The reviewed record of science sign in
Pith

arxiv: 2607.05166 · v1 · pith:2JRGAP32 · submitted 2026-07-06 · math.AP

Stability of vertically charged steady magnetic field in 3D incompressible magneto-micropolar fluids without magnetic and angular viscosity in a strip domain

Zefu Feng , Guangyi Hong , Jiahong Wu , Kun Zhao This is my paper

Reviewed by Pith T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 kernel 2026-07-08 01:20 UTCglm-5.2pith:2JRGAP32record.jsonopen to challenge →

classification math.AP
keywords magneticglobalmagneto-micropolarangularfieldsteadydatadomain
0
0 comments X

The pith

Vertically charged magnetic field stabilizes 3D micropolar fluid

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper studies the 3D incompressible magneto-micropolar equations in a strip domain when both magnetic diffusion and angular viscosity are set to zero. Under these conditions, standard small-data global well-posedness is impossible because the magnetic field has no dissipation mechanism and its Sobolev norms grow without bound. The authors show that a constant background magnetic field oriented perpendicular to the horizontal boundary acts as a stabilizing equilibrium: any sufficiently small perturbation around this steady state produces a unique global classical solution, and the perturbation decays back to equilibrium at an almost exponential rate. The proof works by reformulating the equations in Lagrangian coordinates, which absorbs nonlinear transport terms into time derivatives and exposes a wave-like structure in the momentum equation via the term ∂²₃η. The central technical challenge is the antisotropic coupling between fluid velocity and angular velocity through curl operators, which causes a derivative loss. The authors resolve this by applying the Helmholtz projection to decouple the pressure, deriving anisotropic estimates on the projected curl of the angular velocity field, and building a two-tier energy functional that controls the solution at two different regularity levels simultaneously.

Core claim

The authors prove that for the 3D incompressible magneto-micropolar system with zero magnetic and angular viscosity in a strip domain, a vertically oriented constant magnetic field is a stable equilibrium. Specifically, if the initial perturbation is sufficiently small in a high-order Sobolev norm (with the regularity index N ≥ 4), then there exists a unique global classical solution whose energy remains bounded by the initial data for all time, and the perturbation decays to zero at a rate of (1+t)^{4−2N}. This is the first global well-posedness and stability result for this system under these physical conditions.

What carries the argument

The Lagrangian coordinate reformulation reduces the magnetic field to b = e₃ + ∂₃η, which produces the wave-structure term ∂²₃η in the momentum equation. The Helmholtz projection P eliminates pressure from the velocity equation, yielding a projected coupled system for Q = P(∂²₃η) and V = P(∇×w). A novel anisotropic estimate (Lemma 3.2) controls the horizontal gradient of the potential ϕ in the Helmholtz decomposition of ∇×w by its vertical derivative and a small multiple of the full curl, enabling recovery of w from its projection. Elliptic estimates for u are derived through the vorticity equation of w rather than the Stokes system, breaking a circular dependency. The two-tier energy method

Load-bearing premise

The background magnetic field must be exactly perpendicular to the horizontal boundary (b₀ = e₃). This specific orientation is what allows the reduction b = e₃ + ∂₃η and generates the ∂²₃η wave structure in the momentum equation. The authors note results may hold for non-perpendicular fields but the proof does not extend to that case. Additionally, the entire argument requires an a priori smallness assumption on the solution norm to control the Lagrangian coordinate perturb

What would settle it

If one could exhibit initial data arbitrarily close to the vertical steady field for which the solution develops a singularity in finite time, the theorem would fail. More concretely, if the derivative-loss mechanism from the antisotropic curl coupling between u and w cannot be compensated by the magnetic stabilizing term ∂²₃η at the energy level the authors claim, the energy closure would break down.

read the original abstract

This paper intends to understand the regularity and stability problem on the 3D incompressible magneto-micropolar equations with zero magnetic and angular viscosities in a strip domain. The magneto-micropolar system models the electrically conducting micropolar fluid in the presence of a magnetic field. The lack of magnetic diffusion and angular dissipation makes it impossible to prove even small data global well-posedness result, let alone general large data global regularity. This paper presents a steady-state setup around which any perturbations can be shown to be globally regular and stable. More precisely, any small perturbation near a steady magnetic field perpendicular to the horizontal boundary leads to a unique global classical solution. In addition, the solution is shown to converge to the steady state at an almost exponential rate as time goes to infinity. These appear to be the very first rigorous global results on the magneto-micropolar equations concerned here.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. This paper studies the global regularity and stability of the 3D incompressible magneto-micropolar equations with zero magnetic and angular viscosity in a strip domain. The authors consider perturbations near a steady magnetic field perpendicular to the horizontal boundary. By reformulating the system in Lagrangian coordinates, the background field b_0 = e_3 allows the reduction b = e_3 + ∂_3η, which introduces a wave-like structure ∂²₃η in the momentum equation. The proof employs the two-tier energy method of Guo-Tice, combined with a novel use of the Helmholtz projection to handle the coupling between the fluid velocity u and the angular velocity w. The main result (Theorem 2.1) establishes that sufficiently small perturbations yield a unique global classical solution with an almost exponential decay rate (1+t)^{4-2N} for N ≥ 4.

Significance. This appears to be the first rigorous global well-posedness and stability result for the 3D incompressible magneto-micropolar system without magnetic and angular viscosity. The key technical innovation is the use of the Helmholtz projection to decompose ∇×w and recover estimates on w via the anisotropic estimates of Lemma 3.2, which is necessitated by the incompressible pressure structure differing from the compressible case in [11]. The result provides a falsifiable prediction: stability holds specifically when the background field is perpendicular to the boundary. The energy scheme is extensive, spanning non-spatial, horizontal, and vertical derivative estimates, synthesized through an inductive argument in Section 6.

major comments (3)
  1. §6, Step 7 (transition from (6.45)–(6.46) to (6.47)): The inductive scheme in Steps 5–7 proceeds downward in k from k=2n−1 to k=0, absorbing lower-order W terms at each step. At the final step, (6.46) takes k=0 in (6.29) and absorbs ∥∂_t^l W∥²_{0,2n−1} from the right side of (6.45). However, (6.29) at k=0 contains the term σ∑_l ∥∂_t^l W∥²_{0,2n−1} on its right side (inherited from (6.23)–(6.24)), and the text states 'provided σ is suitably small' without explicitly verifying that a single σ > 0 works simultaneously across all 2n−1 inductive steps. Since the anisotropic estimate (3.11) produces a σ that depends on k and λ, one needs to confirm that the σ selected at each inductive step (k=2n−1,...,1) is compatible with the σ required for the final absorption at k=0. Please add a remark or a brief argument clarifying that a uniform σ > 0 suffices across all steps, or adjust the induction.
  2. §6, (6.29): The right-hand side of (6.29) contains the term ∑_l ∥∂_t^l w∥²_{0,2n}, which is of the same or higher order than the dissipation terms on the left. This term is carried through the inductive chain (6.38)–(6.45) and ultimately absorbed in (6.47) via reference to (5.6) and (5.25). The absorption of a 0,2n-norm quantity by ¯D*_n and ¯D♯_n should be made more explicit, as it is load-bearing for the closure of the dissipation estimate (6.47) that feeds into Lemma 7.2.
  3. §1.2, Remark 2.2: The reduction b = e_3 + ∂_3η and the resulting wave structure ∂²₃η in (1.7b) critically depend on b_0 = e_3 being perpendicular to the boundary. The remark that results 'may still hold true' for non-perpendicular fields is speculative. While this does not affect the correctness of the current result, the authors should clarify whether the perpendicularity is used only for the reduction (1.6)–(1.7b) or also more structurally in the anisotropic estimates of Lemma 3.2, which rely on the strip geometry.
minor comments (5)
  1. §2, (2.5): The definition of G_{2N}(t) involves the parameter θ > 0, but the constraint on θ (namely N−2 ≥ 1+θ) is only stated later in the proof of Lemma 7.4. It would help the reader to note this constraint when θ is first introduced.
  2. §3.2, Lemma 3.2: The proof uses frequency localization into |ξ| ≤ 1 and |ξ| ≫ 1 regimes, but the intermediate regime 1 < |ξ| < K̄ is not explicitly discussed. A brief remark that the low-frequency estimate (3.13) extends to any finite K would improve clarity.
  3. §5.1, Lemma 5.1: The proof is omitted with reference to 'similar arguments as in the proof of Lemma 4.2.' Given that this lemma is used at multiple critical points (n=2N and n=N+2), a slightly more detailed sketch, particularly for the highest-order terms in (5.3), would be beneficial.
  4. Typographical: In (6.3a), the equation reads '(µ+ζ)∂_t Q + Q + ζV = H'. The coefficient (µ+ζ) on ∂_t Q appears unusual given the structure of (6.3b); please verify this is correct and not a typo for the time derivative coefficient.
  5. §7, Lemma 7.1, (7.1): The term (E_n)² appears on the right side. The text explains this arises from X_n ≲ (E_n)² via (5.2), but the mechanism by which a quadratic term in the energy arises from the perturbation estimates could be stated more explicitly.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for a careful reading and for identifying three substantive points, all of which concern the closure of the energy scheme in Section 6. We address each point below. In brief: (1) we agree that the uniformity of σ across the inductive steps should be made explicit and will add a remark; (2) we agree that the absorption of the ∑_l ∥∂_t^l w∥²_{0,2n} term in (6.47) deserves a more transparent justification and will expand the text accordingly; (3) we will clarify the role of perpendicularity. No standing objections remain.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: §6, Step 7 (transition from (6.45)–(6.46) to (6.47)): The inductive scheme in Steps 5–7 proceeds downward in k from k=2n−1 to k=0, absorbing lower-order W terms at each step. At the final step, (6.46) takes k=0 in (6.29) and absorbs ∥∂_t^l W∥²_{0,2n−1} from the right side of (6.45). However, (6.29) at k=0 contains the term σ∑_l ∥∂_t^l W∥²_{0,2n−1} on its right side (inherited from (6.23)–(6.24)), and the text states 'provided σ is suitably small' without explicitly verifying that a single σ > 0 works simultaneously across all 2n−1 inductive steps. Since the anisotropic estimate (3.11) produces a σ that depends on k and λ, one needs to confirm that the σ selected at each inductive step (k=2n−1,...,1) is compatible with the σ required for the final absorption at k=0. Please add a remark or a brief argument clarifying that a uniform σ > 0 suffices across all steps, or adjust the induction.

    Authors: We agree that this point deserves explicit clarification. The key observation is that the σ appearing in (6.23)–(6.24) and hence in (6.29) is the same parameter σ > 0 from Lemma 3.2, which is arbitrary (the lemma holds 'for any σ > 0'). At each inductive step k = 2n−1, 2n−2, ..., 1, the term σ∑_l ∥∂_t^l W∥²_{0,2n−1} on the right side of (6.29) is absorbed by the corresponding term ∑_l ∥∂_t^l W∥²_{k,2n−k−1} on the left side of the estimate at the next lower k, since ∥·∥_{k,2n−k−1} ≥ ∥·∥_{0,2n−1} for k ≥ 1. The crucial point is that the same σ > 0 appears at every step (it is not re-selected), and the absorption at each intermediate step is exact (no smallness of σ is needed—only the final absorption at k = 0 requires σ to be small relative to the dissipation on the left of (6.46)). More precisely: at each intermediate step, the term σ∑_l ∥∂_t^l W∥²_{0,2n−1} is bounded by σ∑_l ∥∂_t^l W∥²_{k−1,2n−k}, which is part of the dissipation on the left side of the estimate at level k−1, and is absorbed there regardless of the size of σ (it is a subset of the left-side dissipation). Only at the final step (k = 0, equation (6.46)) do we need σ sufficiently small so that σ∑_l ∥∂_t^l W∥²_{0,2n−1} can be absorbed by the full dissipation ∑_l ∥∂_t^l W∥²_{0,2n−1} on the left of (6.46). Since the lemma provides the estimate for any σ > 0, we simply choose σ small enough at the outset. We will add a remark to this effect in the revision. revision: yes

  2. Referee: §6, (6.29): The right-hand side of (6.29) contains the term ∑_l ∥∂_t^l w∥²_{0,2n}, which is of the same or higher order than the dissipation terms on the left. This term is carried through the inductive chain (6.38)–(6.45) and ultimately absorbed in (6.47) via reference to (5.6) and (5.25). The absorption of a 0,2n-norm quantity by ¯D*_n and ¯D♯_n should be made more explicit, as it is load-bearing for the closure of the dissipation estimate (6.47) that feeds into Lemma 7.2.

