Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 57 references

Automatic Phase Calibration for High-resolution mmWave Sensing via Ambient Radio Anchors

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read AutoCalib identifies small metallic objects—screws, rivets, fire alarms—in everyday scenes and uses them as stable phase references for mmWave radar calibration, approaching corner-reflector accuracy without any artificial reflector.

desk verdict Interesting ARA concept, but the paper's own figure captions say the load-bearing validation experiments cannot support the central claim, so it is not ready for peer review. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.23472 v1 pith:36KLPJ6Z submitted 2025-06-30 eess.SP

Ruixu Geng , Yadong Li , Dongheng Zhang , Pengcheng Huang , Binquan Wang , Binbin Zhang , Zhi Lu , Yang Hu
show 1 more author
Yan Chen
This is my paper
classification eess.SP
keywords mmWaveradarphasecalibrationAmbientRadioAnchorsspatialspectrumtemplatecornerreflectorresonancescatteringMIMO-SARimagingerror
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Many mmWave radar arrays drift in phase by small amounts each day, and for arrays with dozens of antennas that drift destroys angular resolution within months, so periodic recalibration is needed. Existing recalibration options are either manual (placing a corner reflector) or imprecise (picking strong reflectors that have no stable phase center). The paper claims that small everyday metal objects—screws, rivets, electronic components—can serve as Ambient Radio Anchors (ARAs) because their size near the 4 mm wavelength puts their scattering in the resonance region, making their phase response mimic an ideal point target. AutoCalib detects such anchors by generating theoretical spatial-spectrum templates of point scatterers and matching measured radar spectra against them, then ranks candidates by pattern quality and geometry. In experiments across 11 environments it reports a 74% phase-error reduction versus uncalibrated arrays, an 83% improvement over existing ambient-scatterer methods, and 96% of corner-reflector imaging quality in handheld imaging, implying that professional-grade phase calibration could become fully automatic in everyday settings.

What carries the argument

The central object is the spatial-spectrum template of an ideal isolated point scatterer, built from the paper's Virtual Isolated Point (VIP) and Pattern Invariance (PI) properties. For each candidate position, AutoCalib simulates the ideal radar response, applies a range FFT followed by an angular FFT, extracts the normalized angular spectrum at the target range, and stores it as a template. Detection compares a measured range-angle spectrum against templates at the same range using the normalized inner product $M_i = \langle S_{\mathrm{norm}}, T_i \rangle$, with $\tau = 0.7$ as the classification threshold. Candidates are then scored as $S_i = M_i + 0.6\,S_g(p_i)$, where the geometric score $S_g = 1 - \frac{x_i^2 + y_i^2}{x_i^2 + y_i^2 + z_i^2 + \epsilon}$ penalizes off-boresight angles and targets too close to the radar.

What would settle it

Repeat the controlled measurement behind Figs. 5 and 6 with a freshly calibrated radar: place one small screw at 5 m, vary the viewing angle from 0° to 20°, and record the per-antenna phase. If the measured phase pattern deviates from the ideal point-target template beyond the 0.7 similarity threshold at any angle, or if the phase center shifts with time or temperature, the ARA detector has no physical basis.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that phase stability for radar calibration does not require a specially engineered reflector; it can be found in nature. The paper defines an ARA as any ambient object whose radar cross-section is approximately constant across all receiving antennas, $\partial\sigma(p_\omega; p_n)/\partial p_n = 0$, and argues that this condition is met by two mechanisms: corner reflectors achieve it by geometry, while small metal objects achieve it by resonance when their dimensions approach the wavelength. AutoCalib makes this definition operational through template matching: it simulates the radar response of an ideal point scatterer at every candidate position, normalizes the resulting spatial spectrum, and scores measured spectra by inner-product similarity to the nearest template. Candidates passing a threshold of 0.7 are ranked by a combined score that also favors positions directly in front of the radar and beyond the near field. Reported results include detection of natural ARAs in 11 environments, a calibration MAE of 0.17 rad versus 0.56–0.57 rad for the baselines, and handheld imaging that reaches 99% of ground-truth PSNR.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that small metallic objects in ordinary environments behave like ideal point scatterers, with a radar cross-section that is essentially the same for every array element and stable over time and viewing angle; the paper's own figure captions in Section II-C3 note that the experiments meant to verify this need to be redone and that the existing data cannot support them.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • A large-array mmWave radar could recalibrate itself during idle moments using whatever small metal objects happen to be in the room, removing the need for anechoic-chamber sessions or manually placed reflectors.
  • The same calibration quality carries over to phase-sensitive applications: handheld SAR imaging reaches about 99% of corner-reflector PSNR, and respiratory sensing during radar motion matches dedicated motion-compensation methods.
  • The method's valid range covers arrays of up to roughly 200 antennas, which spans current commercial large-array radars and near-future designs; beyond that, sub-array or hierarchical calibration would be needed.
  • Because the VIP and PI principles are frequency-independent, the same anchor-detection recipe could in principle calibrate radars at other bands from WiFi to THz, a transfer the paper motivates but does not demonstrate.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • An editorial caution: the paper's own figure captions for Figs. 5 and 6 in Section II-C3 state that those validation experiments 'need to be redone' and that 'existing data cannot support them,' so the empirical foundation for the ARA physical premise is not yet closed.
  • If ARAs are as plentiful as reported, the same template-matching detector could be inverted into a landmark finder, locating screws, rivets, and structural corners for radar self-localization or mapping rather than just calibration.
  • The measured phase-drift rate (0.0005 rad/day) and the similarity-score threshold imply a self-triggering recalibration loop: a radar could monitor its own detection scores and recalibrate only when the score falls, rather than on a fixed schedule.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper proposes AutoCalib, a framework for automatic mmWave radar phase calibration using naturally occurring 'Ambient Radio Anchors' (ARAs) — small metallic objects such as screws and rivets that, the authors argue, behave as ideal point scatterers with stable phase centers. The method generates theoretical spatial-spectrum templates for ideal point targets, matches measured spectra against these templates to detect ARAs, and ranks candidates by pattern similarity and geometric position. The authors report that AutoCalib reduces phase error by 74% relative to uncalibrated arrays and outperforms existing ambient-scatterer methods by 83%, approaching corner-reflector calibration quality, and that it also supports handheld imaging and respiratory sensing. The paper's central physical premise is that objects whose dimensions approach the 4 mm wavelength at 77 GHz satisfy the condition ∂σ(pω; pn)/∂pn = 0 (Eq. (3)), making their radar response independent of antenna position.

