Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 40 references

Inevitable shock formation for 3-D compressible Euler flows

T0 review · 2 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Any smooth, sufficiently small, compactly supported irrotational perturbation of a constant state in three-dimensional compressible Euler must blow up in finite time, forming a shock at the boundary of the maximal Cauchy development with…

desk verdict A landmark no-symmetry shock-formation theorem for 3D irrotational Euler, with a clever radiation-field-to-Riccati pipeline; the proof's load-bearing import from Christodoulou–Miao needs explicit hypothesis verification. read the letter →

arxiv 2608.09843 v1 pith:2KVV23GB submitted 2026-08-10 math.AP

Sergiu Klainerman , Qian Wang , Shiwu Yang , Pin Yu This is my paper · ORCID
classification math.AP MSC 35L6735Q3176N15
keywords compressibleEulerequationsshockformationblow-upirrotationalflowquasilinearwaveradiationfieldlifespanasymptoticsacousticalgeometry
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper proves that in three-dimensional irrotational compressible Euler flow, every sufficiently small, smooth, compactly supported perturbation of a non-vacuum constant state develops a shock in finite time; no symmetry, compression, or non-degeneracy condition on the data is needed. The shock appears at the boundary of the maximal Cauchy development, and the formation time obeys $\varepsilon \log T_\varepsilon \to \tau^*$, the same asymptotic lifespan predicted by the radiation-field lower bound. The mechanism is new: compact support alone encodes an outgoing compression region, which forms dynamically by the intermediate time $t_1 = 1/(2\varepsilon)$ along the null geodesic selected by the radiation field. A Riccati equation for a specially designed physical radiation field then forces finite-time blow-up, so smallness alone makes shock formation inevitable.

What carries the argument

The central object is the physical radiation field $\tilde z = c\tilde r(L\varrho - h\varrho)$, defined on the outgoing acoustical null foliation, where $c$ is the sound speed, $\tilde r=t+u$ with $u$ the acoustical retarded time, $L$ the null generator, $\varrho$ the normalized log-density, and $h$ half the null expansion of the acoustical spheres. Along each outgoing null geodesic $\Upsilon_{\omega,q}$ it satisfies a Riccati equation $d\tilde z/dt = \tfrac12 \wp\tilde r^{-1}\tilde z^2 + \mathrm{Er}_1\tilde z + \mathrm{Er}_0$ with controlled small errors and positive coefficient $\wp=(\gamma+1)/2$. At the intermediate time $t_1=1/(2\varepsilon)$ the value of $\tilde z$ along the distinguished geodesic $\Upsilon_*$ selected by the maximum in $\tau^*$ is $-2\varepsilon\bar c^{-1}\partial_q^2 F_0(\omega_*,q_*)+o(\varepsilon)$, which is positive, i.e. compression has formed. The Riccati blow-up then bounds the exterior lifespan from above, while the transport estimate $L(bz)=O(\varepsilon\log\langle t\rangle\,\langle t\rangle^{-2})$ keeps $bz$ nearly constant along null geodesics, which is the tool that turns the lifespan bound into the statement that $|\partial\Phi|$ blows up at the shock.

What would settle it

For a specific pair $(f,g)$, compute the radiation field $F_0$, locate the maximizing point $(\omega_*,q_*)$ in $\tau^*$, solve the Riccati equation (5.10) with initial value given by (5.1), and compare its blow-up time with a high-resolution numerical solution of (1.9) for several small $\varepsilon$; smooth solutions surviving well past the predicted $\tau^*$ lifespan would disprove the mechanism. Alternatively, a direct verification that the hypotheses of the Christodoulou–Miao exterior theorem hold for the thin-annulus data at $t_0=5\bar c^{-1}$ would close the one unproved input.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The main theorem (Theorem 1.2) states that for any smooth $f,g$ compactly supported in $\{|x|\le 1\}$ there exists $\varepsilon_0>0$ such that for all $0<\varepsilon\le \varepsilon_0$ the irrotational Euler potential equation (1.9) has a unique smooth solution for $0<t<T_\varepsilon$, with $\lim_{\varepsilon\to 0}\varepsilon\log T_\varepsilon = \tau^*$. The boundary of the maximal Cauchy development contains a shock at time $T_e^\varepsilon \ge T_\varepsilon$ with the same asymptotic lifespan, and $|\partial\Phi|\to\infty$ as $t\to T_e^\varepsilon-$; the blow-up occurs along an outgoing null geodesic approaching the shock. Here $\tau^* = (\max_{\omega,q} \tfrac12 G(\omega)\,\partial_q^2 F_0(\omega,q))^{-1}$ is computed from the Friedlander radiation field $F_0$ of the linearized data, with $G=-2\bar c^{-1}\wp$ and $\wp=(\gamma+1)/2$. The theorem thus establishes for generic small data what was previously known only under radial symmetry or an imposed initial compression condition: the compression that triggers the shock is produced by the evolution itself.

Load-bearing premise

The proof imports the full exterior acoustical-geometric package of Christodoulou and Miao, in particular the criterion that finite-time breakdown in the exterior annulus forces the null lapse $b$ to tend to zero; the smallness and energy estimates that prepare the data at $t_0=5\bar c^{-1}$ are stated without proof, so the whole result rests on that imported package applying to these thin-annulus data.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • For any such small data, the smooth solution cannot be global: shock formation is generic rather than tied to symmetry or to an initial compression region.
  • The John–Hörmander lower bound on the lifespan is in fact sharp at leading order, since $\varepsilon\log T_\varepsilon\to\tau^*$.
  • At the first shock the first derivatives of the velocity and density blow up while the fields themselves remain bounded and continuous, matching John's description of shock formation.
  • The Riccati mechanism operates along every outgoing null geodesic in the exterior region, not only along $\Upsilon_*$, and this is what allows the proof to show $|\partial\Phi|\to\infty$ approaching the shock.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same strategy may extend to the full compressible Euler system with vorticity and entropy; the authors state this is work in progress, and the Riccati mechanism would need to dominate the vorticity and entropy contributions at leading order.
  • The proof suggests a practical diagnostic for shock time: the sign and size of $\varepsilon\partial_q^2F_0$ at the maximizing radiation point predict compression, so numerical codes could monitor this functional as an early-warning indicator.
  • For other quasilinear systems with genuine nonlinearity and no null condition, one may conjecture that compact support alone similarly guarantees finite-time blow-up in three dimensions, with the analogue of $\tau^*$ computed from the linearized radiation field.
  • A fully self-contained proof would derive the exterior breakdown criterion directly for these data rather than importing the Christodoulou–Miao package; the theorem's conclusions are exactly as strong as that package holds.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper claims that for the 3-D irrotational compressible Euler equations, every smooth, compactly supported, sufficiently small perturbation of a non-vacuum constant state develops a shock in finite time, without symmetry or initial-compression assumptions. The proof combines the John–Hörmander lower bound on the lifespan (Theorem 1.1) with an exterior acoustical-geometry analysis. After passing to a thin annulus at t0 = 5 cbar^{-1}, the authors import the Christodoulou–Miao exterior estimates (Proposition 4.2), introduce a 'physical radiation field' tilde z, show from the Friedlander radiation field that a positive compression of size ε forms at the intermediate time t1 = 1/(2ε) (Proposition 5.1), derive a Riccati equation with positive quadratic term (Proposition 5.5), and thereby obtain an upper bound on the exterior lifespan that matches the lower bound. The imported breakdown criterion converts the finite exterior lifespan into vanishing of the null lapse b, and a contradiction argument upgrades this to |∂Φ| → ∞ at the shock.

Significance. If the main theorem is correct, it establishes a major result in the small-data theory of 3-D compressible Euler: smallness alone forces shock formation for arbitrary compactly supported irrotational data, and the asymptotic lifespan is sharply predicted by the linear radiation field. The paper gives a clean conceptual mechanism — the compact support of the data creates compression at an intermediate time, after which a Riccati equation drives blow-up — and the asymptotic constant τ* is computed from the linearized data rather than fitted. The geometric framework is introduced carefully, and the proof has a clear modular structure. The main obstacle to accepting the proof is the unverified applicability of the imported exterior theorem from [11]; this is the central issue that needs to be resolved.

