 2023ixf the observations do not extend to 1% of the peak luminosity, so Delta t_{0.01-0.1} cannot be extracted from the data. The magenta dashed line in Fig. 8 is therefore an extrapolation, not an observed point, and the placement of SN 2023ixf in the discriminating plane does not test the model in the same way as the SN 1993j point. The paper should state this explicitly in the text and caveat the inference accordingly; at present the SN 2023ixf panel is at best a consistency statement, not a confirmation of the hourglass geometry.

minor comments (4)

[VI.A] After describing the X-ray comparison for SN 1993j, the text says 'Our findings are shown in the right panel of Fig. 10, and our model is in excellent agreement with the radio data'; the right panel of Fig. 10 is the radio panel, while the X-ray data appear in the left panel, and the intended sentence should refer to the left panel and to the X-ray data.
[Fig. 9 caption] The caption lists 's = 1.3 in blue, s = 1.5 in orange, s = 1.3 in green, and s = 2 in gray'; the second occurrence of 1.3 is presumably a typo for 1.7, which is the value discussed in the text of Sec. V.C.
[Eq. (57)] The phrase 'L_{0.1,dec}/L_peak = 0.1 accounts for a decrease of 10%' is confusing: the ratio 0.1 means the luminosity has decreased to 10% of its peak value, i.e., by 90%, not by 10%.
[IV.B] The sentence 'The synchrotron spectra are flatten out for asymmetric CSM shapes' contains a grammatical error and should read 'flatten out'.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 4.0 of 10

X-ray 'corroboration' is a joint fit because η_e,th is adjusted; the central radio rise-time method is otherwise self-contained.

fitted input called prediction [Sec. VI A (SN 1993j X-ray paragraph after Fig. 10) and Table II caption/row]
"Using the SN best-fitting parameters derived from radio (cf. Table II), we model the X-ray emission and compare the latter with the X-ray data from Ref. [44]. Our findings are shown in the right panel of Fig. 10, and our model is in excellent agreement with the radio data. ... Model parameters adopted to fit the light curves in X-rays and radio of SN 1993j and SN 2023ixf ... Electron heating efficiency (ηe,th) 0.3 0.007"

The X-ray luminosity entering the model is proportional to the electron heating efficiency ηe,th (Eq. 19). Table II lists ηe,th as a fit parameter for each SN (0.3 for SN 1993j, 0.007 for SN 2023ixf), and the table caption states that its parameters are adopted to fit the X-ray and radio light curves. Therefore the X-ray 'corroboration' is not an independent cross-check of the radio-derived CSM geometry: a free normalization parameter has been adjusted to the same X-ray data it is then said to agree with. The agreement is a joint fit, not an out-of-sample prediction.

full rationale

The central derivation is not circular. Equations 5, 9-12, 18, and 55 define an explicit forward model mapping CSM geometry and density to projected radio and X-ray light curves, and Fig. 8 translates model light curves into dimensionless rise-time ratios over an ensemble of ejecta, mass-loss, and microphysical parameters. The observed rise times of SN 1993j and SN 2023ixf are measured from published light curves rather than from the fitted model, so their placement in Fig. 8 is an independent diagnostic. The radio light-curve comparisons in Figs. 10-11 are model fits with shape and efficiency parameters adjusted to the data, which is standard practice and not circular by itself. The one genuine circular element is the X-ray check: the X-ray luminosity is proportional to ηe,th, and Table II treats ηe,th as a parameter fitted to the X-ray and radio light curves. Thus the X-ray agreement is partly enforced by construction, weakening the claim that X-rays independently corroborate the radio-inferred geometry. The per-angle thin-shell approximation in Eq. 5 is a load-bearing physical assumption that is not validated against multidimensional simulations, but that is a correctness/robustness concern rather than circularity, since it is not defined in terms of the target result.

Assumptions & free parameters 8 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central results depend on a set of benchmark and fitted parameters (Tables I and II) for the ejecta, CSM, and radiation efficiencies, on the assumed functional forms for the aspherical CSM, and on the per-angle independent thin-shell dynamics. No new physical entities are introduced. The main burden on the reader is the unvalidated per-angle dynamics and the freedom to fit shape and efficiency parameters to the two SNe.

free parameters (8)