Significance. If the central claims were established, the contribution would be significant: it would replace manual corner-reflector calibration with an automatic, reflector-free procedure and open the door to periodic in-situ recalibration of large-array mmWave radars. The paper also contributes a concrete quantification of phase drift over time for a cascaded 86-antenna radar, which is valuable motivation. However, the significance is currently conditional: the load-bearing experimental evidence is explicitly disclaimed in the manuscript's own figure captions, and the theoretical lemmas that justify the ARA concept are relegated to a supplementary document that is not included in the submission. No code, data, or machine-checked proofs are provided. The paper does not yet meet the evidentiary standard for a journal publication.

major comments (4)
  1. [Fig. 5, Sec. II-C2] The manuscript's own caption for Fig. 5 states '待做!!! 需要重新做实验 (实验2) 现有数据无法支撑!' — i.e., the experiment must be redone and the existing data cannot support the claim. This figure is the only direct validation that a small metallic screw at 5 m satisfies the ARA condition of Eq. (3). With this validation unavailable, the central physical premise of the paper is unsupported. The same disclaimer applies to Fig. 6 (VIP/PI validation) and Fig. 8 (spatial-spectrum discriminability), which are the evidence that ARAs behave like ideal point targets across environments.
  2. [Sec. II-C4, Lemma II.1, Lemma II.2; Sec. III-B2, Eq. (9)] The proofs of Lemma II.1 (Virtual Isolated Point) and Lemma II.2 (Pattern Invariance) are deferred to Supplementary Note IV, and the derivation of the template response y_ideal_n(p_i) in Eq. (9) is deferred to Supplementary Note V. Neither note is present in the arXiv submission. The template library is therefore not actually derived within the manuscript. Since VIP states that ARAs are electromagnetically equivalent to ideal isolated point targets, which is very close to the defining condition Eq. (3), the reader cannot verify whether the lemmas add anything beyond the definition unless the proofs are provided.
  3. [Sec. II-C2, Eq. (3)] The physical argument that 'dimensions approach the wavelength' leads to RCS independence across antenna positions is asserted, not derived. For a non-spherical, asymmetric object such as a screw, scattering in the resonance region is generally shape-, polarization-, and orientation-dependent; size alone does not establish Eq. (3). The paper offers no simulation, analytical model, or valid measurement to support this transition from electromagnetic theory to the ARA condition. This is a load-bearing step, not a presentation detail.
  4. [Figs. 1 and 2, Sec. I] The motivation for periodic calibration is itself presented with in-progress data: the captions of Figs. 1 and 2 contain annotations '正在做' (in progress) and '需要根据实验1最终更新' (needs to be finally updated according to Experiment 1). Thus the claim that phase drift degrades 86-antenna radar angular resolution by 26.36% over 100 days is not yet supported by finalized experiments. This weakens the problem statement, although the qualitative drift phenomenon is plausible.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Throughout] Several figure captions contain untranslated Chinese annotations (e.g., Figs. 1, 2, 5, 6, 8). The captions should be fully in English and should not carry editorial to-do notes such as '待做' or '现有数据无法支撑'.
  2. [Sec. II-C2, Eq. (8)] The notation δϕ_ideal(p_a) in Eq. (8) is not defined in the text. Please define it explicitly and state how it would be known for an arbitrary environmental reflector.
  3. [Fig. 13 and Table I] There is a typo: 'groud truth' should be 'ground truth'. Also, the figure numbering is inconsistent: the text refers to Fig. 14 for the minimum calibration interval, but the displayed figure is numbered 19 in the Chinese annotation; please renumber all figures and cross-references.
  4. [Sec. IV-B2, Sec. IV-C6] The reported 74% phase error reduction and 83% improvement over baselines depend on the threshold τ = 0.7 in Eq. (12) and the weight w_g = 0.6 in Eq. (14), both tuned on the authors' own datasets. Please provide a sensitivity analysis or justify that these values are not overfit to the particular scenes, or state the ranges over which the qualitative conclusions hold.
  5. [Sec. IV-C5, Fig. 17] The claim that AutoCalib is effective for arrays of up to 200 elements is based on a rail-simulated array. Please clarify how the 380 simulated antenna positions are turned into a 200-element array and whether the phase response is measured with the same radar front-end or by synthesizing aperture samples.

Circularity Check

2 steps flagged · score 4.0 of 10

The ARA concept is defined by Eq. (3), the VIP lemma restates that definition, and the template-matching detector is generated from the same ideal-point model, so any detected ARA possesses the calibrating property by construction; the experiments that would supply independent physical content (Figs. 5, 6, 8) are disclaimed in their own captions as '待做' and '现有数据无法支撑'.

