Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 55 references

Topological photonic crystal fibers and ring resonators

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Pith's one-line read A Harper-modulated fiber cladding supports topologically protected edge states at the core boundary, localizing light in a protected radial ring.

desk verdict A coherent theory proposal that maps AAH synthetic dimensions onto cylindrical claddings and finds topological edge states, but the robustness claim outruns the evidence and the asymptotic proof needs tightening. read the letter →

arxiv 1909.02081 v1 pith:26Q3TAWU submitted 2019-09-04 physics.optics

classification physics.optics
keywords topologicalphotonicsphotoniccrystalfibersAubry-Andre-HarpermodulationsyntheticdimensionsedgestatesringresonatorsChernnumbersprotection
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper introduces a design for optical fibers and ring resonators in which the cladding layers are positioned by an Aubry-Andre-Harper modulation rather than by a uniform period. It claims that this modulation opens nontrivial gaps in the radial band structure and turns the core-cladding interface into a boundary between a trivial core and a topological cladding, so the structure supports edge states with nonzero winding number. The authors compute the complex mode spectrum with an exact recursive reflection-matrix method and show that the edge modes are strongly localized at a chosen radial distance and are nearly unaffected by randomized disorder in layer positions. If the claim holds, these fibers would guide and trap light in modes that are intrinsically protected against symmetry-preserving local perturbations such as disorder and bending, something conventional total-internal-reflection and Bragg fibers do not provide.

What carries the argument

The central object is the Aubry-Andre-Harper modulated cylindrical multilayer, whose layer positions are $\rho_n^A = d_o[n + \eta \cos(2\pi\gamma n + \phi)]$; the phase $\phi$ is a synthetic dimension whose cyclic variation produces the gap winding numbers. The argument is carried by the exact recursive generalized reflection-matrix formalism: starting from the outermost layer, the recurrence builds the interface reflectivity $\tilde R_{1,2}$, and modes are found from $\det(I - R_{2,1}\tilde R_{2,3})=0$ with complex frequencies accounting for leakage. In the asymptotic cladding limit the transfer matrix reduces to that of a planar Harper multilayer, so gaps are located from the half-trace of the single-period transfer matrix and the winding numbers of the reflection coefficient label the gaps as trivial or nontrivial.

What would settle it

Compute the exact mode spectrum $f(\omega,\beta)=0$ from the recursive reflection matrices without replacing the cladding by the planar asymptotic transfer matrix, for a fiber with $\rho_1=2d_o$ and 13 Aubry-Andre-Harper periods, and check that a mode with $\mathrm{Im}\,\omega \approx 10^{-2}\,\mathrm{Re}\,\omega$ appears inside each gap whose reflection-coefficient winding number is nonzero; if no such mode appears, or if the gap closes at smaller radii, the planar-to-cylindrical correspondence fails. An experimental falsifier is to fabricate the multilayer fiber and measure the near-field profile: the predicted strong peak at the core-cladding interface and its insensitivity to layer disorder would be absent if the topological label is wrong.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that a cylindrical multilayer can be made topological purely through its cladding. Each high-index layer is placed at $\rho_n^A = d_o[n + \eta \cos(2\pi\gamma n + \phi)]$ with $\gamma=p/q$, and the phase $\phi$ acts as a synthetic momentum along a second dimension, giving the one-dimensional radial modulation the same gap structure as a two-dimensional ancestor lattice. Solving the full cylindrical Maxwell problem by transfer and generalized reflection matrices, the authors find gaps in the reflectivity, compute the winding numbers of the reflection coefficient as $\phi$ traverses $(-\pi,\pi)$, and identify gaps with nonzero winding number as topologically nontrivial. The guidance condition $\det(I - R_{2,1}\tilde R_{2,3})=0$ then yields edge-state dispersions that bridge these gaps, and the corresponding fields are localized at the core-cladding interface. The mode frequencies are shown to be stable against random disorder in the layer positions up to $\sigma \simeq 0.5$, which the paper reads as evidence of topological protection.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that beyond some radius $\rho_n$ the cylindrical geometry's curvature can be neglected, so the actual fiber's gaps and topological labels are those of a planar multilayer with the same Harper modulation; the finite-core calculations rely on this convergence at core radius $\rho_1=2d_o$ and a 13-period cladding.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • A real fiber with a finite cladding of 13 Aubry-Andre-Harper unit cells already reproduces the asymptotic gap structure, so the topological edge modes are within reach of fabrication.
  • Because protection only requires symmetry-preserving perturbations that do not close the gap, layer-position disorder with $\sigma \simeq 0.5$ leaves the edge-mode frequency nearly unchanged.
  • Edge modes are localized at the core-cladding interface rather than in the core, giving strong radial energy concentration at a designable radius.
  • The same recursive method gives complex resonance frequencies for ring resonators, so the design transfers directly from guiding fibers to trapping cavities.
  • The synthetic phase $\phi$ continuously tunes the edge-state dispersion, offering a control knob for dispersion engineering.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the planar-to-cylindrical convergence survives at smaller core radii, hollow-core versions could combine topological protection with low-index guidance, a combination the paper does not explicitly develop.
  • Adding gain to the cladding layers could turn the protected edge mode into a topological fiber laser with threshold set by the small mode volume rather than by surface loss; this is an extrapolation, not a claim of the paper.
  • The same Aubry-Andre-Harper cladding recipe in elliptical or deformed cross-sections would presumably create protected whispering-gallery-like modes with nonzero angular momentum, which the paper lists as future work.
  • A direct experimental signature would be a transmission dip or resonant peak whose frequency tracks the phase $\phi$ and whose near-field profile peaks at the core boundary, insensitive to random layer disorder.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. This paper proposes photonic crystal fibers and ring resonators with a cylindrical cladding formed by annular layers whose positions follow an Aubry-Andre-Harper (AAH) modulation. The authors develop a recursive transfer-matrix formalism for the exact cylindrical geometry and compute reflectivity maps, field profiles, and mode dispersions. They identify two nontrivial gaps by the winding number of the reflection coefficient computed in a planar asymptotic limit, and they show edge states localized at the core-cladding interface for a finite core radius rho_1 = 2 d_o. They also test robustness against two realizations of positional disorder.