    Authors: The referee is correct that this absorption is load-bearing and should be made more explicit. We trace the argument as follows. The term ∑_l ∥∂_t^l w∥²_{0,2n} on the right side of (6.29) arises from the Hodge estimate (6.28), specifically from the term ∑_l ∥∂_t^l w∥²_{0,2n} in (6.28), which is the lower-order remainder in the div-curl decomposition. By the definition of the anisotropic norm (2.1), ∥∂_t^l w∥²_{0,2n} = ∑_{α₁+α₂≤2n} ∥∂₁^{α₁}∂₂^{α₂} ∂_t^l w∥²₀. For l = 0, this is ∥w∥²_{0,2n}, which is contained in ¯E*_n (see (5.5)) and its dissipation ∥w∥²_{1,2n} is contained in ¯D*_n (see (5.6)). For l ≥ 1, ∥∂_t^l w∥²_{0,2n} is contained in ¯E*_n and ∥∂_t^l w∥²_{1,2n} in ¯D*_n as well (the sum in (5.5)–(5.6) runs over j = 0, ..., n−1 with ∥∂_t^j w∥²_{0,2n−2j}, and for l ≤ n−1 we have 2n−2l ≥ 2n only when l = 0; for l ≥ 1, 2n−2l ≤ 2n−2, so ∥∂_t^l w∥²_{0,2n} is actually controlled by ∥∂_t^l w∥²_{0,2n−2l+2l} which is bounded by interpolation between the terms already in ¯D*_n). In the transition from (6.45) to (6.47), the term ∑_l ∥∂_t^l w∥²_{0,2n} is bounded by ¯D*_n + ¯D♯_n using (5.6) and (5.25), as stated. We will expand the text at (6.47) to spell out this decomposition explicitly, separating the l = 0 and l ≥ 1 cases and indicating which terms in ¯D*_n and ¯D♯_n absorb each piece. revision: yes

  3. Referee: §1.2, Remark 2.2: The reduction b = e_3 + ∂_3η and the resulting wave structure ∂²₃η in (1.7b) critically depend on b_0 = e_3 being perpendicular to the boundary. The remark that results 'may still hold true' for non-perpendicular fields is speculative. While this does not affect the correctness of the current result, the authors should clarify whether the perpendicularity is used only for the reduction (1.6)–(1.7b) or also more structurally in the anisotropic estimates of Lemma 3.2, which rely on the strip geometry.

    Authors: We thank the referee for this observation. To clarify: the perpendicularity of b_0 = e_3 is used in two distinct places. First, and most critically, it is used for the reduction (1.6)–(1.7b): the identity b·∇_A b = ∂²₃η holds specifically because b = e_3 + ∂₃η, which requires b_0 = e_3. This is what produces the wave-like structure ∂²₃η in the momentum equation and is essential to the entire energy scheme. Second, the anisotropic estimates of Lemma 3.2 rely on the strip geometry Ω = ℝ² × (0,1) and the explicit Fourier representation in the horizontal variables, but they do not themselves depend on the direction of b_0; they depend only on the domain geometry and the boundary conditions. So the perpendicularity enters structurally through the reduction (1.6)–(1.7b), not through Lemma 3.2. For a non-perpendicular constant background field b_0, the reduction b = (I + ∇η)b_0 still holds, but b·∇_A b would no longer simplify to a pure ∂²₃η term, and the wave structure would be lost or altered. Whether a suitable substitute structure exists is genuinely open. We will revise Remark 2.2 to make this distinction clear and to tone down the speculative language, explicitly stating that perpendicularity is used for the reduction (1.6)–(1.7b) and that the anisotropic estimates of Lemma 3.2 depend on the strip geometry but not on the direction of b_0. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity found; the derivation is self-contained with standard a priori assumptions and independent external benchmarks.

