REVIEW 3 major objections 6 minor 50 references
On an eigenvalue problem associated with mixed operators under mixed boundary conditions
T0 review · 3 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash
Pith's one-line read A single eigenvalue of the mixed operator fixes both the bifurcation from zero and the bifurcation from infinity.
desk verdict A genuinely new setting with a load-bearing normalization error in the simplicity proof; the main results will likely survive once Proposition 3.4(3) is fixed. read the letter →
The pith
A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.
The reading
What carries the argument
The central object is the Hilbert space $X_{\mathcal{D}}^{1,2}(U)$ of $H^1$ functions on $\mathbb{R}^n$ that vanish outside $U = \Omega \cup \mathcal{N} \cup (\partial\Omega \cap \overline{\mathcal{N}})$, equipped with the norm $\eta(u)^2 = \int_\Omega |\nabla u|^2\,dx + \int_Q \frac{|u(x)-u(y)|^2}{|x-y|^{n+2s}}\,dx\,dy$, where $Q$ excludes pairs both outside $\Omega^c \times \Omega^c$; the Rayleigh quotient in this space defines $\lambda_1(\mathcal{D})$. The argument is carried by three devices: a strong maximum principle built from Bony's maximum principle and a Hopf lemma, a Picone-type inequality that yields simplicity and sign-changing behavior, and compactness of the inverse operator $K = \mathcal{L}^{-1}: X \to X$. For bifurcation, the paper uses the Leray-Schauder degree to show the index of $I_\lambda$ changes only at $\lambda_0$, then applies the classical Crandall-Rabinowitz and Rabinowitz global bifurcation theorems; bifurcation from infinity is converted to bifurcation from zero by the inversion $v = u/\|u\|^2$.
What would settle it
Check whether a first eigenfunction on a domain with $\mathcal{N}$ nonempty has $\int_{\mathcal{N}} \phi_1^2 > 0$: if so, the normalization $\|\phi_1\|_{L^2(U)} = 1$ used in the simplicity proof is incompatible with the variational constraint $\int_\Omega |\phi_1|^2 = 1$, and the proportionality conclusion needs a different argument. A second check: for $h(s) = s - s^p$, $f(t) = -t^p$, so the strict positivity of $f$ used in Lemmas 5.4 and 5.10 is false; testing the claimed bound $\lambda < \theta \lambda_1(\mathcal{D})$ for this $h$ would show whether the branch estimates still hold.
Extended reading notes
Core claim
On the paper's own terms, the central discovery is that the spectrum of the mixed local-nonlocal operator with mixed boundary conditions has a principal eigenvalue $\lambda_1(\mathcal{D}) > 0$ with the properties expected of a cooperative linear operator: simplicity, sign-definite eigenfunctions, and H\"older continuity, with all higher eigenvalues having sign-changing eigenfunctions. This eigenvalue alone determines where the nonlinear problem $(Q_\lambda)$ can bifurcate: the paper proves that $\lambda_0 = \lambda_1(\mathcal{D})/a$ is the unique bifurcation point from the trivial solution and $\lambda_\infty = \lambda_1(\mathcal{D})/\theta$ the unique bifurcation point from infinity, and that each bifurcation produces an unbounded connected set $\Gamma_0$, $\Gamma_\infty$ of positive solutions. It further proves qualitative behavior of $\lambda_1(\mathcal{D})$ under geometric limits: $\lambda_1(\mathcal{D}_k) \to \lambda_1(\mathbb{R}^n \setminus \Omega)$ as the Neumann sets dissipate, and $\lambda_1(\mathcal{D}_k) \to 0$ as the Dirichlet sets dissipate when $0 < s < 1/2$, with partial extensions for $s \ge 1/2$.
Load-bearing premise
The proof that $\lambda_1(\mathcal{D})$ is simple assumes the eigenfunction $\phi_1$ can be normalized in $L^2(U)$ even though the variational problem that produces $\phi_1$ fixes only $\int_\Omega |\phi_1|^2 = 1$, and since eigenfunctions need not vanish on $\mathcal{N}$, this normalization is not justified; a second fragile assumption is the strict positivity $f(t) > 0$ used in Lemmas 5.4 and 5.10, which is not part of hypotheses (f1)-(f3) and fails for $h(s) = s - s^p$.
Editorial extensions
If this is right
- For any asymptotically linear $h$ satisfying (f1)-(f3), the only way positive solutions can emerge from the zero solution is at $\lambda_0 = \lambda_1(\mathcal{D})/a$, and the branch that emerges is unbounded.
- The only possible bifurcation from infinity occurs at $\lambda_\infty = \lambda_1(\mathcal{D})/\theta$, and it also yields an unbounded connected set of positive solutions.
- If the Neumann region shrinks to nothing, the first eigenvalue of the mixed problem converges to that of the pure Dirichlet problem for $\mathcal{L}$ on $\mathbb{R}^n \setminus \Omega$.
- If the Dirichlet region disperses and $0 < s < 1/2$, the first eigenvalue collapses to zero, matching the pure Neumann case; a partial result holds for $s \ge 1/2$ under additional geometric conditions.
- Every eigenvalue above $\lambda_1(\mathcal{D})$ has sign-changing eigenfunctions, so $\lambda_1(\mathcal{D})$ is the only eigenvalue with a one-signed eigenfunction.
Reading between the lines
- A natural testable extension: the same uniqueness-and-unbounded-branch structure should hold for the $p$-Laplacian version $-\Delta_p + (-\Delta_p)^s$ under the same mixed boundary data, provided the analogue of $\lambda_1(\mathcal{D})$ is simple; the paper cites the $p$-eigenvalue literature but does not prove this case.
- The bifurcation-from-infinity analysis via $v = u/\|u\|^2$ suggests that rescaling any solution family in $L^\infty$ produces a compact perturbation problem; this inversion could be used to extract refined asymptotics of $\Gamma_\infty$ near $\lambda_\infty$, which the paper does not compute.
- If simplicity of $\lambda_1(\mathcal{D})$ fails in some geometry, the bifurcation picture could be richer, with multiple local branches; a numerical check on a domain with a nonempty Neumann set could discriminate.
- The condition $f(t) > 0$ used in the bound $\lambda < \theta \lambda_1(\mathcal{D})$ is not guaranteed by the hypotheses and fails for the logistic-type example $h(s) = s - s^p$; if it is dropped, the paper's claimed branch range for such $h$ may require an alternative argument.
Editorial analysis
A structured set of objections, weighed in public.
Referee Report
Summary. The paper studies the eigenvalue problem for the mixed local-nonlocal operator L = -Δ + (-Δ)^s under mixed Dirichlet and Neumann conditions, defines a Rayleigh quotient λ1(D), and proves existence, positivity, boundedness, Hölder regularity, and simplicity of the first eigenfunction. It then studies the asymptotic behavior of λ1(D) as the Neumann or Dirichlet sets dissipate, and applies these results to an asymptotically linear problem Qλ, proving the existence of unique bifurcation points from zero and from infinity, each generating an unbounded connected component of positive solutions. The main theorems are Theorem 2.7, Theorem 2.8, Theorem 2.9, and Theorem 2.10.
Significance. If the proofs are completed, the paper makes a useful contribution by extending principal-eigenvalue and bifurcation theory from purely local and purely nonlocal settings to a mixed operator with mixed boundary conditions. The dissipating-set results and the bifurcation-from-infinity treatment are natural extensions of known work by Leonori et al. and by Arcoya-Gámez, and the paper contains several self-contained tools of independent interest: the weak maximum principle, the L∞ bound for first eigenfunctions, the compactness of the solution operator, and the regularity appendix. The variational construction of λ1(D) and the positivity of the first eigenfunction are standard and appear sound. However, the proof of simplicity contains a normalization error that is load-bearing for the local bifurcation argument, and the hypotheses in Section 5 do not match some stated examples; these issues require a major revision.
