Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 41 references

Estimates for Schr\"{o}dinger Groups and Imaginary Power Operators on Weak Hardy Spaces Associated with Non-negative Self-adjoint Operators and Ball Quasi-Banach Function Spaces

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-05 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Schrödinger groups and imaginary power operators are bounded, with explicit polynomial growth in time, on weak Hardy spaces modeled on ball quasi-Banach function spaces.

desk verdict New Schrödinger-group estimates on weak Hardy spaces for ball quasi-Banach spaces, but the endpoint of Theorem 1.8 is not proved. read the letter →

arxiv 2508.13913 v2 pith:2E254W77 submitted 2025-08-19 math.CA

Xiong Liu , Wenhua Wang This is my paper · ORCID
classification math.CA MSC 42B3542B3042B25
keywords WeakHardyspacesBallquasi-BanachfunctionNon-negativeself-adjointoperatorsDavies-GaffneyestimatesSchrödingergroupsImaginarypowerAtomicdecompositionsofhomogeneoustype
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper proves time-growth estimates for Schrödinger flows associated with a broad class of differential operators. On a doubling metric measure space, for any non-negative self-adjoint operator L whose heat semigroup satisfies the Davies-Gaffney off-diagonal decay, it introduces a weak Hardy space WH_{X,L} built from a ball quasi-Banach function space X — a norm on measurable functions that only needs ball indicators to be finite. It shows that both the regularized Schrödinger group (I+L)^{-β/2}e^{iτL^{γ/2}} and, under stronger Gaussian kernel assumptions, the imaginary power operator L^{iτ} map WH_{X,L} to itself with bounds growing like (1+|τ|)^{n(1/s0−r/2)}. The same estimates hold for the strong Hardy space by embedding, and the framework covers weighted Lebesgue, Orlicz, variable Lebesgue, and mixed-norm Lebesgue spaces, where the results are claimed to be new even in Euclidean settings. The starting point is an atomic/molecular characterization of WH_{X,L}, whose proof the authors defer to an independent companion result.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the atomic decomposition of WH_{X,L} (Theorem 1.6, proved in a companion paper): every f in the space is a sum of (X,M)L-atoms a_{i,j} supported, up to L^M smoothing, on balls B_{i,j}, with level-dependent coefficients λ_{i,j}=2^i||1_{B_{i,j}}||_X. The norm is controlled by sup_i ||(Σ_j [λ_{i,j}1_{B_{i,j}}/||1_{B_{i,j}}||_X]^{s0})^{1/s0}||_X. The operator is applied via the spectral functional calculus plus the identity I=(I−e^{-r_B^2 L})^M+P(r_B^2 L), splitting each transformed atom into a part with good off-diagonal decay and a part supported near the original ball. The main local estimates (3.6)–(3.7) and (4.6)–(4.7) give L2 decay 2^{-kβ/γ} or 2^{-kα} on the k-t

What would settle it

The decisive test is estimate (3.6)/(4.6): pick L=−Δ on R^n, take X=L^1(R^n) with an atom a supported in the unit ball, and compute the L^2 norm of S_L((I+L)^{-β/2}e^{iτL^{γ/2}}a) on the annulus U_k((1+|τ|)B). If the decay in k is slower than 2^{-kβ/γ}, the local estimate fails and the polynomial bound on WH_{1,−Δ} would be false. Simpler: for L=−Δ and X=L^1, test directly whether the weak Hardy norm of the flow can grow faster than (1+|τ|)^{n/2} for a well-chosen f; the theorem predicts it cannot.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that, for 0<γ≠1, β≥γn(1/s0−1/2), r∈(0,1], and τ∈R, every f∈WH_{X,L} satisfies ||(I+L)^{-β/2}e^{iτL^{γ/2}}f||_{WH_{X,L}} ≤ C(1+|τ|)^{n(1/s0−r/2)}||f||_{WH_{X,L}}; and, if the space is Ahlfors n-regular, L has Gaussian heat-kernel upper bounds and the spectral multiplier kernels satisfy condition (1.8), then for α>n(1/s0−1/2), r∈(n/s0/(α+n/2),1], ||L^{iτ}f||_{WH_{X,L}} ≤ C(1+|τ|)^{n(1/s0−r/2)}||f||_{WH_{X,L}}. Here s0 is the exponent controlling the boundedness of the Hardy–Littlewood maximal operator on a convexified associate space. The proof reduces the operator action to atoms localized in balls B, estimates the Lusin area function of the transformed atom on annuli of

