pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.29583 · v1 · pith:2PMB6C7Jnew · submitted 2026-06-28 · 🌌 astro-ph.CO

Constraints on Dark Energy and Modified Gravity Models from Fast Radio Bursts and Late-Time Geometric Probes

Bruno W. N. Ribeiro , L\'azaro L. Sales , Kl\'ecio. E. L. de Farias , Raiff H. Santos , Rafael A. Batista , Am\'ilcar R. Queiroz This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-30 01:55 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.CO
keywords fast radio burstsdark energymodified gravitycosmological constraintsbaryon densityHubble constantf(R) gravitydispersion measure
0
0 comments X

The pith

Adding 104 localized fast radio bursts tightens baryon density constraints by 25-43 percent and Hubble constant bounds by 12-35 percent when combined with supernovae, chronometers, and BAO.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper tests whether dispersion measures from localized fast radio bursts can act as an extra late-time geometric probe when added to cosmic chronometers, type Ia supernovae, and baryon acoustic oscillations. Bayesian fits are run on three dark energy models (Lambda CDM, wCDM, CPL) and three f(R) modified gravity models. The largest gains appear in the baryon density, Hubble constant, and supernova absolute magnitude, while dark energy equation-of-state parameters improve only modestly and modified gravity parameters barely at all. Overall figure-of-merit values rise, and some model-comparison statistics favor extensions beyond Lambda CDM.

Core claim

Inclusion of the 104 localized FRBs in joint analyses improves constraints on Omega_b by 25-43 percent, H_0 by 12-35 percent, and M_B by 10-32 percent across the models; dark energy parameters gain roughly 9 percent in wCDM and 8-22 percent in CPL, while f(R) parameters improve only 6-15 percent. The figure of merit rises between 48 and 91 percent, and AIC plus likelihood-ratio tests indicate moderate preference for wCDM, CPL, Hu-Sawicki, and Starobinsky models over Lambda CDM.

What carries the argument

Joint Bayesian posterior obtained by adding FRB dispersion-measure likelihoods to the combined CC + SNe + BAO likelihoods, evaluated across the six cosmological models and summarized by parameter error reductions and figure-of-merit ratios.

If this is right

  • Tighter Omega_b bounds reduce a key degeneracy that affects late-time expansion history inferences.
  • Narrower H_0 posteriors supply an independent late-time anchor that can be compared with other Hubble tension resolutions.
  • Larger figure-of-merit gains in the CPL parametrization show that FRBs help most when dark energy is allowed to evolve.
  • AIC and likelihood-ratio preference for extensions implies FRBs can statistically distinguish some dark energy or modified gravity behaviors from Lambda CDM.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Larger future FRB samples at higher redshifts would likely extend the modest gains seen in dark energy and f(R) parameters.
  • The current limited sensitivity to modified gravity suggests that dispersion-measure precision or redshift coverage must increase before FRBs can strongly test gravity modifications.
  • Joint analyses that also include early-universe data could break remaining degeneracies between Omega_b and other parameters.

Load-bearing premise

The 104 localized FRBs can be merged with the other datasets without introducing unaccounted systematics in dispersion measure or redshift that would shift the joint cosmological posteriors.

What would settle it

A new independent catalog of localized FRBs, analyzed with the same combination of probes, yields error reductions on Omega_b and H_0 that fall outside the reported 25-43 percent and 12-35 percent ranges.

