Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 4 minor 71 references

Evidence for the First Globular Cluster Stellar Stream beyond the Milky Way

T0 review · 4 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-16 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The paper reports evidence for the first globular cluster stellar stream outside the Milky Way, in the ultra-diffuse galaxy UGC9050-Dw1, and uses the stream's shape to measure the galaxy's dark matter halo.

desk verdict A careful, well-caveated candidate detection of the first extragalactic GC stream, but the discovery claim outruns the statistics because chance projection is never quantified. read the letter →

arxiv 2608.12254 v1 pith:2ZJXHGT6 submitted 2026-08-12 astro-ph.GA astro-ph.CO

Julie Kiel Holm , Sarah Pearson , Jacob Nibauer , David J. Sand , Adrian M. Price-Whelan , Tjitske Starkenburg , David Hendel , Catherine Fielder This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.GAastro-ph.CO
keywords globularclusterstellarstreamultra-diffusegalaxyUGC9050-Dw1OyashiodarkmatterhalotidaldisruptionHubbleSpaceTelescopegenerativemodelling
topics Dark Matter
open problems Dark Matter
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper claims that a thin, roughly 2 kpc-long stellar stream observed in deep Hubble Space Telescope imaging of the ultra-diffuse galaxy UGC9050-Dw1 is the first globular cluster stream found beyond the Milky Way, at a distance of about 35 Mpc. The stream, named Oyashio, has a measured width of roughly 72 pc, integrated colours that match the nearby compact source proposed as its parent globular cluster, and a surface brightness that can be reproduced by simulated globular cluster stellar populations. Feeding the stream's morphology into a generative dynamical model yields a 95% confidence upper limit on the initial progenitor mass of $M_{\mathrm{prog}} < 2.5 \times 10^6\,M_\odot$, consistent with a globular cluster origin, and produces the first stream-based dark matter halo constraint for an ultra-diffuse galaxy: $\log_{10}(M_{\mathrm{halo}}/M_\odot) = 11.31^{+0.67}_{-0.71}$ and an inner density slope $\gamma = 0.92^{+0.57}_{-0.58}$. If correct, the detection establishes extragalactic globular cluster streams as a practical probe of dark matter in low-surface-brightness galaxies.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the candidate stream itself, Oyashio: a thin, curved surface-brightness enhancement extending about 2 kpc from a compact globular cluster candidate near UGC9050-Dw1, with a measured width $w_{\pm\sigma} = 72.3 \pm 8.9$ pc and a signal prominence of $(f_{\mathrm{stream}} - \bar{f}_{\mathrm{background}})/\sigma_{\mathrm{background}} = 7.34$ in the combined HST image. The modelling machinery is X-Stream, a generative sampler that builds particle-spray tidal stream models inside a dark matter halo potential, constructs kernel density estimates of the model and of the observed control points, and scores the match with a Kullback-Leibler divergence; it fits the stream morphology across ten free parameters and returns posteriors on progenitor mass, halo mass, inner slope $\gamma$, and orbital variables. The surface-brightness comparison relies on simulated stellar populations drawn from isochrones, including a Pal 5-like population that must be scaled to 20 times its mass to reproduce the observed brightness of the stream candidate.

What would settle it

Deep spectroscopy of the stream and the proposed parent cluster would settle the interpretation: if their radial velocities are inconsistent with the host galaxy's systemic velocity, or if the stream stars have a clearly different metallicity or age from the cluster, the stream interpretation fails. Alternatively, deeper HST or JWST imaging that resolves individual stars could show whether the feature's colour-magnitude diagram matches a single stellar population at the distance of UGC9050-Dw1.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the central claim is that the feature designated Oyashio is a genuine tidal stream produced by a disrupting globular cluster orbiting UGC9050-Dw1, and that its morphology can be used to constrain both the progenitor and the host dark matter halo. The evidence is assembled from four directions: the feature appears independently in HST and CFHT imaging, ruling out an imaging artefact; its width is comparable to Milky Way globular cluster streams and much narrower than known dwarf-galaxy streams; its integrated colour overlaps that of the adjacent globular cluster candidate, and both fall inside the host's globular cluster selection box; and X-Stream generative models reproduce the observed shape with a low-mass progenitor orbiting inside a massive dark halo. The modelling yields the first stream-based halo constraint for an ultra-diffuse galaxy, with a halo mass and inner slope pointing toward a relatively massive, somewhat cuspy dark matter halo, and a 95% upper limit on the initial progenitor mass of $M_{\mathrm{prog}} < 2.5 \times 10^6\,M_\odot$.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the thin feature is a coherent tidal stream at the distance of UGC9050-Dw1, physically associated with the adjacent compact source, and not a chance alignment or projection of unrelated or unresolved stars; the paper itself states that chance alignment or chance projection cannot be entirely ruled out.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the stream is real, globular cluster streams are detectable at distances of tens of megaparsecs in integrated light, not only in resolved Milky Way stars.
  • The first stream-based UDG halo constraint, $\log_{10}(M_{\mathrm{halo}}/M_\odot) = 11.31^{+0.67}_{-0.71}$, is consistent with previous halo mass estimates from globular cluster counts and with the total mass of the Large Magellanic Cloud.
  • A progenitor mass below $2.5 \times 10^6\,M_\odot$ points to a globular cluster rather than a dwarf galaxy progenitor, and the missing counter-arm is plausibly hidden behind the brighter central body of the UDG.
  • The same generative modelling approach can be applied to other ultra-diffuse galaxies imaged by HST, and future wide-field surveys with Euclid and Roman are expected to uncover many more such streams.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If Oyashio is confirmed, extragalactic globular cluster streams could probe dark matter substructure in a cleaner environment than the Milky Way, because UDGs contain comparatively few baryonic perturbers; the paper gestures at this but does not quantify the gain.
  • A testable extension is to rerun the same width, colour, and surface-brightness pipeline on archival HST fields of other UDGs; if Oyashio is one of many, the UDG halo mass versus inner-slope relation could be mapped without any spectroscopy.
  • The quoted 7.34 prominence measures only flux above background and not the prior probability that the feature is a stream, so an independent check would be deeper imaging that resolves individual stars and shows whether the stream and progenitor fall on a single isochrone at the host distance.
  • If the younger, bluer stellar population (8 Gyr, $[\mathrm{M/H}] = -1.0$) that gives the lowest viable progenitor mass is the right description, then at least some extragalactic globular cluster streams trace relatively young clusters, which would change predictions of how often such streams should be found.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 4 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports a thin, curved low-surface-brightness feature, named Oyashio, in HST ACS and CFHT imaging of the ultra-diffuse galaxy UGC9050-Dw1, and interprets it as a stellar stream from a disrupting globular cluster. The authors measure a width of 72.3±8.9 pc, colors consistent with the adjacent GC candidate, and a signal prominence of 7.34 in the combined HST image with A/√σA = 5.2. They use the X-Stream generative stream sampler to infer a progenitor mass upper limit Mprog < 2.5×10^6 Msun at 95% confidence and a halo scale mass log10 Mhalo = 11.31+0.67−0.71 with inner slope γ = 0.92+0.57−0.58, presenting these as the first stream-based halo constraints for an ultra-diffuse galaxy. The paper explicitly acknowledges that chance alignment or chance projection cannot be entirely ruled out and that the quoted significance measures only the flux excess above background, not the probability that the feature is a stream.

Significance. If the stream interpretation is correct, this would be the first extragalactic globular cluster stellar stream and would open a new observational window for probing dark matter in ultra-diffuse galaxies. The manuscript has clear strengths: the feature is seen independently in HST and CFHT data, the width and color arguments are quantitative, the mock-observation tests are a useful zeroth-order sanity check, and the data are publicly available. However, the central detection claim rests entirely on integrated-light photometry with no resolved stars, parallax, or spectroscopy, and the quoted significance is conditional on the feature being a stream. The dynamical modeling, while internally plausible, is built on the assumption that the feature is a stream and therefore cannot independently certify streamhood. The result is a promising candidate but the categorical claim in the title and abstract is stronger than the current evidence supports.

major comments (4)
  1. [Abstract and Methods, 'Data analysis'] The title and abstract state that Oyashio is the first extragalactic globular cluster stellar stream, but the quoted prominence of 7.34 and A/√σA = 5.2 are, as the Methods state, 'only the latter' of three probabilistic components; the probability that the feature is a stream and the probability of finding it are not quantified. The Discussion concedes that chance alignment or chance projection cannot be entirely ruled out. Because the discovery claim is the central result, the authors should either quantify the chance-projection probability (for example, by injecting synthetic curved features into the same images and measuring the false-positive rate) or consistently present the feature as a stream candidate until resolved-star or spectroscopic confirmation is available.
  2. [Generative stream models and Discussion] The X-Stream sampler is given control points drawn from a mask placed on the assumed stream and evaluates only particle-spray GC-stream models, so the resulting posterior constraints (Mprog < 2.5×10^6 Msun, log10 Mhalo = 11.31, γ = 0.92) are conditional on the feature being a GC stream. The Discussion's statement that agreement between the modeling results and GC-count halo mass estimates supports a GC stream detection is therefore circular. The authors should present these constraints as explicitly conditional on the stream interpretation and ideally compare against a dwarf-progenitor stream model fit to the same control points to test the alternative.
  3. [Extended Data Figure 2 and 'Data analysis'] The HST width is 72.3±8.9 pc while the CFHT g-band width is 183±36 pc; even after subtracting the 0.88 arcsec seeing (about 150 pc at the adopted distance) in quadrature, the CFHT width remains roughly 100 pc, larger than the HST value. The paper does not resolve this discrepancy, yet the adopted mask width of 143.7 pc and the width-based argument for a GC rather than dwarf progenitor both depend on the width measurement. The authors should quantify the PSF-deconvolved CFHT width and discuss why the HST and CFHT widths differ.
  4. [Methods, 'Generative stream models'] The central halo and progenitor constraints come from X-Stream, whose code is not public and whose method paper is authored by two co-authors (ref. [6]); the text also states that 'our results are dependent on the stream model escape conditions.' For a first-of-its-kind UDG halo constraint, this is a load-bearing reproducibility gap. The authors should make the code available or provide a complete reproducible implementation, and they should quantify the sensitivity of the posteriors to the chosen escape conditions.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Figure 1] The labels in Figure 1 contain typographical artifacts ('P(ogenito( GC candidate', 'Stella( )t(eam candidate') that should be corrected.
  2. [Data analysis] The statement that the feature is 'not detectable' in the u and z bands should be accompanied by the depth or upper-limit information for those bands, since non-detection may simply reflect shallower or lower-quality data rather than the intrinsic properties of the feature.
  3. [Discussion and Figure 3] The invocation of an unseen second stream arm to explain why only one side is detected is reasonable but should be framed explicitly as an additional assumption rather than a constraint from the data, especially because the model streams shown in Figure 3 produce a counter-arm that is not observed.
  4. [Data analysis, 'prominence' definition] The quantity (fstream − fbar)/σbackground = 7.34 is called a 'signal prominence' but it is not clearly defined as a number of Gaussian standard deviations; the units and the relation to the later A/√σA = 5.2 should be stated explicitly in the Methods.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the Oyashio detection and X-Stream halo constraints do not reduce to their inputs by construction; the statistical caveats are acknowledged limitations, not circular steps.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain is not circular. The detection of the thin feature is based on independent HST and CFHT imaging, and the quoted significance is explicitly separated from the prior probability that the feature is a stream: the Methods state that 'the statistical significance contains three main components: the probability that it is a stream, the probability that we would find it, and, given the first two statements are true, the statistical significance of the signal in the data. What we quote as a significance is only the latter.' This is an honest conditioning statement, not a circular redefinition. The dynamical constraints from X-Stream are produced by comparing simulated streams to control points generated from the observed mask via a KL-divergence likelihood, with broad flat priors on progenitor mass and halo mass; the resulting upper limit on Mprog and the halo mass posterior are not imposed by the input mask, whose width and geometry are data products. The surface-brightness-based lower-bound progenitor mass is derived from isochrone and IMF assumptions and then checked for consistency with the X-Stream posterior, which is an independent cross-check rather than a fitted parameter renamed as a prediction. The paper's reliance on the co-authored X-Stream code (ref. [6]) is a self-citation, and the non-public availability of that code is a reproducibility concern, but X-Stream is a separate generative-model method with stated assumptions (particle-spray escape conditions from Fardal et al., halo profiles parameterized by gamma, beta, and c) that do not include the UGC9050-Dw1 halo mass being inferred. The explicit caveat that 'chance alignment or chance projection cannot be entirely ruled out' and the statement that 'our results are dependent on the stream model escape conditions' are limitations on the statistical interpretation and model dependence, not circular reasoning. No equation or step in the paper reduces a claimed result to its own input by construction, so the central discovery claim and the halo constraints retain independent content.

Assumptions & free parameters 14 free parameters · 7 assumptions · 1 invented entities

Most of the free parameters are outputs of a generative fit to the projected stream morphology; they are not independent measurements. The X-Stream model, its escape conditions, the fixed halo concentration, the adopted distance, the globular-cluster identification, and the two-arm symmetry assumption are all load-bearing. The halo constraint therefore inherits every one of these assumptions and is best read as conditional on the stream interpretation.

free parameters (14)
  • log10 Mhalo (halo scale mass) = 11.31 +0.67/-0.71 (68%); M200 = 11.63 +0.71/-0.83
    Fitted by X-Stream to the stream morphology; the central halo mass result of the paper.
  • gamma (inner density slope) = 0.92 +0.57/-0.58 (68%)
    Inner slope of the double-power-law halo, fitted jointly with Mhalo; used to compare with other UDGs.
  • log10 Mprog (progenitor mass) = < 6.4 at 95% (< 2.5e6 Msun)
    Upper limit from the stream fit; used to argue the progenitor is a globular cluster rather than a dwarf galaxy.
  • yprog (line-of-sight position) = -0.2 +3.5/-3.3 kpc (68%)
    Free parameter in the X-Stream fit; constrained by morphology.
  • v (velocity magnitude) = 120 +51/-53 km/s (68%)
    Free orbital parameter in the fit.
  • vtheta and vphi (velocity directions) = 1.1 +0.1/-0.2 and 0.4 +0.4/-0.3
    Free orbital direction parameters in the fit; only half of the velocity sphere is sampled due to known degeneracies.
  • rs (halo scale radius) = 5.7 +2.7/-2.6 kpc (68%)
    Free parameter; the paper notes the scale radius is unconstrained.
  • beta (outer density slope) = 2.9 +0.7/-0.7
    Free parameter; the paper notes the outer slope is unconstrained.
  • tage (stream age) = 1.38 +0.69/-0.69 Gyr
    Free parameter in the stream model; constrained mostly as an upper or lower limit.
  • mask width = 143.7 pc fiducial; 185 pc test
    Hand-chosen width around the stream used to define control points; results are stated to be insensitive to it.
  • halo concentration c = 5 fiducial; 2 test
    Fixed by hand based on literature values, not fitted; the paper reports no material difference between the c=2 and c=5 runs.
  • lower-bound isochrone (age, metallicity) = 8 Gyr, [M/H] = -1.0
    Chosen from an isochrone grid to match the observed stream surface brightness; yields the 1.65e5 Msun lower mass bound.
  • Pal 5-like mass multiplier = 20
    Chosen because 20 times the Pal 5 stellar population reproduces the observed surface brightness; used to motivate a progenitor near 2e6 Msun.
  • stream-to-total mass ratio proxy = 0.75
    Assumed from the cluster/stream brightness ratio with two identical arms; used to scale stream mass to total progenitor mass.
assumptions (7)
  • domain assumption UGC9050-Dw1 is at distance 35.2 +/- 2.5 Mpc and is associated with the low-surface-brightness galaxy UGC 9050.
    Adopted from references [17,18]. All physical widths, luminosities, and halo masses scale with this distance. Used in Figure 1 and throughout the analysis.
  • domain assumption The dark matter halo is spherical and described by the double-power-law profile of X-Stream with fixed concentration c=5, and baryons are negligible.
    Stated in Generative stream models: 'We do not include the baryons... The dark matter halo profile is thus treated as a representation of the entire diffuse dwarf.' If the halo is not spherical or baryons matter at the stream radius, the inferred Mhalo and gamma are biased.
  • domain assumption Particle-spray models with the fixed escape conditions of reference [64] reproduce the tidal disruption of a globular cluster in this regime.
    The Methods state 'our results are dependent on the stream model escape conditions' and that particle-spray simulations are tuned to reproduce more expensive N-body simulations. The tuning comes from references [6,64,65], including self-cited work.
  • domain assumption The compact source next to the stream is a globular cluster belonging to UGC9050-Dw1.
    The object was excluded from the Fielder et al. GC sample on roundness, sharpness, and magnitude grounds; the authors attribute this to tidal disruption. The cluster identification underpins the stream interpretation.
  • domain assumption Integrated-light colours can be compared across the stream, the candidate cluster, and other GCs after background subtraction.
    Used in Figure 2. The Methods state that the measured colour is significantly affected by the choice of background area, so the colour agreement is not a strong discriminator by itself.
  • domain assumption The two stream arms are identical, so the hidden arm has the same stellar mass and brightness as the observed one.
    Methods: 'Assuming that the two stream arms are identical, this gives a ratio of M_stream/M_total ~ 0.75.' The hidden arm is not detected; this assumption sets the mass normalization.
  • domain assumption The observed feature is a coherent structure at the distance of UGC9050-Dw1 rather than a chance projection of unrelated or unresolved stars.
    The Discussion states 'chance alignment or chance projection cannot be entirely ruled out.' This is the load-bearing assumption for calling the feature a stellar stream.
invented entities (1)
  • Unseen second stream arm
    purpose: Used to compute total stream mass (M_stream/Mtotal = 0.75), to normalize mock stream populations, and to explain why only one arm is detected by assuming the other wraps behind the UDG centre.
    No direct detection of the second arm is reported. Its existence and equal brightness are inferred from the interpretation of the observed feature as a tidal stream. If the feature is not a stream, the arm does not exist.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Evidence for the First Globular Cluster Stellar Stream beyond the Milky Way." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/2ZJXHGT6

@misc{pith2026260812254,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Evidence for the First Globular Cluster Stellar Stream beyond the Milky Way},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/2ZJXHGT6}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2608.12254}
}
read the original abstract

The dark matter content of ultra-diffuse galaxies is the subject of considerable debate. Stellar streams, which form when a host galaxy tidally strips stars from an orbiting stellar system, provide a powerful technique to constrain the dark matter content of external galaxies. The stripped stars form long, thin leading and trailing tidal arms that persist for billions of years. Stellar streams from globular clusters are particularly sensitive probes of dark matter halos and substructure. Globular cluster streams are expected to exist in a variety of host galaxy types, but so far, they have only been observed in the Milky Way. We present evidence for the first extragalactic globular cluster stellar stream, identified in deep Hubble Space Telescope imaging of the ultra-diffuse galaxy, UGC9050-Dw1. The stream's morphology, colour, and apparent association with a compact source support the globular cluster progenitor interpretation observationally, and we reproduce the observed surface brightness with simulated globular cluster stellar populations. We use generative stream modelling, which fits dynamical models directly to the stream morphology, to constrain the mass of the progenitor and present the first stream-based halo constraint for an ultra-diffuse galaxy. The stream models point to a globular cluster origin and suggest a massive dark matter host halo. By extending the reach of globular cluster stream analysis to external galaxies, this work opens a new chapter in dark matter science.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