Load-bearing premise

The estimates rest on the atomic and molecular characterization of WH_{X,L} stated as Theorem 1.6, whose proof is not given here but is referred to an independent companion result; any hidden extra condition on the ball quasi-Banach function space in that characterization would invalidate the main theorems.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Strong Hardy spaces H_{X,L} inherit the same polynomial growth because H_{X,L} embeds continuously into WH_{X,L}; this is why the results are stated as new for strong Hardy spaces too.
  • The Riesz means I_{s,t}(L) associated with L^{γ/2} are uniformly bounded on WH_{X,L} for s≥γn(1/s0−1/2), by the same argument used in Corollary 1.12.
  • Taking X=L^r on a doubling space recovers and extends earlier Schrödinger-group estimates for r∈(0,1] under the Davies-Gaffney assumption, which is weaker than Gaussian upper bounds.
  • Instantiating X with weighted Lebesgue, Orlicz, variable Lebesgue, or mixed-norm Lebesgue spaces yields four families of new theorems on those spaces, including Euclidean R^n and Hermite operators.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • We read the proof as suggesting the same machinery works for any spectral multiplier whose derivatives obey the Hörmander-type conditions used in (1.8); the paper only states the two applications and does not draw this multiplier-theorem consequence.
  • The exponent n(1/s0−r/2) is not flagged by the authors as sharp; a natural test is to compare it with known sharp exponents for L=−Δ on R^n and X=L^r, which could indicate whether the r-choice is genuine or an artifact of the proof.
  • Because Theorem 1.6 is imported from [29], a prudent check is to verify that the ball quasi-Banach spaces in Section 5 meet the hypotheses of [29] exactly as stated; if any of those spaces requires an extra separability or Fatou condition, some of the advertised applications would need adjustment.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper develops weak Hardy spaces WH_{X,L} associated with a ball quasi-Banach function space X and a nonnegative self-adjoint operator L satisfying Davies-Gaffney estimates. Theorem 1.6 states atomic and molecular decompositions for these spaces, but the proof is not included; the authors refer to the concurrent paper [29]. The main results are Theorem 1.8, a sharp time-growth estimate for the Schrödinger group (I+L)^{-β/2}e^{iτL^{γ/2}} on WH_{X,L}, and Theorem 1.15, an analogous bound for imaginary powers L^{iτ} under Gaussian kernel assumptions. Section 5 applies these results to Orlicz, variable Lebesgue, weighted Lebesgue, and mixed-norm Lebesgue spaces. The proofs combine the imported atomic decomposition with functional calculus estimates from [4] and [3] and with norm estimates (3.6)-(3.7) and (4.6)-(4.7).

Significance. If the stated estimates are fully established, the paper would provide a substantial extension of Schrödinger-group and imaginary-power estimates from the known L^p/classical Hardy-space setting to weak Hardy spaces built on very general ball quasi-Banach function spaces. The framework is broad and the applications to weighted, mixed-norm, Orlicz, and variable Lebesgue spaces are potentially useful. The paper is written in a clear style, and, conditional on the quoted atomic decomposition, the local estimates (3.6)-(3.7) and (4.6)-(4.7) are presented in detail. No fitted parameters or circular argument appear. However, the main theorems as stated are not fully supported by the proofs: the parameter r in Theorem 1.8 and the endpoint cases in both main theorems are not covered by the estimates that are actually derived.

