Pith. sign in

REVIEW 5 major objections 6 minor 48 references

Collimation of dense atomic beams by Swept Velocity Shelving

T0 review · 5 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-03 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read A three-laser sequence called swept velocity shelving can narrow the transverse velocity spread of a dense atomic beam almost independently of density, reaching an effective Doppler width near 1 MHz where conventional optical molasses fails

desk verdict A genuinely new one-sided collimation scheme with a credible proof-of-principle experiment, but the headline density-independence claim is not yet experimentally supported. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.28873 v1 pith:2PW5BNCN submitted 2026-07-30 physics.atom-ph

Francesca Famà , Benedikt Heizenreder , Ananya Sitaram , Camila Beli , Robert J.C. Spreeuw , Stefan A. Schäffer , Florian Schreck This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.atom-ph
keywords sweptvelocityshelvingatomicbeamcollimationdensebeamsopticalmolasseslimitsselectioncavityQEDmetastablestrontium
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper introduces swept velocity shelving (SVS), a laser-based scheme to collimate a dense atomic beam in one transverse direction without relying on the balanced counter-propagating beams of optical molasses. A broadband sweep beam pushes the velocity distribution of ground-state atoms while a narrow selection beam excites only atoms within a chosen velocity class, and a shelving beam transfers those atoms into a long-lived metastable state, removing them from the light field. Because selected atoms stop interacting, the final velocity spread is set by the selection-beam bandwidth rather than by absorption-induced force imbalances, making the achievable spread nearly independent of atomic density. The authors support this with simulations for strontium and an experiment in a thermal strontium beam coupled to an optical cavity, reaching an effective Doppler width of about 2π×1 MHz and a transverse velocity spread of 0.7±0.1 m/s at a density where molasses would be absorption limited. If correct, the scheme offers a state-heralded, programmable, high-flux atomic beam for cavity QED, optical clocks, and atom interferometry.

What carries the argument

The central machinery is the SVS pulse sequence: a broadband one-sided sweep beam decelerates ground-state atoms; a narrow selection beam, power-broadened to a programmable width, excites atoms in the desired velocity class; and a shelving beam optically pumps those atoms into a long-lived metastable state, where they no longer scatter light. The selection bandwidth is fixed by the identity k_sel Δv_sel ≈ γ_sel √(1+s_sel) + 1/τ_sel, which ties the final velocity spread to the selection laser's power broadening and pulse duration. This identity, together with the removal of selected atoms from the optical cycle, is what decouples the final velocity width from atomic density and from the absor

What would settle it

Measure the velocity distribution of the shelved atoms directly—for example, by imaging the transverse spatial spread after a known free-flight distance with the sweeping beam off—and compare the inferred spread with γ_sw = k(γ_eff − γ_homo) from the cavity spectra; a spread above about 1 m/s under the stated selection conditions would falsify the subtraction-based claim.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that swept velocity shelving (SVS) collimates a dense atomic beam without the absorption-induced force imbalance that degrades optical molasses, and that the achievable velocity spread is nearly independent of atomic density. In SVS, a one-sided broadband sweep beam exerts radiation pressure on all ground-state atoms while a narrow selection beam, power-broadened to a controllable width, excites atoms in a chosen velocity class; a shelving beam then transfers these atoms to a long-lived metastable state. The experimental demonstration, using a thermal strontium beam and cavity normal-mode spectroscopy, reports an effective Doppler linewidth γ_sw ≃ 2π×1 MHz with n