Significance. If the asymptotic equivalence between the cylindrical cladding and the planar Harper structure can be made quantitative, the proposal is original and significant: it transfers synthetic-dimension topological physics to cylindrical fibers and resonators, with potential for robust guiding and trapping. Strengths include the exact recursive treatment of the cylindrical geometry, the direct computation of edge-state field profiles, and the fact that the central results are computed from the model rather than fitted. However, the topological classification and the disorder-robustness claim are currently supported only in the planar limit and by a minimal disorder test, respectively.

major comments (3)
  1. [Appendix C and Figs. 2-4] The winding numbers that label the two lower gaps as nontrivial are obtained from the planar asymptotic transfer matrices in Eqs. (C9) and (C10), not from the exact cylindrical reflection matrix R_{1,2} of Eq. (8). Appendix C asserts that a radius rho_n exists beyond which the cylindrical gaps converge to the planar ones, but it provides no estimate for rho_n and no evidence that the chosen core radius rho_1 = 2 d_o is in the convergent regime. Because the edge mode shown in Fig. 4 is localized at the core-cladding interface, where the curvature corrections F^< in Eq. (C7) are largest, the planar limit is least reliable precisely where the claimed protected mode resides. Please compute the winding number directly from R_{1,2} for the finite cylindrical structure, or provide a quantitative convergence test showing that the gap labels are unchanged at rho_1 = 2 d_o.
  2. [Fig. 3d] The disorder-robustness evidence consists of two realizations of random position disorder, with no ensemble statistics, no verification that the bandgap remains open under the disordered realizations, and no comparison with a topologically trivial control structure. The frequency shifts in Fig. 3d are attributed to changes in the lattice pitch, which is a global effect rather than evidence of topological immunity. Please provide an ensemble average, a disordered bulk-gap calculation, and a trivial-cladding control.
  3. [Abstract and §2] The claim of robustness against symmetry-preserving local perturbations that do not close the gap is not demonstrated: the random position disorder in Fig. 3d is not shown to preserve the relevant symmetry, and no perturbation is identified that leaves the gap open. This claim should either be supported by additional simulations or explicitly qualified.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Appendix A, Eq. (A9)] In Eq. (A9), the notation J^(1)_l appears; this should be the Bessel function J_l, not a Hankel function of the first kind.
  2. [Appendix A, Eq. (A12)] The matrix M defined below Eq. (A12) has determinant -1, not 1 as stated.
  3. [Fig. 3 caption] Please correct 'unitary cells' to 'unit cells' and 'orange(blu)' to 'orange (blue)'.
  4. [Throughout] Please use the accented spelling 'Aubry-Andre-Harper' consistently as 'Aubry-André-Harper'.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the topological invariants and edge states are computed from the model's own equations, with no fitted target or self-citation chain.