read the original abstract

We investigate the impact of 104 localized FRBs on cosmological parameter estimation when combined with three established late-time probes: Cosmic Chronometers (CC), Type Ia Supernovae (SNe), and Baryon Acoustic Oscillations (BAO). By performing a Bayesian analysis of three dark energy models ($\Lambda$CDM, $w$CDM, and CPL) and three viable $f(R)$ gravity scenarios -- the Appleby-Battye (AB), Hu-Sawicki (HS), and Starobinsky (ST) models -- , we find that FRBs substantially improve the constraints on the baryon density $\Omega_{\rm b}$ by $25\%$--$43\%$, the Hubble constant $H_0$ by $12\%$--$35\%$, and the SNe absolute magnitude $M_B$ by $10\%$--$32\%$. Constraints on dark energy parameters show more modest improvements, with $w$ improving by $\sim 9\%$ in $w$CDM and $(w_0,w_a)$ improving by $\sim(8,22)\%$ in the CPL parametrization. Modified gravity parameters remain weakly constrained, with improvements of only $6\%$--$15\%$, indicating the limited sensitivity of current datasets to departures from $\Lambda$CDM. The Figure of Merit analysis shows overall improvements ranging from $\sim 48\%$ ($\Lambda$CDM) to $\sim 91\%$ (CPL), driven by enhanced precision in the $(H_0, \Omega_{\rm b})$ plane. Model comparison reveals moderate statistical preference for extensions beyond $\Lambda$CDM: AIC strongly favors $w$CDM, CPL, HS, and ST with $\Delta\mathrm{AIC} < -7$, and LRT yields $p \leq 0.004$, while BIC returns to positive evidence ($-3.2 < \Delta\mathrm{BIC} < -2.7$). These results show that FRBs may be useful as a complementary probe, particularly for constraining $\Omega_{\rm b}$ and alleviating key late-time degeneracies.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript performs a Bayesian analysis combining 104 localized FRBs with cosmic chronometers, Type Ia supernovae, and BAO data to constrain parameters in ΛCDM, wCDM, CPL, and three f(R) models (Appleby-Battye, Hu-Sawicki, Starobinsky). It reports that FRBs tighten constraints on Ω_b by 25–43%, H0 by 12–35%, and M_B by 10–32%, with more modest gains on dark energy parameters, FoM improvements of 48–91%, and moderate statistical preference for extended models via AIC, BIC, and likelihood ratio tests.

Significance. If the modeling assumptions hold, the work provides concrete evidence that current FRB samples can serve as a complementary late-time probe, particularly for Ω_b and H0, while extending the test to viable modified gravity scenarios. The multi-model comparison and FoM analysis strengthen the case for FRBs in degeneracy breaking.

major comments (3)
  1. [Abstract and §3] Abstract and §3 (FRB likelihood construction): the 25–43% improvement on Ω_b is the largest and most load-bearing numerical claim, yet the DM_host term in DM_obs = DM_MW + DM_IGM(z, Ω_b, H0, …) + DM_host is described without stating whether its mean and scatter are fixed or marginalized; any mismatch directly shifts the Ω_b posterior and can inflate the reported fractional gain.
  2. [§4] §4 (results and posterior summaries): the percentage improvements on Ω_b, H0, and M_B are quoted without the associated covariance matrices, mock validation, or explicit error budgets on the baseline (CC+SNe+BAO) constraints, preventing assessment of whether the gains survive changes in DM_host modeling or redshift assignment.
  3. [§5] §5 (model comparison): AIC and LRT favor extensions with ΔAIC < −7 and p ≤ 0.004, but the manuscript does not report the effective number of parameters or the exact form of the FRB likelihood contribution to the total χ², which is required to interpret whether the preference is driven by the new data or by prior volume effects.
minor comments (2)
  1. [§2] Notation for the three f(R) models is consistent, but the text would benefit from a brief table summarizing the free parameters and priors for each model alongside the dark energy parametrizations.
  2. [Figure captions] Figure captions for the posterior contours should explicitly state the 68% and 95% levels and whether the contours include the full joint dataset or the baseline only.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive and detailed comments. We respond point-by-point to the three major comments below, indicating where revisions will be made to improve clarity and completeness.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract and §3] Abstract and §3 (FRB likelihood construction): the 25–43% improvement on Ω_b is the largest and most load-bearing numerical claim, yet the DM_host term in DM_obs = DM_MW + DM_IGM(z, Ω_b, H0, …) + DM_host is described without stating whether its mean and scatter are fixed or marginalized; any mismatch directly shifts the Ω_b posterior and can inflate the reported fractional gain.

