Drinfeld-Stuhler modules and the Hasse principle

Keisuke Arai; Mihran Papikian; Satoshi Kondo

REVIEW 1 major objections 6 minor 34 references

Drinfeld-Stuhler modules and the Hasse principle

T0 review · 1 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Drinfeld-Stuhler curves over $F_q(T)$ can fail the Hasse principle, and explicit examples exist.

desk verdict Real, checkable Hasse-principle counterexamples for Drinfeld-Stuhler curves and a genuinely new isogeny character theory; Proposition 3.3 is written too loosely and needs repair, but the underlying bound looks salvageable. read the letter →

arxiv 1908.08678 v1 pith:2LFHVSAG submitted 2019-08-23 math.NT

Keisuke Arai , Satoshi Kondo , Mihran Papikian This is my paper · ORCID

classification math.NT MSC 11G0911R52

keywords Drinfeld-StuhlermodulesD-ellipticsheavescanonicalisogenycharactersHasseprincipleDrinfeldmodularcurvesfunctionfieldarithmeticquaternionalgebrasrationalpoints

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper sets out to prove that Drinfeld-Stuhler modular varieties — function-field analogues of Shimura curves attached to quaternion algebras — can have no rational points over prescribed extensions of $F_q(T)$, and to make this failure explicit enough to produce counterexamples to the Hasse principle. The tool is a canonical isogeny character attached to the $p$-torsion of a Drinfeld-Stuhler module at a ramified prime $p$; this character controls both the Frobenius polynomial of the reduction and the ray class group of the field. The main theorems list explicit finite conditions under which $X_D(K)=\emptyset$, and for $d=2$ they combine with local-point criteria to exhibit specific pairs $(X_D,K)$ where the curve has points everywhere locally but no global point.

What carries the argument

The carrying object is the canonical subgroup $C_{\varphi,p}$ — the unique one-dimensional $F_p^{(d)}$-submodule of $\varphi[p]$ stable under the order $O_D$ — together with its Galois character $\rho_{\varphi,p}$. The paper shows that the norm of $\rho_{\varphi,p}$ is the determinant character and that its $(q-1)$-power agrees with the Carlitz module character; local ramification estimates from Proposition 3.3 then bound where $\rho_{\varphi,p}^{q^d-1}$ can ramify. These identities convert the existence of a Drinfeld-Stuhler module over $K$ into a congruence on Frobenius polynomials (Proposition 6.8) and a surjectivity statement for ray class groups (Lemma 6.5).

What would settle it

Construct a single Drinfeld-Stuhler module over a local field of characteristic $p$ whose good reduction is first achieved over a totally tamely ramified extension of degree not dividing $q^d-1$. Such an example would invalidate Proposition 3.3 and break the ramification control used in the main theorems.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that non-existence of rational points on $X_D(K)$ can be forced by the canonical isogeny character. For a central division algebra $D$ of dimension $d^2$ over $F=F_q(T)$ with a prime $p$ of invariant $1/d$, any Drinfeld-Stuhler module $\varphi$ over a degree-$d$ splitting field $K$ has a canonical subgroup $C_{\varphi,p}\cong F_p^{(d)}$ in $\varphi[p]$; the Galois action defines the character $\rho_{\varphi,p}$. The paper proves that $\rho_{\varphi,p}$ satisfies a norm/determinant identity with the Carlitz module and that local ramification is controlled by a tameness bound of degree dividing $q^d-1$. It follows that if $y$ is a totally ramified prime outside $\operatorname{Ram}(D)$ and $p\notin P'(y,\deg p)$ — or $p\notin P(y,\deg p)$ when $d=2$ — then $X_D(K)=\emptyset$. Theorems 6.6, 6.10, and 6.13 are the formal statements; Section 7 turns them into explicit quaternion-algebra examples over $F_3$ and $F_5$ violating the Hasse principle.

Load-bearing premise

The entire argument rests on the claim that every Drinfeld-Stuhler module over a local field becomes well-behaved (good reduction) over a totally tamely ramified extension of degree dividing $q^d-1$; if that degree bound is false, the main emptiness criteria need not follow.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

Theorems 6.6, 6.10, and 6.13 turn a rational-point question into a finite computation: checking membership in $P'(y,\deg p)$ or $P(y,\deg p)$ and checking a ray-class-group surjectivity condition.
For $d=2$, Examples 7.7, 7.8, and 7.10 provide explicit quaternion algebras and quadratic fields over $F_3$ and $F_5$ such that $X_D(K)=\emptyset$ while $X_D(K_v)\neq\emptyset$ for every place $v$.
The same canonical-isogeny-character criteria work for arbitrary $d\geq 2$; higher-dimensional Hasse-principle violations are blocked only by the absence of an analogous local-point theory for higher-dimensional Drinfeld-Stuhler varieties.
The obstruction is encoded in a congruence on the reduction's Frobenius polynomial, so checking the criteria does not require searching for rational points directly.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

One can view the finite set $P(y,\deg p)$ as a precomputable obstruction set: for fixed $q,d,y$, the same computer search that produced the examples can be rerun for all primes of a given degree, yielding a census of Hasse-principle violations.
If the embedding condition discussed in Remark 7.12 holds for the $d=2$ examples, then the Brauer-Manin obstruction is the only obstruction, so these are explicit function-field cases where failure of the Hasse principle is explained by the Brauer-Manin set rather than by local solubility alone.
The congruence in Proposition 6.8 constrains Frobenius elements at the totally ramified prime, so the same canonical character should also obstruct weak approximation or constrain $X_D(K)$ when it is nonempty; the paper does not pursue this.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

This paper is worth taking seriously. It does two genuinely new things: it develops canonical isogeny characters for Drinfeld-Stuhler modules in arbitrary dimension d, and it uses them to produce the first explicit counterexamples to the Hasse principle for Drinfeld-Stuhler curves. The examples in Section 7 are concrete, with explicit polynomials p, q, K, and the criteria in Theorems 6.6, 6.10, and 6.13 are real number-theoretic conditions rather than tautologies. This is a solid step forward for the function-field analogue of the Shimura curve story.

The biggest soft spot is Proposition 3.3, which is load-bearing for the ramification bounds in Section 4 and hence for the main theorems. The stress-test note has a point: the proof claims that L/K is abelian and then reasons with Gal(L/K), but the subgroup H = Γθ N need not be normal in G_K. So as written, the degree bound [L:K] ≤ q^d − 1 is not justified. I cannot call this a fatal flaw, because there is an easy repair: N is normal in G_K, and the inertia quotient I_K/N injects into Aut_k(φbar) through reduction. That gives exactly the same bound. The authors should rewrite the last paragraph of the proof along those lines and stop talking about Gal(L/K) when they mean the inertia quotient. Until that is done, the proof of Proposition 3.3 is incomplete.

The other concerns are more minor. The paper leans heavily on prior results from [23] and [25], and on Magma computations that are not shipped. The finite sets P and P′ are explicit enough that the computations can in principle be reproduced, but the authors should say exactly what was computed and make the verification reproducible, especially because the counterexamples depend on those checks. The congruence arguments in Sections 5–6 look coherent to me, and I did not find hidden circularity.

Overall: this is an important paper with credible, checkable results. It deserves a serious referee, but the referee should be asked to verify Proposition 3.3 carefully and to get the authors to clean up the proof and document the Magma computations. I would bring it to a reading group, and I would cite it if I worked in this area.

Referee Report

1 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper develops a theory of canonical isogeny characters for Drinfeld-Stuhler modules over F_q(T), analogous to Jordan's theory for abelian surfaces with quaternionic multiplication. It proves that a Drinfeld-Stuhler module over a local field acquires good reduction over a totally tamely ramified extension of degree dividing q^d-1 (Proposition 3.3), uses this to control the ramification of the canonical isogeny characters (Proposition 4.8), and then derives three global criteria (Theorems 6.6, 6.10, 6.13) for the absence of K-rational points on Drinfeld-Stuhler varieties. In the quaternionic dimension d=2 case, the criteria are combined with the local results of [23] to produce explicit pairs (X_D,K) for which X_D(K)=∅ while X_D(K_v)≠∅ for every completion K_v, thereby giving explicit violations of the Hasse principle (Examples 7.7, 7.8, 7.10).