full rationale

The paper's central claims are derived from a self-contained recursive transfer-matrix formalism. Guided modes and edge states are obtained by solving the guidance condition det(I - R21 R23) = 0 (Eq. 9), which follows from the exact cylindrical boundary conditions; no experimental data or target values are fitted. The winding numbers in Fig. 2 are computed from the asymptotic planar transfer matrix and reflection coefficient, while the edge states in Figs. 3 and 4 are found from the poles of the same model's reflectivity, including an exact finite-core calculation with 13 cladding cells. The use of refs. [35,50], some with overlapping authorship, is methodological: they supply the radiative-topological-state formalism and the phase-spectroscopy technique, but the cylindrical generalization and all numerical results are original computations in this paper. The asymptotic planar approximation for the cladding is an assumption whose quantitative validity can be questioned, but that is a correctness or robustness concern, not a circularity, because the paper does not define the cylindrical result in terms of the planar result. No parameter is tuned to produce the claimed edge states, and no self-citation is used as the sole justification for a central result. The derivation chain is therefore not circular.

Assumptions & free parameters 6 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No free parameters are fitted to a target result; all parameters are design or material choices, and the topological result is computed from the transfer matrix rather than fitted. The main assumptions are cylindrical symmetry, the outgoing-wave condition, and the asymptotic convergence of radial gaps to planar Harper gaps. The paper introduces no new particle, force, or conserved quantity; the topological PCF is a device geometry, not an invented entity.

free parameters (6)
  • Harper modulation strength eta = not stated in the text; used in figures
    Controls the AAH layer displacement and affects gap widths and edge-state frequencies, but its numeric value is not given in the main text.
  • Refractive indices of cladding layers n_a, n_b = 4.6 (tellurium), 1.6 (polystyrene)
    Material parameters chosen by hand for the example; the existence of gaps depends on the index contrast.
  • Layer widths s_a, s_b = 0.33 d_o, 0.67 d_o
    Geometric parameters chosen by hand for the example.
  • Harper frequency gamma = 1/3
    Rational frequency chosen to realize a periodic supercell with q=3.
  • Core radius rho_1 = 2 d_o in Fig. 3
    Finite core radius affects the positions of allowed modes; chosen for the example.
  • Disorder strength sigma = 0 to 0.5 in Fig. 3d
    Perturbation amplitude for the robustness test; not fitted to data.
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption Cylindrical symmetry: the permittivity is piecewise constant in rho and independent of z and theta (epsilon(rho) = epsilon_j).
    Used from Eq. (1) onward; the entire transfer-matrix treatment assumes this symmetry.
  • domain assumption Waves propagate as e^{i(beta z - omega t)} and the angular mode number l is an integer.
    Separation of variables in cylindrical coordinates, stated before Eq. (1).
  • domain assumption Outgoing-wave condition in the outermost layer: R_{N,N+1}=0, with no incoming radiation from infinity.
    Sets up the recursive reflection matrix in Eq. (5); modes are leaky or complex-frequency states.
  • domain assumption Asymptotic convergence of the cylindrical cladding to a planar Harper multilayer for rho > rho_n.
    Appendix C; used to compute the gap structure and winding numbers with planar transfer matrices. This is the weakest assumption.
  • domain assumption Topological invariant of a gap is the winding number of the reflection coefficient as the synthetic phase chi varies.
    Follows refs. [35,50]; used to label gaps as trivial or nontrivial in Fig. 2.
  • standard math Standard Bessel and Hankel function identities and Wronskians.
    Used in Appendix A, e.g., Eqs. (A10)-(A12), to simplify the transfer matrices.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Topological photonic crystal fibers and ring resonators." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/26Q3TAWU

@misc{pith2026190902081,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Topological photonic crystal fibers and ring resonators},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/26Q3TAWU}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1909.02081}
}
read the original abstract

We study photonic crystal fibers and ring resonators with topological features induced by Aubry- Andre-Harper modulations of the cladding. We find non trivial gaps and edge states at the interface between regions with different Chern numbers. We calculate the field profile and eigenvalue dispersion by an exact recursive approach. Compared with conventional circular resonators and fibers, the proposed structure features topological protection and hence robustness against symmetry-preserving local perturbations that do not close the gap. These topological photonic crystal fibers sustain strong field localization and energy concentration at a given radial distance. As topological light guiding and trapping devices, they may bring about many opportunities for both fundamentals and applications unachievable with conventional optical devices.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 1909.02081 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. (Color online) Schematic representation of a) the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. a) Band structure, for TE polarization, in the asymp [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. Reflectivity map and edge states for TE polarization a) in the asymptotic limit and the exact solution for b) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (2 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. TE edge mode normalized field profile for the topolog [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. (Color online) Transfer matrix decomposition. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_5.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