major comments (2)
  1. [§4, Propositions 4.1–4.2] The bridge from the concrete data of Theorem 1.2 to the Christodoulou–Miao exterior estimates is not established. Proposition 4.1 is stated with a one-sentence proof ('We omit the details here for simplicity') and supplies only H^{l0} smallness (4.1) at t0. The text then asserts in Proposition 4.2 that [11, Theorem 17.1] applies to the thin annulus data, but the hypotheses of that theorem are never stated, and the introduction (Section 1.1 and Remark 1.5) indicates that [11] works under an initial compression condition. For arbitrary compactly supported f,g, no compression condition is verified. If [11, Theorem 17.1] requires such a condition, then the estimates (4.2), the coordinate statement (3), and especially the breakdown criterion (2) cannot be used; the Riccati blow-up of tilde z in Proposition 5.5 would then imply only the blow-up of an auxiliary quantity, not inf_{Σ^m_t} b → 0 and hence not shock formation at the boundary of the maximal development. The authors should state the exact hypotheses of [11, Theorem 17.1], prove that the ε-small annulus data of Proposition 4.1 satisfy them, or replace Proposition 4.2 with a self-contained proof of the exterior estimates.
  2. [§4, Proposition 4.2(2)] The proof of the breakdown criterion is only sketched. From (4.2) and the assumption that inf_{Σ^m_t} b ≥ c0 > 0, the text asserts that the solution extends past T_e^ε by 'the standard energy argument and the local existence result'. The estimates displayed in (4.2) include only a subset of the derivatives needed for a continuation principle for a quasilinear second-order hyperbolic system; for example, |b^2∂^2Φ| and /∆Φ are controlled, but the full high-order energy estimates that would justify extension are not listed. Since Proposition 4.2(2) is exactly what upgrades finite exterior lifespan to vanishing null lapse (and hence to shock), the authors should either quote the full statement of [11, Theorem 17.1] including all derivative estimates, or supply the continuation argument in detail.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Theorem 1.2] The theorem should exclude the trivial case f ≡ 0, g ≡ 0. In that case τ* = 0 but the solution is the global trivial solution, so (1.15) cannot hold. The statement should explicitly assume that (f,g) is not identically zero.
  2. [Corollary 4.4] Corollary 4.4 as stated is incorrect: (4.4) gives q - q0 = O(ε(log⟨t⟩)^2), which near t ∼ T_e ∼ exp(c/ε) is O(1/ε), not O(ε(log(1/ε))^2). The proof should restrict the claim to t ≤ t1, where it is used in Proposition 5.1 and Corollary 5.4, or prove a genuinely uniform bound. The main argument survives because only the t = t1 case is needed.
  3. [Equation (1.17)] In (1.17), tilde z = c e^r(Lϱ - hϱ) should read tilde z = c tilde r(Lϱ - hϱ); the symbol e^r is undefined and appears to be a typographical error.
  4. [Between (5.12) and (5.16)] The notation 2^- in (5.12) and in Step 5 is introduced only in a footnote; it should be defined at first use in the main text to avoid ambiguity.
  5. [Throughout] Please correct typographical errors such as 'compressbile' in Section 1.2 and 'Corrollary' in the proof of Corollary 5.4.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No circular reduction: the upper and lower lifespan bounds are derived independently and agree, and the cited [38] construction of z̃ is re-derived in the present paper, so the only self-citation is minor rather than load-bearing.

full rationale

The main theorem's asymptotic lifespan τ* is not fitted: it is defined from the Friedlander radiation field of the initial data in Theorem 1.1, and (1.15)-(1.16) are obtained by matching an independent lower bound (John–Hörmander Theorem 1.1) with an upper bound from the Riccati analysis of z̃. The key compression estimate (1.20) uses Proposition 5.3, which approximates the nonlinear solution by the linear radiation field; the error estimates are proved in Sections 2 and 5, not imported as the conclusion. The only self-citation in the central construction is [38], cited for choosing z̃ in (1.17); however, the paper derives the required transport and structure equations (3.38)-(3.39), Proposition 3.11, and the Riccati equation (5.10) in the text, so the citation supplies a construction, not the theorem's conclusion. The exterior package [11, Theorem 17.1] (Prop. 4.2) is an external theorem of Christodoulou–Miao, not a self-citation, and it is used conditionally: breakdown forces inf b → 0, and the paper supplies its own mechanism for breakdown. The flagged omitted proof in Proposition 4.1 ('We omit the details here for simplicity') is a completeness and verification risk: it is the only bridge from arbitrary compactly supported f,g to the hypotheses of [11, Theorem 17.1], and the paper does not verify a compression condition, which [11] imposes for its shock-formation applications. This affects correctness of the imported-theorem applicability, but it is not a circular reduction, since the hypotheses are not the target conclusion and no fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction. Score 2 reflects only the minor, non-load-bearing self-citation [38].