Significance. If the local input in Proposition 3.3 is made fully rigorous, the paper represents a substantial contribution: it extends the canonical isogeny character method to Drinfeld-Stuhler modules in arbitrary dimension d, not just quaternion algebras and curves, and it provides effective criteria for non-existence of rational points together with explicit counterexamples to the Hasse principle over function fields. The explicitness of the criteria is a real strength: the finite sets P'(y,s) and P(y,s) in Theorems 6.10 and 6.13 are computable, the arithmetic conditions in the examples are concrete, and the Magma verifications, while not shipped as code, are described in enough detail to be reproduced. The paper also engages carefully with the field-of-moduli-versus-field-of-definition issue for coarse moduli schemes, using the earlier results of [25] and [23]. The main weakness is that Proposition 3.3, which underpins Propositions 4.8 and the two class-group and congruence criteria, is proved by an argument that contains a genuine gap in its final degree bound.

major comments (1)

[Section 3, proof of Proposition 3.3] The subgroup H = Γ_θ N of G_K is not shown to be normal, so the extension L/K cut out by H need not be Galois; nevertheless the proof then speaks of 'Gal(L/K)' and uses the fixed field of the subgroup generated by a single element g of that so-called Galois group. This invalidates the argument bounding [L:K] by q^d-1 as written. The gap is load-bearing because Proposition 3.3 is used to bound the ramification of the canonical isogeny characters in Proposition 4.8, to prove the surjectivity in Lemma 6.5, and to justify the reduction arguments in Theorems 6.10 and 6.13. A natural repair is to work directly with the finite quotient I_K/N and its faithful action on T_p(φ̅), applying the Taguchi–Tamagawa isogeny theorem to bound the degree without asserting that the minimal good-reduction extension is abelian; the authors need to supply such a complete argument.

minor comments (6)

[Section 1, first paragraph] The name 'Drinfeld-Shutler modules' in the first sentence of the introduction should be 'Drinfeld-Stuhler modules'.
[Section 2, definition of Drinfeld-Stuhler module] In condition (ii) of the definition, 'identity matirx' should be 'identity matrix'.
[Theorems 6.10 and 6.13] The assumptions write 'D ⊗ K ≅ M_d(K)' and 'D ⊗ K ≅ M_2(K)' without a base; these should read 'D ⊗_F K ≅ M_d(K)' and 'D ⊗_F K ≅ M_2(K)' respectively.
[Definition 6.9] W(y) is said to consist of elements π of F, but condition (2) [F(π):F]=d is impossible for π∈F; the definition should specify elements of a fixed algebraic closure of F.
[Section 6.3, Definition 6.9] The formula for n' in the definition of D'(y,s) appears garbled in the text; it should be displayed consistently with the quantity n in Proposition 6.8 when s=deg(p), namely n' = d(q^{sd}-1)/((q^s-1)(q^d-1)).
[Section 6.3] The word 'claracter' appears twice in the text around the definition of ε and should be corrected to 'character'.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the canonical-isogeny criteria are derived, and the Hasse-principle examples are genuine outputs, not fitted inputs.

full rationale

I walked the derivation chain from Section 3 through Sections 6 and 7. The canonical isogeny character is defined from the unique canonical subgroup C_{φ,p} of φ[p] and its properties are proved from the p-divisible group Lubin-Tate argument and from the potentially-good-reduction result; they are not assumed or fitted. The finite obstruction sets P'(y,s) and P(y,s) are defined from explicit algebraic data attached to Frobenius elements, and Theorems 6.10 and 6.13 show that a hypothetical K-point would force congruences contradicting the exclusions p∉P'(y,deg(p)) or p∉P(y,deg(p)). The Hasse-principle counterexamples in Section 7 combine these non-existence criteria with independent local-point results from [23]; the local and global parts come from different sources, so the violations are not built into the assumptions. The paper does cite the third author's prior work, especially [25], for foundational facts such as the field-of-moduli versus field-of-definition correspondence, the Morita equivalence, and automorphism groups of Drinfeld-Stuhler modules over finite fields. These are published, parameter-free theorems whose statements do not include the Hasse-principle conclusions of the present paper, so they function as ordinary mathematical dependencies rather than as a circular self-citation chain. The proof gap flagged in Proposition 3.3 concerning the normality of the extension cut out by ΓθN is a potential correctness issue in an internal proof step, not a reduction of a prediction to its inputs; a proof gap is not circularity under the stated criteria. Overall, the derivation is self-contained in the relevant sense, and no step equates an output with an input by construction.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 7 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no fitted parameters and no ad hoc entities. The canonical subgroup and character are canonical constructions from the given data. The central claim relies on a set of prior theorems, especially from the third author's earlier papers [19]-[25] and Laumon-Rapoport-Stuhler [17]; these are treated as input assumptions.

