Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 4 minor 1 cited by

Mathematics of effective $q$-plate in polarization optics

T0 review · 2 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-04 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Three q-plates can be stacked so that the combination behaves as a single, continuously tunable waveplate, with effective retardance adjustable from 0 to 2π by rotating the relative offset angle.

desk verdict A mostly clean Jones-matrix catalog of three-q-plate effective waveplates, with a couple of presentation errors and one inflated coverage claim; the core result is real and worth refereeing. read the letter →

arxiv 2509.08398 v1 pith:2MWBMWDE submitted 2025-09-10 physics.optics

Mohammad Umar , Paramasivam Senthilkumaran This is my paper
classification physics.optics PACS 42.25.Ja
keywords q-plateeffectivewaveplateJonescalculushigher-orderPoincarésphereholonomictransformationtunableretardanceopticalvorticestopologicalindexspace
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper shows that three coaxially stacked q-plates—spatially patterned birefringent plates whose fast axis rotates around the beam—can be made to act like a single effective waveplate, provided a derived constraint makes the real part of the off-diagonal Jones matrix element vanish. In the cases built from two quarter-wave q-plates and one half-wave q-plate, the effective retardance depends only on the relative offset angle between the plates and can be tuned continuously from 0 to 2π, while the effective fast axis keeps the standard qφ+α0 form. This means one fixed triple of plates gives a continuously adjustable waveplate, and on the higher-order Poincaré sphere it corresponds to a complete 2π holonomic rotation. The authors work out all eight combinations of quarter-wave and half-wave q-plates and tabulate which produce constant retardance (π/2 or π) and which are tunable.

What carries the argument

The central object is the Jones product M(δ3,α3)M(δ2,α2)M(δ1,α1) of three q-plates, where each plate's fast axis is α(φ)=qφ+α0 and δ is π/2 or π. A sequence of waveplates acts as a single effective waveplate only when the real part C_q of the off-diagonal element of the total matrix vanishes; setting C_q=0 is the constraint that makes the product take the symmetric SU(2) form of a single waveplate. The effective retardance and fast-axis orientation are then extracted from the trace and off-diagonal phase of the product, giving Table I and the tunable formula δe=2(π−2Δα).

What would settle it

Measure the full Jones matrix (or Stokes response) of a fabricated q_Q q_H q_Q stack with identical q for the three plates as a function of Δα, for example with polarization-sensitive imaging or interferometric Jones tomography; if the real off-diagonal element C_q is nonzero, or the inferred retardance deviates from δe=2(π−2Δα) by more than the retardance tolerance of the plates, the exact effective-waveplate claim fails. Since C_q=0 requires exact fast-axis matching α1=α3, misalignment between the outer plates is a direct falsifier.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that a coaxially stacked triple of q-plates—each a spatially inhomogeneous SU(2) waveplate whose fast-axis orientation is α(φ)=qφ+α0—can be optically equivalent to a single effective q-plate whenever the real part C_q of the off-diagonal element of the total Jones matrix vanishes. The authors derive the C_q=0 conditions for all eight combinations of quarter-wave (q_Q) and half-wave (q_H) plates and give the resulting effective retardance δe and fast-axis orientation αe in Table I. For the two-Q-one-H arrangements (q_Q q_H q_Q, q_Q q_Q q_H, q_H q_Q q_Q) with equal topological charges, δe = 2(π−2Δα), where Δα is the relative offset angle between the quarter- and ha

Load-bearing premise

The derivation assumes every q-plate is an ideal, lossless SU(2) element whose fast axis is exactly α(φ)=qφ+α0 and whose retardance is exactly π/2 or π, and that the C_q=0 alignment conditions hold exactly; real fabricated q-plates have retardance errors, dispersion, and aperture nonuniformities that will break the exact equivalence.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • A q_Q q_H q_Q stack (and its two Q/H permutations) with equal topological charge q acts as a single q-plate of charge q whose retardance is set continuously by the relative offset angle Δα=α_Q−α_H, from 0 to 2π, with effective fast axis α_Q−π/4.
  • These tunable configurations therefore execute a complete 2π rotation—a full SU(2) walk—on the higher-order Poincaré sphere of order q, with the rotation axis set by the effective offset angle.
  • Configurations with constant effective retardance (e.g., q_H q_H q_Q with aligned plates) act as equivalent single quarter-wave or half-wave q-plates, reproducing the function of a physical q-plate from three stacked ones.
  • The q_H q_H q_H configuration, which works for arbitrary q values, synthesizes an effective q-plate whose topological charge is q1−q2+q3; inserting a homogeneous HWP gives charge addition q1+q3 or subtraction q1−q2 depending on which outer plate is homogeneous.
  • Setting q=0 reduces the three-q-plate analysis to the known minimal three-waveplate SU(2) gadget, so the homogeneous universal polarization gadget is a special case of this formalism.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The derivation is exact and no tolerance budget is given; a practical test would be Jones-matrix tomography of a real stack, checking whether C_q stays zero as Δα is scanned and whether the measured retardance follows 2(π−2Δα) within fabrication error.
  • Because the control parameter is a rotation angle, the stack is a candidate variable retarder with no moving optical path length—one could motorize or electrically rotate the middle plate to time-vary the retardance and hence the polarization topology on the HOPS.
  • For unequal q, the effective element lives in a mixed index space, so the formalism hints at a design rule for synthesizing q-plates with exotic effective charges (e.g., q1+q3 or q1−q2) whose offset is tuned by the orientation of an ordinary half-wave plate.
  • A natural next step, not pursued here, is to search for minimal cascades of q-plates—analogous to the four- and three-waveplate SU(2) gadgets for homogeneous plates—that perform arbitrary, not just 2π, rotations on the HOPS; the tunable two-Q-one-H stack is the first building block.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper develops a Jones-calculus formalism for cascades of three q-plates, each being either a quarter-wave or half-wave plate, and derives conditions under which the three-plate product reduces to a single effective waveplate. Table I lists eight configurations and gives the required C_q=0 conditions together with the effective retardance and fast-axis orientation. The central tunable examples are the two-Q-one-H arrangements, for which the effective retardance can be swept over 0 to 2π by varying the relative offset angles, with the effective fast axis taking the form qφ+const. The paper then interprets this tunability as enabling holonomic rotations on the higher-order Poincaré sphere. The derivation is purely symbolic and assumes ideal lossless q-plates with exact π/2 or π retardance.

Significance. If the Table I identities are correct, the paper provides a useful design tool for structured-light optics: three inhomogeneous waveplates can emulate a single q-plate with either fixed or tunable retardance, and the tunable cases extend the classical three-waveplate SU(2) gadget to higher-order Poincaré spheres. The manuscript is explicit and standard in its Jones-matrix approach, and the central product identities are of the type that can be verified by direct symbolic multiplication; no parameters are fitted and no data are used. Its main limitations are that all claims are conditional on ideal devices (no tolerance analysis or experimental validation) and, as discussed below, some interpretive statements in the geometric Sections II and III outrun what the algebraic calculation actually establishes.

major comments (2)
  1. [Section II B, Eq. (9)] The claim that k=(cos2α,sin2α,0) makes Eq. (9) reproduce Eq. (4) is not correct with the Pauli matrices in Eq. (10). For this k, k·σ = [[0,e^{-i2α}],[e^{i2α},0]], so Eq. (9) gives off-diagonal elements i sin(δ/2)e^{-i2α}, whereas Eq. (4) has i sin(δ/2) sin2α. In the stated basis the correct vector for Eq. (4) is k=(sin2α,0,cos2α). Since Section II D uses the equatorial-axis picture to justify the SO(3)/HOPS rotation interpretation, this error needs to be corrected or the Pauli basis must be specified differently.
  2. [Section III C (after Eq. (30)) and Conclusion] The paper concludes that the tunable configurations show 'the feasibility of achieving complete SU(2) coverage on the HOPS.' What is demonstrated is an effective waveplate that produces rotations about an equatorial axis, with the rotation angle tunable through the relative offset angle and the azimuth of the axis tunable through α_Q. Rotations about axes constrained to a single plane do not generate arbitrary SU(2)/SO(3) elements. Unless an additional construction is supplied, the conclusion should be narrowed to 'holonomic rotations through an arbitrary angle about equatorial axes' or phrased as a full 2π holonomy walk, not as complete SU(2) coverage.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Section III C, Eq. (24)] The term 'cos 2[δ1(ϕ)−δ3(ϕ)]' is dimensionally inconsistent and should read 'cos 2[α1(ϕ)−α3(ϕ)]'. Also, the sentence before Table I refers to 'σ_q' where the rest of the text uses 'C_q'.
  2. [Section III B, Eq. (21)] The condition α1(ϕ)−α2(ϕ)=mπ/2 can hold for all ϕ only if q1=q2. This should be stated explicitly in the two-plate discussion, since otherwise the condition appears to allow arbitrary topological charges.
  3. [Section II B, Eq. (7)] The extraction formula for α uses a two-argument arctangent implicitly; as written, tan^{-1}(Im M12/Im M11) is branch-ambiguous. The branch convention matters in Table I, where expressions such as −1/2 tan^{-1}[cot 2α] are used; the authors should specify the four-quadrant convention and the modulo-π periodicity of α.
  4. [General] There are several typos, e.g., 'retradnce' in the Introduction, 'condtion' in the Table I caption, and 'the the' in Section II D. These do not affect the mathematics but should be corrected in a final revision.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No significant circularity; the effective-waveplate identities are derived by direct Jones-matrix algebra, and the self-citations are interpretive.