major comments (4)
  1. [§3, proof of Theorem 1.8, Eqs. (3.17)-(3.18)] The theorem allows β ≥ γn(1/s0 − 1/2) and every r∈(0,1]. In estimating I2 the proof asserts: “Since β>γn(1/s0 − 1/2), it follows that there exists r∈(0,1) such that β>γn(1/(r s0) − 1/2).” The subsequent k-summation requires r > n/s0 / (β/γ + n/2). At the endpoint β = γn(1/s0 − 1/2) this threshold equals 1, so no such r<1 exists and the k-sum diverges. Even when β is strictly above the endpoint, the proof produces the estimate (3.18) for the auxiliary r chosen by the author, not for the arbitrary r appearing in the theorem statement; in particular r=1 is excluded by construction. Thus inequality (1.5) is not proved for the full parameter range stated in the abstract and in Theorem 1.8.
  2. [§4, proof of Theorem 1.15, Eqs. (4.13)-(4.14)] The same issue occurs in the II2 estimate. The proof chooses r∈(n/s0/(α+n/2),1), while the theorem states r∈[n/s0/(α+n/2),1]. At the lower endpoint the k-exponent s0[rα − (1/s0 − r/2)n] vanishes, so the sum over k diverges and the stated bound (1.9) is not obtained. The endpoint r=1 is also not covered by the open interval used in the proof. The theorem’s parameter range therefore needs to be narrowed, or a separate argument for the missing endpoints must be supplied.
  3. [Theorems 1.9 and 1.10] These strong-Hardy-space results are stated without proof, with the remark that the proofs are similar. The exponent in Theorem 1.9 is n(1/s0 − 1/2), which corresponds exactly to the r=1 endpoint of Theorem 1.8. If Theorem 1.9 is intended to follow from Theorem 1.8 with r=1, then the missing endpoint argument for Theorem 1.8 must be provided. If it is proved by a separate route, that route should be written out, especially because the endpoint β=γn(1/s0−1/2) is included in the statement.
  4. [Theorem 1.6 and Remark 1.7] The atomic and molecular decomposition is not proved in this paper; the reader is referred to [29, Theorems 3.4 and 3.5]. This is bibliographically acceptable provided the hypotheses match exactly. Since both (3.3) and (4.3) are imported from that result, the authors should explicitly state that Assumptions 1.3 and 1.4 (with the same range of s0 and q0) are precisely the assumptions of [29, Theorems 3.4 and 3.5], with no additional restriction on the ball quasi-Banach space X. Any unstated condition in [29] would propagate to Theorems 1.8 and 1.15.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Section 5, Theorems 5.4-5.7 and 5.11-5.14] The exponent n(1/s0 − r/2) contains s0, but s0 is not introduced in the statements of these theorems. The statements should either assume s0 explicitly or quantify it as “there exists s0∈(0,min{1,p−}) such that…”.
  2. [Definition 2.9] “the some way” should be “the same way”.
  3. [Proof of Theorem 5.16] The final sentence says “This completes the proof of Theorem 5.10”; it should refer to Theorem 5.16.
  4. [Acknowledgements] “supporeted” should be “supported”.
  5. [Notation in §3] The symbol r is used both for the fixed parameter in Theorem 1.8 and for the auxiliary exponent chosen in the proof of I2. This makes the argument hard to follow and contributes to the confusion about which r appears in the final estimate. Please use a different symbol, e.g. u, for the auxiliary exponent.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the main weak-Hardy estimates rely on external functional-calculus bounds and an independently obtained atomic decomposition, with no fitted parameter or self-citation chain carrying the argument.

full rationale

The paper's central results, Theorems 1.8 and 1.15, are derived from the atomic/molecular characterization of WH_{X,L} stated as Theorem 1.6. The proof of Theorem 1.6 is not given in this paper; instead the authors explicitly refer to the independent, concurrent work [29] by X. Lin, D. Yang, S. Yang and W. Yuan, whose authors do not overlap with the present authors. This is ordinary reliance on an external published result, not circular self-citation. The subsequent norm estimates (3.6), (3.7), (4.6), and (4.7) are obtained from the functional-calculus estimates in [4] and [3], which are also external and do not presuppose the weak-Hardy bounds being proved. No parameter is fitted to the target data, and no quantity is defined in terms of the conclusion. The applications to Orlicz, variable, weighted, and mixed-norm spaces only verify that the relevant BQBF spaces satisfy Assumptions 1.3 and 1.4, again by citing external maximal-inequality and duality results. The skeptical note about the endpoint case beta = gamma n(1/s0 - 1/2) concerns whether the displayed proof's k-summation converges at an endpoint included in the statement; that is a correctness or gap issue, not a circularity, and therefore does not raise the circularity score. Overall, the derivation chain is self-contained with respect to circularity, and the cited external inputs are load-bearing but legitimate.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 7 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no new physical or mathematical entities and fits no free parameters to data. The central claims rest on structural assumptions about the BQBF space (Assumptions 1.3 and 1.4), kernel estimates for L (Assumptions 1.5, 1.13 and 1.14), and the imported atomic decomposition from [29]. The Schr\"odinger and imaginary power estimates are derived from these inputs with explicit constants.

