Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 2 cited by

Conformal Operator Flows of the Deconfined Quantum Criticality from $\mathrm{SO}(5)$ to $\mathrm{O}(4)$

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read This paper claims the O(4) deconfined quantum critical point is not a genuine conformal fixed point: a relevant scalar operator with $\Delta_S \approx 2.845 \pm 0.010$ survives the symmetry reduction from SO(5) to O(4), making the…

desk verdict A careful fuzzy-sphere operator-flow study from SO(5) to O(4) that plausibly shows a relevant singlet persisting, but the pseudo-criticality conclusion rests on an unquantified systematic error and an unresolved theta-term discrepancy. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.01322 v1 pith:2PG3SIU7 submitted 2025-07-02 cond-mat.str-el

Shuai Yang , Liang-dong Hu , Chao Han , W. Zhu , Yan Chen This is my paper
classification cond-mat.str-el
keywords deconfinedquantumcriticalitypseudo-criticalityfuzzysphereregularizationstate-operatorcorrespondenceconformaloperatorflowSO(5)toO(4)symmetrybreakingavoidedlevelcrossingrelevantscalar
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Deconfined quantum criticality was conjectured to be a genuine (2+1)-dimensional conformal field theory, but accumulating evidence suggests it never quite is. This paper studies the Neel-to-VBS transition in a microscopic model whose global symmetry can be tuned continuously from SO(5) to O(4), using the fuzzy sphere regularization to read off the renormalization group flow of conformal operators. The central claim is that the relevant parity-even scalar operator $S$, first found at the SO(5) point, persists at the O(4) transition with scaling dimension $\Delta_S \approx 2.845 \pm 0.010$ at $u_5/u = -0.75$. Because $\Delta_S < 3$, the would-be O(4) fixed point is unstable, and the transition is pseudo-critical: the flow lingers near a fixed point that is not actually reached, producing an approximate conformal symmetry and a weak first-order transition in the thermodynamic limit. If correct, this closes a long debate about whether the O(4) easy-plane DQCP is a conformal point, and it demonstrates that operator flows themselves can be observed in a microscopic calculation.

What carries the argument

The machinery is the fuzzy sphere regularization combined with the state-operator correspondence: the model is projected onto the lowest Landau level of fermions on a sphere threaded by a monopole field, exact diagonalization yields eigenenergies, and the correspondence $\delta E_n = \frac{v}{R}(\Delta_n - \Delta_0)$ converts energy gaps into the scaling dimensions $\Delta_n$ of CFT primaries. The RG flow is traced by varying the single parameter $u_5/u$ from 1 (exact SO(5)) to $-1$ (deep O(4)), with the optimal critical coupling fixed by demanding $\Delta_{T^{\mu\nu}} = 3$ and $\Delta_{J^\mu} = 2$ simultaneously. The O(4) quantum numbers are the highest weights $[j,k]$ of the two $\mathrm{SU}(2)$ subgroups of $\mathrm{SO}(4)$, and the branching rules of $\mathrm{so}(5) \supset \mathrm{so}(4)$ dictate which O(4) fields each SO(5) primary decomposes into. Finally, the avoided level crossing between $S$ and $T_{[0,0]}$ is diagnosed by the operator-content overlap $F_O = \langle(S, T_{[0,0]})|T_{55}|I\rangle / \lVert T_{55}|I\rangle\rVert$, where $T_{55}$ is the $n_5 n_5$ component of the SO(5) rank-2 tensor that carries the identity of $T_{[0,0]}$.

What would settle it

Compute $\Delta_S$ at larger system sizes and at parameter values between $u_5/u = -0.75$ and the would-be fixed point: if $\Delta_S$ extrapolates to 3 or above in the thermodynamic limit, the relevant-singlet claim is falsified and the O(4) transition could be genuinely conformal.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

By tracking the low-lying spectrum of a four-flavor interacting fermion model on the fuzzy sphere as the anisotropy $u_5/u$ is lowered from 1, the paper shows how the SO(5) conformal primaries decompose into O(4) representations $[j,k]$ of $\mathrm{SU}(2)\times\mathrm{SU}(2)$: the SO(5) order parameter splits into the O(4) vector $\phi_{[1/2,1/2]}$ plus a gapped parity-odd scalar, the rank-2 tensor splits into $T_{[1,1]}$, $T_{[0,0]}$ and a gapped component, and so on. Along this flow, the two lowest parity-even scalars, $S$ and $T_{[0,0]}$, show an avoided level crossing: their scaling dimensions approach, reach a minimal separation near $u_5 \approx 0.1$, and their operator content, diagnosed by the overlap with the traceless tensor $T_{55}$, is exchanged. At $u_5/u = -0.75$ the paper extracts the O(4) conformal data: $\Delta_{\phi_{[1/2,1/2]}} \approx 0.555 \pm 0.010$ ($\eta \approx 0.11 \pm 0.02$), $\Delta_{T_{[1,1]}} \approx 1.453 \pm 0.025$ ($\nu \approx 0.65 \pm 0.01$), a relevant $6\pi$-monopole with $\Delta \approx 2.717$, and a relevant parity-even scalar $S$ with $\Delta_S \approx 2.845 \pm 0.010$. The low-lying descendants of each primary sit at integer spacings, indicating an approximate conformal symmetry, but the relevant $S$ means no genuine conformal fixed point is reached; the paper concludes that the O(4) DQCP lives in a pseudo-critical regime, sharing the fate of the SO(5) case.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the measured energy gaps at $u_5/u = -0.75$ really do encode the scaling dimensions of the would-be O(4) critical theory, meaning the system is close enough to the fixed point that the mapping from spectrum to operator dimensions is trustworthy, even though the fixed point is never exactly reached and conformal symmetry is only approximate.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The easy-plane Neel-to-VBS transition in O(4)-symmetric models is not a genuine conformal transition: the relevant singlet $S$ forces a weak first-order transition, so measured 'critical' behavior is pseudo-criticality.
  • The O(4) DQCP inherits the key features of the SO(5) DQCP, namely the same relevant singlet $S$ and the same pseudo-critical interpretation, so the two are governed by the same physics despite the reduced symmetry.
  • The $6\pi$-monopole operator is relevant ($\Delta \approx 2.717$) and higher monopoles are irrelevant, so on lattices that allow $6\pi$-monopole events (e.g. honeycomb) the O(4) transition is unstable to that perturbation, while other monopole perturbations are harmless.
  • Operator decomposition under symmetry reduction follows the branching rules with the parity-odd split components becoming gapped non-conformal fields, and the same flow pattern, including avoided level crossings, appears in the well-understood O(3)-to-O(2) Wilson-Fisher case, indicating the phenomenon is generic to RG flows between fixed points.
  • The extracted exponents $\nu \approx 0.65 \pm 0.01$ and $\eta \approx 0.11 \pm 0.02$ are what an observer would measure near the O(4) DQCP, and they differ from any genuine O(4)-symmetric CFT.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the relevant singlet $S$ is robust to the symmetry-breaking pattern, pseudo-criticality is likely the generic fate of the Neel-to-VBS transition in any lattice realization, which would explain the persistent disagreements in Monte Carlo studies without invoking a true SO(5) or O(4) fixed point.
  • The paper's own loose end, the absence of the parity-odd scalar $\sim \epsilon_{\alpha\beta\gamma\delta}\phi^\alpha \partial_t \phi^\beta \partial_x \phi^\gamma \partial_y \phi^\delta$ expected from the $\theta$-term description, suggests that either the topological description of the O(4) DQCP needs revision or the operator sits at a scaling dimension too high for the current spectrum to resolve;
  • The overlap-based identity tracking used here could be applied to other symmetry-reduction flows, such as Wilson-Fisher $\mathrm{O}(N) \to \mathrm{O}(N-1)$ chains or the Potts and loop-model flows, to decide case by case whether an apparent fixed point is genuine or a walking region; the O(3)-to-O(2) control in the Supplemental Material is a first validation of this diagnostic.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The manuscript studies the Néel-to-VBS transition in a four-flavor interacting fermion model regularized on the fuzzy sphere, with a parameter u5 that breaks the global symmetry from SO(5) to O(4). Using exact diagonalization and the state-operator correspondence, the authors track the running scaling dimensions of low-lying O(4) primaries as a function of u5/u. They find that SO(5) primaries decompose into O(4) multiplets, that the two singlet operators S and T[0,0] undergo an avoided level crossing with an exchange of operator content, and that a parity-even scalar S remains relevant, with Δ_S ≈ 2.845 ± 0.010 at u5/u = -0.75. On this basis they conclude that the O(4) DQCP is not a genuine conformal fixed point and instead exhibits pseudo-critical behavior analogous to the SO(5) case. The supplemental material supplies branching rules, spectral-flow data, and an O(3)→O(2) benchmark flow.

Significance. If confirmed, the result is significant: it extends the relevant-singlet pseudo-criticality mechanism from the SO(5) DQCP to the O(4) DQCP and offers a microscopic view of how conformal operator content evolves along an RG flow. The paper is methodologically valuable, demonstrating that fuzzy-sphere exact diagonalization can resolve operator decomposition and avoided crossings in a controlled way, and it provides explicit finite-size data and group-theoretic branching rules. The extraction of Δ_S is not circular in the usual sense: the velocity is calibrated with the conserved current and stress tensor, while the scalar dimension is read from the spectrum rather than fitted. The O(2) benchmark in the supplement is a useful check, though it also shows that systematic offsets of order 0.05 must be controlled before the central quantitative claim can be taken at face value.

major comments (3)
  1. [Numerical results, Table I] The central claim that Δ_S ≈ 2.845 ± 0.010 at u5/u = -0.75 lies below 3 requires the spectrum to be close to the would-be O(4) fixed point, but the text concedes that "the fixed point is not exactly hit since the conformal symmetry is not exact" and no estimate is given for the systematic correction from the relevant perturbation S itself (the operator whose dimension is being measured) or from irrelevant operators. The O(3)→O(2) benchmark in Supplement §V gives an offset of about 0.05 for the analogous scalar (1.5609 extracted versus 1.51136 from bootstrap), but the distance from the fixed point in that flow need not match the SO(5)→O(4) case, so it does not bound the error in 2.845 ± 0.010. Please provide a controlled estimate of these corrections, for example by including leading correction-to-scaling terms in the finite-size/flow-parameter extrapolation, by extrapolating u5/u toward the would-be fixed point, or by using the O(2) benchmark to assign a conservative systematic error that still keeps Δ_S below 3.
  2. [Supplement §V, last paragraph] The supplement states that "the precise operator content of the relevant singlet S at the approximate SO(5) and O(4) fixed points remains unclear, potentially due to the corresponding complex fixed points lying a finite distance away from the real axis in the complex plane." This is load-bearing for the claim that the same relevant scalar S persists from SO(5) to O(4), because the avoided-crossing analysis in Fig. 3 relies on the overlap with T55, and the supplement also reports that those overlaps remain small throughout the flow. Please identify the O(4) S by an independent criterion, such as its descendant tower at Δ_S + integers, a systematic overlap matrix in the singlet sector, or a computed OPE coefficient, rather than by continuity of an eigenvalue alone.
  3. [Summary and discussion, final remark] The paper acknowledges that the topological θ-term description of the O(4) DQCP predicts a parity-odd scalar ∼ ε_{αβγδ} φ_α ∂_t φ_β ∂_x φ_γ ∂_y φ_δ, yet the numerical spectrum shows no additional relevant parity-odd scalar. This unresolved discrepancy is a correctness risk for the claim that the operator content of the O(4) DQCP has been fully characterized. Please either construct this operator on the fuzzy sphere and bound its scaling dimension or overlap with the parity-odd scalar candidates, or explain explicitly why it is expected to be gapped or absent from the low-lying spectrum in this regularization.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Model and method, after Eq. (1)] The control parameter u5/u is used throughout, but u is never defined; please state whether u denotes u_N, u_K, or some combination, and explain how the optimal u at each system size in Table I is determined from the conditions Δ(T_{μν}) = 3 and Δ(J_μ) = 2.
  2. [Eq. (2)] In the definition of T55(r), the operator n(r) in the traceless combination is not defined; if it is the trace ∑_i n_i(r) n_i(r'), please state this explicitly.
  3. [Table I] The quoted uncertainty Δ_S ≈ 2.845 ± 0.010 is not defined; it should be stated whether this error comes from finite-size extrapolation, from the drift across u5/u ∈ [-1,-0.5], or from both sources.
  4. [Introduction and Supplement §V] There are minor typos, including "[46 ? –48]" in the introduction and "Beacuse" in the last paragraph of Supplement §V, and the supplement's caveat about the small overlaps of S and T[0,0] with the probe operators should be reflected in the main-text discussion of Fig. 3.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the relevant scalar S is measured from the ED spectrum after a standard velocity calibration, and the SO(5) self-citation is a benchmark, not a load-bearing input.

full rationale

This paper does not exhibit a circular derivation. The central quantity, the scaling dimension Δ_S ≈ 2.845 of the parity-even singlet, is obtained by exact diagonalization on the fuzzy sphere and read off from the energy spectrum at u5/u = −0.75 after calibrating the velocity v using the conserved current Δ(Jμ)=2 and stress tensor Δ(Tμν)=3 (Model and method; Table I). This calibration is a standard state-operator correspondence procedure; S is not a fitted parameter, and the paper does not use the SO(5) result to set Δ_S. The SO(5) prior [44], which shares coauthors with the present work, is used as a benchmark and as the origin of the model and the operator-labeling recipe, but the O(4) spectrum is computed independently here, and the pseudo-criticality interpretation is supported by the measured value Δ_S < 3 together with the slow drift of the low-lying dimensions over u5/u ∈ [−1,−0.5]. The paper explicitly admits that the fixed point is not exactly hit ('Even though the fixed point is not exactly hit since the conformal symmetry is not exact...'), which means the extracted dimensions may contain corrections from the relevant perturbation itself; this is a systematic-error/correctness risk, not a definitional reduction. The supplement's O(3)→O(2) benchmark against known bootstrap data provides an external check of the method. Consequently, no step reduces to its own input by construction, and the only notable self-citation is not load-bearing.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim relies on the fuzzy sphere regularization and the emergent conformal symmetry assumption, plus the group-theoretic branching rules and the identification of T55 with T[0,0]. No new particles or entities are introduced.

assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption State-operator correspondence maps the low-energy eigenstates of the fuzzy sphere Hamiltonian to CFT operators, with eigenenergies proportional to scaling dimensions.
    This is the foundation of the fuzzy sphere method used throughout the paper. If the emergent IR theory is not a CFT, the extracted scaling dimensions are not meaningful.
  • domain assumption The low-energy physics of the model is described by a 3D nonlinear sigma model with a level-1 Wess-Zumino-Witten term as the symmetry is tuned.
    Used in Fig. 1(b) and the discussion to interpret the pseudo-critical regime. The paper references [3,55,56] for this mapping.
  • standard math The branching rules of so(5) ⊃ so(4) provide the correct decomposition of SO(5) primaries into O(4) representations.
    Standard group theory, quoted in Sec. I.B of the Supplemental Material, used to label the split operators in Figs. 2 and S2.
  • domain assumption The operator T55(r) defined in Eq. (2) captures the O(4) singlet component T[0,0] of the SO(5) rank-2 tensor, so that its overlap with the lowest two singlets diagnoses the avoided level crossing.
    The paper states 'T55 belongs to one of the 14 components of the SO(5) rank-2 tensor representation and it should capture the essence of T[0,0]'. The supplement later notes the operator content of S remains unclear, so this identification is not fully established.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Conformal Operator Flows of the Deconfined Quantum Criticality from $\mathrm{SO}(5)$ to $\mathrm{O}(4)$." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/2PG3SIU7

@misc{pith2026250701322,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Conformal Operator Flows of the Deconfined Quantum Criticality from $\mathrmSO(5)$ to $\mathrmO(4)$},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/2PG3SIU7}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.01322}
}
abstract

The deconfined quantum critical point (DQCP), which separates two distinct symmetry-broken phases, was conjectured to be an example of (2+1)D criticality beyond the standard Landau-Ginzburg-Wilson paradigm. However, this hypothesis has been met with challenges and remains elusive. Here, we perform a systematic study of a microscopic model realizing the DQCP with a global symmetry tunable from $\mathrm{SO}(5)$ to $\mathrm{O}(4)$. Through the lens of fuzzy sphere regularization, we uncover the key information on the renormalization group flow of conformal operators. We reveal O(4) primaries decomposed from original SO(5) primaries by tracing conformal operator content and identifying the ``avoided level crossing'' in the operator flows. In particular, we find that the existence of a scalar operator, in support of the nature of pseudo-criticality, remains relevant, persisting from $\mathrm{SO}(5)$ to $\mathrm{O}(4)$ DQCP. This work not only uncovers the nature of O(4) DQCP but also demonstrates that the fuzzy sphere scheme offers a unique perspective on the renormalization group flow of operators in the study of critical phenomena.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2507.01322 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. (a) Schematic phase diagram of the model in Eq. 1, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. Evolution of low-lying operators with varying [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. FIG. 4. The operator spectra of the conformal multiplets for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_4.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Chern-Simons-matter conformal field theory on fuzzy sphere: Confinement transition of Kalmeyer-Laughlin chiral spin liquid

    cond-mat.str-el 2025-07 conditional novelty 8.0 of 10

    A fuzzy-sphere exact diagonalization study shows the fIQH to bFQH transition is continuous, with emergent conformal symmetry and a single relevant singlet of scaling dimension Delta_S = 1.52(18).

  2. The $O(N)$ Free-Scalar and Wilson-Fisher Conformal Field Theories on the Fuzzy Sphere

    cond-mat.str-el 2025-12 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Fuzzy-sphere Hamiltonians realize the O(2), O(3) and O(4) Wilson-Fisher and free-scalar CFTs numerically, with spectra and correlators matching conformal bootstrap expectations.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

78 extracted references · 53 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    avoided level crossing

    The discrepancy of the finite-size scaling cannot recon- cile with regular ansatz of second-order transitions [18– 21]; 2) The extracted critical exponents are incompati- ble with bounds from conformal bootstrap calculations [22, 23]; 3) The calculations of order parameters experi- ence a discontinuity at the transition point [8, 24, 25]; 4) Quantum entan...

    arXiv 2025

  2. [2]

    Senthil, A

    T. Senthil, A. Vishwanath, L. Balents, S. Sachdev, and M. P. A. Fisher, Deconfined quantum critical points, Science 303, 1490 (2004), https://www.science.org/doi/pdf/10.1126/science.1091806

    doi:10.1126/science.1091806 2004

  3. [3]

    Read and S

    N. Read and S. Sachdev, Spin-peierls, valence-bond solid, and n´ eel ground states of low-dimensional quantum an- tiferromagnets, Phys. Rev. B 42, 4568 (1990)

    work page 1990

  4. [4]