Spherically symmetric equivalent mass-loss rate along line of sight, Mdot(theta_obs) = Benchmark 1e-4 Msun/yr; SN 1993j 5e-6 Msun/yr; SN 2023ixf 1.5e-5 Msun/yr
Normalizes CSM density via Eq. 15; in the two-SN fits it is adjusted to match radio and X-ray light curves.
Hourglass parameters A and beta = Benchmark A=10, beta=2; SN 1993j A=10, beta=2.2; SN 2023ixf A=20, beta=1.2
Control density contrast and angular width of the hourglass density profile (Eq. 4); fitted to reproduce the observed rise times.
Disk parameters m and theta_CSM = m=2, theta_CSM=60 deg (benchmark)
Shape parameters in Eq. 3 chosen by hand to give a factor 10 density contrast; not fitted to SNe but define the template used in the diagnostic.
Ejecta kinetic energy E_ej = Benchmark 1e51 erg; SN 1993j 5e51 erg; SN 2023ixf 2e51 erg
Sets shock dynamics; adjusted in fits.
Electron heating efficiency eta_e,th = Benchmark 0.5; SN 1993j 0.3; SN 2023ixf 0.007
Thermal X-ray luminosity normalization; fitted to match X-ray data; the SN 2023ixf value is unusually low.
Electron energy fraction epsilon_e = Benchmark 1e-2; SN 1993j 5e-2; SN 2023ixf 3.5e-2
Synchrotron luminosity normalization; fitted.
Magnetic energy fraction epsilon_B = Benchmark 1e-3; SN 1993j 1e-4; SN 2023ixf 1e-4
Sets synchrotron self-absorption; fitted.
Electron power-law index p = Benchmark 3; SN 1993j 2.3; SN 2023ixf 3
Spectral index of accelerated electrons; fitted for SN 1993j.

assumptions (6)

standard math The SN ejecta follow the double power-law density profile of Eq. 7 with n=12 and delta=0.5 (Matzner & McKee 1999).
Used to compute the reverse shock mass and the shell dynamics in Sec. II B; parameters are benchmark assumptions from Type II SN observations.
domain assumption Momentum conservation is applied independently for each polar angle theta (Eq. 5), with no lateral pressure coupling between adjacent angles.
This is the paper's extension to anisotropic CSM and is the key approximation behind all geometry-dependent light curves; it is not validated against multidimensional simulations.
domain assumption The unshocked CSM is fully ionized hydrogen, with Thomson scattering (Eq. 33) and free-free absorption with T_CSM = 1e5 K (Eq. 55).
The radio diagnostic relies on free-free absorption being the dominant absorption mechanism; a neutral CSM would introduce bound-free absorption, which is acknowledged in Sec. VII as a caveat.
domain assumption Electrons and protons reach equipartition behind each shock (Eqs. 25-27), so the electron temperature is given by the Rankine-Hugoniot estimates in Eqs. 21-22.
Justified by comparing equilibration and cooling timescales in Sec. III; this sets the X-ray spectral shape.
standard math Emission from each surface element follows the limb-darkening intensity law of Eq. 17 from Mihalas (1970), integrated over the visible hemisphere in Eq. 18.
Adopted from stellar atmosphere theory; determines how the projected emission from an aspherical shell is computed.
ad hoc to paper The disk and hourglass density profiles in Eqs. 3 and 4 are representative of real aspherical CSM structures.
The hourglass profile is explicitly a toy model, and the disk profile is inspired by Ref. [57]; the diagnostic clustering in Fig. 8 is computed only for these assumed functional forms.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Interacting Supernovae: a Radio and X-ray Strategy to Constrain the Structure of the Circumstellar Medium." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/TUCXYFU6

@misc{pith2026260812464,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Interacting Supernovae: a Radio and X-ray Strategy to Constrain the Structure of the Circumstellar Medium},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/TUCXYFU6}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2608.12464}
}

read the original abstract

The interaction of supernova (SN) ejecta with the dense circumstellar medium (CSM) converts shock kinetic energy into radiation across multiple wavebands. We investigate the dependence of the X-ray and radio emission on the CSM geometry, considering spherical, hourglass, and disk shapes for the CSM. We find that the spectral and light-curve properties, both in X-ray and radio, significantly differ for spherical and non-spherical CSM structures. For a non-spherical CSM, the radio light curve flattens out near the peak frequency, due to efficient free-free absorption by the unshocked CSM. Moreover, the early rise of the radio light curve is shallower when the CSM density along the observer line of sight is larger than that in other directions. If the CSM density is lower along the observer line of sight, the radio light curve flattens near its peak, and the reverse-shock component is negligible in X-rays. Building on these features, we provide a method to constrain the CSM structure based on the rising part the radio light curve in the proximity of its peak; we show that the decay part of the radio light curve, after its peak, carries insight on whether the CSM density profile is wind-like or not. We further adopt the X-ray signal to corroborate the information extracted from radio. We test our strategy on SN 1993j and SN 2023ixf. For both SNe, we find that an asymmetric CSM is in excellent agreement with radio and X-ray observations and provides a viable alternative to non-wind scenarios suggested in the literature. Our findings highlight the crucial insight provided by radio and X-ray signals into the mass-loss history of the SN progenitor.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2608.12464 by the authors.