Load-bearing premise

The reported velocity spread of 0.7 m/s rests on the assumption that the measured cavity linewidth is the Lorentzian sum of a known homogeneous broadening (dominated by transit-time broadening, estimated at about 2π×0.35 MHz) and the Doppler width of the selected velocity class; if the homogeneous estimate is too low or the selection lineshape is not actually Lorentzian, the spread is larger than claimed.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • In dense beams where molasses becomes absorption-limited, SVS keeps the velocity spread set by the selection transition's power-broadened width, so atomic flux can be raised without degrading collimation.
  • The final velocity class is state-heralded and programmable: its mean velocity is set by the selection detuning and its width by the selection power and pulse duration.
  • Atoms scatter only the photons needed to reach the selection window before being shelved, removing the photon-budget bottleneck of molasses and reducing laser power requirements at high flux.
  • The scheme requires only a broad transition, a narrow transition, and a metastable state, so the paper argues it transfers to other alkaline-earth-like atoms and can be extended to two dimensions by cooling on the metastable manifold.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Beyond the paper: because the velocity width is controlled by a single laser-power knob, SVS could rapidly switch the velocity class of a continuous beam without changing oven conditions, which would be useful for sequentially loading cavity or lattice sites.
  • Beyond the paper: the 50% efficiency ceiling for symmetric distributions (absent the push beam) could be raised toward unity with an angled nozzle geometry, a direct engineering modification suggested by the paper's own analysis.
  • Beyond the paper: a clean test of the density-independence claim would be to raise the oven temperature and verify that γ_sw stays constant while the coupled atom number N_C grows; the paper leaves this scaling study to future work.
  • Beyond the paper: since selected atoms reside in metastable states, downstream cooling on a separate transition (e.g., green molasses on 3P2→3D3) could extend SVS to two transverse dimensions, as the paper's outlook anticipates.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

5 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper introduces Swept Velocity Shelving (SVS), a laser-based scheme for collimating a selected transverse velocity class in a dense atomic beam. A one-sided broadband 'sweep' beam decelerates ground-state atoms, a narrow 'selection' beam excites a chosen velocity class, and a 'shelving' beam transfers those atoms into long-lived metastable states. The authors first model the absorption-induced force imbalance of conventional molasses at high density, then simulate SVS for strontium using rate and Bloch equations, and finally implement the scheme in a thermal Sr beam. The prepared ensemble is characterized by cavity normal-mode spectroscopy, yielding an effective linewidth γ_eff = 2π × 1.37(5) MHz, a Doppler contribution γ_sw ≈ 2π × 1.02 MHz, and an inferred longitudinal velocity spread v_z^max = 0.7 ± 0.1 m/s. The central claim is that the final velocity spread is nearly independent of atomic density, in contrast to molasses, and that the experiment agrees with simulation.

Significance. If the density-independence claim holds, SVS offers a qualitatively new route to high-flux, narrow-velocity atomic beams for continuous clocks, cavity QED, and atom interferometry, avoiding the absorption-induced force imbalance that limits molasses at high optical density. The concept is elegant and the cavity transmission diagnostic is well suited to the problem. The paper's concrete strengths are the measured width being close to the power-broadened selection width, the simulation reproducing the observed scale, and the clear identification of a parameter regime where the final width is set by selection-beam broadening. However, the high-density advantage is not experimentally established: the experimental density is roughly 300 times below the regime where the molasses argument is made, and the density-independence rests on a simulation that uses an approximate shelving model. The paper is a solid proof-of-concept but overreaches in its conclusions unless the simulation evidence is strengthened or the claims are re-scoped.

