Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Acyclic graphs with at least $2\ell+1$ vertices are $\ell$-recognizable

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2308.04509 v1 pith:2Q5ZCMO4 submitted 2023-08-08 math.CO

classification math.CO
keywords familyrecognizablevertexgraphgraphswhendeckvertices
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

The $(n-\ell)$-deck of an $n$-vertex graph is the multiset of subgraphs obtained from it by deleting $\ell$ vertices. A family of $n$-vertex graphs is $\ell$-recognizable if every graph having the same $(n-\ell)$-deck as a graph in the family is also in the family. We prove that the family of $n$-vertex graphs with no cycles is $\ell$-recognizable when $n\ge2\ell+1$ (except for $(n,\ell)=(5,2)$). As a consequence, the family of $n$-vertex trees is $\ell$-recognizable when $n\ge2\ell+1$ and $\ell\ne2$. It is known that this fails when $n=2\ell$.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools