Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 62 references

Experimental observation of self-frequency-shifting Raman quasi-solitons in a fiber Fabry-Perot resonator

T0 review · 2 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-16 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The paper reports the first clear experimental observation of self-frequency-shifting Raman quasi-solitons in a fiber Fabry-Perot resonator, producing spectra spanning over 50 THz.

desk verdict A genuine experimental first—SFSR quasi-solitons in an FFP resonator, caught in real time—but the printed model equation is not the one that produces the simulations, so the numerics need a serious correction before they can underwrite the identification. read the letter →

arxiv 2505.02644 v1 pith:2XRIPZ2M submitted 2025-05-05 physics.optics

Thomas Bunel , Matteo Conforti , Arnaud Mussot This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.optics
keywords self-frequency-shiftingRamanquasi-solitonsfiberFabry-Perotresonatormodulationinstabilityfourth-orderdispersiondissipativeKerrsolitondispersiveFouriertransformsupercontinuumgenerationnormal
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper reports the first clear experimental observation of self-frequency-shifting Raman quasi-solitons in a pulsed fiber Fabry-Perot resonator, a short optical fiber between two highly reflective mirrors. In the weak-normal-dispersion regime, negative fourth-order dispersion makes modulation instability possible, and because the Raman gain overwhelms the cavity losses, the pulses that emerge do not lock to the cavity but continuously accelerate and slide toward lower frequencies. The resulting spectrum spans more than 50 THz and resembles single-pass supercontinuum. Single-shot dispersive Fourier transform traces show the predicted soliton fission and Raman redshift, and the same cavity can be switched to emit stable dissipative Kerr solitons by changing the synchronization mismatch between pump and cavity. The observations match a generalized Lugiato-Lefever equation with a delayed Raman response.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is a generalized Lugiato-Lefever equation (Eq. 1), the standard mean-field model of a driven nonlinear cavity, extended to a Fabry-Perot resonator with dispersion up to fourth order, a delayed Raman term using the silica response $h_R(t)$ of Eq. (2) with $\tau_1=12.2$ fs, $\tau_2=32$ fs and $f_R=0.18$, and a cross-phase-modulation term proportional to the roundtrip-averaged intensity. The odd-dispersion, Raman, and synchronization-mismatch terms break reflection symmetry, making the cavity convectively unstable so that modulation-instability patterns drift relative to the pump; when Raman gain overwhelms cavity losses, the drifting pulses become accelerating quasi-solitons. A linear stability analysis of this same equation yields the modulation-instability frequency of Eq. (3), which correctly predicts the observed $\pm 8.44$ THz sidebands. On the measurement side, the key tool is dispersive Fourier transform: a long dispersive fiber maps each output pulse's spectrum onto a single temporal trace, so the roundtrip-to-roundtrip Stokes shift and soliton fission can be watched directly.

What would settle it

Simulate the cavity with the Raman response turned off ($f_R=0$) while keeping every other parameter, then repeat the detuning scan at a synchronization mismatch of 72 fs; if the spectrum still broadens beyond 50 THz with accelerating red-shifting pulses, the Raman quasi-soliton interpretation is wrong. Experimentally, a single-shot DFT trace that shows the Stokes feature sliding at a rate inconsistent with the model's predicted acceleration would also settle the question.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper claims that a pulse-pumped, high-finesse fiber Fabry-Perot resonator operating in the weak normal dispersion regime can host self-frequency-shifting Raman quasi-solitons: pulses that emerge from modulation instability and, because the Raman gain dominates the cavity losses, do not lock to the cavity but continuously accelerate and slide toward lower optical frequencies. The evidence is a spectrum spanning more than 50 THz together with single-shot dispersive Fourier transform traces that show soliton fission, a progressive Stokes shift on each roundtrip, and emission of dispersive waves at phase-matched high frequencies — the same signatures as single-pass supercontinuum, but sustained inside a resonator. The authors also show that by detuning the pump repetition rate from the cavity roundtrip frequency by only a few femtoseconds of group delay, the same cavity instead emits a stable frequency-locked dissipative Kerr soliton. All of these observations are reproduced by a generalized Lugiato-Lefever equation that includes fourth-order dispersion, the delayed Raman response of silica, and the phase shift from counterpropagating waves.