assumptions (7)
  • domain assumption Assumption 1.3: vector-valued Fefferman-Stein inequality for the Hardy-Littlewood maximal operator on the BQBF space X.
    Used in Lemmas 2.1 and 2.5 and throughout the proofs of Theorems 1.8 and 1.15 to control sums of localized operators.
  • domain assumption Assumption 1.4: X^{1/s0} is a BBF space and M is bounded on the (q0/s0)'-convexification of its associate space.
    This is the structural condition needed for the atomic/molecular decomposition and for the norm estimates used in step II1 of Theorem 1.8 and II1 of Theorem 1.15.
  • domain assumption Assumption 1.5: Davies-Gaffney estimate for the semigroup e^{-tL}.
    This kernel bound is the operator-level hypothesis for Theorems 1.6, 1.8 and 1.9.
  • domain assumption Assumption 1.13: Gaussian upper bound for the heat kernels of L.
    Required for the imaginary power operator results in Theorems 1.15 and 1.16.
  • domain assumption Assumption 1.14: weighted L2 estimate (1.8) for kernels of spectral multipliers F(L).
    Used to control the kernel of L^{i tau} through the functional calculus in the proof of Theorem 1.15.
  • domain assumption Theorem 1.6 from [29]: atomic and molecular characterizations of WH_{X,L}.
    The paper explicitly omits the proof and refers to [29, Theorems 3.4 and 3.5]. All subsequent boundedness results depend on this theorem.
  • domain assumption Sharp functional calculus estimates from [4, pp.287-288] and [3, (3.7)].
    The decay estimates (3.6), (3.7), (4.6) and (4.7) for the area function applied to atoms are quoted from these external papers.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Estimates for Schr\"{o}dinger Groups and Imaginary Power Operators on Weak Hardy Spaces Associated with Non-negative Self-adjoint Operators and Ball Quasi-Banach Function Spaces." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/2E254W77

@misc{pith2026250813913,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Estimates for Schr\"odinger Groups and Imaginary Power Operators on Weak Hardy Spaces Associated with Non-negative Self-adjoint Operators and Ball Quasi-Banach Function Spaces},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/2E254W77}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2508.13913}
}
abstract