assumptions (7)

domain assumption X_D exists as a coarse moduli scheme of D-elliptic sheaves, is geometrically connected, and is proper when D is a central division algebra.
Invoked in Section 2; cited to [17, Thm 4.1, Thm 6.1] and [4].
domain assumption The category of Drinfeld-Stuhler O_D-modules over K is equivalent to the category of D-elliptic sheaves over K modulo an action of Z.
Invoked in Section 2 and throughout; cited to [25, Section 3].
domain assumption If K splits D (O_D tensor K is isomorphic to M_d(K)), then every K-rational point on X_D corresponds to a Drinfeld-Stuhler module defined over K.
Theorem 6.1, cited to [25, Cor 6.17]; used to pass from non-existence of modules to X_D(K)=empty in the main theorems.
domain assumption The local Diophantine results of [23] describing when X_D has K_v-points (Theorems 7.1, 7.3, 7.5) are correct.
Used in Section 7 to check the Hasse principle violations; the results are imported wholesale from [23].
domain assumption The Riemann hypothesis for Anderson t-motives holds, giving the bound on coefficients of the Frobenius polynomial (RH).
Used in Prop 5.3 and Cor 5.4 to control deg(a_i) and to show W(y) is finite; cited to [10, Thm 5.6.10].
domain assumption Gardeyn's Galois criterion characterizes good reduction of t-motives and is valid for Drinfeld-Stuhler modules.
Used crucially in Theorem 3.2 and Prop 3.3 to deduce good reduction from unramified Tate module; cited to [7].
domain assumption The Tate conjecture for t-modules (Taguchi-Tamagawa) holds, identifying endomorphisms with Galois-invariant endomorphisms of the Tate module.
Used in Prop 3.3 to bound the automorphism group of the reduction; cited to [32].

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Drinfeld-Stuhler modules and the Hasse principle." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/2LFHVSAG

@misc{pith2026190808678,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Drinfeld-Stuhler modules and the Hasse principle},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/2LFHVSAG}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1908.08678}
}

abstract

We develop a theory of canonical isogeny characters of Drinfeld-Stuhler modules similar to the theory of canonical isogeny characters of abelian surfaces with quaternionic multiplication. We then apply this theory to give explicit criteria for the non-existence of rational points on Drinfeld-Stuhler modular varieties over the finite extensions of $\mathbb{F}_q(T)$. This allows us to produce explicit examples of Drinfeld-Stuhler curves violating the Hasse principle.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

34 extracted references · 34 canonical work pages

[23]

Local Diophantine properties of modular curves of D-elliptic sheaves

Papikian, M. Local Diophantine properties of modular curves of D-elliptic sheaves. J. Reine Angew. Math. 664 (2012), 115–140. 30 KEISUKE ARAI, SATOSHI KONDO, AND MIHRAN PAPIKIAN

work page 2012
[25]

Drinfeld-Stuhler modules

Papikian, M. Drinfeld-Stuhler modules. Res. Math. Sci. 5 , 4 (2018), Paper No. 40, 33

work page 2018
[1]

Anderson, G. W. t-motives. Duke Math. J. 53 , 2 (1986), 457–502

work page 1986
[2]

Non-existence of points rational over number ﬁelds on Shimura cur ves

Arai, K. Non-existence of points rational over number ﬁelds on Shimura cur ves. Acta Arith. 172 , 3 (2016), 243–250

work page 2016
[3]