55 extracted references · 55 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    eoz = [ H (1) 𝓁 (k2ρ1)T12−J𝓁(k1ρ1)R12 ] hoz = [ H (1) 𝓁 (k1ρ1) +J𝓁(k1ρ1)R11−H (1) 𝓁 (k2ρ1)T11 ]

  2. [2]

    For any mode a cutoff frequency is defined as the min- imum frequency to have a positive β2 = ω2 c2εj−k2 j value i.e

    eoz = [ H (1) 𝓁 (k2ρ1)T22−H (1) 𝓁 (k1ρ1) +J𝓁(k1ρ1)R22 ] hoz = [ J𝓁(k1ρ1)R21−H (1) 𝓁 (k2ρ1)T21 ] (B2) When 𝓁 = 0, modes are decoupled and can be classi- fied as either transverse electric, TE (2) with hz = 0, or transvers magnetic, TM (1) with ez = 0. For any mode a cutoff frequency is defined as the min- imum frequency to have a positive β2 = ω2 c2εj−k2 j va...

  3. [3]

    Raghu, F

    S. Raghu, F. D. M. Haldane, ”Analogs of quantum-hall- effect edge states in photonic crystals” Phys. Rev. A. 78, 033834 (2008)

  4. [4]

    F. D. M. Haldane, S. Raghu, ”Possible realization of directional optical waveguides in photonic crystals with broken time-reversal symmetry” Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 013904 (2008)

  5. [5]

    Wang et al., ”Reflection-Free One-Way Edge Modes in a Gyromagnetic Photonic Crystal” Phys

    Z. Wang et al., ”Reflection-Free One-Way Edge Modes in a Gyromagnetic Photonic Crystal” Phys. Rev. Lett., 100, 013905 (2008)

  6. [6]

    Wang, et al., ”Observation of unidirectional backscattering-immune topological electromagnetic states” Nature, 461, 772 (2009)

    Z. Wang, et al., ”Observation of unidirectional backscattering-immune topological electromagnetic states” Nature, 461, 772 (2009)

  7. [7]

    Hafezi et al., ”Robust optical delay lines with topo- logical protection” Nature Physics, 7, 907 (2011)

    M. Hafezi et al., ”Robust optical delay lines with topo- logical protection” Nature Physics, 7, 907 (2011)

  8. [8]

    K. Fang, Z. Yu, and S. Fan, ”Realizing effective mag- netic field for photons by controlling the phase of dy- namic modulation” Nature Photonics, 6, 782 (2012)

Show all 55 references
  1. [9]

    A. B. Khanikaev, et al., ”Photonic topological insulators” Nature Materials, 12, 233 (2012)

  2. [10]

    Skirlo, L

    S.A. Skirlo, L. Lu, M. Soljacic, ”Multimode One-Way Waveguides of Large Chern Numbers” Phys. Rev. Lett., 113, 113904 (2014)

  3. [11]

    Hafezi, et al., ”Imaging topological edge states in sil- icon photonics” Nature Photonics, 7, 1001 (2013)

    M. Hafezi, et al., ”Imaging topological edge states in sil- icon photonics” Nature Photonics, 7, 1001 (2013)

  4. [12]

    M. C. Rechtsman, et al. ”Photonic floquet topological insulators” Nature 496, 196 (2013)

  5. [13]

    Longhi, ”Topological Phase Transition in non- Hermitian Quasicrystals”, Phys

    S. Longhi, ”Topological Phase Transition in non- Hermitian Quasicrystals”, Phys. Rev. Lett., 122, 237601 (2019)

  6. [14]

    Qi-Bo Zeng, Yan-Bin Yang, Yong Xu, ”Topological Phases in Non-Hermitian Aubry-Andre-Harper Models”, arXiv:1901.08060

  7. [15]

    Pilozzi, C

    L. Pilozzi, C. Conti, ”Topological lasing in resonant pho- tonic structures” Phys. Rev. B 93 195317 (2016)

  8. [16]

    St-Jean, V

    P. St-Jean, V. Goblot, E. Galopin, A. Lematre, T. Ozawa, L. Le Gratiet, I. Sagnes, J. Bloch, A. Amo ”Las- ing in topological edge states of a one-dimensional lat- tice” Nature Photonics 11, 651 (2017)

