Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 6 minor 63 references

Precision spectroscopy of the fine and hyperfine structures of high molecular Rydberg-Stark states: Metrology of molecular hydrogen ions

T0 review · 3 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-07-09 · glm-5.2

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Rydberg-Stark spectroscopy measures molecular ion hyperfine structure

desk verdict New experimental values for b_F and c_e in molecular hydrogen ions, with systematic uncertainty budget that deserves scrutiny but holds up read the letter →

arxiv 2607.07636 v1 pith:2RZLXBR6 submitted 2026-07-08 physics.atom-ph

Ioana Doran , Leon Jeckel , Maximilian Beyer , Christian Jungen , Frédéric Merkt This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.atom-ph
keywords statesrydberghyperfinecoremolecularstructuresfineortho-d
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper demonstrates that high-n molecular Rydberg-Stark states, when studied via precision spectroscopy in weak electric fields, serve as a direct window into the fine and hyperfine structure of molecular ions that are otherwise extremely difficult to access. The core mechanism is that an external electric field mixes the orbital states of the distant Rydberg electron, decoupling it from the ion core and making the normally short-lived autoionizing states long-lived and sharp enough for precision measurement. The spectrum of these Stark states then mirrors the internal structure of the ion core. The authors apply this method to two contrasting systems — para-H₂ with a rotating (N⁺=2) ion core and ortho-D₂ with a non-rotating (N⁺=0) ion core — and show that the strikingly different spectral patterns arise from the presence or absence of anisotropic charge-quadrupole interactions between the rotating ion core and the Rydberg electron. By fitting the spectra with a combined multichannel quantum-defect theory and matrix diagonalization approach, they extract new experimental values for the Fermi-contact hyperfine coupling constant b_F of D₂⁺(v⁺=1, N⁺=0) [139.84(5) MHz], the spin-rotation coupling constant c_e of H₂⁺(v⁺=1, N⁺=2) [39.62(11) MHz], and the fundamental vibrational interval of ortho-D₂⁺ [47,279,980.8(1.9) MHz], all in agreement with ab initio theory.

What carries the argument

High-n Rydberg-Stark states in weak electric fields; multichannel quantum-defect theory (MQDT) combined with matrix diagonalization; the distinction between anisotropic charge-quadrupole interactions (present for N⁺≥1 rotating cores) and isotropic Fermi-contact hyperfine interactions (dominant for N⁺=0 non-rotating cores).

What would settle it

If the fitted b_F and c_e values disagreed with independent theoretical calculations or with future direct measurements of the same ion-core constants beyond the stated uncertainties, the Rydberg-Stark spectroscopic extraction method would be called into question.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is that the fine and hyperfine structure of molecular hydrogen ions can be precisely determined from the spectra of high-n Rydberg-Stark states, because the Stark effect makes these states long-lived and their spectral structure directly encodes the ion-core interactions. The method works for both rotating cores (where anisotropic charge-quadrupole coupling complicates the spectrum) and non-rotating cores (where the Rydberg electron motion is nearly separable from the core hyperfine dynamics), and yields coupling constants competitive with or exceeding the precision of prior experimental determinations.

Load-bearing premise

The extraction of coupling constants relies on the quantum defects and MQDT parameters used in the matrix diagonalization model being complete and accurate, particularly for the d-series quantum defects that couple most strongly to the f-series and the linear Stark manifolds; if these parameters carry unaccounted errors, the fitted b_F and c_e values would shift.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 6 minor

Summary. This manuscript reports precision spectroscopy of high-n molecular Rydberg-Stark states of para-H2 and ortho-D2 in weak electric fields, using the zero-quantum-defect method with frequency-comb calibration. By analyzing the Stark spectra with a combination of multichannel quantum-defect theory (MQDT) and matrix diagonalization, the authors extract new experimental values for the Fermi-contact hyperfine coupling constant b_F = 139.84(5) MHz of D2+(v+=1, N+=0), the spin-rotation coupling constant c_e = 39.62(11) MHz of H2+(v+=1, N+=2), and the fundamental vibrational interval of ortho-D2+ (47,279,980.8(1.9) MHz). All three values agree with independent ab initio theoretical calculations within their stated uncertainties. The paper also presents a physical interpretation of the strikingly different spectral patterns in H2 versus D2, attributing them to the role of the anisotropic charge-quadrupole interaction in the N+=2 core of H2 and its absence in the rotationless N+=0 core of D2.

Significance. The manuscript reports the first experimental determination of the hyperfine coupling constant b_F of D2+(v+=1, N+=0) and the spin-rotation constant c_e of H2+(v+=1, N+=2), both achieving sub-MHz precision. The agreement with independent theory (b_F: 139.84(5) vs 139.837(10) MHz; c_e: 39.62(11) vs 39.5716 MHz; vibrational interval: 47,279,980.8(1.9) vs 47,279,981.5898(12) MHz) provides a strong cross-check on the systematic uncertainty budget. The methodology is general and applicable to other molecular cations, and the experimental infrastructure (frequency-comb calibration, Doppler compensation, detailed error budgets in Tables SIII/SIV) is rigorous. The approach of using Rydberg-Stark states as a probe of ion-core fine and hyperfine structure is a valuable contribution to molecular ion metrology.

major comments (3)
  1. The systematic uncertainties from the d-series quantum defects are load-bearing for the extracted values of b_F and c_e, but the methodology for computing these systematics is not described in this manuscript and is deferred to the companion paper (Ref. [49], arXiv:2602.17511). The main text (page 5) states that the black error bar extensions 'reflect systematic uncertainties in the quantum defects of the d series,' but provides no further detail on how they are evaluated. Given that these systematics vary dramatically with n (e.g., from 50 kHz at n=37 to 350 kHz at n=43 for c_e in H2, per Table SII), a brief summary of the methodology here would strengthen the paper's self-containedness and allow the reader to assess the robustness of the uncertainty budget without consulting the companion paper.
  2. Several individual fits exhibit weighted RMS values well above 1 (up to 4.570 for one D2 fit at n=34, F_z=697.9 mV/cm, and 4.095 for one H2 fit at n=43, F_z=897.7 mV/cm, per Tables SI and SII). This indicates that the model does not always reproduce the data at the level of the statistical errors. The paper does not discuss these elevated RMS values or their potential implications for the final extracted parameters. A brief comment on whether these reflect underestimated statistical errors, residual model deficiencies, or specific spectral features not captured by the MQDT treatment would help the reader evaluate the reliability of the fits.
  3. The n=43 H2 measurements show notable scatter in c_e: the two fitted values are 40.313(140)(350) and 39.491(386)(350) MHz (Table SII), with the first value lying approximately 2 sigma from the final mean of 39.62(11) MHz. Similarly, the n=34 D2 measurements of b_F range from 139.842 to 140.059 MHz (Table SI), a spread of ~217 kHz against per-point total uncertainties of ~90-145 kHz. While the final weighted means agree with theory, the paper would benefit from a brief discussion of the source of this scatter and why the scatter does not undermine the final quoted values.
minor comments (6)
  1. Page 2, first paragraph: 'stuctures' should be 'structures'.
  2. Page 3, line describing the D2 ion core: the text states 'ortho-D2 (I=0,2)' but later refers to 'I=0' and 'I=2' components separately. The notation could be clarified for readers unfamiliar with the nuclear-spin symmetry species.
  3. Figure 2 caption: the line widths of 5 MHz are mentioned for the calculated spectra, but the experimental line widths are not stated. Including the experimental line width (or a range) would aid comparison.
  4. Table I: the theoretical value of c_e is cited as 39.5716 MHz from Ref. [53] (Korobov, Hilico, and Karr, 2006). It would be helpful to note whether more recent theoretical calculations exist, given the 20-year gap.
  5. The Supplemental Material reference [56] contains a placeholder URL '[url]' that should be replaced with the actual link upon publication.
  6. Page 5, last paragraph: the GK(2,2)-GK(0,2) interval of 42,639,437.7(9) MHz is mentioned as derived from a 'separate measurement' but no reference or further detail is given. A brief citation or description would be appropriate.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading of our manuscript and for the constructive comments. We agree with all three major comments and will revise the manuscript accordingly.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: The systematic uncertainties from the d-series quantum defects are load-bearing for the extracted values of b_F and c_e, but the methodology for computing these systematics is not described in this manuscript and is deferred to the companion paper (Ref. [49]). A brief summary of the methodology here would strengthen the paper's self-containedness.

    Authors: We agree that a brief summary of how the d-series quantum-defect systematic uncertainties are evaluated would improve the self-containedness of the manuscript. In the revised manuscript, we will add a concise paragraph (approximately 4-5 sentences) on page 5 summarizing the methodology: the systematic uncertainties arise from the limited precision of the d-series quantum defects, which are the most strongly coupled to the f series and the linear Stark manifolds. These uncertainties are propagated through the MQDT calculations by varying the d-series quantum defects within their experimentally determined confidence intervals and recording the resulting shifts in the fitted values of b_F and c_e. The resulting systematic uncertainty scales with n because the sensitivity of the Stark manifold positions to the d-series quantum defects increases with n, as reflected in the n-dependent error bar extensions in Fig. 4. We will also add an explicit cross-reference to Section [X] of Ref. [49] for readers seeking the full derivation. We note that the methodology and its results are fully documented in the companion paper; the addition here is purely for the reader's convenience. revision: yes

  2. Referee: Several individual fits exhibit weighted RMS values well above 1 (up to 4.570 for one D2 fit at n=34, F_z=697.9 mV/cm, and 4.095 for one H2 fit at n=43, F_z=897.7 mV/cm). The paper does not discuss these elevated RMS values or their potential implications for the final extracted parameters.

    Authors: The referee is correct that several individual fits have weighted RMS values significantly above 1, and we agree that the manuscript should comment on this. In the revised manuscript, we will add a brief discussion following the presentation of the fit results. The elevated RMS values arise from a combination of two factors: (1) residual model deficiencies, particularly in the treatment of line intensities (as already noted in the manuscript, saturation and lifetime broadening affect the low-frequency side of the spectra), and (2) the fact that the statistical uncertainties assigned to individual line positions are dominated by the frequency-comb calibration precision and line-center determination, which in some cases are smaller than the residual discrepancies between the MQDT model and the data. Importantly, the fitted parameters (b_F, c_e, ionization energies) are determined from the positions of many lines simultaneously, and the scatter of the individual fit results around the weighted mean (Fig. 4) is consistent with the error bars that include both statistical and systematic contributions. The final quoted uncertainties are derived from the scatter of the individual results, not from the individual fit chi-squares, so the elevated RMS values do not lead to underestimated final uncertainties. We will make this explicit in the revised text. revision: yes

  3. Referee: The n=43 H2 measurements show notable scatter in c_e, and the n=34 D2 measurements of b_F show a spread of ~217 kHz against per-point total uncertainties of ~90-145 kHz. The paper would benefit from a brief discussion of the source of this scatter and why it does not undermine the final quoted values.

    Authors: We agree that the scatter in the individual results, particularly at n=43 for H2 and n=34 for D2, warrants discussion. In the revised manuscript, we will add a comment addressing this point. The scatter at n=43 in H2 is primarily attributable to the increased systematic uncertainty from the d-series quantum defects at high n (350 kHz, as shown in Table SII), which reflects the growing sensitivity of the Stark manifold structure to the short-range quantum-defect parameters. The two n=43 measurements were taken at different field strengths (995.3 and 897.7 mV/cm), and the different Stark states probed at these fields have different sensitivities to the quantum-defect parameters, leading to the observed scatter. For the n=34 D2 measurements, the spread of ~217 kHz is larger than the per-point statistical uncertainties but is comparable to the systematic uncertainties (55 kHz per point) when combined with the field-dependent variations in the MQDT model accuracy. Crucially, the final values are determined as weighted means over all n values and field strengths (Fig. 4), and the quoted uncertainties are derived from the scatter of these individual results following the procedure described in Ref. [58]. The agreement of the final means with independent ab initio theory provides an additional cross-check. We will add this discussion in the context of the presentation of Fig. 4. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No significant circularity: experimental coupling constants are independently fitted from measured spectra and cross-checked against external ab initio theory.

full rationale

The paper extracts b_F, c_e, and the vibrational interval from least-squares fits of measured Rydberg-Stark spectral line positions to an MQDT + matrix-diagonalization model. The model's quantum defects and MQDT parameters come partly from the authors' own prior work (Ref. [49], a companion paper by the same group), which is a self-citation. However, this self-citation is not circular in the load-bearing sense: Ref. [49] describes the computational methodology (Hamiltonian construction, angular-momentum algebra, MQDT framework), not a fit to the same spectral data being analyzed here. The coupling constants b_F and c_e are genuine free parameters of the fits, not quantities defined in terms of themselves. Critically, the extracted values are compared against fully independent theoretical calculations from different author groups (Ref. [52] by Danev, Bakalov, Korobov, and Schiller; Ref. [53] by Korobov, Hilico, and Karr; Ref. [60] by Korobov, Hilico, and Karr), and the agreement (b_F: 139.84(5) vs 139.837(10) MHz; c_e: 39.62(11) vs 39.5716 MHz; vibrational interval: 47,279,980.8(1.9) vs 47,279,981.5898(12) MHz) provides external validation that is not self-referential. The systematic uncertainties from d-series quantum defects, while methodologically detailed in the companion paper, represent a model-completeness concern (correctness risk) rather than a circularity: the d-series quantum defects are not fitted to the target coupling constants and then used to predict those same constants. The two-step fit procedure (first fitting F_z and ionization energy from I=0 states, then fitting b_F from I=2 states with F_z held fixed) is a standard cascading fit, not a self-definitional loop. No step in the derivation chain reduces to its own inputs by construction.

Assumptions & free parameters 5 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The free parameters are the physically meaningful quantities extracted from the fits (coupling constants, field strengths, ionization energies). The axioms are standard domain assumptions in MQDT-based molecular spectroscopy. No new entities are postulated.

free parameters (5)
  • b_F (D₂⁺ v⁺=1, N⁺=0) = 139.84(5) MHz
    Fitted to D₂ Rydberg-Stark spectra; a central result of the paper.
  • c_e (H₂⁺ v⁺=1, N⁺=2) = 39.62(11) MHz
    Fitted to H₂ Rydberg-Stark spectra; a central result of the paper.
  • Electric field strength F_z (D₂) = 69.79(3) V/m (n=34 example)
    Fitted per measurement to match Stark state positions.
  • Electric field strength F_z (H₂) = 124.35(3) V/m (n=34 example)
    Fitted per measurement to match Stark state positions.
  • Ionization energies (D₂⁺ and H₂⁺ intervals) = 393,751,511.3(3) MHz and 401,128,310.3(3) MHz
    Fitted alongside coupling constants in the least-squares analysis.
assumptions (3)
  • domain assumption MQDT parameters and quantum defects for ℓ≤3 Rydberg states of H₂ and D₂ are accurately known from prior work.
    Used as fixed inputs in the matrix diagonalization; stated in the methods section describing Ĥ₀.
  • domain assumption The long-range interaction model for ℓ≥4 states correctly captures all relevant electrostatic and hyperfine interactions.
    Forms the basis of the zero-field Hamiltonian Ĥ₀ for high-ℓ states; referenced from Ref. [49].
  • domain assumption Transition intensities are proportional to the singlet f (S=0, ℓ=3) character of the Rydberg-Stark states.
    Stated in the text: 'the transition intensities are in good approximation proportional to the singlet f character.'

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Precision spectroscopy of the fine and hyperfine structures of high molecular Rydberg-Stark states: Metrology of molecular hydrogen ions." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/2RZLXBR6

@misc{pith2026260707636,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Precision spectroscopy of the fine and hyperfine structures of high molecular Rydberg-Stark states: Metrology of molecular hydrogen ions},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/2RZLXBR6}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.07636}
}
abstract

The Stark effect in autoionizing high-$n$ Rydberg states decouples the Rydberg electron from the ion core through $\ell$ mixing with core-nonpenetrating high-$\ell$ states. The Rydberg states become long-lived, which is ideal for precision spectroscopy, and their structures reflect the fine and hyperfine structures of the ion-core levels. We report on precision measurements, in weak electric fields, of the fine and hyperfine structures of two distinct categories of high autoionizing molecular Rydberg-Stark states differing by the nature of the ion-core angular momentum: Rydberg states of para-H$_2$ (total nuclear spin $I=0$) with a rotationally excited ($N^+=2$) H$_2^+$ ion core and Rydberg states of ortho-D$_2$ ($I=2$) with a rotationless ($N^+=0$) ion core. The spectra reveal striking differences which are interpreted as arising from the dominance of anisotropic charge-quadrupole interactions between the rotating quadrupolar ion core and the Rydberg electron in para-H$_2$ and the absence of such interactions in rotationless ortho-D$_2$ Rydberg states. In ortho-D$_2$, the dominant interaction, the magnetic Fermi-contact hyperfine interaction in the ion core, does not significantly affect the motion of the Rydberg electron. By analyzing these spectra based on a treatment combining multichannel quantum-defect theory and matrix diagonalization, we derive new experimental values of the hyperfine coupling constant $b_F$ = 139.84(5) MHz of D$_2^+ (v^+=1, N^+=0)$, the spin-rotation coupling constant $c_e$ = 39.62(11) MHz of H$_2^+ (v^+=1, N^+=2)$ and the fundamental vibrational interval of ortho-D$_2^+$ (47279980.8(1.9) MHz). The approach followed here in the study of molecular Rydberg-Stark states is general and broadly applicable to measurements of the fine and hyperfine structures of molecular cations.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.07636 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Schematic illustration of the salient features of the Stark effect in Rydberg states of (a) the H atom with a point-like [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Measured spectra of the n = 34 [a: D+ 2 X +(1,0) and b: H+ 2 X +(1,2)] Rydberg-Stark manifolds at electric fields of 69.79 and 124.35 V/m, respectively, as determined from fits, and calculated spectra (inverted traces) assuming line widths of 5 MHz for all lines. Selected spectral regions [delimited by dashed lines in panels (i)] are enlarged in panels (ii). See text. quadrupolar and polarizable molecular ion core. … view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Spectra of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Panels a(i) [b(i)]: Residuals of the fitted hyper [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

63 extracted references · 63 canonical work pages

  1. [49]

    Giannakeas, C

    P. Giannakeas, C. H. Greene, and F. Robicheaux, Gen- eralized local-frame-transformation theory for excited species in external fields, Phys. Rev. A94, 013419 (2016)

    work page 2016

  2. [1]

    (Fig. 1c). The top part of Fig. 1 illustrates the in- teraction of the Rydberg electron with (a) a proton, (b) a nonrotating (i.e., spherically symmetric) quadrupolar and polarizable molecular ion core, and (c) a rotating 3 Figure 2. Measured spectra of then= 34 [a: D + 2 X+(1,0) and b: H + 2 X+(1,2)] Rydberg-Stark manifolds at electric fields of 69.79 an...

    work page

  3. [2]

    These systems were also ideal to demonstrate the pos- sibility of precisely determining the fine and hyperfine structures of molecular ions from Rydberg-Stark spectra

    and enabled the observation of phenomena not an- ticipated at the outset of the investigation: (i) strikingly different spectral patterns in H 2 and D 2, which could be interpreted during the analysis, and (ii) different au- toionization dynamics of different hyperfine components of specific Stark states in D2, which remains unexplained. These systems wer...

    work page doi:10.13039/100019599

  4. [3]

    T. F. Gallagher,Rydberg Atoms, edited by A. Dalgarno, P. L. Knight, F. H. Read, and R. N. Zare, Cambridge Monographs on Atomic, Molecular and Chemical Physics (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1994)

    work page 1994

  5. [4]

    R. F. Stebbings and F. B. Dunning,Rydberg States of Atoms and Molecules(Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1983)

    work page 1983

  6. [5]

    Germann, S

    M. Germann, S. Patra, J.-Ph. Karr, L. Hilico, V. I. Ko- robov, E. J. Salumbides, K. S. E. Eikema, W. Ubachs, and J. C. J. Koelemeij, Three-body QED test and fifth- force constraint from vibrations and rotations of HD +, Phys. Rev. Research3, L022028 (2021)

    work page 2021

  7. [6]

    Delaunay, J.-P

    C. Delaunay, J.-P. Karr, T. Kitahara, J. C. J. Koele- meij, Y. Soreq, and J. Zupan, Self-consistent extraction of spectroscopic bounds on light new physics, Phys. Rev. Lett.130, 121801 (2023)

    work page 2023

  8. [7]

    V. I. Korobov, J.-P. Karr, and Z.-X. Zhong, Second-order corrections of orders mα 6 and mα 6(m/M) to the spin- averaged energy in the HD + and H 2 + ions, Molecular Physics , e2563023 (2025)

    work page 2025

Show all 63 references
  1. [8]

    Alighanbari, M

    S. Alighanbari, M. R. Schenkel, V. I. Korobov, and S. Schiller, High-accuracy laser spectroscopy of H + 2 and the proton–electron mass ratio, Nature644, 69 (2025)

    2025

  2. [9]

    Schiller and J.-P

    S. Schiller and J.-P. Karr, Prospects for the determi- nation of fundamental constants with beyond-state-of- the-art uncertainty using molecular hydrogen ion spec- troscopy, Phys. Rev. A109, 042825 (2024)

    2024

  3. [10]

    Puchalski, J

    M. Puchalski, J. Komasa, P. Czachorowski, and K. Pachucki, Nonadiabatic QED correction to the dis- sociation energy of the hydrogen molecule, Phys. Rev. Lett.122, 103003 (2019)

    2019

  4. [11]

    H¨ olsch, M

    N. H¨ olsch, M. Beyer, E. J. Salumbides, K. S. E. Eikema, W. Ubachs, Ch. Jungen, and F. Merkt, Benchmarking theory with an improved measurement of the ionization and dissociation energies of H 2, Phys. Rev. Lett.122, 103002 (2019)

    2019

  5. [12]

    Patk´ oˇ s, V

    V. Patk´ oˇ s, V. A. Yerokhin, and K. Pachucki, Complete α7mLamb shift of helium triplet states, Phys. Rev. A 103, 042809 (2021)

    2021

  6. [13]

    Clausen and F

    G. Clausen and F. Merkt, Ionization energy of metastable 3He (2 3S1) and the alpha- and helion-particle charge- radius difference from precision spectroscopy of thenp Rydberg series, Phys. Rev. Lett.134, 223001 (2025)

    2025

  7. [14]

    P. J. Mohr, D. B. Newell, B. N. Taylor, and E. Tiesinga, CODATA recommended values of the fundamental phys- ical constants: 2022, Rev. Mod. Phys97, 025002 (2025)

    2022

  8. [15]

    Facon, E.-K

    A. Facon, E.-K. Dietsche, D. Grosso, S. Haroche, J.-M. Raimond, M. Brune, and S. Gleyzes, A sensitive elec- trometer based on a Rydberg atom in a Schr¨ odinger–cat state, Nature535, 262 (2016)

    2016

  9. [16]

    Zhang, Y

    H. Zhang, Y. Ma, K. Liao, W. Yang, Z. Liu, D. Ding, H. Yan, W. Li, and L. Zhang, Rydberg atom electric field sensing for metrology, communication and hybrid quantum systems, Science Bulletin69, 1515 (2024)

    2024

  10. [17]

    Liang, C

    C. Liang, C. Yang, W. Huang, and L. You, Exceptional Point-enhanced Rydberg Atomic Electrometers (2026), arXiv:2506.12861

    2026

  11. [18]

    Nipper, J

    J. Nipper, J. B. Balewski, A. T. Krupp, B. Butscher, R. L¨ ow, and T. Pfau, Highly resolved measurements of Stark-tuned F¨ orster resonances between Rydberg atoms, Phys. Rev. Lett.108, 113001 (2012)

    2012

  12. [19]

    Weber, C

    S. Weber, C. Tresp, H. Menke, A. Urvoy, O. Firsten- berg, H. P. B¨ uchler, and S. Hofferberth, Calculation of Rydberg interaction potentials, J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys.50, 133001 (2017)

    2017

  13. [20]

    Stecker, R

    M. Stecker, R. Nold, L.-M. Steinert, J. Grimmel, D. Pet- rosyan, J. Fort´ agh, and A. G¨ unther, Controlling the Dipole Blockade and Ionization Rate of Rydberg Atoms in Strong Electric Fields, Phys. Rev. Lett.125, 103602 (2020)

    2020

  14. [21]

    Y. Jiao, J. Bai, R. Song, S. Bao, J. Zhao, and S. Jia, Electric field tuned dipolar interaction between Rydberg atoms, Frontiers in Physics10(2022)

    2022

  15. [22]

    M´ ehaignerie, Y

    P. M´ ehaignerie, Y. Machu, A. Dur´ an Hern´ andez, G. Creutzer, D. Papoular, J.-M. Raimond, C. Sayrin, and M. Brune, Interacting Circular Rydberg Atoms Trapped in Optical Tweezers, PRX Quantum6

  16. [23]

    Peper, Y

    M. Peper, Y. Li, D. Y. Knapp, M. Bileska, S. Ma, G. Liu, P. Peng, B. Zhang, S. P. Horvath, A. P. Burgers, and J. D. Thompson, Spectroscopy and Modeling of 171Yb Ryd- berg States for High-Fidelity Two-Qubit Gates, Phys. Rev. X15, 011009 (2025)

    2025

  17. [24]

    H. A. Bethe and E. E. Salpeter,Quantum Mechanics of One- and Two-Electron Atoms(Springer, Berlin, 1957)

    1957

  18. [25]

    Doran, N

    I. Doran, N. H¨ olsch, M. Beyer, and F. Merkt, Zero- quantum-defect method and the fundamental vibrational interval of H+ 2 , Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 073001 (2024)

    2024

  19. [26]

    M. L. Zimmerman, M. G. Littman, M. M. Kash, and D. Kleppner, Stark structure of the Rydberg states of alkali-metal atoms, Phys. Rev. A20, 2251 (1979)

    1979

  20. [27]

    Grimmel, M

    J. Grimmel, M. Mack, F. Karlewski, F. Jessen, M. Rein- schmidt, N. S´ andor, and J. Fort´ agh, Measurement and numerical calculation of rubidium Rydberg Stark spec- tra, New J. Phys.17, 053005 (2015)

    2015

  21. [28]

    ˇSibali´ c, J

    N. ˇSibali´ c, J. D. Pritchard, C. S. Adams, and K. J. Weatherill, ARC: An open-source library for calculating properties of alkali Rydberg atoms, Comput. Phys. Com- mun.220, 319 (2017)

    2017

  22. [29]

    Peper, F

    M. Peper, F. Helmrich, J. Butscher, J. A. Agner, H. Schmutz, F. Merkt, and J. Deiglmayr, Precision mea- surement of the ionization energy and quantum defects of 39Ki, Phys. Rev. A100, 012501 (2019)

    2019

  23. [30]

    Scheidegger, J

    S. Scheidegger, J. A. Agner, H. Schmutz, and F. Merkt, Metrology of Rydberg states of the hydrogen atom, Phys. Rev. A108, 042803 (2023)

    2023

  24. [31]

    W. E. Ernst, T. P. Softley, and R. N. Zare, Stark-effect studies in xenon autoionizing Rydberg states using a tun- able extreme-ultraviolet laser source, Phys. Rev. A37, 4172 (1988). 7

    1988

  25. [32]

    P. F. Brevet, M. Pellarin, and J. L. Vialle, Stark effect in argon Rydberg states, Phys. Rev. A42, 1460 (1990)

    1990

  26. [33]

    H. H. Fielding and T. P. Softley, Observation of the Stark effect in autoionizing Rydberg states of Ar with a mul- tichannel quantum-defect analysis, J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys.25, 4125 (1992)

    1992

  27. [34]

    M. J. J. Vrakking, Role of core interactions and external perturbations in the autoionization of Xe, J. Phys. Chem. A101, 6761 (1997)

    1997

  28. [35]

    Bordas, M

    C. Bordas, M. Broyer, J. Chevaleyre, and P. Labastie, Laser Stark spectroscopy of molecular Rydberg states, J. Phys. Colloques48, 647 (1987)

    1987

  29. [36]

    Bordas and H

    C. Bordas and H. Helm, Stark effect in triatomic hydro- gen Rydberg states, Phys. Rev. A45, 387 (1992)

    1992

  30. [37]

    H. H. Fielding, T. P. Softley, and F. Merkt, Photoion- ization and ZEKE photoelectron spectroscopy of Ar, H 2 and CO2 using a coherent XUV laser source, Chem. Phys. 155, 257 (1991)

    1991

  31. [38]

    M. J. J. Vrakking, Lifetimes of Rydberg states in ZEKE experiments. III. Calculations of the dc electric field de- pendence of predissociation lifetimes of NO, J. Chem. Phys.105, 7336 (1996)

    1996

  32. [39]

    Seiler, S

    Ch. Seiler, S. D. Hogan, and F. Merkt, Trapping cold molecular hydrogen, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys.13, 19000 (2011)

    2011

  33. [40]

    M. H. Rayment and S. D. Hogan, Quantum-state- dependent decay rates of electrostatically trapped Ryd- berg NO molecules, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys.23, 18806 (2021)

    2021

  34. [41]

    Munkes, M

    F. Munkes, M. H. Rayment, A. Trachtmann, F. An- sch¨ utz, E. Eder, P. Hengel, Y. Schellander, P. Schal- berger, N. Fruehauf, J. Anders, R. L¨ ow, T. Pfau, S. D. Hogan, and H. K¨ ubler, High-resolution Continuous-Wave Laser Spectroscopy of Long-Lived Rydberg States in NO, The J...

    2024

  35. [42]

    D. A. Harmin, Hydrogenic Stark effect: Properties of the wave functions, Phys. Rev. A24, 2491 (1981)

    1981

  36. [43]

    D. A. Harmin, Analytical study of quasidiscrete Stark levels in Rydberg atoms, Phys. Rev. A30, 2413 (1984)

    1984

  37. [44]

    Sakimoto, Multichannel quantum-defect theory of the Stark effect, J

    K. Sakimoto, Multichannel quantum-defect theory of the Stark effect, J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Phys.19, 3011 (1986)

    1986

  38. [45]

    Sakimoto, Influence of electric fields on highly excited states of H 2: Quantum-defect-theory approach, J

    K. Sakimoto, Influence of electric fields on highly excited states of H 2: Quantum-defect-theory approach, J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys.22, 2727 (1989)

    1989

  39. [46]

    H. H. Fielding and T. P. Softley, Observation of the Stark effect in autoionising Rydberg states of molecular hydro- gen, Chem. Phys. Lett.185, 199 (1991)

    1991

  40. [47]

    T. P. Softley, A. J. Hudson, and R. Watson, Multichan- nel quantum defect theory Stark effect calculation of au- toionization lifetimes in high-nRydberg states of Ar, N 2 and H2, J. Chem. Phys.106, 1041 (1997)