**Figure 1.** FIG. 1. Schematic representation of an interacting SN (not to scale). The central compact object is shown in black, surrounded [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 2.** FIG. 2. Sketch illustrating the spherical, disk and hourglass CSM shapes, from left to right, respectively. The color hues mark [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** FIG. 3. Spectral evolution of bremsstrahlung radiation, peak [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_3.png] view at source ↗

Figures from the paper (8 more)

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: FIG. 4. X-ray spectra (left) and light curves (right) for spherical, hourglass, and disk CSM structures for our benchmark SN, see [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_4.png]

**Figure 5.** Figure 5: FIG. 5. Spectral evolution of synchrotron radiation from the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_5.png]

**Figure 6.** Figure 6: FIG. 6. Radio spectra (left) and light curves (right) for spherical, hourglass, and disk CSM geometries for our benchmark [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_6.png]

**Figure 7.** Figure 7: FIG. 7. Same as Fig [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_7.png]

**Figure 8.** Figure 8: FIG. 8. Scatter plot of the rise times of the radio light curves [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_8.png]

**Figure 9.** Figure 9: FIG. 9 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_9.png]

**Figure 10.** Figure 10: FIG. 10. X-ray in the energy range 0 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_10.png]

**Figure 11.** Figure 11: FIG. 11. Same as Fig [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_11.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

93 extracted references · 33 canonical work pages

[13]

J. M. Blondin, P. Lundqvist, and R. A. Chevalier, Axisym- metric Circumstellar Interaction in Supernovae, Astro- phys. J.472, 257 (1996), arXiv:astro-ph/9601137 [astro- ph]

work page Pith review arXiv 1996
[57]

Supernova ejecta interacting with a circumstellar disk. I. two-dimensional radiation-hydrodynamic simulations

A. Suzuki, T. J. Moriya, and T. Takiwaki, Supernova Ejecta Interacting with a Circumstellar Disk. I. Two- dimensional Radiation-hydrodynamic Simulations, Astro- phys. J.887, 249 (2019), arXiv:1911.09261 [astro-ph.HE]

work page Pith review arXiv 2019
[42]

Fransson, P

C. Fransson, P. Lundqvist, and R. A. Chevalier, Circum- stellar Interaction in SN 1993J, Astrophys. J.461, 993 (1996)

work page 1996
[49]

A. J. Nayanaet al., Dinosaur in a Haystack: X-Ray View of the Entrails of SN 2023ixf and the Radio Afterglow of Its Interaction with the Medium Spawned by the Pro- genitor Star (Paper I), Astrophys. J.985, 51 (2025), arXiv:2411.02647 [astro-ph.HE]

arXiv 2025
[1]

Smith, Mass Loss: Its Effect on the Evolution and Fate of High-Mass Stars, Ann

N. Smith, Mass Loss: Its Effect on the Evolution and Fate of High-Mass Stars, Ann. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 52, 487 (2014), arXiv:1402.1237 [astro-ph.SR]

arXiv 2014
[2]

R. A. Chevalier and C. Fransson, Thermal and Non- thermal Emission from Circumstellar Interaction, inHand- book of Supernovae, edited by A. W. Alsabti and P. Mur- din (2017) p. 875

2017
[3]

Chandra, Circumstellar Interaction in Supernovae in Dense Environments—An Observational Perspective, Space

P. Chandra, Circumstellar Interaction in Supernovae in Dense Environments—An Observational Perspective, Space. Sci. Rev.214, 27 (2018), arXiv:1712.07405 [astro- ph.HE]

arXiv 2018
[4]

Marguttiet al., A Panchromatic View of the Rest- less SN 2009ip Reveals the Explosive Ejection of a Massive Star Envelope, Astrophys

R. Marguttiet al., A Panchromatic View of the Rest- less SN 2009ip Reveals the Explosive Ejection of a Massive Star Envelope, Astrophys. J.780, 21 (2014), arXiv:1306.0038 [astro-ph.HE]

arXiv 2014

Show all 93 references

[5]

W. V. Jacobson-Gal´ anet al., Final Moments. I. Precursor Emission, Envelope Inflation, and Enhanced Mass Loss Preceding the Luminous Type II Supernova 2020tlf, Astro- phys. J.924, 15 (2022), arXiv:2109.12136 [astro-ph.HE]

2022 arXiv
[6]

Gaglianoet al., An Early-time Optical and Ultraviolet Excess in the Type-Ic SN 2020oi, Astrophys

A. Gaglianoet al., An Early-time Optical and Ultraviolet Excess in the Type-Ic SN 2020oi, Astrophys. J.924, 55 (2022), arXiv:2105.09963 [astro-ph.HE]

2022 arXiv
[7]

E. O. Ofeket al., SN 2010jl: Optical to Hard X- Ray Observations Reveal an Explosion Embedded in a Ten Solar Mass Cocoon, Astrophys. J.781, 42 (2014), arXiv:1307.2247 [astro-ph.HE]

2014 arXiv
[8]

N. L. Strotjohann, Bright, Months-long Stellar Outbursts Announce the Explosion of Interaction-powered Super- novae, Astrophys. J.907, 99 (2021), arXiv:2010.11196 [astro-ph.HE]

2021 arXiv
[9]