major comments (3)
- [Section 3, Proposition 3.4(3), Eq. (3.0.16)] The proof of simplicity is not valid as written. The variational constraint used in Assertion 2 and in the definition (2.0.2) is ∫Ω |u|² dx = 1, but Assertion 3 normalizes the second eigenfunction by ‖φ2‖_{L²(U)}=1 and claims that ‖φ1‖_{L²(U)}=1 'from the proof of assertion 2'. This claim is unjustified: since N_s φ1 = 0 in N, the values of φ1 on N are determined by its values on Ω through the weighted-average formula in Lemma 3.1, and the L²(U)-norm is not fixed by the minimization. Consequently, identity (3.0.16), ∫_U(φ1² - φ̃2²)dx = 1 - 1 = 0, is not established, and the dichotomy (3.0.15) does not force φ1² = φ̃2². This is load-bearing because Theorem 2.9 later invokes Crandall-Rabinowitz bifurcation from a simple eigenvalue and uses uniqueness of the local branch to exclude closed loops in the unboundedness proof. The argument can likely be repaired by normalizing both eigenfunctions in L²(Ω), deriving φ1² = φ2² a.e. in Ω, and then propagating equality to N using the nonlocal Neumann condition; but the present proof needs correction.
- [Section 5, Lemmas 5.4 and 5.10, and Remark 5.11] The proofs of Lemmas 5.4 and 5.10 use the strict inequality f(t)>0 for all t, but this is not stated in hypothesis (f2), which only gives f: R → R+ with |f(t)| ≤ C. If R+ means nonnegative, then only f(t) ≥ 0 is available; if R+ means positive, then the example h(s)=s-s^p advertised in Remark 5.11 has f(s)=-s^p and is excluded even from nonnegativity. Thus the strict inequality λ1(D) > λθ in Lemma 5.4 and the strict contradiction in Lemma 5.10 are not justified under the stated hypotheses. Please either add an explicit strict-positivity hypothesis to (f2), or weaken the conclusions accordingly and reconcile this with Remark 5.11.
- [Section 5.1, proof of Theorem 2.9] The Crandall-Rabinowitz step is stated imprecisely at a point where precision matters. After defining λ0 = λ1(D)/a, the proof writes T = ∂_u I(λ1(D),0) = Id - λ1(D)K and immediately invokes bifurcation from (λ1(D)/a,0). The correct linearization is ∂_u I(λ0,0) = Id - λ0 h'(0) K, which equals Id - λ1(D)K only when h'(0)=a; the phrase 'we may assume h'(0)=1' is not a harmless normalization because λ0 depends on a. The transversality condition is also written in a garbled form. Please state h'(0)=a, evaluate the derivative at λ0, and formulate the transversality condition as ∂²_{λu}I(λ0,0)ψ ∉ R(T).
minor comments (6)
- [Section 5.2, proof of Theorem 2.10] In the proof of Theorem 2.10, the intervals are written with λ0 where λ∞ is meant, and the condition '0 < ‖u‖ ≤ 1/R' should refer to v in the transformed problem; please correct these statements.
- [Section 5, Lemma 5.3, Eq. (5.0.4)] Equation (5.0.4) concerns the problem Lu = w, but it contains a factor λ multiplying ∫Ω w φ_k dx; this λ should be removed.
- [Section 3, Proposition 3.4(4)] Assertion 4 contains a duplicated sentence defining φ2 and the ε-regularized test function, and the notation uε is introduced twice; the passage should be cleaned up.
- [Throughout, hypotheses (f1)-(f3)] The convention for R+ is ambiguous: the statement f: R → R+ with |f(t)| ≤ C is not compatible with the extension h(t)=0 for t≤0 unless the extension is specified separately. Please state explicitly whether R+ means (0,∞) or [0,∞).
- [Theorem 2.8 and Section 4.2] The assumption 'lim_{k→∞} |D_k ∩ ∂Ω| = 0' is automatically satisfied for open sets D_k ⊂ R^n \ Ω̄; the intended condition is presumably lim_{k→∞} |D̄_k ∩ ∂Ω| = 0. Please clarify this point.
