Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Galaxy Zoo: Morphologies based on UKIDSS NIR Imaging for 71,052 Galaxies

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2408.10160 v1 pith:325CLOH6 submitted 2024-08-19 astro-ph.GA

Karen L. Masters (Haverford) , Melanie Galloway (Minnesota , ZEISS Industrial Metrology) , Lucy Fortson (Minnesota) , Chris Lintott (Oxford) , Mike Read (ROE) , Claudia Scarlata (Minnesota) , Brooke Simmons (Lancaster)
show 3 more authors
Mike Walmsley (Toronto) Kyle Willett (Minnesota Amazon)
This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.GA
keywords ukidssgalaxiesgalaxyimagingclassificationscomparisonsinfraredmorphologies
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

We present morphological classifications based on Galaxy Zoo analysis of 71,052 galaxies with imaging from the United Kingdom Infrared Telescope Infrared Deep Sky Survey (UKIDSS). Galaxies were selected out of the Galaxy Zoo 2 (GZ2) sample, so also have gri imaging from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey. An identical classification tree, and vote weighting/aggregation was applied to both UKIDSS and GZ2 classifications enabling direct comparisons. With this Research Note we provide a public release of the GZ:UKIDSS morphologies and discuss some initial comparisons with GZ2.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Morphological Classification of Galaxies

    astro-ph.GA 2025-02 accept novelty 1.0 of 10

    This is a review of galaxy morphology classification, providing an updated crosswalk of terminologies, not a new scientific result.

Pith tools