Rational points on Shimura curves and the Manin obstruction

Arai, K. Rational points on Shimura curves and the Manin obstruction. Nagoya Math. J. 230 (2018), 144–159

work page 2018
[4]

Drinfeld modules and elliptic sheaves

Blum, A., and Stuhler, U. Drinfeld modules and elliptic sheaves. In Vector bundles on curves—new directions (Cetraro, 1995) , vol. 1649 of Lecture Notes in Math. Springer, 1997, pp. 110–193

work page 1995
[5]

Clark, P. L. On the Hasse principle for Shimura curves. Israel J. Math. 171 (2009), 349–365

work page 2009
[6]

Drinfeld, V. G. Elliptic modules. Mat. Sb. (N.S.) 94 (1974), 594–627

work page 1974

Show all 34 references

[7]

A Galois criterion for good reduction of τ-sheaves

Gardeyn, F. A Galois criterion for good reduction of τ-sheaves. J. Number Theory 97 , 2 (2002), 447–471

2002
[8]

The structure of analytic τ-sheaves

Gardeyn, F. The structure of analytic τ-sheaves. J. Number Theory 100 , 2 (2003), 332–362

2003
[9]

On ﬁnite Drinfeld modules

Gekeler, E.-U. On ﬁnite Drinfeld modules. J. Algebra 141 , 1 (1991), 187–203

1991
[10]

Basic structures of function ﬁeld arithmetic , vol

Goss, D. Basic structures of function ﬁeld arithmetic , vol. 35 of Ergebnisse der Mathematik und ihrer Grenzgebiete (3) . Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1996

1996
[11]

Uniformisation des vari´ et´ es de Laumon-Rapoport-Stuhler et conjecture de Drinfeld- Carayol

Hausberger, T. Uniformisation des vari´ et´ es de Laumon-Rapoport-Stuhler et conjecture de Drinfeld- Carayol. Ann. Inst. Fourier (Grenoble) 55 , 4 (2005), 1285–1371

2005
[12]

Hayes, D. R. Explicit class ﬁeld theory in global function ﬁelds. In Studies in algebra and number theory , vol. 6 of Adv. in Math. Suppl. Stud. Academic Press, New York-London, 1979, pp. 173–217

1979
[13]

Jordan, B. W. Points on Shimura curves rational over number ﬁelds. J. Reine Angew. Math. 371 (1986), 92–114

1986
[14]

W., and Livn ´ e, R

Jordan, B. W., and Livn ´ e, R. A. Local Diophantine properties of Shimura curves. Math. Ann. 270 , 2 (1985), 235–248

1985
[15]

Chtoucas de Drinfeld et conjecture de Ramanujan-Petersson

Lafforgue, L. Chtoucas de Drinfeld et conjecture de Ramanujan-Petersson. Ast´ erisque, 243 (1997), ii+329

1997
[16]

Cohomology of Drinfeld modular varieties

Laumon, G. Cohomology of Drinfeld modular varieties. Part I , vol. 41 of Cambridge Studies in Advanced Mathematics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1996. Geometry, count ing of points and local harmonic analysis

1996
[17]

D-elliptic sheaves and the Langlands correspondence

Laumon, G., Rapoport, M., and Stuhler, U. D-elliptic sheaves and the Langlands correspondence. Invent. Math. 113 , 2 (1993), 217–338

1993
[18]

Rational isogenies of prime degree (with an appendix by D

Mazur, B. Rational isogenies of prime degree (with an appendix by D. Goldfeld). Invent. Math. 44 , 2 (1978), 129–162

1978
[19]

Genus formula for modular curves of D-elliptic sheaves

Papikian, M. Genus formula for modular curves of D-elliptic sheaves. Arch. Math. (Basel) 92 , 3 (2009), 237–250

2009
[20]

Modular varieties of D-elliptic sheaves and the Weil-Deligne bound

Papikian, M. Modular varieties of D-elliptic sheaves and the Weil-Deligne bound. J. Reine Angew. Math. 626 (2009), 115–134

2009
[21]

On hyperelliptic modular curves over function ﬁelds

Papikian, M. On hyperelliptic modular curves over function ﬁelds. Arch. Math. (Basel) 92 , 4 (2009), 291–302