  1. self definitional [Sec. II-C1 (Eq. 3); Sec. II-C4 (Lemma II.1); Sec. III-B2 (Eq. 9); Sec. III-C (Eqs. 11-12); Sec. II-B (Eq. 7)]
    "We define ambient objects satisfying this condition as ARAs. ... Lemma II.1 (Virtual Isolated Point (VIP) ). ARAs have radar response electromagnetically equivalent to that of an ideal isolated point (Proof in Supplementary Note IV). ... Ti = F {yideal n (pi)} = Fa{Fr{yideal n (pi)}} / ∥Fa{Fr{yideal n (pi)}}∥"

    The ARA condition is Eq. (3), ∂σ(pω;pn)/∂pn = 0: RCS independent of the observing antenna, the defining property of an ideal point scatterer. Lemma II.1 ('ARAs have radar response electromagnetically equivalent to that of an ideal isolated point') restates this definition; its proof is deferred to the absent Supplementary Note IV. The template library is generated 'according to VIP' from the ideal-point response (Eq. (9), derivation in the equally absent Supplementary Note V), and an object is declared an ARA when its spatial spectrum matches that ideal-point template (Eq. (12), Mi ≥ 0.7). Calibration (Eq. (7)) then assumes the matched object's ideal-point phase profile.

  2. other [Fig. 5 caption (Sec. II-C3); Fig. 6 caption (Sec. II-C4); Fig. 8 caption (Sec. IV-A1)]
    "图5：强散射体、ARA是否满足定义的验证实验(2.3.3) 待做！！！ ... 需要重新做实验 (实验2) 现有数据无法支撑！ 图6：验证VIP和PI的性质，不同距离下都符合点目标的含义 待做！！！ ... 需要重新做实验 (实验3) 现有数据无法支撑！ 图8：验证空间谱的有效性 (4.1.1) 待做 ... 需要重新做实验 (实验4) 现有数据无法支撑！"

    These captions disclaim the experiments the body text reports as done: Sec. II-C3 states 'Fig. 5(a) demonstrates that when testing with a pre-calibrated radar, a metallic object (screw) at 5m produces nearly identical phase responses across all antennas,' and the 'Experimental Validation' paragraph invokes Fig. 6 for VIP and PI; the spatial-spectrum choice relies on Fig. 8. Each caption instead says the experiment is '待做' (to be done) and '现有数据无法支撑' (existing data cannot support the claim). These are the experiments that would independently confirm that near-wavelength metallic objects have stable phase centers and that the template representation discriminates ARAs from non-ARAs.

full rationale

The scoring reflects a partial circularity, not a forced one. The definitional chain is explicit: ARA is defined by Eq. (3); Lemma II.1 (VIP) and the template generation (Eq. (9)) are built from exactly that ideal-point model; the detection threshold (Eq. (12)) selects objects matching the template; and calibration (Eq. (7)) applies the ideal-point phase model to the selected object. So, by construction, anything AutoCalib detects satisfies the assumption its calibrator uses. What keeps the score at 4 rather than 6-8 is independent external grounding inside the paper: (i) the estimated phase-error vector from a detected fire alarm matches corner-reflector ground truth (Tab. I: AC MAE 0.17 vs GT 0.00; 74% reduction vs uncalibrated), an external gold standard that a non-point scatterer would fail; (ii) imaging results (Tab. II: PSNR 18.04 vs 18.24 for corner reflector) benchmark against the same external standard; (iii) detection and localization are checked against LiDAR ground truth (Fig. 12, median error 0.1 m). These would falsify the ARA premise if it were false, so the headline calibration claims are not 'fit renamed as prediction.' The circularity that remains is the VIP lemma being definitional and the supporting physics experiments being disclaimed in the paper's own figure captions (Figs. 5, 6, 8 say '待做' and '现有数据无法支撑'), with lemma proofs and the template derivation deferred to Supplementary Notes IV and V, which are not in the arXiv version. Self-citations (e.g., refs. [12] and [41], sharing authors with this paper) are not load-bearing: the geometric-score claim citing [12] is argued physically in the text, and the handheld-imaging ground truth comes from a previously published system, so per the rules they do not raise the score. Also flagged as missing support rather than circularity: the motivating drift experiments (Figs. 1 and 2 captions: '正在做' and '需要根据实验1 最终更新') are pending. Net: the ARA detection-to-calibration loop is self-consistent by definition, but the central quantitative claims are anchored to an external corner-reflector benchmark, giving a score of 4.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 1 invented entities

The central design depends on several unproved or deferred assumptions. The paper's own notes indicate pending validation for the ARA concept, and the detection pipeline introduces fitted parameters that are not independently held out.