major comments (5)
  1. [Sec. 4.1 and Fig. 4] The claim that 'the achievable velocity spread in this scheme is nearly independent of the atomic density' is supported by simulations at n = 2×10^11 cm^-3, but the experimental demonstration (Sec. 3.2.2) is at ρ ≈ 7×10^8 cm^-3, about 300 times lower. Moreover, the high-density simulation uses s_sw = 20 while the low-density simulation uses s_sw = 4 (§2.2.2 and Fig. 4 caption), so the density independence is not automatic; it requires re-optimization of the sweeping beam. The experiment therefore demonstrates narrow velocity selection at moderate density but does not test the central high-density advantage. Please either add an experimental point at higher density (e.g., higher oven temperature) or restrict the conclusion to a simulation-based prediction and explicitly state that the experimental verification of density independence is outstanding.
  2. [App. A.4 and Eq. A.13] The reported v_z^max = 0.7 ± 0.1 m/s is obtained by subtracting γ_homo ≈ 2π × 0.35 MHz from the fitted γ_eff = 2π × 1.37 MHz. The homogeneous estimate is dominated by transit-time broadening (≈2π × 315 kHz) plus unspecified stray-light/γ terms, and no uncertainty is assigned to γ_homo. Since γ_homo is about one quarter of γ_eff, the subtraction propagates directly into the inferred velocity. In addition, the model itself (Sec. 2.2.1 and Fig. 4c) predicts a sinc² velocity profile from the square selection pulse, which is only approximated by the Lorentzian assumed in the susceptibility model of App. A.2. Please provide an uncertainty budget for γ_homo and a sensitivity check of v_z^max to the lineshape assumption, or an independent velocity measurement.
  3. [Sec. 3.1 vs App. A.6] The measured N_C is the number of ground-state atoms after the repumping stage, whose efficiency is stated as approximately 70% in Sec. 3.1. The density and flux quoted in Sec. 3.2.2 (ρ ≈ 7.0×10^8 cm^-3, Φ ≈ 5.7×10^11 s^-1) appear to use N = 2(G/g0)^2 without dividing by this repumping probability. If N, ρ, and Φ are intended to describe the total shelved beam, they should be corrected upward by roughly 1/0.7; if not, the text should define them as ground-state quantities after repumping. This also affects the comparison with the molasses N_C value.
  4. [Sec. 2.2.2 and Fig. 4] The density-independence simulation relies on a 'fixed-efficiency approximation' for the shelving step, with a statement that it was validated against the full 13-level Bloch model over representative (f,d) samples. No validation data or code are included. Since this approximation is precisely what could hide density-dependent shelving losses (for example, due to attenuation of the selection or shelving beams at high density), please include the validation comparison or provide a quantitative statement of the agreement and the parameter range over which the approximation holds.
  5. [Sec. 3.2.3] The comparison with conventional molasses uses Ref. [28], obtained in an earlier setup with N_C ≈ 4×10^5, while the present SVS data have N_C ≈ 1.4×10^5 and a shorter interaction region. The claimed advantages ('no observable tilt contribution' and a factor-of-three narrower Doppler width) are therefore not a controlled same-apparatus, same-run comparison. Please list the relevant differences (interaction length, oven temperature, beam geometry, atomic density) and avoid presenting the comparison as a direct experimental demonstration of superiority at high density.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Fig. 4 caption and Sec. 2.2.2] Density units are given as 'at/m3' in the figure caption and text, while Sec. 2.1 and the experimental section use cm^-3. Please use a single unit system; also, the caption reads 'n = 10^9 at/m3' for panel (b), whereas the text says n = 2×10^9 at/m3.
  2. [Sec. 3.2.2 vs Sec. 4.1] The reported widths are inconsistent: Sec. 3.2.2 quotes γ_sw ≈ 2π × 1.02 MHz, Sec. 4.1 quotes 2π × (1.05 ± 0.1) MHz, and the selection-beam power-broadened width is given as ~0.75 MHz in Sec. 3.2.2 but ~0.8 MHz in Sec. 4.1. Please unify these values and specify whether the conclusions refer to γ_eff or to the Doppler-only contribution γ_sw.
  3. [Sec. 2.2.1 and Sec. 3.1] The theory section describes the shelving beam as pulsed (τ_sh ≡ τ_sw), while the experimental implementation operates the shelving beam continuously. Please clarify how the continuous shelving is treated in the model and comment on any possible higher-order effects of the continuous coupling.
  4. [Sec. 2.1] There are typos: 'addional' should be 'additional' and 'increasese' should be 'increases'. The appendix title 'Atom number, density and total flux trough the cavity' should read 'through the cavity'.
  5. [Fig. 1 and Sec. 2.2.2] The notation for the interaction region is inconsistent: Fig. 1 uses H for the interaction height, while later sections use L (e.g., L = 2.5 cm). Please define both symbols explicitly and use them consistently.
  6. [App. A.4] The homogeneous broadening estimate in Eq. A.11 includes a stray-light-induced decoherence rate γ_B, but no estimate or bound is given for γ_B. Please state its value or state explicitly that it is negligible compared with the transit-time term.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the selection-bandwidth result is by design, but it is independently confirmed by cavity spectroscopy; density-independence is a simulation extrapolation, not a circular fit.

