Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 34 references

Uniqueness of gluings and virtual finiteness of pseudo-Anosov flows on graph manifolds

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Two pseudo-Anosov flows on the same toroidal 3-manifold are orbit equivalent exactly when their complete bar codes agree, and this yields virtual finiteness of transitive pseudo-Anosov flows on graph manifolds.

desk verdict Strong paper with a real gap: the main finiteness theorem depends on a lemma deferred to an unpublished companion paper. read the letter →

arxiv 2608.13526 v1 pith:CWFWPCFK submitted 2026-08-13 math.DS

Thomas Barthelmé , Neige Paulet This is my paper · ORCID
classification math.DS MSC 37D2057K30
keywords pseudo-AnosovflowsgraphmanifoldsorbitequivalencegluingbarcodefreehomotopydataJSJdecompositionvirtualfiniteness
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper answers the long-open gluing question for pseudo-Anosov flows: if two flows are built from the same pieces along tori, they are orbit equivalent precisely when a finite combinatorial invariant, the complete bar code, matches. It then uses this uniqueness result to prove a virtual version of the Finiteness Conjecture: on any graph manifold, any family of transitive pseudo-Anosov flows becomes finite up to orbit equivalence after lifting to one finite cover whose degree depends only on the topology of the manifold. This matters because the full Finiteness Conjecture remains open, and the result reduces a dynamical classification problem to finite combinatorial data attached to the JSJ decomposition.

What carries the argument

The complete bar code of a pseudo-Anosov triple $(P,\varphi,f)$ is a finite combinatorial datum: on each parallel boundary torus it records the cyclic sequence of compact leaves of the boundary foliation, labeled stable, unstable, marked, or tangent, together with a shift locating the image of the gluing foliation. It extends the bar code of the boundary prefoliation, which is intrinsic to the piece, by including extra compact leaves created by the gluing; this is exactly the data needed to compare the traces of the stable and unstable foliations on the gluing tori. In the orbit space, a quasi-transverse torus becomes a chain of lozenges, and the partial order $\prec$ between maximal lines of lozenges detects which orbit segments can travel from one boundary lift to another; preserving $\prec$ is the condition that yields equality of free homotopy data and, for transitive flows, orbit equivalence.

What would settle it

Build a graph manifold $M$ and a family of transitive pseudo-Anosov flows such that, for every finite cover of $M$, the lifted flows represent infinitely many orbit-equivalence classes; Theorem B would be false. A cheaper target is to exhibit a non-skew Anosov flow obtained by gluing two skew pieces along quasi-transverse tori, which would falsify Lemma 7.5 and with it the mixed-manifold theorem.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is that gluing ambiguity is fully controlled by the boundary combinatorics of the stable and unstable foliations. For two transitive pseudo-Anosov flows on an orientable toroidal 3-manifold that already agree piecewise on a JSJ-like decomposition, the flows are orbit equivalent if and only if their complete bar codes agree. The complete bar code records, on each gluing torus, the cyclic order of compact leaves of the stable and unstable traces together with the periodic orbits where the foliations are tangent, up to a choice of first leaf. In the universal cover this data becomes a partial order on maximal lines of lozenges in the orbit space; preserving that order preserves free homotopy data, and for transitive flows free homotopy data determine orbit equivalence. Iterating the finiteness of bar codes in each equivalence class of a pseudo-Anosov triple over the finitely many JSJ pieces yields the virtual finiteness theorem.

Load-bearing premise

The proof of the mixed-manifold extension relies on an unpublished claim that gluing skew pieces always gives a skew flow, and if that claim fails the finiteness theorems no longer follow.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If two transitive pseudo-Anosov flows on a toroidal manifold agree on each JSJ piece, then checking a finite combinatorial invariant, the complete bar code, decides global orbit equivalence.
  • On a fixed graph manifold, every family of transitive pseudo-Anosov flows has at most $n$ orbit-equivalence classes after lifting to one finite cover whose degree depends only on the manifold.
  • For a fixed manifold, there are finitely many free homotopy data among flows built from equivalent pseudo-Anosov triples whose gluing returns that manifold.
  • A Dehn twist along a quasi-transverse torus in the direction of a compact leaf is a self-orbit equivalence of a transitive pseudo-Anosov flow.
  • The finiteness result extends to manifolds with mixed JSJ decomposition provided the flow is skew on each hyperbolic piece, and under orientability plus embedded-torus hypotheses the finite cover is unnecessary.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The complete bar code together with the order $\prec$ could yield an algorithmic recognition procedure for orbit equivalence, since both objects are finite and the order has a dynamical reformulation in terms of existence of orbit segments.
  • If the unpublished skew-gluing lemma used for mixed manifolds is established independently, the remaining finiteness argument is topological, suggesting virtual finiteness may hold for all toroidal 3-manifolds without the skewness hypothesis.
  • The proof structure indicates that the same finiteness should hold for non-transitive families if the conclusion is phrased in terms of free homotopy data rather than orbit equivalence; the transitive hypothesis is used only to convert equal free homotopy data into orbit equivalence.
  • A positive answer to the paper's Question 3 would upgrade the finite-cover statement to genuine finiteness of pseudo-Anosov flows on graph manifolds.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper studies pseudo-Anosov flows on 3-manifolds obtained by gluing flow pieces along tori. It introduces a finite combinatorial invariant, the complete bar code, encoding the traces of the stable and unstable foliations on the cutting tori. The main theorems assert that equivalent gluing triples with the same complete bar code induce flows with equivalent free homotopy data, and orbit-equivalent flows when transitivity is assumed (Theorems C and A); that only finitely many complete bar codes occur in an equivalence class (Proposition D); and a virtual finiteness statement for transitive pseudo-Anosov flows on graph manifolds (Theorem B), deduced from the more general Theorem 7.2 / Theorem F. The arguments use the orbit-space machinery of Barbot and Fenley and earlier work of the same authors, with a final step that depends on a lemma whose proof is deferred to an unpublished reference.

Significance. If the deferred lemma is supplied, the paper would constitute a substantial advance: a general gluing-uniqueness criterion and a virtual resolution of a case of the Finiteness Conjecture for graph manifolds, a problem on Kirby's list. The complete bar code is a concrete and well-motivated finite invariant, and Theorem E provides a reusable criterion for equality of free homotopy data. The paper is carefully organized and credits prior work appropriately. Its main weakness is that the finiteness theorems rest on an unpublished lemma (Lemma 7.5), so the central claim is not yet self-contained; there are also two further technical points that need repair or fuller proof.

major comments (3)
  1. [§7.1, Lemma 7.5] Lemma 7.5 is load-bearing for the virtual finiteness theorem: it asserts that a pseudo-Anosov piece obtained by gluing skew pieces is itself skew. The proof states that 'the fact that the Anosov flow φ′ on M′ is skew is proved in [BLMP]' and then gives a sketch whose starting point — that each vertex group π1(Q_j) preserves an axis A_j in the stable leaf space of φ′ — is exactly the content of [BLMP], not a consequence of the published [Pau25] or [Mar25]. Proposition 7.7 needs Lemma 7.5 to classify the non-periodic pieces as skew and then apply [Mar25, Corollary C], so Theorems 7.2, F, G, and B are conditional on unpublished work. The authors should either include a complete proof of Lemma 7.5 in this paper or restate the finiteness theorems as conditional on the appearance of [BLMP]; as it stands, the finiteness claim is not self-contained.
  2. [§2.5, Lemma 2.19] Lemma 2.19 is used to prove Proposition 2.17, which supplies the finite cover with embedded modified JSJ tori in Theorem 7.2. The proof has two gaps. In Step 3, the word β obtained from a subarc of c is asserted to lie in the forbidden set F, but membership in F requires β to be a reduced word in distinct letters β_i; the text does not justify that a subarc of a simple closed curve whose retraction is non-simple cannot repeat a letter. In Step 4, the claim that taking successive finite covers for different fatgraphs does not introduce new self-intersections is asserted without proof. Since Proposition 2.17 is needed for the finite-cover passage, this lemma needs a complete proof or a precise reference.
  3. [§6, Theorem A] Theorem A is advertised in the introduction as the characterization theorem, but neither Section 6 nor Section 7 contains an explicit proof of it. Theorem C supplies the 'if' direction for equivalent triples with the same complete bar code (and hence, after cutting along the tori, for the flows in Theorem A). The converse — that an orbit equivalence between φ1 and φ2 forces the corresponding triples to have the same complete bar code — is not proved or cited. This is the uniqueness half of the paper's main statement and should be proved explicitly, or the statement should be amended to a one-way implication if the converse is intended to be immediate from the definitions.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Definitions 4.20 and 4.28] The phrase 'same complete bar code' for two flows in Theorem A is not formally defined; it is defined only for pseudo-Anosov triples. Please spell out how the definition is transferred to flows via the modified JSJ decomposition.
  2. [§6, Proposition D] The proof of Proposition D leaves several claims unproved, in particular that the projection of a stable cylinder to the base surface is an embedded arc crossing at most one vertex of the fatgraph, and that the isotopy class of these projected arcs is fixed. Since Corollary 6.11 depends on Proposition D, this part should be expanded.
  3. [§2.2, Proposition 2.7] There is a typo in the proof: 'an-Dehn twist' should be 'a Dehn twist'.
  4. [References] The reference [BLMP] is listed as 'in preparation'. If Lemma 7.5 remains deferred, the paper should state explicitly which results are conditional on this unpublished work, preferably in the introduction.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 6.0 of 10