- [Remark 5.11] The displayed 'curves' in Remark 5.11 appear to be placeholders rather than actual figures; please include the plots or remove the visual references.
Circularity Check
No significant circularity: bifurcation points derive from λ1(D) and the slopes of h, not from fitted data; the sole self-citation is non-load-bearing.
full rationale
The derivation chain is self-contained with respect to circularity. λ1(D) is defined as a Rayleigh-quotient infimum in (2.0.2), and Proposition 3.2 shows the infimum is attained and satisfies the weak eigenvalue equation (2.0.1); this is a variational characterization, not a definitional identity with the target conclusion. The bifurcation values λ0 = λ1(D)/a and λ∞ = λ1(D)/θ are computed from λ1(D) and the asymptotic slopes a and θ of the given nonlinearity h; they are not fitted parameters. Uniqueness of the bifurcation points is derived from Proposition 3.4(2)-(4), whose proof uses externally cited Picone identities ([40], [41], [2]) and the strong maximum principle, not from the bifurcation conclusions. The dissipating-set theorems (2.7, 2.8) compare λ1(Dk) with independently defined limits (λ1(Rn\Ω) from [12], and 0 from [42]) using external estimates from [39]. The only self-citation is [43] (Mukherjee and Sharma, two of the present authors) for the Picone-type inequality stated in Theorem 3.1; that theorem is not used in the later proofs, so the citation is not load-bearing. Two genuine correctness risks should be flagged, but they are not circularity: (i) in Proposition 3.4(3), the simplicity proof asserts ‖φ1‖_{L2(U)} = 1 "from the proof of assertion 2", whereas the variational constraint is ‖u‖_{L2(Ω)} = 1; (ii) Lemmas 5.4 and 5.10 use f(t) > 0, which is stronger than the stated (f2) with f ≥ 0. Neither step makes a claimed output equal to an input by construction.
Assumptions & free parameters
assumptions (9)
- standard math Sobolev and compact embedding results for X^{1,2}_D(U) into L^q_loc (Remark 2.5)
- standard math Poincare inequality for X^{1,2}_D(U) (Proposition 2.1)
- standard math W^{2,p} regularity for mixed local-nonlocal operators (from [10,33,49])
- standard math Bony maximum principle and Hopf lemma (from [33,5])
- standard math Rabinowitz global bifurcation theorem (from [47]) and Crandall-Rabinowitz theorem (from [24])
- standard math Picone inequality as stated in [43]
- domain assumption Domain configuration: Omega union N bounded with smooth boundary, Omega is C^{1,1}, D,N open disjoint, D union N = R^n \bar(Omega), N bounded
- domain assumption Nonlinearity hypotheses (f1)-(f3): h in C^1(R+,R+), h(t)=theta t+f(t) with theta>0 and |f(t)|<=C, lim h(t)/t=a at 0, h(0)=0
- ad hoc to paper Unstated assumption f(t)>0 for t>0 in Lemmas 5.4 and 5.10
Cite this review
Pith. "Pith review of On an eigenvalue problem associated with mixed operators under mixed boundary conditions." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/2RLWC422
@misc{pith2026241116499,
author = {Pith},
title = {Pith review of: On an eigenvalue problem associated with mixed operators under mixed boundary conditions},
year = {2026},
howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/2RLWC422}},
note = {Machine review of arXiv:2411.16499}
}
abstract
In this paper, we study a class of eigenvalue problems involving both local as well as nonlocal operators, precisely the classical Laplace operator and the fractional Laplace operator in the presence of mixed boundary conditions, that is \begin{equation} \label{1} \left\{\begin{split} \mathcal{L}u\: &= \lambda u,~~u>0~ \text{in} ~\Omega, u&=0~~\text{in} ~~{U^c}, \mathcal{N}_s(u)&=0 ~~\text{in} ~~{\mathcal{N}}, \frac{\partial u}{\partial \nu}&=0 ~~\text{in}~~ \partial \Omega \cap \overline{\mathcal{N}}, \end{split} \right.\tag{$P_\lambda$} \end{equation} where $U= (\Omega \cup {\mathcal{N}} \cup (\partial\Omega\cap\overline{\mathcal{N}}))$, $\Omega \subseteq \mathbb{R}^n$ is a non empty open set, $\mathcal{D}$, $\mathcal{N}$ are open subsets of $\mathbb{R}^n\setminus{\bar{\Omega }}$ such that $\overline{{\mathcal{D}} \cup {\mathcal{N}}}= \mathbb{R}^n\setminus{\Omega}$, $\mathcal{D} \cap {\mathcal{N}}= \emptyset $ and $\Omega\cup \mathcal{N}$ is a bounded set with smooth boundary, $\lambda >0$ is a real parameter and $$\mathcal{L}= -\Delta+(-\Delta)^{s},~ \text{for}~s \in (0, 1).$$ We establish the existence and some characteristics of the first eigenvalue and associated eigenfunctions to the above problem, based on the topology of the sets $\mathcal{D}$ and $\mathcal{N}$. Next, we apply these results to establish bifurcation type results, both from zero and infinity for the problem \eqref{ql} which is an asymptotically linear problem inclined with $(P_\lambda)$.