full rationale

I walked the claimed derivation chain and found no step where a result reduces by construction to its own input. The final velocity spread is indeed set by the selection-beam power broadening (Eq. 6) and by the chosen s_sel=10^4, but the paper does not fit that width to the cavity data; it independently measures the effective linewidth gamma_eff from normal-mode splitting and then subtracts an independently estimated homogeneous contribution to obtain v_z^max=0.7 m/s, which is consistent with, rather than forced to equal, the selection-beam width. The simulation output (0.48-0.50 m/s) is a full dynamical calculation, not a refitting of Eq. 6, and its agreement with the analytical selection bandwidth is a consistency check, not a circular reduction. The density-independence claim is supported only by simulation across two densities and by one low-density experimental point; the paper explicitly states that systematic scaling studies are left for future work, making this an extrapolation or scope limitation rather than a circular step. Self-citations to [28] provide an experimental molasses benchmark and beam parameters, but the molasses degradation mechanism is also derived theoretically in Sec. 2.1, so the self-citation is not load-bearing. No ansatz is smuggled in via citation, and no uniqueness theorem is imported. The identified weaknesses (single-density experiment, Lorentzian approximation of a sinc^2 selection profile, estimated gamma_homo) are modeling or statistical limitations, not definitional circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No new physical entities are introduced; the 'reservoir' is the existing 3P0/3P2 metastable manifold of 88Sr. The central claims rest mainly on modeling choices: the Lorentzian-additive broadening extraction, constant v_x, the fixed-efficiency shelving approximation, and the choice of s_sel/s_sw. The most important free parameter is s_sel, because Eq. 6 makes the predicted velocity width an input rather than an independent output.

free parameters (4)
  • Sweeping-beam saturation s_sw = 4 (low-density sim), 20 (high-density sim)
    Chosen to match the experimental implementation and scaled to compensate simulated beam attenuation; sets the capture range v_max ≈ 32 m/s.
  • Selection-beam saturation s_sel = 10^4
    Matches the experimental power-broadened linewidth (≈750 kHz) and sets the predicted velocity spread through Eq. 6; the headline Δv_z is largely an input.
  • Homogeneous broadening γ_homo = ≈2π×0.35 MHz
    Estimated transit-time broadening (~315 kHz) plus stray-light/γ terms; subtracted from γ_eff in Eq. A.13, so it directly controls the reported v_z=0.7 m/s.
  • Initial transverse velocity distribution = v0_z=5 m/s, truncated [-5, 32] m/s
    Set by microtube geometry and assumed v_max; determines the efficiency maps and the fraction of atoms captured.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Beer-Lambert absorption with an x-independent uniform density captures molasses force imbalance (Sec. 2.1).
    Used to motivate the absorption-limited regime; the authors explicitly call it an illustrative calculation, not a full self-consistent simulation.
  • domain assumption Atoms move with constant longitudinal velocity v_x and no motion along y; interaction time is set by mean v_x (Sec. 2 intro, Sec. 3.2.2).
    Determines how many SVS cycles each atom experiences; the paper attributes part of the frequency mismatch to the real v_x distribution.
  • domain assumption Homogeneous and Doppler broadening are Lorentzian and add linearly, so γ_eff = γ_homo + γ_sw (App. A.4, Eq. A.13).
    Required to convert measured cavity linewidth into v_z^max; a non-Lorentzian lineshape would bias the headline velocity spread.
  • domain assumption Shelving transfer can be represented by a fixed efficiency uniform across the selected velocity class (Sec. 2.2.2).
    Adopted for computational speed; only qualitatively validated against 13-level OBEs, with no shown residuals.
  • domain assumption Continuous shelving beam in the experiment has negligible higher-order effects relative to the gated model (Sec. 3.1).
    Stated by the authors as not considered; could affect transfer efficiency and linewidth.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Collimation of dense atomic beams by Swept Velocity Shelving." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/2PW5BNCN

@misc{pith2026260728873,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Collimation of dense atomic beams by Swept Velocity Shelving},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/2PW5BNCN}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.28873}
}
read the original abstract