Load-bearing premise

The whole identification rests on the assumption that the generalized Lugiato-Lefever equation, with its approximate silica Raman response and its chosen cross-phase-modulation parameter, faithfully represents the real cavity's counterpropagating-wave, dispersion, and Raman physics; if it does not, the observed broad spectra could come from a different combination of nonlinear effects rather than from self-frequency-shifting Raman quasi-solitons.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • A fiber Fabry-Perot resonator in the normal dispersion regime can produce supercontinuum-like spectra broader than 50 THz, making high-finesse cavities a tabletop alternative to single-pass fibers for broadband light generation.
  • The synchronization mismatch between pump repetition rate and cavity roundtrip time is a control knob: a few femtoseconds of group-delay mismatch determines whether the cavity emits a stable, coherent dissipative-Kerr-soliton comb or an incoherent broadband Raman-shifting output.
  • The generalized Lugiato-Lefever equation with a delayed Raman response quantitatively predicts both the MI-$\beta_4$ sideband frequencies and the dynamics of the resulting solitons, making it a reliable design tool for future cavity experiments.
  • Because the SFSR quasi-solitons evolve on every roundtrip, the output is not a stable frequency comb; applications needing a stable comb must lock to the frequency-locked soliton branch, while the broadband branch could serve applications tolerant of shot-to-shot variation.
  • Observing soliton fission in a resonator, where the pump continuously replenishes the gain, extends single-pass supercontinuum physics into a cavity setting and gives a platform to study repeated soliton acceleration and dispersive-wave emission.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the interpretation is right, the same design should scale: any resonator whose material has a Raman gain exceeding its cavity losses—for example other silica-based or gas-filled high-finesse cavities—should exhibit SFSR quasi-solitons, so the phenomenon is likely not specific to this fiber's exact dispersion values.
  • The synchronization-mismatch switch between drifting and locked solitons may apply to other convectively unstable cavity systems, such as Brillouin or active fiber cavities, suggesting a general way to select between coherent comb operation and broadband incoherent output.
  • A sharp test of the Raman mechanism would be to compare two cavities with identical dispersion but different Raman time constants or Raman fractions; the measured redshift rate and acceleration should track the Raman response parameters, not just the pump power.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper reports, for a pulsed-pump fiber Fabry-Perot resonator operating in the weak normal dispersion regime, the experimental observation of self-frequency-shifting Raman (SFSR) quasi-solitons whose spectrum spans over 50 THz. The authors identify the process with modulation instability mediated by fourth-order dispersion, confirm it with dispersive Fourier-transform single-shot measurements, and show that the same system can instead produce frequency-locked dissipative Kerr solitons by tuning the synchronization mismatch between pump repetition rate and cavity roundtrip time. The experimental spectra and roundtrip-resolved traces are compared with simulations of a generalized Lugiato-Lefever equation that includes the Raman response and cross-phase modulation. The central claim is the first clear experimental identification of SFSR quasi-solitons in this type of resonator.

Significance. If the central claim holds, the paper provides the first experimental confirmation of a regime theoretically predicted by Milián et al. (2015) and demonstrates a new platform for broadband, incoherent spectral generation in high-Q fiber Fabry-Perot resonators. The work is experimentally detailed: fiber and cavity parameters are independently measured, the MI sideband frequency predicted by linear stability analysis (Eq. 3) agrees quantitatively with experiment and numerics, and the DFT traces provide roundtrip-resolved evidence of soliton self-frequency shift and dispersive-wave emission. A notable strength is the absence of fitted free parameters in the reported comparison between theory and experiment. However, the manuscript as printed contains a load-bearing inconsistency in the model equation: the equation that supposedly underlies all ΔT-dependent simulations omits both the pump pulse envelope and the β1 walk-off term, even though the text states that β1 accounts for the synchronization mismatch. This makes the numerical support for the central identification non-reproducible as written and must be corrected before the claim can be fully assessed.

major comments (2)
  1. [Section III, Eq. (1) and Figs. 2–3] The printed generalized Lugiato-Lefever equation (Eq. 1) does not contain a pump-pulse envelope — the drive term is the CW expression θ√Pin — and the dispersion sum runs only over n = 2, 3, 4, with no β1∂ψ/∂τ term. Yet the text states that β1 = −ΔT/L accounts for the synchronization mismatch, and the simulations in Fig. 2(c)–(h) and Fig. 3 vary ΔT as the central control parameter. As typeset, Eq. (1) is a CW model in which ΔT cannot enter, so the numerical results that map the transition from frequency-locked solitons (ΔT = 3 fs) to SFSR quasi-solitons (ΔT = 72 fs) are not reproducible from the manuscript. The authors should report the full equation actually solved, including the 55 ps Gaussian pump profile p(τ) and the β1 walk-off term, or specify unambiguously how ΔT enters the computation. Without this, the numerical evidence underpinning the identification of SFSR quasi-solitons is not established by the manuscript as written.
  2. [Section III, Eq. (1), XPM term] The cross-phase-modulation term is written as (χG/tR) ∫_{tR} |ψ|^2 dτ′, with χ defined as the ratio of the pulse duration to the cavity roundtrip time. For a short pulse of duration t_p and peak power P, ∫_{tR} |ψ|^2 dτ′ ≈ P t_p, so the printed coefficient gives an effective XPM of χG P (t_p/tR) = G P χ². The physically intended effective XPM for a pulsed pump is G P χ (i.e., G/tR times the roundtrip integral). As printed, the XPM contribution is smaller than intended by a factor of χ ≈ 0.027. Please correct the coefficient (either to G/tR or to χG/t_p) and confirm that the simulations use the corrected form.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Section III, text after Fig. 2] The sentence referring to the ΔT = 3 fs case cites "Fig. 2(e) and (h)"; panel (h) belongs to the ΔT = 41 fs case, so the second citation should likely be panel (f).
  2. [Section III, phase-matching discussion] The text says the phase-matching condition is indicated by a "red arrow in Fig. 3(b)", but Fig. 3(b) is a nonlinear transfer function; the arrow for the dispersive-wave peak should be in the corresponding spectrum panel (c) or (d).
  3. [Section III, first paragraph after Fig. 2] "To resume" should be "To summarize".
  4. [Eq. (3)] The notation switches between δ and δ0; Eq. (3) uses δ0 while the surrounding text uses δ. Please use one symbol consistently.
  5. [Eq. (1), notation] The fast-time variable is introduced as t′ in the text but the XPM integral uses τ′; please align the notation.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the MI prediction, numerical simulations, and DFT-based identification of SFSR quasi-solitons are independently checked against experimental parameters and external benchmarks.

full rationale

No circular step is present. The MI frequency in Eq. (3) is obtained by linear stability analysis of Eq. (1) and evaluated with independently measured fiber parameters (β2 = 0.145 ps^2/km, β4 = −9.5×10^−4 ps^4/km, γ = 2.5 W^−1km^−1), cavity parameters (finesse F = 800, transmissivity θ = 0.0374, detuning), and pump power Pin = 8 W; the theoretical value of 8.5167 THz is compared with the measured sideband at 8.44 THz rather than fitted to it. The identification of SFSR quasi-solitons is supported by numerical solutions of Eq. (1) using the standard silica Raman response (τ1 = 12.2 fs, τ2 = 32 fs, fR = 0.18) and by single-shot DFT traces; the Raman redshift, spectral broadening, and dispersive-wave emission are predicted by the model, not imposed by matching the targeted spectra, and the experiment–simulation agreement in Figs. 1(c), 3(d), and 4 provides independent validation. The dispersive-wave phase-matching check in Eq. (4) also uses independently observed spectral-recoil values rather than quantities taken from the target spectrum. Self-citations such as Refs. [38, 39, 43] support the experimental platform and the MI theory, but the cited MI theory is parameter-free and externally falsifiable against the measured sideband, so it does not constitute load-bearing circularity. A separate reproducibility caveat is that Eq. (1) as printed shows a CW pump term θ√Pin and no explicit β1∂ψ/∂τ walk-off term, even though the text states β1 = −ΔT/L and describes a 55 ps Gaussian pulse train; this is a model-reporting and reproducibility concern, not a circularity, because no predicted quantity reduces to its own input by construction.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No free parameters are fitted to the experimental spectra; all model parameters are either measured (dispersion, nonlinearity, cavity finesse, pump power, pulse duration) or taken from standard silica fiber references (Raman parameters). The central claim rests on the domain assumptions listed above, which are typical for this class of experiments.

assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption The generalized Lugiato-Lefever equation (Eq. 1) accurately models the fiber Fabry-Perot resonator dynamics, including the mean-field approximation and the additional phase shift from counterpropagating waves.
    The central identification of SFSR quasi-solitons relies on simulations with this equation. The model is standard for FFP resonators and is cited, but it involves approximations such as the mean-field limit and a specific treatment of the counterpropagating phase shift.
  • domain assumption The Raman response of the silica fiber is described by the approximate function in Eq. (2) with parameters tau1 = 12.2 fs, tau2 = 32 fs, fR = 0.18 from Ref. [36].
    The Raman-induced frequency shift is the key physical mechanism for SFSR quasi-solitons. The approximate Raman model is taken from standard silica fiber literature; a more detailed Raman spectrum could alter the quantitative dynamics.
  • domain assumption The dispersive Fourier transform mapping uses only second-order dispersion of the SMF-28 fiber, neglecting higher-order dispersion (Eq. 5 simplified to omega = omega0 + t/(beta2 z)).
    The DFT calibration assumes linear frequency-to-time mapping. Any contribution from third- or higher-order dispersion in the 200 m SMF-28 could introduce errors in the reconstructed spectral axis, though the authors validate the DFT by comparison with OSA measurements.
  • domain assumption The cross-phase modulation interaction between the orthogonally polarized control and pump beams is captured by the term chi G with chi = 0.027 and G = 2 in Eq. (1).
    The XPM term is included using a time-averaged approximation of the pump pulse over the cavity roundtrip. The value chi is derived from the ratio of pulse duration to roundtrip time, and the assumption of orthogonal polarizations with G = 2 is standard.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Experimental observation of self-frequency-shifting Raman quasi-solitons in a fiber Fabry-Perot resonator." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/2XRIPZ2M

@misc{pith2026250502644,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Experimental observation of self-frequency-shifting Raman quasi-solitons in a fiber Fabry-Perot resonator},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/2XRIPZ2M}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2505.02644}
}
read the original abstract

We report the generation of self-frequency-shifting Raman quasi-solitons in a pulse-pumped high-Q fiber Fabry-Perot resonator in the weak normal dispersion regime. They are induced by modulation instability mediated by fourth-order dispersion in a regime where the Raman gain overwhelms the cavity losses. The resulting spectrum, spanning over 50 THz, is reminiscent of the supercontinuum generated in single-pass waveguides. For the first time to our knowledge, we clearly identify this process using a dispersive Fourier transform experiment. Additionally, we demonstrate the suppression of modulation instability by tuning the synchronization mismatch between the pump repetition rate and the cavity roundtrip time, enabling the generation of a standard dissipative Kerr soliton in this system. These observations align remarkably well with numerical simulations based on a generalized Lugiato-Lefever equation, incorporating the Raman response of the optical fiber.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2505.02644 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Experimental setup and MI- [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. Numerical simulations of FFP cavity nonlinear dy [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. Cavity soliton-induced OFC and SFSR quasi-solitons-induced supercontinuum. (a), (c), (e), (f) and (i) are numerical [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. DFT experiment. (a) Comparison between OSA measurement and DFT measurement. (b) Frequency domain signal [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_4.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

62 extracted references · 51 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    T. J. Kippenberg, A. L. Gaeta, M. Lipson, and M. L. Gorodetsky, Dissipative Kerr solitons in optical microres- onators, Science 361, eaan8083 (2018)

    2018

  2. [2]

    Pasquazi, M

    A. Pasquazi, M. Peccianti, L. Razzari, D. J. Moss, S. Coen, M. Erkintalo, Y. K. Chembo, T. Hansson, S. Wabnitz, P. Del’Haye, X. Xue, A. M. Weiner, and R. Morandotti, Micro-combs: A novel generation of op- tical sources, Physics Reports 729, 1 (2018)

    2018

  3. [3]

    Y. Sun, J. Wu, M. Tan, X. Xu, Y. Li, R. Morandotti, A. Mitchell, and D. J. Moss, Applications of optical microcombs, Advances in Optics and Photonics 15, 86 (2023)

    2023

  4. [4]

