Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 4 minor 1 cited by

Suppression of Fluid Echoes and Sobolev Stability Threshold for 2D Dissipative Fluid Equations Around Couette Flow

T0 review · 4 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read A single nonlinearity estimate sets Sobolev stability thresholds for sheared fluids.

desk verdict A plausible unifying nonlinear bound improves Boussinesq and MHD thresholds to 1/3, but the vertical MHD case is only sketched and several constants and cross-references need cleanup. read the letter →

arxiv 2505.23391 v1 pith:2JLRBVYC submitted 2025-05-29 math.AP

Niklas Knobel This is my paper
classification math.AP MSC 35Q3576E0576D0576W05
keywords StabilitythresholdCouetteflowEnhanceddissipationFluidechoesBoussinesqequationsMagnetohydrodynamicsTime-dependentFouriermultipliersSobolevspaces
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper studies Couette flow, the simplest shear flow in a channel, and asks how large a perturbation can be before dissipation fails to keep nearby solutions stable. The central claim is that for a broad class of 2D dissipative fluid equations, all nonlinear echo interactions can be bounded by one estimate that loses exactly $\mu^{-1/3}$ in the dissipation parameter, with only a logarithmic correction in the borderline case. If that estimate holds, nonlinear stability follows from linear stability, and the paper obtains Sobolev thresholds $\mu^{1/3}$ for Boussinesq around Couette flow with large affine temperature and $\mu^{1/3}|\ln\mu|^{-(1+r)}$ for MHD around Couette flow with constant magnetic field. The Navier-Stokes threshold $\mu^{1/3}$ is recovered as a special case.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the time-dependent Fourier multiplier $A(k,\eta)=\langle k,\eta\rangle^N e^{c\mu^{1/3}t\mathbf{1}_{k\neq 0}}m^{-1}(k,\eta)$, with $m=m_\gamma M_L M_\mu$ and $N\ge 12$. The factor $m_\gamma$ is the new construction: it exponentiates a sum of resonance kernels $g_\gamma(s)\sim\langle s\rangle^{-1-\gamma}$ for $\gamma>0$, and $g_0(s)\sim\langle s\rangle^{-1}|\ln(1+\langle s\rangle)|^{-1-r}$ for $\gamma=0$, each weighted by $\min(1,t\mu^{1/3})$. This weight suppresses the reaction and transport terms that produce fluid echoes, while the enhanced-dissipation weight $M_\mu$ obeys $\partial_t M_\mu/M_\mu = c^{-1}\mu^{1/3}(1+\mu^{2/3}|t-\eta/k|^2)^{-1}$ and provides the damping rate. The admissible linear weight $M_L$ supplies commutator estimates that close the bootstrap. The proof of the main bound splits the nonlinearity into reaction, transport, remainder, and average terms; the transport term is the one that demands the extra logarithmic factor at $\gamma=0$.

What would settle it

Evaluate Lemma 3.1(vi) numerically at a transport-set pair, for instance $\gamma=0$, $k=1$, $l=2$, $\eta=t$, $\xi=2t$, $r=1$, and several $\mu$ down to $10^{-12}$, checking whether $|m_0(k,\eta)-m_0(l,\xi)|$ remains bounded by $\langle k-l,\eta-\xi\rangle\langle l\rangle^{-1}+\xi\langle l\rangle^{-2}|k-l|^3(|\ln\mu|^{2}\partial_t m_0/m_0(k,\eta)+\mu)$ with a constant uniform in $\mu$. A computed pair where the ratio grows like a power of $|\ln\mu|$ would break the transport-term estimate and with it the $\gamma=0$ case of Theorem 2.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On its own terms, the paper's central result is Theorem 2: under bootstrap bounds on weighted $L^2$ norms of two transported quantities $f_1,f_2$ and a stream-type quantity $q$, the main nonlinearity $NL^{\gamma}_{f_1,f_2,q}$ obeys $\int_1^t NL^{\gamma}\,d\tau \le \tilde C_\gamma \mu^{-1/3}\varepsilon_f^2\varepsilon_q$ for $\gamma>0$, while for $\gamma=0$ the same integral is bounded by $\tilde C_0|\ln\mu|^{1+r}\mu^{-1/3}\varepsilon_f^2\varepsilon_q$. This single estimate is what allows nonlinear stability to be reduced to a linear analysis. The paper applies it to prove the Boussinesq threshold $\mu^{1/3}$ for large affine temperature profiles and the MHD threshold $\mu^{1/3}|\ln\mu|^{-(1+r)}$ for constant magnetic fields, in both cases with decay $e^{-c\mu^{1/3}t}$.

Load-bearing premise

The argument hinges on a pointwise multiplier inequality for the new weight, Lemma 3.1(vi), especially for $\gamma=0$: the difference $|m_\gamma(k,\eta)-m_\gamma(l,\xi)|$ must be controlled on the transport and remainder frequency sets by a combination of the frequency ratio, the weight's own time derivative, and a logarithmic loss. If that inequality fails on any admissible frequency pair, the master bound (4) collapses.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • For any of the systems whose leading nonlinearity matches the $\gamma>0$ structure, the Sobolev threshold is $\mu^{1/3}$ with no logarithmic loss; this is realized here by Navier-Stokes ($\gamma=1$) and Boussinesq ($\gamma=\tilde\gamma=1/2$).
  • At $\gamma=0$, the threshold carries an extra factor $|\ln\mu|^{-(1+r)}$, which is why the MHD result is stated as $1/3^+$ rather than $1/3$.
  • The Boussinesq result covers affine temperature profiles $\beta^2y$ with $\beta>1/2$ and gives $\langle t\rangle^{1/2}$ decay for horizontal velocity and temperature and $\langle t\rangle^{3/2}$ for vertical velocity.
  • The MHD result covers constant magnetic fields with a vertical component for arbitrary $\nu,\kappa$, and horizontal fields in the range $\nu^3\le\kappa\le\nu^{1/3}$.
  • Stability is obtained in Sobolev spaces with $N\ge13$, with quantitative rates uniform in the dissipation, so the threshold statement is meaningful in the vanishing-dissipation limit.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The resonance-weight construction suggests a general template: for any shear flow whose main obstruction is an echo chain, one can build the stabilizing weight from the resonance kernel $g_\gamma$ rather than from equation-specific structure; the paper applies this template to three equations, and the same template may transfer to other dissipative perturbations of shear flows.
  • The power $\mu^{-1/3}$ is independent of $\gamma$, while only the logarithmic factor depends on $\gamma$. A natural conjecture, not made in the paper, is that $\mu^{1/3}$ (with possible log losses) is the universal Sobolev threshold for 2D dissipative shear-stabilized systems of this type.
  • The paper proves upper bounds only. A lower-bound construction, exhibiting instability for initial data of size comparable to $\mu^{1/3}$, would be needed to show optimality; the paper does not attempt this.
  • A direct extension would be to test the bound on forced systems or on non-affine shear profiles; if the $\mu^{-1/3}$ loss persists there, the threshold picture would reach beyond Couette flow.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper develops a general a priori estimate for the main nonlinear interaction in a class of 2D dissipative fluid equations around Couette flow. The central result, Theorem 2, asserts that if the bootstrap bounds (3) hold for the weighted unknowns, then the nonlinearity NL^γ satisfies the bounds (4): C̃_γ μ^{-1/3} ε_f^2 ε_q for γ>0 and C̃_0 |ln μ|^{1+r} μ^{-1/3} ε_f^2 ε_q for γ=0. The proof is based on time-dependent Fourier multipliers, a new resonance weight m_γ, and a decomposition into reaction, transport, remainder, and average terms. The theorem is then applied to Navier-Stokes (γ=1), Boussinesq with a large affine temperature profile (γ=1/2), and MHD with horizontal or vertical constant magnetic fields (γ=0), yielding thresholds μ^{1/3} and μ^{1/3}|ln μ|^{-(1+r)}.