Engineering continuous, high-flux, and collimated atomic beams is a useful resource for metrology and material deposition. Developments in this area have been essential for the evolution of cold-atom based quantum experiments, yet the ubiquitous balanced-force methods such as transverse molasses cooling degrade at high atomic flux due to absorption-induced force imbalance. We introduce a collimation scheme that combines the use of a broadband transition for velocity shifting with a narrowband transition for velocity selection, enabling velocity-selective beam collimation without relying on balanced-power counter-propagating beams. Collimated atoms are shelved in a long-lived internal state, reducing the total light scattering and providing a state-heralded collimated beam. Simulations using strontium as a model system show a highly effective collimation process that does not suffer from absorption-induced force-imbalance and experimental results agree well with these predictions.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.28873 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Minimal sketch of the collimation concept. (a) An atomic beam traverses [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. One–dimensional optical molasses in the presence of absorption by a dense [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Schematic of the swept velocity shelving (SVS) technique. (a–b) Atomic [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (4 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: SVS efficiency simulations η for (a) n = 2 × 1011 at/m3 , ssw = 20 and (b) n = 2 × 109 at/m3 , ssw = 4 for N = 42 atoms as a function of sweeping frequency f and duty cycle d. The circular marker indicates the high-efficiency operating point ( f = 850 kHz, d = 50%). (c…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Experimental optimization of duty cycle and switching frequency for swept [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Pump-power dependence of the effective atomic linewidth. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Normal-mode splitting and avoided crossing of the coupled atom–cavity [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p021_7.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

48 extracted references · 22 canonical work pages

  1. [28]

    Zero-Dead-Time Operation of Interleaved Atomic Clocks , author =. Phys. Rev. Lett. , volume =. 2013 , month =

    2013

  2. [1]

    Atom cooling in one dimension with high-intensity laser light , author =. Phys. Rev. A , volume =. 1998 , month =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.57.401 , url =

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.57.401 1998

  3. [2]

    P. D. Lett and W. D. Phillips and S. L. Rolston and C. E. Tanner and R. N. Watts and C. I. Westbrook , journal =. Optical molasses , volume =. 1989 , url =. doi:10.1364/JOSAB.6.002084 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1364/josab.6.002084 1989

  4. [3]

    and Lu, Hsin-I and Doyle, John M

    Hutzler, Nicholas R. and Lu, Hsin-I and Doyle, John M. , title =. Chemical Reviews , volume =. 2012 , doi =

    2012

  5. [4]

    , title =

    Li, Yang and Kitching, John and Hummon, Matthew T. , title =. arXiv:2509.20619 , year =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2509.20619 , url =

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2509.20619

  6. [5]

    Höschele, Jonatan and Buob, Sandra and Rubio-Abadal, Antonio and Makhalov, Vasiliy and Tarruell, Leticia , title =. Phys. Rev. Applied , volume =. 2023 , doi =

    2023

  7. [6]

    Barker and Eric B

    Stephen Eckel and Daniel S. Barker and Eric B. Norrgard and Julia Scherschligt , keywords =. PyLCP: A Python package for computing laser cooling physics , journal =. 2022 , issn =. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpc.2021.108166 , url =

    arXiv 2022

  8. [7]

    An interferometer for atoms , author =. Phys. Rev. Lett. , volume =. 1991 , month =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.66.2693 , url =

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.66.2693 1991

Show all 48 references
  1. [8]

    Three-Dimensional Cooling of an Atom-Beam Source for High-Contrast Atom Interferometry , author =. Phys. Rev. Appl. , volume =. 2020 , month =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevApplied.13.044057 , url =

    2020 doi

  2. [9]

    Nature , volume=

    Continuous operation of a coherent 3,000-qubit system , author=. Nature , volume=. 2025 , month=. doi:10.1038/s41586-025-09596-6 , issn=

    2025 doi

  3. [10]

    , title =

    Gardner, Jamie and Castillo-Garza, Rodrigo and Raizen, Mark G. , title =. J. Chem. Phys. , volume =. 2013 , month =. doi:10.1063/1.4819897 , url =

    2013 doi

  4. [11]

    Phillips and John V

    William D. Phillips and John V. Prodan and Harold J. Metcalf , journal =. Laser cooling and electromagnetic trapping of neutral atoms , volume =. 1985 , url =. doi:10.1364/JOSAB.2.001751 , abstract =

    1985 doi

  5. [12]

    2025 , date =

    Fam\`a, Francesca , title =. 2025 , date =

    2025

  6. [13]

    Continuous cavity QED with an atomic beam , author =. Phys. Rev. A , volume =. 2024 , month =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.110.063721 , url =

    2024 doi

  7. [14]

    Beli Silva , title =

    C. Beli Silva , title =. 2025 , url =

    2025

  8. [15]