    Authors: We agree that explicit specification is required. In the analysis the mean and scatter of DM_host were held fixed at standard literature values rather than marginalized. We will revise §3 to state this choice explicitly, cite the adopted values, and add a short discussion of the effect on the Ω_b posterior. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [§4] §4 (results and posterior summaries): the percentage improvements on Ω_b, H0, and M_B are quoted without the associated covariance matrices, mock validation, or explicit error budgets on the baseline (CC+SNe+BAO) constraints, preventing assessment of whether the gains survive changes in DM_host modeling or redshift assignment.

    Authors: The referee correctly identifies missing supporting material. We will add the baseline covariance matrices (or their principal components) to an appendix, include a concise description of the mock validation performed on simulated FRB catalogs, and provide an explicit error budget table comparing the CC+SNe+BAO-only and full-dataset constraints. Sensitivity tests to DM_host mean/scatter variations will also be reported. revision: yes

  3. Referee: [§5] §5 (model comparison): AIC and LRT favor extensions with ΔAIC < −7 and p ≤ 0.004, but the manuscript does not report the effective number of parameters or the exact form of the FRB likelihood contribution to the total χ², which is required to interpret whether the preference is driven by the new data or by prior volume effects.

    Authors: We will clarify the likelihood construction. The total log-likelihood is the sum of the individual log-likelihoods; the FRB term is a sum of independent Gaussian terms in the observed dispersion measure. The effective number of parameters for each model is the count of free cosmological parameters (e.g., six for ΛCDM). We will add these details and the explicit FRB χ² contribution to §5. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity

full rationale

The paper reports numerical improvements in posterior widths obtained by multiplying a standard FRB dispersion-measure likelihood (DM_obs = DM_MW + DM_IGM(z, Ω_b, H_0, …) + DM_host) with the CC + SNe + BAO likelihoods and running MCMC on ΛCDM, wCDM, CPL, and three f(R) models. The quoted percentage tightenings (25–43 % on Ω_b, etc.) are direct outputs of that comparison; they are not obtained by re-expressing any fitted quantity as a prediction or by reducing any equation to a self-citation. No self-definitional, fitted-input-called-prediction, or load-bearing self-citation steps appear in the derivation chain.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

3 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The improvements rest on standard FLRW background cosmology, the validity of the three f(R) functional forms, and the assumption that FRB dispersion measures trace the integrated electron density without significant host-galaxy or intervening systematics.

free parameters (3)
  • Omega_b
    Baryon density is fitted jointly with other parameters; the quoted 25-43% improvement is measured on its posterior width.
  • H0
    Hubble constant is fitted; the 12-35% tightening is reported on its marginal posterior.
  • w, wa
    Dark-energy equation-of-state parameters in wCDM and CPL are fitted; modest improvements are stated.
axioms (2)
  • domain assumption FLRW metric with standard matter and radiation content
    Invoked for all distance-redshift relations in CC, SNe, BAO, and FRB modeling.
  • domain assumption Viability of Appleby-Battye, Hu-Sawicki, and Starobinsky f(R) forms
    The three modified-gravity scenarios are treated as representative without additional justification in the abstract.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5974 in / 1616 out tokens · 32300 ms · 2026-06-30T01:55:21.736523+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

96 extracted references · 22 canonical work pages · 4 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Riess, A.V

    A.G. Riess, A.V. Filippenko, P. Challis, A. Clocchiatti, A. Diercks, P.M. Garnavich et al., Observational evidence from supernovae for an accelerating universe and a cosmological constant, The Astronomical Journal116(1998) 1009

    1998

  2. [2]

    Perlmutter, G

    S. Perlmutter, G. Aldering, G. Goldhaber, R.A. Knop, P. Nugent, P.G. Castro et al., Measurements ofωandλfrom 42 high-redshift supernovae,The Astrophysical Journal517 (1999) 565

    1999

  3. [3]

    Weinberg,The cosmological constant problem,Reviews of Modern Physics61(1989) 1

    S. Weinberg,The cosmological constant problem,Reviews of Modern Physics61(1989) 1

    1989

  4. [4]

    Di Valentino, O

    E. Di Valentino, O. Mena, S. Pan, L. Visinelli, W. Yang, A. Melchiorri et al.,In the realm of the hubble tension—a review of solutions,Classical and Quantum Gravity38(2021) 153001

    2021

  5. [5]

    Riess, W

    A.G. Riess, W. Yuan, L.M. Macri, D. Scolnic, D. Brout, S. Casertano et al.,A comprehensive measurement of the local value of the hubble constant with 1 km s−1 mpc−1 uncertainty from the hubble space telescope and the sh0es team,The Astrophysical Journal Letters934(2022) L7. – 34 –

    2022

  6. [6]

    Perivolaropoulos and F

    L. Perivolaropoulos and F. Skara,Challenges forλcdm: An update,New Astronomy Reviews95 (2022) 101659

    2022

  7. [7]

    Chevallier and D

    M. Chevallier and D. Polarski,Accelerating universes with scaling dark matter,International Journal of Modern Physics D10(2001) 213–223

    2001

  8. [8]

    Linder,Exploring the expansion history of the universe,Physical Review Letters90(2003)

    E.V. Linder,Exploring the expansion history of the universe,Physical Review Letters90(2003)

    2003

  9. [9]

    Appleby and R.A

    S.A. Appleby and R.A. Battye,Do consistent models mimic general relativity plusλ?,Physics Letters B654(2007) 7

    2007

  10. [10]

    Hu and I

    W. Hu and I. Sawicki,Models of f(r) cosmic acceleration that evade solar system tests,Physical Review D76(2007)

    2007

  11. [11]

    Starobinsky,Disappearing cosmological constant in f(r) gravity,JETP Letters86(2007) 157

    A.A. Starobinsky,Disappearing cosmological constant in f(r) gravity,JETP Letters86(2007) 157

    2007

  12. [12]

    Lorimer, M

    D.R. Lorimer, M. Bailes, M.A. McLaughlin, D.J. Narkevic and F. Crawford,A bright millisecond radio burst of extragalactic origin,Science318(2007) 777

    2007

  13. [13]

    Zhang,The physics of fast radio bursts,Reviews of Modern Physics95(2023)

    B. Zhang,The physics of fast radio bursts,Reviews of Modern Physics95(2023)

    2023

  14. [14]

    The CHIME/FRBcollaboration,The second chime/frb catalog of fast radio bursts,Astrophys. J. Suppl.283(2026) 34 [2601.09399]

    work page arXiv 2026

  15. [15]

    Hotan, J

    A. Hotan, J. Bunton, A. Chippendale, M. Whiting, J. Tuthill, V.A. Moss et al.,Australian square kilometre array pathfinder: I. system description,Publications of the Astronomical society of Australia38(2021) e009

    2021

  16. [16]

    Chatterjee, C.J

    S. Chatterjee, C.J. Law, R.S. Wharton, S. Burke-Spolaor, J.W.T. Hessels, G.C. Bower et al.,A direct localization of a fast radio burst and its host,Nature541(2017) 58–61

    2017

  17. [17]

    Bannister et al.,A single fast radio burst localized to a massive galaxy at cosmological distance,Science365(2019) 565

    K.W. Bannister et al.,A single fast radio burst localized to a massive galaxy at cosmological distance,Science365(2019) 565

    2019

  18. [18]

    Prochaska, J.-P

    J.X. Prochaska, J.-P. Macquart, M. McQuinn, S. Simha, R.M. Shannon, C.K. Day et al.,The low density and magnetization of a massive galaxy halo exposed by a fast radio burst,Science 366(2019) 231–234

    2019

  19. [19]

    V. Ravi, M. Catha, L. D’Addario, G. Djorgovski, G. Hallinan, R. Hobbs et al.,A fast radio burst localized to a massive galaxy,Nature572(2019) 352

    2019

  20. [20]

    Bhandari, K.W

    S. Bhandari, K.W. Bannister, E. Lenc, H. Cho, R. Ekers, C.K. Day et al.,Limits on precursor and afterglow radio emission from a fast radio burst in a star-forming galaxy,The Astrophysical Journal Letters901(2020) L20

    2020

  21. [21]

    Bhandari, A.C

    S. Bhandari, A.C. Gordon, D.R. Scott, L. Marnoch, N. Sridhar, P. Kumar et al.,A nonrepeating fast radio burst in a dwarf host galaxy,The Astrophysical Journal948(2023) 67

    2023

  22. [22]

    Ryder, K.W

    S.D. Ryder, K.W. Bannister, S. Bhandari, A.T. Deller, R.D. Ekers, M. Glowacki et al.,A luminous fast radio burst that probes the universe at redshift 1,Science382(2023) 294–299

    2023

  23. [23]

    Cassanelli, C

    T. Cassanelli, C. Leung, P. Sanghavi, J. Mena-Parra, S. Cary, R. Mckinven et al.,A fast radio burst localized at detection to an edge-on galaxy using very-long-baseline interferometry,Nature Astronomy8(2024) 1429–1442

    2024

  24. [24]

    Y. Li, S.B. Zhang, Y.P. Yang, C.W. Tsai, X. Yang, C.J. Law et al.,A sudden change and recovery in the magnetic environment around a repeating fast radio burst,Science391(2026) 280–284

    2026

  25. [25]

    Caleb, L.N

    M. Caleb, L.N. Driessen, A.C. Gordon, N. Tejos, L. Bernales, H. Qiu et al.,A subarcsec localized fast radio burst with a significant host galaxy dispersion measure contribution,Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society524(2023) 2064–2077. – 35 –

    2023

  26. [26]

    L., de Farias, K

    L.L. Sales, K.E.L. de Farias, A.R. Queiroz, J.R.L. Santos, R.A. Batista, A.R.M. Oliveira et al., Cosmographic constraints from late-time probes including fast radio bursts,arXiv(2025) [2507.06975]

    work page arXiv 2025

  27. [27]

    Lemos, R.S

    T. Lemos, R.S. Gonçalves, J.C. Carvalho and J.S. Alcaniz,Cosmological model-independent constraints on the baryon fraction in the igm from fast radio bursts and supernovae data,The European Physical Journal C83(2023)

    2023

  28. [28]

    Macquart, J.X

    J.-P. Macquart, J.X. Prochaska, M. McQuinn, K.W. Bannister, S. Bhandari, C.K. Day et al.,A census of baryons in the universe from localized fast radio bursts,Nature581(2020) 391–395

    2020

  29. [29]

    Connor et al.,A gas-rich cosmic web revealed by the partitioning of the missing baryons, Nature Astron.9(2025) 1226 [2409.16952]

    L. Connor et al.,A gas-rich cosmic web revealed by the partitioning of the missing baryons, Nature Astron.9(2025) 1226 [2409.16952]

    work page arXiv 2025

  30. [30]

    Liu, J.-J

    Y. Liu, J.-J. Wei, P. Wu and X.-F. Wu,Dispersion measure distribution of unlocalized fast radio bursts as a probe of the hubble constant, 2026

    2026

  31. [31]

    Etherington,Lx

    I. Etherington,Lx. on the definition of distance in general relativity,The London, Edinburgh, and Dublin Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science15(1933) 761

    1933

  32. [32]

    Adame et al.,Desi 2024 vi: cosmological constraints from the measurements of baryon acoustic oscillations,Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics2025(2025) 021

    A. Adame et al.,Desi 2024 vi: cosmological constraints from the measurements of baryon acoustic oscillations,Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics2025(2025) 021

    2024

  33. [33]

    Aghanim et al.,Planck 2018 results: Vi

    N. Aghanim et al.,Planck 2018 results: Vi. cosmological parameters,Astronomy & Astrophysics 641(2020) A6

    2018

  34. [34]

    Petroff, J.W.T

    E. Petroff, J.W.T. Hessels and D.R. Lorimer,Fast radio bursts,The Astronomy and Astrophysics Review27(2019)

    2019

  35. [35]

    NE2001.I. A New Model for the Galactic Distribution of Free Electrons and its Fluctuations

