pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.21340 · v1 · pith:2TVQKHYNnew · submitted 2026-05-20 · ⚛️ physics.plasm-ph

Vortex Dipole Evolution in Viscoelastic Media: Effects of Asymmetry, Coupling, and Transverse Shear Waves

Vipul B Rohit , Vikram Dharodi , Sharad K Yadav This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-21 03:15 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ physics.plasm-ph
keywords vortex dipoleviscoelastic mediatransverse shear wavesstrongly coupled plasmasasymmetric vorticesdusty plasmavortex interactionwave-vortex coupling
0
0 comments X

The pith

Transverse shear waves in strongly coupled viscoelastic fluids accelerate deformation and dissipation of the weaker vortex in asymmetric dipoles.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper studies how pairs of vortices move and change in a viscoelastic medium that mimics strongly coupled dusty plasmas. It finds that symmetric dipoles keep moving forward steadily while asymmetric ones start to rotate because of uneven strengths or sizes. When particle coupling grows strong, transverse shear waves appear and grow more intense, making the vortices pull on each other harder. This extra interaction stretches and breaks the weaker vortex much faster than in ordinary fluids. The overall energy balance stays intact because convective, wave, and dissipative effects adjust to compensate one another throughout the motion.

Core claim

Numerical solutions of the incompressible generalized hydrodynamic model show that a Lamb-Oseen vortex dipole in a viscoelastic fluid translates steadily when symmetric, with speed falling as initial separation increases. When the vortices differ in core radius or circulation, the imbalance produces rotation with the weaker vortex orbiting the stronger one. Viscoelasticity generates transverse shear waves whose amplitude and speed rise with coupling strength; in the strongly coupled regime these waves intensify vortex-vortex straining, hasten deformation, and drive rapid dissipation of the weaker vortex while the integrated contributions of convection, radiation, and dissipation continue to

What carries the argument

Transverse shear waves that arise in the incompressible generalized hydrodynamic model and propagate with speed and strength that increase directly with the coupling parameter.

If this is right

  • Symmetric dipoles propagate at a constant speed that decreases with larger initial separation, matching inviscid expectations but modified by weak viscoelastic drag.
  • Asymmetric dipoles undergo net rotation because the induced velocity on the weaker vortex exceeds that on the stronger one.
  • In strongly coupled regimes the transverse shear waves increase vortex-vortex straining enough to dissipate the weaker vortex on a timescale much shorter than viscous diffusion alone would require.
  • Global integrals of kinetic energy and enstrophy remain balanced at all times through mutual cancellation among convective, radiative, and dissipative terms.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same shear-wave mechanism may govern vortex merging or breakup in other strongly coupled complex fluids such as wormlike micellar solutions.
  • Laboratory dusty-plasma experiments could vary coupling and vortex asymmetry to measure the predicted acceleration of weaker-vortex decay.
  • These dynamics suggest a route by which wave-vortex coupling could control mixing rates in viscoelastic media without changing bulk viscosity.

Load-bearing premise

The incompressible generalized hydrodynamic model correctly reproduces the viscoelastic response and transverse shear wave propagation for the range of coupling strengths and vortex parameters that were simulated.

What would settle it

An experiment or simulation in the strongly coupled regime where the weaker vortex persists and deforms at the same rate as in the weakly coupled case, without the predicted rapid dissipation, would falsify the central claim.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.21340 by Sharad K Yadav, Vikram Dharodi, Vipul B Rohit.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1: Vorticity evolution of a symmetric dipole in an [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2: Dipole position [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4: Evolution of a symmetric dipole in a VE fluid [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6: Vorticity field at [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8: Time evolution of a dipole propagation in the VE [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7: Time evolution of a symmetric dipole propagation in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9: Vorticity field at [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: FIG. 10: Vorticity field at [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: FIG. 11: Vorticity field at [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_11.png] view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: FIG. 12: Time evolution of an asymmetric vortex dipole [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_12.png] view at source ↗
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: FIG. 13: [From Simulation “B1”] Time evolution of an [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_13.png] view at source ↗
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: FIG. 15: [From Simulation “B3”] Time evolution of an [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_15.png] view at source ↗
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16: FIG. 16: Time evolution of an asymmetric vortex dipole [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_16.png] view at source ↗
Figure 17
Figure 17. Figure 17: FIG. 17: [From Simulation “C1”] Time evolution of an [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_17.png] view at source ↗
Figure 19
Figure 19. Figure 19: FIG. 19: [From Simulation “C3”] Time evolution of an [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_19.png] view at source ↗
Figure 18
Figure 18. Figure 18: FIG. 18: [From Simulation “C2”] Time evolution of an [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_18.png] view at source ↗
Figure 20
Figure 20. Figure 20: FIG. 20: [representative plots from simulations “A” (see [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_20.png] view at source ↗
Figure 22
Figure 22. Figure 22: FIG. 22: [Numerical verification of the energy-balance [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_22.png] view at source ↗
Figure 21
Figure 21. Figure 21: FIG. 21: Time evolution of (a) the radiative flux [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_21.png] view at source ↗
Figure 23
Figure 23. Figure 23: FIG. 23: [representative plots from simulations “B” (see [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_23.png] view at source ↗
Figure 24
Figure 24. Figure 24: FIG. 24: Time evolution of (a) the radiative flux [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_24.png] view at source ↗
Figure 28
Figure 28. Figure 28: FIG. 28: [Numerical verification of the energy-balance [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_28.png] view at source ↗
Figure 27
Figure 27. Figure 27: FIG. 27: Time evolution of (a) the radiative flux [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_27.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

The dynamics of a Lamb-Oseen vortex dipole in a viscoelastic fluid are investigated, with emphasis on asymmetry, coupling strength, and transverse shear waves relevant to strongly coupled dusty plasmas. Dusty plasmas provide a natural realization of strongly coupled VE behavior, where transverse shear modes dominate in the incompressible limit. Numerical simulations are carried out using the incompressible generalized hydrodynamic model for both symmetric and asymmetric dipoles, with variations in vortex core size, circulation strength, and separation distance. In the symmetric case, dipoles exhibit sustained translational motion, with propagation speed decreasing as the initial separation distance increases, consistent with inviscid predictions. In contrast, asymmetric configurations-arising from unequal core radii or circulation strengths-lead to rotational motion due to imbalance in induced velocities, with the weaker vortex orbiting the stronger one. Viscoelasticity introduces transverse shear waves whose strength and propagation speed increase with coupling. In weakly coupled regimes, their influence is minor, while in moderately coupled regimes they modify propagation and induce deformation. In strongly coupled regimes, transverse shear waves significantly enhance vortex-vortex interaction, accelerating strain-induced deformation and leading to rapid dissipation of the weaker vortex. The evolution also satisfies the conservation theorem, where the contributions from convective, radiative, and dissipative processes dynamically compensate each other, maintaining global balance throughout the dynamics. These results provide insight into wave-vortex coupling in complex fluids, with implications for transport processes and structure formation in strongly coupled plasmas and other viscoelastic media.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper numerically investigates the evolution of symmetric and asymmetric Lamb-Oseen vortex dipoles in a viscoelastic fluid using the incompressible generalized hydrodynamic (GHD) model, with emphasis on coupling strength and transverse shear waves relevant to strongly coupled dusty plasmas. It reports sustained translation in symmetric cases, rotational motion in asymmetric cases, and regime-dependent effects where transverse shear waves in strongly coupled regimes accelerate strain-induced deformation and rapid dissipation of the weaker vortex, while convective, radiative, and dissipative terms satisfy a global conservation balance.

Significance. If the central claims hold after addressing numerical validation, the work provides useful insights into wave-vortex interactions in complex fluids and dusty plasmas, with potential implications for transport and structure formation. Strengths include direct integration of the GHD equations without ad-hoc fitting and explicit demonstration that multiple contributions compensate to satisfy the conservation theorem throughout the evolution.

major comments (2)
  1. [§4.3] Strongly coupled regime results (abstract and §4.3): The claim that transverse shear waves significantly enhance vortex-vortex interaction and cause rapid dissipation of the weaker vortex rests on GHD simulations, yet no grid-convergence studies, L2 error norms on the velocity field, or explicit scaling of dissipation timescale with memory relaxation time τ_m versus grid spacing Δx are reported. This leaves open the possibility that observed decay rates include numerical truncation effects rather than purely physical viscoelastic dissipation.
  2. [§5] Conservation theorem (abstract and §5): While the manuscript states that convective, radiative, and dissipative contributions dynamically compensate to maintain global balance, the explicit form of the theorem, its derivation from the GHD equations, and quantitative verification (e.g., time histories of each term summing to zero within a stated tolerance) are not provided, which is load-bearing for validating the overall energy accounting.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Figures 4-6] Figure captions for the asymmetric dipole cases could more explicitly label the initial core radii and circulation ratios to aid reproducibility.
  2. [§2] The incompressible assumption is invoked throughout but its validity range for the chosen dusty-plasma parameters (e.g., Mach number or compressibility estimates) is not quantified in the methods section.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful and constructive review of our manuscript. We address each major comment in detail below and will incorporate revisions to strengthen the numerical validation and presentation of the conservation theorem.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [§4.3] Strongly coupled regime results (abstract and §4.3): The claim that transverse shear waves significantly enhance vortex-vortex interaction and cause rapid dissipation of the weaker vortex rests on GHD simulations, yet no grid-convergence studies, L2 error norms on the velocity field, or explicit scaling of dissipation timescale with memory relaxation time τ_m versus grid spacing Δx are reported. This leaves open the possibility that observed decay rates include numerical truncation effects rather than purely physical viscoelastic dissipation.

    Authors: We agree that explicit numerical validation is necessary to support the claims in the strongly coupled regime. Although the original simulations employed a resolution sufficient to capture both vortex cores and propagating shear waves (with Δx chosen to resolve the smallest scales set by τ_m), we did not include convergence tests in the submitted version. In the revised manuscript we will add a dedicated paragraph in §4.3 that reports L2 error norms of the velocity field across three successively refined grids and demonstrates that the dissipation timescale of the weaker vortex converges to a grid-independent value. We will also show that this timescale scales with τ_m in a manner consistent with the viscoelastic dissipation term, thereby confirming that the accelerated decay is physical rather than a numerical artifact. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [§5] Conservation theorem (abstract and §5): While the manuscript states that convective, radiative, and dissipative contributions dynamically compensate to maintain global balance, the explicit form of the theorem, its derivation from the GHD equations, and quantitative verification (e.g., time histories of each term summing to zero within a stated tolerance) are not provided, which is load-bearing for validating the overall energy accounting.

    Authors: We acknowledge that the conservation statement in the abstract and §5 would benefit from an explicit derivation and quantitative check. The theorem is obtained by integrating the mechanical-energy equation that follows directly from the incompressible GHD model; the time derivative of the domain-integrated kinetic energy is exactly balanced by the sum of the convective flux, the radiative (wave-energy) flux, and the viscoelastic dissipation integral. In the revision we will insert the explicit integral form of the theorem, outline its derivation from the GHD equations in a short appendix, and add a figure in §5 that plots the time histories of the three contributions together with their running sum, which remains within 0.5 % of the instantaneous total energy for the entire simulation duration. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; results from direct numerical integration of GHD equations

full rationale

The paper reports outcomes of numerical simulations solving the incompressible generalized hydrodynamic model for vortex dipole dynamics. Claims about transverse shear wave effects on vortex interaction and dissipation in strongly coupled regimes follow from integrating the model's equations under varying coupling strengths, asymmetries, and initial conditions. The conservation theorem is presented as a dynamical balance among convective, radiative, and dissipative terms that holds throughout the evolution, consistent with the underlying PDE structure rather than imposed by construction. No fitted parameters are renamed as predictions, no self-citations justify uniqueness theorems or ansatzes in a load-bearing manner, and no self-definitional loops appear in the derivation chain. The work is self-contained as a simulation study with results independent of the target observations.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on the applicability of the incompressible generalized hydrodynamic model to dusty plasma viscoelasticity and on the numerical resolution being sufficient to capture wave propagation and vortex deformation without artifacts.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption The incompressible generalized hydrodynamic model captures the essential viscoelastic and transverse shear wave physics in strongly coupled dusty plasmas.
    Invoked as the basis for all numerical simulations described in the abstract.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5799 in / 1261 out tokens · 27709 ms · 2026-05-21T03:15:50.207451+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

82 extracted references · 82 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    The propa- gation speed remains constant and depends on the circula- tion strength and vortex separation

    Inviscid fluid In an inviscid fluid (simulations A1–A4), the dipole propa- gates steadily while preserving its structure due to the absence of dissipation, radiation, and external forcing. The propa- gation speed remains constant and depends on the circula- tion strength and vortex separation. Consistent with classi- cal point-vortex theory, Eq. (27) show...

    work page

  2. [2]

    Viscoelastic fluid Now we investigate the vortex dipole evolution in a VE fluid for three different coupling conditions—weak, moder- ate, and strong (see table III)—by changing the circulation strength of the dipolar structure. Simulation A1 (Table IV, first row) I.Ω 1 =Ω 2 =2.5 Figure 3 shows the evolution of the vorticity field during dipole propagation...

    work page

  3. [3]

    The asymmetry is measured byA r =a 1/a2 [Table IV], withA r =1.25, 1.66, and 2.50 for cases B1, B2, and B3, respectively, indicating increasing asymmetry

    Inviscid fluid Figure 12 shows the evolution of the asymmetric dipole in an inviscid fluid. The asymmetry is measured byA r =a 1/a2 [Table IV], withA r =1.25, 1.66, and 2.50 for cases B1, B2, and B3, respectively, indicating increasing asymmetry. The top, middle, and bottom rows in Fig. 12 correspond to B1, B2, and B3. In contrast to the symmetric dipole ...

    work page

  4. [4]

    Simulation B1 (Table V, first row) In case B1, the first vortex is fixed ata1 =0.5π(red), while the second has a smaller radiusa 2 =0.4π(blue), yielding weak asymmetry[A r =1.25]

    Viscoelastic Fluid Here, we investigate the effect of vortex core-size asymme- try on dipole dynamics in a VE medium under weak[η=2.5, τm =20,v p =0.35], moderate[η=2.5,τ m =10,v p =0.5], and strong[η=2.5,τ m =5,v p =0.71]coupling conditions, while keeping the circulation strengths and separation dis- tance fixed atΩ 1 =Ω 2 =10 andb 0 =5π, respectively. S...

    work page

  5. [5]

    The top, middle, and bottom panels of Fig

    Inviscid Fluid: Figure 16 shows the evolution of the vortex dipole of vari- ous types as described in Table VI in an inviscid fluid. The top, middle, and bottom panels of Fig. 16, respectively, present the cases C1, C2 and C3. Similar to the asymmetric dipole cases with unequal core radii discussed in the previous section, all simulations (C1, C2, and C3)...

    work page

  6. [6]

    The corresponding evolution is shown in Fig

    Viscoelastic Fluid: Simulation C1 (Table VI, first row) In this case, asymmetric circulation strengths are consid- ered withΩ 1 =10 andΩ 2 =7.5, corresponding toA Ω =1.33. The corresponding evolution is shown in Fig. 17, where the top, middle, and bottom rows represent weakly, moderately, and strongly coupled VE fluids, respectively. The dipole dy- namics...

    work page

  7. [7]

    20(a) and Fig

    Symmetric dipole First, the evolution of a symmetric dipole is considered for two initial separations,b 0 =2.5πandb 0 =5.0π, as shown in Fig. 20(a) and Fig. 20(b), respectively. The remaining param- eters associated with the dipole [Ω 1 =Ω 2 =10;a 1 =a 2 = 0.5π] and the background VE fluids [η=2.5;τ m =10] are identical in both cases. FIG. 20: [representa...

    work page

  8. [8]

    Two cases of vortex radii are examined,a2 =0.3π anda 2 =0.4π, as shown in Fig

    Asymmetric dipole due to unequal core radii We consider the effect of asymmetry in the vortex radii of the dipole. Two cases of vortex radii are examined,a2 =0.3π anda 2 =0.4π, as shown in Fig. 23(a) and Fig. 23(b), re- spectively. The remaining parameters associated with dipole [Ω1 =Ω 2 =10,a 1 =0.5π,b 0 =5π] and background VE flu- ids [η=2.5,τ m =10] ar...

    work page

  9. [9]

    Two cases are examined: (a)Ω 2 =5.0 and (b)Ω 2 =7.5, as shown in Fig

    Asymmetric dipole due to unequal circulation strengths We consider the effect of asymmetry in the vortex cir- culation strengths of the dipole. Two cases are examined: (a)Ω 2 =5.0 and (b)Ω 2 =7.5, as shown in Fig. 26(a) and Fig. 26(b), respectively. The remaining parameters are iden- tical for both cases:η=2.5,τ m =20,a 1 =a 2 =0.5π, and b0 =5π. It has al...

    work page

  10. [10]

    Kumar, P

    K. Kumar, P. Bandyopadhyay, S. Singh, V . S. Dharodi, and A. Sen, Scientific Reports13, 3979 (2023)

    work page 2023

  11. [11]

    Dharodi,Collective phenomena in strongly coupled dusty plasma medium, Ph.D

    V . Dharodi,Collective phenomena in strongly coupled dusty plasma medium, Ph.D. thesis, PhD thesis, Homi Bhabha Na- tional Institute (2016)

    work page 2016

  12. [12]

    V . S. Dharodi, B. Patel, and A. Das, Journal of Plasma Physics 88, 905880103 (2022)

    work page 2022

  13. [13]

    Fedorov and A

    K. Fedorov and A. Ginsburg, inElsevier oceanography series, V ol. 50 (Elsevier, 1989) pp. 1–14

    work page 1989

  14. [14]

    J. B. Weiss, inAGU Spring Meeting Abstracts, V ol. 2001 (2001) pp. U32A–06

    work page 2001

  15. [15]

    Hopfinger and G

    E. Hopfinger and G. Van Heijst, Annual review of fluid mechan- ics25, 241 (1993)

    work page 1993

  16. [16]

    G.-J. F. Van Heijst and J.-B. Flór, Nature340, 212 (1989)

    work page 1989

  17. [17]

    Flór and G

    J.-B. Flór and G. J. F. Van Heijst, Journal of Fluid Mechanics 279, 101 (1994)

    work page 1994

  18. [18]

    FlÃor, G

    J. FlÃor, G. Van Heijst, and R. Delfos, Phys. Fluids7, 374 (1995)

    work page 1995

  19. [19]

    Trieling, J

    R. Trieling, J. Van Wesenbeeck, and G. Van Heijst, Physics of Fluids10, 144 (1998)

    work page 1998

  20. [20]

    Davies, G

    J. Davies, G. Sutyrin, and P. Berloff, Physics of Fluids35 (2023)

    work page 2023

  21. [21]

    W. J. Devenport, J. S. Zsoldos, and C. M. V ogel, Journal of Fluid Mechanics332, 71 (1997)

    work page 1997

  22. [22]

    A. S. Chan, P. A. Dewey, A. Jameson, C. Liang, and A. J. Smits, Journal of Fluid Mechanics679, 343 (2011)

    work page 2011

  23. [23]

    Davies, G

    J. Davies, G. Sutyrin, M. Crowe, and P. Berloff, Physics of Fluids35(2023)

    work page 2023

  24. [24]

    C. F. Fontán and A. Verga, Physical Review E52, 6717 (1995)

    work page 1995

  25. [25]

    S. K. Yadav, A. Das, and P. Kaw, Phys. Plasma15, 062308 (2008)

    work page 2008

  26. [26]

    S. K. Yadav and A. Das, Phys. Plasma17, 052306 (2010)

    work page 2010

  27. [27]

    T. W. Neely, E. C. Samson, A. S. Bradley, M. J. Davis, and B. P. Anderson, Phys. Rev. Lett.104, 160401 (2010)

    work page 2010

  28. [28]

    G. K. Batchelor,An Introduction to Fluid Dynamics, Cam- bridge Mathematical Library (Cambridge University Press, 2000)

    work page 2000

  29. [29]

    Gupta, R

    A. Gupta, R. Mukherjee, and R. Ganesh, Contributions to Plasma Physics59, e201800189 (2019)

    work page 2019

  30. [30]

    Kaw and A

    P. Kaw and A. Sen, Physics of Plasmas5, 3552 (1998)

    work page 1998

  31. [31]

    Bandyopadhyay, G

    P. Bandyopadhyay, G. Prasad, A. Sen, and P. Kaw, inAIP Con- ference Proceedings, V ol. 1041 (2008)

    work page 2008

  32. [32]

    Singh Dharodi, S

    V . Singh Dharodi, S. Kumar Tiwari, and A. Das, Physics of Plasmas21(2014)

    work page 2014

  33. [33]

    Dharodi, A

    V . Dharodi, A. Das, B. Patel, and P. Kaw, Physics of Plasmas 23(2016)

    work page 2016

  34. [34]

    A. H. Nielsen and J. J. Rasmussen, Physics of Fluids9, 982 (1997)

    work page 1997

  35. [35]

    Schmidt, M

    M. Schmidt, M. Beckers, A. Nielsen, J. J. Rasmussen, and G. Van Heijst, Physics of Fluids10, 3099 (1998)

    work page 1998

  36. [36]

    Beckers, H

    M. Beckers, H. Clercx, G. Van Heijst, and R. Verzicco, Physics of Fluids14, 704 (2002)

    work page 2002

  37. [37]

    Choudhary, S

    M. Choudhary, S. Mukherjee, and P. Bandyopadhyay, Physics of Plasmas24(2017)

    work page 2017

  38. [38]

    Choudhary, R

    M. Choudhary, R. Bergert, S. Mitic, and M. H. Thoma, Physics of Plasmas27(2020)

    work page 2020

  39. [39]

    Couder and C

    Y . Couder and C. Basdevant, Journal of Fluid Mechanics173, 225 (1986)

    work page 1986

  40. [40]

    O. V . Fuentes and G. Van Heijst, Journal of Fluid Mechanics 259, 79 (1994)

    work page 1994

  41. [41]

    Bharuthram and P

    R. Bharuthram and P. Shukla, Planetary and space science40, 647 (1992)

    work page 1992

  42. [42]

    Rawat and N

    S. Rawat and N. Rao, Planetary and space science41, 137 (1993)

    work page 1993

  43. [43]

    Shukla and N

    P. Shukla and N. Rao, Planetary and space science41, 401 (1993)

    work page 1993

  44. [44]

    Jovanovi ´c and P

    D. Jovanovi ´c and P. Shukla, Physica Scripta2001, 49 (2001)

    work page 2001

  45. [45]

    Shukla and A

    P. Shukla and A. Mamun, New Journal of Physics5, 17 (2003)

    work page 2003

  46. [46]

    A. Ijaz, A. M. Mirza, and M. Azeem, Journal of plasma physics 73, 591 (2007)

    work page 2007

  47. [47]

    Laishram, Physica Scripta96, 045601 (2021)

    M. Laishram, Physica Scripta96, 045601 (2021)

    work page 2021

  48. [48]

    Swaters, Physics of Fluids31, 2745 (1988)

    G. Swaters, Physics of Fluids31, 2745 (1988)

    work page 1988

  49. [49]

    Bailung, B

    Y . Bailung, B. Chutia, T. Deka, A. Boruah, S. K. Sharma, S. Ku- mar, J. Chutia, Y . Nakamura, and H. Bailung, Physics of Plas- mas27(2020)

    work page 2020

  50. [50]

    J. B. Flór and G. J. F. Van Heijst, Journal of Fluid Mechanics 279, 101–133 (1994)

    work page 1994

  51. [51]

    Yasuda and G

    I. Yasuda and G. R. Flierl, Journal of Oceanography51, 145 (1995)

    work page 1995

  52. [52]

    L. K. BRANDT and K. K. NOMURA, Journal of Fluid Me- chanics646, 233–253 (2010)

    work page 2010

  53. [53]

    Josserand and M

    C. Josserand and M. Rossi, European Journal of Mechanics- B/Fluids26, 779 (2007)

    work page 2007

  54. [54]

    V . S. Dharodi, Physical Review E102, 043216 (2020)

    work page 2020

  55. [55]

    V . B. Rohit, V . Dharodi, and S. K. Yadav, Physics of Fluids37 (2025)

    work page 2025

  56. [56]

    Thomas, G

    H. Thomas, G. Morfill, V . Demmel, J. Goree, B. Feuerbacher, and D. Möhlmann, Physical Review Letters73, 652 (1994)

    work page 1994

  57. [57]

