pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.21503 · v1 · pith:2VXYNKJDnew · submitted 2026-06-19 · ⚛️ physics.ao-ph · physics.flu-dyn

Zonal asymmetries control the response of atmospheric blocking to Arctic warming in an aquaplanet experiment

Michele Filippucci , Stephen Thomson , Neil Lewis , Simona Bordoni This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-26 12:36 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ physics.ao-ph physics.flu-dyn
keywords atmospheric blockingArctic warmingzonal asymmetriesTraffic Jam theoryaquaplanet simulationsstorm trackmidlatitude circulationcarrying capacity
0
0 comments X

The pith

Zonal asymmetries cause an upstream shift in atmospheric blocking under Arctic warming by crossing a carrying capacity threshold.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper runs aquaplanet simulations with and without a localized midlatitude storm track, then adds polar surface heating to mimic Arctic amplification. In the symmetric case blocking frequency rises uniformly because weaker zonal winds reduce the flow's carrying capacity for Rossby wave activity. In the asymmetric case the same capacity reduction produces an upstream displacement of the blocking maximum at the storm-track exit. The authors link the shift directly to the threshold behavior of blocking onset that defines the Traffic Jam theory. This shows that the spatial pattern of the blocking response depends on the zonal structure of the mean circulation.

Core claim

Imposing polar heating in aquaplanet runs increases atmospheric blocking in both configurations by weakening zonal winds, which lowers the Doppler-shifted Rossby wave group velocity and therefore the carrying capacity of the midlatitude flow. In the zonally symmetric setup the increase is uniform across latitudes. In the zonally asymmetric setup that includes a localized storm track, the identical reduction in carrying capacity instead displaces the blocking frequency maximum upstream of the storm-track exit because blocking onset occurs only once wave activity exceeds a threshold.

What carries the argument

Traffic Jam theory carrying capacity of the midlatitude flow, which sets the threshold for blocking onset when Rossby wave activity exceeds the flow's ability to propagate it downstream.

If this is right

  • Weakening of zonal winds from Arctic warming reduces carrying capacity and raises blocking frequency in any configuration.
  • The same capacity reduction produces an upstream shift of blocking only when zonal asymmetries are present.
  • Mean circulation characteristics determine the spatial pattern of the blocking response to polar heating.
  • The threshold nature of blocking onset converts a uniform capacity change into a localized frequency shift.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The upstream-shift mechanism may operate in models that include realistic land-sea contrasts and could alter projected changes in blocking over continents.
  • Similar capacity-threshold diagnostics could be applied to other midlatitude phenomena that depend on wave propagation speed.
  • If the threshold is confirmed, targeted changes to mean zonal wind could be used to test whether blocking frequency can be shifted without altering overall wave activity.

Load-bearing premise

The carrying capacity diagnosis and its threshold behavior from the Traffic Jam theory correctly explain why the upstream shift of blocking occurs only in the asymmetric configuration.

What would settle it

An asymmetric aquaplanet run with polar heating in which the blocking maximum does not shift upstream even though zonal winds weaken and carrying capacity falls.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.21503 by Michele Filippucci, Neil Lewis, Simona Bordoni, Stephen Thomson.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Climatology of EKE at 250hPa (panel a) and local wave activity (panel b). In each panel dashed contours represent the BASE ASYM simulation, while solid contours represent the BASE SYM simulation. The shadings depict the differences between the two (BASE ASYM - BASE SYM). The red triangle identifies the region where the triangular ocean heat flux has been applied in the ASYM simulations. On the left of each… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Panel (a) and (b) compare the atmospheric blocking frequency of the BASE ASYM and BASE SYM simulations with the corresponding carrying capacity. In panel (a) the zonal average of these two quantities for the BASE SYM experiment is plotted. The black line refers to the zonally averaged carrying capacity and the blue line to the zonally averaged blocking frequency. In panel (b) the black contour represents t… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Panel a and b report the zonally averaged temperature response to AA, in the SYM and ASYM simulations respectively. Panel c and d depict the zonally averaged zonal winds response to AA, in the SYM and ASYM simulations respectively. In all plots, black solid (dashed) contours show the represented field as simulated by the BASE (AA) simulation. Moreover, shadings represent the difference between the AA runs … view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Panel a and b depict the response of EKE to AA, in the SYM and ASYM setups respectively. Panel c and d report the response of LWA, while panel c and f report the response of atmospheric blocking frequency. The shadings and the contours refer to the same experiments as in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: The Figure depicts the response of the carrying capacity to an AA-like forcing, in the SYM and ASYM simulations. Panels a-c￾e-g refer to the SYM simulation, while panels b-d-f-h refer to the ASYM simulation. The response of carrying capacity is decomposed in various components: panel a and b show the total difference, panel c and d show the contribution of the α parameter, panel e and f show the contributi… view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: The Figure depicts the response of α (panels a,d), of the zonal Rossby wave group velocity (panels b,e) and of the quasi stationary local wave activity (panels c,f) to an AA-like forcing, in the SYM and ASYM simulations. Panels a-c-e-g refer to the SYM simulation, while panels b-d-f-h refer to the ASYM simulation. The shadings and the contours refer to the same experiments as in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/f… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

In recent years a weak but robust response of mean midlatitude circulation to Arctic amplification (AA) has emerged from modeling experiments. However, open questions remain about the mechanisms linking such circulation differences to weather extremes in the midlatitudes. In this study we investigate such mechanisms and the importance of zonal asymmetries in shaping the atmospheric blocking response to AA. We perform idealized aquaplanet simulations in two configurations: a zonally symmetric setup and a zonally asymmetric experiment featuring a localized midlatitude storm track. For each configuration, we examine the response to AA by imposing an anomalous surface heating in the polar region. In the zonally symmetric configuration atmospheric blocking increases uniformly with AA from mid to high latitudes. In the asymmetric configuration, the response is more complex; instead of a zonally uniform response, we observe an upstream displacement of the blocking maximum, which sits at the exit of the localized storm track. We interpret these changes through the lens of the Traffic Jam theory by diagnosing the carrying capacity of the midlatitude flow. In both configurations, the zonally averaged increase in blocking is primarily driven by a weakening of the zonal winds, which reduces the Doppler-shifted Rossby wave group velocity and, in turn, decreases the flow carrying capacity. While the reduction in carrying capacity has similar characteristics in the two configurations, in the asymmetric case it leads to an upstream shift of blocking frequency as a direct consequence of the threshold behavior of blocking onset that lies at the core of the Traffic Jam theory. This mechanism, which has received limited attention so far, highlights the importance of mean circulation characteristics in shaping the blocking response to external forcing such as Arctic warming.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript uses idealized aquaplanet simulations to compare the atmospheric blocking response to polar surface heating in a zonally symmetric configuration versus an asymmetric configuration with a localized midlatitude storm track. It reports a uniform increase in blocking frequency across mid-to-high latitudes in the symmetric case, but an upstream displacement of the blocking maximum (at the storm-track exit) in the asymmetric case. Both responses are attributed to a reduction in the midlatitude flow's carrying capacity arising from weakened zonal winds that lower the Doppler-shifted Rossby-wave group velocity; the asymmetric-case shift is interpreted as a direct consequence of the threshold behavior for blocking onset in the Traffic Jam theory.