    Chap- ter 14, pp

    T.Senthil, Deconfined quantum critical points: A review, in 50 Years of the Renormalization Group, Chap. Chap- ter 14, pp. 169–195

    work page

  5. [5]

    Senthil, L

    T. Senthil, L. Balents, S. Sachdev, A. Vishwanath, and M. P. A. Fisher, Quantum criticality beyond the landau- ginzburg-wilson paradigm, Phys. Rev. B 70, 144407 (2004)

    work page 2004

  6. [6]

    J. Lou, A. W. Sandvik, and N. Kawashima, Anti- ferromagnetic to valence-bond-solid transitions in two- dimensional SU(n) heisenberg models with multispin in- teractions, Phys. Rev. B 80, 180414 (2009)

    work page 2009

  7. [7]

    A. W. Sandvik, Evidence for deconfined quantum criti- cality in a two-dimensional heisenberg model with four- 5 spin interactions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 227202 (2007)

    work page 2007

  8. [8]

    Serna and A

    P. Serna and A. Nahum, Emergence and spontaneous breaking of approximate O(4) symmetry at a weakly first-order deconfined phase transition, Phys. Rev. B 99, 195110 (2019)

    work page 2019

Show all 78 references
  1. [9]

    Nahum, P

    A. Nahum, P. Serna, J. T. Chalker, M. Ortu˜ no, and A. M. Somoza, Emergent so(5) symmetry at the n´ eel to valence-bond-solid transition, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 267203 (2015)

    2015

  2. [10]

    Liu, X.-T

    W.-Y. Liu, X.-T. Zhang, Z. Wang, S.-S. Gong, W.-Q. Chen, and Z.-C. Gu, Quantum criticality with emergent symmetry in the extended shastry-sutherland model, Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 026502 (2024)

    2024

  3. [11]

    J. Y. Lee, Y.-Z. You, S. Sachdev, and A. Vishwanath, Sig- natures of a deconfined phase transition on the shastry- sutherland lattice: Applications to quantum critical srcu2(bo3)2, Phys. Rev. X 9, 041037 (2019)

    2019

  4. [12]

    Zhang, Y.-C

    X.-F. Zhang, Y.-C. He, S. Eggert, R. Moessner, and F. Pollmann, Continuous easy-plane deconfined phase transition on the kagome lattice, Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 115702 (2018)

    2018

  5. [13]

    J. Yang, A. W. Sandvik, and L. Wang, Quantum crit- icality and spin liquid phase in the shastry-sutherland model, Phys. Rev. B 105, L060409 (2022)

    2022

  6. [14]

    Y. Q. Qin, Y.-Y. He, Y.-Z. You, Z.-Y. Lu, A. Sen, A. W. Sandvik, C. Xu, and Z. Y. Meng, Duality between the deconfined quantum-critical point and the bosonic topo- logical transition, Phys. Rev. X 7, 031052 (2017)

    2017

  7. [15]

    D’Emidio and R

    J. D’Emidio and R. K. Kaul, First-order superfluid to valence-bond solid phase transitions in easy-plane SU( n) magnets for small n, Phys. Rev. B 93, 054406 (2016)

    2016

  8. [16]

    Li, S.-K

    Z.-X. Li, S.-K. Jian, and H. Yao, Deconfined quantum criticality and emergent so(5) symmetry in fermionic sys- tems (2019), arXiv:1904.10975 [cond-mat.str-el]

    2019 arXiv

  9. [17]

    Y. Liu, Z. Wang, T. Sato, M. Hohenadler, C. Wang, W. Guo, and F. F. Assaad, Superconductivity from the condensation of topological defects in a quan- tum spin-hall insulator, Nature Communications 10, 10.1038/s41467-019-10372-0 (2019)

    2019 doi

  10. [18]

    Jiang, M

    F.-J. Jiang, M. Nyfeler, S. Chandrasekharan, and U.- J. Wiese, From an antiferromagnet to a valence bond solid: evidence for a first-order phase transition, Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment 2008, P02009 (2008)

    2008

  11. [19]

    C. Wang, A. Nahum, M. A. Metlitski, C. Xu, and T. Senthil, Deconfined quantum critical points: Symme- tries and dualities, Phys. Rev. X 7, 031051 (2017)

    2017

  12. [20]

    K. Chen, Y. Huang, Y. Deng, A. B. Kuklov, N. V. Prokof’ev, and B. V. Svistunov, Deconfined criticality flow in the heisenberg model with ring-exchange interac- tions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 185701 (2013)

    2013

  13. [21]

    A. B. Kuklov, M. Matsumoto, N. V. Prokof’ev, B. V. Svistunov, and M. Troyer, Deconfined criticality: Generic first-order transition in the su(2) symmetry case, Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 050405 (2008)

    2008

  14. [22]

    Nakayama and T

    Y. Nakayama and T. Ohtsuki, Necessary condition for emergent symmetry from the conformal bootstrap, Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 131601 (2016)

    2016

  15. [23]

    H. Shao, W. Guo, and A. W. Sandvik, Quantum crit- icality with two length scales, Science 352, 213 (2016), https://www.science.org/doi/pdf/10.1126/science.aad5007

    2016 doi

  16. [24]

    D’Emidio, A

    J. D’Emidio, A. Eberharter, and A. L¨ auchli, Diagnos- ing weakly first-order phase transitions by coupling to order parameters, SciPost Physics 15, 10.21468/scipost- phys.15.2.061 (2023)

    2023 doi

  17. [25]

    Li, Conformality and self-duality of nf=2 qed3, Physics Letters B 831, 137192 (2022)

    Z. Li, Conformality and self-duality of nf=2 qed3, Physics Letters B 831, 137192 (2022)

    2022

  18. [26]

    Z. Deng, L. Liu, W. Guo, and H.-Q. Lin, Diagnosing quantum phase transition order and deconfined criticality via entanglement entropy, Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 100402 (2024)

    2024

  19. [27]

    B. Zhao, P. Weinberg, and A. W. Sandvik, Symmetry- enhanced discontinuous phase transition in a two- dimensional quantum magnet, Nature Physics 15, 678–682 (2019)

    2019

  20. [28]

    J. L. Cardy, Conformal invariance and universality in finite-size scaling, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General 17, L385 (1984)

    1984

  21. [29]

    W. Zhu, C. Han, E. Huffman, J. S. Hofmann, and Y.- C. He, Uncovering conformal symmetry in the 3d ising transition: State-operator correspondence from a quan- tum fuzzy sphere regularization, Phys. Rev. X13, 021009 (2023)

    2023

  22. [30]

    C. Han, L. Hu, and W. Zhu, Conformal operator content of the wilson-fisher transition on fuzzy sphere bilayers, Phys. Rev. B 110, 115113 (2024)

    2024

  23. [31]

    J. L. Cardy, Universal amplitudes in finite-size scal- ing: generalisation to arbitrary dimensionality, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General18, L757 (1985)

    1985

  24. [32]

    Yang, Y.-G

    S. Yang, Y.-G. Yue, Y. Tang, C. Han, W. Zhu, and Y. Chen, Microscopic study of 3d potts phase transition via fuzzy sphere regularization, arXiv.2501.14320 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  25. [33]

    A. M. L¨ auchli, L. Herviou, P. H. Wilhelm, and S. Rychkov, Exact diagonalization, matrix product states and conformal perturbation theory study of a 3d ising fuzzy sphere model (2025), arXiv:2504.00842 [cond- mat.stat-mech]

    2025

  26. [34]

    J. E. Miro and O. Delouche, Flowing from the ising model on the fuzzy sphere to the 3d lee-yang cft (2025), arXiv:2505.07655 [hep-th]

    2025 arXiv

  27. [35]

    Voinea, R

    C. Voinea, R. Fan, N. Regnault, and Z. Papi´ c, Regular- izing 3d conformal field theories via anyons on the fuzzy sphere (2024), arXiv:2411.15299 [cond-mat.stat-mech]

    2024 arXiv

  28. [36]

    E. A. Cruz, I. R. Klebanov, G. Tarnopolsky, and Y. Xin, Yang-lee quantum criticality in various dimen- sions (2025), arXiv:2505.06369 [hep-th]

    2025

  29. [37]

    R. Fan, J. Dong, and A. Vishwanath, Simulating the non-unitary yang-lee conformal field theory on the fuzzy sphere (2025), arXiv:2505.06342 [cond-mat.str-el]

    2025 arXiv

  30. [38]

    Zhou and Y

    Z. Zhou and Y. Zou, Studying the 3d ising surface cfts on the fuzzy sphere, SciPost Physics 18, 31 (2025)

    2025

  31. [39]

    Hu, Y.-C

    L. Hu, Y.-C. He, and W. Zhu, Solving conformal defects in 3d conformal field theory using fuzzy sphere regular- ization, Nat. Commun. 15, 9013 (2024)

    2024

  32. [40]

    Fardelli, A

    G. Fardelli, A. L. Fitzpatrick, and E. Katz, Constructing the infrared conformal generators on the fuzzy sphere (2024), arXiv:2409.02998 [hep-th]

    2024 arXiv

  33. [41]

    Fan, Note on explicit construction of conformal gener- ators on the fuzzy sphere (2024), arXiv:2409.08257 [hep- th]

    R. Fan, Note on explicit construction of conformal gener- ators on the fuzzy sphere (2024), arXiv:2409.08257 [hep- th]

    2024 arXiv

  34. [42]