Significance. If Theorem 2 is correct, this is a significant contribution: it gives a unified, non-fitted derivation of the μ^{1/3} threshold mechanism, recovers the known Navier-Stokes threshold, improves the previous Boussinesq threshold from 1/2 to 1/3, and improves the 2D MHD threshold to 1/3^+ while including vertical magnetic fields. The explicit construction of the weights and the careful frequency decompositions are genuine strengths, and the applications are structured so that the linear analysis is clearly separated from the nonlinear estimate. The main risks are the delicate γ=0 case of Lemma 3.1(vi), on which the MHD threshold rests, and the incompletely written vertical-field MHD proof.

major comments (4)
  1. [Section 6.2] The proof of the vertical magnetic field case is incomplete at the point where, after equation (42), the nonlinear estimates are dismissed with the sentence 'The main nonlinear and lower nonlinear terms work the same as in the case of constant magnetic field'. This is load-bearing: Theorem 1 explicitly advertises α2≠0 as part of the new MHD result, and the vertical case introduces a different adapted velocity with div_t(˜v)≠0 and additional linear terms. The bootstrap reduction to Theorem 2 requires that the analogues of Lemma 6.2 and the bounds (39)-(41) be actually proved for the system (42), not merely asserted. Please supply the missing estimates or restrict the theorem to the horizontal case with the stated ν,κ condition.
  2. [Section 5] The constant c in the Boussinesq argument is stated inconsistently. In the definition after (22) it is c = 1/4(1 - 1/(4β)), while the proof of Lemma 5.1 uses 'since c = 1/4(1 - 1/(2β))'. The displayed inequality immediately before this line also contains a malformed term, reading '− 2(1− 1/2β )∥...∥', which appears to be missing a parenthesis and the correct quadratic structure. Because the positivity of the energy and the β>1/2 restriction in Theorem 3 depend on this constant, the correct definition and the resulting inequality must be written out carefully.
  3. [Section 3.2 and Section 4.2] The γ=0 case of Lemma 3.1(vi) is the cornerstone of the MHD threshold, as it feeds directly into the T_m bound in Section 4.2. The proof at the end of Section 3.2 is a multi-case calculation whose decisive step is the cancellation of the prefactor min(1,t μ^{1/3}) in (13) against the reciprocal factor introduced after the inequality 1/<s> ≲ |ln μ|^{1+r}/(<s> |ln(1+<s>)|^{1+r}) + μ. In the current presentation this cancellation is not displayed with all constants and support conditions; if any of the intervening inequalities loses a power μ^{-θ}, the master bound (4) for γ=0 would gain a positive power of μ^{-1/3} and the advertised MHD threshold would be destroyed. Please rewrite the γ=0 calculation in full detail so that this cancellation can be checked explicitly.
  4. [Lemma 3.1(vi) and Section 4.2 (T_m)] The statement of Lemma 3.1(vi) is not meaningful for k=0, since it contains the factors 1/<k> and η/<k>^2, yet k=0 can occur in the transport set S_T. In the bound on T_m in Section 4.2 the lemma is silently applied with the roles of (k,η) and (l,ξ) swapped, which is why the displayed formula uses <l> and ξ. Please state the lemma in the symmetric form actually used, and explain how the k=0 case is covered (for instance by property (iv) or by the swapped version).
minor comments (4)
  1. [Section 3.1] The same symbol S_R is used for the reaction set in (6) and for the remainder set in (8); this makes the decomposition in Section 4 hard to follow. Please use distinct notations, for example S_R^react and S_R^rem.
  2. [Section 4.2] In the first displayed estimate of the transport term, the low-frequency factor appears as |Λ^2 q|(k-l,η-ξ), whereas the original Plancherel decomposition has |q|(k-l,η-ξ). Please explain which two derivatives are absorbed into the Λ^2 notation, or remove the Λ^2 if it is a typo.
  3. [After equation (15)] In the proof of Lemma 3.1(vi), the displayed chain after (15) contains the unclear factor '|k−l|4'; as written it is inconsistent with the statement of the lemma, which requires a factor |k−l|^3 in the second term. Please correct this typo and verify the displayed chain.
  4. [Appendix B, proof of Lemma 3.2] The estimate is written as 'By |e|x|− 1|≤| x|e|x|', but the notation should be |e^x − 1| ≤ |x| e^{|x|}. This is only a notational issue, but it should be corrected for readability.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: Theorem 2 is proved from explicit weight constructions; self-citations are background only.