free parameters (2)
  • similarity threshold tau = 0.7
    Set from Fig. 11 in Sec. IV-A4; used in Eq. (12) to decide whether a spatial spectrum match counts as an ARA. Chosen on the evaluation scenes that later produce the headline accuracy numbers.
  • geometric weight w_g = 0.6
    Set from the microbenchmark in Sec. IV-D3/Fig. 21 to balance similarity score and geometric score in Eq. (14); tuned on the same application datasets used for the final comparison.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption The received signal model in Eq. (1) describes each antenna's measurement as an integral over independent scatterers with known propagation delay and no significant multipath after range-angle processing.
    Used to derive the ideal template y_ideal_n(p_i); invoked in Section II-A and deferred to Supplementary Note V for detailed derivation.
  • ad hoc to paper The ARA condition Eq. (3) is sufficient for an object to respond like an ideal isolated point target (Lemma II.1).
    This is the paper's defining characterization of ARAs; the proof is deferred to Supplementary Note IV, which is not included in the arXiv version.
  • ad hoc to paper Pattern Invariance (Lemma II.2): an ARA's spatial spectrum changes only by a global phase shift across environments, with no structural distortion.
    Required for templates generated from one model to match measurements in arbitrary scenes; the proof is deferred and the validation in Fig. 6 is marked as needing to be redone.
  • domain assumption Objects with dimension near the wavelength have RCS stable across viewing angles due to resonance-region scattering.
    Invoked in Section II-C2 based on cited electromagnetic texts; the empirical confirmation for screws and rivets is in Fig. 5, whose caption says the experiment needs to be redone.
invented entities (1)
  • Ambient Radio Anchor (ARA)
    purpose: A naturally occurring object whose RCS is invariant across array elements, used as a calibration reference without an artificial corner reflector.
    The existence and utility of ARAs is the paper's central empirical claim; validation figures are flagged as needing redo, and no independent repository or external measurement is provided.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Automatic Phase Calibration for High-resolution mmWave Sensing via Ambient Radio Anchors." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/36KLPJ6Z

@misc{pith2026250623472,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Automatic Phase Calibration for High-resolution mmWave Sensing via Ambient Radio Anchors},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/36KLPJ6Z}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.23472}
}
read the original abstract

Millimeter-wave (mmWave) radar systems with large array have pushed radar sensing into a new era, thanks to their high angular resolution. However, our long-term experiments indicate that array elements exhibit phase drift over time and require periodic phase calibration to maintain high-resolution, creating an obstacle for practical high-resolution mmWave sensing. Unfortunately, existing calibration methods are inadequate for periodic recalibration, either because they rely on artificial references or fail to provide sufficient precision. To address this challenge, we introduce AutoCalib, the first framework designed to automatically and accurately calibrate high-resolution mmWave radars by identifying Ambient Radio Anchors (ARAs)-naturally existing objects in ambient environments that offer stable phase references. AutoCalib achieves calibration by first generating spatial spectrum templates based on theoretical electromagnetic characteristics. It then employs a pattern-matching and scoring mechanism to accurately detect these anchors and select the optimal one for calibration. Extensive experiments across 11 environments demonstrate that AutoCalib capable of identifying ARAs that existing methods miss due to their focus on strong reflectors. AutoCalib's calibration performance approaches corner reflectors (74% phase error reduction) while outperforming existing methods by 83%. Beyond radar calibration, AutoCalib effectively supports other phase-dependent applications like handheld imaging, delivering 96% of corner reflector calibration performance without artificial references.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2506.23472 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Phase error between mmWave radar antennas changes over time. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p001_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. (a) Impact of phase drift on different radars. (b) TI 1843 Boost radar [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Defining Ambient Radio Anchors (ARAs). 1) The Mathematical Basis of Effective Calibrators: The effectiveness of corner reflectors stems from their consistent RCS across each receiving antenna. As illustrated in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (14 more)
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Phase response: ARA vs. Non-ARA. 3) Experimental Verification of Natural ARAs: We first verified that small RCS objects indeed qualify as ARAs, while traditional reference with strong reflections do not [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Experimental validation of VIP and PI. Each row validates VIP by [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: System overview. AutoCalib first generates theoretical templates, then matches these templates against measured radar data to recognize ARAs, and [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Spatial spectrum is a suitable template because it effectively discrim [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_8.png]
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Qualitative results of ARA discovery. AutoCalib successfully [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_10.png]
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: The impact of similarity threshold. 图10：不同场景的点目标发现实验 (5.1) AutoCalib PS[39] SS[53] Corner Reflector Natural ARA 100 10-1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_11.png]
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: Qualitative results of radar calibration. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_13.png]
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: Minimum calibration interval assessment. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_14.png]
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: ARA presence across environments [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_15.png]
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16: Evaluating AutoCalib under different distances, orientations and angles. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_16.png]
Figure 17
Figure 17. Figure 17: Impact of antenna array size. 4) Impact of Viewing Angle: We evaluated AutoCalib’s performance when reflectors are not directly facing the radar, as shown in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_17.png]
Figure 18
Figure 18. Figure 18: Handheld mmWave imaging performance. impressive considering handheld imaging’s sensitivity to phase calibration errors, as detailed in Supplementary Note VI. 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.4 0.6 0.8 Permanent scatterer ARA Stable scatterer (a) Experiment setup (b) References 1.8 m ≈…
Figure 19
Figure 19. Figure 19: , the similarity score decreases as phase error increases, with performance degrading significantly when the average per-antenna phase error (MAE) exceeds 0.35 rad. This thresh￾old suggests the maximum calibration interval for AutoCalib is approximately 700 days (calc…
Figure 21
Figure 21. Figure 21: Impact of geometric weight wg on application performance. E. Complexity Analysis ARA Template Generation is performed offline as prepro￾cessing, leaving runtime complexity dependent only on Pattern Recognition and Ranking. With parallel implementation across range bin…

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

57 extracted references · 56 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Zero-Shot Accurate mmWave An- tenna Array Calibration in the Wild,

    O. Delafrooz Noroozi, H. Guo, R. Shen, Z. Shao, H. Chen, K. Sengupta, Y . Ghasempour, and U. Madhow, “Zero-Shot Accurate mmWave An- tenna Array Calibration in the Wild,” in Proceedings of the 30th Annual International Conference on Mobile Computing and Networking , ser. ACM MobiCom ’24, Dec. 2024, pp. 1938–1945

    work page 2024

  2. [2]

    Cooperative Coherent Multistatic Imaging and Phase Synchronization in Networked Sensing,

    D. Tagliaferri, M. Manzoni, M. Mizmizi, S. Tebaldini, A. V . Monti- Guarnieri, C. M. Prati, and U. Spagnolini, “Cooperative Coherent Multistatic Imaging and Phase Synchronization in Networked Sensing,” IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications , pp. 1–1, 2024

    work page 2024

  3. [3]

    Radar Perception in Autonomous Driving: Explor- ing Different Data Representations,

    S. Yao, R. Guan, Z. Peng, C. Xu, Y . Shi, Y . Yue, E. G. Lim, H. Seo, K. L. Man, X. Zhu et al., “Radar Perception in Autonomous Driving: Explor- ing Different Data Representations,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2312.04861 , pp. 1–22, 2023

    arXiv 2023

  4. [4]

    Overview of signal processing techniques for automotive millimeter-wave radar,

    Y . Huang, H. Zhang, L. Lan, K. Deng, Y . Yang, R. Zhang, J. Liu, Y . Zhang, Y . Wang, R. Zhou, J. Xu, X. Xi, X. Zhang, K. Zheng, Y . Liu, and W. Hong, “Overview of signal processing techniques for automotive millimeter-wave radar,” Journal of Radars, vol. 12, no. 5, pp. 923–970, 2023

    work page 2023

  5. [5]

    Malicious Attacks against Multi-Sensor Fusion in Autonomous Driving,

    Y . Zhu, C. Miao, H. Xue, Y . Yu, L. Su, and C. Qiao, “Malicious Attacks against Multi-Sensor Fusion in Autonomous Driving,” in Proceedings of the Annual International Conference on Mobile Computing And Networking (MobiCom), May 2024, pp. 436–451

    work page 2024

  6. [6]

    A Survey of mmWave-Based Human Sensing: Technology, Platforms and Applications,

    J. Zhang, R. Xi, Y . He, Y . Sun, X. Guo, W. Wang, X. Na, Y . Liu, Z. Shi, and T. Gu, “A Survey of mmWave-Based Human Sensing: Technology, Platforms and Applications,” IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutori- als, vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 2052–2087, 2023

    work page 2023

  7. [7]

    Monitoring long- term cardiac activity with contactless radio frequency signals,

    B.-B. Zhang, D. Zhang, Y . Li, Z. Lu, J. Chen, H. Wang, F. Zhou, Y . Pu, Y . Hu, L.-K. Ma, Q. Sun, and Y . Chen, “Monitoring long- term cardiac activity with contactless radio frequency signals,” Nature Communications, vol. 15, no. 1, p. 10598, Dec. 2024. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MOBILE COMPUTING, VOL. XX, NO. X, JULY 2025 12

    work page 2024

  8. [8]

    A Review of Millimeter Wave Device- Based Localization and Device-Free Sensing Technologies and Appli- cations,

    A. Shastri, N. Valecha, E. Bashirov, H. Tataria, M. Lentmaier, F. Tufves- son, M. Rossi, and P. Casari, “A Review of Millimeter Wave Device- Based Localization and Device-Free Sensing Technologies and Appli- cations,” IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials , vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 1708–1749, 2022

    work page 2022

Show all 57 references
  1. [9]

    Contactless Arterial Blood Pressure Waveform Monitoring with mmWave Radar,

    Q. Hu, Q. Zhang, H. Lu, S. Wu, Y . Zhou, Q. Huang, H. Chen, Y .- C. Chen, and N. Zhao, “Contactless Arterial Blood Pressure Waveform Monitoring with mmWave Radar,” Proceedings of the ACM on Interac- tive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies (IMWUT) , vol. 8, no. 4, pp...

    2024

  2. [10]

    Precise 2D and 3D Fluoroscopic Imaging by Using an FMCW Millimeter-Wave Radar,

    Y . Wang, J. Su, T. Fukuda, M. Tonouchi, and H. Murakami, “Precise 2D and 3D Fluoroscopic Imaging by Using an FMCW Millimeter-Wave Radar,” IEEE Access, vol. 11, pp. 84 027–84 034, 2023

    2023

  3. [11]

    Sidelobes and Ghost Targets Mitigation Technique for High-Resolution Forward-Looking MIMO-SAR,

    A. Albaba, M. Bauduin, A. Sakhnini, H. Sahli, and A. Bourdoux, “Sidelobes and Ghost Targets Mitigation Technique for High-Resolution Forward-Looking MIMO-SAR,” IEEE Transactions on Radar Systems , vol. 2, pp. 237–250, 2024

    2024

  4. [12]

    A high-resolution handheld millimeter-wave imaging system with phase er- ror estimation and compensation,

    Y . Li, D. Zhang, R. Geng, Z. Lu, Z. Wu, Y . Hu, Q. Sun, and Y . Chen, “A high-resolution handheld millimeter-wave imaging system with phase er- ror estimation and compensation,” Communications Engineering, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 1–11, 2024

    2024

  5. [13]

    AWR1843 automotive radar sensor data sheet,

    T. Instruments, “AWR1843 automotive radar sensor data sheet,” Texas Instruments, Tech. Rep., 2018

    2018

  6. [14]

    RF- GymCare: Introducing Respiratory Prior for RF Sensing in Gym En- vironments,

    J. Wang, D. Zhang, B. Zhang, J. Chen, Y . Hu, and Y . Chen, “RF- GymCare: Introducing Respiratory Prior for RF Sensing in Gym En- vironments,” Proc. ACM Interact. Mob. Wearable Ubiquitous Technol. , vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 135:1–135:28, Sep. 2024

    2024

  7. [15]

    MM-MURE: mmWave-Based Multi-Subject Respiration Monitoring via End-to-End Deep Learning,

    C. Bauder, A.-K. Moadi, V . Rajagopal, T. Wu, J. Liu, and A. E. Fathy, “MM-MURE: mmWave-Based Multi-Subject Respiration Monitoring via End-to-End Deep Learning,” IEEE Journal of Electromagnetics, RF and Microwaves in Medicine and Biology , pp. 1–13, 2024

    2024

  8. [16]

    mmCLIP: Boosting mmWave-based Zero-shot HAR via Signal-Text Alignment,

    Q. Cao, H. Xue, T. Liu, X. Wang, H. Wang, X. Zhang, and L. Su, “mmCLIP: Boosting mmWave-based Zero-shot HAR via Signal-Text Alignment,” in Proceedings of the 22nd ACM Conference on Embedded Networked Sensor Systems , ser. SenSys ’24, Nov. 2024, pp. 184–197

    2024

  9. [17]

    Large Model for Small Data: Foundation Model for Cross-Modal RF Human Activity Recognition,

    Y . Weng, G. Wu, T. Zheng, Y . Yang, and J. Luo, “Large Model for Small Data: Foundation Model for Cross-Modal RF Human Activity Recognition,” in Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Embedded Networked Sensor Systems (SenSys) , Oct. 2024, pp. 1–14

    2024

  10. [18]

    A Novel Radar Point Cloud Gen- eration Method for Robot Environment Perception,

    Y . Cheng, J. Su, M. Jiang, and Y . Liu, “A Novel Radar Point Cloud Gen- eration Method for Robot Environment Perception,” IEEE Transactions on Robotics, vol. 38, no. 6, pp. 1–20, 2022

    2022

  11. [19]

    DREAM-PCD: Deep Reconstruction and Enhancement of mmWave Radar Pointcloud,

    R. Geng, Y . Li, D. Zhang, J. Wu, Y . Gao, Y . Hu, and Y . Chen, “DREAM-PCD: Deep Reconstruction and Enhancement of mmWave Radar Pointcloud,” IEEE Transactions on Image Processing , vol. 33, pp. 6774–6789, 2024

    2024

  12. [20]

    MilliPCD: Beyond Traditional Vision Indoor Point Cloud Generation via Handheld Millimeter-Wave Devices,

    PINGPING. CAI and SANJIB. SUR, “MilliPCD: Beyond Traditional Vision Indoor Point Cloud Generation via Handheld Millimeter-Wave Devices,” in Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies (IMWUT) , vol. 6, 2023, pp. 1–24

    2023

  13. [21]

    Antenna Array and Waveform Design for 4-D-Imaging mmWave MIMO Radar Sensors,

    N. Karimian-Sichani, M. Alaee-Kerahroodi, B. S. Mysore Rama Rao, E. Mehrshahi, and S. A. Ghorashi, “Antenna Array and Waveform Design for 4-D-Imaging mmWave MIMO Radar Sensors,” IEEE Trans- actions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems , vol. 60, no. 2, pp. 1848– 1864, Apr. 2024

    2024

  14. [22]

    A 223–276-GHz Cascadable FMCW Transceiver in 130-nm SiGe BiCMOS for Scalable MIMO Radar Ar- rays,

    E. Turkmen, I. K. Aksoyak, P. Djondovic, S. B. Yilmaz, W. Debski, W. Winkler, and A. C ¸ . Ulusoy, “A 223–276-GHz Cascadable FMCW Transceiver in 130-nm SiGe BiCMOS for Scalable MIMO Radar Ar- rays,” IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques, vol. 71, no. 12, pp. 539...

    2023

  15. [23]

    Enhancing mmWave Radar Sensing Using a Phased-MIMO Architec- ture,

    K. Zheng, W. Zhao, T. Woodford, R. Zhao, X. Zhang, and Y . Hua, “Enhancing mmWave Radar Sensing Using a Phased-MIMO Architec- ture,” in Proceedings of the International Conference on Mobile Systems, Applications, and Services (MobiSys), ser. MOBISYS ’24, 2024, pp. 56– 69

    2024

  16. [24]

    Automated Au- tomotive Radar Calibration with Intelligent Vehicles,

    A. Tsaregorodtsev, M. Buchholz, and V . Belagiannis, “Automated Au- tomotive Radar Calibration with Intelligent Vehicles,” in Proceedings of the European Signal Processing Conference (EUSIPCO), Sep. 2023, pp. 800–804

    2023

  17. [25]

    Over-the-Air Cali- bration of mmW Imaging Radars Using Uncorrelated Continuous Wave Signals,

    S. Heining, R. Feger, C. Wagner, and A. Stelzer, “Over-the-Air Cali- bration of mmW Imaging Radars Using Uncorrelated Continuous Wave Signals,” IEEE Journal of Microwaves , vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 970–979, Jul. 2023

    2023

  18. [26]

    3-D High- Resolution Imaging and Array Calibration of Ground-Based Millimeter- Wave MIMO Radar,

    G. Xu, Y . Chen, A. Ji, B. Zhang, C. Yu, and W. Hong, “3-D High- Resolution Imaging and Array Calibration of Ground-Based Millimeter- Wave MIMO Radar,” IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques, pp. 4919–4931, 2024