Virtual finiteness is conditional on Lemma 7.5, whose key skewness assertion is deferred to the same-authors unpublished [BLMP]; the sketched axis argument does not supply the missing proof.

  1. self citation load bearing [Section 7.1, proof of Lemma 7.5]
    "The fact that the Anosov flow φ′ on M′ is skew is proved in [BLMP], for completeness, we sketch the argument, which is only a very slight modification of the proof of Theorem 5.3.2 of [BM25]: ... Then each π1(Qj)... preserves an axis Ai ≃ R in the, say stable, leaf space Λ(Qs) of φ′. (This axis comes from the semi-conjugacy between φ′|Qj and a piece of a skew flow.)"

    [BLMP] is an unpublished work 'in preparation' by the same authors (Barthelmé and Paulet are authors of the present paper). The assertion that the glued Anosov flow on the double is skew is exactly the missing premise needed for Proposition 7.7 to apply Marty's finite classification of skew Anosov flows. The proof sketch does not establish the axis: the existence of the axis from a semi-conjugacy with a skew flow is precisely the content deferred to [BLMP]. Thus the virtual-finiteness theorems (7.2, F, B) are conditional on an unverified self-citation rather than on an argument contained in this paper. This is load-bearing, though not an equation-level equivalence; the core uniqueness results (Theorems A, C, E) are self-contained.

full rationale

The paper's main uniqueness mechanism, Theorem E and the complete-bar-code comparison of Theorem C, is developed internally from traces of stable and unstable foliations on quasi-transverse tori; no fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction and no theorem assumes its own conclusion in the derivation of Theorems A and C. The genuine weakness is isolated in the finiteness part: Lemma 7.5 asserts that a piece obtained by gluing skew pieces is skew, and the proof defers the central skewness statement to [BLMP], an unpublished companion by overlapping authors. The sketch that follows assumes each vertex group preserves an axis in the stable leaf space, which is exactly the content of [BLMP]. Since Proposition 7.7, and hence Theorems 7.2, F, G and B, depend on Lemma 7.5, the virtual finiteness claim rests on a load-bearing self-citation that is not yet independently available. This is a genuine completeness gap rather than a circular reduction of equations, so the score is moderate rather than maximal.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 1 invented entities

No numerical free parameters appear in this paper. The central claims rest on established orbit-space and JSJ theory, on deep external classification theorems (some by the same authors), and on one deferred unpublished lemma about gluing skew pieces.