Significance. If the mechanistic link holds, the work isolates the role of zonal asymmetries in shaping blocking changes under Arctic amplification and supplies a theory-based explanation that could be tested in more comprehensive models. The controlled experimental contrast and explicit diagnosis of carrying capacity from an external theory are strengths that allow a clear attribution of the differing responses.

major comments (1)
  1. [Results and interpretation of asymmetric configuration] The central interpretive claim (abstract and results on the asymmetric configuration) that the upstream shift arises 'as a direct consequence of the threshold behavior of blocking onset' is not supported by an explicit demonstration that the carrying-capacity threshold is evaluated locally within the storm-track region rather than on the zonal mean. The provided diagnostics are described only as zonally averaged reductions, leaving the predicted direction and location of the displacement unverified by the theory's onset criterion.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Methods] The methods section omits key numerical details (horizontal/vertical resolution, integration length, ensemble size) required to evaluate the statistical robustness of the reported blocking-frequency changes.
  2. [Results figures and text] Blocking-frequency responses are presented without error bars or significance testing, which would strengthen the contrast between the uniform and upstream-shifted responses.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their constructive review and for identifying an important point regarding the interpretation of the asymmetric configuration. We address the major comment below and commit to revisions that will strengthen the link to the Traffic Jam theory.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Results and interpretation of asymmetric configuration] The central interpretive claim (abstract and results on the asymmetric configuration) that the upstream shift arises 'as a direct consequence of the threshold behavior of blocking onset' is not supported by an explicit demonstration that the carrying-capacity threshold is evaluated locally within the storm-track region rather than on the zonal mean. The provided diagnostics are described only as zonally averaged reductions, leaving the predicted direction and location of the displacement unverified by the theory's onset criterion.

    Authors: We agree that the manuscript would benefit from an explicit local demonstration. Our current analysis diagnoses carrying capacity from the zonally averaged zonal wind reduction, which is reduced in both configurations. In the asymmetric experiment, the localized storm track creates zonal variations in the background flow; the theory's threshold for blocking onset is therefore crossed first in the region immediately upstream of the original blocking maximum once the carrying capacity drops below the local wave activity. To make this explicit, the revised manuscript will add maps of the local carrying capacity (computed from the Doppler-shifted group velocity at each longitude) together with the spatial field of wave activity relative to the local threshold. These diagnostics will directly verify that the threshold is first exceeded upstream of the storm-track exit, confirming the predicted displacement. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; results from direct simulation outputs interpreted via external theory

full rationale

The paper reports outcomes from aquaplanet simulations (symmetric and asymmetric configurations) with imposed polar heating, then diagnoses zonally-averaged carrying capacity from zonal wind changes. The upstream blocking shift in the asymmetric case is interpreted as following from the threshold behavior of the Traffic Jam theory. No equations, fitted parameters, or self-citations in the provided text reduce any claimed result to an input by construction, nor does any step equate a prediction to its own fit or definition. The derivation chain remains self-contained against the external benchmarks of the simulations and cited theory.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The claim depends on the idealized aquaplanet framework and the applicability of the Traffic Jam theory; the polar heating anomaly is an imposed input whose specific magnitude is not detailed.

free parameters (1)
  • anomalous surface heating magnitude
    The strength of the imposed polar heating is chosen to represent Arctic amplification but its numerical value is unspecified in the abstract.
axioms (2)
  • domain assumption The aquaplanet model equations and boundary conditions isolate the effects of zonal asymmetry without land or orography.
    The experimental design relies on this simplification to compare symmetric and asymmetric responses.
  • domain assumption The Traffic Jam theory's carrying capacity and threshold onset apply directly to the diagnosed blocking changes in these simulations.
    The mechanistic interpretation invokes this theory to link wind weakening to the observed shift.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5843 in / 1285 out tokens · 27081 ms · 2026-06-26T12:36:14.834837+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

60 extracted references · 60 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Barnes, E. A.: Revisiting the evidence linking Arctic amplification to extreme weather in midlatitudes, Geophysical research letters, 40, 4734–4739, https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/grl.50880,

    work page doi:10.1002/grl.50880

  2. [2]

    Barpanda, P. and Nakamura, N.: Local wave-activity analysis of atmospheric blocks in the Northern Hemisphere winter, Journal of Climate, https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-24-0232.1,

    work page doi:10.1175/jcli-d-24-0232.1

  3. [3]

    and Screen, J

    Blackport, R. and Screen, J. A.: Insignificant effect of Arctic amplification on the amplitude of midlatitude atmospheric waves, Science Advances, 6, eaay2880, https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aay2880,

    work page doi:10.1126/sciadv.aay2880

  4. [4]