Reference graph
Works this paper leans on
-
[1]
N. Abatangelo and M. Cozzi. An elliptic boundary value pr oblem with fractional nonlinearity. SIAM Journal on Mathematical Analysis, 53(3):3577–3601, 2021. 2
work page 2021
-
[2]
W. Allegretto and Y. X. Huang. A Picone’s identity for the p-Laplacian and applications. Nonlinear Analysis , 32(7):819–830, 1998. 8
work page 1998
-
[3]
A. Ambrosetti, J. G. Azorero, and I. Peral. Multiplicity results for some nonlinear elliptic equations. Journal of Functional Analysis, 137(1):219–242, 1996. 3
work page 1996
-
[4]
A. Ambrosetti and A. Malchiodi. Nonlinear analysis and s emilinear elliptic problems. Cambridge university press , 104, 2007. 17, 20 23
work page 2007
-
[5]
C. A. Antonini and M. Cozzi. Global gradient regularity a nd a Hopf lemma for quasilinear operators of mixed local-nonlocal type. arXiv:2308.06075, 2023. 2, 5
arXiv 2023
-
[6]
D. Arcoya and J. L. G´ amez. Bifurcation theory and relate d problems: anti-maximum principle and resonance. Communications in Partial Differential Equations , 26(9-10):1879–1911, 2001. 3
work page 1911
- [7]
- [8]
Show all 50 references
-
[9]
Barrios and M
B. Barrios and M. Medina. Strong maximum principles for f ractional elliptic and parabolic problems with mixed boundary conditions. Proceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh. Section A , 150(1):475–495, 2020. 3
2020
-
[10]
Bensoussan and J
A. Bensoussan and J. L. Lions. Impulse control and quasi -variational inequalities. ,, 1984. 22
1984
-
[11]
Berestycki, J
H. Berestycki, J. Coville, and H. H. Vo. On the definition and the properties of the principal eigenvalue of some nonlocal operators. Journal of Functional Analysis , 271(10):2701–2751, 2016. 2
2016
-
[12]
S. Biagi. The Brezis-Nirenberg problem for mixed local and nonlocal operators. In Nonlocal and nonlinear PDEs at the University of Bologna , volume 14(1) of Bruno Pini Math. Anal. Semin. , pages 15–37. Univ. Bologna, Alma Mater Stud., Bologna, 2023. 2, 9
2023
-
[13]
Biagi, S
S. Biagi, S. Dipierro, E. Valdinoci, and E. Vecchi. Mixe d local and nonlocal elliptic operators: regularity and maximum principles. Communications in Partial Differential Equations , 47(3):585–629, 2022. 2, 16
2022
-
[14]
Biagi, S
S. Biagi, S. Dipierro, E. Valdinoci, and E. Vecchi. A Fab er-Krahn inequality for mixed local and nonlocal operators . Journal d’Analyse Math´ ematique, 150(2):405–448, 2023. 2, 12
2023
-
[15]
Biagi, D
S. Biagi, D. Mugnai, and E. Vecchi. Global boundedness a nd maximum principle for a Brezis-Oswald approach to mixed local and nonlocal operators. arXiv:2103.11382, 2021. 7
2021 arXiv
-
[16]
G. M. Bisci, V. D. R˘ adulescu, and R. Servadei. Variational methods for nonlocal fractional problems , volume 162. Cambridge University Press, 2016. 2
2016