Let $(\mathbb{X},d,\mu)$ be a doubling metric measure space, $L$ a non-negative self-adjoint operator on $L^2(\mathbb{X})$ satisfying the Davies-Gaffney estimate, and $X(\mathbb{X})$ a ball quasi-Banach function space on $\mathbb{X}$ satisfying some mild assumptions with $p\in(0,\infty)$ and $s_0\in(0,\min\{p,1\}]$. In this article, the authors study the weak Hardy space $WH_{X,L}(\mathbb{X})$ associated with $L$ and $X(\mathbb{X})$, and then give the atomic and molecular decompositions of $WH_{X,L}(\mathbb{X})$. As applications, the authors establish the boundedness estimate of Schr\"{o}dinger groups for fractional powers of $L$ on $WH_{X,L}(\mathbb{X})$: $$\left\|(I+L)^{-\beta/2}e^{i\tau L^{\gamma/2}}f\right\|_{WH_{X,L}(\mathbb{X})}\leq C\left(1+|\tau|\right)^{n(\frac{1}{s_0}-\frac{r}{2})}\|f\|_{WH_{X,L}(\mathbb{X})},$$ where $0<\gamma\neq1$, $\beta\in[\gamma n(\frac{1}{s_0}-\frac{1}{2}),\infty)$, $r\in(0,1]$, $\tau\in \mathbb{R}$, and $C>0$ is a constant. Moreover, when $(\mathbb{X},d,\mu)$ is an Ahlfors $n$-regular metric measure space and $L$ satisfies the Gaussian upper bound estimate, the authors also obtain the boundedness estimate of imaginary power operators of $L$ on $WH_{X,L}(\mathbb{X})$: $$\left\|L^{i\tau}f\right\|_{WH_{X,L}(\mathbb{X})}\leq C\left(1+|\tau|\right)^{n(\frac{1}{s_0}-\frac{r}{2})}\|f\|_{WH_{X,L}(\mathbb{X})},$$ where $\alpha>n(\frac{1}{s_0}-\frac{1}{2})$, $r\in(\frac{n/s_0}{\alpha+n/2},1]$, $\tau\in \mathbb{R}$, and $C>0$ is a constant. These results are also novelty for strong Hardy spaces $H_{X,L}(\mathbb{X})$. Moreover, all these results have a wide range of generality and, particularly, even when they are applied to weighted Lebesgue spaces, mixed-norm Lebesgue spaces, Orlicz spaces, variable Lebesgue spaces and Euclidean spaces setting, these results are also new.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

41 extracted references · 41 canonical work pages

  1. [29]

    X. Lin, D. Yang, S. Yang, W. Yuan, Weak Hardy spaces associated with operators and ball quasi-Banach function spaces on doubling metric measure spaces, J. Geom. Anal. 35 (2025), Paper No. 310

    work page 2025

  2. [4]

    T. A. Bui, P. D’Ancona and X.T. Duong, On sharp estimates for Schr ¨odinger groups of fractional powers of nonnegative self-adjoint operators, J. Differential Equations 381 (2024), 260-292

    work page 2024

  3. [3]

    T. A. Bui, T. Q. Bui, Q. Hong and G. Hu, Imaginary power operators on Hardy spaces, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 150 (2022), 4855-4866

    work page 2022

  4. [1]

    Benedek and R

    A. Benedek and R. Panzone, The space Lp, with mixed norm, Duke Math. J. 28 (1961), 301-324

    work page 1961

  5. [2]

    Bennett and R

    C. Bennett and R. Sharpley, Interpolation of Operators, Pure and Applied Mathematics 129, Academic Press Inc., Boston, MA, 1988

    work page 1988

  6. [5]

    T. A. Bui, P. D’Ancona, X. T. Duong and D. M ¨uller, On the flows associated to selfadjoint operators on metric measure spaces, Math. Ann. 375 (2019), 1393-1426. Schr¨odinger Groups of Fractional Powers and Imaginary Power Operators on Weak Hardy Spaces 35

    work page 2019

  7. [6]

    T. A. Bui, P. D’Ancona and F. Nicola, Sharp Lp estimates for Schr¨odinger groups on spaces of homogeneous type, Rev. Mat. Iberoam. 36 (2020), 455-484

    work page 2020

  8. [7]

    T. A. Bui, X.T. Duong, Q. Hong and G. Hu, On Schr ¨odinger groups of fractional powers of Hermite operators, Int. Math. Res. Not. IMRN (2024), 6164-6185

    work page 2024

Show all 41 references
  1. [8]

    T. A. Bui and F. K. Ly, Sharp estimates for Schr¨odinger groups on Hardy spaces for 0< p≤ 1, J. Fourier Anal. Appl. 28 (2022), Paper No. 70, 23 pp

    2022

  2. [9]

    Cao, D.-C

    J. Cao, D.-C. Chang, H. Wu and D. Yang, Weak Hardy spacesWH p L(Rn) associated to opera- tors satisfying k-Davies-Gaffney estimates, J. Nonlinear Convex Anal. 16 (2015), 1205-1255

    2015

  3. [10]