    Blackport, R., Sigmond, M., and Screen, J. A.: Models and observations agree on fewer and milder midlatitude cold extremes even over recent decades of rapid Arctic warming, Science Advances, 10, eadp1346, https://doi.org/DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.adp1346,

    work page doi:10.1126/sciadv.adp1346

  5. [5]

    H., Thompson, D

    Butler, A. H., Thompson, D. W., and Heikes, R.: The steady-state atmospheric circulation response to climate change–like thermal forcings in a simple general circulation model, Journal of Climate, 23, 3474–3496, https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1175/2010JCLI3228.1,

    work page doi:10.1175/2010jcli3228.1

  6. [6]

    and Merlis, T

    Caballero, R. and Merlis, T. M.: Polar Feedbacks in Clear-Sky Radiative–Advective Equilibrium from an Airmass Transformation Perspective, Journal of Climate, 38, 3399–3416, https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-24-0031.1,

    work page doi:10.1175/jcli-d-24-0031.1

  7. [7]

    J.: Sinuosity of midlatitude atmospheric flow in a warming world, Geophysical Research Letters, 43, 8259–8268, https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/2016GL070309,

    Cattiaux, J., Peings, Y ., Saint-Martin, D., Trou-Kechout, N., and Vavrus, S. J.: Sinuosity of midlatitude atmospheric flow in a warming world, Geophysical Research Letters, 43, 8259–8268, https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/2016GL070309,

    work page doi:10.1002/2016gl070309

  8. [8]

    Charney, J. G. and Drazin, P. G.: Propagation of planetary-scale disturbances from the lower into the upper atmosphere, Journal of Geophysical Research, 66, 83–109, https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1029/JZ066i001p00083,

    work page doi:10.1029/jz066i001p00083

  9. [9]

    J., Bhatt, U

    Cohen, J., Zhang, X., Francis, J., Jung, T., Kwok, R., Overland, J., Ballinger, T. J., Bhatt, U. S., Chen, H.-W., Coumou, D., Feldstein, S., Gu, H., Handorf, D., Henderson, G., Ionita, M., Kretschmer, M., Laliberte, F., Lee, S.-K., Linderholm, H. W., Maslowski, W., Peings, Y ., Pfeiffer, K., Rigor, I., Semmler, T., Stroeve, J., Taylor, P. C., Vavrus, S., ...

    work page doi:10.1038/s41558-019-0662-y

  10. [10]

    Davini, P., Cagnazzo, C., Gualdi, S., and Navarra, A.: Bidimensional diagnostics, variability, and trends of Northern Hemisphere blocking, Journal of Climate, 25, 6496–6509, https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-12-00032.1,

    work page doi:10.1175/jcli-d-12-00032.1

  11. [11]

    Dole, R. M. and Gordon, N. D.: Persistent anomalies of the extratropical Northern Hemisphere wintertime circulation: Geographical distribution and regional persistence characteristics, Monthly Weather Review, 111, 1567–1586, https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(1983)111<1567:PAOTEN>2.0.CO;2,

    work page doi:10.1175/1520-0493(1983)111 1983

  12. [12]

    and Senior, Catherine A

    Eyring, V ., Bony, S., Meehl, G. A., Senior, C. A., Stevens, B., Stouffer, R. J., and Taylor, K. E.: Overview of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 (CMIP6) experimental design and organization, Geoscientific Model Development, 9, 1937–1958, https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-9-1937-2016,

    work page doi:10.5194/gmd-9-1937-2016 1937

  13. [13]

    Feldl, N., Anderson, B. T., and Bordoni, S.: Atmospheric eddies mediate lapse rate feedback and Arctic amplification, Journal of Climate, 30, 9213–9224, https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-16-0706.1,

    work page doi:10.1175/jcli-d-16-0706.1

  14. [14]

    Filippucci, M., Maddison, J., and Bordoni, S.: Tracking summer Greenland blocking: the upstream pathway shapes historical extremes and future change, International Journal of Climatology, https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.70472,

    work page doi:10.1002/joc.70472

  15. [15]

    30 Francis, J. A. and Vavrus, S. J.: Evidence linking Arctic amplification to extreme weather in mid-latitudes, Geophysical research letters, 39, https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1029/2012GL051000,

    work page doi:10.1029/2012gl051000

  16. [16]

    Francis, J. A. and Vavrus, S. J.: Evidence for a wavier jet stream in response to rapid Arctic warming, Environmental Research Letters, 10, 014 005, https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/10/1/014005,

    work page doi:10.1088/1748-9326/10/1/014005

  17. [17]

    Frierson, D. M.: The dynamics of idealized convection schemes and their effect on the zonally averaged tropical circulation, Journal of the atmospheric sciences, 64, 1959–1976, https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS3935.1,

    work page doi:10.1175/jas3935.1 1959

  18. [18]

    I., Screen, J

    Geen, R., Thomson, S. I., Screen, J. A., Blackport, R., Lewis, N. T., Mudhar, R., Seviour, W. J., and Vallis, G. K.: An explanation for the metric dependence of the midlatitude jet-waviness change in response to polar warming, Geophysical Research Letters, 50, e2023GL105 132, https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1029/2023GL105132,

    work page doi:10.1029/2023gl105132

  19. [19]

    Hassanzadeh, P., Kuang, Z., and Farrell, B. F.: Responses of midlatitude blocks and wave amplitude to changes in the meridional temperature gradient in an idealized dry GCM, Geophysical Research Letters, 41, 5223–5232, https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/2014GL060764,

    work page doi:10.1002/2014gl060764

  20. [20]

    A., and Catto, J

    Hay, S., Screen, J. A., and Catto, J. L.: Steady but model dependent Arctic amplification of the forced temperature response in 21st century CMIP6 projections, Environmental Research: Climate, 3, 031 003, https://doi.org/10.1088/2752-5295/ad4201,

    work page doi:10.1088/2752-5295/ad4201

  21. [21]

    L., Hewitt, H., Eunice Lo, Y ., Screen, J

    Hay, S., Blockley, E., Catto, J. L., Hewitt, H., Eunice Lo, Y ., Screen, J. A., Smith, D., and Yu, H.: The impact of Arctic sea-ice loss on winter weather in the British Isles, Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, p. e70012, https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.70012,

    work page doi:10.1002/qj.70012

  22. [22]

    Held, I. M., Ting, M., and Wang, H.: Northern winter stationary waves: Theory and modeling, Journal of climate, 15, 2125–2144, https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0442(2002)015<2125:NWSWTA>2.0.CO;2,

    work page doi:10.1175/1520-0442(2002)015 2002

  23. [23]

    Hu, Y ., Yang, D., and Yang, J.: Blocking systems over an aqua planet, Geophysical Research Letters, 35, https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1029/2008GL035351,

    work page doi:10.1029/2008gl035351

  24. [24]

    Huang, C. S. and Nakamura, N.: Local finite-amplitude wave activity as a diagnostic of anomalous weather events, Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences, 73, 211–229, https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-15-0194.1,

    work page doi:10.1175/jas-d-15-0194.1

  25. [25]

    Huang, C. S., Polster, C., and Nakamura, N.: Falwa: Python Package to Implement Finite-Amplitude Local Wave Activity Diagnostics on Climate Data, Geoscience Data Journal, 12, e70 006, https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/gdj3.70006,

    work page doi:10.1002/gdj3.70006

  26. [26]

    IPCC: Climate Change 2023: Synthesis Report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, IPCC, Geneva, Switzerland, https://doi.org/10.59327/IPCC/AR6-9789291691647,

    work page doi:10.59327/ipcc/ar6-9789291691647 2023

  27. [27]

    and Domeisen, D

    Jiménez-Esteve, B. and Domeisen, D. I.: The role of atmospheric dynamics and large-scale topography in driving heatwaves, Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, 148, 2344–2367, https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.4306,

    work page doi:10.1002/qj.4306

  28. [28]

    Kaspi, Y . and Schneider, T.: The role of stationary eddies in shaping midlatitude storm tracks, Journal of the atmospheric sciences, 70, 2596–2613, https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-12-082.1,

    work page doi:10.1175/jas-d-12-082.1

  29. [29]

    T., England, M

    Lewis, N. T., England, M. R., Screen, J. A., Geen, R., Mudhar, R., Seviour, W. J., and Thomson, S. I.: Assessing the Spurious Impacts of Ice- Constraining Methods on the Climate Response to Sea Ice Loss Using an Idealized Aquaplanet GCM, Journal of Climate, 37, 6729–6750, https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-24-0153.1, 2024a. Lewis, N. T., Sevio...

    work page doi:10.1175/jcli-d-24-0153.1

  30. [30]

    J., Screen, J

    Mudhar, R., Seviour, W. J., Screen, J. A., Geen, R., Lewis, N. T., and Thomson, S. I.: Exploring mechanisms for model- dependency of the stratospheric response to Arctic warming, Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 129, e2023JD040 416, https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1029/2023JD040416,

    work page doi:10.1029/2023jd040416

  31. [31]

    Nakamura, N.: Large-Scale Eddy-Mean Flow Interaction in the Earth’s Extratropical Atmosphere, Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics, 56, 349–377, https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-fluid-121021-035602,

    work page doi:10.1146/annurev-fluid-121021-035602

  32. [32]

    and Huang, C

    Nakamura, N. and Huang, C. S.: Atmospheric blocking as a traffic jam in the jet stream, Science, 361, 42–47, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aat0721,

    work page doi:10.1126/science.aat0721

  33. [33]

    Nakamura, N. and Zhu, D.: Finite-amplitude wave activity and diffusive flux of potential vorticity in eddy–mean flow interaction, Journal of the atmospheric sciences, 67, 2701–2716, https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1175/2010JAS3432.1,

    work page doi:10.1175/2010jas3432.1

  34. [34]

    F., Clark, S

    Narinesingh, V ., Booth, J. F., Clark, S. K., and Ming, Y .: Atmospheric blocking: The impact of topography in an idealized general circulation model, Weather and Climate Dynamics Discussions, 2020, 1–39, https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-1-293-2020,

    work page doi:10.5194/wcd-1-293-2020 2020

  35. [35]

    L., and Polvani, L

    Previdi, M., Smith, K. L., and Polvani, L. M.: Arctic amplification of climate change: a review of underlying mechanisms, Environmental Research Letters, 16, 093 003, https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ac1c29,

    work page doi:10.1088/1748-9326/ac1c29

  36. [36]

    Riboldi, J., Lott, F., d’Andrea, F., and Rivière, G.: On the linkage between Rossby wave phase speed, atmospheric blocking, and Arctic amplification, Geophysical Research Letters, 47, e2020GL087 796, https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1029/2020GL087796,

    work page doi:10.1029/2020gl087796

  37. [37]

    , number =

    Richards, P. I.: Shock waves on the highway, Operations research, 4, 42–51, https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1287/opre.4.1.42,

    work page doi:10.1287/opre.4.1.42

  38. [38]

    Riebold, J., Richling, A., Ulbrich, U., Rust, H., Semmler, T., and Handorf, D.: On the linkage between future Arctic sea ice retreat, Euro-Atlantic circulation regimes and temperature extremes over Europe, Weather and Climate Dynamics, 4, 663–682, https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-4-663-2023,

    work page doi:10.5194/wcd-4-663-2023 2023

  39. [39]

    and Barnes, E

    Ronalds, B. and Barnes, E. A.: A role for barotropic Eddy–Mean flow feedbacks in the zonal wind response to sea ice loss and arctic amplification, Journal of Climate, 32, 7469–7481, https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-19-0157.1,

    work page doi:10.1175/jcli-d-19-0157.1

  40. [40]

    Scaife, A. A., Woollings, T., Knight, J., Martin, G., and Hinton, T.: Atmospheric blocking and mean biases in climate models, Journal of Climate, 23, 6143–6152, https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1175/2010JCLI3728.1,

    work page doi:10.1175/2010jcli3728.1

  41. [41]

    Scherrer, S. C., Croci-Maspoli, M., Schwierz, C., and Appenzeller, C.: Two-dimensional indices of atmospheric blocking and their statistical relationship with winter climate patterns in the Euro-Atlantic region, International journal of climatology, 26, 233–250, https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.1250,

    work page doi:10.1002/joc.1250

  42. [42]

    Schneider, T., Bischoff, T., and Płotka, H.: Physics of changes in synoptic midlatitude temperature variability, Journal of Climate, 28, 2312– 2331, https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-14-00632.1,

    work page doi:10.1175/jcli-d-14-00632.1

  43. [43]

    32 Screen, J. A. and Simmonds, I.: The central role of diminishing sea ice in recent Arctic temperature amplification, Nature, 464, 1334–1337, https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1038/nature09051,

    work page doi:10.1038/nature09051

  44. [44]

    Screen, J. A. and Simmonds, I.: Exploring links between Arctic amplification and mid-latitude weather, Geophysical Research Letters, 40, 959–964, https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/grl.50174,

    work page doi:10.1002/grl.50174

  45. [45]

    Screen, J. A., Deser, C., and Sun, L.: Reduced risk of North American cold extremes due to continued Arctic sea ice loss, Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 96, 1489–1503, https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-14-00185.1,

    work page doi:10.1175/bams-d-14-00185.1

  46. [46]

    Screen, J. A., Smith, D., et al.: Net equatorward shift of the jet streams when the contribution from sea-ice loss is constrained by observed eddy feedback, Geophysical Research Letters, 49, e2022GL100 523, https://doi.org/10.1029/2022GL100523,

    work page doi:10.1029/2022gl100523

  47. [47]

    A., Audette, A., Blackport, R., Deser, C., England, M., Feldl, N., Gervais, M., Hay, S., Kushner, P

    Screen, J. A., Audette, A., Blackport, R., Deser, C., England, M., Feldl, N., Gervais, M., Hay, S., Kushner, P. J., Liang, Y .-C., et al.: Causes and consequences of Arctic amplification elucidated by coordinated multimodel experiments, Communications Earth & Environment, https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-025-03052-z,

    work page doi:10.1038/s43247-025-03052-z

  48. [48]

    Shaw, T., Baldwin, M., Barnes, E. A., Caballero, R., Garfinkel, C., Hwang, Y .-T., Li, C., O’gorman, P., Rivière, G., Simpson, I., et al.: Storm track processes and the opposing influences of climate change, Nature Geoscience, 9, 656–664, https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo2783,

    work page doi:10.1038/ngeo2783

  49. [49]

    Shaw, T. A. and Smith, Z.: The midlatitude response to polar sea ice loss: Idealized slab-ocean aquaplanet experiments with thermodynamic sea ice, Journal of Climate, 35, 2633–2649, https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-21-0508.1,

    work page doi:10.1175/jcli-d-21-0508.1

  50. [50]

    M., Screen, J

    Smith, D. M., Screen, J. A., Deser, C., Cohen, J., Fyfe, J. C., García-Serrano, J., Jung, T., Kattsov, V ., Matei, D., Msadek, R., et al.: The Polar Amplification Model Intercomparison Project (PAMIP) contribution to CMIP6: investigating the causes and consequences of polar amplification, Geoscientific Model Development, 12, 1139–1164, https://doi.org/htt...

    work page doi:10.5194/gmd-12-1139-2019 2019

  51. [51]

    Smith, D. M., Eade, R., Andrews, M., Ayres, H., Clark, A., Chripko, S., Deser, C., Dunstone, N., García-Serrano, J., Gastineau, G., et al.: Robust but weak winter atmospheric circulation response to future Arctic sea ice loss, Nature communications, 13, 727, https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-28283-y,

    work page doi:10.1038/s41467-022-28283-y

  52. [52]

    M., Trigo, R

    Sousa, P. M., Trigo, R. M., Barriopedro, D., Soares, P. M., and Santos, J. A.: European temperature responses to blocking and ridge regional patterns, Climate Dynamics, 50, 457–477, https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-017-3620-2,

    work page doi:10.1007/s00382-017-3620-2

  53. [53]

    Streffing, J., Semmler, T., Zampieri, L., and Jung, T.: Response of Northern Hemisphere weather and climate to Arctic sea ice decline: Resolution independence in Polar Amplification Model Intercomparison Project (PAMIP) simulations, Journal of Climate, 34, 8445– 8457, https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-19-1005.1,

    work page doi:10.1175/jcli-d-19-1005.1

  54. [54]

    and Molteni, F.: On the operational predictability of blocking, Tellus A, 42, 343–365, https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0870.1990.t01-2-00003.x,

    Tibaldi, S. and Molteni, F.: On the operational predictability of blocking, Tellus A, 42, 343–365, https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0870.1990.t01-2-00003.x,

    work page doi:10.1034/j.1600-0870.1990.t01-2-00003.x 1990

  55. [55]

    K., Colyer, G., Geen, R., et al

    Vallis, G. K., Colyer, G., Geen, R., Gerber, E., Jucker, M., Maher, P., Paterson, A., Pietschnig, M., Penn, J., and Thomson, S. I.: Isca, v1. 0: A framework for the global modelling of the atmospheres of Earth and other planets at varying levels of complexity, Geoscientific Model Development, 11, 843–859, https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-843-2018,

    work page doi:10.5194/gmd-11-843-2018 2018

  56. [56]

    R., and Seneviratne, S.: Blocking and its response to climate change, Current climate change reports, 4, 287–300, https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s40641-018-0108-z,

    Woollings, T., Barriopedro, D., Methven, J., Son, S.-W., Martius, O., Harvey, B., Sillmann, J., Lupo, A. R., and Seneviratne, S.: Blocking and its response to climate change, Current climate change reports, 4, 287–300, https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s40641-018-0108-z,

    work page doi:10.1007/s40641-018-0108-z

  57. [57]

    and Smith, K

    33 Wu, Y . and Smith, K. L.: Response of Northern Hemisphere midlatitude circulation to Arctic amplification in a simple atmospheric general circulation model, Journal of Climate, 29, 2041–2058, https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-15-0602.1,

    work page doi:10.1175/jcli-d-15-0602.1 2041

  58. [58]

    P., Castañeda, V ., and Ho, K

    Yan, X., Wang, L., Gerber, E. P., Castañeda, V ., and Ho, K. Y .: Traffic bottlenecks: Predicting atmospheric blocking with a diminishing flow capacity, Geophysical Research Letters, 51, e2024GL111 035, https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1029/2024GL111035,

    work page doi:10.1029/2024gl111035

  59. [59]

    and Kaspi, Y .: Eddy activity response to global warming–like temperature changes, Journal of Climate, 33, 1381–1404, https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-19-0190.1,

    Yuval, J. and Kaspi, Y .: Eddy activity response to global warming–like temperature changes, Journal of Climate, 33, 1381–1404, https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-19-0190.1,

    work page doi:10.1175/jcli-d-19-0190.1

  60. [60]

    Zhuo, W., Yao, Y ., Luo, D., Huang, F., Luo, B., and Zhong, L.: The response of atmospheric blocking and East Asian cold extremes to future Arctic Sea ice loss, Atmospheric Research, 304, 107 355, https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2024.107355,

    work page doi:10.1016/j.atmosres.2024.107355 2024