Hiramatsu, From Discovery to the First Month of the Type II Supernova 2023ixf: High and Variable Mass Loss in the Final Year before Explosion, Astrophys

D. Hiramatsu, From Discovery to the First Month of the Type II Supernova 2023ixf: High and Variable Mass Loss in the Final Year before Explosion, Astrophys. J. Lett. 955, L8 (2023), arXiv:2307.03165 [astro-ph.HE]

2023 arXiv
[10]

Qinet al., The progenitor star of SN 2023ixf: a mas- sive red supergiant with enhanced, episodic pre-supernova mass loss, Mon

Y.-J. Qinet al., The progenitor star of SN 2023ixf: a mas- sive red supergiant with enhanced, episodic pre-supernova mass loss, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.534, 271 (2024), arXiv:2309.10022 [astro-ph.SR]

2024 arXiv
[11]

R. A. Chevalier, Self-similar solutions for the interaction of stellar ejecta with an external medium., Astrophys. J. 258, 790 (1982)

1982
[12]

R. A. Chevalier and C. Fransson, Emission from Cir- cumstellar Interaction in Normal Type II Supernovae, Astrophys. J.420, 268 (1994)

1994
[14]

A. R. McDonaldet al., Global very long-baseline inter- ferometry observations of compact radio sources in M82, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.322, 100 (2001), arXiv:astro- ph/0010466 [astro-ph]

2001
[15]

N. N. Chugai and I. J. Danziger, SN 1988Z: low-mass ejecta colliding with the clumpy wind?, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.268, 173 (1994)

1994
[16]

N. N. Chugai, I. J. Danziger, and M. della Valle, Optical spectrum of SN 1978K: emission from shocked clouds in the circumstellar wind, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.276, 530 (1995)

1995
[17]

Franssonet al., Optical and Ultraviolet Spectroscopy of SN 1995N: Evidence for Strong Circumstellar Interaction, Astrophys

C. Franssonet al., Optical and Ultraviolet Spectroscopy of SN 1995N: Evidence for Strong Circumstellar Interaction, Astrophys. J.572, 350 (2002), arXiv:astro-ph/0108149 [astro-ph]

2002 arXiv
[18]

J. M. Blondin and P. Lundqvist, Formation of the Cir- cumstellar Shell around SN 1987A, Astrophys. J.405, 337 (1993)

1993
[19]

R. A. Chevalier, The radio and X-ray emission from type II supernovae., Astrophys. J.259, 302 (1982)

1982
[20]

R. A. Chevalier, Synchrotron Self-Absorption in Radio Supernovae, Astrophys. J.499, 810 (1998)

1998
[21]

Petropoulou, A

M. Petropoulou, A. Kamble, and L. Sironi, Radio syn- chrotron emission from secondary electrons in interaction- powered supernovae, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.460, 44 (2016), arXiv:1603.00891 [astro-ph.HE]

2016 arXiv
[22]

Murase, T

K. Murase, T. A. Thompson, B. C. Lacki, and J. F. Beacom, New class of high-energy transients from crashes of supernova ejecta with massive circumstellar material shells, Phys. Rev. D84, 043003 (2011), arXiv:1012.2834 [astro-ph.HE]

2011 arXiv
[23]

Murase, T

K. Murase, T. A. Thompson, and E. O. Ofek, Probing cosmic ray ion acceleration with radio-submm and gamma- ray emission from interaction-powered supernovae, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.440, 2528 (2014), arXiv:1311.6778 [astro-ph.HE]

2014 arXiv
[24]

Sarmah, S

P. Sarmah, S. Chakraborty, I. Tamborra, and K. Auchettl, High energy particles from young supernovae: gamma- ray and neutrino connections, JCAP2022, 011 (2022), arXiv:2204.03663 [astro-ph.HE]

2022 arXiv
[25]

Pitik, I

T. Pitik, I. Tamborra, M. Lincetto, and A. Franckowiak, 20 Optically informed searches of high-energy neutrinos from interaction-powered supernovae, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.524, 3366 (2023), arXiv:2306.01833 [astro-ph.HE]

2023 arXiv
[26]

Guarini, I

E. Guarini, I. Tamborra, R. Margutti, and E. Ramirez- Ruiz, Transients stemming from collapsing massive stars: The missing pieces to advance joint observations of pho- tons and high-energy neutrinos, Phys. Rev. D108, 083035 (2023), arXiv:2308.03840 [astro-ph.HE]

2023 arXiv
[27]

Sarmah, S

P. Sarmah, S. Chakraborty, I. Tamborra, and K. Auchettl, Gamma rays and neutrinos from supernovae of type Ib and Ic with late time emission, Phys. Rev. D108, 103033 (2023), arXiv:2303.13576 [astro-ph.HE]

2023 arXiv
[28]

Petropoulouet al., Point-source and diffuse high- energy neutrino emission from Type IIn supernovae, Mon