assumptions (6)
  • standard math Orbit space theory: the quotient of the universal cover by the flow is a topological plane with stable and unstable foliations, including lozenge and perfect fit machinery.
    Used throughout Sections 2 and 5; the authors cite [BM25] and [Bar95a, Fen94] as the background framework.
  • domain assumption Barbot-Fenley classification of pseudo-Anosov flows in Seifert pieces: periodic pieces are determined by fatgraph and spine data.
    Invoked in Theorems 2.14 and 2.15 and used in the finiteness arguments for periodic Seifert pieces in Section 7.2.
  • domain assumption Two transitive pseudo-Anosov flows with equivalent free homotopy data are orbit equivalent unless a scalloped periodic Seifert piece has different signs.
    Used in Claim 6.9 to upgrade equality of free homotopy data to orbit equivalence; this is a deep external theorem from [BFM25b].
  • domain assumption There are finitely many skew Anosov flows on a fixed 3-manifold up to orbit equivalence.
    Used in Proposition 7.7 to obtain finiteness of skew pseudo-Anosov pieces; cited from [Mar25].
  • ad hoc to paper A pseudo-Anosov piece built by gluing skew pieces is itself skew (Lemma 7.5).
    The proof is deferred to the unpublished reference [BLMP], and a sketch is given. This is load-bearing for Theorems 7.2 and F.
  • standard math There are finitely many fatgraphs on a fixed surface with no valence-2 vertices, up to diffeomorphism.
    Proved as Lemma 2.18 by Euler characteristic and degree-sum arguments, and used in Lemma 2.19 and Proposition 7.8.
invented entities (1)
  • Complete bar code independent evidence
    purpose: Finite combinatorial invariant recording the relative positions and markings of compact leaves in the traces of stable and unstable foliations on the boundary tori of a pseudo-Anosov triple; used to characterize orbit equivalence of glued flows.
    It is rigorously defined in Definitions 3.15 and 4.20, and Theorems A and C establish that equivalent triples with the same complete bar code have the same free homotopy data, and orbit equivalence under transitivity. Thus it is a tested invariant with mathematical consequences, not an ad hoc postulate.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Uniqueness of gluings and virtual finiteness of pseudo-Anosov flows on graph manifolds." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/CWFWPCFK

@misc{pith2026260813526,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Uniqueness of gluings and virtual finiteness of pseudo-Anosov flows on graph manifolds},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/CWFWPCFK}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2608.13526}
}
read the original abstract