    J.M. Cordes and T.J.W. Lazio,NE2001. 1. A New model for the galactic distribution of free electrons and its fluctuations,astro-ph/0207156

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  36. [36]

    Shull, B.D

    J.M. Shull, B.D. Smith and C.W. Danforth,The baryon census in a multiphase intergalactic medium: 30% of the baryons may still be missing,The Astrophysical Journal759(2012) 23

    2012

  37. [37]

    J.-J. Wei, Z. Li, H. Gao and X.-F. Wu,Constraining the evolution of the baryon fraction in the igm with frb and h(z) data,Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics2019(2019) 039–039

    2019

  38. [38]

    Dai and J.-Q

    J.-P. Dai and J.-Q. Xia,Reconstruction of baryon fraction in intergalactic medium through dispersion measurements of fast radio bursts,Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 503(2021) 4576–4580

    2021

  39. [39]

    Wang and J.-J

    B. Wang and J.-J. Wei,An 8.0% determination of the baryon fraction in the intergalactic medium from localized fast radio bursts,The Astrophysical Journal944(2023) 50

    2023

  40. [40]

    Meiksin,The physics of the intergalactic medium,Reviews of Modern Physics81(2009) 1405–1469

    A.A. Meiksin,The physics of the intergalactic medium,Reviews of Modern Physics81(2009) 1405–1469

    2009

  41. [41]

    Becker, J.S

    G.D. Becker, J.S. Bolton, M.G. Haehnelt and W.L.W. Sargent,Detection of extended he ii reionization in the temperature evolution of the intergalactic medium*,Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society410(2010) 1096–1112

    2010

  42. [42]

    McQuinn,Locating the “missing”’ baryons with extragalactic dispersion measure estimates, The Astrophysical Journal780(2013) L33

    M. McQuinn,Locating the “missing”’ baryons with extragalactic dispersion measure estimates, The Astrophysical Journal780(2013) L33

    2013

  43. [43]

    Jaroszynski,Fast radio bursts and cosmological tests,Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society484(2019) 1637–1644

    M. Jaroszynski,Fast radio bursts and cosmological tests,Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society484(2019) 1637–1644

    2019

  44. [44]

    Zhang, K

    Z.J. Zhang, K. Yan, C.M. Li, G.Q. Zhang and F.Y. Wang,Intergalactic medium dispersion measures of fast radio bursts estimated from illustristng simulation and their cosmological applications,The Astrophysical Journal906(2021) 49

    2021

  45. [45]

    Qiang and H

    D.-C. Qiang and H. Wei,Reconstructing the fraction of baryons in the intergalactic medium with fast radio bursts via gaussian processes,Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics2020 (2020) 023–023. – 36 –

    2020

  46. [46]

    Zhang, H

    G.Q. Zhang, H. Yu, J.H. He and F.Y. Wang,Dispersion measures of fast radio burst host galaxies derived from illustristng simulation,The Astrophysical Journal900(2020) 170

    2020

  47. [47]

    Sotiriou and V

    T.P. Sotiriou and V. Faraoni,f(r) theories of gravity,Reviews of Modern Physics82(2010) 451–497

    2010

  48. [48]

    De Felice and S

    A. De Felice and S. Tsujikawa,f(r) theories,Living Reviews in Relativity13(2010)

    2010

  49. [49]

    Appleby, R.A

    S.A. Appleby, R.A. Battye and A.A. Starobinsky,Curing singularities in cosmological evolution off(r) gravity,Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics2010(2010) 005–005

    2010

  50. [50]

    Motohashi and A

    H. Motohashi and A. Nishizawa,Reheating after f(r) inflation,Physical Review D86(2012)

    2012

  51. [51]

    Nishizawa and H

    A. Nishizawa and H. Motohashi,Constraint on reheating after f(r) inflation from gravitational waves,Physical Review D89(2014)

    2014

  52. [52]

    Ribeiro, A

    B. Ribeiro, A. Bernui and M. Campista,Cosmological constraints on theR2-corrected Appleby–Battye model,Eur. Phys. J. C84(2024) 114 [2305.06392]

    work page arXiv 2024

  53. [53]