full rationale

The central result, Theorem 2, is an a priori nonlinear estimate proved from first principles: the weights m_gamma, M_mu, and M_L are defined explicitly in Section 3, and their necessary properties are proved in Lemmas 3.1, 3.2, 5.2, and 6.1 rather than imported as black boxes. The bootstrap hypotheses (3) are genuine assumptions on arbitrary functions, not disguised versions of the desired conclusion; the proof then derives a nonlinear bound in terms of epsilon_f and epsilon_q, and the applications to Boussinesq, MHD, and Navier-Stokes invoke Theorem 2 directly to close their own energy estimates. I checked each circularity pattern: there is no fitted parameter later called a prediction, no uniqueness theorem invoked from the author's prior work to force a choice, no ansatz smuggled in via citation, and no known empirical result merely renamed. The author's self-citations, such as the mention that m_gamma is 'motivated by the weight m in [DKZ24]' and the adapted velocity in the MHD section being 'cf. [Kno24a]', are contextual or motivational; the actual definitions and estimates are carried out in this paper, so these citations are not load-bearing. The delicate pointwise estimates in Lemma 3.1(vi) are a correctness risk for the gamma = 0 threshold, but a possible technical gap or an unproven estimate is not the same as circularity: the lemma is proved from the explicit definition of m_gamma and does not assume the conclusion of Theorem 2. The paper is self-contained against the stated goal, and the thresholds are derived from the estimate rather than built into it.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The proof relies on standard Fourier and energy tools, a small number of domain assumptions, and specially designed weights. No physical entities are introduced; the new objects are mathematical weights and adapted variables. Constants such as c and c2 are hand-chosen proof parameters and do not affect the scaling exponents.

free parameters (3)
  • Boussinesq weight constant c = c = 1/4(1 - 1/(2β)) (equation (22) prints 1/(4β))
    Hand-chosen so the cross-term in the energy E is controlled; it only affects constants, not the μ^{1/3} scaling.
  • MHD vertical-field weight constant c2 = c2 = 1/(10 max(1, α2))
    Hand-chosen small to absorb linear terms in the bootstrap; it does not alter the threshold exponent.
  • Resonance weight constant c in gγ(s) = universal constant (unspecified)
    Selects the size of the resonance weight in (5); it is independent of μ and affects only the constants in (4).
assumptions (4)
  • standard math Plancherel theorem and Fourier multiplier calculus on T × R.
    Used throughout Section 4 to convert commutator estimates into frequency sums.
  • domain assumption Local well-posedness and continuation of solutions to the dissipative systems (1) in H^N for N ≥ 12.
    Used implicitly in Sections 5 and 6 to turn a priori bootstrap estimates into global existence statements; not proved in this paper and standard for these parabolic-type systems.
  • ad hoc to paper The adapted linear variables and linear weights capture the linear dynamics in the sense stated in Step 1 of the introduction.
    This is a constructed structure tailored to each application; the paper verifies the resulting equations directly, but the choice is motivated by prior echo heuristics.
  • domain assumption The domain restrictions used in the applications: β > 1/2 for the Boussinesq affine temperature and either α2 ≠ 0 or κ^3 ≤ ν ≤ κ^{1/3} for MHD.
    These restrictions are stated in Theorems 3 and 4 and are used to make the energy and linear weights coercive; without them the stated thresholds are not proved.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Suppression of Fluid Echoes and Sobolev Stability Threshold for 2D Dissipative Fluid Equations Around Couette Flow." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/2JLRBVYC

