Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 132 references

ATOM: Geometry-Aware Microgesture towards Object-Agnostic Tangible Interaction

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-16 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Corners, edges, and surfaces on everyday objects can become tap, slide, and swipe controls without per-object authoring.

desk verdict A genuinely useful integration of foundation models and human factors for on-object microgestures; the ablation story is credible, but the 'object-agnostic' claim should be scoped to offline-cached elements. read the letter →

arxiv 2608.11871 v1 pith:2M7SNGPH submitted 2026-08-12 cs.HC

Yinqiao Wang , Hao Xu , Qixuan Liu , Shengdong Zhao , Pheng-Ann Heng , Chi-Wing Fu This is my paper · ORCID
classification cs.HC
keywords tangibleinteractionmicrogestureaugmentedrealitygeometricelementsgenerative3Denhancement2Drefinementusabilityanalysisobject-agnostic
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

ATOM claims that the small geometric features already present on everyday objects—protruding corners, sharp edge segments, and flat surface patches—are enough to turn any handheld object into a tangible interface, without matching the prop to a virtual counterpart. The paper builds a fingertip-aware detection pipeline that finds these fine features only where a finger can reach, cleans noisy object geometry with generative 3D and 2D models, and then ranks the detected elements by ergonomic usability. In the main ablation study the full pipeline completed all trials and beat each ablated version on task completion, system usability, and workload, and a second study kept low failure rates across ten objects. If the claim holds, AR users could control digital functions by tapping, sliding, and swiping the objects already in their hands, with no per-object authoring.

What carries the argument

The carrying mechanism is the fingertip-aware detection-and-ranking pipeline. It restricts the search for interaction elements to a reachable volume computed from a parameterized hand model with collision filtering, which both shrinks the problem and makes the results physically usable. Noisy scans are cleaned twice: a generative 3D mesh model sharpens the geometry, and a generative image model simplifies the 2D edge map, with the simplified sketch warped back into alignment so detected elements stay on the physical object. A weighted usability score then discards elements that are blocked, ambiguous, too small, or too smooth, and selects the top corner, edge, and surface for each degree of freedom. This chain of reachability, enhancement, and ergonomic ranking is what turns raw geometry into controls a user can reliably operate.

What would settle it

Scan a small object with one fine feature deliberately occluded, run the full pipeline, and measure the Chamfer distance between the pre- and post-enhancement geometries over that feature; if the displacement exceeds the system's own 0.5 cm fingertip-contact threshold, the detected tap or slide target no longer overlaps the physical one, and the reported task-completion benefit should disappear in a replication.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper sets out to show that fine-grained local geometry is a universal tangible affordance: protruding corners, sharp edge segments, and flat surface patches on an everyday object can be mapped to 0D taps, 1D slides, and 2D swipes, so no object-level match between a physical prop and a virtual controller is needed. ATOM detects those elements only inside the fingertip's reachable space, enhances the scanned object with a generative 3D mesh model, cleans the resulting edge map with a generative image model, and then ranks candidates by reaching cost, accessibility, hand and fingertip ergonomics, gesture ambiguity, and geometric sharpness. The empirical claim is that this full pipeline completed every trial in the main user study, outperformed all three ablations on subjective usability and workload, and produced low failure rates across ten objects in a second study.

Load-bearing premise

The object-agnostic claim rests on the assumption that each object can be scanned once in advance and that the two generative cleaning steps preserve, rather than distort, the small corners, edges, and surfaces the interactions depend on.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • With the full pipeline, users completed 100 percent of trials across all three tasks in Study 1, while every ablation produced failures, so each generative stage and the usability filter earns its place.
  • Completion times around 4.91 seconds for 1D seeking and 7.53 seconds for 2D panning, with the smallest across-object variance of any condition, imply the same gesture vocabulary behaves consistently on objects of different shape and size.
  • SUS of 74.75 versus 54.50 and NASA-TLX of 27.50 versus 41.17 over the best baseline indicate the detected elements feel more usable and less effortful, not merely more detectable.
  • Failure rates of 6.67, 1.67, and 2.43 percent across ten objects in Study 2 support transfer across objects and grasps once each object has been pre-scanned.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A testable extension the paper does not run: extract the same corner–edge–surface vocabulary from the AR device's live scene mesh instead of an offline pre-scan; if detection accuracy stays near the reported level, the system would approach true object-agnostic interaction instead of object-set-specific interaction.
  • An inference left implicit: the five usability factors are independent of the generative stages, so they could rank elements from any future detector, including learned ones; the ergonomic formulation may be the most portable part of the contribution.
  • The paper's 0D results—comparable accuracy with a reachable but geometrically wrong corner—suggest that for discrete taps, usability filtering matters more than geometric correctness, which implies a redesign could trade detection precision for speed on 0D controls.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper presents ATOM, a system that turns everyday handheld objects into AR tangible interfaces by detecting fine-grained geometric elements (corners, edges, and surfaces) in fingertip-reachable regions and mapping them to 0D, 1D, and 2D microgestures. The pipeline combines hand/object pose tracking, Canny edge detection on rendered normal maps, generative 3D enhancement via Hunyuan3D, generative 2D refinement via Gemini sketch simplification with ORB/RANSAC alignment, MANO-based reachability modeling, a five-factor usability scoring model, and a contact/voting interaction loop. The authors report two user studies: Study 1 (12 participants, within-subjects, 3 objects, 3 tasks, 4 trials per cell) compares the full pipeline against three ablations and reports 0% failed trials for the full system, significantly better completion times for the 1D and 2D tasks, and higher SUS/lower NASA-TLX scores; Study 2 extends to 10 objects under two poses and reports low failure rates; a system-level evaluation reports tracking stability and detection accuracy. The title and abstract claim 'object-agnostic' tangible interaction.

Significance. If supported, ATOM would be a useful contribution to opportunistic tangible AR interaction: the unified 0D/1D/2D metaphor over local geometry is elegant, and using generative foundation models to regularize noisy meshes and edge maps is a plausible way to avoid per-object training. The ablation study is well designed (within-subjects, counterbalanced, 1,728 planned trials), and the authors are admirably explicit about limitations, including non-real-time detection and occlusion sensitivity. However, the central 'object-agnostic' claim is materially narrower than what is demonstrated: because every object must be scanned offline (~10h) and per-pose detection runs offline (~2min) before elements are cached, the user studies exercise interaction with pre-computed caches under fixed poses, not runtime discovery on novel objects. The detection-accuracy evidence also lacks objective ground truth and inter-rater reliability metrics. These issues do not invalidate the cached-element framework, but they require either new evidence or a re-scoped claim.

major comments (4)
  1. [Abstract; Supplementary §3 'Setup requirements'; §6.1.1] The title and abstract claim 'object-agnostic' tangible interaction, but the system as evaluated is not object-agnostic at use time. The supplementary setup states that each object must be scanned offline with RealityKit Object Capture (~10h, object static and visible), and that for each grasp pose, 2D refinement (~20s), detection (~2min), and usability analysis (~10s) run before elements are cached; the online loop only performs contact detection on cached elements. Study 1 instructed participants to grasp objects in predefined poses, so detection had already succeeded offline for those poses, and Study 2 used only two fixed poses per object. The 100% task completion in Table 1 and the SUS/TLX results therefore demonstrate reliable interaction with pre-detected, cached elements under controlled postures, not generalization to novel objects or arbitrary grasps at runtime. The Limitations section concedes that detection is 'not real time.' The 'object-agnostic' claim should be re-scoped to pre-scanned objects after offline detection, or the paper should add an evaluation in which novel objects and unconstrained grasps are processed without pre-caching.
  2. [§6.3 'Detection accuracy'; §6.2] The central detection-accuracy claim rests on an unvalidated subjective assessment. The paper states that 'two independent users assess whether each detected element in User Study 2 is correct' and reports 'around 62%' before and 'above 90%' after usability analysis, but it gives no definition of 'correct,' no per-object/per-pose counts, no confidence intervals, and no inter-rater reliability statistic such as Cohen's kappa. Without agreement information, the two raters may simply reproduce the authors' criteria, and 'above 90%' cannot be assessed. Because Q1 in Study 1 is specifically about detection accuracy and the objective 0D accuracy is not significantly different from the best baseline (p>0.05), the paper should supply an objective or grounded accuracy protocol, and should report detection rates per object and per DoF.
  3. [Eq. (6); Supplementary 'Hyperparameters'] The usability weights and hard thresholds in the scoring function are load-bearing for the 'ours w/o UA' ablation, but their derivation is not reported in a way that prevents overfitting concerns. The supplementary states that the weights are 'empirically set ... from preliminary experiments' (w_rch=3.0, w_shp=3.0, etc.), and the thresholds (60% blocked, 30° sharpness, 1 cm, 4 cm²) appear hand-picked. If these values were tuned on the same objects and interaction tasks used in Study 1, the comparison between the full system and the no-UA baseline partly reflects the tuning rather than the general principle of usability analysis. The paper should report the preliminary experiment and tuning procedure, and ideally a sensitivity analysis or cross-validation across objects; at minimum it should state which objects and poses were used to set the weights and thresholds.
  4. [§6.1.2; Table 1] The statistical reporting is incomplete in ways that affect the strength of the headline claims. Table 1 gives failure percentages without absolute counts or denominators, and no inferential test is applied to failure rates despite the large differences (e.g., 69.79% vs 0.00% in the 2D task). The completion-time analyses exclude skipped trials as timeouts, which can bias comparisons when failure rates differ across conditions. The paper also reports 'all with p<0.05' for the custom Likert questions in Figure 13 without giving test statistics, means, or SDs. In addition, the 1D comparison with 'ours w/o UA' is not significant (p=0.244) and the 0D accuracy is not significantly different from the best baseline, so the Discussion should state those outcomes more cautiously. A complete reporting of the RM-ANOVA results, effect sizes, and failure-rate tests, or an explicit labeling of failure rates as descriptive, is needed to support the 'full pipeline outperforms ablations' conclusion.
minor comments (5)
  1. [§6.1.1; Supplementary §2] The procedure says target values were randomized, but the supplementary lists fixed arrays of initial/target timestamps and pan targets; please clarify whether the values were randomized per participant or fixed with trial order randomized.
  2. [Eq. (1)] Equation (1) is described as the proportion of rays blocked, but the formula sums ray hits without dividing by N×M; either normalize the expression or revise the description.
  3. [Figure 5] The label 'Warping Affinement' appears to be a typo for 'Warping Alignment' or 'Affine Refinement'; please correct.
  4. [§6.3] The tracking robustness protocol measures pose stability with the object stationary against a moving headset; this does not directly quantify occlusion by the interacting hand, so the claim that tracking stays within contact thresholds at <50% occlusion should distinguish head-motion stability from hand-occlusion robustness.
  5. [§6.2] Study 2 reports only aggregate failed-trial rates and means; per-object results would help identify which objects and grasps are easy or hard and would strengthen the generalizability claim.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the core detection pipeline and ablation comparisons are self-contained; the offline pre-scan limits scope but does not make the derivation circular.

full rationale

The central derivation chain is not circular. The detection pipeline (Section 4.2) combines Canny edge detection, Harris corners, DBSCAN, and generative 3D/2D enhancement; each component is an external method or a clearly specified addition, and the ablations (w/o Gen 3D, w/o Gen 2D, w/o UA) are evaluated on user task performance rather than on quantities that the components were fitted to reproduce. The usability weights in Eq. (6) are stated as empirical design choices from preliminary observations (Supplementary 'Hyperparameters'), not as parameters fitted to the reported SUS/TLX or task-completion data, and the 'ours w/o UA' ablation removes the whole usability ranking rather than predicting from the fitted weights. Author self-citations appear only in the related-work list for 3D modeling and hand-mesh reconstruction and are not load-bearing for the ATOM claims. The main limitation is a scope mismatch, not circularity: the supplementary 'Setup requirements' state that object scanning and per-pose element detection are offline and cached, so the user studies exercise cached elements under predefined poses; this weakens the 'object-agnostic' generalization claim but does not reduce any equation or prediction to its own input. No step was found where Eq. X equals Eq. Y by construction or where a fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction.

