pith. sign in

arxiv: 1903.05255 · v1 · pith:2HVXOEO3new · submitted 2019-03-12 · 💻 cs.CG · cs.DS

Near-Optimal Algorithms for Shortest Paths in Weighted Unit-Disk Graphs

classification 💻 cs.CG cs.DS
keywords timeproblemvarepsilonweightedalgorithmspacegraphssolved
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

We revisit a classical graph-theoretic problem, the \textit{single-source shortest-path} (SSSP) problem, in weighted unit-disk graphs. We first propose an exact (and deterministic) algorithm which solves the problem in $O(n \log^2 n)$ time using linear space, where $n$ is the number of the vertices of the graph. This significantly improves the previous deterministic algorithm by Cabello and Jej\v{c}i\v{c} [CGTA'15] which uses $O(n^{1+\delta})$ time and $O(n^{1+\delta})$ space (for any small constant $\delta>0$) and the previous randomized algorithm by Kaplan et al. [SODA'17] which uses $O(n \log^{12+o(1)} n)$ expected time and $O(n \log^3 n)$ space. More specifically, we show that if the 2D offline insertion-only (additively-)weighted nearest-neighbor problem with $k$ operations (i.e., insertions and queries) can be solved in $f(k)$ time, then the SSSP problem in weighted unit-disk graphs can be solved in $O(n \log n+f(n))$ time. Using the same framework with some new ideas, we also obtain a $(1+\varepsilon)$-approximate algorithm for the problem, using $O(n \log n + n \log^2(1/\varepsilon))$ time and linear space. This improves the previous $(1+\varepsilon)$-approximate algorithm by Chan and Skrepetos [SoCG'18] which uses $O((1/\varepsilon)^2 n \log n)$ time and $O((1/\varepsilon)^2 n)$ space. More specifically, we show that if the 2D offline insertion-only weighted nearest-neighbor problem with $k_1$ operations in which at most $k_2$ operations are insertions can be solved in $f(k_1,k_2)$ time, then the $(1+\varepsilon)$-approximate SSSP problem in weighted unit-disk graphs can be solved in $O(n \log n+f(n,O(\varepsilon^{-2})))$ time. Because of the $\Omega(n \log n)$-time lower bound of the problem (even when approximation is allowed), both of our algorithms are almost optimal.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.