Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 minor 48 references

Uniform rectifiability and elliptic operators satisfying a Carleson measure condition. Part II: The large constant case

T0 review · 0 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper proves that for divergence-form elliptic operators with coefficients satisfying the DKP Carleson condition, quantitative absolute continuity of elliptic measure forces the boundary to be uniformly rectifiable and the domain to…

desk verdict Settles the large-constant DKP/free-boundary equivalence, and the main line holds up; the proof has a fixable gap in Lemma 5.9 where P is claimed to lie inside the sawtooth domain. read the letter →

arxiv 1908.03161 v2 pith:2ODIHZA2 submitted 2019-08-08 math.AP math.CA

Steve Hofmann , José María Martell , Svitlana Mayboroda , Tatiana Toro , Zihui Zhao This is my paper · ORCID
classification math.APmath.CA MSC 35J2542B3731B35
keywords ellipticmeasureuniformrectifiabilitychord-arcdomainDahlberg-Kenig-PipherconditionCarlesonA∞weightsextrapolationsawtoothdomains
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper closes a circle of equivalences: in a uniform domain with Ahlfors regular boundary, if a divergence-form elliptic operator with coefficients satisfying the DKP condition has elliptic measure in A∞ with respect to surface measure, then the boundary is uniformly rectifiable and the domain is chord-arc. The reverse implication was already known; the new contribution is the forward direction in the large-constant case, where the Carleson norm of the coefficient gradient is merely finite rather than sufficiently small. A reader should care because this is a quantitative free-boundary statement: analytic regularity of the Dirichlet problem, measured by A∞ weights, is exactly equivalent to concrete geometric regularity of the boundary. The proof works by extrapolating a previously established small-constant theorem and by transferring the A∞ property from the original domain to arbitrary sawtooth subdomains with uniform constants.

What carries the argument

Two objects carry the argument. The first is a self-improvement theorem for discrete Carleson measures (Theorem 3.1): if a measure m with small Carleson norm controls a second measure m̃ on every sawtooth region where m is small, then m̃ is globally Carleson. The second is the family of sawtooth subdomains Ω_{F,Q} built from dyadic cubes on the boundary and fattened Whitney boxes; the main technical step, Theorem 5.1, transfers ω_L∈A∞(σ) from Ω to every such sawtooth with constants independent of the stopping family F and cube Q, by comparing Green functions in fundamental chord-arc subdomains and using reverse Hölder estimates for the kernel. The small discrete Carleson hypothesis is converted into a small continuous Carleson bound in the sawtooth domain (Section 4), which allows the small-constant theorem to be applied; monotone convergence then passes from compactly contained sawtooths to general ones.