Assumptions & free parameters 8 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 1 invented entities

No genuinely new physical or mathematical entities are introduced. The load-bearing extras are the hand-set usability weights, filtering thresholds, contact heuristics, and the assumptions that generative models clean geometry without distorting interaction-relevant features. These are fitting-style choices that directly affect the headline improvements over ablations.

free parameters (8)
  • Usability weights w_rch, w_acc, w_erg, w_abg, w_shp = 3.0, 1.0, 1.0, 0.5, 3.0
    Set 'empirically' from preliminary experiments (supplementary Hyperparameters). These weights directly determine which elements are selected in the full pipeline and thus influence the main study's usability and task-performance outcomes.
  • Threshold: accessibility blocked > 60% = 60% of emitted rays blocked
    Established as a hard filter for physical feasibility (supplementary Hyperparameters). The value is chosen by hand and affects which candidates survive to ranking.
  • Threshold: sharpness average angle < 30 deg = 30 degrees
    Used to filter out false-positive corners/edges. The cutoff is hand-chosen and affects which elements are considered sharp enough for tactile feedback.
  • Threshold: minimum edge length and surface area = edge shorter than 1 cm; surface smaller than 4 cm^2
    Hand-set thresholds to mitigate fat-finger effects. They remove small candidates before ranking.
  • Threshold: proximity to other candidates = 1 cm
    Points within 1 cm of other candidate elements are filtered out to reduce ambiguity. This value is hand-picked.
  • Contact thresholds: proximity < 0.5 cm, motion > 2.5 cm/s = Proximity 0.5 cm, speed 2.5 cm/s
    Used to detect contact and active finger. These values are stated as heuristics without user-based tuning or validation.
  • Voting temporal window size = 10 frames
    Used to determine which geometric element is contacted. The value is chosen by the authors without reported ablation.
  • Dwell time for task success = 1 second
    Set for 1D/2D task success in studies; directly affects completion time.
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption Canny edge detection on object normal maps yields a useful skeleton for finding interaction-relevant geometric elements.
    Used throughout the detection pipeline (Section 4.2). The paper handles noise via generative models but does not evaluate Canny against alternative edge detectors.
  • domain assumption Foundation image model output 'Clean and simplify this sketch' can be aligned back to the original edge map via ORB + RANSAC affine transformation without losing interaction-critical topology.
    Section 4.2. The paper provides qualitative examples but no systematic evaluation of alignment error or topology preservation for fine-grained features.
  • domain assumption Hunyuan3D generates a mesh that is cleaner but geometrically faithful enough for interaction regions after point-cloud registration.
    Section 4.2 and Figure 4. The paper acknowledges failures when regions are occluded, but the main pipeline assumes this holds generally.
  • ad hoc to paper The usability factors (reachability, accessibility, ergonomics, ambiguity, sharpness) with the chosen weights correspond to user preference.
    Eq. (5) and supplementary hyperparameters. The weights and filtering thresholds are set by the authors from preliminary experiments, not derived from an independent model or benchmark.
  • domain assumption MANO joint ranges from Nielsen et al. and the penetration filtering yield a physically plausible fingertip reachable space.
    Section 4.2 and Algorithm 1. The paper relies on the joint range data and the libigl collision functions without validating them on their objects.
  • ad hoc to paper The placement of four contact samples around the fingertip plus a 10-frame voting window correctly identifies the intended element.
    Section 4.4. No ablation or accuracy analysis is given for the voting mechanism or contact sampling.
invented entities (1)
  • The ATOM pipeline itself as a system-level construct
    purpose: To organize the combination of 3D enhancement, 2D refinement, reachability modeling, usability analysis, and real-time interaction into a single framework.
    The components are existing models/algorithms; ATOM is a new integration plus usability heuristics. The added value is the integration and the heuristics, which are evaluated only through the authors' user studies with no shipped artifacts.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of ATOM: Geometry-Aware Microgesture towards Object-Agnostic Tangible Interaction." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/2M7SNGPH

@misc{pith2026260811871,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: ATOM: Geometry-Aware Microgesture towards Object-Agnostic Tangible Interaction},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/2M7SNGPH}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2608.11871}
}
read the original abstract

This paper presents ATOM, an integrated framework towards agnostic and tangible object interactions with microgestures. Our goal is to support microgesture interactions across different everyday objects, with the capability to automatically leverage the geometric affordance of each object. We formulate a fingertip-aware detection pipeline to leverage generative 2D and 3D models for geometry enhancement and refinement. We then introduce a usability-based method to prioritize the detected elements based on their ergonomic suitability for interactions. Building on this foundation, we further develop an AR system to transform everyday handheld objects into tangible user interfaces with 0D, 1D, and 2D microgesture interactions. Across transitions among everyday cooking objects of varying shapes and sizes, ATOM outperformed ablation baselines in task completion, usability (SUS), and workload (NASA-TLX). A further study with 10 objects demonstrates ATOM's generalizability across objects and grasps, highlighting its potential towards fluid, object-agnostic tangible interaction in real-world AR scenarios.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2608.11871 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Our method is able to detect corners (red), edges (yellow), and surfaces (blue) on different everyday objects and provide [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p001_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Illustrating our workflow. microgestures in the context of grasping objects, based on various sensing technologies [41, 43, 56, 58, 61]. Another line of research explores adaptive design for microgestures on grasping objects. Sharma et al. [60] conduct an elicitation study to categorize mi￾crogestures performed on various representative objects. Joshi et al. [38] create a design space at varying hand pose constraint… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. The overview of our fingertip-aware detection pipeline. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (10 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Our generative 3D enhancement component. Cor [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Our usability analysis. 4.3 Fingertip-Aware Usability Analysis In the previous step, we detected all the available geometric ele￾ments that can be reached by the fingertip. Yet, there might exist multiple different elements ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Detected geometric elements (corners: red, edges: yellow, surfaces: blue) across various objects and grasping poses. The [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Four live-captured AR applications, in scenarios of a living room (a, b, d) and kitchen (c). [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: User study setup. Tasks. We designed a simulated kitchen scenario in which a user watches a cake-baking tutorial video ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_9.png]
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Completion time of 1D task [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_10.png]
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Completion time of 2D task. that our full pipeline achieved high accuracy (𝑀=98.41%, 𝑆𝐷=2.38), comparable with the highest-performing baseline ours w/o Gen 3D (𝑀=98.15%, 𝑆𝐷=2.19)(𝑝>0.05). This comparable performance is primarily due to the spatial tolerance inherent t…
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: SUS (↑:better) and NASA TLX (↓:better) scores [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_12.png]
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: Ratings of our additional Likert scale. and five custom questions (5-point): (i) Detection Accuracy: The detected elements are correctly found (e.g., corners are protruding, edges are sharp, and surfaces are flat on the physical object). (ii) User Accessibility: My fi…
Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: illustrates the impact of fingertip ergonomics used in our usability analysis. Interactions feel natural when the finger pad is oriented toward the target region, such as when using the thumb to touch a mug rim ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_1.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

132 extracted references · 22 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.09160 , year=

    Wonderverse: Extendable 3d scene generation with video generative models , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.09160 , year=

    arXiv

  2. [2]

    ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG) , volume=

    EXIM: A hybrid explicit-implicit representation for text-guided 3D shape generation , author=. ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG) , volume=

  3. [3]

    CNS-Edit++: Category-Agnostic 3D Editing with Coupled Neural Shape Representation

    CNS-Edit++: Category-Agnostic 3D Editing with Coupled Neural Shape Representation , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2607.16577 , year=

    work page Pith review arXiv

  4. [4]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2602.08198 , year=

    Pegasus: 3d personalization of geometry and appearance , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2602.08198 , year=

    arXiv

  5. [5]

    SIGGRAPH Asia 2023 Conference Papers , pages=

    Clipxplore: Coupled clip and shape spaces for 3d shape exploration , author=. SIGGRAPH Asia 2023 Conference Papers , pages=

    2023

  6. [6]

    SkelGen4D: Weakly-Supervised Skeleton-Based 4D Generation for Text-Driven Mesh Animation

    SkelGen4D: Weakly-Supervised Skeleton-Based 4D Generation for Text-Driven Mesh Animation , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2607.08246 , year=

    work page Pith review arXiv

  7. [7]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2602.05362 , year=

    Imagine a City: CityGenAgent for Procedural 3D City Generation , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2602.05362 , year=

    arXiv

  8. [8]

    Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , pages=

    coDrawAgents: A Multi-Agent Dialogue Framework for Compositional Image Generation , author=. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , pages=

Show all 132 references
  1. [9]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2604.10125 , year=

    PhyMix: Towards Physically Consistent Single-Image 3D Indoor Scene Generation with Implicit--Explicit Optimization , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2604.10125 , year=

    arXiv

  2. [10]

    Proceedings of SIGGRAPH Asia , pages=

    Hierarchical neural semantic representation for 3d semantic correspondence , author=. Proceedings of SIGGRAPH Asia , pages=

  3. [11]

    Proceedings of SIGGRAPH Asia , pages=

    Neural Wavelet-domain Diffusion for 3D Shape Generation , author=. Proceedings of SIGGRAPH Asia , pages=

  4. [12]

    ACM SIGGRAPH 2024 Conference Papers , year =

    CNS-Edit: 3D Shape Editing via Coupled Neural Shape Optimization , author =. ACM SIGGRAPH 2024 Conference Papers , year =

    2024

  5. [13]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2602.18735 , year=

    Las-comp: Zero-shot 3d completion with latent-spatial consistency , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2602.18735 , year=

  6. [14]

    2022 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) , pages=

    Neural template: Topology-aware reconstruction and disentangled generation of 3d meshes , author=. 2022 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) , pages=

    2022

  7. [15]

    ACM transactions on graphics , volume=

    Neural wavelet-domain diffusion for 3d shape generation, inversion, and manipulation , author=. ACM transactions on graphics , volume=

  8. [16]

    2023 , isbn =

    He, Fengming and Hu, Xiyun and Shi, Jingyu and Qian, Xun and Wang, Tianyi and Ramani, Karthik , title =. 2023 , isbn =. doi:10.1145/3544548.3580704 , booktitle =

    2023

  9. [17]

    2024 , issue_date =

    He, Fengming and Hu, Xiyun and Qian, Xun and Zhu, Zhengzhe and Ramani, Karthik , title =. 2024 , issue_date =. doi:10.1145/3698127 , journal =

    2024 doi

  10. [18]

    2020 , isbn =

    Zhou, Qian and Sykes, Sarah and Fels, Sidney and Kin, Kenrick , title =. 2020 , isbn =

    2020

  11. [19]

    2023 , isbn =

    Jain, Rahul and Shi, Jingyu and Duan, Runlin and Zhu, Zhengzhe and Qian, Xun and Ramani, Karthik , title =. 2023 , isbn =

    2023

  12. [20]

    2023 , isbn =

    Monteiro, Kyzyl and Vatsal, Ritik and Chulpongsatorn, Neil and Parnami, Aman and Suzuki, Ryo , title =. 2023 , isbn =. doi:10.1145/3544548.3581449 , booktitle =

    2023

  13. [21]

    Grasping Microgestures: Eliciting Single-hand Microgestures for Handheld Objects , year =

    Sharma, Adwait and Roo, Joan Sol and Steimle, J\". Grasping Microgestures: Eliciting Single-hand Microgestures for Handheld Objects , year =. doi:10.1145/3290605.3300632 , booktitle =

  14. [22]

    2023 , isbn =

    Kim, Jina and Kim, Minyung and Lee, Woo Suk and Yoon, Sang Ho , title =. 2023 , isbn =. doi:10.1145/3607822.3614544 , booktitle =

    2023

  15. [23]

    Grab-n-Go: On-the-Go Microgesture Recognition with Objects in Hand , year =

    Lee, Chi-Jung and Li, Jiaxin and Yu, Tianhong Catherine and Zhang, Ruidong and Gunda, Vipin and Guimbreti\`. Grab-n-Go: On-the-Go Microgesture Recognition with Objects in Hand , year =. doi:10.1145/3749469 , journal =

    doi

  16. [24]

    and Bhardwaj, Divyanshu and Fruchard, Bruno and McIntosh, Jess and Nittala, Aditya Shekhar and Klakow, Dietrich and Ashbrook, Daniel and Steimle, J\"

    Sharma, Adwait and Hedderich, Michael A. and Bhardwaj, Divyanshu and Fruchard, Bruno and McIntosh, Jess and Nittala, Aditya Shekhar and Klakow, Dietrich and Ashbrook, Daniel and Steimle, J\". SoloFinger: Robust Microgestures while Grasping Everyday Objects , year =. doi:10.114...

  17. [25]

    SparseIMU: Computational Design of Sparse IMU Layouts for Sensing Fine-grained Finger Microgestures , year =

    Sharma, Adwait and Salchow-H\". SparseIMU: Computational Design of Sparse IMU Layouts for Sensing Fine-grained Finger Microgestures , year =. doi:10.1145/3569894 , journal =

    doi

  18. [26]

    2025 , isbn =

    Caetano, Arthur and Luo, Yunhao and Sharma, Adwait and Sra, Misha , title =. 2025 , isbn =. doi:10.1145/3746059.3747744 , articleno =

    2025

  19. [27]

    STMG: A Machine Learning Microgesture Recognition System for Supporting Thumb-Based VR/AR Input , year =

    Kin, Kenrick and Wan, Chengde and Koh, Ken and Marin, Andrei and Camg\". STMG: A Machine Learning Microgesture Recognition System for Supporting Thumb-Based VR/AR Input , year =. doi:10.1145/3613904.3642702 , booktitle =

  20. [28]

    2025 , isbn =

    Kim, Jina and Zhang, Yang and Yoon, Sang Ho , title =. 2025 , isbn =. doi:10.1145/3706598.3713442 , booktitle =

    2025

  21. [29]

    2016 , isbn =

    Huang, Da-Yuan and Chan, Liwei and Yang, Shuo and Wang, Fan and Liang, Rong-Hao and Yang, De-Nian and Hung, Yi-Ping and Chen, Bing-Yu , title =. 2016 , isbn =. doi:10.1145/2858036.2858483 , booktitle =

    2016

  22. [30]

    FingerInput: Capturing Expressive Single-Hand Thumb-to-Finger Microgestures , year =

    Soliman, Mohamed and Mueller, Franziska and Hegemann, Lena and Roo, Joan Sol and Theobalt, Christian and Steimle, J\". FingerInput: Capturing Expressive Single-Hand Thumb-to-Finger Microgestures , year =. doi:10.1145/3279778.3279799 , booktitle =

  23. [31]

    2025 , isbn =

    Hsu, Ming-Yun and Chan, Liwei , title =. 2025 , isbn =. doi:10.1145/3706599.3720213 , booktitle =

    2025

  24. [32]

    and Schmandt, Chris , title =

    Kao, Hsin-Liu (Cindy) and Dementyev, Artem and Paradiso, Joseph A. and Schmandt, Chris , title =. 2015 , isbn =. doi:10.1145/2702123.2702572 , booktitle =

    2015

  25. [33]

    2021 , isbn =

    Sun, Wei and Li, Franklin Mingzhe and Huang, Congshu and Lei, Zhenyu and Steeper, Benjamin and Tao, Songyun and Tian, Feng and Zhang, Cheng , title =. 2021 , isbn =. doi:10.1145/3447526.3472060 , booktitle =

    2021

  26. [34]

    IEEE Access , volume=

    Micro Hand Gesture Recognition System Using Ultrasonic Active Sensing , author=. IEEE Access , volume=. 2018 , publisher=

    2018

  27. [35]

    2025 , issue_date =

    Han, Youfang and Zhao, Wei and Gao, Ge and Chen, Xiangjin and Yin, Jiliang and Wang, Lin and Meng, Xin and Yu, Yang and Zhang, Tengxiang , title =. 2025 , issue_date =. doi:10.1145/3729494 , journal =

    2025 doi

  28. [36]

    SkinRing: Ring-shaped Device Enabling Wear Direction-Independent Gesture Input on Side of Finger , year=

    Hanayama, Shogo and Kitamura, Riku and Yamamoto, Takumi and Amesaka, Takashi and Chan, Liwei and Sugiura, Yuta , booktitle=. SkinRing: Ring-shaped Device Enabling Wear Direction-Independent Gesture Input on Side of Finger , year=

  29. [37]

    2023 , isbn =

    Perella-Holfeld, Francisco and Faleel, Shariff AM and Irani, Pourang , title =. 2023 , isbn =. doi:10.1145/3563657.3596117 , booktitle =

    2023

  30. [38]

    2021 , issue_date =

    Liang, Chen and Yu, Chun and Qin, Yue and Wang, Yuntao and Shi, Yuanchun , title =. 2021 , issue_date =. doi:10.1145/3478114 , month = sep, articleno =

    2021 doi

  31. [39]

    2023 , isbn =

    Chaffangeon Caillet, Adrien and Goguey, Alix and Nigay, Laurence , title =. 2023 , isbn =. doi:10.1145/3544548.3580693 , booktitle =

    2023

  32. [40]

    2025 , issue_date =

    Li, Bu and Huang, Xincheng and Xiao, Robert , title =. 2025 , issue_date =. doi:10.1145/3733052 , journal =

    2025 doi

  33. [41]

    2023 , isbn =

    Kitamura, Riku and Yamamoto, Takumi and Sugiura, Yuta , title =. 2023 , isbn =. doi:10.1145/3594738.3611371 , booktitle =

    2023

  34. [42]

    2023 , isbn =

    Gong, Weilun and Santosa, Stephanie and Grossman, Tovi and Glueck, Michael and Clarke, Daniel and Lai, Frances , title =. 2023 , isbn =. doi:10.1145/3563657.3596032 , booktitle =

    2023

  35. [43]

    2024 , isbn =

    Pei, Siyou and Kim, David and Olwal, Alex and Zhang, Yang and Du, Ruofei , title =. 2024 , isbn =. doi:10.1145/3613904.3642220 , booktitle =

    2024

  36. [44]

    2025 , isbn =

    Gil, Hyunjae and Pratap, Ashish and Joseph, Iniyan and Kim, Jin Ryong , title =. 2025 , isbn =. doi:10.1145/3706598.3714056 , booktitle =

    2025

  37. [45]

    2016 , isbn =

    Hettiarachchi, Anuruddha and Wigdor, Daniel , title =. 2016 , isbn =. doi:10.1145/2858036.2858134 , pages =

    2016

  38. [46]

    TriPad: Touch Input in AR on Ordinary Surfaces with Hand Tracking Only , year =

    Dupr\'. TriPad: Touch Input in AR on Ordinary Surfaces with Hand Tracking Only , year =. doi:10.1145/3613904.3642323 , booktitle =

  39. [47]

    2022 , isbn =

    Du, Ruofei and Olwal, Alex and Le Goc, Mathieu and Wu, Shengzhi and Tang, Danhang and Zhang, Yinda and Zhang, Jun and Tan, David Joseph and Tombari, Federico and Kim, David , title =. 2022 , isbn =. doi:10.1145/3491101.3519911 , booktitle =

    2022

  40. [49]

    2024 , isbn =

    Sharma, Adwait and Ivanov, Alexander and Lai, Frances and Grossman, Tovi and Santosa, Stephanie , title =. 2024 , isbn =. doi:10.1145/3643834.3661551 , booktitle =

    2024

  41. [50]

    and Van Wyk, Karl and Iqbal, Umar and Birchfield, Stan and others , booktitle=CVPR, pages=

    Chao, Yu-Wei and Yang, Wei and Xiang, Yu and Molchanov, Pavlo and Handa, Ankur and Tremblay, Jonathan and Narang, Yashraj S. and Van Wyk, Karl and Iqbal, Umar and Birchfield, Stan and others , booktitle=CVPR, pages=

  42. [51]

    Hampali, Shreyas and Rad, Mahdi and Oberweger, Markus and Lepetit, Vincent , booktitle=CVPR, pages=

  43. [52]

    Hand Pose Estimation via Latent

    Iqbal, Umar and Molchanov, Pavlo and Breuel, Thomas and Gall, Juergen and Kautz, Jan , booktitle=. Hand Pose Estimation via Latent

  44. [53]

    End-to-end Hand Mesh Recovery from a Aonocular

    Zhang, Xiong and Li, Qiang and Mo, Hong and Zhang, Wenbo and Zheng, Wen , booktitle=. End-to-end Hand Mesh Recovery from a Aonocular

  45. [54]

    Moon, Gyeongsik and Lee, Kyoung Mu , booktitle=

  46. [55]

    CVPR , pages=

    Monocular Real-time Hand Shape and Motion Capture Using Multi-modal Data , author=. CVPR , pages=

  47. [56]

    ICCV , pages=

    Hand Image Understanding via Deep Multi-task Learning , author=. ICCV , pages=

  48. [57]

    Chen, Xingyu and Liu, Yufeng and Dong, Yajiao and Zhang, Xiong and Ma, Chongyang and Xiong, Yanmin and Zhang, Yuan and Guo, Xiaoyan , booktitle=

  49. [58]

    Xu, Hao and Wang, Tianyu and Tang, Xiao and Fu, Chi-Wing , booktitle=

  50. [59]

    Neural Voting Field for Camera-Space

    Huang, Lin and Lin, Chung-Ching and Lin, Kevin and Liang, Lin and Wang, Lijuan and Yuan, Junsong and Liu, Zicheng , booktitle=. Neural Voting Field for Camera-Space

  51. [60]

    CVPR , pages=

    A Simple Baseline for Efficient Hand Mesh Reconstruction , author=. CVPR , pages=

  52. [61]

    Reconstructing Hands in

    Pavlakos, Georgios and Shan, Dandan and Radosavovic, Ilija and Kanazawa, Angjoo and Fouhey, David and Malik, Jitendra , booktitle=. Reconstructing Hands in

  53. [62]

    Proceedings of the Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Conference (CVPR) , month =

    Potamias, Rolandos Alexandros and Zhang, Jinglei and Deng, Jiankang and Zafeiriou, Stefanos , title =. Proceedings of the Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Conference (CVPR) , month =. 2025 , pages =

    2025

  54. [63]

    Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) , month =

    Dyn-HaMR: Recovering 4D Interacting Hand Motion from a Dynamic Camera , author =. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) , month =

  55. [64]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2512.16727 , year=

    OMG-Bench: A New Challenging Benchmark for Skeleton-based Online Micro Hand Gesture Recognition , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2512.16727 , year=

  56. [65]

    2016 , isbn =

    Chan, Edwin and Seyed, Teddy and Stuerzlinger, Wolfgang and Yang, Xing-Dong and Maurer, Frank , title =. 2016 , isbn =. doi:10.1145/2858036.2858589 , booktitle =

    2016

  57. [66]

    u ller, J \

    Wolf, Katrin and Naumann, Anja and Rohs, Michael and M \"u ller, J \"o rg. A Taxonomy of Microinteractions: Defining Microgestures Based on Ergonomic and Scenario-Dependent Requirements. Human-Computer Interaction -- INTERACT 2011. 2011

    2011

  58. [67]

    2025 , eprint=

    Evaluating the Usability of Microgestures for Text Editing Tasks in Virtual Reality , author=. 2025 , eprint=

    2025

  59. [68]

    Functional Workspace for One-Handed Tap and Swipe Microgestures

    Dewitz, Bastian and Steinicke, Frank and Geiger, Christian. Functional Workspace for One-Handed Tap and Swipe Microgestures. doi:10.18420/muc2019-ws-440

    doi

  60. [69]

    Choi, Changhyun and Trevor, Alexander J. B. and Christensen, Henrik I. , booktitle=. RGB-D edge detection and edge-based registration , year=

  61. [70]

    2025 , eprint=

    Hunyuan3D 2.5: Towards High-Fidelity 3D Assets Generation with Ultimate Details , author=. 2025 , eprint=

    2025

  62. [71]

    2025 , eprint=

    Gemini: A Family of Highly Capable Multimodal Models , author =. 2025 , eprint=

    2025

  63. [72]

    2016 , isbn =

    Wolf, Katrin and Mayer, Sven and Meyer, Stephan , title =. 2016 , isbn =. doi:10.1145/2957265.2961865 , booktitle =

    2016

  64. [73]

    2020 , booktitle=

    NeRF: Representing Scenes as Neural Radiance Fields for View Synthesis , author=. 2020 , booktitle=

    2020

  65. [74]

    3D Gaussian Splatting for Real-Time Radiance Field Rendering , journal =

    Kerbl, Bernhard and Kopanas, Georgios and Leimk. 3D Gaussian Splatting for Real-Time Radiance Field Rendering , journal =. 2023 , url =

    2023

  66. [75]

    Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) , month=

    Geometric Transformer for Fast and Robust Point Cloud Registration , author=. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) , month=. 2022 , pages=

    2022

  67. [76]

    and Cline, Harvey E

    Lorensen, William E. and Cline, Harvey E. , title =. Seminal Graphics: Pioneering Efforts That Shaped the Field, Volume 1 , pages =. 1998 , isbn =

    1998

  68. [77]

    and Cline, Harvey E

    Lorensen, William E. and Cline, Harvey E. , title =. 1987 , isbn =. doi:10.1145/37401.37422 , booktitle =

    1987

  69. [78]

    Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) , month =

    Lin, Zhifeng and Ding, Changxing and Yao, Huan and Kuang, Zengsheng and Huang, Shaoli , title =. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) , month =. 2023 , pages =

    2023

  70. [79]

    Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , pages=

    HOISDF: Constraining 3D Hand-Object Pose Estimation with Global Signed Distance Fields , author=. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , pages=

  71. [80]

    Pavlakos, Georgios and Choutas, Vasileios and Ghorbani, Nima and Bolkart, Timo and Osman, Ahmed A. A. and Tzionas, Dimitrios and Black, Michael J. , booktitle =. Expressive body capture:

  72. [82]

    Yang, Lixin and Zhan, Xinyu and Li, Kailin and Xu, Wenqiang and Li, Jiefeng and Lu, Cewu , booktitle =

  73. [83]

    2023 , issue_date =

    Tang, Xiao and Li, Ruihui and Fu, Chi-Wing , title =. 2023 , issue_date =. doi:10.1145/3569499 , month = jan, articleno =

    2023 doi

  74. [84]

    and Granum, Erik

    Nielsen, Michael and St \"o rring, Moritz and Moeslund, Thomas B. and Granum, Erik. A Procedure for Developing Intuitive and Ergonomic Gesture Interfaces for HCI. Gesture-Based Communication in Human-Computer Interaction. 2004

    2004

  75. [85]

    2023 , note =

    XR Hands package documentation , author =. 2023 , note =

    2023

  76. [86]

    ARKit Documentation , year =

  77. [87]

    and Feiner, Steven , title =

    Henderson, Steven J. and Feiner, Steven , title =. 2008 , isbn =. doi:10.1145/1450579.1450625 , booktitle =

    2008

  78. [89]

    2001 , publisher=

    Passive haptics significantly enhances virtual environments , author=. 2001 , publisher=

    2001

  79. [90]

    and Van Den Hoven, Elise , title =

    Bakker, Saskia and Antle, Alissa N. and Van Den Hoven, Elise , title =. 2012 , issue_date =. doi:10.1007/s00779-011-0410-4 , journal =

    2012 doi

  80. [91]

    2020 , isbn =

    Gupta, Aakar and Lin, Bo Rui and Ji, Siyi and Patel, Arjav and Vogel, Daniel , title =. 2020 , isbn =. doi:10.1145/3313831.3376139 , booktitle =

    2020

  81. [92]

    2006 , isbn =

    Hornecker, Eva and Buur, Jacob , title =. 2006 , isbn =. doi:10.1145/1124772.1124838 , booktitle =

    2006

  82. [93]

    2010 , issue_date =

    Shaer, Orit and Hornecker, Eva , title =. 2010 , issue_date =. doi:10.1561/1100000026 , journal =

    2010 doi

  83. [94]

    2018 , isbn =

    Cheng, Lung-Pan and Chang, Li and Marwecki, Sebastian and Baudisch, Patrick , title =. 2018 , isbn =. doi:10.1145/3173574.3173663 , booktitle =

    2018

  84. [95]

    1997 , isbn =

    Ishii, Hiroshi and Ullmer, Brygg , title =. 1997 , isbn =. doi:10.1145/258549.258715 , booktitle =

    1997

  85. [96]

    2010 , isbn =

    Cheng, Kai-Yin and Liang, Rong-Hao and Chen, Bing-Yu and Laing, Rung-Huei and Kuo, Sy-Yen , title =. 2010 , isbn =. doi:10.1145/1753326.1753499 , booktitle =

    2010

  86. [97]

    Instant user interfaces: repurposing everyday objects as input devices , year =

    Corsten, Christian and Avellino, Ignacio and M\". Instant user interfaces: repurposing everyday objects as input devices , year =. doi:10.1145/2512349.2512799 , booktitle =

  87. [98]

    2014 , isbn =

    Funk, Markus and Korn, Oliver and Schmidt, Albrecht , title =. 2014 , isbn =. doi:10.1145/2559206.2581142 , booktitle =

    2014

  88. [99]

    2019 , issue_date =

    Tian, Yang and Fu, Chi-Wing and Zhao, Shengdong and Li, Ruihui and Tang, Xiao and Hu, Xiaowei and Heng, Pheng-Ann , title =. 2019 , issue_date =. doi:10.1145/3351263 , journal =

    2019 doi

  89. [100]

    2019 , isbn =

    Joshi, Nikhita and Vogel, Daniel , title =. 2019 , isbn =. doi:10.1145/3290605.3300476 , booktitle =

    2019

  90. [101]

    , title =

    Xiao, Robert and Harrison, Chris and Hudson, Scott E. , title =. 2013 , isbn =. doi:10.1145/2470654.2466113 , booktitle =

    2013

  91. [102]

    2023 , isbn =

    Joshi, Nikhita and Abtahi, Parastoo and Sodhi, Raj and Bartov, Nitzan and Rushing, Jackson and Collins, Christopher and Vogel, Daniel and Glueck, Michael , title =. 2023 , isbn =. doi:10.1145/3586183.3606713 , booktitle =

    2023

  92. [103]

    2022 , isbn =

    Rudolph, Julius Cosmo Romeo and Holman, David and De Araujo, Bruno and Jota, Ricardo and Wigdor, Daniel and Savage, Valkyrie , title =. 2022 , isbn =. doi:10.1145/3490149.3501320 , booktitle =

    2022

  93. [104]

    2023 , issue_date =

    Greenslade, Mac and Clark, Adrian and Lukosch, Stephan , title =. 2023 , issue_date =. doi:10.1145/3611052 , journal =

    2023 doi

  94. [105]

    2014 , isbn =

    Niikura, Takehiro and Watanabe, Yoshihiro and Ishikawa, Masatoshi , title =. 2014 , isbn =. doi:10.1145/2582051.2582090 , booktitle =

    2014

  95. [106]

    2017 , issue_date =

    Xiao, Robert and Hudson, Scott and Harrison, Chris , title =. 2017 , issue_date =. doi:10.1145/3095814 , journal =

    2017 doi

  96. [107]

    2023 , issue_date =

    Han, Violet Yinuo and Cho, Hyunsung and Maeda, Kiyosu and Ion, Alexandra and Lindlbauer, David , title =. 2023 , issue_date =. doi:10.1145/3626472 , journal =