-
[17]
Bougherara, J
B. Bougherara, J. Giacomoni, and S. Prashanth. Analyti c global bifurcation and infinite turning points for very singular problems. Calculus of Variations and Partial Differential Equations , 52(3-4):829–856, 2015. 19
2015
-
[18]
Buffoni and J
B. Buffoni and J. Toland. Analytic theory of global bifurcation . Princeton Series in Applied Mathematics. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 2003. An introduction. 19
2003
-
[19]
Carmona, E
J. Carmona, E. Colorado, T. Leonori, and A. Ortega. Semi linear fractional elliptic problems with mixed dirichlet- neumann boundary conditions. Fractional Calculus and Applied Analysis , 23(4):1208–1239, 2020. 11
2020
-
[20]
Chhetri and P
M. Chhetri and P. Girg. Some bifurcation results for fra ctional Laplacian problems. Nonlinear Analysis, 191:111642, 18, 2020. 3
2020
-
[21]
Colorado and I
E. Colorado and I. Peral. Semilinear elliptic problems with mixed dirichlet–neumann boundary conditions. Journal of Functional Analysis , 199(2):468–507, 2003. 11
2003
-
[22]
Colorado and I
E. Colorado and I. Peral. Eigenvalues and bifurcation f or elliptic equations with mixed dirichlet-neumann bounda ry conditions related to caffarelli-kohn-nirenberg inequali ties. Topological Methods in Nonlinear Analysis , 2004. 3
2004
-
[23]
Cowan, M
C. Cowan, M. E. Smaily, and P. A. Feulefack. The principa l eigenvalue of a mixed local and nonlocal operator with drift. arXiv:2406.19577, 2024. 2
2024 arXiv
-
[24]
M. G. Crandall and P. H. Rabinowitz. Bifurcation from si mple eigenvalues. Journal of Functional Analysis , 8(2):321–340, 1971. 3
1971
-
[25]
J. Denzler. Bounds for the heat diffusion through window s of given area. Journal of mathematical analysis and applications, 217(2):405–422, 1998. 2
1998
-
[26]
J. Denzler. Windows of given area with minimal heat diffu sion. Transactions of the American Mathematical Society, 351(2):569–580, 1999. 2
1999
-
[27]
Dipierro, E
S. Dipierro, E. P. Lippi, and E. Valdinoci. (Non) local l ogistic equations with neumann conditions. Annales de l’Institut Henri Poincar´ e C, 40(5):1093–1166, 2022. 2
2022
-
[28]
Dipierro, E
S. Dipierro, E. Proietti Lippi, and E. Valdinoci. Linea r theory for a mixed operator with neumann conditions. Asymptotic Analysis , 128(4):571–594, 2022. 2
2022
-
[29]
Dipierro, X
S. Dipierro, X. Ros-Oton, and E. Valdinoci. Nonlocal pr oblems with neumann boundary conditions. Revista Matem´ atica Iberoamericana, 33(2):377–416, 2017. 2, 4, 23
2017
-
[30]
Dipierro and E
S. Dipierro and E. Valdinoci. Description of an ecologi cal niche for a mixed local/nonlocal dispersal: an evolutio n equation and a new neumann condition arising from the superp osition of brownian and l´ evy processes. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications , ...