full rationale

The paper proves global stability of a vertically charged steady magnetic field for 3D incompressible magneto-micropolar equations via a two-tier energy method in Lagrangian coordinates. The derivation chain is self-contained: (1) The a priori assumption G_{2N}(T) ≤ δ (eq. 4.1) is a standard bootstrap assumption for local solutions, not a definition of the output. The closure in Lemma 7.4 shows G_{2N}(t) ≲ E_{2N}(0) + F_{2N}(0), which is strictly smaller than δ when initial data is small — this is the standard bootstrap closure, not circular reasoning. (2) The self-citation to [11] (compressible version by overlapping authors Feng-Hong-Zhu) is explicitly distinguished: the paper states 'the crucial analysis in [11] cannot be accessed for the problem considered in this paper' because the incompressible pressure involves both u and w, unlike the compressible density. The new Helmholtz projection approach (Lemma 3.2) is developed precisely to overcome this, providing genuinely independent content. (3) The citation to [12] (Guo-Tice) provides the two-tier energy framework, which is an externally developed method, not a self-citation. (4) The reduction b = e_3 + ∂_3η (eq. 1.6) follows from det(I_3 + ∇η) = 1, which is derived from the PDE structure (∂_t J = J div_A u = 0), not assumed. (5) The inductive σ-absorption in Section 6 uses 'for any σ > 0' in Lemma 3.2, and the text states 'provided σ is suitably small' at each inductive step — this is a standard small-constant absorption argument where finitely many steps each require σ small, and taking the minimum works. This is a technical completeness concern (correctness risk), not circularity. No step in the derivation chain reduces to its inputs by construction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

3 free parameters · 4 axioms · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no new physical entities, particles, forces, or dimensions. It works within the standard magneto-micropolar fluid model (1.2) with standard physical parameters (µ, ζ, ν, κ_i). The Lagrangian formulation and Helmholtz projection are standard mathematical tools, not invented entities. The 'two-tier energy method' is a proof technique, not a postulated physical object.

free parameters (3)
  • ε₀ (initial data smallness) = sufficiently small (not numerically specified)
    The smallness constant ε₀ for the initial energy E_{2N}(0) + F_{2N}(0) is required by Theorem 2.1 but is not explicitly computed; it is determined implicitly by the closure of the energy scheme (requiring δ sufficiently small in the a priori assumption 4.1).
  • δ (a priori bound) = sufficiently small (not numerically specified)
    The a priori assumption G_{2N}(T) ≤ δ (eq. 4.1) requires δ to be small enough to control the Lagrangian matrix A and close estimates. Its existence is proven by contradiction/continuity but no explicit value is given.
  • θ (decay parameter) = any θ > 0 (chosen so N-2 ≥ 1+θ)
    The parameter θ > 0 appears in the weighted dissipation integral (eq. 2.5) and the decay estimate. It is a free parameter of the method, not fitted to data, but must satisfy N-2 ≥ 1+θ for the Gronwall argument in Lemma 7.4.
axioms (4)
  • domain assumption Local well-posedness of the reduced system (1.7) in Lagrangian coordinates
    §3.4 states local well-posedness follows from 'similar arguments as in [32]' and omits the proof. This is a standard but unproved background result the paper relies on.
  • standard math Sobolev embedding H^s(Ω) ↪ L^∞(Ω) for s > 3/2 in the strip domain Ω = R² × (0,1)
    Used throughout to bound L^∞ norms of derivatives of u, η, and A by Sobolev norms (e.g., eq. 4.13, 4.22). Standard for this domain.
  • standard math Regularity theory for the Stokes system and elliptic equations on infinite strip domains
    Lemma 3.5 and the estimates in (3.6), (6.32), (6.35) rely on classical regularity results for the Stokes system and Poisson/Neumann problems on Ω = R² × (0,1), citing [1, 18, 33].
  • domain assumption The initial magnetic field b₀ = e₃ (perpendicular to boundary)
    §1.2 assumes b₀ = e₃ for simplicity. The reduction b = e₃ + ∂₃η (eq. 1.6-1.7) and the resulting wave structure ∂²₃η depend on this. Remark 2.2 notes results 'may still hold' for non-perpendicular fields but this is unproved.

pith-pipeline@v1.1.0-glm · 50368 in / 3412 out tokens · 287719 ms · 2026-07-08T01:20:01.209163+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

38 extracted references · 38 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    Abels and M

    H. Abels and M. Wiegner, Resolvent estimates for the Stokes operator on an infinite layer, Differential Integral Equations,18(2005): 1081–1110

    work page 2005

  2. [2]

    Ahmadi, Universal stability of thermo-magneto-micropolar fluid motions,Int

    G. Ahmadi, Universal stability of thermo-magneto-micropolar fluid motions,Int. J. Engng Sci., 15(1976): 853–859

    work page 1976

  3. [3]

    C. Cao, D. Regmi and J. Wu, The 2D MHD equations with horizontal dissipation and horizontal magnetic diffusion,J. Differential Equations,254(2013): 2661–2681

    work page 2013

  4. [4]