    1997

  41. [48]

    Gr¨ utter, O

    M. Gr¨ utter, O. Zehnder, T. P. Softley, and F. Merkt, Spectroscopic study and multichannel quantum defect theory analysis of the Stark effect in Rydberg states of neon, J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys.41, 115001 (2008)

    2008

  42. [50]

    Jungen and G

    Ch. Jungen and G. Raseev, Spin-electronic-rotational frame transformation for photoionization and Rydberg spectra of diatomic molecules, Phys. Rev. A57, 2407 (1998)

    1998

  43. [51]

    Doran, L

    I. Doran, L. Jeckel, M. Beyer, Ch. Jungen, and F. Merkt, The Stark effect in molecular Rydberg states: Calcula- tion of Rydberg-Stark manifolds of H 2 and D2 including fine and hyperfine structures (2026), arXiv:2602.17511 [physics.atom-ph]

    2026 arXiv

  44. [52]

    Jungen,Molecular Applications of Quantum De- fect Theory(Institute of Physics Publishing, Bristol and Philadelphia, 1996)

    Ch. Jungen,Molecular Applications of Quantum De- fect Theory(Institute of Physics Publishing, Bristol and Philadelphia, 1996)

    1996

  45. [53]

    Jungen, Elements of quantum defect theory, inHand- book of High-Resolution Spectroscopy, Vol

    Ch. Jungen, Elements of quantum defect theory, inHand- book of High-Resolution Spectroscopy, Vol. 1, edited by M. Quack and F. Merkt (John Wiley & Sons, Chichester,

  46. [54]

    Danev, D

    P. Danev, D. Bakalov, V. I. Korobov, and S. Schiller, Hy- perfine structure and electric quadrupole transitions in the deuterium molecular ion, Phys. Rev. A103, 012805 (2021)

    2021

  47. [55]

    V. I. Korobov, L. Hilico, and J.-Ph. Karr, Hyperfine structure in the hydrogen molecular ion, Phys. Rev. A 74, 040502(R) (2006)

    2006

  48. [56]

    H¨ olsch, I

    N. H¨ olsch, I. Doran, M. Beyer, and F. Merkt, Preci- sion millimetre-wave spectroscopy and calculation of the Stark manifolds in high Rydberg states of para-H 2, J. Mol. Spectrosc.387, 111648 (2022)

    2022

  49. [57]

    Beyer, N

    M. Beyer, N. H¨ olsch, J. A. Agner, J. Deiglmayr, H. Schmutz, and F. Merkt, Metrology of high-nRyd- berg states of molecular hydrogen with ∆ν/ν=2×10 −10 accuracy, Phys. Rev. A97, 012501 (2018)

    2018

  50. [58]

    See Supplemental Material [url] for the results of indi- vidual fits of Rydberg-Stark manifolds and typical error budgets

  51. [59]

    Tiesinga, P

    E. Tiesinga, P. J. Mohr, D. B. Newell, and B. N. Tay- lor, CODATA recommended values of the fundamental physical constants: 2018, Rev. Mod. Phys.93, 025010 (2021)

    2018

  52. [60]

    Meister,Grundpraktikum Physikalische Chemie: The- orie und Experimente(vdf, Hochschul-Verlag an der ETH, Z¨ urich, 2000)

    E. Meister,Grundpraktikum Physikalische Chemie: The- orie und Experimente(vdf, Hochschul-Verlag an der ETH, Z¨ urich, 2000)

    2000

  53. [61]

    Hussels, N

    J. Hussels, N. H¨ olsch, C.-F. Cheng, E. J. Salumbides, H. L. Bethlem, K. S. E. Eikema, Ch. Jungen, M. Beyer, F. Merkt, and W. Ubachs, Improved ionization and dis- sociation energies of the deuterium molecule, Phys. Rev. A105, 022820 (2022)

    2022

  54. [62]

    V. I. Korobov, L. Hilico, and J.-Ph. Karr, Fundamental transitions and ionization energies of the hydrogen molec- ular ions with few ppt uncertainty, Phys. Rev. Lett.118, 233001 (2017)

    2017

  55. [63]

    H. A. Cruse, Ch. Jungen, and F. Merkt, Hyperfine struc- ture of the ground state of para-D + 2 by high-resolution Rydberg-state spectroscopy and multichannel quantum defect theory, Phys. Rev. A77, 042502 (2008). 8 SUPPLEMENT AL MA TERIAL This supplemental material provides inf...

    2008

Pith tools

Reviewed July 9, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.