What would settle it

Search for a uniform domain Ω⊂R^n with Ahlfors regular boundary and a uniformly elliptic matrix A satisfying (H1)–(H2) whose elliptic measure is in A∞(σ) but whose boundary is not uniformly rectifiable, for instance containing a set of positive surface measure with no tangent plane; the theorem asserts no such pair exists, so finding one, or even a single scale where the discrete sawtooth estimate (3.5) fails for a bounded harmonic function, would refute the central claim.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central result (Theorem 1.6) states that for a uniform domain Ω⊂R^n, n≥3, with Ahlfors regular boundary, and a uniformly elliptic matrix A satisfying (H1) and (H2) — Lipschitz coefficients with |∇A|δ(·) bounded and |∇A|²δ(·) a Carleson measure with finite norm — the following are equivalent: elliptic measure ω_L for L=-div(A∇) belongs to A∞(σ), the boundary ∂Ω is uniformly rectifiable, and Ω is a chord-arc domain. The new load-bearing implication is that A∞ forces uniform rectifiability. The proof reduces to symmetric matrices, then uses a discrete Carleson extrapolation theorem with two discrete measures built from |∇A|²δ and from |∇u|²δ for bounded harmonic functions u; under a small discrete Carleson hypothesis on sawtooth subdomains, the previous small-constant theorem makes those sawtooths chord-arc, and an extrapolation step upgrades the resulting estimates to the whole domain.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the A∞ property of elliptic measure transfers from Ω to every sawtooth subdomain Ω*_{F,Q} with uniform constants; if the Green-function comparison behind that transfer fails below scale τℓ(I_i)/8, the small-constant hypothesis cannot be applied on the sawtooth and the extrapolation collapses.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • For DKP operators, the three notions — A∞ elliptic measure, uniform rectifiability of the boundary, and chord-arc geometry — stand or fall together in uniform domains with Ahlfors regular boundary.
  • Since ω_L∈A∞ is equivalent to L^p solvability of the Dirichlet problem, the result gives a geometric characterization of L^p solvability, a quantitative analogue of the Wiener criterion adapted to singular L^p data.
  • Corollary 6.3 replaces the pointwise gradient hypotheses (H1)–(H2) by a Carleson condition on the local oscillation of A, so the equivalence survives under a weaker, more natural condition on the coefficients.
  • The optimality examples show the Carleson condition cannot simply be dropped: without it, elliptic measure can be singular with respect to surface measure, so the A∞ hypothesis genuinely carries the geometric conclusion.
  • All constants in the equivalence depend only on dimension, ellipticity, uniformity, Ahlfors regularity, and the A∞ constants, so the result is quantitatively stable under perturbation of the background parameters.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The extrapolation theorem is plausibly a general bootstrapping device: any scale-invariant small-constant geometric conclusion that is stable under sawtooth restriction could be promoted to a large-constant statement, so similar results may hold for other elliptic or p-harmonic measure settings where an analogous small-constant theorem exists.
  • The transference mechanism suggests a testable refinement: the A∞ constants on sawtooth subdomains should control, quantitatively, the 'big pieces of Lipschitz graphs' constants of the boundary, so one could search for an explicit bound on those geometric constants in terms of C0 and θ.
  • For DKP operators whose elliptic measure fails A∞, the theorem predicts that the boundary cannot be uniformly rectifiable; the paper's optimality examples indicate that such failures can arise as limits of operators with finite but growing Carleson norms, which may serve as a template for probing the sharpness of the quantitative constants.
  • The oscillation-based Corollary 6.3 suggests the natural endpoint of the theory is a condition phrased entirely in terms of local oscillation of A, and one could test whether the equivalence persists under a weak-L∞ or BMO-type Carleson version of that condition.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

0 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper proves the large-constant case of the equivalence, for uniform domains with Ahlfors regular boundary in R^n, n ≥ 3, between A∞ absolute continuity of elliptic measure for a divergence-form operator with Dahlberg–Kenig–Pipher coefficients and uniform rectifiability of the boundary, equivalently chord-arc regularity of the domain. The proof is by extrapolation of Carleson measures: assuming the small-constant result of the companion paper [HMMTZ], the authors reduce the main theorem to two technical steps, namely that a small discrete Carleson hypothesis implies a continuous small Carleson estimate on sawtooth subdomains, and that the A∞ property of elliptic measure transfers from a domain to its sawtooth subdomains with uniform constants. The paper also contains an optimality discussion and a corollary extending the result to operators satisfying an oscillation-type Carleson condition.

Significance. If accepted, this paper completes a long program and settles in full the free-boundary direction for the Dahlberg–Kenig–Pipher class: A∞ absolute continuity of elliptic measure forces uniform rectifiability, with no smallness assumption on the Carleson norm. The extrapolation mechanism and the transference of A∞ to sawtooth subdomains are substantive new tools that are likely to be useful beyond this specific theorem. The proof is carefully organized and makes explicit which parts are drawn from the companion small-constant paper; the reliance on companion and preprint results is transparent and appropriate for a two-part work. The optimality examples in Section 6 and the oscillation-variant Corollary 6.3 strengthen the paper's contribution.

minor comments (4)
  1. [§2.2, paragraph after (2.20)] The notation for fattened boxes is inconsistent: I∗∗ is defined twice, once as (1+2τ)I and once as (1+4τ)I; the second occurrence should be I∗∗∗, matching the later use of I∗∗∗ in the definition of U∗∗_Q.
  2. [§3, display (3.12)] There is a typographical error in the definition of β_Q: 'β Q; =' should read 'β_Q :='.
  3. [§5, display (5.30)] In the display 'dist( J, ∂Ω) = dist(J_i, ~Q_i)' the first argument should be J_i rather than J; the current text is a typographical slip.
  4. [§5, Lemma 5.9] The construction of P after (5.12) is potentially confusing: the sentence 'let m1 denote the maximal number of Whitney boxes intersecting I_i' could be read as including boxes outside Ω*, but the actual union used for P is the relabeled union from (5.11), whose boxes belong to the index set N* and therefore have interiors contained in Ω*. An explicit sentence to this effect would eliminate the ambiguity and justify the assertion P ⊂ Ω*.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the large-constant theorem is obtained by a legitimate bootstrap from the small-constant companion theorem plus independent extrapolation and transference arguments.