71 extracted references · 21 canonical work pages

  1. [6]

    The Astrophysical Journal 1002(2), 204 (2026) https: //doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ae5bb0

    Nibauer, J., Pearson, S.: Testing dark matter with generative models for extra- galactic stellar streams. The Astrophysical Journal 1002(2), 204 (2026) https: //doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ae5bb0

    doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ae5bb0 2026

  2. [1]

    ApJ 828(1), 6 (2016) https://doi.org/10.3847/2041-8205/828/1/L6 arXiv:1606.06291 [astro- ph.GA]

    van Dokkum, P., Abraham, R., Brodie, J., Conroy, C., Danieli, S., Merritt, A., Mowla, L., Romanowsky, A., Zhang, J.: A High Stellar Velocity Dispersion and ∼100 Globular Clusters for the Ultra-diffuse Galaxy Dragonfly 44. ApJ 828(1), 6 (2016) https://doi.org/10.3847/2041-8205/828/1/L6 arXiv:1606.06291 [astro- ph.GA]

    arXiv 2016

  3. [2]

    Reconciling mass-estimates of ultra-diffuse galaxies

    Laporte, C.F.P., Agnello, A., Navarro, J.F.: Reconciling mass estimates of ultrad- iffuse galaxies. MNRAS 484(1), 245–251 (2019) https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/ sty2891 arXiv:1804.04139 [astro-ph.GA]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2019

  4. [3]

    The Open Journal of Astrophysics 7, 117 (2024) https://doi.org/10.33232/001c.127487

    Kravtsov, A.: On the dark matter content of ultra-diffuse galaxies. The Open Journal of Astrophysics 7, 117 (2024) https://doi.org/10.33232/001c.127487

    doi:10.33232/001c.127487 2024

  5. [4]

    van Dokkum, P., Wasserman, A., Danieli, S., Abraham, R., Brodie, J., Conroy, C., Forbes, D.A., Martin, C., Matuszewski, M., Romanowsky, A.J., Villaume, A.: Spatially Resolved Stellar Kinematics of the Ultra-diffuse Galaxy Drag- onfly 44. I. Observations, Kinematics, and Cold Dark Matter Halo Fits. ApJ 880(2), 91 (2019) https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ab...

    arXiv 2019

  6. [5]

    Brook, C.B., Di Cintio, A., Macciò, A.V., Blank, M.: A Shallow Dark Matter Halo in Ultra-diffuse Galaxy AGC 242019: Are UDGs Structurally Similar to Low-surface-brightness Galaxies? ApJ 919(1), 1 (2021) https://doi.org/10.3847/ 2041-8213/ac236a arXiv:2109.01402 [astro-ph.GA]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2021

  7. [7]

    MNRAS 466(1), 628–668 (2017) https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stw3067 arXiv:1606.03470 [astro-ph.GA]

    Bovy, J., Erkal, D., Sanders, J.L.: Linear perturbation theory for tidal streams and the small-scale CDM power spectrum. MNRAS 466(1), 628–668 (2017) https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stw3067 arXiv:1606.03470 [astro-ph.GA]

    arXiv 2017

  8. [8]

    ApJ 867(2), 101 (2018) https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/aae4da arXiv:1804.06854 20 [astro-ph.GA]

    Bonaca, A., Hogg, D.W.: The Information Content in Cold Stellar Streams. ApJ 867(2), 101 (2018) https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/aae4da arXiv:1804.06854 20 [astro-ph.GA]

    arXiv 2018

Show all 71 references
  1. [9]

    ApJ 880(1), 38 (2019) https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ab2873 arXiv:1811.03631 [astro-ph.GA]

    Bonaca, A., Hogg, D.W., Price-Whelan, A.M., Conroy, C.: The Spur and the Gap in GD-1: Dynamical Evidence for a Dark Substructure in the Milky Way Halo. ApJ 880(1), 38 (2019) https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ab2873 arXiv:1811.03631 [astro-ph.GA]

    2019 arXiv

  2. [10]

    arXiv e-prints, 2510–02247 (2025) https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2510

    Nibauer, J., Bonaca, A., Price-Whelan, A.M., Spergel, D.N., Greene, J.E.: Mea- surement of Dark Matter Substructure from the Kinematics of the GD-1 Stellar Stream. arXiv e-prints, 2510–02247 (2025) https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2510. 02247 arXiv:2510.02247 [astro-ph.GA]

    2025 doi arXiv

  3. [11]

    ApJ 976(1), 54 (2024) https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ad8348 arXiv:2405.15851 [astro-ph.GA]

    Pearson, S., Bonaca, A., Chen, Y., Gnedin, O.Y.: Forecasting the Population of Globular Cluster Streams in Milky Way–type Galaxies. ApJ 976(1), 54 (2024) https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ad8348 arXiv:2405.15851 [astro-ph.GA]

    2024 arXiv

  4. [12]

    ApJ 978(1), 33 (2025) https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ad932d arXiv:2408.07124 [astro-ph.GA]

    Le, M.N., Cooper, A.P.: Globular Cluster Counts around 700 Nearby Galaxies. ApJ 978(1), 33 (2025) https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ad932d arXiv:2408.07124 [astro-ph.GA]

    2025 arXiv

  5. [13]

    Bothun, G.D., Impey, C.D., Malin, D.F., Mould, J.R.: Discovery of a Huge Low- Surface-Brightness Galaxy: A Proto-Disk Galaxy at Low Redshift? AJ 94, 23 (1987) https://doi.org/10.1086/114443

    1987 doi

  6. [14]

    AJ 114, 635–654 (1997) https://doi.org/10.1086/118499 arXiv:astro-ph/9705088 [astro-ph]

    Dalcanton, J.J., Spergel, D.N., Gunn, J.E., Schmidt, M., Schneider, D.P.: The Number Density of Low-Surface Brightness Galaxies with 23 < mu_0 < 25 V Mag/arcsec2̂. AJ 114, 635–654 (1997) https://doi.org/10.1086/118499 arXiv:astro-ph/9705088 [astro-ph]

    1997 arXiv

  7. [15]

    ApJ 798(2), 45 (2015) https://doi.org/10.1088/2041-8205/798/2/L45 arXiv:1410.8141 [astro-ph.GA]

    van Dokkum, P.G., Abraham, R., Merritt, A., Zhang, J., Geha, M., Con- roy, C.: Forty-seven Milky Way-sized, Extremely Diffuse Galaxies in the Coma Cluster. ApJ 798(2), 45 (2015) https://doi.org/10.1088/2041-8205/798/2/L45 arXiv:1410.8141 [astro-ph.GA]

    2015 arXiv

  8. [16]

    Forbes, D.A., Gannon, J.S.: Do Ultra-Diffuse Galaxies Follow the Globular Cluster - Halo Mass Relation? MNRAS (2025) https://doi.org/10.1093/mnrasl/ slaf084 arXiv:2507.20687 [astro-ph.GA]

    2025 arXiv

  9. [17]

    ApJ 954(2), 39 (2023) https://doi.org/10

    Fielder, C.E., Jones, M.G., Sand, D.J., Bennet, P., Crnojević, D., Karunakaran, A., Mutlu-Pakdil, B., Spekkens, K.: The Disturbed and Globular-cluster-rich Ultradiffuse Galaxy UGC 9050-Dw1. ApJ 954(2), 39 (2023) https://doi.org/10. 3847/2041-8213/acf0c3 arXiv:2306.06164 [astro-ph.GA]

    2023 arXiv

  10. [18]

    Mould, J.R., Huchra, J.P., Freedman, W.L., Kennicutt, R.C. Jr., Ferrarese, L., Ford, H.C., Gibson, B.K., Graham, J.A., Hughes, S.M.G., Illingworth, G.D., Kel- son, D.D., Macri, L.M., Madore, B.F., Sakai, S., Sebo, K.M., Silbermann, N.A., 21 Stetson, P.B.: The Hubble Space Tele...

    2000 arXiv

  11. [19]

    ApJ 850(1), 109 (2017) https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/aa9180 arXiv:1710.01728 [astro- ph.GA]

    Bennet, P., Sand, D.J., Crnojević, D., Spekkens, K., Zaritsky, D., Karunakaran, A.: Discovery of Diffuse Dwarf Galaxy Candidates around M101. ApJ 850(1), 109 (2017) https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/aa9180 arXiv:1710.01728 [astro- ph.GA]

    2017 arXiv

  12. [20]

    ApJ 862(2), 114 (2018) https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/aacdab arXiv:1801.03097 [astro-ph.GA]

    Shipp, N., Drlica-Wagner, A., Balbinot, E., Ferguson, P., Erkal, D., Li, T.S., Bechtol, K., Belokurov, V., Buncher, B., Carollo, D., Carrasco Kind, M., Kuehn, K., Marshall, J.L., Pace, A.B., Rykoff, E.S., Sevilla-Noarbe, I., Sheldon, E., Strigari, L., Vivas, A.K., Yanny, B., Z...

    2018 arXiv

  13. [21]

    New Astron

    Bonaca, A., Price-Whelan, A.M.: Stellar streams in the Gaia era. New Astron. Rev. 100, 101713 (2025) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.newar.2024.101713 arXiv:2405.19410 [astro-ph.GA]

    2025

  14. [22]

    MNRAS 521(4), 4936–4962 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1093/ mnras/stad551 arXiv:2211.04495 [astro-ph.GA]

    Koposov, S.E., Erkal, D., Li, T.S., Da Costa, G.S., Cullinane, L.R., Ji, A.P., Kuehn, K., Lewis, G.F., Pace, A.B., Shipp, N., Zucker, D.B., Bland-Hawthorn, J., Lilleengen, S., Martell, S.L., S5 Collaboration: S 5: Probing the Milky Way and Magellanic Clouds potentials with the...

    2023 arXiv

  15. [23]

    AJ 112, 1487 (1996) https://doi.org/10.1086/118116

    Harris, W.E.: A Catalog of Parameters for Globular Clusters in the Milky Way. AJ 112, 1487 (1996) https://doi.org/10.1086/118116

    1996 doi

  16. [24]

    AJ 121(6), 2974– 2998 (2001) https://doi.org/10.1086/321081 arXiv:astro-ph/0102374 [astro-ph] 22

    Larsen, S.S., Brodie, J.P., Huchra, J.P., Forbes, D.A., Grillmair, C.J.: Properties of Globular Cluster Systems in Nearby Early-Type Galaxies. AJ 121(6), 2974– 2998 (2001) https://doi.org/10.1086/321081 arXiv:astro-ph/0102374 [astro-ph] 22

    2001 arXiv

  17. [25]

    MNRAS 478(2), 1520–1557 (2018) https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/sty1057 arXiv:1804.08359 [astro-ph.GA]

    Baumgardt, H., Hilker, M.: A catalogue of masses, structural parame- ters, and velocity dispersion profiles of 112 Milky Way globular clus- ters. MNRAS 478(2), 1520–1557 (2018) https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/sty1057 arXiv:1804.08359 [astro-ph.GA]

    2018 arXiv

  18. [26]

    Nature Astronomy 3, 667–672 (2019) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41550-019-0751-x arXiv:1902.09544 [astro-ph.GA]

    Ibata, R.A., Bellazzini, M., Malhan, K., Martin, N., Bianchini, P.: Identification of the long stellar stream of the prototypical massive globular cluster ω Centauri. Nature Astronomy 3, 667–672 (2019) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41550-019-0751-x arXiv:1902.09544 [astro-ph.GA]

    2019 arXiv

  19. [27]

    MNRAS 528(4), 6010– 6024 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stae282 arXiv:2401.13918 [astro- ph.GA]

    Usher, C., Caldwell, N., Cabrera-Ziri, I.: Measuring M31 globular cluster ages and metallicities using both photometry and spectroscopy. MNRAS 528(4), 6010– 6024 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stae282 arXiv:2401.13918 [astro- ph.GA]

    2024 arXiv

  20. [28]

    Odenkirchen, M., Grebel, E.K., Rockosi, C.M., Dehnen, W., Ibata, R., Rix, H.- W., Stolte, A., Wolf, C., Anderson, J.E. Jr., Bahcall, N.A., Brinkmann, J., Csabai, I., Hennessy, G., Hindsley, R.B., Ivezić, Ž., Lupton, R.H., Munn, J.A., Pier, J.R., Stoughton, C., York, D.G.: Dete...

