Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Resistance Against Manipulative AI: key factors and possible actions

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2404.14230 v2 pith:2FKDUBOG submitted 2024-04-22 cs.HC

classification cs.HC
keywords manipulationfactorsllmswhatactionsassociatedcharacteristicsexperiments
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

If AI is the new electricity, what should we do to keep ourselves from getting electrocuted? In this work, we explore factors related to the potential of large language models (LLMs) to manipulate human decisions. We describe the results of two experiments designed to determine what characteristics of humans are associated with their susceptibility to LLM manipulation, and what characteristics of LLMs are associated with their manipulativeness potential. We explore human factors by conducting user studies in which participants answer general knowledge questions using LLM-generated hints, whereas LLM factors by provoking language models to create manipulative statements. Then, we analyze their obedience, the persuasion strategies used, and the choice of vocabulary. Based on these experiments, we discuss two actions that can protect us from LLM manipulation. In the long term, we put AI literacy at the forefront, arguing that educating society would minimize the risk of manipulation and its consequences. We also propose an ad hoc solution, a classifier that detects manipulation of LLMs - a Manipulation Fuse.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Cracking Aegis: An Adversarial LLM-based Game for Raising Awareness of Vulnerabilities in Privacy Protection

    cs.HC 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Cracking Aegis, an adversarial LLM-driven dialogue game, led players to use manipulative language strategies and to self-report stronger awareness of privacy vulnerabilities after a single session.

  2. Mind What You Ask For: Emotional and Rational Faces of Persuasion by Large Language Models

    cs.CL 2025-02 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Emotional prompts make LLMs produce more cognitively complex language than rational prompts, and models systematically differ in their use of Cialdini influence principles across prompt types.

Pith tools