M. Petropoulouet al., Point-source and diffuse high- energy neutrino emission from Type IIn supernovae, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.470, 1881 (2017), arXiv:1705.06752 [astro-ph.HE]

2017 arXiv
[29]

Tamborra, Neutrinos from explosive transients at the dawn of multi-messenger astronomy, Nature Rev

I. Tamborra, Neutrinos from explosive transients at the dawn of multi-messenger astronomy, Nature Rev. Phys. 7, 285 (2025), arXiv:2412.09699 [astro-ph.HE]

2025 arXiv
[30]

A. J. van Marle, N. Smith, S. P. Owocki, and B. van Veelen, Numerical models of collisions between core- collapse supernovae and circumstellar shells, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.407, 2305 (2010), arXiv:1004.2791 [astro-ph.HE]

2010 arXiv
[31]

Dessartet al., Models of interacting supernovae and their spectral diversity, Mon

L. Dessartet al., Models of interacting supernovae and their spectral diversity, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.458, 2094 (2016), arXiv:1602.02977 [astro-ph.SR]

2016 arXiv
[32]

Vlasis, L

A. Vlasis, L. Dessart, and E. Audit, Two-dimensional radiation hydrodynamics simulations of superluminous in- teracting supernovae of Type IIn, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.458, 1253 (2016), arXiv:1602.05864 [astro-ph.HE]

2016 arXiv
[33]

Marguttiet al., Ejection of the Massive Hydrogen-rich Envelope Timed with the Collapse of the Stripped SN 2014C, Astrophys

R. Marguttiet al., Ejection of the Massive Hydrogen-rich Envelope Timed with the Collapse of the Stripped SN 2014C, Astrophys. J.835, 140 (2017), arXiv:1601.06806 [astro-ph.HE]

2017 arXiv
[34]

A. L. Ibiket al., PS1-11aop: Probing the Mass-loss History of a Luminous Interacting Supernova Prior to Its Final Eruption with Multiwavelength Observations, Astrophys. J.979, 16 (2025), arXiv:2410.15140 [astro-ph.HE]

2025 arXiv
[35]

F. De Colleet al., Constraining inhomogeneities and asym- metries in SNe, FBOTs, and other high-energy transients from unresolved radio observations, arXiv:2606.12846 [astro-ph.HE] (2026)

2026 arXiv
[36]

E. Wistonet al., Old and Bright: The Remarkable Ra- dio Brightening of the Engine-driven SN 2012au Sev- eral Years After Explosion Signals the Birth of a PWN, arXiv:2606.20836 [astro-ph.HE] (2026)

2026 arXiv
[37]

Riperoet al., Supernova 1993J in NGC 3031, IAU Circ

J. Riperoet al., Supernova 1993J in NGC 3031, IAU Circ. 5731, 1 (1993)

1993
[38]

B. P. Schmidtet al., The unusual supernova SN1993J in the galaxy M81, Nature (London)364, 600 (1993)

1993
[39]

J. C. Wheeleret al., Early Observations of SN 1993J in M81 at McDonald Observatory, Astrophys. J. Lett.417, L71 (1993)

1993
[40]

P. J. Bensonet al., Light Curves of SN 1993J From The Keck Northeast Astronomy Consortium, Astron. J.107, 1453 (1994)

1994
[41]

Type IIb

A. V. Filippenko, T. Matheson, and L. C. Ho, The “Type IIb” Supernova 1993J in M81: A Close Relative of Type Ib Supernovae, Astrophys. J. Lett.415, L103 (1993)

1993
[43]

Mathesonet al., Detailed Analysis of Early to Late- Time Spectra of Supernova 1993J, Astron

T. Mathesonet al., Detailed Analysis of Early to Late- Time Spectra of Supernova 1993J, Astron. J.120, 1499 (2000), arXiv:astro-ph/0006264 [astro-ph]

2000 arXiv
[44]

Chandraet al., X-rays from the Explosion Site: 15 Years of Light Curves of SN 1993J, Astrophys

P. Chandraet al., X-rays from the Explosion Site: 15 Years of Light Curves of SN 1993J, Astrophys. J.699, 388 (2009), arXiv:0904.3955 [astro-ph.CO]

2009 arXiv
[45]

D. A. Perley, A. Gal-Yam, I. Irani, and E. Zimmerman, LT Classification of SN 2023ixf as a Type II Supernova in M101, Transient Name Server AstroNote119, 1 (2023)

2023
[46]

Yanget al., Multiband Simultaneous Photom- etry of Type II SN 2023ixf with Mephisto and the Twin 50 cm Telescopes, Astrophys

Y.-P. Yanget al., Multiband Simultaneous Photom- etry of Type II SN 2023ixf with Mephisto and the Twin 50 cm Telescopes, Astrophys. J.969, 126 (2024), arXiv:2405.08327 [astro-ph.HE]

2024 arXiv
[47]

G. Bianciardiet al., Multiband Photometry Evolution in the First Weeks of SN 2023ixf, a possible II-L Subtype Su- pernova, Transient Name Server AstroNote213, 1 (2023), arXiv:2307.05612 [astro-ph.SR]