@misc{pith2026250523391,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Suppression of Fluid Echoes and Sobolev Stability Threshold for 2D Dissipative Fluid Equations Around Couette Flow},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/2JLRBVYC}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2505.23391}
}
abstract

We study the Sobolev stability thresholds of 2d dissipative fluid equations around Couette flow on the domain $\mathbb T\times \mathbb R$. We prove a bound for general nonlinear interactions, which, for several fluid equations, reduces the proof of nonlinear stability to a linear stability analysis. We apply this approach to the examples of Navier-Stokes, Boussinesq and magnetohydrodynamic equations around Couette flow. This improves the Sobolev stability threshold for the Boussinesq equations around Couette flow and large affine temperature to $1/3$ and for the MHD equations around Couette flow and constant magnetic field to $1/3^+$.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Transition threshold of Couette flow for 2D Boussinesq equations

    math.AP 2025-06 accept novelty 6.0 of 10

    The stability threshold α=1/3 for 2D Boussinesq-Couette flow holds for unequal viscosity and thermal diffusivity, with H^{s+1/2} regularity for s>3/2.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

33 extracted references · 32 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    Nonlinear inviscid damping and shear-buoyancy instability in the two-dimensional B oussinesq equations

    Jacob Bedrossian, Roberta Bianchini, Michele Coti Zelati, and Michele Dolce. Nonlinear inviscid damping and shear-buoyancy instability in the two-dimensional B oussinesq equations. Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics , 76(12):3685--3768, 2023

    work page 2023

  2. [2]

    On the stability threshold for the 3 D C ouette flow in S obolev regularity

    Jacob Bedrossian, Pierre Germain, and Nader Masmoudi. On the stability threshold for the 3 D C ouette flow in S obolev regularity. Annals of Mathematics , pages 541--608, 2017

    work page 2017

  3. [3]

    Inviscid damping and the asymptotic stability of planar shear flows in the 2 D E uler equations

    Jacob Bedrossian and Nader Masmoudi. Inviscid damping and the asymptotic stability of planar shear flows in the 2 D E uler equations. Publ. Math. Inst. Hautes \'Etudes Sci. , 122:195--300, 2015

    work page 2015

  4. [4]

    Inviscid damping and the asymptotic stability of planar shear flows in the 2d E uler equations

    Jacob Bedrossian and Nader Masmoudi. Inviscid damping and the asymptotic stability of planar shear flows in the 2d E uler equations. Publications math \'e matiques de l'IH \'E S , 122(1):195--300, 2015

    work page 2015

  5. [5]

    Enhanced dissipation and inviscid damping in the inviscid limit of the N avier- S tokes equations near the 2D C ouette flow

    Jacob Bedrossian, Nader Masmoudi, and Vlad Vicol. Enhanced dissipation and inviscid damping in the inviscid limit of the N avier- S tokes equations near the 2D C ouette flow. Archive for Rational Mechanics and Analysis , 219:1087--1159, 2016

    work page 2016

  6. [6]

    Large norm inflation of the current in the viscous, non-resistive magnetohydrodynamics equations

    Michele Dolce, Niklas Knobel, and Christian Zillinger. L arge norm inflation of the current in the viscous, non-resistive magnetohydrodynamics equations. arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.22804 , 2024

    work page Pith review arXiv 2024

  7. [7]

    Long-time instability of the C ouette flow in low G evrey spaces

    Yu Deng and Nader Masmoudi. Long-time instability of the C ouette flow in low G evrey spaces. Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics , 2023

    work page 2023

  8. [8]

    Stability threshold of the 2D C ouette flow in a homogeneous magnetic field using symmetric variables