  9. [17]

    Bahari, A

    B. Bahari, A. Ndao, F. Vallini, A. El Amili, Y. Fainman, B. Kante, ”Nonreciprocal lasing in topological cavities of arbitrary geometries” Science 358, 636 (2017)

  10. [18]

    Harari, M

    G. Harari, M. A. Bandres, Y. Lumer, M. C. Rechtsman, Y. D. Chong, M. Khajavikhan, D. N. Christodoulides, M. Segev, ”Topological insulator laser: Theory” Science 359 (2018)

  11. [19]

    Pilozzi, C

    L. Pilozzi, C. Conti, ”Topological cascade laser for fre- quency comb generation in PT-symmetric structures” Opt. Lett. 42, 5174 (2017)

  12. [20]

    Kruk et al.,”Nonlinear light generation in topological nanostructures” Nature Nanotechnology 14, 126 (2019)

    S. Kruk et al.,”Nonlinear light generation in topological nanostructures” Nature Nanotechnology 14, 126 (2019)

  13. [21]

    Koshelev, G

    K. Koshelev, G. Favraud, A. Bogdanov, Y. Kivshar, A. Fratalocchi, ”Nonradiating photonics with resonant di- electric nanostructures”, Nanophotonics 8, 725 (2019)

  14. [22]

    Mittal, V

    S. Mittal, V. Vikram Orre, and M. Hafezi ”Topologically robust transport of entangled photons in a 2d photonic system” Opt. Express 24,15631 (2016) 9

  15. [23]

    M. C. Rechtsman, Y. Lumer, Y. Plotnik, A. Perez-Leija, A. Szameit, and M. Segev, ”Topological protection of photonic path entanglement” Optica 3, 925 (2016)

  16. [24]

    Mittal, E.A

    S. Mittal, E.A. Goldschmidt, M. Hafezi, ”A topological source of quantum light” Nature 561, 502 (2018)

  17. [25]

    Pilozzi, F.A

    L. Pilozzi, F.A. Farrelly, G. Marcucci, C. Conti, ”Ma- chine learning inverse problem for topological photonics”, Communication Physics 1, 57 (2018)

  18. [26]

    Y. Long, J. Ren, Y. Li, and H. Chen, ”Inverse design of photonic topological state via machine learning”, Appl. Phys. Lett. 114,181105 (2019)

  19. [27]

    D. J. Thouless, M. Kohmoto, M. P. Nightingale, M. den Nijs, ”Quantized Hall Conductance in a Two- Dimensional Periodic Potential”. Phys. Rev. Lett. 49, 405 (1982)

  20. [28]

    Hatsugai ”Edge states in the integer quantum Hall effect and the Riemann surface of the Bloch function” Phys

    Y. Hatsugai ”Edge states in the integer quantum Hall effect and the Riemann surface of the Bloch function” Phys. Rev. B 48, 11851 (1993)

  21. [29]

    Ozawa, H

    T. Ozawa, H. M. Price, N. Goldman, O. Zilberberg, and I. Carusotto, ”Synthetic dimensions in integrated pho- tonics: from optical isolation to four-dimensional quan- tum Hall physics”, Phys. Rev. A 93, 043827 (2016

  22. [30]

    L. Yuan, Q. Lin, M. Xiao, and S. Fan, ”Synthetic dimen- sion in photonics” Optica 5, 1396, (2018)

  23. [31]

    Lustig, S

    E. Lustig, S. Weimann, Y. Plotnik, Y. Lumer, Miguel A. Bandres, A. Szameit, M. Segev ”Photonic topologi- cal insulator in synthetic dimensions” Nature 567, 356 (2019)

  24. [32]

    P. G. Harper, ”The General Motion of Conduction Elec- trons in a Uniform Magnetic Field, with Application to the Diamagnetism of Metals”, Proc. Phys. Soc., Lon- don, Sect. A 68, 874 (1955)

  25. [33]

    Aubry and G

    S. Aubry and G. Andre, ”Analicity breaking and Ander- son localization in incommensurate lattices” Ann. Isr. Phys. Soc. 3, 133 (1980)

  26. [34]

    Y. E. Kraus, Y. Lahini, Z. Ringel, M. Verbin, O. Zil- berberg ”Topological States and Adiabatic Pumping in Quasicrystals”, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109,106402 (2012)

  27. [35]

    Ganeshan, K

    S. Ganeshan, K. Sun, S. Das Sarma, ”Topological Zero- Energy Modes in Gapless Commensurate Aubry-Andre- Harper Models”, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110,180403 (2013)