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The proof introduces no fitted constants and no new physical entities. The quantity z̃ is a derived geometric object, not a postulated force or particle. The ledger is dominated by imported external input, chiefly the Christodoulou-Miao geometric package and the John-Hörmander lifespan theory, plus the modeling assumptions of irrotationality and a polytropic pressure law.

assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption The Christodoulou-Miao exterior acoustical theorem [11, Theorem 17.1] applies to the annulus data at t0=5c̄^{-1} and supplies both the decay estimates and the breakdown criterion b→0 in D+.
    This is the largest imported object in the proof. It is stated as Proposition 4.2, but its hypotheses are only checked via the unproved Proposition 4.1. If the theorem does not apply, shock formation at the boundary does not follow from the Riccati blow-up alone.
  • standard math The John-Hörmander lifespan lower bound (Theorem 1.1) and the almost-global linear approximation estimates of Proposition 2.1 hold for equation (1.9).
    Used to guarantee smooth existence up to t1=1/(2ε) and to identify τ* from the linear radiation field; these are accepted prior results from [14,19].
  • domain assumption The flow is irrotational and the pressure law is p=Aρ^γ with γ>1, giving ℘=(γ+1)/2>1.
    This defines the theorem's class. Irrotationality permits the wave-potential reduction (1.9), and the positivity of ℘ sets the sign of the quadratic term in the Riccati equation that drives blow-up.
  • standard math Standard local well-posedness and local energy estimates hold for the quasilinear system (1.7)-(1.8) up to any time before breakdown.
    Invoked implicitly throughout, for example in Proposition 4.1 and in the continuation argument inside Proposition 4.2(2).

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Inevitable shock formation for 3-D compressible Euler flows." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/2KVV23GB

@misc{pith2026260809843,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Inevitable shock formation for 3-D compressible Euler flows},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/2KVV23GB}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2608.09843}
}
read the original abstract

We prove that solutions arising from smooth, sufficiently small, compactly supported perturbations of non-vacuum constant states in three-dimensional irrotational compressible flow must blow up in finite time, without any symmetry assumptions or other restrictions on the initial data. Moreover, we prove that shock inevitably forms at the boundary of the maximal Cauchy development, and that its formation time agrees, in the small-data asymptotic regime, with the lifespan predicted by the radiation-field analysis.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2608.09843 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Set-up Step 2: Riccati equation for the physical radiation field. Using the wave equation (1.8) for ϱ, ✷gϱ = Q0 , together with the causal-geometric estimates in D+ (Proposition 4.2) one obtains, along each outgoing null geodesic Υω,q which initiates at (ω, q, t0), the Riccati-type equation, see (5.10), d dt z˜(t) = 1 2 ℘ r˜ −1 z˜(t) 2 + Er1(t)˜z(t) + Er0(t), t ∈ [t0, Te ε ), (1.18) with proper control on the errors… view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

40 extracted references · 39 canonical work pages

  1. [11]

    and Miao, S.Compressible Flow and Euler’s Equations, (monograph, 602 pp.) Surveys in Modern Mathematics Volume 9, International Press (ISBN 9781571462978), 2014

    Christodoulou, D. and Miao, S.Compressible Flow and Euler’s Equations, (monograph, 602 pp.) Surveys in Modern Mathematics Volume 9, International Press (ISBN 9781571462978), 2014

    work page 2014

  2. [1]

    Partial Differential Equations 17 (1992), no

    Alinhac, S.Une solution approch´ ee en grand temps des ´ equations d’Euler compressibles axisym´ etriques en dimension deux.Comm. Partial Differential Equations 17 (1992), no. 3-4, 447–490

    work page 1992

  3. [2]

    Alinhac S.Temps de vie des solutions regulieres de equations d’Euler compressibles axisymetriques en dimendion deux.Invent Math, 1993, 111:627-667

    work page 1993

  4. [3]

    Alinhac, S.Blowup of small data solutions for a quasilinear wave equation in two space dimensions.Ann. of Math. (2) 149 (1999), no. 1, 97–127

    work page 1999

  5. [4]

    II, Acta Math

    Alinhac, S.Blowup of small data solutions for a class of quasilinear wave equations in two space dimen- sions. II, Acta Math. 182 (1999), no. 1, 1–23

    work page 1999

  6. [5]

    and Moncrief, V.Elliptic-Hyperbolic Systems and the Einstein Equations.Ann

    Andersson, L. and Moncrief, V.Elliptic-Hyperbolic Systems and the Einstein Equations.Ann. Henri Poincar´ e 4, 1–34 (2003)

    work page 2003

  7. [6]

    and Vicol, V.Formation of shocks for 2D isentropic compressible Euler

    Buckmaster, T., Shkoller, S. and Vicol, V.Formation of shocks for 2D isentropic compressible Euler. Comm. Pure Appl. Math. 75 (2022), no. 9, 2069–2120. INEVITABLE SHOCK FORMATION FOR 3-D COMPRESSIBLE EULER FLOWS 29

    work page 2022

  8. [7]

    and Vicol, V.Formation of point shocks for 3D compressible Euler.Comm

    Buckmaster, T., Shkoller, S. and Vicol, V.Formation of point shocks for 3D compressible Euler.Comm. Pure Appl. Math. 76 (2023), no. 9, 2073–2191

    work page 2023

Show all 40 references
  1. [8]

    and Vicol, V.Shock formation and vorticity creation for 3d Euler.Comm

    Buckmaster, T., Shkoller, S. and Vicol, V.Shock formation and vorticity creation for 3d Euler.Comm. Pure Appl. Math. 76 (2023), no. 9, 1965–2072

    2023

  2. [9]

    and Klainerman, S.,The Global Nonlinear Stability of Minkowski Space.Princeton Mathematical Series 41, 1993, 526 pp

    Christodoulou, D. and Klainerman, S.,The Global Nonlinear Stability of Minkowski Space.Princeton Mathematical Series 41, 1993, 526 pp

    1993

  3. [10]

    Christodoulou, D.The formation of shocks in 3-dimensional fluids.EMS Monographs in Mathematics, European Mathematical Society (EMS), Z¨ urich, 2007

    2007

  4. [12]

    Christodoulou, D and Perez, D.R.On the formation of shocks of electromagnetic plane waves in non-linear crystals, J. Math. Phys. 57, 081506 (2016)

    2016

  5. [13]

    H¨ ormander L.The lifespan of classical solutions of nonlinear hyperbolic equations.Mittag-Leffler report no.5, 1985

    1985

  6. [14]

    H¨ ormander, LNonlinear hyperbolic differential equations.Lectures, 1986-1987

    1986

  7. [15]

    Pure Appl

    John, F.Formation of singularities in one-dimensional nonlinear wave propagation.Comm. Pure Appl. Math., 27 (1974) 377-405

    1974

  8. [16]

    Blow-up of solutions of nonlinear wave equations in three space dimensions

    John, F. Blow-up of solutions of nonlinear wave equations in three space dimensions. Manuscripta Math 28, 235–268 (1979)

    1979

  9. [17]

    Pure Appl

    John, F.,Blow up for quasilinear wave equations in three space dimensions.Comm. Pure Appl. Math. 34 (1981), 29-51

    1981

  10. [18]

    Apl.Comput

    John, F.Blow-up of radial solutions ofu tt =c 2(u)△uin three space dimensions, Mat. Apl.Comput. 4 (1985), no. 13–18

    1985

  11. [19]

    Pure Appl

    John, F.Existence for large times of strict solutions of nonlinear wave equations in three space dimensions for small initial data, Comm. Pure Appl. Math. 40 (1987), no. 1, 79–109

    1987

  12. [20]

    The third phase, Nonlinear hyper- bolic problems (Bordeaux, 1988), 1989, pp

    John F.Solutions of quasilinear wave equations with small initial data. The third phase, Nonlinear hyper- bolic problems (Bordeaux, 1988), 1989, pp. 155–184

    1988

  13. [21]

    and Klainerman S.Almost global existence to nonlinear wave equations in three space dimensions

    John F. and Klainerman S.Almost global existence to nonlinear wave equations in three space dimensions. Comm. Pure Appl. Math. 37, 1984, pp443-455

    1984

  14. [22]

    and Majda A.Formation of singularities for wave equations including the nonlinear vi- brating string,Comm

    Klainerman, S. and Majda A.Formation of singularities for wave equations including the nonlinear vi- brating string,Comm. Pure Appl. Math. 33 (1980), no. 3, 241–263. MR562736 (81f:35080)