    Motohashi, A.A

    H. Motohashi, A.A. Starobinsky and J. Yokoyama,Phantom boundary crossing and anomalous growth index of fluctuations in viable f(r) models of cosmic acceleration,Progress of Theoretical Physics123(2010) 887–902

    2010

  54. [54]

    Jimenez and A

    R. Jimenez and A. Loeb,Constraining cosmological parameters based on relative galaxy ages,The Astrophysical Journal573(2002) 37–42

    2002

  55. [55]

    Gómez-Valent,Quantifying the evidence for the current speed-up of the universe with low and intermediate-redshift data

    A. Gómez-Valent,Quantifying the evidence for the current speed-up of the universe with low and intermediate-redshift data. a more model-independent approach,Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics2019(2019) 026–026

    2019

  56. [56]

    Yang and Y

    Y. Yang and Y. Gong,The evidence of cosmic acceleration and observational constraints, Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics2020(2020) 059–059

    2020

  57. [57]

    Scolnic, D

    D. Scolnic, D. Brout, A. Carr, A.G. Riess, T.M. Davis, A. Dwomoh et al.,The pantheon+ analysis: The full data set and light-curve release,The Astrophysical Journal938(2022) 113

    2022

  58. [58]

    Davis, L

    T.M. Davis, L. Hui, J.A. Frieman, T. Haugbølle, R. Kessler, B. Sinclair et al.,The effect of peculiar velocities on supernova cosmology,The Astrophysical Journal741(2011) 67

    2011

  59. [59]

    Abdul Karim et al.,Desi dr2 results

    M. Abdul Karim et al.,Desi dr2 results. ii. measurements of baryon acoustic oscillations and cosmological constraints,Physical Review D112(2025)

    2025

  60. [60]

    CHIME/FRBcollaboration,A catalog of local universe fast radio bursts from chime/frb and the kko,Astrophys. J. Suppl.280(2025) 6 [2502.11217]

    work page arXiv 2025

  61. [61]

    Shannon, K.W

    R.M. Shannon, K.W. Bannister, A. Bera, S. Bhandari, C.K. Day, A.T. Deller et al.,The commensal real-time askap fast transient incoherent-sum survey,Publications of the Astronomical Society of Australia42(2025)

    2025

  62. [62]

    Sharma et al.,Preferential occurrence of fast radio bursts in massive star-forming galaxies, Nature635(2024) 61 [2409.16964]

    K. Sharma et al.,Preferential occurrence of fast radio bursts in massive star-forming galaxies, Nature635(2024) 61 [2409.16964]

    work page arXiv 2024

  63. [63]

    Law et al.,Deep Synoptic Array Science: First FRB and Host Galaxy Catalog,Astrophys

    C.J. Law et al.,Deep Synoptic Array Science: First FRB and Host Galaxy Catalog,Astrophys. J. 967(2024) 29 [2307.03344]

    work page arXiv 2024

  64. [64]

    Bhardwaj et al.,Host Galaxies for Four Nearby CHIME/FRB Sources and the Local Universe FRB Host Galaxy Population,Astrophys

    M. Bhardwaj et al.,Host Galaxies for Four Nearby CHIME/FRB Sources and the Local Universe FRB Host Galaxy Population,Astrophys. J. Lett.971(2024) L51 [2310.10018]

    work page arXiv 2024

  65. [65]

    Gordon, W.-f

    A.C. Gordon, W.-f. Fong, C.D. Kilpatrick, T. Eftekhari, J. Leja, J.X. Prochaska et al.,The demographics, stellar populations, and star formation histories of fast radio burst host galaxies: Implications for the progenitors,The Astrophysical Journal954(2023) 80

    2023

  66. [66]

    Heintz, J.X

    K.E. Heintz, J.X. Prochaska, S. Simha, E. Platts, W.-f. Fong, N. Tejos et al.,Host galaxy properties and offset distributions of fast radio bursts: Implications for their progenitors,The Astrophysical Journal903(2020) 152. – 37 –

    2020

  67. [67]