    Coen and M

    S. Coen and M. Haelterman, Continuous-wave ultrahigh- repetition-rate pulse-train generation through modula- tional instability in a passive fiber cavity, Optics Letters 26, 39 (2001)

    work page 2001

  5. [5]

    Bessin, F

    F. Bessin, F. Copie, M. Conforti, A. Kudlinski, A. Mus- sot, and S. Trillo, Real-Time Characterization of Period- Doubling Dynamics in Uniform and Dispersion Oscillat- ing Fiber Ring Cavities, Physical Review X 9, 041030 (2019)

    work page 2019

  6. [6]

    Copie, M

    F. Copie, M. Conforti, A. Kudlinski, S. Trillo, and A. Mussot, Dynamics of turing and faraday instabilities in a longitudinally modulated fiber-ring cavity, Opt. Lett. 42, 435 (2017)

    work page 2017

  7. [7]

    Negrini, S

    S. Negrini, S. Coulibaly, F. Copie, M. Taki, and A. Mus- sot, Pump-cavity synchronization mismatch in modula- tion instability induced optical frequency combs, Physical Review Research 5, 023133 (2023)

    work page 2023

  8. [8]

    Coulibaly, M

    S. Coulibaly, M. Taki, A. Bendahmane, G. Millot, B. Ki- bler, and M. G. Clerc, Turbulence-induced rogue waves in kerr resonators, Phys. Rev. X 9, 011054 (2019)

    work page 2019

Show all 62 references
  1. [9]

    Coillet, J

    A. Coillet, J. Dudley, G. Genty, L. Larger, and Y. K. Chembo, Optical rogue waves in whispering-gallery-mode resonators, Phys. Rev. A 89, 013835 (2014)

    2014

  2. [10]

    T. Herr, V. Brasch, J. D. Jost, C. Y. Wang, N. M. Kon- dratiev, M. L. Gorodetsky, and T. J. Kippenberg, Tempo- ral solitons in optical microresonators, Nature Photonics 8, 145 (2014)

    2014

  3. [11]

    Brasch, M

    V. Brasch, M. Geiselmann, T. Herr, G. Lihachev, M. H. P. Pfeiffer, M. L. Gorodetsky, and T. J. Kippen- berg, Photonic chip–based optical frequency comb using soliton Cherenkov radiation, Science 351, 357 (2016)

    2016

  4. [12]

    Englebert, C

    N. Englebert, C. M. Arab´ ı, S.-P. Gorza, and F. Leo, High peak-to-background-ratio solitons in a coherently driven active fiber cavity, APL Photonics 8, 120802 (2023)

    2023

  5. [13]

    Z. Li, Y. Xu, S. Coen, S. G. Murdoch, and M. Erkin- talo, Experimental observations of bright dissipative cav- ity solitons and their collapsed snaking in a Kerr res- onator with normal dispersion driving, Optica 7, 1195 (2020)

    2020

  6. [14]

    Englebert, C

    N. Englebert, C. Mas Arab´ ı, P. Parra-Rivas, S.-P. Gorza, and F. Leo, Temporal solitons in a coherently driven ac- tive resonator, Nature Photonics 15, 536 (2021)

    2021

  7. [15]

    Obrzud, S

    E. Obrzud, S. Lecomte, and T. Herr, Temporal solitons in microresonators driven by optical pulses, Nature Pho- tonics 11, 600 (2017)

    2017

  8. [16]

    Bunel, M

    T. Bunel, M. Conforti, Z. Ziani, J. Lumeau, A. Moreau, A. Fernandez, O. Llopis, G. Bourcier, and A. Mussot, 28 THz soliton frequency comb in a continuous-wave pumped fiber Fabry–P´ erot resonator, APL Photonics9, 010804 (2024)

    2024

  9. [17]

    Lucas, M

    E. Lucas, M. Deroh, and B. Kibler, Dynamic Interplay Between Kerr Combs and Brillouin Lasing in Fiber Cav- ities, Laser & Photonics Reviews , 2300041 (2023)

    2023

  10. [18]

    M. Nie, B. Li, K. Jia, Y. Xie, J. Yan, S. Zhu, Z. Xie, and S.-W. Huang, Dissipative soliton generation and real-time dynamics in microresonator-filtered fiber lasers, Light: Science & Applications 11, 296 (2022)

    2022

  11. [19]