2023 arXiv
[48]

P. D. Michelet al., The nebular spectra of SN 2023ixf: a lower mass, partially stripped progenitor may be the result of binary interaction, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 539, 633 (2025), arXiv:2503.13017 [astro-ph.HE]

2025 arXiv
[50]

S. S. Vasylyevet al., Early Time Spectropolarimetry of the Aspherical Type II Supernova SN 2023ixf, Astrophys. J. Lett.955, L37 (2023), arXiv:2307.01268 [astro-ph.HE]

2023 arXiv
[51]

Shresthaet al., Spectropolarimetry of SN 2023ixf Reveals Both Circumstellar Material and an Aspheri- cal Helium Core, Astrophys

M. Shresthaet al., Spectropolarimetry of SN 2023ixf Reveals Both Circumstellar Material and an Aspheri- cal Helium Core, Astrophys. J. Lett.982, L32 (2025), arXiv:2410.08199 [astro-ph.HE]

2025 arXiv
[52]

S. S. Vasylyevet al., Spectropolarimetric Evolution of SN 2023ixf: An Asymmetric Explosion in a Confined Aspherical Circumstellar Medium, Astrophys. J.1000, 18 (2026), arXiv:2505.03975 [astro-ph.HE]

2026 arXiv
[53]

D. C. Leonard, A. V. Filippenko, A. J. Barth, and T. Matheson, Evidence for Asphericity in the Type IIN Supernova SN 1998S, Astrophys. J.536, 239 (2000), arXiv:astro-ph/9908040 [astro-ph]

2000 arXiv
[54]

C. L. Gerardy, R. A. Fesen, P. H¨ oflich, and J. C. Wheeler, Detection of CO and Dust Emission in Near-Infrared Spec- tra of SN 1998S, Astron. J.119, 2968 (2000), arXiv:astro- ph/9912433 [astro-ph]

2000
[55]

J. E. Andrewset al., Optical and IR observations of SN 2013L, a Type IIn Supernova surrounded by asymmetric CSM, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.471, 4047 (2017), arXiv:1707.02538 [astro-ph.HE]

2017 arXiv
[56]

Smithet al., PTF11iqb: cool supergiant mass-loss that bridges the gap between Type IIn and normal su- pernovae, Mon

N. Smithet al., PTF11iqb: cool supergiant mass-loss that bridges the gap between Type IIn and normal su- pernovae, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.449, 1876 (2015), arXiv:1501.02820 [astro-ph.HE]

2015 arXiv
[58]

Hamuy, Observed and Physical Properties of Core- Collapse Supernovae, Astrophys

M. Hamuy, Observed and Physical Properties of Core- Collapse Supernovae, Astrophys. J.582, 905 (2003), arXiv:astro-ph/0209174 [astro-ph]

2003 arXiv
[59]

Martinezet al., Type II supernovae from the Carnegie Supernova Project-I

L. Martinezet al., Type II supernovae from the Carnegie Supernova Project-I. II. Physical parameter distributions from hydrodynamical modelling, Astron. Astrophys.660, A41 (2022), arXiv:2111.06529 [astro-ph.SR]

2022 arXiv
[60]

C. D. Matzner and C. F. McKee, The Expulsion of Stellar 21 Envelopes in Core-Collapse Supernovae, Astrophys. J. 510, 379 (1999), arXiv:astro-ph/9807046 [astro-ph]

1999 arXiv
[61]

Josselin and B

E. Josselin and B. Plez, Atmospheric dynamics and the mass loss process in red supergiant stars, Astron. Astro- phys.469, 671 (2007), arXiv:0705.0266 [astro-ph]

2007 arXiv
[62]

Wasserman, N

T. Wasserman, N. Sapir, P. Szabo, and E. Waxman, The Optical to X-Ray Luminosity and Spectrum of Su- pernova Wind Breakouts, Astrophys. J.993, 46 (2025), arXiv:2504.00098 [astro-ph.HE]

2025 arXiv
[63]

Caprioli and A

D. Caprioli and A. Spitkovsky, Simulations of Ion Ac- celeration at Non-relativistic Shocks. I. Acceleration Ef- ficiency, Astrophys. J.783, 91 (2014), arXiv:1310.2943 [astro-ph.HE]

2014 arXiv
[64]

Matsuoka, K

T. Matsuoka, K. Maeda, S. S. Kimura, and M. Tanaka, Systematic Investigation into Radio Supernovae with Markov Chain Monte Carlo Analysis: Implications for Massive Stars’ Mass Loss and Shock Acceleration Physics, arXiv:2505.06609 [astro-ph.HE] (2025)

2025 arXiv
[65]

A. M. Soderberget al., The Radio and X-Ray-Luminous Type Ibc Supernova 2003L, Astrophys. J.621, 908 (2005), arXiv:astro-ph/0410163 [astro-ph]