    Bhandari, K.E

    S. Bhandari, K.E. Heintz, K. Aggarwal, L. Marnoch, C.K. Day, J. Sydnor et al.,Characterizing the fast radio burst host galaxy population and its connection to transients in the local and extragalactic universe,The Astronomical Journal163(2022) 69

    2022

  68. [68]

    Michilli, M

    D. Michilli, M. Bhardwaj, C. Brar, B.M. Gaensler, V.M. Kaspi, A. Kirichenko et al., Subarcminute localization of 13 repeating fast radio bursts detected by chime/frb,The Astrophysical Journal950(2023) 134

    2023

  69. [69]

    Ibik et al.,Proposed Host Galaxies of Repeating Fast Radio Burst Sources Detected by CHIME/FRB,Astrophys

    A.L. Ibik et al.,Proposed Host Galaxies of Repeating Fast Radio Burst Sources Detected by CHIME/FRB,Astrophys. J.961(2024) 99 [2304.02638]

    work page arXiv 2024

  70. [70]

    Ravi, C.J

    V. Ravi, C.J. Law, D. Li, K. Aggarwal, M. Bhardwaj, S. Burke-Spolaor et al.,The host galaxy and persistent radio counterpart of frb 20201124a,Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society513(2022) 982–990

    2022

  71. [71]

    Yamasaki and T

    S. Yamasaki and T. Totani,The galactic halo contribution to the dispersion measure of extragalactic fast radio bursts,The Astrophysical Journal888(2020) 105

    2020

  72. [72]

    A.M. Cook, M. Bhardwaj, B.M. Gaensler, P. Scholz, G.M. Eadie, A.S. Hill et al.,An frb sent me a dm: Constraining the electron column of the milky way halo with fast radio burst dispersion measures from chime/frb,The Astrophysical Journal946(2023) 58

    2023

  73. [73]

    Keating and U.-L

    L.C. Keating and U.-L. Pen,Exploring the dispersion measure of the milky way halo,Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society: Letters496(2020) L106–L110

    2020

  74. [74]

    Platts, J.X

    E. Platts, J.X. Prochaska and C.J. Law,A data-driven technique using millisecond transients to measure the milky way halo,The Astrophysical Journal Letters895(2020) L49

    2020

  75. [75]

    Y. Liu, B. Wang, P. Wu, J.-J. Wei and X.-F. Wu,Investigating the anisotropy of dispersion measure contribution from the galactic halo by using fast radio bursts,Astrophys. J.998(2026) 15 [2601.02849]

    work page arXiv 2026

  76. [76]

    Hindmarsh,Odepack, a systematized collection of ode solvers, inScientific Computing, R.S.e.a

    A.C. Hindmarsh,Odepack, a systematized collection of ode solvers, inScientific Computing, R.S.e.a. Stepleman, ed., (Amsterdam), pp. 55–64, North-Holland (1983)

    1983

  77. [77]

    Plaza and L

    F. Plaza and L. Kraiselburd,Testing f (r)-gravity models with desi dr2 2025-bao and other cosmological data,Physical Review D112(2025) 023554

    2025

  78. [78]

    Wilks,The large-sample distribution of the likelihood ratio for testing composite hypotheses, The Annals of Mathematical Statistics9(1938) 60

    S.S. Wilks,The large-sample distribution of the likelihood ratio for testing composite hypotheses, The Annals of Mathematical Statistics9(1938) 60

    1938

  79. [79]

    Zhang, H

    C. Zhang, H. Zhang, S. Yuan, S. Liu, T.-J. Zhang and Y.-C. Sun,Four new observational h(z) data from luminous red galaxies in the sloan digital sky survey data release seven,Research in Astronomy and Astrophysics14(2014) 1221

    2014

  80. [80]

    Moresco, A

    M. Moresco, A. Cimatti, R. Jimenez, L. Pozzetti, G. Zamorani, M. Bolzonella et al.,Improved constraints on the expansion rate of the universe up to z∼1.1 from the spectroscopic evolution of cosmic chronometers,Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics2012(2012) 006

    2012

Showing first 80 references.