full rationale

After walking the derivation chain, I find no circular reasoning. The central implication (1) implies (2) in Theorem 1.6 is proved by an extrapolation argument whose inputs are: the small-constant chord-arc theorem from the companion paper [HMMTZ, Theorem 3.10], which is a strictly weaker result proved under a small Carleson norm assumption; the independent extrapolation lemma [HMM1, Lemma 4.5]; the harmonic-function Carleson-measure equivalence of [HMM1] and [GMT]; and the transference theorem 5.1 / Theorem 5.49, which is proved directly from A-infinity on Omega and on fundamental chord-arc subdomains. The latter follows from [KP] and [HMT1], not from the target conclusion. The A-infinity-to-sawtooth transference is load-bearing, but it is not equivalent to Theorem 1.6 by construction: it assumes less and proves A-infinity on the sawtooth domains with constants independent of Q and F. The reviewer-flagged assertion XP in P subset Omega* in Lemma 5.9 is a potential geometric gap in an auxiliary comparison step, because P is a union of fattened Whitney boxes adjacent to I_i and may extend outside the sawtooth; however, a proof gap is not circularity. No fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction, and no uniqueness result is imported from the authors' prior work to force the conclusion. The paper's self-citations are numerous but they support a genuine bootstrap with stronger or independent results, so the appropriate circularity score is 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No empirical free parameters or invented entities appear. The proof introduces many geometric and analytic constants (η, K, τ, γ, ~M, M1), but these are chosen in a standard epsilon-delta manner and are not fitted to data. The central claim rests on the standing geometric and elliptic hypotheses, on the small constant companion theorem, and on several external harmonic analysis results.

assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Ω is a uniform domain with Ahlfors regular boundary and n ≥ 3 (Section 2, Definitions 2.1, 2.8).
    These are the standing geometric hypotheses of Theorem 1.6 and are used throughout the construction of sawtooth domains and dyadic grids.
  • domain assumption A is a uniformly elliptic matrix satisfying (H1) |∇A|δ(·) ∈ L∞ and (H2) |∇A|^2 δ(·) is a Carleson measure (equations (1.3), (1.5)).
    This is the Dahlberg-Kenig-Pipher condition, the optimal coefficient class for which the results are claimed.
  • standard math Small constant case: Theorem 3.10 from the companion paper HMMTZ.
    The extrapolation proof uses the small Carleson norm result as a black box to conclude that sawtooth domains are chord-arc domains. It is a prior theorem by the same authors, not re-proven here.
  • standard math Extrapolation theorem for Carleson measures (Theorem 3.1 from HMM1) and Carleson measure estimate/rectifiability equivalence (Theorem 3.7 from HMM1 and GMT).
    These are external results from the harmonic analysis literature used to convert Carleson measure estimates on bounded harmonic functions into uniform rectifiability.
  • standard math Equivalence between A∞ elliptic measure and the Carleson measure estimate for solutions (Theorem 5.49 from CHMT).
    This theorem, cited from a preprint by overlapping authors, is used to transfer the A∞ property to general sawtooth domains by an exhaustion argument.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Uniform rectifiability and elliptic operators satisfying a Carleson measure condition. Part II: The large constant case." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/2ODIHZA2

@misc{pith2026190803161,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Uniform rectifiability and elliptic operators satisfying a Carleson measure condition. Part II: The large constant case},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/2ODIHZA2}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1908.03161}
}
abstract

The present paper, along with its companion [Hofmann, Martell, Mayboroda, Toro, Zhao, arXiv:1710.06157], establishes the correspondence between the properties of the solutions of a class of PDEs and the geometry of sets in Euclidean space. We settle the question of whether (quantitative) absolute continuity of the elliptic measure with respect to the surface measure and uniform rectifiability of the boundary are equivalent, in an optimal class of divergence form elliptic operators satisfying a suitable Carleson measure condition. The result can be viewed as a quantitative analogue of the Wiener criterion adapted to the singular $L^p$ data case. The first step in this direction was taken in our previous paper [Hofmann, Martell, Mayboroda, Toro, Zhao, arXiv:1710.06157], where we considered the case in which the desired Carleson measure condition on the coefficients holds with sufficiently small constant. In this paper we establish the final, general result, that is, the "large constant case". The key elements of our approach are a powerful extrapolation argument, which provides a general pathway to self-improve scale-invariant small constant estimates, as well as a new mechanism to transfer quantitative absolute continuity of elliptic measure between a domain and its subdomains.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