full rationale

The load-bearing result is the product identity M(δ3,α3)M(δ2,α2)M(δ1,α1)=M(δe,αe) under the Table I constraints. The paper obtains A_q, B_q, C_q, D_q in Eqs. (24)-(27) by multiplying the standard Jones matrices of Eq. (4); it then imposes C_q=0 as a definition of effective-waveplate behavior and extracts δe and αe from trace/off-diagonal Eqs. (6)-(7). No parameter is fitted to data, no experimental subset is predicted, and the tunable-retardance formulas such as Eq. (29) are direct trigonometric simplifications of the same product. The only self-citations [13,14] enter when interpreting the effective retardance as an SO(3) rotation on the HOPS and when invoking the holonomy condition; these citations are not used to derive the Jones identities and do not constrain the product algebra. There are presentation/correctness defects (e.g., the Eq. (9) Pauli parameterization is inconsistent with Eq. (4), and Eq. (26) does not appear to reproduce direct multiplication for three HWPs), but these are algebraic or notational issues rather than circular reductions.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No numbers are fitted to data or chosen ad hoc. The offset angles and charges q_i are design variables, not fitted parameters. No new particles, fields, or entities are posited; the effective q-plate is a derived description of an existing device stack.

assumptions (5)
  • standard math Jones matrix of a waveplate is SU(2) symmetric of the form Eq. (4) with off-diagonal equal and purely imaginary.
    Used throughout Section III to build products; standard Jones calculus.
  • domain assumption q-plate fast axis orientation is α(φ)=qφ+α0 (Eq. 11).
    This is the defining model of the q-plate, stated in Section II C.
  • domain assumption A sequence of waveplates is an effective waveplate only if the real off-diagonal component C vanishes, reducing the product to the waveplate form Eq. (8).
    Definition introduced in Section III A; it is the constraint that makes the product equivalent to a single retarder.
  • domain assumption The action of a q-plate of charge q on a HOPS of order η is a global SO(3) rotation only when η=q (holonomy condition, Eq. 12).
    Taken from the authors' prior works [13,14]; used to interpret the tunable retardance as rotation on the HOPS.
  • standard math SU(2) to SO(3) double-cover geometry of the Poincaré sphere (Section II A/B).
    Background used for interpretation; not load-bearing for the matrix algebra.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Mathematics of effective $q$-plate in polarization optics." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/2MWBMWDE

@misc{pith2026250908398,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Mathematics of effective $q$-plate in polarization optics},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/2MWBMWDE}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2509.08398}
}
abstract

The $q$-plate is a spatially inhomogeneous SU(2) birefringent optical element that has garnered significant interest due to its ability to mediate the spin-orbit interaction of light and facilitate the generation of optical vortices. The $q$-plate features a spatially varying fast axis orientation defined by two parameters: the topological charge $q$ and the offset angle $\alpha_0$. The notion of an effective waveplate arises when multiple waveplates, whether homogeneous or inhomogeneous, are aligned coaxially such that, under specific constraints, the composite system emulates the behavior of a single effective waveplate. This work presents a comprehensive mathematical formalism for realizing an effective waveplate through a cascaded configuration of three $q$-plates, each chosen as either a quarter-wave $q$-plate, a half-wave $q$-plate, or a combination thereof. This yields a total of eight distinct configurations. Some configurations result in an effective waveplate exhibiting a constant retardance, whereas others allow continuous modulation of the effective retardance over the full range from $0$ to $2\pi$ through the systematic variation of the relative offset angles between the constituent $q$-plates. This feature enables holonomic polarization transformations on the higher-order Poincar\'e sphere, making the concept of the effective waveplate applicable to topological index spaces. Moreover, tunable effective retardance holds significant potential for applications involving structured light corresponding to the higher-order Poincar\'{e} sphere, particularly in scenarios demanding controlled spatial modulation of polarization states or dynamic tailoring of polarization topologies.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2509.08398 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. (Color online). The geometry of the standard PS ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. (Color online). Geometry of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. (Color online). Depiction of the SOP evolution [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. (Color online). The variation of the effective retar [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_4.png]

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. SU(2) gadget for higher-order Poincar\'{e} sphere

    physics.optics 2025-09 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Two quarter-wave q-plates plus one half-wave q-plate, in any order, form a universal SU(2) gadget for arbitrary polarization transformations on the higher-order Poincaré sphere.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

49 extracted references · 47 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    Hecht,Optics(Pearson Education India, 2012)

    E. Hecht,Optics(Pearson Education India, 2012)

    work page 2012

  2. [2]

    Goldstein and D

    D. Goldstein and D. H. Goldstein,Polarized Light, Re- vised and Expanded, Vol. 83 (CRC Press, 2003)

    work page 2003

  3. [3]

    Furthermore, if we consider twoq Q-plates with m=±1, thenδ e = 0, and the effect of this configuration is null

    The key condition is that the fast axis orientations of bothq-plates must be the same, which ensures that C q = 0. Furthermore, if we consider twoq Q-plates with m=±1, thenδ e = 0, and the effect of this configuration is null. However, this null effect applies only to beams within the same topological index space and light beams from a different index spa...

    work page 2022

  4. [4]

    Collett,Polarized Light in Fiber Optics(SPIE Press, 2003)

    E. Collett,Polarized Light in Fiber Optics(SPIE Press, 2003)

    work page 2003

  5. [5]

    Marrucci, C

    L. Marrucci, C. Manzo, and D. Paparo, Optical spin-to- orbital angular momentum conversion in inhomogeneous anisotropic media, Physical Review Letters96, 163905 (2006)

    work page 2006

  6. [6]

    Marrucci, Theq-plate and its future, Journal of Nanophotonics7, 078598 (2013)

    L. Marrucci, Theq-plate and its future, Journal of Nanophotonics7, 078598 (2013)

    work page 2013

  7. [7]

    Rubano, F

    A. Rubano, F. Cardano, B. Piccirillo, and L. Marrucci, Q-plate technology: a progress review, Journal of the Optical Society of America B36, D70 (2019)

    work page 2019

  8. [8]

    Delaney, M

    S. Delaney, M. M. S´ anchez-L´ opez, I. Moreno, and J. A. Davis, Arithmetic withq-plates, Applied Optics56, 596 (2017)

    work page 2017

Show all 49 references
  1. [9]

    Machavariani, Y

    G. Machavariani, Y. Lumer, I. Moshe, A. Meir, and S. Jackel, Spatially-variable retardation plate for efficient generation of radially- and azimuthally-polarized beams, Optics Communications281, 732 (2008)

    2008

  2. [10]

    Kadiri and G

    G. Kadiri and G. Raghavan, Wavelength-adaptable effec- tiveq-plates with passively tunable retardance, Scientific Reports9, 11911 (2019)

    2019

  3. [11]

    Bansal, S

    S. Bansal, S. K. Pal, and P. Senthilkumaran, Use ofq- plate as a coupler, Applied Optics59, 4933 (2020)

    2020

  4. [12]

    Cardano, E

    F. Cardano, E. Karimi, S. Slussarenko, L. Marrucci, C. de Lisio, and E. Santamato, Polarization pattern of vector vortex beams generated byq-plates with different topological charges, Applied Optics51, C1 (2012)

    2012

  5. [13]

    Slussarenko, A

    S. Slussarenko, A. Murauski, T. Du, V. Chigrinov, L. Marrucci, and E. Santamato, Tunable liquid crystalq- plates with arbitrary topological charge, Optics Express 19, 4085 (2011)

    2011

  6. [14]

    Umar and P

    M. Umar and P. Senthilkumaran, Holonomically con- strained polarization transformation, Physics Letters A , 130909 (2025)

    2025

  7. [15]

    Umar and P

    M. Umar and P. Senthilkumaran,SU(2) polarization evo- lution on higher-order Poincar´ e sphere by using general q-plate, arXiv:2506.20286 (2025)

    2025 arXiv

  8. [16]

    Simon, N

    R. Simon, N. Mukunda, and E. Sudarshan, Hamilton’s theory of turns and a new geometrical representation for polarization optics, Pramana32, 769 (1989)

    1989

  9. [17]

    Simon and N

    R. Simon and N. Mukunda, UniversalSU(2) gadget for polarization optics, Physics Letters A138, 474 (1989)

    1989

  10. [18]

    Simon and N

    R. Simon and N. Mukunda, Minimal three-component SU(2) gadget for polarization optics, Physics Letters A 143, 165 (1990)

    1990

  11. [19]

    S. G. Reddy, S. Prabhakar, C. Perumangattu, R. P. Singh, and R. Simon, A polarization gadget with two quarter wave plates: Application to Mueller polarimetry, arXiv:1412.7805 (2014)

    2014 arXiv

  12. [20]

    Bansal and P

    S. Bansal and P. Senthilkumaran, Gadget to realize ar- bitrary polarization transformation on a higher order Poincar´ e sphere, arXiv:2508.19871 (2025)

    2025 arXiv

  13. [21]

    Senthilkumaran, and S

    Ruchi, P. Senthilkumaran, and S. K. Pal, Phase singular- ities to polarization singularities, International Journal of Optics2020, 2812803 (2020)

    2020

  14. [22]

    Senthilkumaran,Singularities in Physics and Engi- neering(IOP Publishing, 2024)

    P. Senthilkumaran,Singularities in Physics and Engi- neering(IOP Publishing, 2024)

    2024

  15. [23]

    S. K. Pal, Ruchi, and P. Senthilkumaran, Polarization singularity index sign inversion by a half-wave plate, Ap- plied Optics56, 6181 (2017)

    2017

  16. [24]

    A. M. Yao and M. J. Padgett, Orbital angular momen- tum: origins, behavior and applications, Advances in Op- tics and Photonics3, 161 (2011)

    2011

  17. [25]

    W. Shu, X. Ling, X. Fu, Y. Liu, Y. Ke, and H. Luo, Polarization evolution of vector beams generated byq- plates, Photonics Research5, 64 (2017)

    2017

  18. [26]

    J. Yao, X. Jiang, J. Zhang, A. Wang, and Q. Zhan, Quan- titative detection of high-order Poincar´ e sphere beams and their polarization evolution, Optics Express31, 3017 (2023)

    2023

  19. [27]

    Gregg, M

    P. Gregg, M. Mirhosseini, A. Rubano, L. Marrucci, E. Karimi, R. Boyd, and S. Ramachandran,q-plates as 11 higher order polarization controllers for orbital angu- lar momentum modes of fiber, Optics Letters40, 1729 (2015)

    2015

  20. [28]

    Ji, C.-H

    W. Ji, C.-H. Lee, P. Chen, W. Hu, Y. Ming, L. Zhang, T.-H. Lin, V. Chigrinov, and Y.-Q. Lu, Meta-q-plate for complex beam shaping, Scientific Reports6, 25528 (2016)

    2016

  21. [29]

    Hakobyan and E

    V. Hakobyan and E. Brasselet, Q-plates: From optical vortices to optical skyrmions, Physical Review Letters 134, 083802 (2025)

    2025

  22. [30]

    Poincar´ e,Th´ eorie math´ ematique de la lumi´ ere (Gauthier-Villars, Paris 1892) Vol

    H. Poincar´ e,Th´ eorie math´ ematique de la lumi´ ere (Gauthier-Villars, Paris 1892) Vol. 2(See also H.G. Jer- rard: J. Opt. Soc. Am, 1954)

    1954

  23. [31]

    Milione, H

    G. Milione, H. I. Sztul, D. A. Nolan, and R. R. Alfano, Higher-order Poincar´ e sphere, Stokes parameters, and the angular momentum of light, Physical Review Letters 107, 053601 (2011)

    2011

  24. [32]

    Pancharatnam, Generalized theory of interference, and its applications: Part i

    S. Pancharatnam, Generalized theory of interference, and its applications: Part i. coherent pencils, Proceedings of the Indian Academy of Sciences – Section A44, 247 (1956)

    1956

  25. [33]