    Chen, X.T

    P. Chen, X.T. Duong, J. Li, L. Song and L. Yan, Weak type (1 , 1) bounds for Schr ¨odinger groups, Michigan Math. J. 73 (2023), 97-122

    2023

  4. [11]

    Chen, X.T

    P. Chen, X.T. Duong, J. Li and L. Yan, Sharp endpoint Lp estimates for Schr¨odinger groups, Math. Ann. 378 (2020), 667-702

    2020

  5. [12]

    Chen, X.T

    P. Chen, X.T. Duong, J. Li and L. Yan, Sharp endpoint estimates for Schr ¨odinger groups on Hardy spaces, J. Differential Equations 371 (2023), 660-690

    2023

  6. [13]

    R. R. Coifman and G. Weiss, Extensions of Hardy spaces and their use in analysis, Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. 83 (1977), 569-645

    1977

  7. [14]

    Coulhon and A

    T. Coulhon and A. Sikora, Gaussian heat kernel upper bounds via the Phragmen-Lindelof theorem, Proc. Lond. Math. Soc. 96 (2008), 507-544

    2008

  8. [15]

    Cruz-Uribe and A

    D. Cruz-Uribe and A. Fiorenza, Variable Lebesgue Spaces, Foundations and Harmonic Anal- ysis, Applied and Numerical Harmonic Analysis, Springer, Heidelberg (2013)

    2013

  9. [16]

    F. Dai, X. Lin, D. Yang, W. Yuan and Y . Zhang, Brezis-Van Schaftingen-Yung formulae in ball Banach function spaces with applications to fractional Sobolev and Gagliardo-Nirenberg inequalities, Calc. Var. Partial Differential Equations 62 (2023), Paper No. 56, 73 pp

    2023

  10. [17]

    Diening, P

    L. Diening, P. Harjulehto, P. H ¨ast¨o and M. Ru ˇziˇcka, Lebesgue and Sobolev Spaces with Variable Exponents, Lecture Notes in Mathematics 2017, Springer, Heidelberg (2011)

    2017

  11. [18]

    Fe fferman and E

    C. Fe fferman and E. M. Stein, H p spaces of several variables, Acta Math. 129 (1972), 137- 193

    1972

  12. [19]

    X. Fu, T. Ma and D. Yang, Real-variable characterizations of Musielak-Orlicz Hardy spaces on spaces of homogeneous type, Ann. Acad. Sci. Fenn. Math. 45 (2020), 343-410

    2020

  13. [20]

    H ¨ormander, Estimates for translation invariant operators in Lp spaces, Acta Math

    L. H ¨ormander, Estimates for translation invariant operators in Lp spaces, Acta Math. 104 (1960), 93-140

    1960

  14. [21]

    Grafakos, L

    L. Grafakos, L. Liu and D. Yang, Vector-valued singular integrals and maximal functions on spaces of homogeneous type, Math. Scand. 104 (2009), 296-310

    2009

  15. [22]

    Heinone, Lectures on Analysis on Metric Spaces, Universitext, Springer-Verlag, New York, 2001

    J. Heinone, Lectures on Analysis on Metric Spaces, Universitext, Springer-Verlag, New York, 2001

    2001

  16. [23]

    Hofmann, G

    S. Hofmann, G. Lu, D. Mitrea, M. Mitrea and L. Yan, Hardy spaces associated to nonnega- tive self-adjoint operators satisfying Davies-Gaffney estimates, Mem. Amer. Math. Soc. 214 (2011), no. 1007, vi+78 pp

    2011

  17. [24]

    Huang and D

    L. Huang and D. Yang, On function spaces with mixed norms–a survey, J. Math. Study 54 (2021), 262-336

    2021

  18. [25]

    Jiang and D

    R. Jiang and D. Yang, Orlicz-Hardy spaces associated with operators satisfying Davies- Gaffney estimates, Commun. Contemp. Math. 13 (2011), 331-373

    2011

  19. [26]

    X. Lin, D. Yang, S. Yang and W. Yuan, Maximal function characterizations of Hardy spaces associated with both non-negative self-adjoint operators satisfying Gaussian estimates and ball quasi-Banach function spaces, Acta Math. Sci. Ser. B (Engl. Ed.) 44 (2024), 484-514. 36 Xion...

