Reply to "Comment on "Chiral symmetry restoration, the eigenvalue density of the Dirac operator, and the axial U(1) anomaly at finite temperature""
classification
✦ hep-lat
keywords
commentacknowledgesanalyticanomalyargumentargumentsarticleassumption
read the original abstract
We respond to the comment by Matteo Giordano [1] on our article [2]. We find -- and [1] itself acknowledges -- that the proposed counterexamples intended to refute our argument violate a crucial assumption of QCD at high temperatures, namely that every gluonic observable is an analytic function of the squared quark mass, $m^2$. We further point out a technical mistake found in [1]. We conclude that the arguments presented in [1] are not valid.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.