In this article, we give a characterization of when two pseudo-Anosov flows obtained via gluings of pieces of pseudo-Anosov flows are orbit equivalent. As an application of this work, and the description of pseudo-Anosov flows in Seifert pieces due to Barbot and Fenley, we prove a ``virtual'' version of the Finiteness Conjecture for transitive pseudo-Anosov flows on graph-manifolds.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2608.13526 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. A quasi-Morse-Smale foliation on the torus with dy￾namical orientation of compact leaves. Remark 3.3. A quasi-Morse-Smale lamination models the lamination obtained as the trace of the stable or unstable lamination of a piece of pseudo–Anosov flow cut along embedded quasi–transverse tori, where K is a sublamination of the stable or unstable foliation of the pseudo–Anosov flow. More precisely, in the case of an Anosov… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Bar code of a parallel quasi-transverse pair pair of quasi-Morse-Smale foliations (F+, F−) Proposition 3.17 (Realization of abstract bar code). An abstract bar code (σ : {0, . . . , n − 1} → {+, −, ∗, ∗∗}, k) is the bar code of a parallel quasi–transverse bifoliation (F +, F −) on a torus T if and only if n is even and |{σ = ∗}| is even. Proof. If σ is the bar code of a pair of quasi–transverse foliations (F +, F −)… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. A pseudo-Anosov piece (left) and associated embedded piece (right). Definition 4.11 (Pseudo-Anosov gluing map). A pseudo-Anosov gluing map of a pseudo-Anosov piece (P, φ) is a C 1 -involution f : ∂P → ∂P pairing the boundary surfaces of the formal boundary ∂P, so that the quotient P/f is a closed manifold and φ induces a flow φf on P/f which is pseudo-Anosov. We say that (P, φ, f) is a pseudo-Anosov triple. Remark 4… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (11 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Gluing construction of Example 4.23. Let (PBL, φBL) be the Bonatti–Langevin building block (see [BL94]). It has one en￾trance boundary torus T in BL and one exit boundary torus T out BL . On each of these tori, the boundary prefoliation has exactly two compact leaves w…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Bar code (top) and complete bar code (bottom). The dot marks the first compact leaf of the image lamination. In the above example, while the complete bar code differed from the bar code, the complete bar code was completely determined by the bar code together with the …
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Gluing construction of Example 4.24 We first glue T out 1 to T in 2 by a transverse map f12 : T out 1 → T in 2 which glues the two compact leaves coming from P1 inside Ain 2 . As in Example 4.23, the gluing construction of [BBY17] produces a new building block with ent…
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Comparing the two complete bar codes. The bar codes of the prefoliation are the same. The dot marks the first compact leaf of the image. of Definition 4.25, and satisfies that the orbit equivalence from Item (ii) is isotopic to the identity in P. Remark 4.27. In genera…
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Periodic boundary of a non-periodic band C in bold green. the accessible boundary of C. If C is a nonperiodic band, the periodic leaves given by the asymptotics lie in the (non-accessible) ideal boundary of C. Definition 4.37. We say that B is a maximal band if it is a…
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Action of the return map Θe on a segment σ u of Feu T in a non-periodic band (left) and in a periodic band (right). piecewise on a block decomposition and that the dynamics along the boundary tori match in the appropriate sense. The main tool is a partial order on cert…
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Decomposition of a minimal chain into maximal lines of lozenges. We now return to the good collection T of quasi-transverse tori in M, its complete lift Te in Mf, and its trace in the orbit space which is the collection of chains C := p(Te) ⊂ Qϕ. By [BM25, Proposition…
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: The four possible Markovian intersection types for lines L ≺ L′ . Here Qu is the vertical foliation and Qs is the horizontal foliation. Top left: Case 1. Bottom left: Case 2.Bottom right: Case 3. Top right: Case 4. Proposition 5.10. Let L and L ′ be two lines of lozen…
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: For n = 3 we have 3 equivalent triples with 3 distinct bar codes. of the pieces. Hence the only difference in bar codes comes from the compact leaves of the boundary foliation F∂ which do not belong to K∂. We will prove that the number of extra compact leaves is unifo…
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: Side s(c, C) (shaded) of a periodic boundary c of a component C contained in a maximal band B Let ˜ξ be the lift of ξ in Mf commuting with π1(M). It maps the periodic leaves of (Fes T ,0 , Feu T ,0 ), the trace of (Fes 0 , Feu 0 ) on Te, to periodic leaves of (Fes T ,…
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: Relations between the maximal bands, components, and periodic boundary on the collection T . The sides s(c, C) are shaded. trees of scalloped regions differ (see [BFM25b, Theorem 1.3] and [BFM25a, Theo￾rem 2.26])9 . We refer to Section 6.2 of [BFM25a] for the precise …

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

34 extracted references · 29 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Dynamics of veering triangulations: infinitesimal components of their flow graphs and applications

    Ian Agol and Chi Cheuk Tsang. Dynamics of veering triangulations: infinitesimal components of their flow graphs and applications. Algebr. Geom. Topol. , 24(6):3401--3453, 2024

    work page 2024

  2. [2]

    Characterization of Anosov flows in dimension 3 by their weak foliations

    Thierry Barbot. Characterization of Anosov flows in dimension 3 by their weak foliations . Ergodic Theory and Dynamical Systems , 15(2):247--270, 1995

    1995

  3. [3]

    Mise en position optimale de tores par rapport \`a un flot d'Anosov

    Thierry Barbot. Mise en position optimale de tores par rapport \`a un flot d'Anosov. Commentarii mathematici Helvetici , 70(1):113--160, 1995

    work page 1995

  4. [4]

    Flots d' A nosov sur les vari\'et\'es graph\'ees au sens de W aldhausen

    Thierry Barbot. Flots d' A nosov sur les vari\'et\'es graph\'ees au sens de W aldhausen. Ann. Inst. Fourier (Grenoble) , 46(5):1451--1517, 1996

    work page 1996

  5. [5]