48 extracted references · 48 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Aikawa and K

    H. Aikawa and K. Hirata, Doubling conditions for harmonic measure in John domains. Ann. Inst. Fourier (Grenoble) 58 (2008), no. 2, 429--445

    work page 2008

  2. [2]

    Akman, M

    M. Akman, M. Badger, S. Hofmann, J.M. Martell, Rectifiability and elliptic measures on 1-sided NTA domains with Ahlfors-David regular boundaries. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 369 (2017), no. 8, 2017, 5711--5745

    work page 2017

  3. [3]

    Akman, M

    M. Akman, M. Badger, S. Hofmann, and J.M. Martell, Rectifiability and elliptic measures on 1-sided NTA domains with Ahlfors-David regular boundaries. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 369 (2017), no. 8, 2017, 5711--5745

    work page 2017

  4. [5]

    Azzam, S

    J. Azzam, S. Hofmann, J.M. Martel, S. Mayboroda, M. Mourgoglou, X.Tolsa, and A. Volberg

    work page

  5. [6]

    Azzam, Semi-uniform domains and a characterization of the A_ property for harmonic measure

    J. Azzam, Semi-uniform domains and a characterization of the A_ property for harmonic measure. Int. Math. Res. Not. (2019)

    work page 2019

  6. [7]

    Uniform rectifiability, elliptic measure, square functions, and $\varepsilon$-approximability via an ACF monotonicity formula

    J. Azzam, J. Garnett, M. Mourgoglou, and X. Tolsa, Uniform rectifiability, elliptic measure, square functions, and -approximability via an ACF monotonicity formula. Preprint, arXiv:1612.02650

    work page Pith review arXiv

  7. [8]

    Martell, S.\,Mayboroda, M.\,Mourgoglou, X.\, Tolsa, A.\,Volberg, Rectifiability of harmonic measure

    J.\, Azzam, S.\,Hofmann, J.M. Martell, S.\,Mayboroda, M.\,Mourgoglou, X.\, Tolsa, A.\,Volberg, Rectifiability of harmonic measure. Geom. Funct. Anal. 26 (2016), no. 3, 703--728

    work page 2016

  8. [9]

    Harmonic measure and quantitative connectivity: geometric characterization of the $L^p$-solvability of the Dirichlet problem

    J. Azzam, S. Hofmann, J. M. Martell, M. Mourgoglou, and X. Tolsa, Harmonic measure and quantitative connectivity: geometric characterization of the L^p -solvability of the Dirichlet problem. Preprint, arXiv:1907.07102

    work page Pith review arXiv 1907

Show all 48 references
  1. [10]

    Azzam, S

    J. Azzam, S. Hofmann, J. M. Martell, K. Nystr\"om, and T. Toro, A new characterization of chord-arc domains. J. European Math. Soc. (JEMS) 19 (2017), no. 4, 967--981

    2017

  2. [11]

    Azzam, M

    J. Azzam, M. Mourgoglou, and X. Tolsa, Harmonic measure and quantitative connectivity: geometric characterization of the L^p -solvability of the Dirichlet problem. Part II. Preprint, arXiv:1803.07975

    arXiv

  3. [12]

    Caffarelli, E.B

    L.A. Caffarelli, E.B. Fabes, and C.E. Kenig, Completely singular elliptic-harmonic measures. Indiana Univ. Math. J. 30 (1981), no. 6, 917--924

    1981

  4. [13]

    Carleson, Interpolation by bounded analytic functions and the corona problem, Ann

    L. Carleson, Interpolation by bounded analytic functions and the corona problem, Ann. of Math. (2) 76 (1962), 547--559

    1962

  5. [14]

    Carleson and J

    L. Carleson and J. Garnett, Interpolating sequences and separation properties, J. Analyse Math. 28 (1975), 273--299

    1975

  6. [15]