    M. G. Raizen and R. J. Thompson and R. J. Brecha and H. J. Kimble and H. J. Carmichael , title =. Physical Review Letters , volume =. 1989 , doi =

    1989

  9. [16]

    R. J. Thompson and G. Rempe and H. J. Kimble , title =. Physical Review Letters , volume =. 1992 , doi =

    1992

  10. [17]

    Norcia and James K

    Matthew A. Norcia and James K. Thompson , title =. Physical Review A , volume =. 2016 , doi =

    2016

  11. [18]

    Gauthier and S

    Yifu Zhu and Daniel J. Gauthier and S. E. Morin and Qilin Wu and H. J. Carmichael and T. W. Mossberg , title =. Physical Review Letters , volume =. 1990 , doi =

    1990

  12. [19]

    Metcalf and Peter van der Straten , title =

    Harold J. Metcalf and Peter van der Straten , title =. 1999 , edition =

    1999

  13. [20]

    Zero-Dead-Time Strontium Lattice Clock with a Stability at

    Liu, Xiao-Yong and Liu, Peng and Li, Jie and Zhang, Yu-Chen and Wang, Yuan-Bo and Jia, Zhi-Peng and Zhang, Xiang and Zhu, Xian-Qing and Kong, De-Quan and Song, Wen-Lan and Niu, Guo-Zhen and Yang, Yu-Meng and Feng, Pei-Jun and Liu, Xiang-Pei and Cui, Xing-Yang and Xu, Ping and ...

    2025 doi

  14. [21]

    arXiv:2509.07833 , year =

    El Badawi, Jana and Delehaye, Marion and Bellomo, Bruno , title =. arXiv:2509.07833 , year =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2509.07833 , url =

    doi arXiv

  15. [22]

    Prospects for a Millihertz-Linewidth Laser , author =. Phys. Rev. Lett. , volume =. 2009 , month =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.102.163601 , url =

    2009 doi

  16. [23]

    and Yu, Xianquan and Touzard, Steven and Shankar, Athreya and Holland, Murray J

    Liu, Haonan and J\"ager, Simon B. and Yu, Xianquan and Touzard, Steven and Shankar, Athreya and Holland, Murray J. and Nicholson, Travis L. , journal =. Rugged m. 2020 , month =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.125.253602 , url =

    2020 doi

  17. [24]

    Continuous

    Chen, Chun-Chia and González Escudero, Rodrigo and Minář, Jiří and Pasquiou, Benjamin and Bennetts, Shayne and Schreck, Florian , month = jun, year =. Continuous. doi:10.1038/s41586-022-04731-z , journal =

    doi

  18. [25]

    M. A. Norcia and H. Kim and W. B. Cairncross and M. Stone and A. Ryou and M. Jaffe and M. O. Brown and K. Barnes and P. Battaglino and T. C. Bohdanowicz et al. , title =. PRX Quantum , volume =. 2024 , doi =

    2024

  19. [26]

    Steady-state magneto-optical trap of fermionic strontium on a narrow-line transition , author =. Phys. Rev. Res. , volume =. 2021 , month =

    2021

  20. [27]

    Continuous recoil-driven lasing and cavity frequency pinning with laser-cooled atoms , journal =

    Sch. Continuous recoil-driven lasing and cavity frequency pinning with laser-cooled atoms , journal =. 2025 , doi =

    2025

  21. [29]

    Atom Interferometry with up to 24-Photon-Momentum-Transfer Beam Splitters , author =. Phys. Rev. Lett. , volume =. 2008 , month =

    2008

  22. [30]

    Nature Physics , author =

    Coherence limits in lattice atom interferometry at the one-minute scale , volume =. Nature Physics , author =. 2024 , pages =. doi:10.1038/s41567-024-02518-9 , number =

    2024 doi

  23. [31]

    Continuous cloud position spectroscopy using a magneto-optical trap , author =. Phys. Rev. Appl. , volume =. 2026 , month =. doi:10.1103/wdp6-98wh , url =

    2026 doi

  24. [32]

    , title =

    Li, Yiyi and Bao, Yicheng and Peper, Michael and Li, Chenyuan and Thompson, Jeff D. , title =. arXiv:2506.15633 , year =

    arXiv

  25. [33]

