pith. sign in

arxiv: 1312.0287 · v3 · pith:2MUXDSBKnew · submitted 2013-12-01 · 🧮 math.PR

Point-Map-Probabilities of a Point Process and Mecke's Invariant Measure Equation

classification 🧮 math.PR
keywords point-mapprobabilitypointinvariantpalmprobabilitiesprocessbijective
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

A compatible point-shift $F$ maps, in a translation invariant way, each point of a stationary point process $\Phi$ to some point of $\Phi$. It is fully determined by its associated point-map, $f$, which gives the image of the origin by $F$. It was proved by J. Mecke that if $F$ is bijective, then the Palm probability of $\Phi$ is left invariant by the translation of $-f$. The initial question motivating this paper is the following generalization of this invariance result: in the non-bijective case, what probability measures on the set of counting measures are left invariant by the translation of $-f$? The point-map probabilities of $\Phi$ are defined from the action of the semigroup of point-map translations on the space of Palm probabilities, and more precisely from the compactification of the orbits of this semigroup action. If the point-map probability exists, is uniquely defined, and if it satisfies certain continuity properties, it then provides a solution to this invariant measure problem. Point-map probabilities are objects of independent interest. They are shown to be a strict generalization of Palm probabilities: when $F$ is bijective, the point-map probability of $\Phi$ boils down to the Palm probability of $\Phi$. When it is not bijective, there exist cases where the point-map probability of $\Phi$ is singular with respect to its Palm probability. A tightness based criterion for the existence of the point-map probabilities of a stationary point process is given. An interpretation of the point-map probability as the conditional law of the point process given that the origin has $F$-pre-images of all orders is also provided. The results are illustrated by a few examples.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.