REVIEW 1 cited by
$L_p$ Isotonic Regression Algorithms Using an $L_0$ Approach
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
abstract
Significant advances in flow algorithms have changed the relative performance of various approaches to algorithms for $L_p$ isotonic regression. We show a simple plug-in method to systematically incorporate such advances, and advances in determining violator dags, with no assumptions about the algorithms' structures. The method is based on the standard algorithm for $L_0$ (Hamming distance) isotonic regression (by finding anti-chains in a violator dag), coupled with partitioning based on binary $L_1$ isotonic regression. For several important classes of graphs the algorithms are already faster (in O-notation) than previously published ones, close to or at the lower bound, and significantly faster than those implemented in statistical packages. We consider exact and approximate results for $L_p$ regressions, $p=0$ and $1 \leq p < \infty$, and a variety of orderings.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Aggregate-then-Calibrate for Human-centered Assessment with Theoretical Guarantees
Aggregate-then-Calibrate projects model scores onto a human-derived consensus ranking, claiming theoretical guarantees over model-only assessment; the central proofs have important gaps.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.