  28. [36]

    D. R. Hofstadter, ”Energy levels and wave functions of Bloch electrons in rational and irrational magnetic fields”, Phys. Rev. B 14, 2239 (1976)

  29. [37]

    A. V. Poshakinskiy, A. N. Poddubny, L. Pilozzi, E. L. Ivchenko, ”Radiative topological states in resonant pho- tonic crystals”, Phys. Rev., Lett., 112, 107403 (2014)

  30. [38]

    P. Yeh, A. Yariv, and E. Marom, ”Theory of Bragg fiber” J. Opt. Soc. Am. 68, 1196 (1978)

  31. [39]

    S. G. Johnson, M. Ibanescu, M. Skorobogatiy, O. Weis- berg, T. D. Engeness, M. Soljacic, S. A. Jacobs, J. D. Joannopoulos, and Y. Fink, ”Low-loss asymptot- ically single-mode propagation in large-core OmniGuide fibers” Opt. Express 9, 748 (2001)

  32. [40]

    Knight, J

    J.C. Knight, J. Broeng, T.A. Birks, ”Photonic band gap guidance in optical fibers” Science 282, (1998)

  33. [41]

    Russell, ”Photonic crystal fibers” Science, 299, (2003)

    P. Russell, ”Photonic crystal fibers” Science, 299, (2003)

  34. [42]

    Cregan, B.J

    R.F. Cregan, B.J. Mangan, J.C. Knight, T.A. Birks ”Single-mode photonic band gap guidance of light in air” Science, 285 (1999)

  35. [43]

    X. Wang, Z. Chen, and J. Yang ”Guiding light in op- tically induced ring lattices with a low-refractive-index core” Opt. Lett. 31, 1887 (2006)

  36. [44]

    L. Lu, H. Gao, Z. Wang ”Topological one-way fiber of second Chern number” Nature Communications 9, 5384 (2018)

  37. [45]

    Wong et al., ”Excitation of Orbital Angular Momen- tum Resonances in Helically Twisted Photonic Crystal Fiber”, Science 337, 6093 (2012)

    G. Wong et al., ”Excitation of Orbital Angular Momen- tum Resonances in Helically Twisted Photonic Crystal Fiber”, Science 337, 6093 (2012)

  38. [46]

    Butsch, C

    A. Butsch, C. Conti, F. Biancalana, and P.St.J. Rus- sel, ”Optomechanical Self-Channeling of Light in a Sus- pended Planar Dual-Nanoweb Waveguide”, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 093903 (2012)

  39. [47]

    M. K. Garbos, T. G. Euser, O. A. Schmidt, S. Un- terkofler, P. S. Russell, ”Doppler velocimetry on mi- croparticles trapped and propelled by laser light in liquid- filled photonic crystal fiber”, Opt. Lett. 11, 2020 (2011)

  40. [48]

    Scheuer and A

    J. Scheuer and A. Yariv, ”Annular Bragg defect mode resonators” J. Opt. Soc. Amer. B, 20, 2285 (2003)

  41. [49]

    Y. Xu, R.K. Lee and A. Yariv, ”Asymptotic analysis of Bragg fibers,” Opt. Lett. 25, 1756 (2000)

  42. [50]

    Y. Xu, G. X. Ouyang, R. K. Lee, A. Yariv, ”Asymptotic Matrix Theory of Bragg Fibers”, Journal of Lightwave technology, 20, 428 (2002)

  43. [51]

    W. C. Chew, ”Waves and Fields in Inhomogeneous Me- dia” New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold, 1990

  44. [52]

    A. V. Poshakinskiy, A. N. Poddubny, and M. Hafezi, ”Phase spectroscopy of topological invariants in photonic crystals”, Phys. Rev. A 91, 043830 (2015)

  45. [53]

    Y. Xu, W. Liang, A. Yariv, J. G. Fleming and Shawn- Yu Lin ”High-quality-factor Bragg onion resonators with omnidirectional reflector cladding” Opt. Lett. 28, 2144 (2003)

  46. [54]

    K. C. Huang, E. Lidorikis, X. Jiang, J. D. Joannopoulos, and K. A. Nelson, ”Nature of lossy Bloch states in po- laritonic photonic crystals”, Phys. Rev. B 69, 195111 (2004)

  47. [55]

    M. Z. Hasan and C. L. Kane, ”Colloquium: Topological insulators”, Rev. Mod. Phys. 82, 3045 (2010)

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.