    2001 arXiv

  21. [29]

    Planck Collaboration, Aghanim, N., Akrami, Y., Ashdown, M., Aumont, J., Baccigalupi, C., Ballardini, M., Banday, A.J., Barreiro, R.B., Bartolo, N., al.: Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters. A&A 641, 6 (2020) https: //doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201833910 arXiv:1807....

    2020 arXiv

  22. [30]

    ApJ 552(1), 23–26 (2001) https://doi.org/ 10.1086/320262 arXiv:astro-ph/0103102 [astro-ph]

    de Blok, W.J.G., McGaugh, S.S., Bosma, A., Rubin, V.C.: Mass Density Profiles of Low Surface Brightness Galaxies. ApJ 552(1), 23–26 (2001) https://doi.org/ 10.1086/320262 arXiv:astro-ph/0103102 [astro-ph]

    2001 arXiv

  23. [31]

    MNRAS 456(1), 54–58 (2016) https://doi.org/10.1093/mnrasl/slv160 arXiv:1507.03594 [astro-ph.GA]

    Peñarrubia, J., Gómez, F.A., Besla, G., Erkal, D., Ma, Y.-Z.: A timing constraint on the (total) mass of the Large Magellanic Cloud. MNRAS 456(1), 54–58 (2016) https://doi.org/10.1093/mnrasl/slv160 arXiv:1507.03594 [astro-ph.GA]

    2016 arXiv

  24. [32]

    MNRAS 487(2), 2685–2700 (2019) https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stz1371 arXiv:1812.08192 [astro-ph.GA]

    Erkal, D., Belokurov, V., Laporte, C.F.P., Koposov, S.E., Li, T.S., Grillmair, C.J., Kallivayalil, N., Price-Whelan, A.M., Evans, N.W., Hawkins, K., Hendel, D., Mateu, C., Navarro, J.F., del Pino, A., Slater, C.T., Sohn, S.T., Orphan Aspen Treasury Collaboration: The total mas...

    2019 arXiv

  25. [33]

    ApJ 941(1), 19 (2022) https://doi.org/10.3847/ 1538-4357/ac9bfb arXiv:2205.12277 [astro-ph.GA] 23

    Pearson, S., Price-Whelan, A.M., Hogg, D.W., Seth, A.C., Sand, D.J., Hunt, J.A.S., Crnojević, D.: Mapping Dark Matter with Extragalactic Stellar Streams: The Case of Centaurus A. ApJ 941(1), 19 (2022) https://doi.org/10.3847/ 1538-4357/ac9bfb arXiv:2205.12277 [astro-ph.GA] 23

    2022 arXiv

  26. [34]

    Ibata, R.A., Lewis, G.F., Thomas, G., Martin, N.F., Chapman, S.: Feeling the Pull: A Study of Natural Galactic Accelerometers. II. Kinematics and Mass of the Delicate Stellar Stream of the Palomar 5 Globular Cluster. ApJ 842(2), 120 (2017) https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/aa7...

    2017 arXiv

  27. [35]

    Nature 640(8060), 902– 906 (2025) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-025-08783-9 arXiv:2504.06749 [astro- ph.GA]

    Poulain, M., Smith, R., Duc, P.-A., Marleau, F.R., Habas, R., Durrell, P.R., Fensch, J., Lim, S., Müller, O., Paudel, S., Sánchez-Janssen, R.: Evidence of star cluster migration and merger in dwarf galaxies. Nature 640(8060), 902– 906 (2025) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-025-...

    2025 arXiv

  28. [36]

    Research Notes of the American Astronomical Society 2(2), 16 (2018) https://doi.org/10.3847/2515-5172/aac087 arXiv:1805.00017 [astro-ph.GA]

    Abraham, R., Danieli, S., van Dokkum, P., Conroy, C., Kruijssen, J.M.D., Cohen, Y., Merritt, A., Zhang, J., Lokhorst, D., Mowla, L., Brodie, J., Romanowsky, A.J., Janssens, S.: The Maybe Stream: A Possible Cold Stellar Stream in the Ultra-diffuse Galaxy NGC1052-DF2. Research N...

    2018 arXiv

  29. [37]

    ApJ 883(1), 87 (2019) https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ ab3e06 arXiv:1906.03264 [astro-ph.GA]

    Pearson, S., Starkenburg, T.K., Johnston, K.V., Williams, B.F., Ibata, R.A., Khan, R.: Detecting Thin Stellar Streams in External Galaxies: Resolved Stars and Integrated Light. ApJ 883(1), 87 (2019) https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ ab3e06 arXiv:1906.03264 [astro-ph.GA]

    2019 arXiv

  30. [38]

    ApJ 954(2), 195 (2023) https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ace9bc arXiv:2303.17406 [astro- ph.GA]

    Nibauer, J., Bonaca, A., Johnston, K.V.: Constraining the Gravitational Poten- tial from the Projected Morphology of Extragalactic Tidal Streams. ApJ 954(2), 195 (2023) https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ace9bc arXiv:2303.17406 [astro- ph.GA]

    2023 arXiv

  31. [39]

    ApJ 926(2), 166 (2022) https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ ac4496 arXiv:2107.00017 [astro-ph.GA]

    Pearson, S., Clark, S.E., Demirjian, A.J., Johnston, K.V., Ness, M.K., Starken- burg, T.K., Williams, B.F., Ibata, R.A.: The Hough Stream Spotter: A New Method for Detecting Linear Structure in Resolved Stars and Application to the Stellar Halo of M31. ApJ 926(2), 166 (2022) h...