2021
-
[31]
Franzina and G
G. Franzina and G. Palatucci. Fractional p-eigenvalue s. Rivista di Matematica della Universita di Parma , 2013. 7, 10
2013
-
[32]
Garain and A
P. Garain and A. Ukhlov. Mixed local and nonlocal Dirich let (p,q )-eigenvalue problem. Journal of Mathematical Sciences (New York) , 270(6):782–792, 2023. 2 24
2023
-
[33]
M. G. Garroni and J. L. Menaldi. Second order elliptic integro-differential problems . Chapman and Hall/CRC,
-
[34]
E. Giusti. Direct methods in the calculus of variations . World Scientific, 2003. 7, 11
2003
-
[35]
J. B. Keller and S. Antman, editors. Bifurcation theory and nonlinear eigenvalue problems . W. A. Benjamin, Inc., New York-Amsterdam, 1969. 3
1969
-
[36]
Kesavan and V
S. Kesavan and V. Kalashnikov. Topics in functional ana lysis and applications. Acta Applicandae Mathematicae , 37(3), 1994. 7
1994
-
[37]
Kinderlehrer and G
D. Kinderlehrer and G. Stampacchia. An introduction to variational inequalities and their appl ications. SIAM,
-
[38]
M. A. Krasnosel’skii. Topological methods in the theory of nonlinear integral equ ations. The Macmillan Company, New York, 1964. 3
1964
-
[39]
Leonori, M
T. Leonori, M. Medina, I. Peral, A. Primo, and F. Soria. P rincipal eigenvalue of mixed problem for the fractional laplacian: moving the boundary conditions. Journal of Differential Equations , 265(2):593–619, 2018. 2, 11, 12, 14
2018
-
[40]
Leonori, I
T. Leonori, I. Peral, A. Primo, and F. Soria. Basic estim ates for solutions of a class of nonlocal elliptic and parabolic equations. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems , 35(12):6031–6068, 2015. 8, 16
2015
-
[41]
Motreanu, V
D. Motreanu, V. V. Motreanu, and N. S. Papageorgiou. Topological and variational methods with applications to nonlinear boundary value problems , volume 1. Springer, 2014. 8
2014
-
[42]
Mugnai and E
D. Mugnai and E. Proietti Lippi. On mixed local-nonloca l operators with ( α,β)-neumann conditions. Rendiconti del Circolo Matematico di Palermo Series 2 , 71(3):1035–1048, 2022. 9, 13
2022
-
[43]
Mukherjee and L
T. Mukherjee and L. Sharma. On nonlocal problems with mi xed operators and dirichlet-neumann mixed boundary conditions. arXiv:2311.02567, 2023. 6
2023 arXiv
-
[44]
Pagnini and S
G. Pagnini and S. Vitali. Should i stay or should i go? zer o-size jumps in random walks for l´ evy flights. Fractional Calculus and Applied Analysis , 24(1):137–167, 2021. 2
2021
-
[45]
Pellacci and G
B. Pellacci and G. Verzini. Best dispersal strategies i n spatially heterogeneous environments: optimization of t he principal eigenvalue for indefinite fractional neumann pro blems. Journal of Mathematical Biology , 76(6):1357–1386,
-
[46]
L. M. D. Pezzo, R. Ferreira, and J. D. Rossi. Eigenvalues for a combination between local and nonlocal p-laplacians. Fractional Calculus and Applied Analysis , 22(5):1414–1436, 2019. 2, 12
2019
-
[47]
Rabinowitz
P. Rabinowitz. Some global results for nonlinear eigen value problems. Journal of functional analysis , 7(3), 1971. 3, 19
1971
-
[48]
P. H. Rabinowitz. Variational methods for nonlinear ei genvalue problems. In Eigenvalues of non-linear problems , pages 139–195. Springer, 1974. 3
1974
-
[49]
X. Su, E. Valdinoci, Y. Wei, and J. Zhang. Regularity res ults for solutions of mixed local and nonlocal elliptic equations. Mathematische Zeitschrift , 302(3):1855–1878, 2022. 2, 16
2022
-
[50]
L. C. Zheng and J. C. He. A class of singular nonlinear bou ndary value problems in the theory of pseudoplastic fluids. Journal of Northeastern University. Natural Science. Dong bei, 19(2):208–211, 2023. 2 J. Giacomoni, E-mail address: jacques.giacomoni@univ-pau.fr T. Mukherjee...
2023
Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.