    Bansal and P

    S. Bansal and P. Senthilkumaran, Stokes polarimetry with Poincar´ e–hopf index beams, Optics and Lasers in Engineering160, 107295 (2023)

    2023

  26. [34]

    Naidoo, F

    D. Naidoo, F. S. Roux, A. Dudley, I. Litvin, B. Piccir- illo, L. Marrucci, and A. Forbes, Controlled generation of higher-order Poincar´ e sphere beams from a laser, Nature Photonics10, 327 (2016)

    2016

  27. [35]

    S. Chen, X. Zhou, Y. Liu, X. Ling, H. Luo, and S. Wen, Generation of arbitrary cylindrical vector beams on the higher order Poincar´ e sphere, Optics Letters39, 5274 (2014)

    2014

  28. [36]

    K. Ji, D. Lin, I. A. Davidson, S. Wang, J. Carpenter, Y. Amma, Y. Jung, M. Guasoni, and D. J. Richardson, Controlled generation of picosecond-pulsed higher-order Poincar´ e sphere beams from an ytterbium-doped multi- core fiber amplifier, Photonics Research11, 181 (2023)

    2023

  29. [37]

    Y. Liu, C. Zhou, K. Yu, Y. Liu, G. Wang, B. Yan, and H. Liu, Generation of arbitrary vector orbital angu- lar momentum beams on higher-order Poincar´ e spheres based on an all-dielectric metasurface with complex am- plitude modulation, Optics Express32, 33494 (2024)

    2024

  30. [38]

    J. Yao, X. Jiang, J. Zhang, and A. Wang, Generation and detection of high-order Poincar´ e sphere beams, inSev- enteenth National Conference on Laser Technology and Optoelectronics, Vol. 12501 (SPIE, 2022) pp. 108–112

    2022

  31. [39]

    Y. Liu, X. Ling, X. Yi, X. Zhou, H. Luo, and S. Wen, Realization of polarization evolution on higher-order Poincar´ e sphere with metasurface, Applied Physics Let- ters104, 191110 (2014)

    2014

  32. [40]

    W. Xu, S. Chen, S. Wen, and H. Luo, Polarization evo- lution on the higher-order Poincar´ e sphere via photonic Dirac points, Physical Review A104, 013504 (2021)

    2021

  33. [41]

    H. Yang, Z. Xie, G. Li, K. Ou, F. Yu, H. He, H. Wang, and X. Yuan, All-dielectric metasurface for fully resolv- ing arbitrary beams on a higher-order Poincar´ e sphere, Photonics Research9, 331 (2021)

    2021

  34. [42]

    Fickler, L

    R. Fickler, L. Kopf, and M. Ornigotti, Higher-order Poincar´ e spheres and spatiospectral Poincar´ e beams, Physical Review Research6, 033298 (2024)

    2024

  35. [43]

    Bougouffa and M

    S. Bougouffa and M. Babiker, Optical forces on atoms subject to higher-order Poincar´ e vortex modes, Physical Review A111, 013520 (2025)

    2025

  36. [44]

    S. K. Pal and L. A. Rusch, Tight focusing of radially- azimuthally polarized higher order poincar´ e sphere beams, in2024 Conference on Lasers and Electro-Optics (CLEO)(Optica Publishing Group, 2024)

    2024

  37. [45]

    H. Yang, K. Ou, Q. Liu, M. Peng, Z. Xie, Y. Jiang, H. Jia, X. Cheng, H. Jing, Y. Hu,et al., Metasurface higher- order Poincar´ e sphere polarization detection clock, Light: Science & Applications14, 63 (2025)

    2025

  38. [46]

    Bettegowda, Prescription for transforming polariza- tion states of light using two-quarter waveplates, Optical Engineering56, 034110 (2017)

    R. Bettegowda, Prescription for transforming polariza- tion states of light using two-quarter waveplates, Optical Engineering56, 034110 (2017)

    2017

  39. [47]

    J. N. Damask,Polarization Optics in Telecommunica- tions, Vol. 101 (Springer Science & Business Media, 2004)

    2004

  40. [48]

    Kumar and A

    A. Kumar and A. Ghatak,Polarization of Light with Ap- plications in Optical Fibers(SPIE Press, 2011)

    2011

  41. [49]

    G. G. Stokes, On the composition and resolution of streams of polarized light from different sources, Trans- actions of the Cambridge Philosophical Society9, 399 (1851)

Pith tools

Reviewed August 4, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.