Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Non-Backtracking Centrality Based Random Walk on Networks

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1803.03087 v1 pith:2DKEDZSJ submitted 2018-03-08 cs.SI physics.soc-ph

classification cs.SIphysics.soc-ph
keywords randomwalkscentralitynbcrwnon-backtrackingbiaseddistributionhitting
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Random walks are a fundamental tool for analyzing realistic complex networked systems and implementing randomized algorithms to solve diverse problems such as searching and sampling. For many real applications, their actual effect and convenience depend on the properties (e.g. stationary distribution and hitting time) of random walks, with biased random walks often outperforming traditional unbiased random walks (TURW). In this paper, we present a new class of biased random walks, non-backtracking centrality based random walks (NBCRW) on a network, where the walker prefers to jump to neighbors with high non-backtracking centrality that has some advantages over eigenvector centrality. We study some properties of the non-backtracking matrix of a network, on the basis of which we propose a theoretical framework for fast computation of the transition probabilities, stationary distribution, and hitting times for NBCRW on the network. Within the paradigm, we study NBCRW on some model and real networks and compare the results with those corresponding to TURW and maximal entropy random walks (MERW), with the latter being biased random walks based on eigenvector centrality. We show that the behaviors of stationary distribution and hitting times for NBCRW widely differ from those associated with TURW and MERW, especially for heterogeneous networks.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools