Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 1 cited by

Many-point tropical relaxation and the Monge--Amp\`ere equation

T0 review · 2 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-01 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Minimal tropical surfaces through N prescribed points converge, after N^{-1/2} scaling, to the unique continuous concave solution of the planar Monge-Ampère equation whose source is the limiting density of the points.

desk verdict A serious, likely-correct many-point tropical limit theorem; the main risk is imported [KS18] machinery, not internal error. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.25878 v1 pith:32P34QCY submitted 2026-07-28 math.AP math.AGmath.MG

Nikita Kalinin , Ernesto Lupercio , Higinio Serrano , Mikhail Shkolnikov This is my paper · ORCID
classification math.APmath.AGmath.MG MSC 14T9035J9652A4060K3582C27
keywords Monge-AmpèreequationtropicalgeometryAleksandrovsolutionsrelaxationNewtonpolygonsAbeliansandpileaffinecovarianceconvex
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper tries to show that a purely combinatorial object — the pointwise-minimal piecewise-linear 'tropical' function with integer slopes that vanishes on the boundary of a convex domain and is non-smooth at N marked points — becomes, when rescaled by N^{-1/2} and as N grows, the solution of a fully nonlinear PDE, the planar Monge-Ampère equation with the limiting empirical measure of the marked points as its right-hand side. No determinant, Laplacian, or other differential operator is built into the discrete rule: curvature emerges from the topology of the tropical graph and the lattice areas of its dual Newton polygons, and minimality forces the local building blocks to be primitive. The paper proves uniform convergence of the normalized potentials on every bounded convex domain, an explicit O(N^{-1/2}) bound on the discrepancy between the discrete curvature measure and the empirical source measure on compact subsets, and — on rational polygons — exact structural control: N bounded cells, a spanning marked dual tree, and the exact total-mass identity MA(F_N)(Ω°) = N − 1 + O(√N). If the claims hold, they supply a new bridge from incidence combinatorics to nonlinear PDE, give a deterministic explanation of earlier numerical √N complexity observations, and imply almost-sure limits for random point clouds and an emergent affine covariance of the continuum solution.

What carries the argument

The central object is the minimal tropical relaxation G_P 0_Ω: the pointwise smallest nonnegative concave piecewise-linear function with integer slopes, zero boundary values, and corner locus containing the prescribed set P. Its corner locus Γ_P is an embedded planar graph whose edges carry integral weights; the graph's topology (bounded cells, marked dual spanning tree) and the lattice geometry of the dual Newton polygons (via Euler characteristic and Pick's formula) produce an exact local identity linking the Aleksandrov Monge–Ampère mass to the number of marked points, the boundary crossings of the graph, its components, and a nonnegative 'excess' term. Three engines make this quantitativ

What would settle it

Run an exact computation (the paper's own numerical routine does this) on a rational polygon for a strongly generic N-point configuration and test the three structural predictions: exactly N bounded cells, every compact internal edge of weight one, and total mass MA(F_N)(Ω°) = N − 1 + ½D_term with D_term ≤ C√N. One strongly generic configuration violating any of these — a weight-two compact internal edge or a bounded-cell count different from N — would falsify the finite-topology and curvature theorems. On the continuum side, take configurations whose empirical measures converge to an atomic m

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the central discovery is that the Monge–Ampère operator is an emergent, rather than prescribed, feature of tropical relaxation. For a bounded convex domain Ω, a compact K ⋐ Ω, and an N-point configuration P_N ⊂ K, let G_{P_N} 0_Ω be the pointwise-minimal nonnegative concave function expressible as a minimum of affine functions with integer slopes, zero on ∂Ω, whose corner locus contains every marked point. The paper proves that if the empirical measures μ_N converge weakly to a probability measure μ supported in K, then u_N = N^{-1/2} G_{P_N} 0_Ω converges uniformly on Ω̄ to F_{μ,Ω}, the unique continuous concave Aleksandrov solution of MA(F) = μ with zero boundary

Load-bearing premise

The argument rests on the assumption that the finite piecewise-linear toolbox imported from the authors' earlier work — where the possible slopes of the minimal tropical surface are controlled by the boundary slopes of a rational polygon, and the minimal surface is no more expensive than any admissible competitor — continues to work with uniform bounds when a general convex domain is approximated by rational polygons; if those bounds degrade as the approximating polygons gain

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the theorem is correct, the zero-boundary planar Monge–Ampère equation is the universal large-N limit of minimal tropical relaxations: any sequence of configurations whose empirical measures converge gives the corresponding Aleksandrov solution, on every bounded convex domain without any boundary regularity or strict-convexity assumption.
  • The deterministic O(√N) bounds on symplectic area, graph length, and boundary quasi-degree hold for every configuration (no genericity needed), explaining the √N height scale observed numerically and identifying N^{-1/2} as the correct macroscopic normalization of the potentials.
  • On rational polygons, the exact total-mass identity MA(F_N)(Ω°) = N − 1 + O(√N) means the unit total curvature of the continuum limit is approached with a precise, configuration-dependent boundary correction controlled by terminal branch weights.
  • For i.i.d. absolutely continuous random point clouds, almost-sure convergence of the empirical measures implies almost-sure convergence of the rescaled tropical potentials to the deterministic solution, and the continuum solution is fully affine-covariant even though the finite model has only GL(2,Z) covariance.
  • A configuration-dependent diagonal choice of lattice meshes makes the rescaled Abelian-sandpile odometer converge to the same Monge–Ampère solution, with the deficit measure converging to −ΔF_{μ,Ω}.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A natural testable extension: in dimension d, the interpolation dimension count would suggest N^{-1/d} scaling and an N^{-1/d}-type curvature rate; the planar argument's reliance on Euler–Pick topology and dual spanning trees (first Betti number exactly N) looks special to two dimensions, so a higher-dimensional analogue, if any, would likely need a different mechanism.
  • The paper explicitly leaves open the boundary-layer regime dist(P_N, ∂Ω) → 0; a plausible conjecture is that with suitable point spacing the same limit holds but the rate degrades, and the explicit disk/ellipse formulas (whose continuum measures reach the boundary) are natural benchmarks for probing this regime numerically.
  • The configuration-dependent sandpile diagonal suggests a stronger open question: if the fixed-source odometer approximation could be made quantitative in |P|, a uniform simultaneous (N, h → 0) limit with N h² → 0 might hold; the present results stop short of that, and the paper's refinement table gives a template for testing how the mesh threshold depends on the source set.
  • The paper's numerics show the N^{-1/2} rate nearly attained at moderate N; an interesting stress test suggested by the theory is whether configurations engineered with long boundary-parallel carriers or near-same-carrier degeneracies push the constant C(Ω,K,L) upward, since the theory's generic locus admits such configurations.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper studies the many-point tropical relaxation F_N = G_{P_N}0_Ω, the pointwise-minimal nonnegative concave tropical series with integer slopes, zero boundary values, and corner locus containing a prescribed N-point set P_N. The main result is that, for universally generic configurations whose empirical measures converge to a probability measure μ supported in a fixed compact set K⋐Ω, the normalized potentials N^{-1/2}F_N converge uniformly on Ω to the unique continuous concave Aleksandrov solution of MA(F)=μ with zero boundary values, and on compact interior sets the curvature discrepancy satisfies an O(N^{-1/2}) bounded-Lipschitz-type estimate. For rational polygons the paper proves stronger statements: an open dense full-measure strongly generic locus, exact marked primal–dual tree topology, exact total curvature identity MA(F_N)(Ω°)=N-1+½D_term(F_N) with D_term=O(√N), and weak convergence of curvature measures. The proof combines Hahn-field tropical interpolation, a symplectic-area comparison principle, semilinear stratification of marked configurations, Euler–Pick curvature identities, minimality deformations, tangential coarea, and weighted Crofton estimates. The paper also contains almost-sure random-point limits, affine covariance of the continuum solution, and a configuration-dependent Abelian-sandpile diagonal.

Significance. If the central claims are correct, this is a significant contribution: it provides a deterministic, incidence-driven approximation of a fully nonlinear PDE with quantitative rates and no fitted parameters. The proof architecture is coherent, and the paper is careful to distinguish internally proved statements from imported results, especially in Appendix A. It also states its limitations honestly in Section 9.6: the general convex-domain theorem gives only vague convergence, the universal genericity locus is residual but not open, and no simultaneous (N,h) sandpile limit is claimed. The numerical appendix is clearly labeled as diagnostic. The main weakness is a concrete error in the choice of the gradient grid in the interpolation step, which as written invalidates a load-bearing inequality; the error is local and easily repairable, so the overall strategy remains defensible.

major comments (2)
  1. [§3.2, Corollary 3.4] The claim that d_N = floor((√(N+1)-1)/2) satisfies |A_{d_N}| > N is false. For N=15, d_N=1 and |A_1|=9<15; for every N just below an even square the same failure occurs. Since Theorem 3.3 requires M>N, the tropical interpolation step does not apply as written for infinitely many N. This is load-bearing: Corollary 3.4 is the source of the O(√N) slope bound that feeds Theorem 3.8 and all later complexity estimates. The fix is local: replace the floor by a ceiling, e.g. d_N = ceil((√(N+1)-1)/2) or d_N = ceil(√N/2), which gives |A_{d_N}|>N and ∥m∥≤C√N. Please correct the definition and re-verify the constants in the surrounding statements.
  2. [§4.1, Lemma 4.1 and Appendix A] The uniform finite slope set A_N, and with it the semilinear genericity theorem, the marked dual tree, and the O(√N) curvature estimates, rests on the imported [KS18, Remark 9.7] convex-hull description of small-canonical gradients. The paper does not prove this statement. This is not by itself a defect, since the reference is cited precisely, but the dependence is load-bearing: if the convex-hull bound is not valid uniformly for the rational exhaustion polygons used in Section 9, the finite slope set collapses. I ask that the imported theorem be stated in the exact form needed for the exhaustion, with an explicit confirmation that the hypotheses of [KS18, Remark 9.7] are satisfied for every polygon Δ_j and uniformly over P∈Conf_N(O), or alternatively that a proof be sketched in the appendix.
minor comments (5)
  1. [§7.3, Theorem 7.3] The display comparing the unnormalized estimate for MA(F_P)-ν_P and the normalized estimate for MA(u_P)-μ_P should differ by a factor of N. Please ensure the final text makes the scaling unambiguous: the former should carry C√N and the latter C/√N, consistently with Theorem 1.1 and the abstract.
  2. [§2.5 and §9] The manuscript alternates between Ω as a compact polygonal body and Ω as an open convex domain. The convention in §2.5 is stated, but a standing notation line at the first use in each section would reduce the risk of confusion.
  3. [§9.2, Theorem 9.8] The proof of the rational-core theorem is long and central; a short flowchart or numbered list at the beginning of the proof, mirroring the three-step structure, would improve readability.
  4. [§6.3, Lemma 6.16] In the inequality D_term(F)≤C_Ω D_∂(F), the factor 2 from summing over polygon vertices is stated but not shown in the displayed chain. Adding one line showing that each side quasi-degree appears at both endpoints would make the argument easier to verify.
  5. [Appendix C] The numerical diagnostics are useful but are properly described as support, not proof. The paper already says this; consider adding one sentence in the main text pointing to the reproducibility archive so the distinction is visible to the reader.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circular derivation: the central Monge–Ampère limit is not equivalent to its inputs, and the principal [KS18] imports are parameter-free structural lemmas rather than restatements of the target theorem.

full rationale

The paper's main claim is not obtained by fitting a parameter to the limiting data and then reporting that fit as a prediction. The tropical relaxation F_N = G_{P_N}0_Ω is defined purely by incidence, integral slopes, zero boundary values, and pointwise minimality; the Monge–Ampère measure is not put into the discrete model. The convergence proof is a genuine derivation: square-root interpolation (Theorem 3.3), the Dirichlet competitor (Proposition 3.5), the symplectic-area comparison (Theorem 3.6), the finite semilinear slope model (Lemma 4.1), strong genericity and marked-tree topology (Theorems 4.19, 4.31), the Euler–Pick local curvature identity (Theorem 5.4), minimality forcing primitive interior edges and empty interior Newton polygons (Theorems 6.4, 6.13), and finally Aleksandrov compactness/stability plus uniqueness of the zero-boundary Dirichlet problem (Section 8). The only load-bearing inputs with overlapping authorship are imported from [KS18]: the finite small-canonical form and the boundary-gradient convex-hull bound invoked in Lemma 4.1 ('By the convex-hull description of the small-canonical gradients in [KS18, Remark 9.7], every gradient of F_P belongs to the convex hull of the boundary gradients'), and the symplectic-area boundary identity/minimality stated as Theorem 3.6 from [KS18, Lemma 14.6 and Corollary 14.7]. These are fixed, parameter-free statements about rational polygons; the target result—uniform convergence to the Aleksandrov solution for empirical measures—is not assumed in them. The paper transparently reconciles them in Appendix A and partially re-derives the minimality comparison directly from pointwise relaxation order (§3.4). The numerical appendix also checks the theory against an explicit continuum profile with no fitted constants, and Section 9.6 explicitly limits the non-polygonal claims (vague rather than weak curvature convergence, no exact total-mass formula), which is the opposite of inflating the result by construction. The imported [KS18] facts are a genuine correctness dependency, but dependency is not circularity. I find no specific circular step.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central theorem introduces no fitted constants; all O(√N) constants are structural and depend only on Ω, K, and the test compact set. The main external inputs are standard Monge–Ampère theory and [KS18]'s tropical-series machinery, which is prior work by the same authors but is published, parameter-free, and partly re-derived in the text. No ad hoc entities or fitted parameters are introduced.

assumptions (6)
  • standard math Standard zero-boundary Aleksandrov Dirichlet theory for bounded convex domains: existence, uniqueness, comparison, stability, maximum principle.
    Used in Sections 8.2 and 9.5.2 to identify limits and ensure uniqueness; linear boundary data removes strict-convexity assumptions, per [Ale58, RT77, Moo18].
  • domain assumption Tropical relaxation machinery from [KS18]: existence and minimality of G_P 0_Ω, finite small canonical form, boundary-gradient convex-hull bound, symplectic-area boundary identity.
    Imported, not fully re-proved; the paper reconciles the statements in Appendix A.2–A.3 and re-derives some minimality conclusions directly in Theorem 3.6.
  • standard math Hahn-field valuation cancellation and tropical linear dependence yielding interpolation through N points with gradients of size O(√N).
    Proved internally via Lemmas 3.1–3.2 using standard Hahn-field valuation cancellation; no new foundational assumption.
  • standard math Semilinear sets are closed under Boolean operations and projections, with the stated dimension inequalities.
    Proposition 4.3 is used throughout Section 4 for dimension counts; it relies on quantifier elimination / Fourier–Motzkin and linear algebra.
  • standard math Pick's theorem and planar Euler characteristic/duality for polyhedral complexes.
    Used in Sections 5 and 7 to convert Newton-polygon area and graph topology into local curvature identities.
  • standard math One-dimensional coarea, layer cake, Sard's theorem, and Varadarajan almost-sure empirical-measure convergence.
    Used in Section 7.2 for tangential-variation estimates and in Section 10.1 for random point clouds.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Many-point tropical relaxation and the Monge--Amp\`ere equation." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/32P34QCY

@misc{pith2026260725878,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Many-point tropical relaxation and the Monge--Amp\`ere equation},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/32P34QCY}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.25878}
}
abstract

We construct an incidence-driven tropical approximation of the planar Aleksandrov Monge--Amp\`ere equation. Let $\Omega\subset\mathbb R^2$ be a bounded open convex domain, let $K\Subset\Omega$, and let $F_N=G_{P_N}0_\Omega$ be the minimal nonnegative concave tropical series with integral slopes, zero boundary values, and corner locus containing an $N$-point set $P_N\subset K$. For universally generic configurations whose empirical measures converge to $\mu$, $N^{-1/2}F_N\longrightarrow F_{\mu,\Omega}$ uniformly on $\overline\Omega$, where $F_{\mu,\Omega}$ is the unique continuous concave Aleksandrov solution of $\mathrm{MA}(F)=\mu$ with zero boundary values. On every compact $L\Subset\Omega$ we prove an $O(N^{-1/2})$ bounded-Lipschitz-type estimate for the curvature discrepancy. No regularity or strict-convexity assumption is imposed on $\partial\Omega$. For rational polygons, strong genericity holds on an open dense full-measure locus. The tropical curve has exactly $N$ bounded cells, the marked dual edges form a spanning tree, and every compact internal edge has weight one. These finite statements yield global weak curvature convergence and the exact identity $\mathrm{MA}(F_N)(\Omega^\circ)=N-1+\frac{1}{2}D_{\mathrm{term}}(F_N)$, with $D_{\mathrm{term}}(F_N)=O(\sqrt N)$. The proof combines tropical interpolation, semilinear marked topology, an Euler--Pick curvature formula, minimal coefficient deformations, tangential coarea, and a weighted Crofton estimate uniform over rational polygonal exhaustions. We also obtain almost-sure limits for random point clouds, full affine covariance of the continuum solution, and a configuration-dependent Abelian-sandpile diagonal.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.25878 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Structural architecture of the proof (schematic, N = 3). (a) Blue regions are bounded linearity cells; gray regions meet ∂Ω and are not counted in the bounded-face genus. Marked carriers are red and terminal branches purple. (b) Cutting every marked carrier at its marked point and adjoining formal ends produces the completed marked tree TP . (c) The duals of the marked carriers form a spanning tree; reidentifying th… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Exact topology and the boundary-carrier stress test. Top left: the polyhedral complex for one N = 160 configuration, with g = 160. Top right: N = 20 distinct marked carriers in a collar of thickness 10−3 , vertically magnified. Bottom: the nongeneric same-carrier collapse g = 1 and its generic normal unfolding to g = 8. C.2. Continuum and discrete approximation. For a compactly supported radial source in the unit di… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Compact-support disk benchmark. Left: angular means of the normalized tropical fields and the exact Aleksandrov profile. Center: relative field error, including the matched R = 80 resolution check. Right: normalized center height and the exact continuum value. The N −1/2 line is a reference scale, not a fitted exponent. Finally, fix eight generic rational source sets with N = 12. Starting from the maximal stable bac… view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Symmetry Emergence in Self-Organized Criticality

    math-ph 2026-08 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Many random perturbations of a maximal-density sandpile yield a toppling-function scaling limit governed by the Monge-Ampère equation, with SL2(R) covariance and explicit density-deviation estimates.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

26 extracted references · 3 linked inside Pith · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    Aleksandrov, A. D. , title =. Vestnik Leningrad. Univ. Ser. Mat. Mekh. Astronom. , volume =. 1958 , note =

    1958

  2. [2]

    Rauch, Jeffrey and Taylor, B. A. , title =. Rocky Mountain Journal of Mathematics , volume =. 1977 , doi =

    1977

  3. [3]

    , title =

    Guti\'errez, Cristian E. , title =. 2016 , doi =

    2016

  4. [4]

    2017 , doi =

    Figalli, Alessio , title =. 2017 , doi =

    2017

  5. [5]

    Rendiconti del Seminario Matematico dell'Universit\`a e del Politecnico di Torino , volume =

    Mooney, Connor , title =. Rendiconti del Seminario Matematico dell'Universit\`a e del Politecnico di Torino , volume =. 2018 , eprint =

    2018

  6. [6]

    Sitzungsberichte der Kaiserlichen Akademie der Wissenschaften, Wien, Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftliche Klasse, Abteilung IIa , volume =

    Hahn, Hans , title =. Sitzungsberichte der Kaiserlichen Akademie der Wissenschaften, Wien, Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftliche Klasse, Abteilung IIa , volume =

  7. [7]

    Combinatorial and Computational Geometry , editor =

    Develin, Mike and Santos, Francisco and Sturmfels, Bernd , title =. Combinatorial and Computational Geometry , editor =. 2005 , eprint =

    2005

  8. [8]

    Journal of the American Mathematical Society , volume =

    Mikhalkin, Grigory , title =. Journal of the American Mathematical Society , volume =. 2005 , doi =

    2005

Show all 26 references
  1. [9]

    Idempotent Mathematics and Mathematical Physics , editor =

    Richter-Gebert, J\"urgen and Sturmfels, Bernd and Theobald, Thorsten , title =. Idempotent Mathematics and Mathematical Physics , editor =

  2. [10]

    2015 , doi =

    Maclagan, Diane and Sturmfels, Bernd , title =. 2015 , doi =

    2015

  3. [11]

    Duke Mathematical Journal , volume =

    Passare, Mikael and Rullg rd, Hans , title =. Duke Mathematical Journal , volume =. 2004 , doi =

    2004

  4. [12]

    Sitzungsber

    Pick, Georg , title =. Sitzungsber. Dtsch. Naturwiss.-Med. Ver. B\"ohmen ``Lotos'' Prag , volume =

  5. [13]

    and Rishel, Raymond , title =

    Fleming, Wendell H. and Rishel, Raymond , title =. Archiv der Mathematik , volume =. 1960 , doi =

    1960

  6. [14]

    1969 , doi =

    Federer, Herbert , title =. 1969 , doi =

    1969

  7. [15]

    Tyrrell , title =

    Rockafellar, R. Tyrrell , title =

  8. [16]

    2014 , doi =

    Schneider, Rolf , title =. 2014 , doi =

    2014

  9. [17]

    Varadarajan, V. S. , title =. Sankhy\=

  10. [18]

    Proceedings of the 28th G\"okova Geometry-Topology Conference , pages =

    Mikhalkin, Grigory and Shkolnikov, Mikhail , title =. Proceedings of the 28th G\"okova Geometry-Topology Conference , pages =. 2023 , eprint =

    2023

  11. [19]

    Physical Review Letters , volume =

    Bak, Per and Tang, Chao and Wiesenfeld, Kurt , title =. Physical Review Letters , volume =. 1987 , doi =

    1987

  12. [20]

    Physical Review Letters , volume =

    Dhar, Deepak , title =. Physical Review Letters , volume =. 1990 , doi =

    1990

  13. [21]

    Journal of Statistical Physics , volume =

    Fey, Anne and Levine, Lionel and Peres, Yuval , title =. Journal of Statistical Physics , volume =. 2010 , doi =

    2010

  14. [22]

    EPL (Europhysics Letters) , volume =

    Caracciolo, Sergio and Paoletti, Guglielmo and Sportiello, Andrea , title =. EPL (Europhysics Letters) , volume =. 2010 , doi =. 1002.3974 , archivePrefix =

    2010 arXiv

  15. [23]

    Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems , volume =

    Kalinin, Nikita and Shkolnikov, Mikhail , title =. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems , volume =. 2018 , doi =. 1706.03062 , archivePrefix =

    2018

  16. [24]

    Communications in Mathematics , volume =

    Kalinin, Nikita and Prieto, Yulieth , title =. Communications in Mathematics , volume =. 2023 , doi =. 1906.02802 , archivePrefix =

    2023 arXiv

  17. [25]

    Advances in Mathematics , volume =

    Kalinin, Nikita and Shkolnikov, Mikhail , title =. Advances in Mathematics , volume =. 2026 , doi =. 1502.06284 , archivePrefix =

    2026 arXiv

  18. [26]

    Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America , volume =

    Kalinin, Nikita and Guzm\'an-S\'aenz, Aldo and Prieto, Yulieth and Shkolnikov, Mikhail and Kalinina, Vera and Lupercio, Ernesto , title =. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America , volume =. 2018 , doi =

    2018

Pith tools

Reviewed August 1, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.