    L. Hu, Y. C. He, and W. Zhu, Entropic F-function of 3d Ising conformal field theory via the fuzzy sphere regularization, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2401.17362 (2024), arXiv:2401.17362 [cond-mat.str-el]

    2024 arXiv

  35. [43]

    C. Han, L. Hu, W. Zhu, and Y.-C. He, Conformal four- point correlators of the three-dimensional ising transition via the quantum fuzzy sphere, Phys. Rev. B 108, 235123 (2023). 6

    2023

  36. [44]

    avoided crossing

    to search the potential O(4) conformal fixed point: The optimal critical value is determined by the condition that scaling dimension of the energy-momentum tensor operator T µν is set to 3 and the scaling dimension cor- responding to the J µ-operator approaches 2 simultane- ou...

  37. [45]

    Z. Zhou, D. Gaiotto, Y.-C. He, and Y. Zou, The g- function and Defect Changing Operators from Wave- function Overlap on a Fuzzy Sphere, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2401.00039 (2023), arXiv:2401.00039 [hep-th]

    2023 arXiv

  38. [46]

    Z. Zhou, L. Hu, W. Zhu, and Y.-C. He, So(5) deconfined phase transition under the fuzzy-sphere microscope: Ap- proximate conformal symmetry, pseudo-criticality, and operator spectrum, Phys. Rev. X 14, 021044 (2024)

    2024

  39. [47]

    Zhou and Y.-C

    Z. Zhou and Y.-C. He, A new series of 3d cfts with Sp( n) global symmetry on fuzzy sphere (2024), arXiv:2410.00087 [hep-th]

    2024 arXiv

  40. [48]

    Gorbenko, S

    V. Gorbenko, S. Rychkov, and B. Zan, Walking, weak first-order transitions, and complex cfts, Journal of High Energy Physics 2018, 10.1007/jhep10(2018)108 (2018)

    2018 doi

  41. [49]

    Gorbenko, S

    V. Gorbenko, S. Rychkov, and B. Zan, Walking, Weak first-order transitions, and Complex CFTs II. Two- dimensional Potts model at Q >4, SciPost Phys. 5, 050 (2018)

    2018

  42. [50]

    D. B. Kaplan, J.-W. Lee, D. T. Son, and M. A. Stephanov, Conformality lost, Phys. Rev. D 80, 125005 (2009)

    2009

  43. [51]

    S. M. Chester and N. Su, Bootstrapping deconfined quan- tum tricriticality, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 111601 (2024)

    2024

  44. [52]

    Takahashi, H

    J. Takahashi, H. Shao, B. Zhao, W. Guo, and A. W. Sandvik, So(5) multicriticality in two-dimensional quan- tum magnets (2024), arXiv:2405.06607 [cond-mat.str-el]

    2024 arXiv

  45. [53]

    C.-M. Jian, A. Rasmussen, Y.-Z. You, and C. Xu, Emer- gent symmetry and tricritical points near the deconfined quantum critical point (2017), arXiv:1708.03050 [cond- mat.str-el]

    2017 arXiv

  46. [54]

    D.-C. Lu, C. Xu, and Y.-Z. You, Self-duality protected multicriticality in deconfined quantum phase transitions, Phys. Rev. B 104, 205142 (2021)

    2021

  47. [55]

    Ippoliti, R

    M. Ippoliti, R. S. K. Mong, F. F. Assaad, and M. P. Zaletel, Half-filled landau levels: A continuum and sign- free regularization for three-dimensional quantum critical points, Phys. Rev. B 98, 235108 (2018)

    2018

  48. [56]

    Z. Wang, M. P. Zaletel, R. S. K. Mong, and F. F. As- saad, Phases of the (2 + 1) dimensional so(5) nonlinear sigma model with topological term, Phys. Rev. Lett.126, 045701 (2021)

    2021

  49. [57]

    Tanaka and X

    A. Tanaka and X. Hu, Many-body spin berry phases emerging from the π-flux state: Competition between an- tiferromagnetism and the valence-bond-solid state, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 036402 (2005)

    2005

  50. [58]

    Lee and S

    J. Lee and S. Sachdev, Wess-zumino-witten terms in graphene landau levels, Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 226801 (2015)

    2015

  51. [59]

    Ma and C

    R. Ma and C. Wang, Theory of deconfined pseudocriti- cality, Phys. Rev. B 102, 020407 (2020)

    2020

  52. [60]

    Nahum, Note on Wess-Zumino-Witten models and quasiuniversality in 2 + 1 dimensions, Phys

    A. Nahum, Note on Wess-Zumino-Witten models and quasiuniversality in 2 + 1 dimensions, Phys. Rev. B 102, 201116 (2020)

    2020

  53. [61]

    D’Emidio and R

    J. D’Emidio and R. K. Kaul, New easy-plane CpN −1 fixed points, Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 187202 (2017)