    Michele Dolce. Stability threshold of the 2D C ouette flow in a homogeneous magnetic field using symmetric variables. Communications in Mathematical Physics , 405(4):94, 2024

    work page 2024

Show all 33 references
  1. [9]

    Echo chains as a linear mechanism: Norm inflation, modified exponents and asymptotics

    Yu Deng and Christian Zillinger. Echo chains as a linear mechanism: Norm inflation, modified exponents and asymptotics. Archive for rational mechanics and analysis , 242(1):643--700, 2021

    2021

  2. [10]

    Stability threshold of couette flow for 2D MHD equations in the S obolev space

    Jiakun Jin, Xiaoxia Ren, and Dongyi Wei. Stability threshold of couette flow for 2D MHD equations in the S obolev space. Nonlinearity , 38(5):055009, 2025

    2025

  3. [11]

    Ideal M agnetohydrodynamics A round C ouette F low: L ong T ime S tability and V orticity- C urrent I nstability

    Niklas Knobel. Ideal M agnetohydrodynamics A round C ouette F low: L ong T ime S tability and V orticity- C urrent I nstability. arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.21835 , 2024

    2024 arXiv

  4. [12]

    S obolev stability for the 2D MHD equations in the non-resistive limit

    Niklas Knobel. S obolev stability for the 2D MHD equations in the non-resistive limit. arXiv preprint arXiv:2401.12548 , 2024

    2024 arXiv

  5. [13]

    On echoes in magnetohydrodynamics with magnetic dissipation

    Niklas Knobel and Christian Zillinger. On echoes in magnetohydrodynamics with magnetic dissipation. Journal of Differential Equations , 367:625--688, 2023

    2023

  6. [14]

    On the S obolev stability threshold for the 2D MHD equations with horizontal magnetic dissipation

    Niklas Knobel and Christian Zillinger. On the S obolev stability threshold for the 2D MHD equations with horizontal magnetic dissipation. Journal of Nonlinear Science , 35(3):1--36, 2025

    2025

  7. [15]

    On the S obolev stability threshold of 3D C ouette flow in a uniform magnetic field

    Kyle Liss. On the S obolev stability threshold of 3D C ouette flow in a uniform magnetic field. Communications in Mathematical Physics , pages 1--50, 2020

    2020

  8. [16]

    Asymptotic stability of two-dimensional C ouette flow in a viscous fluid

    Hui Li, Nader Masmoudi, and Weiren Zhao. Asymptotic stability of two-dimensional C ouette flow in a viscous fluid. arXiv preprint arXiv:2208.14898 , 2022

    2022 arXiv

  9. [17]

    Stability of C ouette flow for 2D B oussinesq system without thermal diffusivity

    Nader Masmoudi, Belkacem Said-Houari, and Weiren Zhao. Stability of C ouette flow for 2D B oussinesq system without thermal diffusivity. Archive for Rational Mechanics and Analysis , 245(2):645--752, 2022

    2022

  10. [18]

    Stability threshold of two-dimensional C ouette flow in S obolev spaces

    Nader Masmoudi and Weiren Zhao. Stability threshold of two-dimensional C ouette flow in S obolev spaces. Ann. Inst. H. Poincar \'e C Anal. Non Lin \'e aire , 39(2):245--325, 2022

    2022

  11. [19]

    Asymptotic stability for two-dimensional B oussinesq systems around the C ouette flow in a finite channel

    Nader Masmoudi, Cuili Zhai, and Weiren Zhao. Asymptotic stability for two-dimensional B oussinesq systems around the C ouette flow in a finite channel. Journal of Functional Analysis , 284(1):109736, 2023

    2023

  12. [20]

    Improved stability threshold of the T wo- D imensional C ouette flow for N avier- S tokes- B oussinesq S ystems via quasi-linearization