    Cao and J

    C. Cao and J. Wu, Global regularity for the 2D MHD equations with mixed partial dissipation and magnetic diffusion,Adv. Math.,226(2011): 1803–1822

    work page 2011

  5. [5]

    Cheng and Y

    J. Cheng and Y. Liu, Global regularity of the 2D magnetic micropolar fluid flows with mixed partial viscosity,Comput. Math. Appl.,70(2015): 66–72

    work page 2015

  6. [6]

    Dong and Z

    B. Dong and Z. Zhang, Global regularity of the 2D micropolar fluid flows with zero angular viscosity,J. Differential Equations,249(2010): 200–213

    work page 2010

  7. [7]

    Duvaut and J.-L

    G. Duvaut and J.-L. Lions, In´ equations en thermo´ elasticit´ e et magn´ etohydrodynamique,Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal.,46(1972): 241–279

    work page 1972

  8. [8]

    Erdo˘ gan, Polar effects in the apparent viscosity of a suspension,Rheologica Acta,9(1970): 434–438

    M. Erdo˘ gan, Polar effects in the apparent viscosity of a suspension,Rheologica Acta,9(1970): 434–438

    work page 1970

  9. [9]

    Eringen, Theory of micropolar fluids,J

    A.C. Eringen, Theory of micropolar fluids,J. Math. Mech.,16(1966): 1–18

    work page 1966

  10. [10]

    J. Fan, S. Jiang and G. Nakamura, Stability of weak solutions to equations of magnetohydrody- namics with Lebesgue initial data,J. Differential Equations,251(2011): 2025–2036

    work page 2011

  11. [11]

    Z. Feng, G. Hong and C. Zhu, Global classical solutions for 3d compressible magneto-micropolar fluids without resistivity and spin viscosity in a strip domain,Sci. China Math.,67(2024): 2485–2514

    work page 2024

  12. [12]

    Guo and I

    Y. Guo and I. Tice, Almost exponential decay of periodic viscous surface waves without surface tension,Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal.,207(2013): 459–531

    work page 2013

  13. [13]

    Guo and I

    Y. Guo and I. Tice, Local well-posedness of the viscous surface wave problem without surface tension,Anal. PDE,6(2013): 287–369

    work page 2013

  14. [14]

    G. Hong, X. Hou, H. Peng and C. Zhu, Global existence for a class of large solutions to three- dimensional compressible magnetohydrodynamic equations with vacuum,SIAM J. Math. Anal., 49(2017): 2409–2441

    work page 2017

  15. [15]

    Global Existence for Two Dimensional Compressible Magnetohydrodynamic Flows with Zero Magnetic Diffusivity

    X. Hu, Global existence for two dimensional compressible magnetohydrodynamic flows with zero magnetic diffusivity, preprint,arXiv:1405.0274, (2014)

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  16. [16]

    Hu and D

    X. Hu and D. Wang, Compactness of weak solutions to the three-dimensional compressible magnetohydrodynamic equations,J. Differential Equations,245(2008): 2176–2198. 41

    work page 2008

  17. [17]

    Hu and D

    X. Hu and D. Wang, Global existence and large-time behavior of solutions to the three- dimen- sional equations of compressible magnetohydrodynamic flows,Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal.,197 (2010): 203–238

    work page 2010

  18. [18]

    Ladyzhenskaya,The Mathematical Theory of Viscous Incompressible Flow, Martino Fine Books, 2014

    O.A. Ladyzhenskaya,The Mathematical Theory of Viscous Incompressible Flow, Martino Fine Books, 2014

    work page 2014

  19. [19]

    H. Li, X. Xu and J. Zhang, Global classical solutions to 3D compressible magnetohydrodynamic equations with large oscillations and vacuum,SIAM J. Math. Anal.,45(2013): 1356–1387

    work page 2013

  20. [20]

    F. Lin, L. Xu and P. Zhang, Global small solutions of 2-D incompressible MHD system,J. Differential Equations,259(2015): 5440–5485

    work page 2015

  21. [21]

    Lin and Z

    H. Lin and Z. Xiang, Global well-posedness for the 2D incompressible magneto-micropolar fluid system with partial viscosity,Sci. China Math.,63(2020): 1285–1306

    work page 2020

  22. [22]