    2022 arXiv

  32. [40]

    MNRAS 435(1), 378–399 (2013) https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stt1307 arXiv:1211.4522 [astro-ph.GA]

    Sanderson, R.E., Helmi, A.: An analytical phase-space model for tidal caus- tics. MNRAS 435(1), 378–399 (2013) https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stt1307 arXiv:1211.4522 [astro-ph.GA]

    2013 arXiv

  33. [41]

    Science 84(2188), 506–507 (1936) https://doi.org/10.1126/science

    Einstein, A.: Lens-Like Action of a Star by the Deviation of Light in the Gravita- tional Field. Science 84(2188), 506–507 (1936) https://doi.org/10.1126/science. 84.2188.506

    1936 doi

  34. [42]

    General Relativity and Gravitation 50(4), 42 (2018) https://doi

    Cunha, P.V.P., Herdeiro, C.A.R.: Shadows and strong gravitational lensing: a brief review. General Relativity and Gravitation 50(4), 42 (2018) https://doi. org/10.1007/s10714-018-2361-9 arXiv:1801.00860 [gr-qc] 24

    2018 arXiv

  35. [43]

    MNRAS 539(2), 674–689 (2025) https: //doi.org/10.1093/mnras/staf559 arXiv:2504.03132 [astro-ph.GA]

    Haacke, L., Forbes, D.A., Gannon, J.S., Danieli, S., Brodie, J.P., Pfeffer, J., Romanowsky, A.J., van Dokkum, P., Janssens, S.R., Buzzo, M.L., al.: Inves- tigating the Ultra-diffuse Galaxy NGC5846_UDG1 through the Kinematics of its Rich Globular Cluster System. MNRAS 539(2), 6...

    2025 arXiv

  36. [44]

    ApJ 909(1), 20 (2021) https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/abd777 arXiv:2101.01282 [astro-ph.GA]

    Shi, Y., Zhang, Z.-Y., Wang, J., Chen, J., Gu, Q., Yu, X., Li, S.: A Cuspy Dark Matter Halo. ApJ 909(1), 20 (2021) https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/abd777 arXiv:2101.01282 [astro-ph.GA]

    2021 arXiv

  37. [45]

    ApJ 940(1), 22 (2022) https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ac93ee arXiv:2205.11767 [astro-ph.GA]

    Nibauer, J., Belokurov, V., Cranmer, M., Goodman, J., Ho, S.: Charting Galactic Accelerations with Stellar Streams and Machine Learning. ApJ 940(1), 22 (2022) https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ac93ee arXiv:2205.11767 [astro-ph.GA]

    2022 arXiv

  38. [46]

    Nature 454(7205), 735–738 (2008) https://doi.org/10.1038/nature07153 arXiv:0805.1244 [astro-ph]

    Diemand, J., Kuhlen, M., Madau, P., Zemp, M., Moore, B., Potter, D., Stadel, J.: Clumps and streams in the local dark matter distribution. Nature 454(7205), 735–738 (2008) https://doi.org/10.1038/nature07153 arXiv:0805.1244 [astro-ph]

    2008 arXiv

  39. [47]

    ARA&A 55(1), 343–387 (2017) https://doi.org/10.1146/ annurev-astro-091916-055313 arXiv:1707.04256 [astro-ph.CO]

    Bullock, J.S., Boylan-Kolchin, M.: Small-Scale Challenges to the ΛCDM Paradigm. ARA&A 55(1), 343–387 (2017) https://doi.org/10.1146/ annurev-astro-091916-055313 arXiv:1707.04256 [astro-ph.CO]

    2017 arXiv

  40. [48]

    MNRAS 484(2), 2009–2020 (2019) https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/ stz142 arXiv:1809.09640 [astro-ph.GA]

    Banik, N., Bovy, J.: Effects of baryonic and dark matter substructure on the Pal 5 stream. MNRAS 484(2), 2009–2020 (2019) https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/ stz142 arXiv:1809.09640 [astro-ph.GA]

    2019 arXiv

  41. [49]

    arXiv e-prints, 1503–03757 (2015) https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1503

    Spergel, D., Gehrels, N., Baltay, C., Bennett, D., Breckinridge, J., Donahue, M., Dressler, A., Gaudi, B.S., Greene, T., Guyon, O., Hirata, C., Kalirai, J., Kasdin, N.J., Macintosh, B., Moos, W., Perlmutter, S., Postman, M., Rauscher, B., Rhodes, J., Wang, Y., Weinberg, D., Be...

    2015 doi arXiv

  42. [50]

    In: MacEwen, H.A., Fazio, G.G., Lystrup, M., 25 Batalha, N., Siegler, N., Tong, E.C

    Racca, G.D., Laureijs, R., Stagnaro, L., Salvignol, J.-C., Lorenzo Alvarez, J., Saavedra Criado, G., Gaspar Venancio, L., Short, A., Strada, P., Bönke, T., Colombo, C., Calvi, A., Maiorano, E., Piersanti, O., Prezelus, S., Rosato, P., Pinel, J., Rozemeijer, H., Lesna, V., Musi...

    2016

  43. [51]

    ApJ 962(2), 151 (2024) https://doi.org/10.3847/ 1538-4357/ad159c arXiv:2305.12045 [astro-ph.GA]

    Aganze, C., Pearson, S., Starkenburg, T., Contardo, G., Johnston, K.V., Tavan- gar, K., Price-Whelan, A.M., Burgasser, A.J.: Prospects for Detecting Gaps in Globular Cluster Stellar Streams in External Galaxies with the Nancy Grace Roman Space Telescope. ApJ 962(2), 151 (2024)...

    2024 arXiv

  44. [52]

    Cycle 29, ID

    Sand, D.J., Bennet, P., Crnojevic, D., Jones, M.G., Karunakaran, A., Mutlu- Pakdil, B., Spekkens, K.: Ultra-Diffuse Galaxy Formation in Groups - Tidal or Born That Way? HST Proposal. Cycle 29, ID. #16890 (2021)

    2021

  45. [53]

    AJ 143(2), 38 (2012) https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-6256/ 143/2/38 arXiv:1101.1084 [astro-ph.CO]

    Gwyn, S.D.J.: The Canada-France-Hawaii Telescope Legacy Survey: Stacked Images and Catalogs. AJ 143(2), 38 (2012) https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-6256/ 143/2/38 arXiv:1101.1084 [astro-ph.CO]

    2012 arXiv

  46. [54]

    ApJ 789(1), 82 (2014) https://doi.org/10.1088/ 0004-637X/789/1/82 arXiv:1312.1338 [astro-ph.GA]

    Clark, S.E., Peek, J.E.G., Putman, M.E.: Magnetically Aligned H I Fibers and the Rolling Hough Transform. ApJ 789(1), 82 (2014) https://doi.org/10.1088/ 0004-637X/789/1/82 arXiv:1312.1338 [astro-ph.GA]

    2014 arXiv

  47. [55]

    The Journal of Open Source Software 2(18) (2017) https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.00388

    Price-Whelan, A.M.: Gala: A python package for galactic dynamics. The Journal of Open Source Software 2(18) (2017) https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.00388

    2017 doi

  48. [56]

    AJ 156(3), 123 (2018) https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-3881/aabc4f arXiv:1801.02634 [astro-ph.IM]

    Astropy Collaboration, Price-Whelan, A.M., Sipőcz, B.M., Günther, H.M., Lim, P.L., Crawford, S.M., Conseil, S., Shupe, D.L., Craig, M.W., Dencheva, N., Gins- burg, A., VanderPlas, J.T., Bradley, L.D., Pérez-Suárez, D., de Val-Borro, M., Aldcroft, T.L., Cruz, K.L., Robitaille, ...

    2018 arXiv

  49. [57]

    Johnson, L.C., Seth, A.C., Dalcanton, J.J., Caldwell, N., Fouesneau, M., Goulier- mis, D.A., Hodge, P.W., Larsen, S.S., Olsen, K.A.G., San Roman, I., al.: PHAT Stellar Cluster Survey. I. Year 1 Catalog and Integrated Photometry. ApJ 752(2), 95 (2012) https://doi.org/10.1088/00...

    2012 arXiv

  50. [58]

    ApJ 737(2), 103 (2011) https: //doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/737/2/103 arXiv:1012.4804 [astro-ph.GA]

    Schlafly, E.F., Finkbeiner, D.P.: Measuring Reddening with Sloan Digital Sky Survey Stellar Spectra and Recalibrating SFD. ApJ 737(2), 103 (2011) https: //doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/737/2/103 arXiv:1012.4804 [astro-ph.GA]

    2011 arXiv

  51. [59]

    ApJ 889(1), 70 (2020) https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ab5afe arXiv:1910.00592 [astro-ph.GA]

    Bonaca, A., Pearson, S., Price-Whelan, A.M., Dey, A., Geha, M., Kallivayalil, N., Moustakas, J., Muñoz, R., Myers, A.D., Schlegel, D.J., Valdes, F.: Varia- tions in the Width, Density, and Direction of the Palomar 5 Tidal Tails. ApJ 889(1), 70 (2020) https://doi.org/10.3847/15...

    2020 arXiv

  52. [60]

    ARA&A 44(1), 193–267 (2006) https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.astro.44

    Brodie, J.P., Strader, J.: Extragalactic Globular Clusters and Galaxy Forma- tion. ARA&A 44(1), 193–267 (2006) https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.astro.44. 051905.092441 arXiv:astro-ph/0602601 [astro-ph]

    2006

  53. [61]

    AJ 122(6), 3231–3238 (2001) https://doi.org/10.1086/323916 arXiv:astro-ph/0110411 [astro-ph]

    Grillmair, C.J., Smith, G.H.: The Main-Sequence Luminosity Function of Palo- mar 5 from THE HUBBLE SPACE TELESCOPE. AJ 122(6), 3231–3238 (2001) https://doi.org/10.1086/323916 arXiv:astro-ph/0110411 [astro-ph]

    2001 arXiv

  54. [62]

    Osservatorio Astronomico di Padova

    Leo, G.: CMD 3.9 input form. Osservatorio Astronomico di Padova. https://stev. oapd.inaf.it/cgi-bin/cmd

  55. [63]

    MNRAS 452(1), 1068–1080 (2015) https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stv1281 arXiv:1506.01681 [astro-ph.SR]

    Chen, Y., Bressan, A., Girardi, L., Marigo, P., Kong, X., Lanza, A.: PARSEC evolutionary tracks of massive stars up to 350 M ⊙ at metallicities 0.0001 ≤ Z ≤ 0.04. MNRAS 452(1), 1068–1080 (2015) https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stv1281 arXiv:1506.01681 [astro-ph.SR]

    2015 arXiv

  56. [64]

    MNRAS 452(1), 301–319 (2015) https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/ stv1198 arXiv:1410.1861 [astro-ph.GA]

    Fardal, M.A., Huang, S., Weinberg, M.D.: Generation of mock tidal streams. MNRAS 452(1), 301–319 (2015) https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/ stv1198 arXiv:1410.1861 [astro-ph.GA]

    2015 arXiv

  57. [65]

    ApJ 983(1), 68 (2025) https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/adb8e8 arXiv:2410.21174 [astro-ph.GA]

    Nibauer, J., Bonaca, A., Spergel, D.N., Price-Whelan, A.M., Greene, J.E., Stark- man, N., Johnston, K.V.: StreamSculptor: Hamiltonian Perturbation Theory 27 for Stellar Streams in Flexible Potentials with Differentiable Simulations. ApJ 983(1), 68 (2025) https://doi.org/10.384...

    2025 arXiv

  58. [66]

    The Annals of Mathematical Statistics 22(1), 79–86 (1951) https://doi.org/10.1214/aoms/ 1177729694

    Kullback, S., Leibler, R.A.: On information and sufficiency. The Annals of Mathematical Statistics 22(1), 79–86 (1951) https://doi.org/10.1214/aoms/ 1177729694

    1951 doi

  59. [67]

    ApJ 801(2), 98 (2015) https://doi.org/ 10.1088/0004-637X/801/2/98 arXiv:1404.6534 [astro-ph.GA]

    Sanderson, R.E., Helmi, A., Hogg, D.W.: Action-space Clustering of Tidal Streams to Infer the Galactic Potential. ApJ 801(2), 98 (2015) https://doi.org/ 10.1088/0004-637X/801/2/98 arXiv:1404.6534 [astro-ph.GA]

    2015 arXiv

  60. [68]

    Spacetelescop.github notebook (2024)

    Revalski, M.: Empirical Models for the WFC3/IR PSF. Spacetelescop.github notebook (2024)

    2024

  61. [69]

    Instrument Science Report WFC3 2016-12, 42 pages (2016)

    Anderson, J.: Empirical Models for the WFC3/IR PSF. Instrument Science Report WFC3 2016-12, 42 pages (2016)

    2016

  62. [70]

    https: //doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4159870

    Price-Whelan, A., Sipőcz, B., Lenz, D., Greco, J., Starkman, N., Foreman- Mackey, D., Lim, P.L., Oh, S., Koposov, S., Major, S.: Adrn/gala: V1.3. https: //doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4159870 . https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4159870

    doi

  63. [71]

    http://github.com/ jax-ml/jax 28

    Bradbury, J., Frostig, R., Hawkins, P., Johnson, M.J., Leary, C., Maclaurin, D., Necula, G., Paszke, A., VanderPlas, J., Wanderman-Milne, S., Zhang, Q.: JAX: Composable Transformations of Python+NumPy programs. http://github.com/ jax-ml/jax 28

Pith tools

Reviewed August 16, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.