    Cavero, S

    J. Cavero, S. Hofmann, J.M. Martell, and T. Toro, Perturbations of elliptic operators in 1-sided chord-arc domains. Part II: Non-symmetric operators and Carleson measure estimates. Preprint, arXiv:1908.02268

    1908 arXiv

  7. [16]

    Christ, A T(b) theorem with remarks on analytic capacity and the Cauchy integral

    M. Christ, A T(b) theorem with remarks on analytic capacity and the Cauchy integral. Colloq. Math. , LX/LXI (1990), 601--628

    1990

  8. [17]

    Dahlberg, D.S

    B.E. Dahlberg, D.S. Jerison, and C.E. Kenig, Area integral estimates for elliptic differential operators with nonsmooth coefficients. Ark. Mat. 22 (1984), no. 1, 97--108

    1984

  9. [18]

    David and D

    G. David and D. Jerison, Lipschitz approximation to hypersurfaces, harmonic measure, and singular integrals. Indiana Univ. Math. J. 39 (1990), no. 3, 831--845

    1990

  10. [19]

    David and S

    G. David and S. Semmes, Singular integrals and rectifiable sets in R ^n : Au-dela des graphes lipschitziens. Asterisque 193 (1991)

    1991

  11. [20]

    David and S

    G. David and S. Semmes, Analysis of and on Uniformly Rectifiable Sets . Math. Surveys Monogr. 38, AMS 1993

    1993

  12. [21]

    Dindos, C

    M. Dindos, C. Kenig, and J. Pipher, BMO solvability and the A_ condition for elliptic operators . J. Geom. Anal. 21 (2011), no. 1, 78--95

    2011

  13. [22]

    Fefferman, C

    R. Fefferman, C. Kenig, and J. Pipher, The theory of weights and the Dirichlet problem for elliptic equations. Annals of Math. 134 (1991), 65-124

    1991

  14. [23]

    Garnett, M

    J. Garnett, M. Mourgoglou, and X. Tolsa. Uniform rectifiability in terms of Carleson measure estimates and -approximability of bounded harmonic functions. Duke Math. J. 167 (2018), no. 8, 1473--1524

    2018

  15. [24]

    Quantitative absolute continuity of harmonic measure and the Dirichlet problem: a survey of recent progress, Acta Mathematica Sinica, English Series 35 (2019) (Special Volume in honor of the 65th birthday of Carlos Kenig), 1011-1026

    2019

  16. [25]

    Hofmann, P

    S. Hofmann, P. Le, J.M. Martell, and K. Nystr\"om, The weak- A_ property of harmonic and p -harmonic measures . Anal. PDE 10 (2017), 513--558

    2017

  17. [26]

    Hofmann and J.M

    S. Hofmann and J.M. Martell, Uniform rectifiability and harmonic measure I: Uniform rectifiability implies Poisson kernels in L^p . Ann. Sci. \'Ecole Norm. Sup. 47 (2014), no. 3, 577--654

    2014

  18. [27]

    Hofmann, and J.M

    S. Hofmann, and J.M. Martell, Uniform Rectifiability and harmonic measure IV: Ahlfors regularity plus Poisson kernels in L^p implies uniform rectifiability. Preprint, arXiv:1505.06499

    arXiv

  19. [28]

    Hofmann, and J.M

    S. Hofmann, and J.M. Martell, Harmonic measure and quantitative connectivity: geometric characterization of the L^p -solvability of the Dirichlet problem. Part I. Preprint, arXiv:1712.03696

    arXiv

  20. [29]

    Hofmann, J.M

    S. Hofmann, J.M. Martell, and S. Mayboroda, Uniform rectifiability, Carleson measure estimates, and approximation of harmonic functions. Duke Math. J. 165 (2016), no. 12, 2331--2389

    2016

  21. [30]

    Hofmann, J.M

    S. Hofmann, J.M. Martell, and S. Mayboroda, Transference of scale-invariant estimates from Lipschitz to non-tangentially accessible to uniformly rectifiable domains. Preprint, arXiv:1904.13116

    1904 arXiv

  22. [31]

    Hofmann, J.M

    S. Hofmann, J.M. Martell, S. Mayboroda, T. Toro, and Z. Zhao, Uniform rectifiability and elliptic operators satisfying a Carleson measure condition. Part I: The small constant case. Preprint, arXiv:1710.06157

    arXiv

  23. [32]