2005 arXiv
[66]

R. A. Chevalier, C. Fransson, and T. K. Nymark, Radio and X-Ray Emission as Probes of Type IIP Supernovae and Red Supergiant Mass Loss, Astrophys. J.641, 1029 (2006), arXiv:astro-ph/0509468 [astro-ph]

2006 arXiv
[67]

A. M. Soderberget al., Radio and X-ray Observations of the Type Ic SN 2007gr Reveal an Ordinary, Non- relativistic Explosion, Astrophys. J.725, 922 (2010), arXiv:1005.1932 [astro-ph.CO]

2010 arXiv
[68]

Diesing and D

R. Diesing and D. Caprioli, Spectrum of Electrons Ac- celerated in Supernova Remnants, Phys. Rev. Lett.123, 071101 (2019), arXiv:1905.07414 [astro-ph.HE]

2019 arXiv
[69]

T. J. Moriya, K. Maeda, F. Taddia, J. Sollerman, S. I. Blinnikov, and E. I. Sorokina, An analytic bolometric light curve model of interaction-powered supernovae and its application to Type IIn supernovae, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.435, 1520 (2013), arXiv:1307.2644 [astro- ph.HE]

2013 arXiv
[70]

Mihalas,Stellar Atmospheres(W

D. Mihalas,Stellar Atmospheres(W. H. Freeman, San Francisco, 1970)

1970
[71]

Tamborraet al., Neutrino emission characteristics and detection opportunities based on three-dimensional su- pernova simulations, Phys

I. Tamborraet al., Neutrino emission characteristics and detection opportunities based on three-dimensional su- pernova simulations, Phys. Rev. D90, 045032 (2014), arXiv:1406.0006 [astro-ph.SR]

2014 arXiv
[72]

Fransson, Comptonization and UV emission lines from type II supernovae., Astron

C. Fransson, Comptonization and UV emission lines from type II supernovae., Astron. Astrophys.133, 264 (1984)

1984
[73]

Bj¨ ornsson and C

C.-I. Bj¨ ornsson and C. Fransson, The X-Ray and Radio Emission from SN 2002ap: The Importance of Compton Scattering, Astrophys. J.605, 823 (2004), arXiv:astro- ph/0401196 [astro-ph]

2004
[74]

T. K. Nymark, C. Fransson, and C. Kozma, X-ray emis- sion from radiative shocks in type II supernovae, As- tron. Astrophys.449, 171 (2006), arXiv:astro-ph/0510792 [astro-ph]

2006 arXiv
[75]

R. A. Chevalier and C. M. Irwin, X-Rays from Supernova Shocks in Dense Mass Loss, Astrophys. J. Lett.747, L17 (2012), arXiv:1201.5581 [astro-ph.HE]

2012 arXiv
[76]

Margalit, E

B. Margalit, E. Quataert, and A. Y. Q. Ho, Optical to X-Ray Signatures of Dense Circumstellar Interaction in Core-collapse Supernovae, Astrophys. J.928, 122 (2022), arXiv:2109.09746 [astro-ph.HE]

2022 arXiv
[77]

F. H. Shu,The Physics of Astrophysics. Volume II: Gas Dynamics, A Series of Books in Astronomy (University Science Books, Mill Valley, CA, 1992)

1992
[78]

G. B. Rybicki and A. P. Lightman,Radiative Processes in Astrophysics(John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1986)

1986
[79]

C. L. Sarazin, X-ray emission from clusters of galaxies, Rev. Mod. Phys.58, 1 (1986)

1986
[80]

A. Y. Q. Hoet al., Luminous Millimeter, Radio, and X- Ray Emission from ZTF 20acigmel (AT 2020xnd), Astro- phys. J.932, 116 (2022), arXiv:2110.05490 [astro-ph.HE]

2022 arXiv
[81]

R. Sari, T. Piran, and R. Narayan, Spectra and Light Curves of Gamma-Ray Burst Afterglows, Astrophys. J. Lett.497, L17 (1998), arXiv:astro-ph/9712005 [astro-ph]

1998 arXiv
[82]

Granot and R

J. Granot and R. Sari, The Shape of Spectral Breaks in Gamma-Ray Burst Afterglows, Astrophys. J.568, 820 (2002), arXiv:astro-ph/0108027 [astro-ph]

2002 arXiv
[83]

Panagia and M

N. Panagia and M. Felli, The spectrum of the free-free radiation from extended envelopes., Astron. Astrophys. 39, 1 (1975)

1975
[84]

Spyromilio, Clumping and large-scale anisotropy in supernova 1993J., Mon

J. Spyromilio, Clumping and large-scale anisotropy in supernova 1993J., Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.266, L61 (1994)

1994
[85]

S. R. Trammell, D. C. Hines, and J. C. Wheeler, Spec- tropolarimetry of SN 1993J in NGC 3031, Astrophys. J. Lett.414, L21 (1993)

1993
[86]