    2023 doi

  97. [108]

    and Bergmann Tiest, Wouter M

    Plaisier, Myrthe A. and Bergmann Tiest, Wouter M. and Kappers, Astrid M. L. , title =. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics , year =. doi:10.3758/APP.71.2.421 , url =

    doi

  98. [109]

    2011 , isbn =

    Rublee, Ethan and Rabaud, Vincent and Konolige, Kurt and Bradski, Gary , title =. 2011 , isbn =. doi:10.1109/ICCV.2011.6126544 , booktitle =

    2011

  99. [110]

    , title =

    Romero, Javier and Tzionas, Dimitrios and Black, Michael J. , title =. 2017 , issue_date =. doi:10.1145/3130800.3130883 , journal =

    2017

  100. [111]

    Alec Jacobson and Daniele Panozzo and others , note =

  101. [112]

    A density-based algorithm for discovering clusters in large spatial databases with noise , year =

    Ester, Martin and Kriegel, Hans-Peter and Sander, J\". A density-based algorithm for discovering clusters in large spatial databases with noise , year =. Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining , pages =

  102. [113]

    1986 , issue_date =

    Canny, J , title =. 1986 , issue_date =. doi:10.1109/TPAMI.1986.4767851 , journal =

    1986

  103. [114]

    Alvey Vision Conference , year=

    A Combined Corner and Edge Detector , author=. Alvey Vision Conference , year=

  104. [115]

    and McKay, Neil D

    Besl, Paul J. and McKay, Neil D. , title =. 1992 , issue_date =. doi:10.1109/34.121791 , journal =

    1992 doi

  105. [116]

    and Thomas, Bruce H

    Cordeil, Maxime and Bach, Benjamin and Cunningham, Andrew and Montoya, Bastian and Smith, Ross T. and Thomas, Bruce H. and Dwyer, Tim , title =. 2020 , isbn =. doi:10.1145/3313831.3376613 , booktitle =

    2020

  106. [117]

    2012 , isbn =

    Jansen, Yvonne and Dragicevic, Pierre and Fekete, Jean-Daniel , title =. 2012 , isbn =. doi:10.1145/2207676.2208691 , pages =

    2012

  107. [118]

    and Tanner, Kesler and Ishii, Hiroshi and Follmer, Sean , title =

    Jang, Sungjune and Kim, Lawrence H. and Tanner, Kesler and Ishii, Hiroshi and Follmer, Sean , title =. Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems , pages =. 2016 , isbn =

    2016

  108. [119]

    and Colaço, Andrea and Hoffmann, Henry and Gonzalez-Franco, Mar and Ahuja, Karan , journal=

    Xu, Vasco and Chen, Brian and Gonzalez, Eric J. and Colaço, Andrea and Hoffmann, Henry and Gonzalez-Franco, Mar and Ahuja, Karan , journal=. SurfaceXR: Fusing Smartwatch IMUs and Egocentric Hand Pose for Seamless Surface Interactions , year=

  109. [120]

    2025 , isbn =

    Fan, Xu and Huang, Xincheng and Xiao, Robert , title =. 2025 , isbn =. doi:10.1145/3756884.3766028 , booktitle =

    2025

  110. [121]

    2026 , howpublished =

    2026

  111. [122]

    European Conference on Computer Vision , pages=

    Pcf-lift: Panoptic lifting by probabilistic contrastive fusion , author=. European Conference on Computer Vision , pages=. 2024 , organization=

    2024

  112. [123]

    Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , pages=

    Rethinking end-to-end 2d to 3d scene segmentation in gaussian splatting , author=. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , pages=

  113. [124]

    Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , volume=

    Cos3d: Collaborative open-vocabulary 3d segmentation , author=. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , volume=

  114. [125]

    EPS3D: End-to-End Feed-Forward 3D Panoptic Segmentation , author=

  115. [126]

    Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF international conference on computer vision , pages=

    AdaFit: Rethinking learning-based normal estimation on point clouds , author=. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF international conference on computer vision , pages=

  116. [127]

    Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision , pages=

    Ssp: Semi-signed prioritized neural fitting for surface reconstruction from unoriented point clouds , author=. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision , pages=

  117. [128]

    Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) , month =

    Xu, Hao and Wang, Tianyu and Tang, Xiao and Fu, Chi-Wing , title =. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) , month =. 2023 , pages =

    2023

  118. [129]

    2024 , isbn =

    Wang, Yinqiao and Xu, Hao and Heng, Pheng-Ann and Fu, Chi-Wing , title =. 2024 , isbn =. doi:10.1609/aaai.v38i6.28382 , booktitle =

    2024 doi

  119. [130]

    Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) , month =

    Xu, Hao and Li, Haipeng and Wang, Yinqiao and Liu, Shuaicheng and Fu, Chi-Wing , title =. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) , month =. 2024 , pages =

    2024

  120. [131]

    2025 , doi=

    Xu, Hao and Li, Haipeng and Wang, Yinqiao and Liu, Shuaicheng and Fu, Chi-Wing , journal=. 2025 , doi=

    2025

  121. [132]

    and Liu, Shuaicheng and Heng, Pheng-Ann and Fu, Chi-Wing , year=

    Xu, Hao and Wang, Yinqiao and Mitra, Niloy J. and Liu, Shuaicheng and Heng, Pheng-Ann and Fu, Chi-Wing , year=. Hand-Shadow Poser , volume=. ACM Transactions on Graphics , publisher=. doi:10.1145/3730836 , number=

    doi

  122. [133]

    Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) , month =

    Wang, Yinqiao and Xu, Hao and Heng, Pheng-Ann and Fu, Chi-Wing , title =. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) , month =. 2025 , pages =

    2025

  123. [134]

    2601.19850 , archivePrefix=

    Xie, Binzhu and Qiu, Shi and Zhang, Sicheng and Wang, Yinqiao and Xu, Hao and Naseer, Muzammal and Fu, Chi-Wing and Heng, Pheng-Ann , year=. 2601.19850 , archivePrefix=

  124. [135]

    Xu, Hao and Liu, Yilin and Wang, Yinqiao and Fu, Chi-Wing and Mitra, Niloy J. , year=. 2605.20992 , archivePrefix=

    arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 16, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.