    Quasicontinuous sub-

    Boughdachi, Sana and Heizenreder, Benedikt and Sitaram, Ananya and Dierikx, Erik and Xie, Yan and Klemann, Sander and Klop, Paul and Koelemeij, Jeroen and Wilk, Rafa. Quasicontinuous sub-. Phys. Rev. Appl. , volume =. 2026 , month =. doi:10.1103/3gnx-4s97 , url =

    2026 doi

  26. [34]

    Dual-Element, Two-Dimensional Atom Array with Continuous-Mode Operation , author =. Phys. Rev. X , volume =. 2022 , month =

    2022

  27. [35]

    Applied Physics Express , author =

    Longitudinal. Applied Physics Express , author =. 2021 , pages =. doi:10.35848/1882-0786/ac0e16 , number =

    2021 doi

  28. [36]

    and Heizenreder, Benedikt and Zhou, Sheng and Bennetts, Shayne and Sch\"affer, Stefan Alaric and Sitaram, Ananya and Schreck, Florian , journal =

    Dubey, Swadheen and Kazakov, Georgy A. and Heizenreder, Benedikt and Zhou, Sheng and Bennetts, Shayne and Sch\"affer, Stefan Alaric and Sitaram, Ananya and Schreck, Florian , journal =. Modeling of a continuous superradiant laser on the sub-m. 2025 , month =

    2025

  29. [37]

    PRX Quantum , volume =

    Narrowline Laser Cooling and Spectroscopy of Molecules via Stark States , author =. PRX Quantum , volume =. 2025 , month =. doi:10.1103/9v1s-d6bd , url =

    2025 doi

  30. [38]

    Laser-cooled ^

    Kogel, Felix and Garg, Tatsam and Rockenh\"auser, Marian and Langen, Tim , journal =. Laser-cooled ^. 2025 , month =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevResearch.7.L022041 , url =

    2025 doi

  31. [39]

    van Hofslot, J. W. F. and Thompson, I. E. and Touwen, A. and Balasubramanian, N. and Bause, R. and Bethlem, H. L. and Borschevsky, A. and Fikkers, T. H. and Hoekstra, S. and Jones, S. A. and Levenga, J. E. J. , title =. Comms. Phys. , volume =. 2026 , doi =

    2026

  32. [40]

    Continuous operation of large-scale atom arrays in optical lattices , author =. Phys. Rev. Res. , volume =. 2024 , month =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevResearch.6.033104 , url =

    2024 doi

  33. [41]

    Three-stage laser cooling of

    Akatsuka, Tomoya and Hashiguchi, Koji and Takahashi, Tadahiro and Ohmae, Noriaki and Takamoto, Masao and Katori, Hidetoshi , journal =. Three-stage laser cooling of. 2021 , month =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.103.023331 , url =

    2021 doi

  34. [42]

    Shangyan Li and Min Zhou and Xinye Xu , title =. Sci. Rep. , year =. doi:10.1038/s41598-018-28218-y , url =

    doi

  35. [43]

    Dalibard , abstract =

    J. Dalibard , abstract =. Laser cooling of an optically thick gas: The simplest radiation pressure trap? , journal =. 1988 , issn =. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-4018(88)90185-X , url =

    1988 doi

  36. [44]

    2005 , publisher=

    Atomic physics , author=. 2005 , publisher=

    2005

  37. [45]

    Weiss and Erling Riis and Yaakov Shevy and P

    David S. Weiss and Erling Riis and Yaakov Shevy and P. Jeffrey Ungar and Steven Chu , journal =. Optical molasses and multilevel atoms: experiment , volume =. 1989 , url =. doi:10.1364/JOSAB.6.002072 , abstract =

    1989 doi

  38. [46]

    Single-Photon Atomic Cooling , author =. Phys. Rev. Lett. , volume =. 2008 , month =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.100.093004 , url =

    2008 doi

  39. [47]

    Entropy exchange in laser cooling , author =. Phys. Rev. A , volume =. 2008 , month =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.77.061401 , url =

    2008 doi

  40. [48]

    Single-atom detection with optical cavities , author =. Phys. Rev. A , volume =. 2008 , month =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.78.013640 , url =

    2008 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 3, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.