H. D. Tranet al., Probing the Geometry and Circumstellar Environment of SN 1993J in M81, Publ. Astron. Soc. Pac. 109, 489 (1997), arXiv:astro-ph/9703134 [astro-ph]

1997 arXiv
[87]

J. M. Marcaideet al., Discovery of shell-like radio- structure in SN1993J, Nature (London)373, 44 (1995)

1995
[88]

J. R. Farahet al., The First 4 Years of SN 1993J Revis- ited: Geometric m-ring Modeling of the Radio Shell with Closure Quantities Only, arXiv:2509.20601 [astro-ph.HE] (2025)

2025
[89]

Smithet al., High-resolution Spectroscopy of SN 2023ixf’s First Week: Engulfing the Asymmetric Cir- cumstellar Material, Astrophys

N. Smithet al., High-resolution Spectroscopy of SN 2023ixf’s First Week: Engulfing the Asymmetric Cir- cumstellar Material, Astrophys. J.956, 46 (2023), arXiv:2306.07964 [astro-ph.HE]

2023 arXiv
[90]

Singhet al., Unravelling the Asphericities in the Explo- sion and Multifaceted Circumstellar Matter of SN 2023ixf, Astrophys

A. Singhet al., Unravelling the Asphericities in the Explo- sion and Multifaceted Circumstellar Matter of SN 2023ixf, Astrophys. J.975, 132 (2024), arXiv:2405.20989 [astro- ph.HE]

2024 arXiv
[91]

Murase and K

K. Murase and K. Ioka, TeV-PeV Neutrinos from Low- Power Gamma-Ray Burst Jets inside Stars, Phys. Rev. Lett.111, 121102 (2013), arXiv:1306.2274 [astro-ph.HE]

2013 arXiv
[92]

Ai and I

S. Ai and I. Tamborra, Magnetized shocks mediated by radiation from leptonic and hadronic processes, Phys. Rev. D113, 083049 (2026), arXiv:2512.00155 [astro-ph.HE]

2026 arXiv
[93]

Budnik, B

R. Budnik, B. Katz, A. Sagiv, and E. Waxman, Relativis- tic Radiation Mediated Shocks, Astrophys. J.725, 63 (2010), arXiv:1005.0141 [astro-ph.HE]

2010 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 16, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [13]

J. M. Blondin, P. Lundqvist, and R. A. Chevalier, Axisym- metric Circumstellar Interaction in Supernovae, Astro- phys. J.472, 257 (1996), arXiv:astro-ph/9601137 [astro- ph]

work page Pith review arXiv 1996

[2] [57]

Supernova ejecta interacting with a circumstellar disk. I. two-dimensional radiation-hydrodynamic simulations

A. Suzuki, T. J. Moriya, and T. Takiwaki, Supernova Ejecta Interacting with a Circumstellar Disk. I. Two- dimensional Radiation-hydrodynamic Simulations, Astro- phys. J.887, 249 (2019), arXiv:1911.09261 [astro-ph.HE]

work page Pith review arXiv 2019

[3] [42]

Fransson, P

C. Fransson, P. Lundqvist, and R. A. Chevalier, Circum- stellar Interaction in SN 1993J, Astrophys. J.461, 993 (1996)

work page 1996

[4] [49]

A. J. Nayanaet al., Dinosaur in a Haystack: X-Ray View of the Entrails of SN 2023ixf and the Radio Afterglow of Its Interaction with the Medium Spawned by the Pro- genitor Star (Paper I), Astrophys. J.985, 51 (2025), arXiv:2411.02647 [astro-ph.HE]

arXiv 2025

[5] [1]

Smith, Mass Loss: Its Effect on the Evolution and Fate of High-Mass Stars, Ann

N. Smith, Mass Loss: Its Effect on the Evolution and Fate of High-Mass Stars, Ann. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 52, 487 (2014), arXiv:1402.1237 [astro-ph.SR]

arXiv 2014

[6] [2]

R. A. Chevalier and C. Fransson, Thermal and Non- thermal Emission from Circumstellar Interaction, inHand- book of Supernovae, edited by A. W. Alsabti and P. Mur- din (2017) p. 875

2017

[7] [3]

Chandra, Circumstellar Interaction in Supernovae in Dense Environments—An Observational Perspective, Space

P. Chandra, Circumstellar Interaction in Supernovae in Dense Environments—An Observational Perspective, Space. Sci. Rev.214, 27 (2018), arXiv:1712.07405 [astro- ph.HE]

arXiv 2018

[8] [4]

Marguttiet al., A Panchromatic View of the Rest- less SN 2009ip Reveals the Explosive Ejection of a Massive Star Envelope, Astrophys

R. Marguttiet al., A Panchromatic View of the Rest- less SN 2009ip Reveals the Explosive Ejection of a Massive Star Envelope, Astrophys. J.780, 21 (2014), arXiv:1306.0038 [astro-ph.HE]

arXiv 2014