    Building Anosov flows on 3- Manifolds

    Fran c ois B \'e guin, Christian Bonatti, and Bin Yu. Building Anosov flows on 3- Manifolds . Geometry & Topology , 21(3):1837--1930, 2017

    work page 1930

  6. [6]

    Thierry Barbot and S \'e rgio R. Fenley. Pseudo- Anosov flows in toroidal manifolds. Geometry & Topology , 17(4):1877--1954, July 2013

    work page 1954

  7. [7]

    Thierry Barbot and S \'e rgio R. Fenley. Classification and rigidity of totally periodic pseudo- Anosov flows in graph manifolds. Ergodic Theory and Dynamical Systems , 35(6):1681--1722, 2015

    work page 2015

  8. [8]

    Free Seifert pieces of pseudo- Anosov flows

    Thierry Barbot and S \'e rgio R Fenley. Free Seifert pieces of pseudo- Anosov flows. Geometry & Topology , 25(3):1331--1440, May 2021

    work page 2021

Show all 34 references
  1. [9]

    Anosov flows with the same periodic orbits

    Thomas Barthelm\'e, Sergio Fenley, and Kathryn Mann. Anosov flows with the same periodic orbits. J. Mod. Dyn. , 21:361--400, 2025

    2025

  2. [10]

    Orbit equivalences of pseudo- A nosov flows

    Thomas Barthelm\'e, Steven Frankel, and Kathryn Mann. Orbit equivalences of pseudo- A nosov flows. Invent. Math. , 240(3):1119--1192, 2025

    2025

  3. [11]

    Fenley, and Rafael Potrie

    Thomas Barthelm\'e, Sergio R. Fenley, and Rafael Potrie. Collapsed A nosov flows and self orbit equivalences. Comment. Math. Helv. , 98(4):771--875, 2023

    2023

  4. [12]

    Un exemple de flot d' Anosov transitif transverse \`a un tore et non conjugu \'e \`a une suspension

    Christian Bonatti and R \'e mi Langevin. Un exemple de flot d' Anosov transitif transverse \`a un tore et non conjugu \'e \`a une suspension. Ergodic Theory and Dynamical Systems , 14(4):633--643, 1994

    1994

  5. [13]

    Skew pieces in pseudo- Anosov flows

    Thomas Barthelmé, Lingfeng Lu, Kathryn Mann, and Neige Paulet. Skew pieces in pseudo- Anosov flows. In preparation

  6. [14]

    Orbit equivalences of R -covered A nosov flows and hyperbolic-like actions on the line

    Thomas Barthelm\'e and Kathryn Mann. Orbit equivalences of R -covered A nosov flows and hyperbolic-like actions on the line. Geom. Topol. , 28(2):867--899, 2024. Appendix written jointly with Jonathan Bowden

    2024

  7. [15]

    Pseudo- Anosov Flows : A Plane Approach , 2025

    Thomas Barthelmé and Kathryn Mann. Pseudo- Anosov Flows : A Plane Approach , 2025. arxiv:2509.15375 http://arxiv.org/abs/2509.15375

    2025

  8. [16]

    Baldwin, Steven Sivek, and Jonathan Zung

    John A. Baldwin, Steven Sivek, and Jonathan Zung. Pseudo- A nosov flows on hyperbolic L -spaces, 2025. arxiv:2505.21113 https://arxiv.org/abs/2505.21113

    2025 arXiv

  9. [17]

    Finiteness of pseudo- A nosov flows without perfect fits, 2026

    Thomas Barthelmé, Chi Cheuk Tsang, and Jonathan Zung. Finiteness of pseudo- A nosov flows without perfect fits, 2026. arxiv:2607.10398 https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.10398

    2026 arXiv

  10. [18]

    A uniqueness theorem for transitive Anosov flows obtained by gluing hyperbolic plugs

    Fran c ois B \'e guin and Bin Yu. A uniqueness theorem for transitive Anosov flows obtained by gluing hyperbolic plugs. Algebraic & Geometric Topology , 23(6):2673--2713, September 2023

    2023

  11. [19]

    Pseudo- A nosov R eeb flows and contact structures, 2026

    Julian Chaidez and Yijie Pan. Pseudo- A nosov R eeb flows and contact structures, 2026. arxiv:2512.12698 https://arxiv.org/abs/2512.12698