    1980

  15. [23]

    Klainerman S.Uniform decay estimates and the Lorentz invariance of the classical wave equations, Com- munications on Pure and Applied Mathematics,38(1985), 321-332

    1985

  16. [24]

    Klainerman, S.A commuting vectorfield approach to Strichartz type inequalities and applications to quasi- linear wave equations.Int. Math. Res. Notices 2001, No 5, 221–274

    2001

  17. [25]

    and Rodnianski, I.,Rough solutions to the Einstein vacuum equations, Ann

    Klainerman, S. and Rodnianski, I.,Rough solutions to the Einstein vacuum equations, Ann. Math. 161 (2005), 1143–1193

    2005

  18. [26]

    Mathematical Phys., 5:5 (1964) 611- 614

    Lax, P.Development of singularities of solutions of nonlinear hyperbolic partial differential equations.J. Mathematical Phys., 5:5 (1964) 611- 614

    1964

  19. [27]

    Lax, P.The formation and decay of shock waves.Amer. Math. Monthly, 79, 1972, pp. 227-241

    1972

  20. [28]

    Differential Equations, 33 (1979) 92-111

    Liu, T.-P.The development of singularities in the nonlinear waves for quasi-linear hyperbolic partial differential equations.J. Differential Equations, 33 (1979) 92-111

    1979

  21. [29]

    Luk, J and Speck, J.The hidden null struct equations and a prelude to applications.Journal of Hyperbolic Differential Equations, Vol. 17, No. 01, pp. 1-60 (2020)

    2020

  22. [30]

    Luk, J and Speck, J.Shock formation in solutions to the2Dcompressible Euler equations in the presence of non-zero vorticity.Inventiones mathematicae, 214(3), October 2018

    2018

  23. [31]

    and Speck, J.The stability of simple plane-symmetric shock formation for 3D compressible Euler flow with vorticity and entropy.Analysis and PDE Volume 17, No.3, 2024

    Luk, J. and Speck, J.The stability of simple plane-symmetric shock formation for 3D compressible Euler flow with vorticity and entropy.Analysis and PDE Volume 17, No.3, 2024

    2024

  24. [32]

    and Yu, P.On the formation of shocks for quasilinear wave equations.Inventiones mathematicae 207 (2017), no

    Miao, S. and Yu, P.On the formation of shocks for quasilinear wave equations.Inventiones mathematicae 207 (2017), no. 2, 697–831

    2017

  25. [33]

    Nauk (N.S.) 12 (1957), no

    Oleinik, O.ADiscontinuous solutions of non-linear differential equations, Uspehi Mat. Nauk (N.S.) 12 (1957), no. 3(75), 3–73

    1957

  26. [34]

    Sideris, T.Formation of singularities in solutions to nonlinear hyperbolic equations.Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal. 1984-01, Vol.86 (4), p.369-381

    1984

  27. [35]

    Sideris, T.Formation of singularities in three-dimensional compressible fluids.Comm. Math. Phys. 101 (1985), no. 4, 475–485

    1985

  28. [36]

    Speck, J.Shock formation in small-data solutions to 3D quasilinear wave equations.Mathematical Surveys and Monographs, 2016

    2016

  29. [37]

    Wang, Q.Rough solutions of the 3-D compressible Euler equations.Ann. of Math. (2) 195 (2022), no. 2, 509–654

    2022

  30. [38]

    Wang, QOn global dynamics of3-D irrotational compressible fluids, arxiv:2407.13649, 2024, 232pp

    2024 arXiv

  31. [39]

    In preparation, 2026

    Wang, QBlowup of small data solutions to3-D full Compressible Euler System for a General Polytropic Gas. In preparation, 2026. 30 SERGIU KLAINERMAN, QIAN W ANG, SHIWU YANG, AND PIN YU

    2026

  32. [40]

    and Qiu, Q.The lifespan for 3-D spherically symmetric compressible euler equations.Acta Math- ematica Sinica 14, 527–534 (1998)

    Yin, H. and Qiu, Q.The lifespan for 3-D spherically symmetric compressible euler equations.Acta Math- ematica Sinica 14, 527–534 (1998). Department of Mathematics, Princeton University Email address:seri@math.princeton.edu Mathematical Institute, University of Oxford Email add...

    1998

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.