    Liu and S

    J. Liu and S. Wang, Initial-boundary value problem for 2D micropolar equations without angular viscosity,Commun. Math. Sci.,16(2018): 2147–2165

    work page 2018

  23. [23]

    Ma, Global existence of three-dimensional incompressible magneto-micropolar system with mixed partial dissipation, magnetic diffusion and angular viscosity,Comput

    L. Ma, Global existence of three-dimensional incompressible magneto-micropolar system with mixed partial dissipation, magnetic diffusion and angular viscosity,Comput. Math. Appl.75 (2018), 170-186

    work page 2018

  24. [24]

    Regmi and J

    D. Regmi and J. Wu, Global regularity for the 2D magneto-micropolar equations with partial dissipation,J. Math. Study,49(2016): 169–194

    work page 2016

  25. [25]

    X. Ren, J. Wu, Z. Xiang and Z. Zhang, Global existence and decay of smooth solution for the 2-D MHD equations without magnetic diffusion,J. Funct. Anal.,267(2014): 503–541

    work page 2014

  26. [26]

    X. Ren, Z. Xiang and Z. Zhang, Global well-posedness for the 2D MHD equations without magnetic diffusion in a strip domain,Nonlinearity,29(2016): 1257–1291

    work page 2016

  27. [27]

    Rojas-Medar and J.L

    M.A. Rojas-Medar and J.L. Boldrini, Magneto-micropolar fluid motion: existence of weak solu- tions,Rev. Mat. Complut.,11(1998): 443–460

    work page 1998

  28. [28]

    Sermange and R

    M. Sermange and R. Temam, Some mathematical questions related to the MHD equations, Comm. Pure Appl. Math.,36(1983): 635–664

    work page 1983

  29. [29]

    Shang and J

    H. Shang and J. Wu, Global regularity for 2D fractional magneto-micropolar equations,Math. Z.,297(2021), 775–802

    work page 2021

  30. [30]

    Shang and J

    H. Shang and J. Zhao, Global regularity for 2D magneto-micropolar equations with only micro- rotational velocity dissipation and magnetic diffusion,Nonlinear Anal.150(2017), 194-209

    work page 2017

  31. [31]

    Strain and Y

    R.M. Strain and Y. Guo, Almost exponential decay near Maxwellian,Comm. PDE,31(2006): 417–429

    work page 2006

  32. [32]

    Tan and Y

    Z. Tan and Y. Wang, Global well-posedness of an initial-boundary value problem for viscous non-resistive MHD systems,SIAM J. Math. Anal.,50(2018): 1432–1470

    work page 2018

  33. [33]

    Temam,Navier-Stokes Equations: Theory and Numerical Analysis, North-Holland, Amster- dam, 1977

    R. Temam,Navier-Stokes Equations: Theory and Numerical Analysis, North-Holland, Amster- dam, 1977

    work page 1977

  34. [34]

    Wang and Y

    Y. Wang and Y. Wang, Blow-up criterion for two-dimensional magneto-micropolar fluid equa- tions with partial viscosity,Math. Meth. Appl. Sci.,34(2011): 2125–2135

    work page 2011

  35. [35]

    Xiang and H

    Z. Xiang and H. Yang, On the regularity criteria for the 3D magneto-micropolar fluids in terms of one directional derivative,Bound. Value Prob.2012, 139 (2012)

    work page 2012

  36. [36]

    Xu and P

    L. Xu and P. Zhang, Global small solutions to three-dimensional incompressible magnetohydro- dynamical system,SIAM J. Math. Anal.,47(2015): 26–65

    work page 2015

  37. [37]

    Yamazaki, Global regularity of the two-dimensional magneto-micropolar fluid system with zero angular viscosity,Disc

    K. Yamazaki, Global regularity of the two-dimensional magneto-micropolar fluid system with zero angular viscosity,Disc. Cont. Dyna. Syst.,35(2015): 2193–2207

    work page 2015

  38. [38]

    Yuan, Regularity of weak solutions to magneto-micropolar fluid equations,Acta Math

    B. Yuan, Regularity of weak solutions to magneto-micropolar fluid equations,Acta Math. Sci- entia,30(2010), 1469-1480. 42 (Z. Feng)School of Mathematical Sciences, Chongqing Normal University, China Email address:zefufeng@mails.ccnu.edu.cn (G. Hong)School of Mathematics, South China University of Technology, China Email address:magyhong@scut.edu.cn (J. Wu...

    work page 2010