    2026

  12. [20]

    S \'e rgio R. Fenley. Anosov flows in 3-manifolds. Annals of Mathematics. Second Series , 139(1):79--115, 1994

    1994

  13. [21]

    Hyperbolic flows

    Todd Fisher and Boris Hasselblatt. Hyperbolic flows . Zurich Lectures in Advanced Mathematics. EMS Publishing House, Berlin, 2019

    2019

  14. [22]

    On distinct finite covers of 3-manifolds

    Stefan Friedl, Junghwan Park, Bram Petri, Jean Raimbault, and Arunima Ray. On distinct finite covers of 3-manifolds. Indiana University Mathematics Journal , 70(2):809–846, 2021

    2021

  15. [23]

    Notes on Basic 3- Manifold Topology

    Allen Hatcher. Notes on Basic 3- Manifold Topology . Available at https://pi.math.cornell.edu/ hatcher/3M/3M.pdf

  16. [24]

    Introduction to the Geometry of Foliations, Part A: Foliations on Compact Surfaces, Fundamentals for Arbitrary Codimension, and Holonomy

    Gilbert Hector and Ulrich Hirsch. Introduction to the Geometry of Foliations, Part A: Foliations on Compact Surfaces, Fundamentals for Arbitrary Codimension, and Holonomy . Aspects of Mathematics / Aspekte der Mathematik . Vieweg+Teubner Verlag, Wiesbaden, 1981

    1981

  17. [25]

    R. \. I nan c Baykur, Robion C. Kirby, and Daniel Ruberman, editors. K3---a new problem list in low-dimensional topology , volume 295 of Mathematical Surveys and Monographs . American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, [2026] 2026

    2026

  18. [26]

    William H. Jaco. Lectures on Three-Manifold Topology . Number 43 in Regional Conference Series in Mathematics . Published for the Conference Board of the Mathematical Sciences by the American Mathematical Society, 1997

    1997

  19. [27]

    Homotopy Equivalences of 3-Manifolds with Boundaries , volume 761 of Lect

    Klaus Johannson. Homotopy Equivalences of 3-Manifolds with Boundaries , volume 761 of Lect. Notes Math . Springer, Cham, 1979

    1979

  20. [28]

    William Jaco and Peter B. Shalen. Seifert fibered spaces in 3 -manifolds. In Geometric topology ( P roc. G eorgia T opology C onf., A thens, G a., 1977) , pages 91--99. Academic Press, New York-London, 1979

    1977

  21. [29]

    Landry and Samuel J

    Michael P. Landry and Samuel J. Taylor. The transverse finiteness conjecture for pseudo- A nosov flows. In preparation

  22. [30]

    Skewed Anosov flows are orbit equivalent to Reeb-Anosov flows in dimension 3

    Th \'e o Marty. Skewed Anosov flows are orbit equivalent to Reeb-Anosov flows in dimension 3. J. Eur. Math. Soc. , 2025. Published online first, DOI 10.4171/JEMS/1619 https://ems.press/journals/jems/articles/14298675

    2025

  23. [31]

    Homeomorphisms which are Dehn twists on the boundary

    Darryl McCullough. Homeomorphisms which are Dehn twists on the boundary. Algebr. Geom. Topol. , 6(3):1331--1340, 2006

    2006

  24. [32]

    Anosov flows in dimension 3 from gluing building blocks with quasi-transverse boundary

    Neige Paulet. Anosov flows in dimension 3 from gluing building blocks with quasi-transverse boundary. Journal of Modern Dynamics , 21(0):21--240, February 2025

    2025

  25. [33]

    Hyperbolic models of transitive topologically A nosov flows in dimension three

    Mario Shannon. Hyperbolic models of transitive topologically A nosov flows in dimension three. Ann. Sci. \'Ec. Norm. Sup\'er. (4) , 58(5):1243--1318, 2025

    2025

  26. [34]

    Stallings

    John R. Stallings. Topology of finite graphs. Inventiones Mathematicae , 71:551--565, 1983

    1983

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.