    Hofmann, J.M

    S. Hofmann, J.M. Martell, and T. Toro, A_ implies NTA for a class of variable coefficient elliptic operators. J. Differential Equations 263 (2017), no. 10, 6147--6188

    2017

  24. [33]

    Hofmann, J.M

    S. Hofmann, J.M. Martell, and T. Toro, Elliptic operators on non-smooth domains. Book in preparation

  25. [34]

    Hofmann, J.M

    S. Hofmann, J.M. Martell, and I. Uriarte-Tuero, Uniform rectifiability and harmonic measure II: Poisson kernels in L^p imply uniform rectifiability. Duke Math. J. 163 (2014), no. 8, 1601--1654

    2014

  26. [35]

    Jerison and C

    D. Jerison and C. Kenig, Boundary behavior of harmonic functions in nontangentially accessible domains, Adv. in Math. 46 (1982), no. 1, 80--147

    1982

  27. [36]

    Kenig, Harmonic analysis techniques for second order elliptic boundary value problems

    C. Kenig, Harmonic analysis techniques for second order elliptic boundary value problems . CBMS Regional Conference Series in Mathematics, 83. Published for the Conference Board of the Mathematical Sciences, Washington, DC; by the American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 1994

    1994

  28. [37]

    Kenig, B

    C. Kenig, B. Kirchheim, J. Pipher, T. Toro, Square functions and the A_ property of elliptic measures . J. Geom. Anal. 26 (2016), no. 3, 2383--2383

    2016

  29. [38]

    Kenig, and J

    C. Kenig, and J. Pipher, The Dirichlet problem for elliptic equations with drift terms. Publ. Mat. 45 (2001), 199--217

    2001

  30. [39]

    Lewis and M

    J. Lewis and M. Murray, The method of layer potentials for the heat equation in time-varying domains, Mem. Amer. Math. Soc. 114 (1995), no. 545

    1995

  31. [40]

    J. L. Lewis and A. Vogel, Symmetry theorems and uniform rectifiability, Boundary Value Problems Vol. 2007 (2007), article ID 030190, 59 pages

    2007

  32. [41]

    Modica, and S

    L. Modica, and S. Mortola, Construction of a singular elliptic-harmonic measure. Manuscripta Math. 33 (1980/81), no. 1, 81--98

    1980

  33. [42]

    Nazarov, X

    F. Nazarov, X. Tolsa, and A.Volberg, On the uniform rectifiability of AD-regular measures with bounded Riesz transform operator: the case of codimension 1. Acta Math. 213 (2014), no. 2, 237--321

    2014

  34. [43]

    Poggi Cevallos, Failure to slide: a brief note on the interplay between the Kenig-Pipher condition and the absolute continuity of elliptic measures, arXiv:1912.10115

    B.G. Poggi Cevallos, Failure to slide: a brief note on the interplay between the Kenig-Pipher condition and the absolute continuity of elliptic measures, arXiv:1912.10115

    1912 arXiv

  35. [44]

    F. and M. Riesz, \"Uber die randwerte einer analtischen funktion, Compte Rendues du Quatri\`eme Congr\`es des Math\' e maticiens Scandinaves , Stockholm 1916, Almqvists and Wilksels, Upsala, 1920

    1916

  36. [45]

    Rios, L^p regularity of the Dirichlet problem for elliptic equations with singular drift

    C. Rios, L^p regularity of the Dirichlet problem for elliptic equations with singular drift. Publ. Mat. 50 (2006) 475-507

    2006

  37. [46]

    Semmes, Analysis vs

    S. Semmes, Analysis vs. geometry on a class of rectifiable hypersurfaces in R^n . Indiana Univ. Math. J. 39 (1990), 1005--1035

    1990

  38. [47]

    E. M. Stein, Singular Integrals and Differentiability Properties of Functions . Princeton Mathematical Series, No. 30. Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.J., 1970

    1970

  39. [48]

    N.\,Wiener, The Dirichlet problem , J. Math. Phys. 3 (1924), pp. 127--146

    1924

  40. [49]

    Zhao, BMO solvability and the A_ condition of the elliptic measure in uniform domains

    Z. Zhao, BMO solvability and the A_ condition of the elliptic measure in uniform domains . J. Geom. Anal. (2018) 28, no. 3, 866--908

    2018

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.