    2024

  19. [27]

    Challenges in Automotive MIMO Radar Calibration in Anechoic Chamber,

    D. Raphaeli and I. Bilik, “Challenges in Automotive MIMO Radar Calibration in Anechoic Chamber,” IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems , vol. 59, no. 5, pp. 6205–6214, Oct. 2023

    2023

  20. [28]

    UWB near-field MIMO radar: Calibration, measurements and image reconstruction,

    T. Spreng, U. Prechtel, B. Sch ¨onlinner, V . Ziegler, A. Meusling, and U. Siart, “UWB near-field MIMO radar: Calibration, measurements and image reconstruction,” in 2013 European Radar Conference, Oct. 2013, pp. 33–36

    2013

  21. [29]

    Near-Field Calibra- tion of Millimeter-Wave Massive MIMO Antenna Array Using Sphere Reflectors,

    J. Liu, K. Wu, T. Su, G. Pang, and S.-L. Chen, “Near-Field Calibra- tion of Millimeter-Wave Massive MIMO Antenna Array Using Sphere Reflectors,” IEEE Antennas and Wireless Propagation Letters , pp. 1–5, 2024

    2024

  22. [30]

    Millimeter-Wave 3-D Imaging Testbed With MIMO Array,

    Q. Guo, Z. Wang, T. Chang, and H.-L. Cui, “Millimeter-Wave 3-D Imaging Testbed With MIMO Array,” IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques, vol. 68, no. 3, pp. 1164–1174, Mar. 2020

    2020

  23. [31]

    Mobi 2 Sense: Empowering wireless sensing with mobility,

    F. Zhang, J. Xiong, Z. Chang, J. Ma, and D. Zhang, “Mobi 2 Sense: Empowering wireless sensing with mobility,” in Proceedings of the Annual International Conference on Mobile Computing And Networking (MobiCom), 2022, pp. 268–281

    2022

  24. [32]

    RF-Search: Searching Unconscious Victim in Smoke Scenes with RF- enabled Drone,

    B.-B. Zhang, D. Zhang, R. Song, B. Wang, Y . Hu, and Y . Chen, “RF-Search: Searching Unconscious Victim in Smoke Scenes with RF- enabled Drone,” in Proceedings of the Annual International Conference on Mobile Computing And Networking (MobiCom) , 2023, pp. 1–15

    2023

  25. [33]

    Enabling Visual Recognition at Radio Frequency,

    H. Lai, G. Luo, Y . Liu, and M. Zhao, “Enabling Visual Recognition at Radio Frequency,” in Proceedings of the Annual International Con- ference on Mobile Computing And Networking (MobiCom) , 2024, pp. 388–403

    2024

  26. [34]

    Pragmatic Approach to Phase Self-Calibration for Planar Array Millimeter-Wave MIMO Imaging,

    X. Tian, Q. Guo, Z. Wang, T. Chang, and H.-L. Cui, “Pragmatic Approach to Phase Self-Calibration for Planar Array Millimeter-Wave MIMO Imaging,” IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measure- ment, vol. 70, pp. 1–11, 2021

    2021

  27. [35]

    Adaptive phase-array calibration using MIMO radar clutter,

    J. Yu and J. Krolik, “Adaptive phase-array calibration using MIMO radar clutter,” in Proceedings of the IEEE Radar Conference (RadarConf) , Apr. 2013, pp. 1–5

    2013

  28. [36]

    Phased array antenna calibra- tion and pattern prediction using mutual coupling measurements,

    H. Aumann, A. Fenn, and F. Willwerth, “Phased array antenna calibra- tion and pattern prediction using mutual coupling measurements,” IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, vol. 37, no. 7, pp. 844–850, Jul. 1989

    1989

  29. [37]

    TI mmWave Radar sensor RF PCB Design, Manufac- turing and Validation Guide,

    T. Instruments, “TI mmWave Radar sensor RF PCB Design, Manufac- turing and Validation Guide,” 2018

    2018

  30. [38]

    User’s Guide: AWR1843BOOST and IWR1843BOOST Single- Chip mmWave Sensing Solution User’s Guide (Rev. B),

    ——, “User’s Guide: AWR1843BOOST and IWR1843BOOST Single- Chip mmWave Sensing Solution User’s Guide (Rev. B),” 2020

    2020

  31. [39]

    Light scattering in planetary atmo- spheres,

    J. E. Hansen and L. D. Travis, “Light scattering in planetary atmo- spheres,” Space Science Reviews, vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 527–610, Oct. 1974

    1974

  32. [40]

    C. A. Balanis, Advanced Engineering Electromagnetics , 2012

    2012

  33. [41]

    IFNet: Deep Imaging and Focusing for Handheld SAR with Millimeter-wave Signals,

    Y . Li, D. Zhang, R. Geng, J. Wu, Y . Hu, Q. Sun, and Y . Chen, “IFNet: Deep Imaging and Focusing for Handheld SAR with Millimeter-wave Signals,” IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing , pp. 1–16, 2024

    2024

  34. [42]

    Mobi2Sense: Enabling wireless sensing under device motions,

    J. Ma, Z. Chang, F. Zhang, J. Xiong, B. Jin, and D. Zhang, “Mobi2Sense: Enabling wireless sensing under device motions,” in Proceedings of the Annual International Conference on Mobile Computing And Networking (MobiCom), 2022, pp. 766–768

    2022

  35. [43]

    Application Note: Cascade Coherency and Phase Shifter Calibration,

    T. Instruments, “Application Note: Cascade Coherency and Phase Shifter Calibration,” 2022

    2022

  36. [44]

