Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Colocation of skill related suppliers -- Revisiting coagglomeration using firm-to-firm network data

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2405.07071 v1 pith:37VHSV3Z submitted 2024-05-11 physics.soc-ph econ.GNq-fin.EC

classification physics.soc-phecon.GNq-fin.EC
keywords firmswhencoagglomerationcolocationconnectionsindustriesskillsupply
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Strong local clusters help firms compete on global markets. One explanation for this is that firms benefit from locating close to their suppliers and customers. However, the emergence of global supply chains shows that physical proximity is not necessarily a prerequisite to successfully manage customer-supplier relations anymore. This raises the question when firms need to colocate in value chains and when they can coordinate over longer distances. We hypothesize that one important aspect is the extent to which supply chain partners exchange not just goods but also know-how. To test this, we build on an expanding literature that studies the drivers of industrial coagglomeration to analyze when supply chain connections lead firms to colocation. We exploit detailed micro-data for the Hungarian economy between 2015 and 2017, linking firm registries, employer-employee matched data and firm-to-firm transaction data from value-added tax records. This allows us to observe colocation, labor flows and value chain connections at the level of firms, as well as construct aggregated coagglomeration patterns, skill relatedness and input-output connections between pairs of industries. We show that supply chains are more likely to support coagglomeration when the industries involved are also skill related. That is, input-output and labor market channels reinforce each other, but supplier connections only matter for colocation when industries have similar labor requirements, suggesting that they employ similar types of know-how. We corroborate this finding by analyzing the interactions between firms, showing that supplier relations are more geographically constrained between companies that operate in skill related industries.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Systemic risk mitigation in supply chains through network rewiring

    econ.GN 2025-04 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Constrained rewiring of supplier-customer links cuts modeled systemic risk by 16 to 50 percent across six firm-level supply chain subnetworks without changing firms' production functions.

  2. Evolution and determinants of firm-level systemic risk in local production networks

    physics.soc-ph 2025-06 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Using a random-network baseline, the study shows that Budapest firms' systemic risk fell below null-model expectations after COVID-19, with importers and exporters affecting local risk in opposite ways.

Pith tools