Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

$L_p$ Isotonic Regression Algorithms Using an $L_0$ Approach

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2107.00251 v3 pith:2LPYBMIG submitted 2021-07-01 cs.DS

classification cs.DS
keywords algorithmsisotonicregressionadvancesfastermethodviolatoralgorithm
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
abstract

Significant advances in flow algorithms have changed the relative performance of various approaches to algorithms for $L_p$ isotonic regression. We show a simple plug-in method to systematically incorporate such advances, and advances in determining violator dags, with no assumptions about the algorithms' structures. The method is based on the standard algorithm for $L_0$ (Hamming distance) isotonic regression (by finding anti-chains in a violator dag), coupled with partitioning based on binary $L_1$ isotonic regression. For several important classes of graphs the algorithms are already faster (in O-notation) than previously published ones, close to or at the lower bound, and significantly faster than those implemented in statistical packages. We consider exact and approximate results for $L_p$ regressions, $p=0$ and $1 \leq p < \infty$, and a variety of orderings.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Aggregate-then-Calibrate for Human-centered Assessment with Theoretical Guarantees

    cs.LG 2026-08 reject novelty 5.0 of 10

    Aggregate-then-Calibrate projects model scores onto a human-derived consensus ranking, claiming theoretical guarantees over model-only assessment; the central proofs have important gaps.

Pith tools