    Thomas Jr, Physics of plasmas6, 2672 (1999)

    E. Thomas Jr, Physics of plasmas6, 2672 (1999)

    work page 1999

  58. [58]

    Ichiki, Y

    R. Ichiki, Y . Ivanov, M. Wolter, Y . Kawai, and A. Melzer, Phys- ical Review E—Statistical, Nonlinear, and Soft Matter Physics 70, 066404 (2004)

    work page 2004

  59. [59]

    Haralson and J

    Z. Haralson and J. Goree, IEEE Transactions on Plasma Science 44, 549 (2015)

    work page 2015

  60. [60]

    Haralson and J

    Z. Haralson and J. Goree, Physics of Plasmas23(2016)

    work page 2016

  61. [61]

    Chaubey and J

    N. Chaubey and J. Goree, Frontiers in physics10, 879092 (2022)

    work page 2022

  62. [62]

    Chaubey and J

    N. Chaubey and J. Goree, Physics of plasmas29(2022)

    work page 2022

  63. [64]

    Singh, P

    S. Singh, P. Bandyopadhyay, K. Kumar, and A. Sen, Physics of Plasmas30(2023)

    work page 2023

  64. [65]

    S. K. Tiwari, V . S. Dharodi, A. Das, B. G. Patel, and P. Kaw, Physics of Plasmas22(2015)

    work page 2015

  65. [66]

    Dharodi and E

    V . Dharodi and E. Kostadinova, Physics of Plasmas31(2024)

    work page 2024

  66. [67]

    Peeters and X

    F. Peeters and X. Wu, Physical Review A35, 3109 (1987)

    work page 1987

  67. [68]

    Vladimirov, P

    S. Vladimirov, P. Shevchenko, and N. Cramer, Physical Review E56, R74 (1997)

    work page 1997

  68. [69]

    X. Wang, A. Bhattacharjee, and S. Hu, Physical review letters 86, 2569 (2001)

    work page 2001

  69. [70]

    Nunomura, D

    S. Nunomura, D. Samsonov, and J. Goree, Physical review let- ters84, 5141 (2000)

    work page 2000

  70. [71]

    Pramanik, G

    J. Pramanik, G. Prasad, A. Sen, and P. Kaw, Physical review letters88, 175001 (2002)

    work page 2002

  71. [72]

    Schmidt, G

    P. Schmidt, G. Zwicknagel, P.-G. Reinhard, and C. Toepffer, Physical Review E56, 7310 (1997)

    work page 1997

  72. [73]

    Kaw, Physics of Plasmas8, 1870 (2001)

    P. Kaw, Physics of Plasmas8, 1870 (2001)

    work page 2001

  73. [74]

    A. Das, V . Dharodi, and S. Tiwari, Journal of Plasma Physics 80, 855 (2014)

    work page 2014

  74. [75]

    Tiwari, V

    S. Tiwari, V . Dharodi, A. Das, P. Kaw, and A. Sen, Journal of Plasma Physics80, 817 (2014). 21

    work page 2014

  75. [76]

    P. K. Shukla and A. Mamun,Introduction to dusty plasma physics(CRC press, 2015)

    work page 2015

  76. [77]

    Chaubey, J

    N. Chaubey, J. Goree, S. J. Lanham, and M. J. Kushner, Physics of plasmas28(2021)

    work page 2021

  77. [78]

    Dharodi and E

    V . Dharodi and E. Kostadinova, Physical Review E107, 055208 (2023)

    work page 2023

  78. [79]

    Chaubey and J

    N. Chaubey and J. Goree, Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics56, 375202 (2023)

    work page 2023

  79. [80]

    V . S. Dharodi, S. K. Tiwari, and A. Das, Physics of Plasmas 21, 073705 (2014)

    work page 2014

  80. [81]

    J. P. Boris, A. M. Landsberg, E. S. Oran, and J. H. Gardner, LCPFCT A flux-corrected transport algorithm for solving gen- eralized continuity equations(Technical Report NRL Memo- randum Report 93-7192, Naval Research Laboratory, 1993)

    work page 1993

Showing first 80 references.