    2024

  20. [27]

    X. Lin, D. Yang, S. Yang and W. Yuan, Maximal function and Riesz transform characteriza- tions of Hardy spaces associated with homogeneous higher order elliptic operators and ball quasi-Banach function spaces, Constr. Approx. 61 (2025), 1-61

    2025

  21. [28]

    X. Lin, D. Yang, S. Yang and W. Yuan, Hardy spaces associated with non-negative self- adjoint operators and ball quasi-Banach function spaces on doubling metric measure spaces and their applications, Commun. Math. Stat. (2024), https: //doi.org/10.1007/s40304-023- 00376-0

    2024 doi

  22. [30]

    M. M. Rao and Z. D. Ren, Theory of Orlicz Spaces, Monographs and Textbooks in Pure and Applied Mathematics, Marcel Dekker Inc., New York (1991)

    1991

  23. [31]

    Sawano, K.-P

    Y . Sawano, K.-P. Ho, D. Yang and S. Yang, Hardy spaces for ball quasi-Banach function spaces, Dissertationes Math. 525 (2017), 1-102

    2017

  24. [32]

    J. O. Str ¨omberg and A. Torchinsky, Weighted Hardy Spaces, Lecture Notes in Mathematics, vol. 1381. Springer, Berlin (1989)

    1989

  25. [33]

    J. Sun, D. Yang and W. Yuan, Molecular characterization of weak Hardy spaces associated with ball quasi-Banach function spaces on spaces of homogeneous type with its applications to Littlewood-Paley function characterizations, Forum Math. 34 (2022), 1539-1589

    2022

  26. [34]

    J. Sun, D. Yang and W. Yuan, Weak Hardy spaces associated with ball quasi-Banach function spaces on spaces of homogeneous type: Decompositions, real interpolation, and Calder ´on- Zygmund operators, J. Geom. Anal. 32 (2022), Paper No. 191, 85 pp

    2022

  27. [35]

    F. Wang, D. Yang and S. Yang, Applications of Hardy spaces associated with ball quasi- Banach function spaces, Results Math. 75 (2020), Paper No. 26, 58 pp

    2020

  28. [36]

    S. Wang, D. Yang, W. Yuan and Y . Zhang, Weak Hardy-type spaces associated with ball quasi-Banach function spaces II: Littlewood-Paley characterizations and real interpolation, J. Geom. Anal. 31 (2021), 631-696

    2021

  29. [37]

    X. Yan, Z. He, D. Yang and W. Yuan, Hardy spaces associated with ball quasi-Banach func- tion spaces on spaces of homogeneous type: Littlewood-Paley characterizations with ap- plications to boundedness of Calder ´on-Zygmund operators, Acta Math. Sin. (Engl. Ser.) 38 (2022), 1133-1184

    2022

  30. [38]

    X. Yan, Z. He, D. Yang and W. Yuan, Hardy spaces associated with ball quasi-Banach func- tion spaces on spaces of homogeneous type: Characterizations of maximal functions, de- compositions, and dual spaces, Math. Nachr. 296 (2023), 3056-3116

    2023

  31. [39]

    Zhang, D

    Y . Zhang, D. Yang, W. Yuan and S. Wang, Weak Hardy-type spaces associated with ball quasi-Banach function spaces I: Decompositions with applications to boundedness of Calder´on-Zygmund operators, Sci. China Math. 64 (2021), 2007-2064

    2021

  32. [40]

    C. Zhuo, Y . Sawano and D. Yang, Hardy spaces with variable exponents on RD-spaces and applications, Dissertationes Math. 520 (2016), 74 pp

    2016

  33. [41]

    Zhuo and D

    C. Zhuo and D. Yang, Variable weak Hardy spaces WH p(·) L (Rn) associated with operators satisfying Davies-Gaffney estimates, Forum Math. 31 (2018), 579-605. Xiong Liu: School of Mathematics and Physics, Gansu Center for Fundamental Research in Com- plex Systems Analysis and C...

    2018

Pith tools

Reviewed August 5, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.