    Binqian Niu and Weiren Zhao. Improved stability threshold of the T wo- D imensional C ouette flow for N avier- S tokes- B oussinesq S ystems via quasi-linearization. arXiv preprint arXiv:2409.16216 , 2024

    2024 arXiv

  13. [21]

    Osborne Reynolds. Xxix. an experimental investigation of the circumstances which determine whether the motion of water shall be direct or sinuous, and of the law of resistance in parallel channels. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal society of London , 174:935--982, 1883

  14. [22]

    Stability threshold of C ouette flow for the 3D MHD equations

    Yulin Rao, Zhifei Zhang, and Ruizhao Zi. Stability threshold of C ouette flow for the 3D MHD equations. Journal of Functional Analysis , 288(5):110796, 2025

    2025

  15. [23]

    Stability and transition in shear flows

    Peter J Schmid, Dan S Henningson, and DF Jankowski. Stability and transition in shear flows. applied mathematical sciences, vol. 142. Appl. Mech. Rev. , 55(3):B57--B59, 2002

    2002

  16. [24]

    The stability threshold for 3D MHD equations around C ouette with rationally aligned magnetic field

    Fei Wang, Lingda Xu, and Zeren Zhang. The stability threshold for 3D MHD equations around C ouette with rationally aligned magnetic field. arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.19822 , 2025

    2025 arXiv

  17. [25]

    Nonlinear enhanced dissipation and inviscid damping for the 2D C ouette flow

    Dongyi Wei and Zhifei Zhang. Nonlinear enhanced dissipation and inviscid damping for the 2D C ouette flow. Tunisian Journal of Mathematics , 5(3):573--592, 2023

    2023

  18. [26]

    The stability threshold for 2D MHD equations around C ouette with general viscosity and magnetic resistivity

    Fei Wang and Zeren Zhang. The stability threshold for 2D MHD equations around C ouette with general viscosity and magnetic resistivity. arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.20404 , 2024

    2024 arXiv

  19. [27]

    Linear inviscid damping for C ouette flow in stratified fluid

    Jincheng Yang and Zhiwu Lin. Linear inviscid damping for C ouette flow in stratified fluid. Journal of Mathematical Fluid Mechanics , 20(2):445--472, 2018

    2018

  20. [28]

    On enhanced dissipation for the B oussinesq equations

    Christian Zillinger. On enhanced dissipation for the B oussinesq equations. Journal of Differential Equations , 282:407--445, 2021

    2021

  21. [29]

    On the B oussinesq equations with non-monotone temperature profiles

    Christian Zillinger. On the B oussinesq equations with non-monotone temperature profiles. Journal of Nonlinear Science , 31(4):64, 2021

    2021

  22. [30]

    On echo chains in the linearized B oussinesq equations around traveling waves

    Christian Zillinger. On echo chains in the linearized B oussinesq equations around traveling waves. SIAM Journal on Mathematical Analysis , 55(5):5127--5188, 2023

    2023

  23. [31]

    Stability threshold of the C ouette flow for N avier-- S tokes B oussinesq system with L arge R ichardson number

    Cuili Zhai and Weiren Zhao. Stability threshold of the C ouette flow for N avier-- S tokes B oussinesq system with L arge R ichardson number. SIAM Journal on Mathematical Analysis , 55(2):1284--1318, 2023

    2023

  24. [32]

    Stability threshold of C ouette flow for 2D B oussinesq equations in S obolev spaces

    Zhifei Zhang and Ruizhao Zi. Stability threshold of C ouette flow for 2D B oussinesq equations in S obolev spaces. Journal de Math \'e matiques Pures et Appliqu \'e es , 179:123--182, 2023

    2023

  25. [33]

    Asymptotic stability of C ouette flow in a strong uniform magnetic field for the E uler- MHD system

    Weiren Zhao and Ruizhao Zi. Asymptotic stability of C ouette flow in a strong uniform magnetic field for the E uler- MHD system. Archive for Rational Mechanics and Analysis , 248(3):47, 2024

    2024

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.