    User’s Guide: AWRx Cascaded Radar RF Evaluation Module (MMWCAS-RF-EVM),

    ——, “User’s Guide: AWRx Cascaded Radar RF Evaluation Module (MMWCAS-RF-EVM),” 2020

    2020

  37. [45]

    Optimum corner reflectors for calibration of imaging radars,

    K. Sarabandi and T.-C. Chiu, “Optimum corner reflectors for calibration of imaging radars,” IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation , vol. 44, no. 10, pp. 1348–1361, Oct. 1996

    1996

  38. [46]

    A 100 GHz FMCW MIMO radar system for 3D image reconstruction,

    D. Bleh, M. R ¨osch, M. Kuri, A. Dyck, A. Tessmann, A. Leuther, S. Wagner, and O. Ambacher, “A 100 GHz FMCW MIMO radar system for 3D image reconstruction,” in 2016 European Radar Conference (EuRAD), Oct. 2016, pp. 37–40

    2016

  39. [47]

    MIMO Radar Calibration and Imagery for Near-Field Scattering Diagnosis,

    Y . Liu, X. Xu, and G. Xu, “MIMO Radar Calibration and Imagery for Near-Field Scattering Diagnosis,” IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, vol. 54, no. 1, pp. 442–452, Feb. 2018

    2018

  40. [48]

    Persistent Scatterer Interferometry: A review,

    M. Crosetto, O. Monserrat, M. Cuevas-Gonz ´alez, N. Devanth ´ery, and B. Crippa, “Persistent Scatterer Interferometry: A review,” ISPRS Jour- nal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing , vol. 115, pp. 78–89, May 2016

    2016

  41. [49]

    Short-time Co- herent Incoherent Synthetic Aperture Radar Processing for a Handheld Imaging System,

    G. Alvarez-Narciandi, J. Laviada, and F. Las-Heras, “Short-time Co- herent Incoherent Synthetic Aperture Radar Processing for a Handheld Imaging System,” IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measure- ment, vol. 73, pp. 1–9, 2024

    2024

  42. [50]

    mmSight: Towards Robust Millimeter-Wave Imaging on Handheld Devices,

    J. M. Schellberg, H. Regmi, and S. Sur, “mmSight: Towards Robust Millimeter-Wave Imaging on Handheld Devices,” in Proceedings of the IEEE International Symposium on a World of Wireless, Mobile and Multimedia Networks (WoWMoM), Jun. 2023, pp. 117–126. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MOBIL...

    2023

  43. [51]

    MilliCam: Hand-held Millimeter-Wave Imaging,

    M. S. Saadat, S. Sur, S. Nelakuditi, and P. Ramanathan, “MilliCam: Hand-held Millimeter-Wave Imaging,” in Proceedings of the Interna- tional Conference on Computer Communications and Networks (IC- CCN), Aug. 2020, pp. 1–9

    2020

  44. [52]

    MSense: Boosting Wireless Sensing Capability Under Motion Interference,

    Z. Chang, F. Zhang, J. Xiong, W. Chen, and D. Zhang, “MSense: Boosting Wireless Sensing Capability Under Motion Interference,” in Proceedings of the Annual International Conference on Mobile Com- puting And Networking (MobiCom) , Sep. 2024, pp. 1–16

    2024

  45. [53]

    From Single-Point to Multi-Point Reflection Modeling: Robust Vital Signs Monitoring via mmWave Sensing,

    D. Zhang, X. Zhang, Y . Xie, F. Zhang, H. Yang, and D. Zhang, “From Single-Point to Multi-Point Reflection Modeling: Robust Vital Signs Monitoring via mmWave Sensing,” IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing, no. 01, pp. 1–16, Aug. 2024

    2024

  46. [54]

    Co-Sense: Exploiting Cooperative Dark Pixels in Radio Sensing for Non-Stationary Target,

    J. Chen, D. Zhang, G. Zhang, H. Wang, Q. Sun, and Y . Chen, “Co-Sense: Exploiting Cooperative Dark Pixels in Radio Sensing for Non-Stationary Target,” IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing , pp. 1–18, 2024

    2024

  47. [55]

    mmRotation: Unlocking Versatility of a Single mmWave Radar via Horizontal Mobility and Azimuthal Rotation,

    D. Zhang, X. Zhang, Z. Yin, Y . Xie, H. Wei, Z. Chang, W. Li, and D. Zhang, “mmRotation: Unlocking Versatility of a Single mmWave Radar via Horizontal Mobility and Azimuthal Rotation,” IEEE Transac- tions on Mobile Computing , pp. 1–16, 2025

    2025

  48. [56]

    MilliSign: mmWave-Based passive signs for guiding UA Vs in poor visibility conditions,

    T. Iizuka, T. Sasatani, T. Nakamura, N. Kosaka, M. Hisada, and Y . Kawa- hara, “MilliSign: mmWave-Based passive signs for guiding UA Vs in poor visibility conditions,” in Proceedings of the Annual International Conference on Mobile Computing And Networking (MobiCom) , 2023, pp. 1–15

    2023

  49. [57]

    A Deep Learning Framework for Beam Selection and Power Control in Massive MIMO - Millimeter-Wave Communications,

    T. T. Nguyen and K.-K. Nguyen, “A Deep Learning Framework for Beam Selection and Power Control in Massive MIMO - Millimeter-Wave Communications,” IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing , vol. 22, no. 8, pp. 4374–4387, Aug. 2023

    2023

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.