    Bunel, J

    T. Bunel, J. Lumeau, A. Moreau, A. Fernandez, O. Llopis, G. Bourcier, A. Perego, M. Conforti, and A. Mussot, Brillouin-induced kerr frequency comb in normal dispersion fiber fabry perot resonators (2025), arXiv:2502.03037 [physics.optics]

    2025 arXiv

  12. [20]

    T. Li, J. Chen, and K. Wu, Ultra-flat broadband low- noise frequency comb in a fiber fabry-perot resonator, Laser and Photonics Reviews 10.1002/lpor.202400180 (2025)

    2025 doi

  13. [21]

    T. Li, K. Wu, X. Zhang, M. Cai, and J. Chen, Experimen- tal observation of stimulated Raman scattering enabled localized structure in a normal dispersion FP resonator, Optica 10, 1389 (2023)

    2023

  14. [22]

    Z. Li, Y. Xu, S. Shamailov, X. Wen, W. Wang, X. Wei, Z. Yang, S. Coen, S. G. Murdoch, and M. Erkintalo, Ul- trashort dissipative Raman solitons in Kerr resonators driven with phase-coherent optical pulses, Nature Pho- tonics 10.1038/s41566-023-01303-z (2023)

    2023 doi

  15. [23]

    Suh and K

    M.-G. Suh and K. J. Vahala, Soliton microcomb range measurement, Science 359, 884 (2018)

    2018

  16. [24]

    Q.-F. Yang, X. Yi, K. Y. Yang, and K. Vahala, Stokes solitons in optical microcavities, Nature Physics 13, 53–57 (2016)

    2016

  17. [25]

    Y. Wang, M. Anderson, S. Coen, S. G. Murdoch, and M. Erkintalo, Stimulated Raman Scattering Imposes Fundamental Limits to the Duration and Bandwidth of Temporal Cavity Solitons, Physical Review Letters 120, 10.1103/physrevlett.120.053902 (2018), publisher: American Physical So...

    2018 doi

  18. [26]

    Mili´ an, A

    C. Mili´ an, A. V. Gorbach, M. Taki, A. V. Yulin, and D. V. Skryabin, Solitons and frequency combs in silica microring resonators: Interplay of the Raman and higher- order dispersion effects, Physical Review A 92, 033851 (2015)

    2015

  19. [27]

    Karpov, H

    M. Karpov, H. Guo, A. Kordts, V. Brasch, M. H. Pfeif- fer, M. Zervas, M. Geiselmann, and T. J. Kippenberg, Raman Self-Frequency Shift of Dissipative Kerr Solitons in an Optical Microresonator, Physical Review Letters 116, 10.1103/physrevlett.116.103902 (2016), publisher: Ameri...

    2016 doi

  20. [28]

    J. M. Dudley and J. R. Taylor, eds., Supercontinuum Generation in Optical Fibers (Cambridge University Press, 2010)

    2010

  21. [29]

    J. M. Dudley, G. Genty, and S. Coen, Supercontinuum generation in photonic crystal fiber, Reviews of Modern Physics 78, 1135 (2006)

    2006

  22. [30]

    Br` es, A

    C.-S. Br` es, A. Della Torre, D. Grassani, V. Brasch, C. Grillet, and C. Monat, Supercontinuum in integrated photonics: generation, applications, challenges, and per- spectives, Nanophotonics 12, 1199 (2023)

    2023

  23. [31]

    F. Meng, C. Lapre, C. Billet, T. Sylvestre, J.-M. Merolla, C. Finot, S. K. Turitsyn, G. Genty, and J. M. Dud- ley, Intracavity incoherent supercontinuum dynamics and 9 rogue waves in a broadband dissipative soliton laser, Nature Communications 12, 10.1038/s41467-021-25861- 4 (2021)

    2021 doi

  24. [32]

    Del’Haye, A

    P. Del’Haye, A. Schliesser, O. Arcizet, T. Wilken, R. Holzwarth, and T. J. Kippenberg, Optical frequency comb generation from a monolithic microresonator, Na- ture 450, 1214 (2007)

    2007

  25. [33]

    S. B. Papp, K. Beha, P. Del’Haye, F. Quinlan, H. Lee, K. J. Vahala, and S. A. Diddams, Microresonator fre- quency comb optical clock, Optica 1, 10 (2014), pub- lisher: Optica Publishing Group

    2014

  26. [34]

    J. Li, H. Lee, T. Chen, and K. J. Vahala, Low-Pump- Power, Low-Phase-Noise, and Microwave to Millimeter- Wave Repetition Rate Operation in Microcombs, Physi- cal Review Letters 109, 10.1103/physrevlett.109.233901 (2012), publisher: American Physical Society (APS)

    2012 doi

  27. [35]

    Z. Xiao, T. Li, M. Cai, H. Zhang, Y. Huang, C. Li, B. Yao, K. Wu, and J. Chen, Near-zero-dispersion soli- ton and broadband modulational instability Kerr micro- combs in anomalous dispersion, Light: Science & Appli- cations 12, 33 (2023)

    2023

  28. [36]

    G. P. Agrawal, Non linear fiber optics, in Nonlinear Fiber Optics (Elsevier, 2013) pp. i–ii

    2013

  29. [37]

    Zideluns, F

    J. Zideluns, F. Lemarchand, D. Arhilger, H. Hagedorn, and J. Lumeau, Automated optical monitoring wave- length selection for thin-film filters, Optics Express 29, 33398 (2021)

    2021

  30. [38]

    Bunel, M

    T. Bunel, M. Conforti, J. Lumeau, A. Moreau, and A. Mussot, Broadband kerr frequency comb in fiber fabry-perot resonators induced by switching waves, Phys. Rev. A 109, 063521 (2024)

    2024

  31. [39]

    Bunel, Z

    T. Bunel, Z. Ziani, M. Conforti, J. Lumeau, A. Moreau, A. Fernandez, O. Llopis, G. Bourcier, A. M. Perego, and A. Mussot, Impact of pump pulse duration on modulation instability Kerr frequency combs in fiber Fabry–P´ erot resonators, Optics Letters 48, 5955 (2023)

    2023

  32. [40]

    E. D. Black, An introduction to Pound–Drever–Hall laser frequency stabilization, American Journal of Physics 69, 79 (2001)

    2001

  33. [41]

    W. J. Firth, J. B. Geddes, N. J. Karst, and G.-L. Oppo, Analytic instability thresholds in folded kerr resonators of arbitrary finesse, Physical Review A 103, 023510 (2021)

    2021

  34. [42]

    D. C. Cole, A. Gatti, S. B. Papp, F. Prati, and L. Lu- giato, Theory of Kerr frequency combs in Fabry-Perot resonators, Physical Review A 98, 013831 (2018)

    2018

  35. [43]

    Ziani, T

    Z. Ziani, T. Bunel, A. M. Perego, A. Mussot, and M. Con- forti, Theory of modulation instability in Kerr Fabry- Perot resonators beyond the mean-field limit, Physical Review A 109, 013507 (2024)

    2024

  36. [44]

    Bessin, F

    F. Bessin, F. Copie, M. Conforti, A. Kudlinski, and A. Mussot, Modulation instability in the weak normal dispersion region of passive fiber ring cavities, Optics Let- ters 42, 3730 (2017)

    2017

  37. [45]

    N. L. B. Sayson, T. Bi, V. Ng, H. Pham, L. S. Trainor, H. G. L. Schwefel, S. Coen, M. Erkintalo, and S. G. Mur- doch, Octave-spanning tunable parametric oscillation in crystalline Kerr microresonators, Nature Photonics 13, 701 (2019)

    2019

  38. [46]

    Mussot, E

    A. Mussot, E. Louvergneaux, N. Akhmediev, F. Rey- naud, L. Delage, and M. Taki, Optical Fiber Systems Are Convectively Unstable, Physical Review Letters101, 113904 (2008)

    2008

  39. [47]

    F. Leo, A. Mussot, P. Kockaert, P. Emplit, M. Hael- terman, and M. Taki, Nonlinear Symmetry Breaking In- duced by Third-Order Dispersion in Optical Fiber Cavi- ties, Physical Review Letters 110, 104103 (2013)

    2013

  40. [48]

    Mili´ an and D

    C. Mili´ an and D. Skryabin, Soliton families and reso- nant radiation in a micro-ring resonator near zero group- velocity dispersion, Optics Express 22, 3732 (2014)

    2014

  41. [49]

    Macnaughtan, M

    M. Macnaughtan, M. Erkintalo, S. Coen, S. Murdoch, and Y. Xu, Temporal characteristics of stationary switch- ing waves in a normal dispersion pulsed-pump fiber cav- ity, Optics Letters 48, 4097 (2023)

    2023

  42. [50]

    M. H. Anderson, W. Weng, G. Lihachev, A. Tikan, J. Liu, and T. J. Kippenberg, Zero dispersion Kerr solitons in op- tical microresonators, Nature Communications 13, 4764 (2022)

    2022

  43. [51]

    Zhang, T

    S. Zhang, T. Bi, and P. Del’Haye, Quintic Dispersion Soliton Frequency Combs in a Microresonator, Laser & Photonics Reviews 17, 2300075 (2023)

    2023

  44. [52]

    Conforti and S

    M. Conforti and S. Trillo, Dispersive wave emission from wave breaking, Optics Letters 38, 3815 (2013)

    2013

  45. [53]

    J. K. Jang, M. Erkintalo, S. G. Murdoch, and S. Coen, Observation of dispersive wave emission by temporal cav- ity solitons, Optics Letters 39, 5503 (2014)

    2014

  46. [54]

    Goda and B

    K. Goda and B. Jalali, Dispersive Fourier transforma- tion for fast continuous single-shot measurements, Na- ture Photonics 7, 102 (2013)

    2013

  47. [55]

    Godin, L

    T. Godin, L. Sader, A. Khodadad Kashi, P.-H. Hanzard, A. Hideur, D. J. Moss, R. Morandotti, G. Genty, J. M. Dudley, A. Pasquazi, M. Kues, and B. Wetzel, Recent advances on time-stretch dispersive Fourier transform and its applications, Advances in Physics: X 7, 2067487 (2022)

    2022

  48. [56]

    Kolner, Space-time duality and the theory of temporal imaging, IEEE Journal of Quantum Electronics 30, 1951 (1994)

    B. Kolner, Space-time duality and the theory of temporal imaging, IEEE Journal of Quantum Electronics 30, 1951 (1994)

    1994

  49. [57]

    J. Chou, D. R. Solli, and B. Jalali, Real-time spec- troscopy with subgigahertz resolution using amplified dis- persive Fourier transformation, Applied Physics Letters 92, 10.1063/1.2896652 (2008), publisher: AIP Publish- ing

    2008 doi

  50. [58]

    D. R. Solli, C. Ropers, and B. Jalali, Active Control of Rogue Waves for Stimulated Supercontinuum Gen- eration, Physical Review Letters 101, 10.1103/phys- revlett.101.233902 (2008), publisher: American Physical Society (APS)

    2008 doi

  51. [59]

    Wetzel, A

    B. Wetzel, A. Stefani, L. Larger, P. A. Lacourt, J. M. Merolla, T. Sylvestre, A. Kudlinski, A. Mussot, G. Genty, F. Dias, and J. M. Dudley, Real-time full bandwidth measurement of spectral noise in supercontinuum gen- eration, Scientific Reports 2, 10.1038/srep00882 (2012), pu...

    2012 doi

  52. [60]

    Cutrona, V

    A. Cutrona, V. Cecconi, P. H. Hanzard, M. Rowley, D. Das, A. Cooper, L. Peters, L. Olivieri, B. Wetzel, R. Morandotti, S. T. Chu, B. E. Little, D. J. Moss, J. S. Totero Gongora, M. Peccianti, and A. Pasquazi, Nonlocal bonding of a soliton and a blue-detuned state in a micro- c...

    2023 doi

  53. [61]

    Lapre, C

    C. Lapre, C. Billet, F. Meng, G. Genty, and J. M. Dud- ley, Dispersive Fourier transform characterization of mul- tipulse dissipative soliton complexes in a mode-locked soliton-similariton laser, OSA Continuum 3, 275 (2020), publisher: Optica Publishing Group

    2020

  54. [62]

    Copie, M

    F. Copie, M. Conforti, A. Kudlinski, S. Trillo, and A. Mussot, Modulation instability in the weak disper- 10 sion regime of a dispersion modulated passive fiber-ring cavity, Opt. Express 25, 11283 (2017)

    2017

Pith tools

Reviewed August 16, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.