2009
[22]

Endomorphisms of exceptional D-elliptic sheaves

Papikian, M. Endomorphisms of exceptional D-elliptic sheaves. Math. Z. 266 , 2 (2010), 407–423

2010
[24]

D-elliptic sheaves and odd Jacobians

Papikian, M. D-elliptic sheaves and odd Jacobians. J. Number Theory 133 , 3 (2013), 1012–1026

2013
[26]

Poonen, B., and Voloch, J. F. The Brauer-Manin obstruction for subvarieties of abelian varieties over function ﬁelds. Ann. of Math. (2) 171 , 1 (2010), 511–532

2010
[27]

Maximal orders, vol

Reiner, I. Maximal orders, vol. 28 of London Mathematical Society Monographs. New Series. The Claren- don Press, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2003. Corrected r eprint of the 1975 original, With a foreword by M. J. Taylor

2003
[28]

Number theory in function ﬁelds , vol

Rosen, M. Number theory in function ﬁelds , vol. 210 of Graduate Texts in Mathematics . Springer-Verlag, New York, 2002

2002
[29]

Propri´ et´ es galoisiennes des points d’ordre ﬁni des courbes elliptiques

Serre, J.-P. Propri´ et´ es galoisiennes des points d’ordre ﬁni des courbes elliptiques. Invent. Math. 15 , 4 (1972), 259–331

1972
[30]

Local ﬁelds, vol

Serre, J.-P. Local ﬁelds, vol. 67 of Graduate Texts in Mathematics . Springer-Verlag, New York-Berlin, 1979

1979
[31]

On t-motifs

Taelman, L. On t-motifs. 2007. Thesis (Ph.D.)–The University of Groningen

2007
[32]

The Tate conjecture for t-motives

Taguchi, Y. The Tate conjecture for t-motives. Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 123 , 11 (1995), 3285–3287

1995
[33]

Good reduction of elliptic modules

Takahashi, T. Good reduction of elliptic modules. J. Math. Soc. Japan 34 , 3 (1982), 475–487

1982
[34]

Tate, J. T. p-divisible groups. In Proc. Conf. Local Fields (Driebergen, 1966) . Springer, Berlin, 1967, pp. 158–183. Department of Mathematics, School of Science and Technolog y for Future Life, Tokyo Denki University, 5 Senju Asahi-cho, Adachi-ku, Tokyo 120- 8551, Japan E-ma...

1966

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [23]

Local Diophantine properties of modular curves of D-elliptic sheaves

Papikian, M. Local Diophantine properties of modular curves of D-elliptic sheaves. J. Reine Angew. Math. 664 (2012), 115–140. 30 KEISUKE ARAI, SATOSHI KONDO, AND MIHRAN PAPIKIAN

work page 2012

[2] [25]

Drinfeld-Stuhler modules

Papikian, M. Drinfeld-Stuhler modules. Res. Math. Sci. 5 , 4 (2018), Paper No. 40, 33

work page 2018

[3] [1]

Anderson, G. W. t-motives. Duke Math. J. 53 , 2 (1986), 457–502

work page 1986

[4] [2]

Non-existence of points rational over number ﬁelds on Shimura cur ves

Arai, K. Non-existence of points rational over number ﬁelds on Shimura cur ves. Acta Arith. 172 , 3 (2016), 243–250

work page 2016

[5] [3]

Rational points on Shimura curves and the Manin obstruction

Arai, K. Rational points on Shimura curves and the Manin obstruction. Nagoya Math. J. 230 (2018), 144–159

work page 2018

[6] [4]

Drinfeld modules and elliptic sheaves

Blum, A., and Stuhler, U. Drinfeld modules and elliptic sheaves. In Vector bundles on curves—new directions (Cetraro, 1995) , vol. 1649 of Lecture Notes in Math. Springer, 1997, pp. 110–193

work page 1995

[7] [5]

Clark, P. L. On the Hasse principle for Shimura curves. Israel J. Math. 171 (2009), 349–365

work page 2009

[8] [6]

Drinfeld, V. G. Elliptic modules. Mat. Sb. (N.S.) 94 (1974), 594–627

work page 1974