    2017

  54. [62]

    Supplementary material

  55. [63]

    Zhou, Fuzzified – julia package for numerics on the fuzzy sphere (2025), arXiv:2503.00100 [cond-mat.str-el]

    Z. Zhou, Fuzzified – julia package for numerics on the fuzzy sphere (2025), arXiv:2503.00100 [cond-mat.str-el]

    2025

  56. [64]

    Hasebe, so(5) landau model and 4d quantum hall ef- fect in the so(4) monopole background, Phys

    K. Hasebe, so(5) landau model and 4d quantum hall ef- fect in the so(4) monopole background, Phys. Rev. D 105, 065010 (2022)

    2022

  57. [65]

    Henriksson, The critical o(n) cft: Methods and con- formal data, Physics Reports 1002, 1 (2023), the critical O(N) CFT: Methods and conformal data

    J. Henriksson, The critical o(n) cft: Methods and con- formal data, Physics Reports 1002, 1 (2023), the critical O(N) CFT: Methods and conformal data

    2023

  58. [66]

    Poland, S

    D. Poland, S. Rychkov, and A. Vichi, The conformal bootstrap: Theory, numerical techniques, and applica- tions, Rev. Mod. Phys. 91, 015002 (2019). 7 Supplemental Material This Supplemental Material includes: 1) The analysis of branching rules from SO(5) to SO(4) groups(Sec I)....

    2019

  59. [67]

    Here, we only listed the sectors with 0 ≤ sz 2 ≤ sz

    sectors. Here, we only listed the sectors with 0 ≤ sz 2 ≤ sz

  60. [68]

    The single number 1 , 2, 3 · · ·means sectors (±sz 1, ±sz

  61. [69]

    should have the same degeneracy 1 , 2, 3 · · ·, and the subscript 2 in 1 2, 22, 32 · · ·means the sectors ( ±sz 1, ±sz

  62. [70]

    should have the same degeneracy 1 , 2, 3 · · ·. Rep. dim Degeneracy in sector ( sz 1, sz 2) [s1, s2] (0, 0) (1 , 0) (1 , 1) (2 , 0) (2 , 1) (2 , 2) (3 , 0) (3 , 1) (3 , 2) (3 , 3) · · · [0, 0] 1 1 · · · [1, 0] 6 2 1 2 · · · [1, 1] 9 1 1 2 1 · · · [2, 0] 10 2 1 2 12 · · · [2, 1...

  63. [71]

    The SO(5) order parameter ϕ[1,1]5 ∼ (n1, n2, n3, n4, n5) transforms under the representation [1 , 1]5 and has five components. When the symmetry is broken from SO(5) to O(4), this primary field splits into two distinct fields, 9 ϕ[ 1 2 , 1 2 ]4 ∼ (n1, n2, n3, n4) and ϕ− [0,0]4...

  64. [72]

    The SO(5) rank-2 tensor Tab ∼ nanb − δabn2/5 (where a, b= 1 , 2, 3, 4, 5) is the field that governs the Neel- VBS phase transition and has 14 independent components. When the symmetry is broken to O(4), Tab splits into three fields: ( T[1,1]4 )ab ∼ nanb − δabn2/4 (where a, b= ...

  65. [73]

    In SO(5), the 6 π-monopole operator M6π is a rank-3 tensor in the [3 , 3]5 representation. In SO(4) theory, it splits into four distinct operators: a) the 6 π-monopole operator M6π [3/2,3/2]4 , b) a parity-odd operator M− 6π [1,1]4 sharing the same representation as ( T[1,1]4 ...

  66. [74]

    E S ?[0] ?[1] 0 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25 0.3 0.35 0.4 0.45 1=pNo -1 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7

    +rznz 1nz 2], let rz = 1 + 2∆z 3 (S18) Thus, the symmetry of the model HO(2) = HO(3) + Hzz can be reduced from O(3) to O(2) by tuning parameter rz. Fig. S4 shows the evolution of excitation gaps as a function of rz. When rz = 1, the model hosts O(3)-Heisenberg phase transition...

  67. [75]

    1 − [0] 2.0694 2 .0854 2 .1069 2 .1186 1.4 1.51136 S 0 + [0] 1.5609 1 .5675 1 .5472 1 .5103 2.8 - H m

  68. [76]

    1 + [2] 3.0410 3 .0364 3 .0384 3 .0242 3 3 T µν 2 + [0] 3.000 3 .000 3 .000 3 .000 2.1 2.1086 t3

  69. [77]

    0 − [3] 2.1216 2 .1320 2 .1461 2 .1476 3.2 3.111535 t4

  70. [78]

    0 + [4] 3.1347 3 .1478 3 .1662 3 .1650 5.7 − ϕ′ 0 − [1] 4.2746 4 .2629 4 .2493 4 .1913

    1913

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.